Added: 9 months ago
From: UnofficialRepublican
Views: 691
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @gunnut1405 other than the poor quality yeah it's pretty solid as to what can happen. The fewer gun control laws there are the safer it is, despite what Gun Control Activists say. For the most part just aiming a firearm at a home invader will make them flee, their stupid enough to break in but not enough risk their life over a stereo or laptop, but if they attempt to fight back, you're in the right to shoot them dead in defense.

  • Who was dumb enough to dislike this video? Must be a brady campaign psyco

  • Simple, to the point and about as true to life as you can get. If the armed criminal got away and outside of your property line...simply call the cops and give a detailed description (as best you can) of the suspect and let the police do their job. Great job on the details as to why he was shot. More anti gun activists should see this guys. If he would have simply got away and not threatened...noone would have been killed or injured. Precisely what us pro gun folks want :P

  • Ok, that's some really poor acting but the point is clear. The bad guys will always be armed whether its legal or not. The only choice for voters is if they want the choice to protect themselves, or give up that choice.

  • i dont agree and heres why: we need gun control laws like no full autos or say maybe rpgs simply because that is way too much to be defending with. the netherlands and several countries outlawed guns and they have a low crime rate. of course then only outlaws would have guns. but lets face the facts, guns are fun and useful tools. therefore we should have gun laws but not extremely strict laws. oh and not to be mean but you wont present a compelling argument as a 15 year old or whatever your age

  • @champjb25 To your 1st point - fully automatic guns are already HIGHLY regulated and they are hardly ever used in crimes. To your 2nd point - an RPG is not "arms" but rather ordinance so your argument is moot. To your 3rd point - comparisons with other countries are invalid for a number of reasons and even if they were you could point to other countries with FEW gun laws and LOW crime rates. What you will not be able to find is a country where they passed NEW gun laws and crime dropped.

  • @vaguy78 im not saying we should outlaw guns. but i want you to supply me proof to all 3 of your statements. and believe me im not anti gun in any sense of the word. i hunt and i fish. but you did bring up some good points.and i suspect that you think Obama is trying to outlaw guns. well no. the bill he voted for in 2001 was to simply make it harder to get handguns. he now says he doesnt have the same views towards the subject and does not want to outlaw. we need more comment space. you agree?

  • @champjb25 I know you wrote this 2 months ago, but you did say that the bill was to make it harder to get handguns. You dont see that as anti-gun? How do you see this law reducing crime? Do you see the criminals watching the vote on c-span saying "damn, now I cant get a gun"? Laws only apply to people who follow them.

  • scene 1 what is the point of gun controll if he hits him with the gun lol

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more