Just what is this ad trying to say? The planet is kicking our asses because we aren't being nice enough to it? The planet slaughters us and that's why we should treat it better? The planet is 100 times more evil than the people living on it? The planet goes out of its way to make us suffer in some attempt to make us take care of endangered species? If the planet is so powerful, can't it take care of them instead of devoting itself to genocide?
Seriously, pro wrestling makes more sense than this
@ChaosFabse That's a silly rebuttal, we will all die and if humans become extinct so be it. Is not like it can affect me somehow. Plus is not like I'm going to care after I die, since well I'll be dead...
The WWF initially said it had not signed off on the spot, although it later changed its position and issued a joint apology with the Brazilian agency responsible for producing it. Good.
I'd say most people are over reacting to this add. All it's doing is showing the capabilities of our planet. I respect the people who were killed in 9/11, but I also respect the people who were killed in the tsunami.
@ArmadilloFilms But our planet didn't killed the people at the 9/11....Terrorists did. The Tsunami Catastrophe pass. Why? because it's a natural plate-tectonic movement in the underwater surface. But still, this ad. is not very appropriate.
They act like geological event are a result of human activity.... Comparing that to 911 acting like that... I'd like to fly a plane into the house of whoever developed this commercial and tell them to RESPECT AMERICANS
One Cannot compare the Action of Nature to that of Actions of those who wanted to create Fear by taking the Lives of innocent People. We do respect the Earth but one can Never forget those who was lost on that Tragic Day.
Take a moment to consider the amount of deaths in wars and genocides, Americans always behave like they are the worst affected victims in every situation
@gabbynora Take a moment to consider exactly what constitutes a logical argument. Then try making one for a change. This ad is despicable. Your anti-American bullcrap clouds your judgment to the point where I doubt you are capable of any intellectual honesty, but I'll ask you to consider this anyway: If on, say, 9/13/11, there was a big terrorist attack in, say, Australia, where twice as many people were killed... would this therefore make comparing 9/11 to tsunamis justifiable?
@canofsand It doesn't take a supposedly-blinded-by-patriotism/elitist American to take offense at this. It takes a blinded-by-hatred anti-American to not see it as despicable.
@canofsand If you want further evidence, look no further than John Pilger's video (on his website) "Paying the Price: Killing the Children of Iraq" (assuming you're not ignorant enough to immediately dismiss it as "left-wing anti-American propaganda" -_-')
Respect it? They actually had the balls to say "respect" in that ad? How bout respecting the lives lost on 9/11 instead of making a mockery of it? Wow...
ok there is a HUGE difference between terrorist attacks and natural disasters. 9/11 was senseless acts of terrorism that killed innocent people. It could have been prevented by a stronger level of intelligence on our country's part. The way it happened and the reason that it could have been prevented is what was so tragic. Easy way to prevent tsunami deaths. Don;t live close to any shoreline and you should be fine. Tsunami's are not preventable. Just like tornadoes or volcanoes. Terrorism is.
My condolences to families who died in 9/11 but I have to say I really don't care about the buildings. I think all modern buildings look ugly and I hate nu architecs and all responsible for making such atrocities like more modern skycrapers and roads. I hate more conventional roads coz it let more cars more space to drive, and people then makes more cars, then more roads, then more buildings for corporate slugs who then makes more cars and roads.
I see your point now but, even so, you use physical examples to try and describe it - which is false, as the only "suffering" will be emotional, affecting the friends and families of the dead.
That being said, I have no doubts that more money has been made off the very "Anniversary of 9/11" every year than has from this clip. Essentially, all this video clip is doing is saying "the casualties for 9/11 were bad, but the casualties for the tsunami were far worse" - which is, technically, true.
@Etular In what way is it "worse?" Is sheer number the only consideration? Nature isn't evil. Acts of people can be. Surely Evil Itself can be considered "worse" than a natural disaster in one sense. But first, tell us - are the acts of terrorists comparable to the acts of people who don't buy into the global warming scare and thus don't take kindly to (let alone conform to) all your "go green" initiatives and laws? Go into detail. Let's see just how much of a moral relativist you are.
@canofsand It's worse, as said, due to the numerical amount killed. "Evil" is a subjective term (indeed, I am a relativist rather than the close-minded moral objectivist) that can't be definitively applied to anyone. Regardless of how many people were killed, dictators and their followers surely believed, in their own mind, that they were doing the right thing and we were the "evil" (which, seeing US foreign policy, isn't that difficult to imagine).
@canofsand I would argue that, to some people (not necessarily myself, as it's obvious the anti-environmentalists are only indirectly killing others, ignorant of the cause), they could be seen as comparable in the sense that both groups are resulting in the death of others by failing to take action. Needless to say, in reference to pollution, the US and/or China are probably the worst offenders - albeit, they rarely ever feel the effects of it, thus, they tend to ignore it and let others suffer.
@Etular True "moral relativists" are rare; most claim the position as an excuse for immorality. Let's find out if you're REALLY a moral relativist, or just a fool who clings to moral relativist notions so long as they support your immoral positions: A true moral relativist doesn't just say there's no such thing as right or wrong as a concept inherent to the universe or our existence. Therefore, murder is not inherently wrong. It's only LABELED "wrong" by society. Your position?
@canofsand Yes - Murder IS only labelled "wrong" due to societal norms, and in many other cultures it may even be justified under certain circumstances. Infact, there are examples in American culture via the states that allow Capital Punishment and Abortion - both of which are "murder", but because it's legal or consensual it's deemed "okay".
The words "right" and "wrong" are just farces within themselves, to try and justify a certain viewpoint.
one of the worst tragedies 911 was bad but it was nothing compared to the concentration camps, d-day, pearl harbor, the titanic, and the atomic bombings.
@CardShark989 Okay, the fact that you're comparing 9/11 to those things is not only "apples and oranges," it's also *ridiculous*. Titanic was worse than 9/11?? Even in the intellectually-bankrupt sense of checking only casualty counts, which is what you seem to be trying to do and what WWF and other alarmists are doing here, the sinking of the Titanic didn't result in more casualties than the 9/11 attacks. Not that such ignorance should be surprising given that you'd compare them to begin with.
I agree with this video. They are not downgrading 9/11 at all, but you have to consider the the tragedy in SE Asia had more deaths and it was because of how humans destroy the environment. Many humans have died from environmental damage, not to mention the countless number of animals that have died and even went extinct.
@Eceoes Yes, nature's body count is higher, but it will never be as terrifying as 9/11, because it was a horrific act committed by people. Even though it didn't kill as much as tsunamis, it made everybody wonder what made a bunch of human beings, just like you and me, to try. And that had more of an impact than any natural event.
