@intlkeyboards The biggest piece of evidence that the event is not what it appears, is that it is being headlined on all MSM channels. Wait for the propaganda. And as usual, the elements of the official story are ridiculous.
@LifePsyop Any guesses about what type of propaganda will be pushed? I was in Italy in 1999, and even than everybody had a cell phone. So if it's real there ought to be dozens of videos by passengers. All I can find is the recycled footage of the ship on it's side. Doesn't look real to me.
@intlkeyboards Yes, funny how that works isn't it? Where we should have hundreds of amateur footage we have 1 or 2 videos. And these always seem to be filtered through AP. Even the pictures on some "amateur" flickr account come from AP.
The propaganda? Not sure. It does feel like it's evoking memories of the Lusitania or Maine or Titanic. Headlines of Americans being killed in a cruiseliner in foreign waters.
@LifePsyop English may be the universal language of cursing. So maybe they chose the name captain Shettino, so comics everywhere can tell shitty jokes. The media often casts the captain as the villain.
Only 249 death certificates with not a single one having last address of residence. Not a single plane part out of up to 3 million individually numbered on each plane matched & individually verified as matched at any of the 4 9/11 crash sites. All videos both pro & so-called 'amateur' proven fakes. Never mind no black boxes found but not even the original serial numbers on them which has never happened before or since? Whole thing is a joke. Great video. How come Shack never does any audios?
@BrooklynShooter Were you watching 9/11 on TV? If so, then Yes, it was an illusion. It's called computer generated imagery and it is not real, only digital pixels.
@elbuggo lots of media trickery,indeed. i have heard that nypd already had the area roped off before the towers came down and the footage we saw of ppl staring up at the towers/running from dust piles was faked. but what i am not clear on is the demolition footage. why would they need to fake that and what would it have looked like otherwise? isnt a building coming down a building coming down? id be interested in hearing your thoughts on this,elbuggo. peace1
@sunchimedia There were also reports of WTC workers being denied entry that morning due to a fire drill.
The demolition footage had to look like a perfect top-down collapse with that ridiculous shroud of debris spraying everywhere. It would be a video that would be analyzed by thousands of people so I doubt they would have left it to chance. The real collapse probably looked more like a classic controlled demolition.
@LifePsyop thanks. another thing, i saw a video of a ytuber debunking 'twoofers'. the footage had close up of helicoptor then shows the building collapse. you could hear the heli but no explosions. therfore he concluded that it couldnt have been controlled demo bc you heard no explosions lol as if a soundtrack could not be replaced. interesting work is being done on letsroll forums,esp the hollow tower thoeries imo...peace1
@LifePsyop Yeah but how do you explain 'the bathtubs' that had to remain intact in order for Manhattan not to be flooded which would have happend with standard 'controlled demolition' & 500,000 tons of concrete & steel hitting it. as Judy Wood shows in her book. Only WTC 7 was ouside the 'bathtub.' Also, how do you explain the low seismic footprints from many stations & the ultra fine sub-micron dust actually found? How about the 1000s of toasted cars, all the paper not burning, etc. ?
@metamorphosis67 Those are all interesting things to study, unfortunately most if not all of it relies on the assumption that the aftermath photographs are authentic and untampered with. They could have been produced specifically to create a nuclear demolition rabbit hole with Judy Wood ready to fill the role. Even if hypothetically it really was nukes, they would be of little importance. The main issue would still be media manipulation for keeping this monstrous lie alive for a decade now.
@LifePsyop Judy Wood doesn't hypothesize nukes but DEW or Directed Energy Weapons. Even assuming every last photo & video of entire event was faked & no one allowed to take photos & video of their own, it still remains that the Towers couldn't come down in controlled demo chunks because of where the buildings were erected, in 2 bathtubs. Inevitable flooding of Manhattan would follow their destruction. That physically did not happen independent of any photo/video, therefore no controlled demo.
@metamorphosis67 I feel the same way about Directed Energy as I do about Controlled Demolition. It's a rabbit hole that leads nowhere. Assuming you convince a million people they were destroyed by DEW, then what? What changes? Nothing. What happened to the buildings matters very little to me. However the media control is holding the 9/11 hoax in place to this day, running stories on fake victims, fake witnesses, etc. etc. It's a joke. 9/11 is just one Psyop of many.
@LifePsyop Millions of people are already convinced it was an 'inside job' & media lied about how the event went down & even BBC admitted Al Queda never existed, what changed? Nothing. If a million more start believing everything Shack proves in September Clues &/or some of what Ace Baker proves in 9/11 Psy-Opera about No-Planes, then what? Nothing. But all these people together will eventually accomplish the individual consciousness overhaul needed for real change, as Michael Tsarion says.
