The enigmatic ICA Stones depicted in beginning of video where possibly made by Antediluvian culture (Manchay Manco of Peru?). The Doctor that found them in a cave in Chivateros area in northern Peru found many THOUSANDS of them. There are still many more there. He died and left his museum in Lima to his family. The University of Penn & Peruvian govt. says they are all fakes. However, they can't explain HOW they are fakes. They depict dinosaurs interacting w/humans - ANOTHER INCONVENIENT TRUTH?
To get more data on the Peruvian ICA stones please read labyrinthina(dot)com/cabrera2.htm & then u be judge that this skepticism is massive cover up of another *inconvenient truth* for mainstream academia. The stones show Tyrannosaurus Rex as feathered and in an upright position in direct opposition to present theory. And how does a primitive hoaxer carve into diamond-like Andesite? And how do hoaxers even know ANYTHING about dinos in the 16th century when these were 1st brought back to Spain?
@Spookysr A guy who carved some of the dinosaurs admitted it years ago! Going along with this makes you look even more stupid... for your own sake, be quiet.
@666popey666 - Yeah only to recant later saying that he was "forced" by Peruvian government to lie and say that. How do you explain the Ica Stones that turned up in Spain in 16th century? What did this guy have a magical time machine?
How did he fake over 100,000 stones in VERY hard Andesite? How did he use *comic books* to get new information depicted in the stones on dinos?
Yes a very inconvenient truth for you too I see...
@Spookysr Dinosaurs are indeed still around as such-we call them birds! Please look up dromaeosaurid theropods, there's a shit load of evidence but still some informed conjecture...oh, & lots of halfwit uneducated creationist types too. The feather symmetry/asymmetry argument supports evolution through NS too
@666popey666 - Yes that is one theory based on hollow-bones which is a bit specious to me. However, there is hard evidence for large prehistoric *aquatic* creatures still existing worldwide.
Forget Creationist nonsense! I'm not advocating that Fundamentalist pablum-thinking (i.e. 6,000 year old Earth?). I'm presenting something else entirely, yet still involves a supernatural metaphysical super-sentient architect model which belies Natural Selection.
I just don't see how. But I wasn't offering the *feathery T-Rex* story for that reason. I mention that the T-Rex models in the Ica Stones *seem* to depict feathers! Now we didn't discover that until American Paleontologists found just that in the Gobi Desert in China RECENTLY. The hoaxer was supposed to have made these highly detailed stones in 60's. I don't understand yr thought process here...
I think some dinosaurs are here. Hell we only explored 5% of the oceans...Each year or so, new species are being discovered. Megalodon was in the dino age.
@juventinorocks - Truth be told the USNAVY has already photo-documented the cryptid prehistoric creature(s) (i.e. Mokele-Mbembe) in the D.R. of Congo in Likoula Swamps during *Operation Guardian Retrieval* in 1997. US Marines on long range patrol into Lake Tele and into the swamps encountered the beasties munching harmlessly on molombo tree fruit. They viewed it as an extreme oddity but where compelled by academia to keep it under wraps.
Use FOIA to make them produce the photos and reports.
To help you look at FOIA: Operation Guardian Retrieval/Congo and Zaire/17 March - 5 June 1997
Evacuation of over 1,000 US & Canadian citizens up and down Congo River during civil unrest in Rwanda. Joint Special Operations Task Force (JSOTF) had been formed, SOCEUR under Gen. Lambert and CTAFF commander Gen. Smith.
A 26th Marine Expeditionary unit in primitive pirogues (canoes) encountered and documented strange long necked animals in the Likoula swamp region. They looked like dinosaurs.
@Spookysr Yes that particular story is knocking about on all sorts of conspiracy theory sites, creationist rubbish sites and what not....
But oddly nobody seems to be able to produce these pictures..odd that...
If truth be told 'real truth' then the truth is there's no evidence of any of this total rubbish! But that won't stop you from 'wanting' it to be true, and confusing desire with reality.
Personally I'd like there to be dragons and aliens and all sorts of things... but there just aren't
@MumblingMickey - "Yes that particular story is knocking about on all sorts of conspiracy theory sites, creationist rubbish sites and what not...."
You can no more show credible evidence of that completely specious assertion than you can show plausible evidence that Evolution/NS is no longer still just a theory. You just like saying things that you wish were true and not just inconvenient truths for you.
Dragons & aliens COULD be misidentified reality to the un-informed viewer.
@juventinorocks There are a lot of dinosaurs still here ...except when humans arrived and invented language we started to classify the animals... and were classified dinosaurs as birds since we didn't know about dinosaurs!
Birds don't have teeth... but do have the DNA to make teeth... they don't have many scales left... but dinosaurs had feathers and birds have the coding DNA for scales.
Plenty of dinosaurs... billions of them... I have one sitting on a perch in front of me right now...
@PokeTrainerDragonBoy Dinosaurs I'm sure look reptilian... but then again marsupials look like all other mammals until you take a look at a duck billed platypus...
The fact is that all current reptiles AND all birds are descended from animals that came before the dinosaurs... So Dinosaurs, crocodiles and birds all share this one common ancestor.
@TheSelfIndulgence Birds descend from dinosaurs. They come from them, like a child to parent. They are technically dinosaurs (the smaller ones that didn't die out in the mass extinction then evolved to have feathers and look birdlike). Crocs and the rest of the reps are just living COUSINS of the dinos.
@UpwardsFallings - You are being too absolute with this bird theory. The inventor of this theory does not even contend that it is "gospel truth". Its just a theory based on hollow-bones. To me that is SCANT evidence of genetic relationship. However, I'm not debunking bird/dino theory... I just say the jury is still out.
