Added: 1 year ago
From: liarsorfools
Views: 12,612
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (141)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You're all fucking morons

  • "Why Newt Gingrich is Unfit to be President"

    Well, several years ago he would have said it was because his wife wasn't young or pretty enough.

  • Palin destroyed her credibility endorsing this big gov corruptocrat

  • @TheFriendlyRoach Actually, he was the last person to cut gov't and balance the budget.

  • @mikelindell2 hahahahaha No, that was more a Bill Clinton and Senate thing...Newt just did his job like the others but he acted like a Clinton minion or sidekick. But yea, you're repeating Newt talking points ...like he and Reagan created 16 million jobs and defeated the USSR lol...

  • this guy just doesnt know how to not sound like a disaster in the making. he wants to spend outlandish amounts of money ie. not frugal, and 'possibly' get the job done. No plan to undo the heinous acts of Corrpution that essentially killed the American Dollar. He has no real answers, and he is not worthy of your vote. Ron Paul and that All!

  • Newt is a pig, Oink Oink!!!

  • watch the real newt gingrich

  • gingrich may not be the best man for pres, but i'd vote for a janitor over obama any day.

  • Because of his insincere & hypocritical change to already troubled Roman Catholic religion, To make a bully pulpit for the ultra-conservative movement. When he divorced twice. And his documentary on Pope John Paul II was an insult. His motives are phoney.

  • Ive read both sides on the warming debate. I can only say that im sure that industrial factors do have an impact. But lets not blame people for it what is the alternative ? what if we would have never had the industrial revolution . we'd stil be riding around on horses. The world God created will withstand all the punishment its taking . More importantly we should be more worried about what the government is doing right now to weaken us.

  • - Ron Paul 2012 -

  • And dumbo Obama and Pelosi wasted millions of dollars to go to the Climate Vacation in Denmark! Guess you all think that is OK.

  • Pelosi is a stank whore....Gingrich is a dirty fat bastard.

  • The commercial felt as if they were going to kiss at the end.

  • I hate all of your people.  Hate.

  • Fuck Newt Gingrich

  • Fuck white people

  • You don't understand how he works.  He believes, correctly, that you have to be part of the discussion, not just stand on the side. The Democrats will run wild unless you make sure Conservatives are engaged in the debate. The man moved mountains as Speaker of the House. Even though the President at the time was a Liberal Democrat. You don't succeed unless you engage.

  • @pookatim Well said!

  • You don't understand how he works. He believes, correctly, that you have to be part of the discussion, not just stand on the side. The Democrats will run wild unless you make sure Conservatives are engaged in the debate.

  • pork belly twins who would stuff their pockets at every chance

  • every candidate i see is either a clone of george bush or obama... is ron paul the only person who grasps the concept of simplicity? we will never be a sovereign nation we dont need to police the world why is this country being led like lemmings to a fucking cliff? the economy is dwindling... civil liberties and freedoms are diminished... the country is becoming more and more divided... the government slowly stepping in and clamping our minds to radical ideals and war.

  • I think all the Republicans are liars. Ron Paul is a raving fucking moron. Rick Perry couldn't put together an intelligent sentence if his life depended on it!. Mitt Romney has done more for the Democrats than any other candidate so why not nominate him?

  • it seems like he has good ideas.

  • 911 DONE BY OLIVER NORTH SHADOW GOVERNMENT AND ISRAEL MOSSAD!!!!!!

  • I can never get past why your mom named you "Newt" I mean "Newt" what the fuck was going on there?

  • @weetoy69 You realize everything you said was absolutely SHIT?

    RP is THE MAN. <Period

  • Ron Paul for President!

  • Mr. Gingrich, on what date have you decided to announce that you endorse Ron Paul as the GOP candidate for president?

  • Newt can't destroy anyone in a serious debate if you used his voting record and brash statments against him.

  • Thanks Newt!!!

    Thanks for being A FUCKING LIAR!!!

    You'd jack your mother for a buck 95, You damned mental case!

  • @AzBirdDog ...Brilliant remarks...NOT!

  • @quovadis4409 Apparently you don't know the Real Newt.

    But hey, The same simple minds voted for obama as well, without even knowing him.