WWF more like WTF sick fucks comparing some psychotic people to the true power of the earth. Man may be responsible for a lot of problems on earth but comparing that day to the natural disasters of the world is retarded. If they quit making fucking commercials they would have millions or billions more to save animals. Some people are fucking retarded. This is just some rich company trying to get richer hiding behind its bullshit. This commercial is more disgusting than the day it really happened
I find this ad extremely sick.....they're comparing 9/11 to nature.....only 2,819 were killed on 9/11 HOWEVER millions upon millions of humans die every year from a tsunami....so what are you saying World Wildlife FUCKS, should we start a war against MOTHER NATURE next after we end the war on Terrorism?
honestly this is a great commercial!! it is exactly showing the point.... one incident like 9/11 doesnt compare to the millions and millions of people dying in the world from other inhuman stuff.... if you are sensitive about 9/11, you should be about the rest also
Weird Wacko Federation needs 2 understand humans cannot always control nature . Natural disasters have been happening 4 millions and billions of years but we can control mans inhumanity 2 man
WOW you can make your point and not be rude to all the families that lost a loved one on 9/11...it meas just because the Tsunami killed more people, 9/11 is not such big deal?
Personally, I have to admit it I kind of liked this ad, in an ironic sort of way, and they did make their point. That said, I think it reflects badly on the World Wildlife Fund that they chose to use such sensitive subject matter in such a flippant way, and it does seem to have done more harm than good. But then, maybe we shouldn't expect great judgement from an eco-organization that uses a panda as its symbol...an animal that seems DETERMINED to go extinct!
@AceOfSpadesX It's not the world wrestling federation (World Wild fund) same organization that sued WWF wrestling,for copy right infringement,thats why Vince Mcmahon had to change it to WWE.
PERSPECTIVE.... 100 times more people died, yes... but GET YOUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT.... a LIFE is a LIFE.... Is it any better when a natural disaster takes it rather than another human being?????
Seriously, like fuck you world wildlife fund. And no, I will not call you fucks "WWF". The true WWF gave us hulkamania, and god bless them for it too.
@JiminyKracker The "true" WWF are a group of posers and actors performing a script in which the result is predetermined and where "superstars" get "injured" for our entertainment. The other WWF is a respected, international animal-rights group that has stopped us from simply killing, butchering or hunting every animal in our immediate vicinity - they are the heroes of the Animal World.
You may hate this advertisement (I don't), but your comment is just plain disrespectful to the work they do.
@JiminyKracker True - even so, Johnny Depp still pretty much admits he's acting outside of films - going on news channels and speaking to presenters etc. As far as I see it, WWE/WWF Wrestlers are just there to make sure little kiddies believe in the big, bearded man climbing down the chimney. :-/
@krd To say the least, far many more people have died for far worse reasons, and we still linger on being offended by a number. Ofcourse, the people that died for worse reasons don't matter - they aren't American.
I wonder which these events Americans would perceive as the "worst" - 9/11, in which a measly 3,000 died; WWII in which over 72,000,000 were killed total or Stalinist Russia - in which the death toll is up to debate. I half expect the Americans to say 9/11 still, to be honest. -_-'
Americans died in WW2 on Europe soil and are buried in it. Americans gave there lives to fight against Stalist Russia 1st in Korea and then in Vietnam. You say America doesnt care when its not Americans dieing, then why the fuck do our soldiers die so the other that the peaple of other countries can be free. 9/11 was terrible because we lost, there ws nothing we could do to stop it onces those towers fell. During WW2 and Stalinist Russia there was always hope.
@MiddleSideFilmStudio I must admit, I'm glad you mentioned "Stalinist Russia" instead of tarring all of Socialism under the same brush - albeit, there was the forced removal of the Democratic Chilean Salvador Allende or Guatemalan Arbenz by the CIA as examples of negative American Influence. That being said, it was the Cold War.
Technically, we did respond to the 9/11 threat - by going to war with half of the Arab World, infact, and killing bin Laden as well as countless civilian "unpeople".
That doesn't mean I can't hate this advert for using a terror attack as a means to get money.
And I object to your term measley in the context in which you use it. Yes in comparison to the other numbers it's small, but a life is still a life, that's still three thousand people who aren't coming home to thier families and at the end of the day, WWF just used it to make money.
@krd I'm not claiming the Holocaust was a good thing, just to clarify - I agree that it's 3,000 people not coming home to their families. That being said, as the WWF states in this article, 280,000 people aren't coming home to their families due to the tsunami. In my eyes, using the attack to gain money is justified due to the fact that the money is going to help a cause that suffered far greater casualties. As for the Holocaust memorabilia, again, I would say "Yes" if it went to a good cause.
@Etular That still doesn't make it right for me to sell it, whether or not the money is going to a good cause, the money is still tainted because it was made through suffering. Example, I deal drugs, but I use the money to pay for my sick grandmother's medical care or I steal or kill but use the money for a children's home, is that right?
@Etular I don't think its the "They don't matter because they are not American" It's the this was a terrorist and cowardly attack against civilians not a powerful act of nature that is unavoidable and part of life. I think that's why it was controversial. You cant compare something nature constructs to something evil people do.
@Etular I don't typically try to humor people with this biased behavior but we in the U.S. do mourn the loss of others outside of our country.
And perhaps using World War 2 wasn't your best example because in case you're unaware there were a lot of U.S. soldiers that died helping England and Europe. In fact we kept you guys supplied. And ran through machine gun fire to help out Europe. We mourn and feel bad for Europe and constantly learn about what Europe went through.
@Etular You seem to forget the cultural and historical aspect. Of course most Americans would perceive 9/11 worse then Stalinist Russia because 1) 9/11 happened just 10 years ago 2) 9/11 happened on U.S. soil, the people who died there had the same nationality, same culture, same language and mostly a similar social background. I wonder which of these events you would describe as worse: the death of your own mother with 1 person dying or the holocaust with 6,000,000 million dead. You see?
@Etular You're a despicable worm. You anti-American hatemongering scumbags have no evidence for your claims, not that facts matter to you. You are disgusting. This ad is offensive and if you can't understand why, you're an idiot; more likely, you do understand it, you're just such an alarmist zombie that you've blinded yourself to reality.
@canofsand No evidence for my claims? Okay, should I point out examples of America's complete disregard for UN Policy? How about their forceful removal of democratic presidents, replacing them with dictatorial ones? Or the fact that (according to Mark Curtis) over 6,000 Iraqi children are dying from malnutrition due to the US' illegal (having not received UN permission) internal trade embargoes - preventing food from entering the country. I assure you, my "anit-American" sentiment is justified.
@Etular So in the fantasy land you live in, UN policy makes things okay and good? Do you have any idea who the UN is? The world's worst human rights offenders sit on the human rights council. Do you have any idea who Saddam was? Oh, and here's a tip: When someone points out how you don't have evidence, listing a bunch of baseless grievances and accusations doesn't a logical retort make. But at least you admit you're anti-American. It pretty well establishes your (lack of) credibility.
@canofsand I'm Anti-American/Internationalist, just as (how someone else has mentioned) you're a patriotic nationalist - my viewpoint is about as justified as yours is because we're both on polar extremes of the spectrum, and if you believe that to be "not very much", so be it. Yes, I know who Saddam and the UN were. He was the President of Iraq who allegedly killed his own people (after getting into power via UK funding in 1963), the UN were reluctant to follow through with such harsh
@canofsand no-fly zones and trade embargoes, so the US and UK did so anyway - as said, killing far more innocent civilians and children overall via malnutrition than Saddam had done overall. As for the question of whether or not the UN makes things "okay and good", the answer is no - because it didn't attempt to stop the US and UK for illegally enforcing no-fly zones and breaking international law (supposedly "impartial") on a large-scale.