[btw in 24 years of reading scientific papers and journals, not once have I seen anyone state their idea was 'gospel truth'... which would be very odd anyway since the gospels don't agree with one another.]
Clearly you seem to know a lot about this...and since you read about it, I'm sure you'll tell us all where you find discrepancies... yes?
Ohh for fucks sake look at your channel... UFO's religious nuttery, dinosaurs and whatnot... either you are ten years old with an active imagination, or you are psychotic...
Hey did you know Obama secretly keeps dinosaurs in the white house rose garden... they have a top secret invisible force field to hide them...and Jesus and the aliens landed in a UFO and gave them to him....
@Spookysr When you find a dinosaur that has scales, teeth a tale, lays eggs and has all the features of a bird, and a dinosaur... then that's what it is...an avian dinosaur.
Anyway, who cares, what you don't know is that hot on the heels of the 'amazing red blood cell proof fossils aren't old' which is the nonsense you are fed, is the real science... the science that reconstructs dinosaur DNA from the 'fossilized' protein fragments.
Now when there is a DNA comparison, what will you say then?
@MumblingMickey - Listen Einstein...take all what you said and then apply it to the Platypus. Is it a bird? We recently now have T-Rex DNA from Montana USA. When the lady paleontologist that found it releases it we can then see if birds are related to at least T-Rexs. I will give in if that proves out.
It is of course if you haven't read anything about it...
I'd say a feathered dinosaur that flies is more or less conclusive proof that there were feathered dinosaurs that flew.... the proof being in the finding of feathered dinosaurs that flew... see how finding the thing that proves the thing...sort of proves the thing...
@MumblingMickey - Why does a feathered dino have to fly? DO Ostriches, Emus, and Penguins fly?
I said that jury is still out on whether the "dinos are birds" theory is no longer a theory and now is fact. Try to stop twisting my words. Makes you look disingenuous.
Maybe the author's conjectures & assertions are unscientific and based on misunderstandings of reality - I'll agree. However, he is pointing out things that are being SEEN around the world and demand a BETTER explanation than specious theories from agenda-driven cabal-oriented evolutionists and atheists who have a "dog in this fight". Namely their much vaunted theories.
@UpwardsFallings actually they had feathers long before they could fly... its not like evolution has a mind.. .birds fly because they also have feathers , which help them to fly... they didn't evolve the feathers in order to fly.... before they could fly the feathers had other uses.
But dinosaurs had feathers too... one of the issues in the Jurassic park movies was that they didn't to paint the velociraptors and the baby t-rex with feathers.
Just because we have dinosaur fossil doesn't mean they're extinct. We had fossils of the coelacanth, and thought they were extinct. But it turned out they you can find them, if you know where to look. Some of the great lakes of so large and deep, that there are parts of them that no ship has ever been to. Who knows what lives there.
@Nomoreidsleft - "Well, there's no use debating it. Someone just has to find one."
Ummmm... well isn't that what a Coelacanth is? So basically BTDT right? I mean In 2002, the South African Coelacanth Conservation and Genome Resource Program was launched to help further the studies and conservation of this prehistoric animal.
With right resources from our US NAVY we might catch other cryptozoologicals too. But I won't hold my breath as there is too much "opposition" to actually do anything.
"Opposition" comes from the powerful mainstream academia who don't want these prehistoric creatures found and captured as they introduce an EXTREME "inconvenient truth" to an already specious and highly agenda-driven theory of our true origins. I think "they" wished they'd all just evaporate away and we go on watching Television for our brainwashing "education" (i.e. "Millions and millions of years..." - Dr. Carl Sagan).
@Nomoreidsleft "Well, there's no use debating it. Someone just has to find one."
That's the point, there really is no evidence until there is evidence.
However generally speaking that is not what Spookysr thinks. He only needs nobody showing there AREN'T dinosaurs to accept there are.
And even then...with the entire world photographed... every meter of it... he still insists they might be 'somewhere' ... perhaps hiding out up the odd cherry tree.. ninja dinosaurs...
@Nomoreidsleft Coelacanth are not a species of fish, they are an entire order of fish.
None of the fossilized Coelacanth are the same as the species of Coelacanth in the seas right now.
Also sauropods did not live their entire lives in water, didn't live in forests (they couldn't cos given the size of a herd after a little time there wouldn't be a forest), plus they simply couldn't survive without the atmosphere they lived in.
That does not mean new species are not discovered every day.
@MumblingMickey - But the Coelacanth is still an inconvenient truth for people like you.
The cabal that is saying that Loch Ness and Congo creatures are sauropods are all wet! (Pun intended). My theory they are elasmosaurs or pliesosaurs which are aquatic prehistoric creatures.
in Palawan there is a tyrannosaur... but the smaller version.. it was raised by the natives and believe to be the holy animal... it's forbidden to go there
@Robotcobray - Yeah I heard that too. But it was Isla Sorna - Site C. It's a research station of InGen Inc. Somehow Dr. John Hammond convinced Dr. Mary Higby Schweitzer of NCSU to give up some of her soft tissue from the marrow cavity of a fossilized tyrannosaur leg bone (specimen 1125/MOR 1125) found at Hell Creek Formation at Jordan Montana USA.
Dr. H wasn't sure Site C's stable so they're sending in US Navy ST-6 team w/Dr. Ian Malcolm to investigate.