    It's okay, Our planet needs dumbasses like you too!

  • @AzBirdDog Your vocabulary is so elementary that it's truly laughable...I pity people like yourself who do not know how to comment on anything w/o adding swear words and name calling....4th graders have a more extensive vocabulary than you do...

  • @quovadis4409 I take notice of your inability to use any form of punctuation.

    Goes to show that your child-like skills match your child-like thought.

    LOL

    Now I know that you're a true dumbass!

  • @AzBirdDog I figured someone as elementary as you are wouldn't be able to grasp any punctuation...ergo...you don't deserve it...and gee...just look! I can actually write without using any profanity or name-calling...something you should try sometime...just for the heck of it...something new for you...

  • @AzBirdDog You're right. Crazy is as crazy does.

  • Newt is drunk on himself.

  • Ron Paul 2012!!

  • Ron Paul all the way. And talk about a debate against Obama. Paul would stun Obama into silence.

  • I can't believe people are planning of voting for this moron!!

  • Booooooooooooo. Ignorant. Imperialist. He's after the money and to serve the big companies. I don't think he is going to serve the american poeple when he is going to have more power as president.

  • So pathetic that climate change denial is now the litmus test for conservatives. Half the country has convinced themselves (well, with some assistance from a very sophisticated multi-level PR campaign) that pumping trillions of tons of previously fossilized carbon into the atmosphere will have no effect on climate stability. In truth, we're going to burn every ounce of coal and oil we can find no matter what the consequences. But we might as well be honest about it.

  • "Nuc-u-ler" Stupid like Bush.

  • They both look like soulless black eyed demons how the hell did he become the front runner must be what there sellin at Fox after there last lemon Hermy Cain or Rick Perry Mr.NaftSuperHighway how many Americans lose there jobs from that deal Rick. What ever fox is selling I don't want.

  • @natemorte Well, no matter how bad anyone is, there is no greater sin in the minds of some people than being a member of Mormonism. Yes, I can be a serial adulterer, a liar, and as wretched of a person as possible, and to some people, I can just confess and get off those actions, yet being Mormon is supposedly worse, and that's what Romney is part of.

  • Newt Dumbbitch is one of the worst politicians our country has bred and fostered over the years. His total lack of any job experience, outside that of politics, automatically makes him a candidate without merit. He cannot make up his mind about anything and is a conservative version of Barney Frank. In fact, short of the lisp, he is Barney Frank.

  • Give Newt a break! Everyone makes mistakes! Newt is going to be the next president. I think he will come around on this issue. He's willing to listen to conservatives and move our agenda forward! All you Ron Paul supporters need to take a good look at Ron Paul and ask yourself what Ron Paul would do if Iran decided to Nuke Israel. He'd be like... sorry, we can't afford to help Israel, we have our own problems. He is an isolationist and will never be presidential material.

  • @routerjock1 you are so dumb. Iran nuking Israel? Iran doesn't even have nukes present and in the foreseebale future, and even if when they do, you don't think Israel will nuke them back?

  • @routerjock1 Here is what would happen if Iran was stupid enough to attack Isreal. Isreal would destroy Iran since Iran only has one nuclear weapon vs Irsreal's 300 and Iran can not even make enough gasoline for themselves to last three months in a war. Iran would not nuke Isreal since Iran a muslim country and there are too many holy grounds on Isreal for Iran to nuke. The entire muslim brotherhood would go after Iran for destroying thier own muslim holyground.

  • @routerjock1 Get educated son. He's a unilateralist. Isolationism is far different. The fact is the government and the media lie to you every day and despite how blatantly obvious that is you fail to see it. Israel would defeat any Iranian opposition before they could even dare attempt to launch a nuclear attack. They are equipped with more nukes then half of Europe, and trillions of dollars of American aid. They'll be just fine.

  • Newt has all the morals of, say, a alley cat and the personality of a wet squirrel. If this man should be president, then I should be the first female king of France. And, yes, there's always a chance that some jackass will respond to my comment with some idiotic, snarky remark.