@robbg80 Compare and contrast: 3000 US Civilians killed by 9/11; 14,000-34,000 Afghani civilians killed by the US Army from bombing because they were deemed "unworthy of life". Need I mention the "interventions" into South America, or the embargo of food, water and medical supplies entering into Iraq (enforcing more civilian deaths)?
People have no standpoint when they come to claiming this ad is "offensive", or that the US is somehow "the good guys". The US deserves all the criticism it gets.
@Etular Not "The U.S." it's the "U.S. government." I'm an American and I would never do any of those things. I try my hardest to do everything I can to change the U.S. government's policies but I can't get enough people to help me.
Americans who care can't even get the government to make it illegal to cut off part of a baby's genitals. I don't know what we can do.
But you're talking about the U.S. government, no "America" or Americans like me.
@Etular i don't agree with the war but do you think afghanis give a fuck about americans getting killed? this isn't criticism, this is a straight up insult. i don't agree with a lot of things my country does. i'm not very happy with the united states and the path it's taking right now. you can't justify 9/11, it's jut not going to happen. americans won't listen to you anyways. we are the most powerful country in the world and people expect us to just sit back and act like nothing happened.
@barudzija7 I think they, like most people in the world, do give a crap. Unless you have reliable justification to suggest otherwise, you're pretty much relying on a straw-man claim. I'm not trying to "justify" the murder of 3000 innocents, but I'm also not going to justify the murder of countless more in Afghanistan under ignorant claims that they are "naturally evil people". It's one thing to be "the most powerful country on Earth", but a completely different thing to flaunt it like the US.
@Etular just what in the hell do you think rome, greece, and egypt did? they flaunted the hell out of it. that just comes with the territory. it's sad but true. if i have to pick sides, i'm picking my own people. besides, everyone hates america these days anyway. don't get me wrong, half of the people's brains in this country have turned to mush but that doesn't mean i'm going to hop on the bandwagon of hating americans.
@Etular All three events are tragical. However, 9/11 was not a planned event, or a world wide happening. It targeted solely on America, and struck fear into Americans as they go about their every day lives. Now I may not be the most edumacated feller, but I can certainly say that 9/11 may not have killed as many people, but the idea of constant concern over when the next hi-jacking, or terrorist attack may occur left countless other humans, not just American's, insecure of their daily activities
@mcginlit1190 It's understandably how the use of media hype has blown this "threat" completely out of proportion (statistically, you're more likely to die falling down the stairs than by a terrorist attack), in order to justify the war against the aforementioned countries. The problem is, ofcourse, the media failing to pay much attention to this - benefiting from the people's fear, and slowly pushing them towards the paranoid belief that they should defend themselves from the invisible "threat".
@ricemancometh ...As well as being one of the top comments, shared by such Media-greats as Noam Chomsky, Michael Moore and Mark Curtis - all who became famous for being able to sufficiently back-up these anti-war views.
The only famous opposition to said views, for the most part, lies in the "Gawd Bless America!" Tea Party that still believes natural disasters are the work of God.
@Etular Michael Moore... there's one you want to compare your views to lol! He should be in a padded room and a straight jacket, provided they can find one big enough.
OMFG!!! Call me a pussy all you want but as soon as I saw planes 3 and 4, I stopped the video. I knew what was about to happen and I just couldn't watch the rest. If 9/11 didn't happen at all, this might have made for a cool/effed up hollywood movie, but this shit is effffed up!
Respect an earth that spits out natural disasters from time to time - and there is nothing we can do to stop them - earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes...
Did anyone in the boardroom ask what this advertisement's intention was? The selling point?? It's like some animator's sick dream... sad.
I actually find this advert very interesting. I can fully understand the impact they are trying to have here. To me it seems they're not saying 9/11 was not a tragedy, they are also not comparing it to the tsunami. They are using 2 very horrifying events to bring to light the seriousness of a problem that is very prominent. No matter how shocking a man-made tragedy can be if we don't try to protect this world, the disaster will be much more catastrophic.
Hm, fail. Not a very good way to say something like that. But then again the WWF is bought and paid for and rarely even does anything for the environment .
they just made the point that the earth is so powerful, and fuck america after afghanistan and iraq you lost the worlds sympathies for 9/11 because you illegally killed far more.
you allowed your leaders and the capitalist elite to strip you of your rights, drain your country of money and create vast debt, illegally start wars etc.
and you have the 2nd amendment, what were you thinking!
You know, despite the fact that WWF is using disasters like these for their own propaganda (and they should know better, since 9/11 and the tsunami are understandably very personal subjects for many people) it does bring up a good point. Far more people died in the tsunami yet barely anything is heard about it in comparison. One could make a point that this video is an insult to 9/11 families, yet isn't it just as big an insult giving tsunami families the short end of the stick like this?
@Bewzbucket Environmentalists? I'm ashamed that there is even such a word. Everyone should care about our planet, not just a small group of "-ists" that goes against the stream. I consider this commercial unfortunate, but I am yet a bit disturbed at how people like you use this as a weapon against all people that care about Earth.
you guys are all FUCKING stupid. sure, it was a terrorist attack, but every day, more than 10 times that amount dies EVERY TEN SECONDS of any other cause, get over yourselves.
Fuck you WWF, how dare you 9/11 to your own profit ??? AMERICANS as well as western countries paid most of the tsunamis aid.
Plus do you realize that a tsunami is a natural disaster ? 9/11 was human and religion stupidity!!! So 9/11 is for me 100 more tragic and cruel than your third world tsunami.
I think this commercial makes a point we cared soo much on one minor thing and spend billions and billions of dollars...where as a natrual disaster causes 100 times more and only spend millions of dollars thats messed up! we need to take care of the earth! more than kill more people!
@VBAadmin Seriously? Let me spell it out for you, since you're a non-thinking SHEEP: They are making an equivalent, moral or otherwise, of a natural disaster with the intentional mass MURDER of innocent people by OTHER non-thinking SHEEP who follow a warped religious code. AT BEST, it's a non sequitur and insensitive. But, honestly? It's fully expected from planet-hugging non-thinking sheep.
@zilchsr Wow, I'm sorry for whatever I've done to offend *you*. Why're you so upset? It's impolite to start a conversation by calling someone a sheep.
I still don't see how it's insensitive. People die daily; what causes an event has nothing to do with how bad the consequences are. The ends are what must incur reaction, since they're what create the terror in the first place.
For example, if both planes missed the WTC, there wouldn't be nearly as much of a fuss.
@VBAadmin You remind me of that flight attendant character in the movie "Meet the Parents". You know ... that fake-smiley, over-reactor, accuse-you-of-being-hostile-even-though-you-have-a-smile-on-your-face type of projection? Yep .... that's you :-) I find it curious that you would label my observation that you're a sheep "being upset". It's an indication of your own projection and passive hostility.