@Robotcobray - Here's an actual photo of the baby Tyrannosaur at Site C. US News Reporters were invited to the island to get press photos before Dr. Hammond releases this new chimera to the world. Notice how tame he is (or was*).
tinyurl(dot)com/7uws5ek
*This is what happens when you piss one of them off:
In my opinion middle white america have lost the plot. I believe this page is absolute evidence of its existance. Canada and S Africa step away from the edge. Austrailian guy - the shining light in a pointless debate. USA, junk food comes in many forms.
Of course they're real. Yeti, Sasquatch, Quetzalcoatl, Loch Ness Monster, chupacabras, dinosaurs - they all hang out together and watch each others' backs. That's why we haven't been able to find any of them.
I believe some dinosaurs are still alive. I think it's so cool. And I believe that scientists are so ignorant to the truth that they refuse to even look at the evidence
There have not been any dino blood cells that weren't fossilized. That's a lie creationists have been floating around out there. Show me or shut up on this one because I know it's a blatant lie.
That's a picture of drift wood not Champ. Look at the original picture and not the cropped one. You can tell that the object isn't that big.
@xdassinx As a christian...and until very, very recently a biblical literalist... I do have to both agree and disagree here...
Firstly... yes I DID go an read up on what these 'red blood cells' actually were...I'm not very scientifically minded but I do understand they are neither cells nor blood....
My disagreement comes with your approach... cynicism and looking down your nose is not the best approach... its the one that stopped me from taking science seriously all my life.
@LoveJCForLife Well, the cynicism and looking down my nose was directed at the person posting this video. I gave trying to be nice a good long try there. And got treated like the village idiot by people I'm frankly amazed can function in the world let alone tie their own shows.
If you have the faith to keep Christ while not ignoring science. You probably have a better understanding of what FAITH is then the fundamentalists. Good luck to you.
@xdassinx "If you have the faith to keep Christ while not ignoring science. You probably have a better understanding of what FAITH is then the fundamentalists"
Well, I found at almost every turn that what I am told of science by almost everyone of faith is simply not accurate.
That has no impact on my faith, but it does lead me wondering where people are getting their information from.
In the long run I think accepting silly notions that later turn out to be false will destroy peoples faith.
Fundamentalists, and so called Evangelical Conservatives (I'm beginning to just use the word Zealot any more) have an on going disinformation campaign going on.
It's sometimes difficult to find a a legitimate source to fact check or research something to do with evolution with the clutter of numerous creationist web sites all saying the same thing.
It can be frustrating. And like you said, counter productive.
@SHARKREEF2011 You're a dumb ass. You know how I know you're a dumb ass. Because I'm going to have to help you make your failed argument, because you even failed at making it... Because you're a dumb ass.
It isn't Behys black box fukwit. It is Darwin's Black Box by Michael Behe. Never a top scientist.
So Behe is your best bet. This the horse your backing Johnny? Behe and his irreducible complexity idea have been thoroughly refuted.
More important than that if you truly value your faith... if you really do believe Jesus Christ, If you really really want to follow the teachings of what I consider to be the greatest person that ever lived. Then you will do yourself a very big favor and reconcile both the findings of science and the teaching of Christ.
If you don't you will be a very sorry individual for it! But angrily jumping up and down insisting science is wrong just isn't going to help you do that.
@xdassinx Well personally it is counterproductive to the point where neither of my parents will even discuss my brothers, its as if they don't exist. Which is very hard coming up to the holidays. Both are now atheists (having been raised as strong Christians)
Only 3 or 4 months ago I got into a debate with my brother who simply asked me questions, I simply had no answers for... it was the silly answers online that told me somebody was clearly in breech of Ex 20:16... and it wasn't my brother.
CONT. And I know four things in life when it comes to faith.
1. My brother would never willingly lie to me
2. Neither would my parents.
3. I am being lied to....
4. The numbers are not adding up
I even caught one christian out bold face lying to me .... with crap I knew she knew was totally fabricated.
Then I realised I too had done the same to her.... she must have known....she's not stupid.... there's no way she believed anything I was saying... I didn't.
@xdassinx I also know what you are referring to with this 'disinformation' campaign... I know that because I and almost everyone I know are part of it... mostly unwittingly...
But I know now that scientists are not out to 'get me'...which was a pretty stupid idea from the get go! Or that they are all deluded, which is equally stupid.
But I do not blame evangelical Christians for that...
I blame the people who really don't care what I think about science.
@LoveJCForLife Well, I don't know why you'd blame scientists. Zelots, or if you want to call them evangelical Christians are spending millions of dollars to spread falsehoods. While science is working to gain a greater understanding of the nature of the world. Theories that lead to practice technologies, medicine and treatments and the like.
There are scientists on youtube making videos debunking the pseudoscience of creationism because they do care.
@xdassinx I blame scientist because they claim to be the voice of reason, education, and discovery and in my entire life I have never seen one scientist (except on TV) yet there are reportedly millions of them.
If they really believe in these things (do not say they don't need belief) then why are they not promoting them to the population. Why does someone think cats are supposed to have evolved from dogs? why does someone think birds are mammals?
CONT. Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying science people are bad at science. I'm saying they don't care about the rest of us.
It seems to me that every piece of information you might want to read costs lots of money (I thought my kids schoolbooks were expensive) and if you do get the information it all assumes you are some sort of brainiac scientist.
well I'm not but I might at some point like to know how an LCD tv works or how to build a website without a ton of gibberish I don't understand.
@LoveJCForLife Since your comment is at the top, and it relates to me personally let me address that.
Yes a lot of science is for the most part 'gibberish' to the public. However in my field I have no choice but to explain things using math or very precise and complex language. that's the way it is.