  • Newt has already, addressed this issue.. Newt admitted that he was wrong.. He was duped on the whole global warming scam.. I AM A CONSERVATIVE.. I BOUGHT INTO IT AS WELL EARLY ON.. I did some research, found out the IPCC was a political movement and dismissed it.. Newt did the EXACT SAME THING.. So, not only will I be voting for Newt? He has my support 1000%.. He is the next Reagan.. We need this man in the oval office.. PERIOD

  • @SuperGuitarman69 Why not vote for someone who never flip-floped? Why not vote for someone who never apoligized for previous stances on the issues? Why not vote for someone who perdicted the economic collapse? Why not vote for someone with a sensible foriegn policy who says we should only go to war when we have a declaration of war? Why not vote for someone who perdicted 9/11 and knows what caused it? Why not vote for an honest politcian who always voted for the constitution? Why not Ron Paul?

  • @DP3mo24hofosho I love Ron Paul.. But sorry, I even told Rand this myself ( I am an artist and musician from Nashville) in Kentucky at a fund raiser we all played for him.. The reason I wouldn't support his father is because he was wrong on foreign policy.. He is naive when it comes to it.. You will find tho, on some of Ron Paul's positions (military in areas that should come home) Newt agrees.. And they also agree on the Federal Reserve.. Which is why I like Ron Paul anyway.

  • @SuperGuitarman69 I'd trust RP on forein policy than anyone else. He isn't naive about anything. Human nature doesn't change and attempts to preempt it always fail. Everything else we've done is wrong or is falling apart.Histoy is thebest teacher, when it comes to foreign policy. We need to stop "trendsetting" and empire buiding. Ron Paul.

  • @rrhynes We are not empire building.. If that were true? Then why are gas prices still high when we have the Iraqi oil fields at our disposal? Because they still own their own oil.. Secondly, Paul, if he won? Would change his stance on terrorism over night due to the facts and intel that is only presented to the president.. 1st responsibility for the President is protecting the people. It is constitutional and Paul knows this.. So you supporters will be bitching when he changes.

  • @SuperGuitarman69 Yes we are. We're using our influence to change the dynamic in the Middle East for a variety of reasons. As far as taking the oil, we're not going to do that. If we did, the Russians and Chinese would have the go ahead to do the same. Then we would be at war with them. NATO would try to stop us as well. Paul can and would change the "war on terror" . He could bring all the troups home the day after he was sworn in. What are you afraid of? The truth?

  • @SuperGuitarman69 By the way, you don't want the "WAR on TERROR" to continue. These bastards are slowly , but surely, eroding our civil rights in this country by using that as an excuse. If you pull ou tthe troops and they attack us, send a shit load of cruise missles in and fuck em up. We don't need a physical presence there to protect ourselves. Do you think a soldier on the ground will prevent an expatriate from attacking us here? We have to kill the hatred of the US to stop terrorism.

  • @rrhynes The terrorists attack because of religion.. NOT because we are over there, not because we are tolerant of religion, or they view us as an evil empire... That hate us over religion.. Read Surah... And your thought is, set off a nuclear weapon and then we'll get you.. My thought (and an elected Ron Paul) is to stop it before it ever happens.. Mine and the elected Paul's view is the correct one..

  • @SuperGuitarman69 Bullshit. Once we destabilized the Middle East, there was no government to put a stop to the terrorists. Dictators don't like terrorists as they attract offensive behavior from other countries. WE would be better off with dictators in control, like Saddam or Qaddafi , to keep the terrorists beat down.Of course, due to our self-righteous behavior, we get rid of the dictators and then all hell break loose. Meddling in other countries hasn't gotten us shit.

  • @rrhynes Oh my god.. Who do you think was sponsoring terrorists? Do you think in your state if their were a bunch of lunatics talking about dirty bombs, flying planes into buildings etc.... would be tolerated without being ran over in a military and media blitz? You are so incredibly gullible.

  • @SuperGuitarman69 Read a little. 

  • @rrhynes I guarantee I have forgotten more than you have ever known!

  • @SuperGuitarman69 Apparently, you've forgotten too much. That's what happens to progressive thinkers. Are you related to Newt?

  • @rrhynes I am completely confident in what I think and believe.. I have been a leftist before.. Early on, but as it happens my allegiance is to reason.. So no one can convince me of anything.. It just so happens when I think through things, I find myself in line with conservatives more often than not... But there are times when I agree with Libertarians and disagree with conservatives.. One thing that never happens, Is me agreeing with the left.. They are ALWAYS WRONG..

