What Would I Recommend To The New President (NASA climatologist James Hansen)

[mathewjohn5174]

the politicians are funded by oil lobbyists, so there's no way, during office, that you can get them to change the way they do things.

[questioneverything2]

Al Gore's Science advisor; James Hansen, NASA's highly recognized MMGW expert was documented in 1971 as being highly active in the Global Ice age movement, a flip in his highly educated opinion. An embarrassed NASA having to recently revise historical US temperature data downward that Hansen himself compiled as a fraudulent report or at the very least misdirected. 5 hottest years before WWII

[starrdreams]

questioneverything2 - regarding James Hansen "activism" in "Global Ice age movement" in 1971, it is misinterpretation.

Search in Google "Swift-Boating James Hansen" and click link to Climate Progress website. There you will find James Hansen's answer and explanation what real situation was. There is also link to his article regarding this misinterpretation.

Wish you success in looking for the truth

[questioneverything2]

I would like to reply if you wouldn't screen my comments

[questioneverything2]

By the way starrdreams, that is James Hansen rebuttal. While you are at it why don't you ask any inmate in prison if they are guilty of the crime they are accused of? I'm sure their answer would be, "no I am not."

[starrdreams]

Can you clarify what do you mean by saying "that is James Hansen rebuttal"?

[questioneverything2]

You ask, what I mean by James Hansen rebuttal? What I mean is that this is his explanation of a very embarrassing situation, which I am sure he would like to have go away. So naturally he would try to distance himself from a Global Ice Age.

[starrdreams]

Can you clarify where and when he said about Global Ice Age?

[starrdreams]

questioneverything2 - regarding "embarrassed NASA having to recently revise historical US temperature data downward" and "Hansen himself compiled as a fraudulent report" - search in Wikipedia "James Hansen", go to his page and you will find answer under title "Correcting Climate Record Database".

Hansen states that the difference between the 1934 and 1998 temperatures is insignificant and that the adjustment effect on the global temperature record is invisible.

[questioneverything2]

I am well aware of James Hansen past history with the coming Ice Age, he made the charts and one of his associates published the report he has his ties to that report and the falsified NASA document that is suppose to be a Y2K glitch when that so call glitch affected no other computers. More bull than anyone else can give out except for the IPCC graphs of 1989 that included the medieval worm period and later removed in more resent graphs. Where did it go?

[starrdreams]

Is there evidence that "he has his ties to that report and the falsified NASA document"

[starrdreams]

As I know Medieval warm period was local.

[questioneverything2]

The Medieval warm period was not a local event it was a world wide event it was a common consensus till the United Nation's IPCC tried to make it disappear it is in the ice core drilling records and tree ring growth records. I believe that is why you said, "As I know Medieval warm period..." because you do know that it was world wide warming.

[starrdreams]

What are evidence that Medieval warm period was not global event and on what they are based?

Latest (September 2008) research shows that "The planet is hotter now than it has been for nearly the past 2,000 years".

[questioneverything2]

starrdreams, Do a Google search "medieval warm tree rings" You will find many locations where the Medieval warming is found in tree rings, from the United States to China and the Orient.

[starrdreams]

Oh, ok. So what was cause of that warm period? Is it the same as today?

[questioneverything2]

It would be foolish to assume that because we average a mere 1/10 of a degree warmer than the Medieval Warm period today, that it can't be a natural accruing phenomenon. Today is as normal as it was in the MWP.

[starrdreams]

>> we average a mere 1/10 of a degree warmer than the Medieval Warm period today

So. it is warmer. Why?

>>Today is as normal as it was in the MWP.

But what was the cause of rising of temperature? Is there no difference? And will it stop today as at that time? No, and that's the difference.

[questioneverything2]

The UK Meteorological Office's Hadley Center for Climate Studies Had-Crut data shows worldwide temperatures declining since 1998.Two widely used global temperature data sources are from earth-orbiting satellites UAH and RSS. Both show decreasing temperatures over the last decade, present temperatures barely at 30 year average. Canadian statistician Steve McIntyre has been tracking the changes closely on his Climate Audit site, and reports that NASA is Rewriting History, Time and Time Again.

[starrdreams]

>> The UK Meteorological Office's Hadley Center for Climate Studies Had-Crut data shows worldwide temperatures declining since 1998

UK Meteo Office have this message on their website: "There is indisputable evidence from observations that the Earth is warming."

Go to MET Office website, click "Climate change" link on left side, on next page click link "The big picture" on left side - you will find there everything what they are saying about temperature change, climate change etc.

[questioneverything2]

To clarify this subject it is necessary to define what the period of time we are talking about, temps of the last 8 years the earth is cooling if the UK Meteo office uses a longer time period say the last 100 years than we are warming up. My point is if 38 PPM of MM CO2 is driving temps up, than temps shouldn't be cooling unless that tiny amount of the earth's MMCO2 doesn't drive up earth's temps and it is all natural, just what I have been saying NO MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING!!

[starrdreams]

Temperature change for a few years it's still can be weather, not climate change. So for sure MET saying about long-time period. You should look at their page - all answers there.

[questioneverything2]

Well as you know, he tried to tie it to a Y2K problem. Where as the 10 warmest days in the USA are 5 before WWII and 5 in the1990's. The other problem is that the temperatures were taken from faulty data. From thermometers which are subjected to Urban Island warming. As a research scientist he should base his conclusions on facts and not be too hastily, waiting for further reviews from follow-up studies. This whole MMGW panic attack is all too HASTY !!

[starrdreams]

.

Check description for links ->>

.