@metamorphosis67 You're right, it's not going to change anything, at least short term. I think the more people become aware that media is propaganda that is controlling their opinions and views on things, the more we will be able to have real skeptical, rational, discussions about what's going on in the world. Society has been swallowing loads of BS from the mainstream for many decades now, and are more distracted now with trivia than probably ever in history.
@sunchimedia - Why they had to fake all the videos of the demolitions? Because they could screw up the real demolition. And if you fake the whole thing you can make it much more spectacular like in a Hollywood studio horror movie (fake) and you have much better control. What if the real demolition was really boring? A flimsy top 1/10 cannot crush a much stronger and bigger lower part by gravity - impossible. Google The Heiwa Challenge.
@sunchimedia - One of the most important reasons for faking the collapse videos in a Hollywood studio was to make the collapse sequence consistent with the rest of the story. Hard to explain something that looked like a normal demolition when they had in their script that it was caused by plane crashes and fires.
@elbuggo thanks! i wonder how many people saw it with their own eyes from around the city.i wonder if they look at the videos and see anything different.anyhow,i dontt doubt that they would do such a thing after ALL the evidence i have seen of trickery on that day concerning the events.from the fake smoke to the bbc and a usa station reporting collapse of 7 b4 it hapnd. from vicsims to lack of the normal things one would expect to find in the piles of rubble.and all the actors. peace1
@sunchimedia I doubt the memory of one instant in time stood much of a chance against the onslaught of 24/7 video propaganda that was waiting on the other side. Electronic jamming, which is a common military practice, would have neutralized any cameras in the area. Unfortunately we'll never know exactly how they pulled it off, but it is easy to see the fakery nonetheless.
Have you seen the news about the Costa Concordia capsizing? Seen any evidence it was faked?
intlkeyboards 1 month ago
@intlkeyboards The biggest piece of evidence that the event is not what it appears, is that it is being headlined on all MSM channels. Wait for the propaganda. And as usual, the elements of the official story are ridiculous.
LifePsyop 1 month ago
@LifePsyop Any guesses about what type of propaganda will be pushed? I was in Italy in 1999, and even than everybody had a cell phone. So if it's real there ought to be dozens of videos by passengers. All I can find is the recycled footage of the ship on it's side. Doesn't look real to me.
intlkeyboards 1 month ago
@intlkeyboards Yes, funny how that works isn't it? Where we should have hundreds of amateur footage we have 1 or 2 videos. And these always seem to be filtered through AP. Even the pictures on some "amateur" flickr account come from AP.
The propaganda? Not sure. It does feel like it's evoking memories of the Lusitania or Maine or Titanic. Headlines of Americans being killed in a cruiseliner in foreign waters.
LifePsyop 1 month ago
@LifePsyop English may be the universal language of cursing. So maybe they chose the name captain Shettino, so comics everywhere can tell shitty jokes. The media often casts the captain as the villain.
intlkeyboards 1 month ago
Now THIS is a great "mash-up" - if you ask me. Well done, LifePsyop ! :O)
simonshack 3 months ago
@simonshack Thanks, Simon. Your research has been of great assistance :)
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@LifePsyop I'm hoping for some new work from you.. I subbed you because I like the fact you think outside the BOX.. grate vid's keep them coming ..
EACH0NETEACH0NE 1 month ago
Only 249 death certificates with not a single one having last address of residence. Not a single plane part out of up to 3 million individually numbered on each plane matched & individually verified as matched at any of the 4 9/11 crash sites. All videos both pro & so-called 'amateur' proven fakes. Never mind no black boxes found but not even the original serial numbers on them which has never happened before or since? Whole thing is a joke. Great video. How come Shack never does any audios?
metamorphosis67 3 months ago
So What I saw was an illusion,..... Wow that was an awsome magic trick. Dont forget the moon landing..
BrooklynShooter 4 months ago
@BrooklynShooter Were you watching 9/11 on TV? If so, then Yes, it was an illusion. It's called computer generated imagery and it is not real, only digital pixels.
LifePsyop 4 months ago
great video btw!
sunchimedia 4 months ago
Great work man :)!!! Keep it up!
DangerMusicTube 4 months ago
Only a few demolitions was real - the rest was faked - including all the victims.
elbuggo 4 months ago
@elbuggo Media hoax of the century.
LifePsyop 4 months ago
@elbuggo lots of media trickery,indeed. i have heard that nypd already had the area roped off before the towers came down and the footage we saw of ppl staring up at the towers/running from dust piles was faked. but what i am not clear on is the demolition footage. why would they need to fake that and what would it have looked like otherwise? isnt a building coming down a building coming down? id be interested in hearing your thoughts on this,elbuggo. peace1
sunchimedia 4 months ago
@sunchimedia There were also reports of WTC workers being denied entry that morning due to a fire drill.
