Lord Clark discusses the matter in detail in his companion book to the series. Thing is, the TV show needed a short title, not a paragraph of explanation. He later said that he didn't imagine that anyone could think that he didn't know about the great civilizations of Rome or Greece or the East. He gave too much credit to a mass audience that will jump on anything they can make an issue of, for its own sake.
There is an extreme bias in this series, I am not going to say racist at all however there is a very Eurocentric point of view. How can any series about "Civilisation" be made without addressing Egypt, Sumer and Ur, Persia, the number system 0-9 which was invented India, Algebra from the Middle East, the preservation of mathematics by Arab civilisation. Is it because during this period in antiquity Europeans were still living in tribes and huts? Civilisation without Egypt=WOW!
@theone1087 I think the issue is that this series was only intended to cover European (or 'Western' if you will) civilisation of the past 1000 years: your critique applies equally well to the exclusion of ancient Roman and Greek civilisations. It seems fairly obvious that he doesn't mean to imply that European civilisation is the ONLY civilisation, but it is his topic of interest here. And yes, he doesn't bend over backwards to give a politically correct disclaimer clarifying that basic point
@floating00eye I intended my other comment to be a reply to your post floating00eye. Sorry I neglected to click on "Reply." BTW, this is an example of the way that all through the clips of Civilisation, someone has flagged every single negative comment as "spam". So the comment is hidden unless the reader explicitely shows it. This is a real bummer! These comments are negative, and I don't agree with them. But they ought to show up and be commented on, as you did. Thanks.
@Dannys998877 If you are referring to the "comments" by "theone...", then no, they do not need to be heeded. He is like a small child that is ignored because they are foolish and ignorant and always say the same thing over and over and over, ad infinitum, ad nauseam. They do it to be spiteful because they have been rightfully ignored. An ignorant lightweight is beneath contempt and "theone..." fits that description spendidly. Visit it's subscription site and see for yourself. He and it are jokes
Lord Clark discusses the matter in detail in his companion book to the series. Thing is, the TV show needed a short title, not a paragraph of explanation. He later said that he didn't imagine that anyone could think that he didn't know about the great civilizations of Rome or Greece or the East. He gave too much credit to a mass audience that will jump on anything they can make an issue of, for its own sake.
Dannys998877 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is an extreme bias in this series, I am not going to say racist at all however there is a very Eurocentric point of view. How can any series about "Civilisation" be made without addressing Egypt, Sumer and Ur, Persia, the number system 0-9 which was invented India, Algebra from the Middle East, the preservation of mathematics by Arab civilisation. Is it because during this period in antiquity Europeans were still living in tribes and huts? Civilisation without Egypt=WOW!
theone1087 1 year ago
@theone1087 I think the issue is that this series was only intended to cover European (or 'Western' if you will) civilisation of the past 1000 years: your critique applies equally well to the exclusion of ancient Roman and Greek civilisations. It seems fairly obvious that he doesn't mean to imply that European civilisation is the ONLY civilisation, but it is his topic of interest here. And yes, he doesn't bend over backwards to give a politically correct disclaimer clarifying that basic point
floating00eye 1 year ago
@floating00eye I intended my other comment to be a reply to your post floating00eye. Sorry I neglected to click on "Reply." BTW, this is an example of the way that all through the clips of Civilisation, someone has flagged every single negative comment as "spam". So the comment is hidden unless the reader explicitely shows it. This is a real bummer! These comments are negative, and I don't agree with them. But they ought to show up and be commented on, as you did. Thanks.
Dannys998877 11 months ago
@Dannys998877 If you are referring to the "comments" by "theone...", then no, they do not need to be heeded. He is like a small child that is ignored because they are foolish and ignorant and always say the same thing over and over and over, ad infinitum, ad nauseam. They do it to be spiteful because they have been rightfully ignored. An ignorant lightweight is beneath contempt and "theone..." fits that description spendidly. Visit it's subscription site and see for yourself. He and it are jokes
vinha1006 10 months ago