@VBAadmin Additionally, who are YOU to be the arbiter of what "impolite" is? Who says calling someone a sheep is impolite? You ARE entitled to, of course, your own opinion ... just don't expect others to just accept your opinions as fact ... unless, of course, you WANT other people to be the same kind sheep that you are, blindly following the shepherd, whomever/whatever that is.
@VBAadmin I am not insulting you, I'm observing that you're a non-thinking sheep. I don't judge you, there are times when I don't think, either. I'm also not ignoring your point ... I was responding to your point (evidence that I wasn't ignoring it) and seeing no reconciliation of your point(s) and the facts. Your claim I was asserting my superiority, yet, you close with "That's enough". MORE PROJECTION. You engage in the same thing for which you're admonishing me. Typical liberal sheep.
@VBAadmin Two contradictions that I would not share if not for the irony of the first. #1: You're apparently "OPPOSED TO INTERNET CENSORSHIP", yet you blast "that's enough" in an INTERNET comment-posting forum. #2: Apparently, your IQ is approx. 125-137? If so, this gives you NO excuse for acting like a groupthink sheep. You should be ashamed of yourself, because you should know better. Otherwise, surrender your Mensa card (sorry, you wouldn't qualify for Triple 9 Society with a 137 IQ)
wwf panda don like wwf wrestling
Skismom02 4 hours ago
Misleading title -_-
sidewalksurfin9 1 day ago
Shit like this is why I hate the World Wildlife Fund.
Christianrocker1990 1 day ago
Just what is this ad trying to say? The planet is kicking our asses because we aren't being nice enough to it? The planet slaughters us and that's why we should treat it better? The planet is 100 times more evil than the people living on it? The planet goes out of its way to make us suffer in some attempt to make us take care of endangered species? If the planet is so powerful, can't it take care of them instead of devoting itself to genocide?
Seriously, pro wrestling makes more sense than this
FlandreScarletTepes 4 days ago
Preserving animals is unnatural, they need to be extinct if they can't adapt, that's nature.
dannielpreto 1 week ago 2
@dannielpreto I will remind you on that when you or rather your offspring are about to extinct....
ChaosFabse 1 day ago
@ChaosFabse That's a silly rebuttal, we will all die and if humans become extinct so be it. Is not like it can affect me somehow. Plus is not like I'm going to care after I die, since well I'll be dead...
dannielpreto 1 day ago
I have a sudden desire to hunt down every last panda.
Canid117 1 week ago
hey guys if you want to leave *coughs* feedback for the WWF for this comercial. heres there twitter page: twitter.com/#!/WWF
Tiberius95 1 week ago
fucking pandas
10litai 1 week ago
Best video EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ch3sse01 2 weeks ago
I love the wwf but I love America even more
makahra 2 weeks ago
i was watching wrestling!!!!
TheWrestlingOracle 2 weeks ago
Stop with that crap World wildlife fund all of you and all of these scientists are trying to scare US So shut up and piss off
maikeliRAIWALUI 2 weeks ago
@maikeliRAIWALUI
Ignorant
YourW0rstEnemy 2 weeks ago
@YourW0rstEnemy I HATE BEING CALLED IGNORANT
maikeliRAIWALUI 2 weeks ago
The WWF initially said it had not signed off on the spot, although it later changed its position and issued a joint apology with the Brazilian agency responsible for producing it. Good.
skydiveclaud 3 weeks ago
fucking panda's I was watching wrestling
123MLewis 1 month ago 15
check the WWF panda pact movie (german made) ...
tells you enough why you shouldnt put your money into this sh1thole oraganisation
codemaster2k 1 month ago
just saying wwf didn't approve of this message so don't spaz out
gmgusman 1 month ago
I'd say most people are over reacting to this add. All it's doing is showing the capabilities of our planet. I respect the people who were killed in 9/11, but I also respect the people who were killed in the tsunami.
ArmadilloFilms 1 month ago
@ArmadilloFilms fuck that I want wrestling
1Deminator 4 weeks ago
@ArmadilloFilms But our planet didn't killed the people at the 9/11....Terrorists did. The Tsunami Catastrophe pass. Why? because it's a natural plate-tectonic movement in the underwater surface. But still, this ad. is not very appropriate.
orami93 3 weeks ago
Thumbs up if you were expecting a little more A-Train, and a little less Plane.
TheOfficialiKON 1 month ago
I don't dive a fuck on this bull shit the real thing is.. how much do they die of hunger???? Why is wealth distribution so fucked up??
Xwozz 1 month ago
Fuck World Wildlife Fund!....Long Live to the World Wrestling Federation!
orami93 1 month ago 12
@orami93 truer words were never spoken
JPH8989 3 weeks ago
holy crap the other planes scared the shi* out of me
kylak8j 1 month ago
Good point, WWF.
Yes, 9/11 was a horrendus event, R.I.P. to all who died, but still.
UpAndLeave 1 month ago
@UpAndLeave f u
robbg80 1 month ago
Fuck the WWF
wonkydude1 1 month ago
long live the federation
7JaMeSdAbEaSt15 2 months ago
Fuck this.
dougieb92 2 months ago
Worst commercial ever
rosalie3034 2 months ago
They act like geological event are a result of human activity.... Comparing that to 911 acting like that... I'd like to fly a plane into the house of whoever developed this commercial and tell them to RESPECT AMERICANS
AirForceRabbits 2 months ago
One Cannot compare the Action of Nature to that of Actions of those who wanted to create Fear by taking the Lives of innocent People. We do respect the Earth but one can Never forget those who was lost on that Tragic Day.
MRWIL246 2 months ago
Get the F out
lXxMasterShakexXl 2 months ago
Take a moment to consider the amount of deaths in wars and genocides, Americans always behave like they are the worst affected victims in every situation
gabbynora 2 months ago
@gabbynora Take a moment to consider exactly what constitutes a logical argument. Then try making one for a change. This ad is despicable. Your anti-American bullcrap clouds your judgment to the point where I doubt you are capable of any intellectual honesty, but I'll ask you to consider this anyway: If on, say, 9/13/11, there was a big terrorist attack in, say, Australia, where twice as many people were killed... would this therefore make comparing 9/11 to tsunamis justifiable?
canofsand 2 months ago
@canofsand It doesn't take a supposedly-blinded-by-patriotism/elitist American to take offense at this. It takes a blinded-by-hatred anti-American to not see it as despicable.
canofsand 2 months ago
@canofsand If you want further evidence, look no further than John Pilger's video (on his website) "Paying the Price: Killing the Children of Iraq" (assuming you're not ignorant enough to immediately dismiss it as "left-wing anti-American propaganda" -_-')
Etular 2 months ago
@gabbynora more like we help and pay for those worst affected!
robbg80 1 month ago
Ima go liter lol
nibs784 2 months ago
Dear all stupid haters who unlike this video,
the world is not made of 50 states. America is not the world. Protect the planet first. God Bless Our Earth
frankvector13 2 months ago
@frankvector13 So, you approve of this ad then? You're disgusting.
canofsand 2 months ago
what the fuck really the 844 people who disliked this video i hope you burn in hell
steffandoo 2 months ago
Comment removed
canofsand 2 months ago
@steffandoo You have serious mental problems, you vulgar hatemongering alarmist zombie.
canofsand 2 months ago
@TheYoungGiant right . I was expecting to see the UNDERTAKER
lousteven 2 months ago
For the love of God!! How dare this motherfucking ad insult our dearly Americans??!!
iamdwyanecardiff 3 months ago
@iamdwyanecardiff damn use ur motherfucking stupid brain. Asshole.
frankvector13 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fuck the new world order
TheLevifour 3 months ago
Respect it? They actually had the balls to say "respect" in that ad? How bout respecting the lives lost on 9/11 instead of making a mockery of it? Wow...
svu3elliv 3 months ago
Soooo does this mean they get the name "WWF" removed and give it to the World Wrestling Federation! :D
RamboAAK 3 months ago
Forget about the 9/11 part, what does the Asian Tsunami have to do with pandas?