The demolition footage had to look like a perfect top-down collapse with that ridiculous shroud of debris spraying everywhere. It would be a video that would be analyzed by thousands of people so I doubt they would have left it to chance. The real collapse probably looked more like a classic controlled demolition.
LifePsyop 4 months ago
@LifePsyop thanks. another thing, i saw a video of a ytuber debunking 'twoofers'. the footage had close up of helicoptor then shows the building collapse. you could hear the heli but no explosions. therfore he concluded that it couldnt have been controlled demo bc you heard no explosions lol as if a soundtrack could not be replaced. interesting work is being done on letsroll forums,esp the hollow tower thoeries imo...peace1
sunchimedia 4 months ago
@LifePsyop Yeah but how do you explain 'the bathtubs' that had to remain intact in order for Manhattan not to be flooded which would have happend with standard 'controlled demolition' & 500,000 tons of concrete & steel hitting it. as Judy Wood shows in her book. Only WTC 7 was ouside the 'bathtub.' Also, how do you explain the low seismic footprints from many stations & the ultra fine sub-micron dust actually found? How about the 1000s of toasted cars, all the paper not burning, etc. ?
metamorphosis67 3 months ago
@metamorphosis67 Those are all interesting things to study, unfortunately most if not all of it relies on the assumption that the aftermath photographs are authentic and untampered with. They could have been produced specifically to create a nuclear demolition rabbit hole with Judy Wood ready to fill the role. Even if hypothetically it really was nukes, they would be of little importance. The main issue would still be media manipulation for keeping this monstrous lie alive for a decade now.
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@LifePsyop Judy Wood doesn't hypothesize nukes but DEW or Directed Energy Weapons. Even assuming every last photo & video of entire event was faked & no one allowed to take photos & video of their own, it still remains that the Towers couldn't come down in controlled demo chunks because of where the buildings were erected, in 2 bathtubs. Inevitable flooding of Manhattan would follow their destruction. That physically did not happen independent of any photo/video, therefore no controlled demo.
metamorphosis67 3 months ago
@metamorphosis67 I feel the same way about Directed Energy as I do about Controlled Demolition. It's a rabbit hole that leads nowhere. Assuming you convince a million people they were destroyed by DEW, then what? What changes? Nothing. What happened to the buildings matters very little to me. However the media control is holding the 9/11 hoax in place to this day, running stories on fake victims, fake witnesses, etc. etc. It's a joke. 9/11 is just one Psyop of many.
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@LifePsyop Millions of people are already convinced it was an 'inside job' & media lied about how the event went down & even BBC admitted Al Queda never existed, what changed? Nothing. If a million more start believing everything Shack proves in September Clues &/or some of what Ace Baker proves in 9/11 Psy-Opera about No-Planes, then what? Nothing. But all these people together will eventually accomplish the individual consciousness overhaul needed for real change, as Michael Tsarion says.
metamorphosis67 3 months ago
@metamorphosis67 You're right, it's not going to change anything, at least short term. I think the more people become aware that media is propaganda that is controlling their opinions and views on things, the more we will be able to have real skeptical, rational, discussions about what's going on in the world. Society has been swallowing loads of BS from the mainstream for many decades now, and are more distracted now with trivia than probably ever in history.
LifePsyop 3 months ago
@sunchimedia - Why they had to fake all the videos of the demolitions? Because they could screw up the real demolition. And if you fake the whole thing you can make it much more spectacular like in a Hollywood studio horror movie (fake) and you have much better control. What if the real demolition was really boring? A flimsy top 1/10 cannot crush a much stronger and bigger lower part by gravity - impossible. Google The Heiwa Challenge.
elbuggo 4 months ago
@sunchimedia - One of the most important reasons for faking the collapse videos in a Hollywood studio was to make the collapse sequence consistent with the rest of the story. Hard to explain something that looked like a normal demolition when they had in their script that it was caused by plane crashes and fires.
elbuggo 4 months ago
@elbuggo thanks! i wonder how many people saw it with their own eyes from around the city.i wonder if they look at the videos and see anything different.anyhow,i dontt doubt that they would do such a thing after ALL the evidence i have seen of trickery on that day concerning the events.from the fake smoke to the bbc and a usa station reporting collapse of 7 b4 it hapnd. from vicsims to lack of the normal things one would expect to find in the piles of rubble.and all the actors. peace1
sunchimedia 4 months ago
@sunchimedia I doubt the memory of one instant in time stood much of a chance against the onslaught of 24/7 video propaganda that was waiting on the other side. Electronic jamming, which is a common military practice, would have neutralized any cameras in the area. Unfortunately we'll never know exactly how they pulled it off, but it is easy to see the fakery nonetheless.
LifePsyop 4 months ago