wow what a pos....turbo....21psi....cam n rods...300hp......weak lol....my 95 accord coupe h22 turbo 5spd 22psi making over 440whp....now thats an import....not ur little gay ass 1.6l....lmfao pussy
@prosurfer2222 Man i dont know you but im damn tired of people talking shit for no good reason. Of course your motor is making more power on the same boost and i bet you dont even know why, ya dumb fuck. i hope your fat ass h22 blows the fuck up. d series all the way bitch
hp is the only energy the car is producing. here is a metaphor i always try to tell people. Think of TQ as hourly wage. Say, 10$/hr. RPm is how many hours a week you work. To say that 10$/hr is better than 8$/hr only if the rpm's or hours per week are the same. Either way, rpms x tq = power. Or in money, $/hr x hrs per week = income. There is no such think as tq works off the line, and hp is top speed thing... thats retards. Energy in = energy out. To make something faster, INCREASE HP!
well thats true. but i was referring to the mass is constant. so of course moving less mass means more acceleration. Force = mass x accelerate. so your statement is true, but i was referring to someone argueing that 250hp@250tq is better than 250hp@225tq... both do the same work at that specific rpm.. both can do 250hp worth of work. but moving less mass means more energy goes towards acceleration..
its because top speed is either limited by air resistance or gearing. and in those cases, wt is not a factor. removing wt will not reduce the air resistance...
hp is the ability to use and understand gearing. but more hp always means more wheel tq.... increasing crank tq withOUT increasing hp will do absolutely nothing.
100tq@8000rpms is the same as 800tq@1000rpms. Becuase of gearing. if 1st gear for both cars was needed to reach 1000rpms. The 800tq car would use 1:1 gearing, netting 800tq. The 100tq car, would use 8:1 gearing. Thus reducing the rpms by 8 = 1000. this would increase the tq output by 8 = 800. hence why they both produce the same power. HP is tq @ rotation speed/ velocity. hp determines how fast something can be. increasing crank tq without increasing hp is 100% pointless. Hp always wins.
Think of torque as the physical manifestation of power, while horsepower is leaning towards the velocity side of things. It's easier to produce a heavier physical power output with a heavier rotating mass than a lighter ones. Thats why honda's dont exactly rumble the ground at idle.
Torque is what gets you there, horsepower keeps you there / sort of. With a smaller displacement motor as a 16V (this one) measuring almost 200ci > 21psi or not (you can imput any variable here, the reality is still the same) that you are going to want horsepower and torque as even and as close as possible. If they were the same thing, they wouldn't be measuring them independantly of each other.
im going ot have to agree with vaders50 in this one theres a old saying torque is what wins races horsepower wins girls phone numbers i drive 18 wheelers for years and when the engine have 500 hp and 800lbsTQ because WHY because he neends more TQ to GET IT UP TO SPEED for the HORSEPOWER to keep it there thats why any dyno readying you look at the TQ always starts off higher then HP passes it
Next time you want to comment hellcat320 learn your fucking shit you moron
there is a reason why u drive truck. TAke it from an engineer. The energy in (500hp) is what is moving your semi. ur tires do not see crank tq. Because gearing changes it. How fast you can accelerate a mass is based on energy i.e. hp.The amount of tq/hp ratio is only based on rpm range. 500hp does the same amount of work as any other 500hp regardless of crank tq. IF 500hp can do more work than another 500hp, then ur creating energy and thus breaking every law of physics. Stay with driving trucks
the reason why tq starts higher is becuase power is based on 2 factors. RPM and TQ. 1000lbs of tq@1 rpm wont much work. 1000lbs@10,000rpms will do 10,000 times more work. the only reason why they cross at 5250rpm is because the amount of energy in 1 hp was determined to be a certain amount. You can create your own unit of power. Say kitten power. and instead of using 5250, say its tqxrpm/525 instead. as long as you label the unit right, then its correct.
having 2 times the rpms, means you can use 2 times smaller gears to increase the tq output by 2. Thus it has 2 times the power. to make 1000lbs of tq at the wheel at 100mph requires 2 times more power than 1000lbs of tq@ the wheel at 50mph.