  • @SuperGuitarman69 I'm confident as well and am more or less a libertarian. However, I do not agree on your foreign policy. It just so happens Kucinich was on the floor today trying to convince his liberal buddies to do away with these misapplied sanctions to Iran. Kucinich , as you know, is the liberal version of Ron Paul. War, sanctions and blockades only serve to piss off the people in these countries who then become ripe for indoctrination. We've tried war, now let's try leading by example.

  • @rrhynes You win through peace by strength.. Proven already.. I shudder to think where we would be had not Reagan been our President.. We would be having a completely different conversation right now.. Russia would be at the tip of every ones tongues. Kucinich is in no way shape or form "a good guy".. He has voted on thousands of bills that cripple this country.Siding with unions, the healthcare bill, countless entitlement spending programs that have us dangerously close to losing the $

  • @SuperGuitarman69 We'll never know. It isn't like Russia is gone you know. They're more powerful than ever. Wait till Putin is back in charge of things. It's a game that nobody can win. You can get along or you can fight, but you will have to coexist. As far as Kucinich goes, I wasn't advocating anything else he said. I know he's a liberal. I don't agree with anything else , but his foreign policy.

  • @rrhynes Well you seem to be a Libertarian.. And as it stands, conservatives and Libertarians a lot of times have to take up for each other.. We agree on far more than we disagree on, that is a fact.. If we had a long enough time to chat, I am sure I could convince you I was right on my foreign policy. I had a Libertarian change my mind on the drug war.. So I am rational, as most Libertarians are as well..

  • @SuperGuitarman69 I doubt you could convince me because history has already shown us what does and does not work. I do know that losing American lives and wasting American's money on foreign occupation is a waste that cannot be redeemed. No matter what happens in Iraq, we will never recover what has been thrown in the garbage. The assault on our personal freedoms(Patriot ACt), Fema camps, etc have been bolstered by our continuing support of foreign wars which are sustained by an in ideology .

  • @SuperGuitarman69 that we are in "Danger" from terrorist acts. Pure nonsense. Joseph McCarthy is alive and well in Congress and the American people are too blind to see it. These foreign wars have damaged our reputation worldwide and exacerbate our tenuous financial situation. Our "War" on drugs is another financial boondoggle that will further erode our liberties and institute ridculous polices from the FDA and our classification of drugs. We're in trouble because we love fear and war.

  • @rrhynes What would the world look like if we would have not intervened in WW2? I remember drills of climbing under desks in case of a nuclear blast if Russia bombed us til Reagan got here.. If we did nothing to stop communism in central America, what if Mexico had to of fought communism and lost? How would we have fended off an attack that close? Remember what I said about the Libertarians are right 80% of the time and conservatives 80% and leftist never being right? Well part 1

  • @SuperGuitarman69 We were attacked in WW2 by the Japanese, with whom he had NOT been intervening in their governmental policies. Big dffierence. They provoked us and we responded. I'm fine with that. I question the use of atomic weapons as all that sparked was a nuclear race to the bottom. You don't really believe Russia was going to bomb us do you? Not hardly. Both sides faced eminent destruction by doing so and that was never going to happen. All drama...all for the war-mongers.

  • @SuperGuitarman69 As far as the war in Europe goes, we helped the British, plain and simple. Our government didn't give two shits about the atrocities occurring in Germany. They kept that secret from the public. They also didn't mind interring the Japanese citizens. Our government is a piece of shit , run by liars, crooks and cowards. I have no faith in it. Communism ultimately fails on its own and so will our Republic(now a POS democracy) if we don't reel ourselves in.

  • @rrhynes this is one of the things that Libertarians are incorrect about. In regards to the reason why that the terrorists attack us? It has nothing to do with them disliking that we are over there.. It has to do completely with religion.. This isn't a guess, they have said this.. In numerous videos.. We could stop, leave, come home and tell the world they are wonderful human beings at it wouldn't stop.. It would worsen.. Open your eyes up and listen to THEM

  • @SuperGuitarman69 The stated motives for the 9/11 attacks were our sanctions against IRaq, US military in Saudi ARabia and our support of Israel. Read Bin Laden's "Letter to America". Do I agree with everything he says? No. However, he does have a compelling argument for his distaste for American meddling in foreign affairs. I don't condone the 9/11 attacks, but I understand why they happened. We aren't a righteous country. We're guilty of many things, a lot of them dishonorable.

