The detailed response to Calzada by ISTAS can be found at its website. Main findings include 1. Lack of scientific rigor (2) The ideology of the document prevents scientific analysis (3) It uses a bad definition of green jobs (4) It ignores the actual profitability of investments in renovables(5) the report ignores the Spanish FiT scheme (6) it ignores the declining costs of renewable energy (7) doesnt consider environmental externalities (8) wind energy cuts wholesale price of electricity
I swear this truly is the funniest thing I have ever read - Check it out:
The proposal -- frequently referred to as a cap-and-trade plan -- would establish an emissions trading system that would permit companies that emit fewer greenhouse gases than they are allowed to sell the excess portion to companies that exceed their allowances
I can't wait to see what happens after the September Bank Holiday!
Just love imput from people like savetheworldtech who is from Australia. I'm sure he doesn't care if HR 2454 destroys our economy in the US. I also see the youtube nazi's block post they don't like.
HR 2454 will just add to the destruction of our economy. The new buzz word now for Global Warming is Climate Change. No real discussion is being held on supposed climate change and it should be before we spend billions based on computer model projections. HR 2454 will cost the average american family over $3000 a year in additional energy cost and in the end won't really impact the climate all that much. This is just another example of wasteful spending from Obama and the liberals.
This guy is a fool. The tech boom was suppose to create millions of job losses. It did infect create more jobs. The green boom will too, only it won't burst like the tech did, it can't. It will grow. Climate change is here for good. This is not a faze of growth. Its a new world. Retain for green jobs if you think you are going to lose yours. We need to adapt and move to an environmentally friendly attitude. This guy should wipe his chin after he dribbles..
These republicans are in the pocket of big oil and coal so of course they are against green jobs. Id like to hear what their constituents have to say on this subject.
These hypocrites already sent all the traditional jobs overseas in the name of 'free trade.'
sweetbread 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The detailed response to Calzada by ISTAS can be found at its website. Main findings include 1. Lack of scientific rigor (2) The ideology of the document prevents scientific analysis (3) It uses a bad definition of green jobs (4) It ignores the actual profitability of investments in renovables(5) the report ignores the Spanish FiT scheme (6) it ignores the declining costs of renewable energy (7) doesnt consider environmental externalities (8) wind energy cuts wholesale price of electricity
MuchoDoctorJ 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I swear this truly is the funniest thing I have ever read - Check it out:
The proposal -- frequently referred to as a cap-and-trade plan -- would establish an emissions trading system that would permit companies that emit fewer greenhouse gases than they are allowed to sell the excess portion to companies that exceed their allowances
I can't wait to see what happens after the September Bank Holiday!
sugarpuddin88 2 years ago
Just love imput from people like savetheworldtech who is from Australia. I'm sure he doesn't care if HR 2454 destroys our economy in the US. I also see the youtube nazi's block post they don't like.
AMXBOY 2 years ago
EVERYONE that voted for this "Cap and Tax" should be voted out asap!
Time to call/ write/ email all our Senators to stop their vote on this.
United States Senate - (202) 224-3121
Let's put the pressure on and not stop until they vote this one down!
timmunst 2 years ago
HR 2454 will just add to the destruction of our economy. The new buzz word now for Global Warming is Climate Change. No real discussion is being held on supposed climate change and it should be before we spend billions based on computer model projections. HR 2454 will cost the average american family over $3000 a year in additional energy cost and in the end won't really impact the climate all that much. This is just another example of wasteful spending from Obama and the liberals.
AMXBOY 2 years ago
What traditional jobs is he talking about, there are none. They're all gone.
dapple33 2 years ago
exactly, because the jerks want it to energy expensive to force you to use less.
China keeps fucking laughing at us.
It's fucking cheaper to produce goods in China tha in Al Gore's United States.
It's the fucking crazy nuts like Al Gore who is shoving the HR 2454 bill up your mother fucking ass
TheLiberalssuckdick 2 years ago
This guy is a fool. The tech boom was suppose to create millions of job losses. It did infect create more jobs. The green boom will too, only it won't burst like the tech did, it can't. It will grow. Climate change is here for good. This is not a faze of growth. Its a new world. Retain for green jobs if you think you are going to lose yours. We need to adapt and move to an environmentally friendly attitude. This guy should wipe his chin after he dribbles..
savetheworldtech 2 years ago
Because this bill is a hoax, this is treason,
it will destroy the middle class.
jmjfanss 2 years ago
LMAO These dinosaurs are speaking with forked tongues.
kimberleycalling 2 years ago 2
These republicans are in the pocket of big oil and coal so of course they are against green jobs. Id like to hear what their constituents have to say on this subject.
OhioDemocrat 2 years ago