hp is tq@ velocity. IT would be much easier to think of it like this. 400hp produces 400hp worth of tq. Since knowing the amount of hp and rpm, you can thus go backwards and figure out the tq output. more hp always creates more tq at all rpm outputs..
the term "whp" is 100% pointless to even aim for. Since power is two variables, aiming for high tq will lead you down the road of a turbo diesel. If you aim the other way, and get a weedwacker. Both have great characterists of 1/2 of the equation. getting the tq of a turbo desiel and the rpm range of a weed wacker... would net power 6-7 times the power of a f1 car.... so its a balance between the two... Both are related by a set of mathematical calculations... just plz use whp, not wtq
for everyone that reads this.. please understand the term "whp" is referring to the idea of, ex... if the car made 200lbs of crank tq. But since it has a power loss of 13%, it would make "174lbs of tq" at the crank. but since this term incorporates drive loss, its stated at "wheel tq" because its after the transmition/power loss. Unfortunetly that not what the car has at the wheel. For simply changing gears greatly changes the tq output at the wheel. Hense why 1st gear is faster than 5th.
the car doesnt have 164 lbs of tq at the wheel... if it did. with a car that weights 3000lbs, means 164/3000= .054666... That means that if it actually had, 164lbs of tq at the wheel and the car weighed 3000lbs.. THE MOST it could accelerate is 5.46% the speed of gravity. Which is about 1.77 feet per second, per second. Do you mean to tell me that it takes 3 seconds to go 12 feet? obviously something else is going on.. and its a reduction in shaft speed = incrase of wheel tq.
first off. think about this moron. a moving car is kinetic energy. Mass times velocity squared. To make the mass move faster in a given time period POWER must be inputted, via engine. This is coined HP. talking about crank tq is 100% pointless when your talking about how much energy a motor can put into the system (being the moving car, plus heat loss etc.).You just sound really dumb when you obviously have not look into the hp/tq argument outside of reading page36 in hot rod mag. Educate urself
are you going to actually learn something or speak like your a tv commercial on repeat, your whole life? V8 has tq, = to displacement/ air mass per stroke. that IS NOT POWER!. it is air mass/time. Hense 1L@2rpms is the same air volume as 2L@1rpm. Based on the same air mixture, roughly, 25% of the fuel will be turned into kinetic energy. having MORe tq from a v8/larger displacement motor, JUSt adds TQ. and thus, if it could rev as high as the I$ as mentioned, then yes. The v8 Would own
obviously you dont understand. Adding displacement add tq... which some could look at it as a potential ability to make a lot of power, ONLY if it revved high. there is a replacement for displacement... its called rpm! Since power is TWO variables, then adding "tq" is only 1/2 of the equation. One could also say, there is no replacement for RPMS. a car that produces the same amount of tq would make more power by revving higher. so "replacement for displcement" is what ignorant car guys say...
another thing. gearing is such that your tires are spinning at a ratio slower (equal overall gear ratio) than the crank. Such as 16:1 for a 1st geared honda. first gear times final. what that means, is when you reduce the revs by 2x amount. you get 2x's the tq output. hence, 7,500rpmx164lbst=1,230,000units of energy. First overal gear ratio= 16:1 so 7,500/16=468rpms(peak 1st gear tire rpm) so tq output=; 1,230,000/468=2628lbs tq. As you see. referring to 164tq in this case is POINTLESS. USE WHP
in a car with an actual 1:1 gear ratio ( probably equal to a 350mph top speed in 5th gear), would have 164lbs of tq. But their is not 1 gear in a car, that is not reduced rpm by a factor of atleast 2.5 or more. That means, a morern car, has a tire tq output not lower than 2.5 times that tq at the crank. If you can't understand that gear reduction ( gearing) multiplies tq output, then stop trying to make fun of vehicles like a 8yr old child who just learned the first 1,000 digits of numbers.
shoulda gone ramhorn would have been in the mid 300's for sure the log manifold is horrible
91DAintegraB20 1 year ago
cant wait to turbo my d16
Brendon00000 1 year ago
D series all the way!!!!!!!