But I will agree that scientists have dropped the ball explaining findings in a language the general public can easily understand.
The public does deserve better. But thats also not our job!
@MumblingMickey - Oh give me a break. If you are a lettered scientist you are just another bandwagon-wananbe-to-mainstream-academia parroting the latest dogma you really don't quite fully understand nor could you formulate an hypotheses based on your own work NOT related to what your professor(s) indoctrinated you in class. You would not listen to specious Cryptogzoology theories fearing ostracism or marginalization from your precious academia over-lords.
@MumblingMickey - "...ahh the old 'all the scientists are a conspiracy out to get me' nonsense... that didn't take long to surface. Bit like the elephant in the vid really..."
No... not all.. just you and your ilk.
Elephant? What time stamp is that in video. I don't remember seeing that. I'll look again and comment on it.
@MumblingMickey - Are you saying 0:40 was an elephant? Now I'm LMAO at you. This was the Sandra Mansi (of New Haven CT USA) photo. I interviewed her at Burlington VT and studied satellite imagery to discover the actual location of the photo. We did backgrounding on her and her story. Even the US Federal Govt and Military got into the fray (out of idle curiosity). Her story is bona fide. It was not an elephant! IMHO It was a here-to-fore unidentified long-necked deep lake creature in Vermont USA.
Anonymous scientists at Univ of VT Burlington helped a local reoccurring eye-witness identify them as possibly being from family: Tanystrophidae. I prefer to think they are Plesiosauroidea. However, the 2005 Affolter and Bodette video was just stunning. The media (not the content) was termed bona-fide not faked by the US FBI. I'm trying to get a copy of the video right now. It was on ABC News-com for a while but thanks to mainstream-academia its been summarily pulled from Internet (for now).
@Spookysr sheesh...... yeah obviously you think its a dinosaur... its an elephant.... you can see its an elephant... in fact an african elephant... 'Loxodonta'
Now if I can even tell what species of elephant it is whats wrong with you?
Also I'm sure without any satellite images... in fact even in the 1800's you'd be able to reason yourself that if herds of dinosaurs 50 feet long were hiding out in a forest...then pretty soon there would be no forest!
If we were having this conversation 300 years ago then yes, I could probably give imparting what I know to you a good try in simple language.
But, in 2011 information has grown so massively that I just don't have all the answers. Its contained in a body of knowledge that exceeds anyones ability to explain it to you in full. If you don't know what you are looking for you can't find it!
BTW you now met a scientist. Congratulations, for what its worth.
6-Leprechauns have a basis for a misidentified scenario. Diminutive people leave in tribes in Africa (Kalahari Bushmen). If a Caucasian-version practiced the Occult (magic) in New Hibernia (ancient Ireland) then an observer could be forgiven for exaggerating and embellishing a real experience with a heretofore unidentified tribal group.
1. Population of 1911? Don't remember doing that - explain please.
2. Obviously I meant to say Bonobos W-H-E-R-E unknown in the Congo Basin until they were eventually discovered - duh!
3. This is moronic as NOAA STILL wants to continue ocean mapping despite Pentagon dissent. Try checking the areas I quoted this time. Also satellite imagery is NOT mapping if you have no boots on ground to verify land targets/roads/etc.
4. We were talking about BREATHING giants? Not genera.
@Spookysr Also Since I know how radiometrics works and you don't then I can tell you with 100% confidence and 100% accuracy that radiometric dating cannot simply not work past 5k years... if it works for 100 years it works for 100 million years, Ironically a lot of radiometrics won't work UNDER 5k years!
Its not something that is physically capable of not working...
I'm sure you were informed somewhere that is the case...but its like saying a ball can roll one foot but not 3 feet.
D be the quantity of atoms of the daughter isotope,
D0 is your starting point for the daughter isotope.
N is the quantity of parent isotope atoms.
λ is your decay constant, you can put any element in here that has a half life longer than say 100 years.
Now I expect you to know sweet fuck all about decay rates and radioactivity...... but it will at least explain to you how you know nothing but think you do!
@MumblingMickey - Your show-off algorithm was really unnecessary. The salient point is that dendrochronology is 100% more accurate than these methods as external radiation contamination can skew the results to the exposed-to-elements sample. Dendrochronology has demonstrated that these methods are faulty on a order of magnitude after 50,000 years. What you fail to see is that the original sample's quantity can be upwardly skewed mathematically throwing off your final results.
@MumblingMickey - After picking yourself up and wiping up those tears maybe you should check your facts:
D = D0 + N(t) (eλt − 1)
I'm no subject matter expert, but are you absolutely sure this algorithm you quickly copied down from your reference material is correct? I'm just saying it looks slightly wrong to me. But your the expert so I won't LMAO at you...
I wanna' call you TWISTER. B/c you really know how to twist ppl's words around to fit your agenda. You'd make a good Psyops Ranger here.
@Spookysr Yes I'm positive... its accurate. you can say what you like. but you saying isotopes don't decay beyond 50k y a and me seeing they do, and can be measured to do so.. well you may as well be telling me all ducks have one leg.
Nonsense is one thing... but to be telling people things you don't understand are not possible... when they do? Well frankly that's an exercise in stupidity I'm not getting involved in..
Just go look it up. If you don't understand thats not my problem.