Madfoot713 3 months ago
WWF? More like WTF.
upiluften 3 months ago
ok there is a HUGE difference between terrorist attacks and natural disasters. 9/11 was senseless acts of terrorism that killed innocent people. It could have been prevented by a stronger level of intelligence on our country's part. The way it happened and the reason that it could have been prevented is what was so tragic. Easy way to prevent tsunami deaths. Don;t live close to any shoreline and you should be fine. Tsunami's are not preventable. Just like tornadoes or volcanoes. Terrorism is.
tomglavinehof1 3 months ago
If there were no skycrapers and mass air transportation mode invented none of this would've happened.
dylancrash 3 months ago
@dylancrash If you're seriously blaming human flight and modern architecture for this example of mass murder, then... I don't know what.
Kankles2013 3 months ago
@Kankles2013 Actually I'm pretty sure architecture was partly to blame in the sense that the engineers who built it cheated.
Madfoot713 3 months ago
My condolences to families who died in 9/11 but I have to say I really don't care about the buildings. I think all modern buildings look ugly and I hate nu architecs and all responsible for making such atrocities like more modern skycrapers and roads. I hate more conventional roads coz it let more cars more space to drive, and people then makes more cars, then more roads, then more buildings for corporate slugs who then makes more cars and roads.
dylancrash 3 months ago
lmfao! i thought it was World Wrestling Federation
thepunkster90 3 months ago
I see your point now but, even so, you use physical examples to try and describe it - which is false, as the only "suffering" will be emotional, affecting the friends and families of the dead.
That being said, I have no doubts that more money has been made off the very "Anniversary of 9/11" every year than has from this clip. Essentially, all this video clip is doing is saying "the casualties for 9/11 were bad, but the casualties for the tsunami were far worse" - which is, technically, true.
Etular 3 months ago
@Etular In what way is it "worse?" Is sheer number the only consideration? Nature isn't evil. Acts of people can be. Surely Evil Itself can be considered "worse" than a natural disaster in one sense. But first, tell us - are the acts of terrorists comparable to the acts of people who don't buy into the global warming scare and thus don't take kindly to (let alone conform to) all your "go green" initiatives and laws? Go into detail. Let's see just how much of a moral relativist you are.
canofsand 2 months ago
@canofsand It's worse, as said, due to the numerical amount killed. "Evil" is a subjective term (indeed, I am a relativist rather than the close-minded moral objectivist) that can't be definitively applied to anyone. Regardless of how many people were killed, dictators and their followers surely believed, in their own mind, that they were doing the right thing and we were the "evil" (which, seeing US foreign policy, isn't that difficult to imagine).
Etular 2 months ago
@canofsand I would argue that, to some people (not necessarily myself, as it's obvious the anti-environmentalists are only indirectly killing others, ignorant of the cause), they could be seen as comparable in the sense that both groups are resulting in the death of others by failing to take action. Needless to say, in reference to pollution, the US and/or China are probably the worst offenders - albeit, they rarely ever feel the effects of it, thus, they tend to ignore it and let others suffer.
Etular 2 months ago
@Etular True "moral relativists" are rare; most claim the position as an excuse for immorality. Let's find out if you're REALLY a moral relativist, or just a fool who clings to moral relativist notions so long as they support your immoral positions: A true moral relativist doesn't just say there's no such thing as right or wrong as a concept inherent to the universe or our existence. Therefore, murder is not inherently wrong. It's only LABELED "wrong" by society. Your position?
canofsand 2 months ago
@canofsand Yes - Murder IS only labelled "wrong" due to societal norms, and in many other cultures it may even be justified under certain circumstances. Infact, there are examples in American culture via the states that allow Capital Punishment and Abortion - both of which are "murder", but because it's legal or consensual it's deemed "okay".
The words "right" and "wrong" are just farces within themselves, to try and justify a certain viewpoint.
Etular 2 months ago
@canofsand America F Yeah!
robbg80 1 month ago
I though this was about wrestling.
jb08045 3 months ago
Stop comparing events and figures, it's immature and disrespectful
whiteholedy88 3 months ago 2
one of the worst tragedies 911 was bad but it was nothing compared to the concentration camps, d-day, pearl harbor, the titanic, and the atomic bombings.
CardShark989 3 months ago
@CardShark989 Okay, the fact that you're comparing 9/11 to those things is not only "apples and oranges," it's also *ridiculous*. Titanic was worse than 9/11?? Even in the intellectually-bankrupt sense of checking only casualty counts, which is what you seem to be trying to do and what WWF and other alarmists are doing here, the sinking of the Titanic didn't result in more casualties than the 9/11 attacks. Not that such ignorance should be surprising given that you'd compare them to begin with.
canofsand 2 months ago
I think I'm gonna go out and rev my engine for a while.
TeboFire 3 months ago
I agree with this video. They are not downgrading 9/11 at all, but you have to consider the the tragedy in SE Asia had more deaths and it was because of how humans destroy the environment. Many humans have died from environmental damage, not to mention the countless number of animals that have died and even went extinct.
Eceoes 3 months ago
@Eceoes Yes, nature's body count is higher, but it will never be as terrifying as 9/11, because it was a horrific act committed by people. Even though it didn't kill as much as tsunamis, it made everybody wonder what made a bunch of human beings, just like you and me, to try. And that had more of an impact than any natural event.
Jobbeybob 3 months ago
what a powerful advert, it was so powerful that it provoked all these deep political discussions, they succeed
DonMadzz 3 months ago
This video makes a good argument, but religion, mostly Christianity, has killed more people than the 2005 tsunami.
uoyllorti 3 months ago 10
@uoyllorti and f u
robbg80 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Who the fuck thought of an idea like this ?? This is fucked up !!
SubaruWRXtreme 3 months ago
I hope the person that made this commercial has to suffer the rest of their lifetime in a damn concentration/prison camp. Retards these days!!!
edudwahs 3 months ago
WWF more like WTF sick fucks comparing some psychotic people to the true power of the earth. Man may be responsible for a lot of problems on earth but comparing that day to the natural disasters of the world is retarded. If they quit making fucking commercials they would have millions or billions more to save animals. Some people are fucking retarded. This is just some rich company trying to get richer hiding behind its bullshit. This commercial is more disgusting than the day it really happened
edudwahs 3 months ago
I find this ad extremely sick.....they're comparing 9/11 to nature.....only 2,819 were killed on 9/11 HOWEVER millions upon millions of humans die every year from a tsunami....so what are you saying World Wildlife FUCKS, should we start a war against MOTHER NATURE next after we end the war on Terrorism?