hudgens8493 1 year ago
wow what a pos....turbo....21psi....cam n rods...300hp......weak lol....my 95 accord coupe h22 turbo 5spd 22psi making over 440whp....now thats an import....not ur little gay ass 1.6l....lmfao pussy
prosurfer2222 1 year ago
@prosurfer2222 dude its a h22 vs. d series turboed and more boost if your not pushing more hp than u needa sell ur car
Mr94stang 1 year ago
@prosurfer2222 Man i dont know you but im damn tired of people talking shit for no good reason. Of course your motor is making more power on the same boost and i bet you dont even know why, ya dumb fuck. i hope your fat ass h22 blows the fuck up. d series all the way bitch
platinumfingers 1 year ago 2
queer bait music
hpiownzilla01 1 year ago
wats the difference between a z6 and a y8 head?? anyone?
HELLOJUANM661 2 years ago
Combustion chamber shape and size.
DemoFly 2 years ago
z6 = vtaaak lol. correct me if i'm wrong but the y8 doesn't have vtec so its just a mini me swap
lascrucez 1 year ago
@lascrucez y8 is vtec
joescivic 1 year ago
@lascrucez i have a 96 ex coupe and im pretty sure its a vtec y8.
cumseeMikeHunt 1 year ago
@HELLOJUANM661 im not too sure but i heard the z6's have a better compression ratio.
cumseeMikeHunt 1 year ago
sleeper!
xxsuicidesmilexx 2 years ago
what type of pistons???? or stock block???
mousy213 2 years ago
NICE, much imspration to me, i have a 00EX and i want to build it so bad.
bushmasterwasr 2 years ago
How do I turn off the bad music?
HiProfile67 2 years ago 9
SLEEEEEEPER!
goon617 2 years ago
D16 FTW!!! Sorry song ruined the vid!
heedless619 2 years ago 11
k pal u got a fast civic props on that now paint it plz!!
icedstar 2 years ago
hp is the only energy the car is producing. here is a metaphor i always try to tell people. Think of TQ as hourly wage. Say, 10$/hr. RPm is how many hours a week you work. To say that 10$/hr is better than 8$/hr only if the rpm's or hours per week are the same. Either way, rpms x tq = power. Or in money, $/hr x hrs per week = income. There is no such think as tq works off the line, and hp is top speed thing... thats retards. Energy in = energy out. To make something faster, INCREASE HP!
logic2reason 2 years ago
you dont need to increase the hp to make it go faster you can also make the car lighter in wight.
dutchyf 2 years ago 2
well thats true. but i was referring to the mass is constant. so of course moving less mass means more acceleration. Force = mass x accelerate. so your statement is true, but i was referring to someone argueing that 250hp@250tq is better than 250hp@225tq... both do the same work at that specific rpm.. both can do 250hp worth of work. but moving less mass means more energy goes towards acceleration..
logic2reason 2 years ago
but to be technical, reducing wt wont make the car faster, in terms of top speed. it will make a car quicker, not faster
:)
logic2reason 2 years ago
i fully understand why the weight helps "quickness" (i have a 2000lb hatch lol) but why not top speed?
alldatjuice321 2 years ago
its because top speed is either limited by air resistance or gearing. and in those cases, wt is not a factor. removing wt will not reduce the air resistance...
logic2reason 2 years ago
is it just because of gearing?
alldatjuice321 2 years ago
hp is the ability to use and understand gearing. but more hp always means more wheel tq.... increasing crank tq withOUT increasing hp will do absolutely nothing.
logic2reason 2 years ago
100tq@8000rpms is the same as 800tq@1000rpms. Becuase of gearing. if 1st gear for both cars was needed to reach 1000rpms. The 800tq car would use 1:1 gearing, netting 800tq. The 100tq car, would use 8:1 gearing. Thus reducing the rpms by 8 = 1000. this would increase the tq output by 8 = 800. hence why they both produce the same power. HP is tq @ rotation speed/ velocity. hp determines how fast something can be. increasing crank tq without increasing hp is 100% pointless. Hp always wins.
logic2reason 2 years ago
Shitty Music...