@MumblingMickey - You do a wonderful job of misquoting me or are you just functionally illiterate? I meant that radiometrics is not reliable for dating anything because you do not know how much the sample had when it died. Therefore there is no point of reference to say how many is left today when you date it. I did not say that the formula or process you use is flawed. It seems you have
@MumblingMickey - Let me correct myself: Radioisotope Dating is empirically WRONG on an order of magnitude past 50ky (not 5ky as I incorrectly said) as scientist discovered by comparing to Dendrochronology. Therefore, MILLIONS & MILLIONS of years is simply a bloated miscalculation for the origins of life. However, I am NOT saying Fundamentalist 6-solar days nor 6,000 year old Earth makes any sense either. IMO the problem is external radiation contamination of test samples.
@xdassinx "It's sometimes difficult to find a a legitimate source to fact check or research something to do with evolution "
Well I don't know how you use a search engine but if i type in something like 'what is evolution' I get wikipedia at the top of the list I got no science websites.
Now christian or not thats what someone will type, yes? no? Remember a year ago I was under the impression a scientific theory was a best guess under the circumstances.
@xdassinx- "There have not been any dino blood cells that weren't fossilized."
Dr. Mary Higby Schweitzer of NCSU found soft tissue from the marrow cavity of a fossilized tyrannosaur leg bone (specimen 1125/MOR 1125) found at Hell Creek Formation at Jordan Montana USA.
Jeez - you should check your facts before being so dogmatic and absolute. (Sound: pulling your foot out of your mouth?)
ABC News has film footage of Champ in 2005. It appears to be an sub-aquatic prehistoric creature.
Idk y I heard this but I have heard that scientists r bringing dinosaurs back from frog DNA and the Mosquitos that were caught in tree sap…I mean why play God? And crate shit that was meant to be dead ???
absolute nonsense... It's no coincidence that all the morons of this world sit on one side insisting on this nonsense and everyone else laughs their head off at them.
Cont. also from a recent PM don't get me wrong. I am in fact a very religious person, and I certainly count myself (inasmuch as anyone can claim to be) a good christian.
But that position no longer requires me to ignore the obvious to protect God. God is well able to defend himself....better than I ever could. Why would anyone believe this nonsense? I still don't know why I did!
Especially since all the information you need to make a call on it is available at your fingertips these days!
I'm not Christian, and I don't believe this, but dinosaurs living among humans is probably the only thing I wish that Young Earth Creationists were right about.
While I can't say I think all of this video's content is authentic, the allusion to tyrannosaurus rex blood cells at 0:38 is quite correct. See 'Scientists recover T. rex soft tissue' in the science section on msnbc.com, or just conduct a Google search. The photographs are genuine. And there have been rumours of extant dinosaurs circulating around central Africa. Ever heard of Mokele-mbembe, or Ngoubou? I am not saying any of this is true, but it is open to speculation and debate.
@xTheNomadx I understand, my friend. However, people finding a video named like this are most probably expecting more solid material than the pictures in this video. I understand now that this was edited and posted to make people speculate, but if this is the case I would suggest that you change the title to "Dinosaurs, do they still exist?". I don't want to come across rude at all, but I am a biologist and all these videos claiming to prove anything sort of sickens me. They never do...
@xTheNomadx As I mentioned to another poster, I thought these things were debatable too. Then someone asked me to substantiate these ideas.
So to prove them wrong I done just that and went off an read up what they were etc.
Unfortunately for me I ended up realizing just the opposite. The things you mentioned are on fact all documented... even the Mokele-mbembe came originally from a childrens book and is not debatable since the source is known.
@xTheNomadx Also one thing I have discovered during my goal of separating the chaff from the wheat in these things is as follows. The media don't do science very well, they just tell you things that you can research.
But then when you actually look at the actual story...its nowhere near what MSNBC said it was.
In my case I read Mary Schweitzer's research (the woman who discovered it). Its not what you think, or what MSNBC told you, and certainly not what I was told on either AIG or Watchtower.
Atheist evolutionist can be shown the evidence in their face, and they still manage to talk shit that's not even revelant to the argument. It's not in the matter of evidence for them, but the matter of popularity belief; therefore it only "discredit" the video.
@digga115 If the Bible said that the earth was millions of years old you would believe it, and that Sir is the reason your opinion about anything is irrelevant you are a sheep echoing the dribble of a outdated poorly written piece of literature that has already been proved wrong in every way and then you have the cheek to say other people are ignoring evidence? What a load of offal lol
@GIVEmeSOMEsugarBA8Y Hipacritical comment, I'll say. If you've lived back in the 1500's, scientists said the earth was flat, you would have believed them more than likely. Bible however did say the earth was round. Back then, scientists used to estimate that there were only 3,000 stars while the bible said there's more stars than there's grains of sands of the earth. Going with your argument, you would have believed that there were only 3,000 stars back then. So please, shut your biasm ass up.
@digga115 But that is my point when i am wrong i can adjust when the bible is wrong you will stick your finger in your ears.
Why has it got to be all or nothing with you Christians, with you its ether everything in the bible is right or you are a Atheist Marxist Jew or what ever hate spills out of Glenn Beck's mouth these days. evolution has not been a controversial subject for the better part of a century you are basically trying to convince people that 2+2=10 and they are not swallowing.
@GIVEmeSOMEsugarBA8Y I can watch the video again, and then I read your comment, then you say I'm trying to convince people that 2 + 2= 4? Honestly, why the fuck am I even arguing with you? The video just showed you straight up evidence, then you somehow call me delusional? :-/ This is exactly why I stopped arguing with atheists a long time ago. :-)
@GIVEmeSOMEsugarBA8Y Fuck this crap, why can't we all just get along instead of mocking and arguing about our beliefs of the orgins of the world? We should all respect and observe each others' beliefs with an unbiased conclusions instead of trying to cut our heads off of what we believe.