TheWhammiesrule 3 months ago
The WTC is way too small in that ad. It should be, like, 3 times bigger than that.
eruption257 3 months ago
honestly this is a great commercial!! it is exactly showing the point.... one incident like 9/11 doesnt compare to the millions and millions of people dying in the world from other inhuman stuff.... if you are sensitive about 9/11, you should be about the rest also
mmaurer26 3 months ago
stupid fucking ad.
TDLProductionsUK 3 months ago 2
Weird Wacko Federation needs 2 understand humans cannot always control nature . Natural disasters have been happening 4 millions and billions of years but we can control mans inhumanity 2 man
westnblu 3 months ago
fuck the wild life faggots
shawn863 3 months ago
WOW you can make your point and not be rude to all the families that lost a loved one on 9/11...it meas just because the Tsunami killed more people, 9/11 is not such big deal?
misled1982 4 months ago
Personally, I have to admit it I kind of liked this ad, in an ironic sort of way, and they did make their point. That said, I think it reflects badly on the World Wildlife Fund that they chose to use such sensitive subject matter in such a flippant way, and it does seem to have done more harm than good. But then, maybe we shouldn't expect great judgement from an eco-organization that uses a panda as its symbol...an animal that seems DETERMINED to go extinct!
Daviticus042 4 months ago
This is a great commercial...
TwoWhiteJawns 4 months ago
why does the world wrestling federation care about our planet?
AceOfSpadesX 4 months ago
@AceOfSpadesX it was not The WWF/WWE company it was The World Wildlife Federation
88greggreg1 3 months ago
@AceOfSpadesX It's not the world wrestling federation (World Wild fund) same organization that sued WWF wrestling,for copy right infringement,thats why Vince Mcmahon had to change it to WWE.
totoynani143 3 months ago
i thought this was going to be the real wwf's commercial, sadly it wasnt, thumbs down...
bigzebes 4 months ago
PERSPECTIVE..... What the fuck????
PERSPECTIVE.... 100 times more people died, yes... but GET YOUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT.... a LIFE is a LIFE.... Is it any better when a natural disaster takes it rather than another human being?????
Seriously....
mureedahmad 4 months ago
intent and will is what made the difference, dummies comparing apples to oranges with shitty logic
audacityx 4 months ago
Seriously, like fuck you world wildlife fund. And no, I will not call you fucks "WWF". The true WWF gave us hulkamania, and god bless them for it too.
JiminyKracker 4 months ago 20
@JiminyKracker The "true" WWF are a group of posers and actors performing a script in which the result is predetermined and where "superstars" get "injured" for our entertainment. The other WWF is a respected, international animal-rights group that has stopped us from simply killing, butchering or hunting every animal in our immediate vicinity - they are the heroes of the Animal World.
You may hate this advertisement (I don't), but your comment is just plain disrespectful to the work they do.
Etular 4 months ago
@Etular They're actors. So what? You don't hate on Johnny Depp for that do ya?
JiminyKracker 4 months ago
@JiminyKracker True - even so, Johnny Depp still pretty much admits he's acting outside of films - going on news channels and speaking to presenters etc. As far as I see it, WWE/WWF Wrestlers are just there to make sure little kiddies believe in the big, bearded man climbing down the chimney. :-/
Etular 4 months ago
@Etular Do I hate WWF?
Yes
Why?
Because they used 9/11 in such a flippant way
krd 3 months ago
@krd To say the least, far many more people have died for far worse reasons, and we still linger on being offended by a number. Ofcourse, the people that died for worse reasons don't matter - they aren't American.
I wonder which these events Americans would perceive as the "worst" - 9/11, in which a measly 3,000 died; WWII in which over 72,000,000 were killed total or Stalinist Russia - in which the death toll is up to debate. I half expect the Americans to say 9/11 still, to be honest. -_-'
Etular 3 months ago 10
Americans died in WW2 on Europe soil and are buried in it. Americans gave there lives to fight against Stalist Russia 1st in Korea and then in Vietnam. You say America doesnt care when its not Americans dieing, then why the fuck do our soldiers die so the other that the peaple of other countries can be free. 9/11 was terrible because we lost, there ws nothing we could do to stop it onces those towers fell. During WW2 and Stalinist Russia there was always hope.
MiddleSideFilmStudio 3 months ago
@MiddleSideFilmStudio I must admit, I'm glad you mentioned "Stalinist Russia" instead of tarring all of Socialism under the same brush - albeit, there was the forced removal of the Democratic Chilean Salvador Allende or Guatemalan Arbenz by the CIA as examples of negative American Influence. That being said, it was the Cold War.
Technically, we did respond to the 9/11 threat - by going to war with half of the Arab World, infact, and killing bin Laden as well as countless civilian "unpeople".
Etular 3 months ago
@Etular I don't know, I'm not american.
That doesn't mean I can't hate this advert for using a terror attack as a means to get money.
And I object to your term measley in the context in which you use it. Yes in comparison to the other numbers it's small, but a life is still a life, that's still three thousand people who aren't coming home to thier families and at the end of the day, WWF just used it to make money.
Should I start selling Holocaust memorabilia?
It's the same thing.
krd 3 months ago
@krd I'm not claiming the Holocaust was a good thing, just to clarify - I agree that it's 3,000 people not coming home to their families. That being said, as the WWF states in this article, 280,000 people aren't coming home to their families due to the tsunami. In my eyes, using the attack to gain money is justified due to the fact that the money is going to help a cause that suffered far greater casualties. As for the Holocaust memorabilia, again, I would say "Yes" if it went to a good cause.
Etular 3 months ago
@Etular That still doesn't make it right for me to sell it, whether or not the money is going to a good cause, the money is still tainted because it was made through suffering. Example, I deal drugs, but I use the money to pay for my sick grandmother's medical care or I steal or kill but use the money for a children's home, is that right?
krd 3 months ago
Comment removed
Etular 3 months ago
@Etular "Ends justify the means"
Stereotypical evil. No surprise the alarmist went there.
canofsand 2 months ago
@Etular I don't think its the "They don't matter because they are not American" It's the this was a terrorist and cowardly attack against civilians not a powerful act of nature that is unavoidable and part of life. I think that's why it was controversial. You cant compare something nature constructs to something evil people do.
lulu89PB 3 months ago
@Etular I don't typically try to humor people with this biased behavior but we in the U.S. do mourn the loss of others outside of our country.
And perhaps using World War 2 wasn't your best example because in case you're unaware there were a lot of U.S. soldiers that died helping England and Europe. In fact we kept you guys supplied. And ran through machine gun fire to help out Europe. We mourn and feel bad for Europe and constantly learn about what Europe went through.