5Zylinder 2 years ago
agreed
logic2reason 2 years ago
Think of torque as the physical manifestation of power, while horsepower is leaning towards the velocity side of things. It's easier to produce a heavier physical power output with a heavier rotating mass than a lighter ones. Thats why honda's dont exactly rumble the ground at idle.
defprun 2 years ago
What?
TamiyaDude 2 years ago
I was drunk.
defprun 2 years ago
best. posts. ever.
rovrrs 2 years ago
acually, even if your were drunk, thats a good way of putting it....
ghostcivic99 2 years ago
Wrong.
Torque is what gets you there, horsepower keeps you there / sort of. With a smaller displacement motor as a 16V (this one) measuring almost 200ci > 21psi or not (you can imput any variable here, the reality is still the same) that you are going to want horsepower and torque as even and as close as possible. If they were the same thing, they wouldn't be measuring them independantly of each other.
Vaders50 2 years ago
im going ot have to agree with vaders50 in this one theres a old saying torque is what wins races horsepower wins girls phone numbers i drive 18 wheelers for years and when the engine have 500 hp and 800lbsTQ because WHY because he neends more TQ to GET IT UP TO SPEED for the HORSEPOWER to keep it there thats why any dyno readying you look at the TQ always starts off higher then HP passes it
Next time you want to comment hellcat320 learn your fucking shit you moron
cocds 2 years ago
that's because its a turbo diesel engine. Honda engines the tq is always lower than the hp unless you upgrade the engine
scottsrh 2 years ago
there is a reason why u drive truck. TAke it from an engineer. The energy in (500hp) is what is moving your semi. ur tires do not see crank tq. Because gearing changes it. How fast you can accelerate a mass is based on energy i.e. hp.The amount of tq/hp ratio is only based on rpm range. 500hp does the same amount of work as any other 500hp regardless of crank tq. IF 500hp can do more work than another 500hp, then ur creating energy and thus breaking every law of physics. Stay with driving trucks
logic2reason 2 years ago
the reason why tq starts higher is becuase power is based on 2 factors. RPM and TQ. 1000lbs of tq@1 rpm wont much work. 1000lbs@10,000rpms will do 10,000 times more work. the only reason why they cross at 5250rpm is because the amount of energy in 1 hp was determined to be a certain amount. You can create your own unit of power. Say kitten power. and instead of using 5250, say its tqxrpm/525 instead. as long as you label the unit right, then its correct.
logic2reason 2 years ago
having 2 times the rpms, means you can use 2 times smaller gears to increase the tq output by 2. Thus it has 2 times the power. to make 1000lbs of tq at the wheel at 100mph requires 2 times more power than 1000lbs of tq@ the wheel at 50mph.
hp is tq@ velocity. IT would be much easier to think of it like this. 400hp produces 400hp worth of tq. Since knowing the amount of hp and rpm, you can thus go backwards and figure out the tq output. more hp always creates more tq at all rpm outputs..
logic2reason 2 years ago
ha gol dam albert fuckin einstein
badams0454 2 years ago
ha i hate math
badams0454 2 years ago
seriously dude, no one reads all that stuff. speed is what the goal is.
pballer2005 3 years ago
the term "whp" is 100% pointless to even aim for. Since power is two variables, aiming for high tq will lead you down the road of a turbo diesel. If you aim the other way, and get a weedwacker. Both have great characterists of 1/2 of the equation. getting the tq of a turbo desiel and the rpm range of a weed wacker... would net power 6-7 times the power of a f1 car.... so its a balance between the two... Both are related by a set of mathematical calculations... just plz use whp, not wtq
logic2reason 3 years ago
for everyone that reads this.. please understand the term "whp" is referring to the idea of, ex... if the car made 200lbs of crank tq. But since it has a power loss of 13%, it would make "174lbs of tq" at the crank. but since this term incorporates drive loss, its stated at "wheel tq" because its after the transmition/power loss. Unfortunetly that not what the car has at the wheel. For simply changing gears greatly changes the tq output at the wheel. Hense why 1st gear is faster than 5th.