Because some of us might actually have spent many years in university at our own expense to get qualifications that allow us to work in a field that will benefit the rest of humanity using real science and observing the real world. ..
Meanwhile fuckwits that haven't done a useful thing in their miserable lives produce bullshit like this which holds back the general publics perception of science, lowers funding and damages progress!
@LoveJCForLife Okay, now you're just being a total dick about it. First off, there's fossils of shoe imprints found in trilobites fossils. Radioactive dating had been tested on Hawaii's dried lava (rocks) that were actually 20 years old. Dated, and it came out to be 23,000 years old. A living snail was dated to be hundred thousand years old. It's just some things that damages your beliefs, and you tend to say it's killing the work of general knowledge of science.
@GIVEmeSOMEsugarBA8Y (continuation) And I know this video hurt your feelings because they showed ancient drawings of dinosaurs. So in an unbiased conclusions, it's basically saying that dinosaurs were more than likely living less than millions of years ago. I tried to be friendly with you about it, but I just have to be a dick to you. The only fuckwit around here is you, fuck boy.
@digga115 LMAO why the hell would it hurt my feelings? if dinosaurs lived less than a million years ago it wouldn't bother me let alone "hurt me" born again Christians are truly a bizarre breed but are funny in a novelty kind of way, now off to bed early tonight you got rubbish to learn in church in the morning maybe you will get a visit from Ray Comfort and please remember not to read anything but the Bible and ignore everyone who does not OK sweetie?
Mayne they just steped away and are not the main species (they don't rule it we do) and i think the sam is going to happen with humans. Were going to be around here for milions of years but won't be the most powerful species something else will.
Dr. Dennis Swift what the fuck are you talking about you point at a fucking table with random shit on it, than a old guy says he saw a pterosaurs. This video is so retarded and trust me i have a open mind i do believe other life is out in the universe but seriously the dinosaurs these psychopaths are reporting are gone and extinct, with 6 billion humans on earth it wouldn't be unreasonable to think if a fuckin t rex was here we would know by know....... jesus christ fucking retards
@ScruFFsaNdmagGs - He's pointing at ICA STONES from Lima Peru. There is NO WAY that these petroglyph stones are a clever hoax as they were found in a deep cave where the finder said there were over 100,000 of them of various sizes to hand sized to statue size. And it was in a year where dinosaurs were a new word to most people especially in a 3rd world country like Peru. Also scientists say that the stones could not be etched that easily & is mystery wat used. Depict dinos interacting w/humans.
Videos like this one and some of the credulous responses underneath are sad examples of the low level of the critical thinking skills exhibited by people in this country. The educational system must not be doing its job nor are parents if young people can grow up thinking utter nonsense like this might be true. Shame.
the guy at the beginning of this video must have issues lol 6 billion humans roam earth if there was a mafuckin t rex i think we would know LOLL soo gay
100 years ago, when 100 million people roamed the Earth they used the same silly argument against the existence of Gorillas. This is until they explored the world more and found them, same argument was used against Giant Squid until 50 years ago when it was discovered as well.
Over 80% of the land mass of this planet is wilderness, over 50% of the Earth's land mass has yet to be deeply explored. There is plenty of things to find, if we only but look.
@ScruFFsaNdmagGs - There may be no T-Rex's roaming about but how about several Elasmosaurs (or arguably Diplodicus) cavorting in Dja River in Cameroon (Africa) and Democratic Republic of Congo (Africa) in Likoula Swamp and Lake Tele? Its now getting very good coverage and is not just some wishful thinking like other living-dino reports. The creatures have overwhelming and compelling eye-witness and photo evidence. Even our US Military had an encounter in 1997. Google Mokele-Mbembe.
@Spookysr Yeah just looked at that on google earth...sorry no huge 3 storey monsters traveling in herds through the swampy marsh.
Sorry about that, but third hand stories related by african tribes people inclined to tell you anything for a bottle of whiskey and a dollar in change is not exactly what you might call valid, repeatable and demonstrable evidence.
Amazed you accept this shit with fuck all evidence but when it comes to real evidence you duck for cover like a 1950's cartoon turtle.
@MumblingMickey Also there is no photo evidence... the ONLY image ever supposedly taken was by a guy and his wife who claimed they took a shaky image but it was destroyed and they were with a bunch or 28 other people who seen nothing
The funny thing is if you took a picture of a penguin and showed it to any congalese bushman he would happily tell you there are loads of them living in the river, and for a dollar he'll take you there.
Then again creationists would happilly swallow a house.
@MumblingMickey - Spoken by a man who knows too little (LOL). I see you have done absolutely no research into the back-story of Moleke-nmembe. The Bantu are hardly "whiskey" drinkers nor are they prone to collectively make up wild stories for centuries about denizen(s) in their swamps like some American might do for publicity. These people are archaic and remote. Your not going to see a *dino* posing still for Google Earth. The are mostly aquatic. There is much more evidence for you to see.
@MumblingMickey - If prehistoric creatures don't exist today then please explain the Coelacanth still being caught around Madagascar Africa today. Then there are OTHER non-African Lake Monsters arou
Alive!!
UChainT 2 weeks ago
The enigmatic ICA Stones depicted in beginning of video where possibly made by Antediluvian culture (Manchay Manco of Peru?). The Doctor that found them in a cave in Chivateros area in northern Peru found many THOUSANDS of them. There are still many more there. He died and left his museum in Lima to his family. The University of Penn & Peruvian govt. says they are all fakes. However, they can't explain HOW they are fakes. They depict dinosaurs interacting w/humans - ANOTHER INCONVENIENT TRUTH?
