"Nature" has property rights? Does it pay taxes? Can it appoint representatives, or do certain "chosen people" just know that they speak for "nature"?
actually there are tons of trees and places to be in nature where we live. we are trying to make are city a better place and development is part of it. development is a good thing or are city wouldnt be what it is. so if u have a problem with are city growing maybe u should hug a tree.
WE also if I might addrees this, we also have a huge problem directly in our Watershed here in Grand River Country, particularly in Brantford where I am presently working on a Project regarding the direct impact development is having on D'Aubigny Creek, and consequerntly into the "Exceptional Waters" of the Grand River.
Ironically the development that is affecting D'Aubigny is directly related to what this video above speaks to. The lands were once farmed and now are replaced with row houses.
"No more agriculture"? Last I checked, food was a basic human need, so as long as people need and want food, there will be a high demand for it, and a correspondingly high likelihood that others will anticipate a profit from producing this elusive good.
That is, of course assuming the young lady decides whether it belongs to the natives or nature.
In BRANT, Six Nations have claims on the land in question, which is along the river trail. Land bankers and financial consortiums from other countries have bought up huge tracks of farmland in and around BRANT county, which does threaten our food security, especially since this are provides much of the food to the Greater Toronto area.
So in the name of economic protectionism, we should delegate our "food security" to the Six Nations? Since it is allegedly *their* land, can they starve us, or can we depend on their pity?
development is good
OfficalLillyManager 3 years ago
in ways
1mileyc1hmfan 3 years ago
Actually not really...If its killing Trees & Taking Up Land that Belongs To Nature
mc1hm1rock 3 years ago
"Nature" has property rights? Does it pay taxes? Can it appoint representatives, or do certain "chosen people" just know that they speak for "nature"?
Bosco20061217 3 years ago
actually there are tons of trees and places to be in nature where we live. we are trying to make are city a better place and development is part of it. development is a good thing or are city wouldnt be what it is. so if u have a problem with are city growing maybe u should hug a tree.
1mileyc1hmfan 3 years ago
ah lol Like Some of need to Know Its Reality
mc1hm1rock 3 years ago
WE also if I might addrees this, we also have a huge problem directly in our Watershed here in Grand River Country, particularly in Brantford where I am presently working on a Project regarding the direct impact development is having on D'Aubigny Creek, and consequerntly into the "Exceptional Waters" of the Grand River.
Ironically the development that is affecting D'Aubigny is directly related to what this video above speaks to. The lands were once farmed and now are replaced with row houses.
timmerbigeyes 3 years ago
"No more agriculture"? Last I checked, food was a basic human need, so as long as people need and want food, there will be a high demand for it, and a correspondingly high likelihood that others will anticipate a profit from producing this elusive good.
That is, of course assuming the young lady decides whether it belongs to the natives or nature.
Bosco20061217 3 years ago
In BRANT, Six Nations have claims on the land in question, which is along the river trail. Land bankers and financial consortiums from other countries have bought up huge tracks of farmland in and around BRANT county, which does threaten our food security, especially since this are provides much of the food to the Greater Toronto area.
tgloyn16 3 years ago
So in the name of economic protectionism, we should delegate our "food security" to the Six Nations? Since it is allegedly *their* land, can they starve us, or can we depend on their pity?
Bosco20061217 3 years ago