Jiyuria 3 months ago
@Etular Wartime casualties are different than civilian deaths. This was an attack during peace-time too.
upiluften 3 months ago
@Etular You seem to forget the cultural and historical aspect. Of course most Americans would perceive 9/11 worse then Stalinist Russia because 1) 9/11 happened just 10 years ago 2) 9/11 happened on U.S. soil, the people who died there had the same nationality, same culture, same language and mostly a similar social background. I wonder which of these events you would describe as worse: the death of your own mother with 1 person dying or the holocaust with 6,000,000 million dead. You see?
TaleOfValors 3 months ago
Comment removed
canofsand 2 months ago
@Etular You're a despicable worm. You anti-American hatemongering scumbags have no evidence for your claims, not that facts matter to you. You are disgusting. This ad is offensive and if you can't understand why, you're an idiot; more likely, you do understand it, you're just such an alarmist zombie that you've blinded yourself to reality.
canofsand 2 months ago
@canofsand No evidence for my claims? Okay, should I point out examples of America's complete disregard for UN Policy? How about their forceful removal of democratic presidents, replacing them with dictatorial ones? Or the fact that (according to Mark Curtis) over 6,000 Iraqi children are dying from malnutrition due to the US' illegal (having not received UN permission) internal trade embargoes - preventing food from entering the country. I assure you, my "anit-American" sentiment is justified.
Etular 2 months ago
@Etular So in the fantasy land you live in, UN policy makes things okay and good? Do you have any idea who the UN is? The world's worst human rights offenders sit on the human rights council. Do you have any idea who Saddam was? Oh, and here's a tip: When someone points out how you don't have evidence, listing a bunch of baseless grievances and accusations doesn't a logical retort make. But at least you admit you're anti-American. It pretty well establishes your (lack of) credibility.
canofsand 2 months ago
@canofsand I'm Anti-American/Internationalist, just as (how someone else has mentioned) you're a patriotic nationalist - my viewpoint is about as justified as yours is because we're both on polar extremes of the spectrum, and if you believe that to be "not very much", so be it. Yes, I know who Saddam and the UN were. He was the President of Iraq who allegedly killed his own people (after getting into power via UK funding in 1963), the UN were reluctant to follow through with such harsh
Etular 2 months ago
@canofsand no-fly zones and trade embargoes, so the US and UK did so anyway - as said, killing far more innocent civilians and children overall via malnutrition than Saddam had done overall. As for the question of whether or not the UN makes things "okay and good", the answer is no - because it didn't attempt to stop the US and UK for illegally enforcing no-fly zones and breaking international law (supposedly "impartial") on a large-scale.
Etular 2 months ago
@Etular fu
robbg80 1 month ago
@robbg80 Compare and contrast: 3000 US Civilians killed by 9/11; 14,000-34,000 Afghani civilians killed by the US Army from bombing because they were deemed "unworthy of life". Need I mention the "interventions" into South America, or the embargo of food, water and medical supplies entering into Iraq (enforcing more civilian deaths)?
People have no standpoint when they come to claiming this ad is "offensive", or that the US is somehow "the good guys". The US deserves all the criticism it gets.
Etular 1 month ago
@Etular Not "The U.S." it's the "U.S. government." I'm an American and I would never do any of those things. I try my hardest to do everything I can to change the U.S. government's policies but I can't get enough people to help me.
Americans who care can't even get the government to make it illegal to cut off part of a baby's genitals. I don't know what we can do.
But you're talking about the U.S. government, no "America" or Americans like me.
nightotter200 4 weeks ago
@Etular i don't agree with the war but do you think afghanis give a fuck about americans getting killed? this isn't criticism, this is a straight up insult. i don't agree with a lot of things my country does. i'm not very happy with the united states and the path it's taking right now. you can't justify 9/11, it's jut not going to happen. americans won't listen to you anyways. we are the most powerful country in the world and people expect us to just sit back and act like nothing happened.
barudzija7 1 week ago
@barudzija7 I think they, like most people in the world, do give a crap. Unless you have reliable justification to suggest otherwise, you're pretty much relying on a straw-man claim. I'm not trying to "justify" the murder of 3000 innocents, but I'm also not going to justify the murder of countless more in Afghanistan under ignorant claims that they are "naturally evil people". It's one thing to be "the most powerful country on Earth", but a completely different thing to flaunt it like the US.
Etular 1 week ago
@Etular just what in the hell do you think rome, greece, and egypt did? they flaunted the hell out of it. that just comes with the territory. it's sad but true. if i have to pick sides, i'm picking my own people. besides, everyone hates america these days anyway. don't get me wrong, half of the people's brains in this country have turned to mush but that doesn't mean i'm going to hop on the bandwagon of hating americans.
barudzija7 4 days ago
@Etular All three events are tragical. However, 9/11 was not a planned event, or a world wide happening. It targeted solely on America, and struck fear into Americans as they go about their every day lives. Now I may not be the most edumacated feller, but I can certainly say that 9/11 may not have killed as many people, but the idea of constant concern over when the next hi-jacking, or terrorist attack may occur left countless other humans, not just American's, insecure of their daily activities
mcginlit1190 2 months ago
@mcginlit1190 It's understandably how the use of media hype has blown this "threat" completely out of proportion (statistically, you're more likely to die falling down the stairs than by a terrorist attack), in order to justify the war against the aforementioned countries. The problem is, ofcourse, the media failing to pay much attention to this - benefiting from the people's fear, and slowly pushing them towards the paranoid belief that they should defend themselves from the invisible "threat".
Etular 2 months ago
@Etular unfortunately for you.... your opinion is shit
ricemancometh 2 months ago
@ricemancometh ...As well as being one of the top comments, shared by such Media-greats as Noam Chomsky, Michael Moore and Mark Curtis - all who became famous for being able to sufficiently back-up these anti-war views.
The only famous opposition to said views, for the most part, lies in the "Gawd Bless America!" Tea Party that still believes natural disasters are the work of God.
Etular 2 months ago
@Etular Michael Moore... there's one you want to compare your views to lol! He should be in a padded room and a straight jacket, provided they can find one big enough.
ricemancometh 2 months ago
OMFG!!! Call me a pussy all you want but as soon as I saw planes 3 and 4, I stopped the video. I knew what was about to happen and I just couldn't watch the rest. If 9/11 didn't happen at all, this might have made for a cool/effed up hollywood movie, but this shit is effffed up!
VivaLaKelsey 4 months ago
What's this gotta do with Macho Man Randy Savage? Fake and Gay.
slackmason 4 months ago 2
Nothing in this commercial is related...wtf?
johnsonms7 4 months ago
**ps. there is an article about it on agencyspy..
mew12mw 4 months ago
THIS AD IS A FAKE, and was never authorized by WWF!!!
WWF would never do something so disrespectful and tasteless..
mew12mw 4 months ago
Respect an earth that spits out natural disasters from time to time - and there is nothing we can do to stop them - earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes...
Did anyone in the boardroom ask what this advertisement's intention was? The selling point?? It's like some animator's sick dream... sad.