Spookysr 2 weeks ago
To get more data on the Peruvian ICA stones please read labyrinthina(dot)com/cabrera2.htm & then u be judge that this skepticism is massive cover up of another *inconvenient truth* for mainstream academia. The stones show Tyrannosaurus Rex as feathered and in an upright position in direct opposition to present theory. And how does a primitive hoaxer carve into diamond-like Andesite? And how do hoaxers even know ANYTHING about dinos in the 16th century when these were 1st brought back to Spain?
Spookysr 2 weeks ago
@Spookysr A guy who carved some of the dinosaurs admitted it years ago! Going along with this makes you look even more stupid... for your own sake, be quiet.
666popey666 1 week ago
@666popey666 - Yeah only to recant later saying that he was "forced" by Peruvian government to lie and say that. How do you explain the Ica Stones that turned up in Spain in 16th century? What did this guy have a magical time machine?
How did he fake over 100,000 stones in VERY hard Andesite? How did he use *comic books* to get new information depicted in the stones on dinos?
Yes a very inconvenient truth for you too I see...
Spookysr 1 week ago
@Spookysr Dinosaurs are indeed still around as such-we call them birds! Please look up dromaeosaurid theropods, there's a shit load of evidence but still some informed conjecture...oh, & lots of halfwit uneducated creationist types too. The feather symmetry/asymmetry argument supports evolution through NS too
666popey666 1 week ago
@666popey666 - Yes that is one theory based on hollow-bones which is a bit specious to me. However, there is hard evidence for large prehistoric *aquatic* creatures still existing worldwide.
Forget Creationist nonsense! I'm not advocating that Fundamentalist pablum-thinking (i.e. 6,000 year old Earth?). I'm presenting something else entirely, yet still involves a supernatural metaphysical super-sentient architect model which belies Natural Selection.
Spookysr 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@666popey666 - "...The feather symmetry/asymmetry argument supports evolution through NS too..."
I just don't see how. But I wasn't offering the *feathery T-Rex* story for that reason. I mention that the T-Rex models in the Ica Stones *seem* to depict feathers! Now we didn't discover that until American Paleontologists found just that in the Gobi Desert in China RECENTLY. The hoaxer was supposed to have made these highly detailed stones in 60's. I don't understand yr thought process here...
Spookysr 1 week ago
I think some dinosaurs are here. Hell we only explored 5% of the oceans...Each year or so, new species are being discovered. Megalodon was in the dino age.
juventinorocks 2 weeks ago
@juventinorocks - Truth be told the USNAVY has already photo-documented the cryptid prehistoric creature(s) (i.e. Mokele-Mbembe) in the D.R. of Congo in Likoula Swamps during *Operation Guardian Retrieval* in 1997. US Marines on long range patrol into Lake Tele and into the swamps encountered the beasties munching harmlessly on molombo tree fruit. They viewed it as an extreme oddity but where compelled by academia to keep it under wraps.
Use FOIA to make them produce the photos and reports.
Spookysr 2 weeks ago
To help you look at FOIA: Operation Guardian Retrieval/Congo and Zaire/17 March - 5 June 1997
Evacuation of over 1,000 US & Canadian citizens up and down Congo River during civil unrest in Rwanda. Joint Special Operations Task Force (JSOTF) had been formed, SOCEUR under Gen. Lambert and CTAFF commander Gen. Smith.
A 26th Marine Expeditionary unit in primitive pirogues (canoes) encountered and documented strange long necked animals in the Likoula swamp region. They looked like dinosaurs.
Spookysr 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Spookysr Yes that particular story is knocking about on all sorts of conspiracy theory sites, creationist rubbish sites and what not....
But oddly nobody seems to be able to produce these pictures..odd that...
If truth be told 'real truth' then the truth is there's no evidence of any of this total rubbish! But that won't stop you from 'wanting' it to be true, and confusing desire with reality.
Personally I'd like there to be dragons and aliens and all sorts of things... but there just aren't
MumblingMickey 2 weeks ago
@MumblingMickey - "Yes that particular story is knocking about on all sorts of conspiracy theory sites, creationist rubbish sites and what not...."
You can no more show credible evidence of that completely specious assertion than you can show plausible evidence that Evolution/NS is no longer still just a theory. You just like saying things that you wish were true and not just inconvenient truths for you.
Dragons & aliens COULD be misidentified reality to the un-informed viewer.
Spookysr 1 week ago
@Spookysr Yes but I don't need to offer any evidence that wild accusations that don't hold any water are rubbish...
Yes evolution is a theory, well done...
Of course my guess is you haven't the first clue what a theory is....
I suppose to you a theoretical physicist is a mathematician that guesses things a lot,
Sorry I hadn't realised you were a total fucking retard... so thats that conversation over with.
MumblingMickey 2 days ago
@Spookysr BTW...can you tell me what happens to a scientific discovery AFTER its 'just a theory'? Is there some sort of promotion a theory gets?
Tel you what, go look it up, then get back to me...
MumblingMickey 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@juventinorocks There are a lot of dinosaurs still here ...except when humans arrived and invented language we started to classify the animals... and were classified dinosaurs as birds since we didn't know about dinosaurs!
Birds don't have teeth... but do have the DNA to make teeth... they don't have many scales left... but dinosaurs had feathers and birds have the coding DNA for scales.
Plenty of dinosaurs... billions of them... I have one sitting on a perch in front of me right now...
MumblingMickey 2 weeks ago
I think Nessie and Champ are dinos that survived.