logic2reason 3 years ago
it put down 234 tq fucktard
allenman1234 3 years ago
that block sleeved?
lilgawayne92 3 years ago
a whopping 164 ft lbs of paper bag ripping torque
gforcet5 3 years ago
on a car that weighs less than 3k lbs, you'd be suprised
pballer2005 3 years ago
the car doesnt have 164 lbs of tq at the wheel... if it did. with a car that weights 3000lbs, means 164/3000= .054666... That means that if it actually had, 164lbs of tq at the wheel and the car weighed 3000lbs.. THE MOST it could accelerate is 5.46% the speed of gravity. Which is about 1.77 feet per second, per second. Do you mean to tell me that it takes 3 seconds to go 12 feet? obviously something else is going on.. and its a reduction in shaft speed = incrase of wheel tq.
logic2reason 3 years ago
first off. think about this moron. a moving car is kinetic energy. Mass times velocity squared. To make the mass move faster in a given time period POWER must be inputted, via engine. This is coined HP. talking about crank tq is 100% pointless when your talking about how much energy a motor can put into the system (being the moving car, plus heat loss etc.).You just sound really dumb when you obviously have not look into the hp/tq argument outside of reading page36 in hot rod mag. Educate urself
logic2reason 3 years ago
Fuck all that math. Buy a V8
gforcet5 3 years ago
are you going to actually learn something or speak like your a tv commercial on repeat, your whole life? V8 has tq, = to displacement/ air mass per stroke. that IS NOT POWER!. it is air mass/time. Hense 1L@2rpms is the same air volume as 2L@1rpm. Based on the same air mixture, roughly, 25% of the fuel will be turned into kinetic energy. having MORe tq from a v8/larger displacement motor, JUSt adds TQ. and thus, if it could rev as high as the I$ as mentioned, then yes. The v8 Would own
logic2reason 3 years ago
could've just said theres no replacement for displacement, don't get too technical about it
gforcet5 3 years ago
obviously you dont understand. Adding displacement add tq... which some could look at it as a potential ability to make a lot of power, ONLY if it revved high. there is a replacement for displacement... its called rpm! Since power is TWO variables, then adding "tq" is only 1/2 of the equation. One could also say, there is no replacement for RPMS. a car that produces the same amount of tq would make more power by revving higher. so "replacement for displcement" is what ignorant car guys say...
logic2reason 3 years ago
another thing. gearing is such that your tires are spinning at a ratio slower (equal overall gear ratio) than the crank. Such as 16:1 for a 1st geared honda. first gear times final. what that means, is when you reduce the revs by 2x amount. you get 2x's the tq output. hence, 7,500rpmx164lbst=1,230,000units of energy. First overal gear ratio= 16:1 so 7,500/16=468rpms(peak 1st gear tire rpm) so tq output=; 1,230,000/468=2628lbs tq. As you see. referring to 164tq in this case is POINTLESS. USE WHP
logic2reason 3 years ago
in a car with an actual 1:1 gear ratio ( probably equal to a 350mph top speed in 5th gear), would have 164lbs of tq. But their is not 1 gear in a car, that is not reduced rpm by a factor of atleast 2.5 or more. That means, a morern car, has a tire tq output not lower than 2.5 times that tq at the crank. If you can't understand that gear reduction ( gearing) multiplies tq output, then stop trying to make fun of vehicles like a 8yr old child who just learned the first 1,000 digits of numbers.
logic2reason 3 years ago
haha diggin the hubcaps, definately a sleeper
pepehn 3 years ago
i wouldnt mess with that thing :P
mangaliewa 3 years ago
very nice man!! fuken sleeper!
VtecRacer4 3 years ago
The song is Cartel - Lucky St.
thanks a lot
r0iand 3 years ago
hey boss VERY NICE CAR
Anyways whats the name of your song?
RainesPhotography 3 years ago
sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet
jorbeezy 3 years ago