  • @rrhynes hand knowledge of.. It is that and that only.. No debate necessary, it is all over youtube out of their own mouths.. And I lost someone on 911.. The world trade center was NOT a military target such as Pearl Harbor.. Anyone who says the "understand" why it happened? Is a complete moron if they show ANY compassion and understanding of Bin Ladens struggle.. He is a radical Jihadist.. Which means his reasons are RELIGIOUS.. Surah clearly states that lying is okay to gain sympathy

  • @SuperGuitarman69 Who said I was compassionate about it? I'm trying to understand why and religion is NOT the only reason. AS far as lying goes, your government lies constantly! They lied about how they killed Bin Laden. They're lying about the drone that Iran now has in their possession. It's one big fat lie after another. I do NOT trust our government to do the right thing or anything demonstrating intellectual superiority. They're war mongers. Face it.

  • @rrhynes Woah woah woah... Your government??? Where are you from??? We will NOT continue this until I know what country you are from.. Read your last post..

  • @rrhynes It is your government. It's my government too. I live in California, Bakersfield. I'm a borderline redneck. I won't label myself as to my beliefs, politically speaking, because I want to know the goddamn truth. No political party will give me that. I used the possessive "your" because you defend it in so fervently.

  • @SuperGuitarman69 I wouldn't classify myself in any way. Classifications, of a political nature, are what has brought us to the precipice. Party-line voting has destroyed this country and divided it. If it were up to me, there would be no "parties" and primaries would be open to all voters. We've fucked up and we need to change.

  • @rrhynes It had nothing to do with sanctions in Iraq, nor support of Israel with the exception that they consider us in with the so called "zionists"... Secondly, there is a a documentary out that pretty much ends all debate of why Jihadists are attacking America.. It is a religious reason and a religious reason only.. They believe that it is in their right to end all non Muslim regimes.. They will USE who ever will support them, then turn on them.. Which we have first had Part 1

  • @DP3mo24hofosho And don't get me wrong.. If Ron was the candidate that was the nominee I would support him no doubt about it.. I think we would be a bit unsafe with him in office.. We would be weak. And that isn't a good thing.. Newt and Paul are by FAR the smartest of any candidate including the communist Obama. But Newt is the wisest by far.. He is a non establishment Republican.. Like Paul and Reagan. They are trying to paint him that way, but Washington hates Newt. Thats good

  • @DP3mo24hofosho Oh FYI, because of what I do for a living and my degree is in economics I get the advantage of discussing issues with politicians a lot.. which is a nice perk of the job.. Most of my musician friends do not even know who we are playing for.. They just want to be paid. Whores lol, every last one of them.

  • @SuperGuitarman69 well, I guess we will agree to disagree on foriegn policy. I feel if we keep the same foriegn policy (Newt's is basically the same as Obama's) we will be more unsafe. But at least you respect Ron Paul and would vote for him if he gets the nominee. But I don't think Newt would be able to take away as many votes from Obama's base as Ron Paul could. Ron would have a much better chance at beating Obama then Newt. Sure, Newt would destroy Obama in the debates, but you need more.

  • @DP3mo24hofosho Well, I am not sure.. as I have stated, I really really like Ron Paul, I agree with him 100% on the Fed, I agree with him on the legalization of drugs and ending the drug war.. But, guess who is entertaining the thought of that as well? Newt.. Listen to Newt a bit more intently..

  • @DP3mo24hofosho AGREE with you. Ron Paul is not against a good fight, but believes, as the Constitution, That Congress must Declare War, not jut a President doing what he wants. Also Ron Paul believes big in National Security and Protecting the USA and its citizens. He also believes that we may bring lot of our own trouble upon us by invading other countries , spending fortunes of money and life of both sides, and NO WAR DECLARED. Peace is worth it the try.