PenaltyKillah 4 months ago
how did they get away with this advert
mark1979able 4 months ago
This video is way out of line
MarkPatriots 4 months ago
I actually find this advert very interesting. I can fully understand the impact they are trying to have here. To me it seems they're not saying 9/11 was not a tragedy, they are also not comparing it to the tsunami. They are using 2 very horrifying events to bring to light the seriousness of a problem that is very prominent. No matter how shocking a man-made tragedy can be if we don't try to protect this world, the disaster will be much more catastrophic.
radientphoenix 4 months ago 3
@radientphoenix So it's a lack of respect that causes Tsunamis ??? No , this is exploitation plain and simple
Enturbulant 4 months ago
this is sick
icefalcon5 4 months ago
Thumbs up if you thought this was an advertisement from the REAL WWF and not this panda bullshit.
FragaLegacy 4 months ago 2
wow.....they actually went there
Egap548 4 months ago
World Wildlife Foundationg can go to hell. And if youre not down with that, then I've got two words for ya. SUCK ITTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
R.I.P. FDNY 343 NYPD 23 PAPD 37 Civilian 2203 NEVER FORGET
ffhawk1 4 months ago
anyone else thought this was a wrestiling advert?
JKM8511 4 months ago
Not cool.
soaringsolo 4 months ago
Hoh!! What if that did happen?? Sheeiittt...
robertiese 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hm, fail. Bad way to get a message across. But then again the WWF is bought and paid for and rarely even does anything for the environment.
loner1878 4 months ago
Hm, fail. Not a very good way to say something like that. But then again the WWF is bought and paid for and rarely even does anything for the environment .
loner1878 4 months ago
they just made the point that the earth is so powerful, and fuck america after afghanistan and iraq you lost the worlds sympathies for 9/11 because you illegally killed far more.
you allowed your leaders and the capitalist elite to strip you of your rights, drain your country of money and create vast debt, illegally start wars etc.
and you have the 2nd amendment, what were you thinking!
mapnxyaha2k10 4 months ago
You know, despite the fact that WWF is using disasters like these for their own propaganda (and they should know better, since 9/11 and the tsunami are understandably very personal subjects for many people) it does bring up a good point. Far more people died in the tsunami yet barely anything is heard about it in comparison. One could make a point that this video is an insult to 9/11 families, yet isn't it just as big an insult giving tsunami families the short end of the stick like this?
belsenwhistle 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
And this is why people hate environmentalists....
Bewzbucket 4 months ago 21
@Bewzbucket Environmentalists? I'm ashamed that there is even such a word. Everyone should care about our planet, not just a small group of "-ists" that goes against the stream. I consider this commercial unfortunate, but I am yet a bit disturbed at how people like you use this as a weapon against all people that care about Earth.
Sildesalaten 4 months ago
Repugnant, Ignorant WWF.
De-fund it now!
Complete disregard for human life, no decency for 911 families.
... and IGNORANT - In what way exactly is the tsunami ( caused by an earthquake) related or caused by human activity.... Idiot, stupid "activists"....
inbfra 4 months ago
u stupid fucks! ppl like u make me sick. i wanna stand in your face and beat the fuck out of you.! u mkae me sick.
mikehusky85 4 months ago
WORLD WRESTLING FEDERATION 4 LIFE
dillkidisback 4 months ago
see the terrorist are trolling us :o
animevidz4u 4 months ago
you guys are all FUCKING stupid. sure, it was a terrorist attack, but every day, more than 10 times that amount dies EVERY TEN SECONDS of any other cause, get over yourselves.
aahrg1234567890 4 months ago 3
@aahrg1234567890 that's not the point. 9/11 was carried out by people, the tsunami was caused by nature
OneManWolfPack44 4 months ago
Fuck you WWF, how dare you 9/11 to your own profit ??? AMERICANS as well as western countries paid most of the tsunamis aid.
Plus do you realize that a tsunami is a natural disaster ? 9/11 was human and religion stupidity!!! So 9/11 is for me 100 more tragic and cruel than your third world tsunami.
toocoolforu 4 months ago
actually, on 9/11, 2974 people died. get it right
legowarrior1233 4 months ago
fuck u wwf why the fuck would u use the 9 11 attack for ur stupid advertisment
509erock 4 months ago
I think this commercial makes a point we cared soo much on one minor thing and spend billions and billions of dollars...where as a natrual disaster causes 100 times more and only spend millions of dollars thats messed up! we need to take care of the earth! more than kill more people!
YdocN 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You've got to be shitting me ....
IH8URVIDEO1 4 months ago
How is this offensive at all? It's truthful, in the first place.
VBAadmin 4 months ago
@VBAadmin Seriously? Let me spell it out for you, since you're a non-thinking SHEEP: They are making an equivalent, moral or otherwise, of a natural disaster with the intentional mass MURDER of innocent people by OTHER non-thinking SHEEP who follow a warped religious code. AT BEST, it's a non sequitur and insensitive. But, honestly? It's fully expected from planet-hugging non-thinking sheep.
zilchsr 4 months ago 2
@zilchsr Wow, I'm sorry for whatever I've done to offend *you*. Why're you so upset? It's impolite to start a conversation by calling someone a sheep.
I still don't see how it's insensitive. People die daily; what causes an event has nothing to do with how bad the consequences are. The ends are what must incur reaction, since they're what create the terror in the first place.
For example, if both planes missed the WTC, there wouldn't be nearly as much of a fuss.
VBAadmin 4 months ago
@VBAadmin You remind me of that flight attendant character in the movie "Meet the Parents". You know ... that fake-smiley, over-reactor, accuse-you-of-being-hostile-even-though-you-have-a-smile-on-your-face type of projection? Yep .... that's you :-) I find it curious that you would label my observation that you're a sheep "being upset". It's an indication of your own projection and passive hostility.
zilchsr 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@VBAadmin You wrote: "I still don't see how it's insensitive". Exactly. You don't. SHEEP. LOL XD
zilchsr 4 months ago
@VBAadmin Additionally, who are YOU to be the arbiter of what "impolite" is? Who says calling someone a sheep is impolite? You ARE entitled to, of course, your own opinion ... just don't expect others to just accept your opinions as fact ... unless, of course, you WANT other people to be the same kind sheep that you are, blindly following the shepherd, whomever/whatever that is.
zilchsr 4 months ago
@zilchsr Alright, whatever. You're insulting me, judging me psychologically, asserting your superiority, and ignoring my point.
That's enough. Have a good night.
VBAadmin 4 months ago
@VBAadmin I am not insulting you, I'm observing that you're a non-thinking sheep. I don't judge you, there are times when I don't think, either. I'm also not ignoring your point ... I was responding to your point (evidence that I wasn't ignoring it) and seeing no reconciliation of your point(s) and the facts. Your claim I was asserting my superiority, yet, you close with "That's enough". MORE PROJECTION. You engage in the same thing for which you're admonishing me. Typical liberal sheep.
zilchsr 4 months ago
@VBAadmin Two contradictions that I would not share if not for the irony of the first. #1: You're apparently "OPPOSED TO INTERNET CENSORSHIP", yet you blast "that's enough" in an INTERNET comment-posting forum. #2: Apparently, your IQ is approx. 125-137? If so, this gives you NO excuse for acting like a groupthink sheep. You should be ashamed of yourself, because you should know better. Otherwise, surrender your Mensa card (sorry, you wouldn't qualify for Triple 9 Society with a 137 IQ)
zilchsr 4 months ago