  • "Newt the notorious cornered his wife Jackie in her hospital room where she was recovering from uterine cancer surgery & and served her with divorce papers. Shortly after that, Gingrich refused to pay his alimony and child-support payments. The First Baptist Church in his hometown had to take up a collection to support the family Gingrich had deserted. Six months after divorcing Jackie, Gingrich married a younger woman, Marianne, with whom he had been having an affair."

    Newt is a snake.

  • Yes a True family man, or so he would have you believe. How many times has he been married ? How many times has he cheated ? How many dollars has he been paid illegally ? And you want this stereotypical political charlatan to lead the USA ? Anyone who votes for this sorry excuse of a man are not Americans. You are elitists wanting to steal more and more from the middle class and take the USA to yet another war. I bet most of you posting cant remember a time when the US was not at war. 

  • @Rogue351 I think if the Repulicans nominated this idiot, their screwed, for this very reason. I don't like coming to these sites i get so ticked off for this very reason. But if Cain is nominated his charcter will come up and if Rick is nominated, well what can we say, he sounds like a nut. If Newt is nominated, well, his "character" speaks for itself. With Newt as the nominee, the Repulicans have just re-elected President Obama.

  • @bayesace I agree that Newt would be better than Obama, But as far as electability in a general election goes, Newt would not do well. Yes, Newt would destroy Obama in the debates but you need more than that, you need likability and someone that can apeal to those liberals. Newt doesn't. Mitt doesn't. Only Ron Paul and Jon Huntsman do, but the only candidate serious about changing this country and stoping it from going bankrupt is Ron Paul. He offers real cuts, Has Newt offered real cuts? No.

  • The new top tier- The Geico Gecko and Eye-of-Newt. I'm with the Gecko...or that guy with two first names...Ron Paul. If I wanted a Flipper- I'd vote for a dolphin. Newt-you were done before you started you anti constitutionalist war mongering Neocon.

  • So basically what he is saying is that what he said yesterday doesn't mean it is true today? Fuck that guy. He's corrupt, a fear monger and a liar

  • Conservatives have been dead wrong on climate - and science in general for that matter - since scientists began warning us about this issue in the early 90s. Why would ANYONE expect them to get anything right now? Conservatism is just inherently incompatible with science, unfortunately. They are, without exaggeration, the single most dangerous political threat to humankind today.

  • @mwwillis1yt That which passes for science in the halls of the new collegic religion; are as close to facts as Hitler was to being a friendly European head of state. Obviously you have not considered the FACT that there is evidince to the contrary, and these environmental evaluations made by tenured professors, with job security assured from Fedral grants, are in large part incorrect, and lacking in substance, as is your resume when it concerns a job in the private sector. Is the kool aid good?

  • @mwwillis1yt I guess you don't follow the news with all these "liberal scientist" coming forth with their fudged numbers and exaggerated claims? LOL Global Warming is for idiots. Yea, and in the 80's it was Global Chill, hahahaha.

  • Great video!

  • For the one's that don't know how to add,,The carbon level is rising very fast,with the 1 per week coal plants that China is building I sure that Carbon is better for us to breath ,,,???

  • Globalism speech for his future one world oligarchy position not to mention him chairing a Nanotechnology forum that will make transhumanism possible. also stood shoulder to shoulder with Nancy Pelosi to pass the “Criminal Safezones Act” which prevents armed citizens from defending themselves in certain arbitrary locations.

  • Ron Paul is head and shoulders above any of these clowns

  • A few billion to REALLY address the issue, create jobs, etc., versus 700 billion in free stimulus handouts? I'd go with Gingrich's plan any day of the week.

  • Good lord he just makes it worse. The problem with Gingrich is he's too smart for his own good... and ours.

  • Wow, Newt needs to get his head straight. Yeah it's political, and is it their fault it's political? No, it's not. Everything this important is going to be political. Exxon and BP have billions of dollars to spend to discredit actual facts and muddy the water.

    Gingrich, go look at the actual evidence, and once you've done that, be the actual leader the conservatives need and help save our species instead of wasting what little time we have left equivocating.

  • this prick backed scozzofava in NY against Hoffman, a true constitutionalist

    PROSTITICIAN

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more