XxLonelyRainnxX 3 weeks ago
This is complete BULL SH*T. -|:-|
TheGreenTuxedo 3 weeks ago
dinosaurs aren't dead, birds, reptiles, crocodiles are living dinosaurs
TheSelfIndulgence 1 month ago
@TheSelfIndulgence eh birds are closer related to dinos then crocodiles, but they do kinda resemble a dinosaur :P
PokeTrainerDragonBoy 3 weeks ago
@PokeTrainerDragonBoy Dinosaurs I'm sure look reptilian... but then again marsupials look like all other mammals until you take a look at a duck billed platypus...
The fact is that all current reptiles AND all birds are descended from animals that came before the dinosaurs... So Dinosaurs, crocodiles and birds all share this one common ancestor.
MumblingMickey 2 days ago
@TheSelfIndulgence Birds descend from dinosaurs. They come from them, like a child to parent. They are technically dinosaurs (the smaller ones that didn't die out in the mass extinction then evolved to have feathers and look birdlike). Crocs and the rest of the reps are just living COUSINS of the dinos.
Btw, this video is complete and utter BS!
UpwardsFallings 2 weeks ago
@UpwardsFallings - You are being too absolute with this bird theory. The inventor of this theory does not even contend that it is "gospel truth". Its just a theory based on hollow-bones. To me that is SCANT evidence of genetic relationship. However, I'm not debunking bird/dino theory... I just say the jury is still out.
Spookysr 1 week ago
@Spookysr
really? and the inventor of the theory was who?
[btw in 24 years of reading scientific papers and journals, not once have I seen anyone state their idea was 'gospel truth'... which would be very odd anyway since the gospels don't agree with one another.]
Clearly you seem to know a lot about this...and since you read about it, I'm sure you'll tell us all where you find discrepancies... yes?
MumblingMickey 2 days ago
Ohh for fucks sake look at your channel... UFO's religious nuttery, dinosaurs and whatnot... either you are ten years old with an active imagination, or you are psychotic...
Hey did you know Obama secretly keeps dinosaurs in the white house rose garden... they have a top secret invisible force field to hide them...and Jesus and the aliens landed in a UFO and gave them to him....
prove me wrong... [rolls eyes]
MumblingMickey 2 days ago
@Spookysr When you find a dinosaur that has scales, teeth a tale, lays eggs and has all the features of a bird, and a dinosaur... then that's what it is...an avian dinosaur.
Anyway, who cares, what you don't know is that hot on the heels of the 'amazing red blood cell proof fossils aren't old' which is the nonsense you are fed, is the real science... the science that reconstructs dinosaur DNA from the 'fossilized' protein fragments.
Now when there is a DNA comparison, what will you say then?
MumblingMickey 2 days ago
@MumblingMickey - Listen Einstein...take all what you said and then apply it to the Platypus. Is it a bird? We recently now have T-Rex DNA from Montana USA. When the lady paleontologist that found it releases it we can then see if birds are related to at least T-Rexs. I will give in if that proves out.
Spookysr 1 day ago
@Spookysr And no, the jury is not out...
It is of course if you haven't read anything about it...
I'd say a feathered dinosaur that flies is more or less conclusive proof that there were feathered dinosaurs that flew.... the proof being in the finding of feathered dinosaurs that flew... see how finding the thing that proves the thing...sort of proves the thing...
MumblingMickey 2 days ago
@MumblingMickey - Why does a feathered dino have to fly? DO Ostriches, Emus, and Penguins fly?
I said that jury is still out on whether the "dinos are birds" theory is no longer a theory and now is fact. Try to stop twisting my words. Makes you look disingenuous.
Spookysr 1 day ago
@UpwardsFallings - "Btw, this video is complete and utter BS!"
Maybe the author's conjectures & assertions are unscientific and based on misunderstandings of reality - I'll agree. However, he is pointing out things that are being SEEN around the world and demand a BETTER explanation than specious theories from agenda-driven cabal-oriented evolutionists and atheists who have a "dog in this fight". Namely their much vaunted theories.
Spookysr 1 week ago
@UpwardsFallings actually they had feathers long before they could fly... its not like evolution has a mind.. .birds fly because they also have feathers , which help them to fly... they didn't evolve the feathers in order to fly.... before they could fly the feathers had other uses.
But dinosaurs had feathers too... one of the issues in the Jurassic park movies was that they didn't to paint the velociraptors and the baby t-rex with feathers.
MumblingMickey 2 days ago
@MumblingMickey Yes, that's true. They did have feathers, though not all of them.
UpwardsFallings 1 day ago
ITs a proven fact we know more about the moon then about the depth and area of our own earths oceans. what do u think could be down there?
M4gicHat 1 month ago
@M4gicHat Water perhaps?
MumblingMickey 2 days ago
Just because we have dinosaur fossil doesn't mean they're extinct. We had fossils of the coelacanth, and thought they were extinct. But it turned out they you can find them, if you know where to look. Some of the great lakes of so large and deep, that there are parts of them that no ship has ever been to. Who knows what lives there.
Nomoreidsleft 1 month ago
@Nomoreidsleft - What do you think we've been debating for the past 12 hours!
Spookysr 1 month ago
@Spookysr Well, there's no use debating it. Someone just has to find one.
Nomoreidsleft 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Nomoreidsleft - "Well, there's no use debating it. Someone just has to find one."
Ummmm... well isn't that what a Coelacanth is? So basically BTDT right? I mean In 2002, the South African Coelacanth Conservation and Genome Resource Program was launched to help further the studies and conservation of this prehistoric animal.
With right resources from our US NAVY we might catch other cryptozoologicals too. But I won't hold my breath as there is too much "opposition" to actually do anything.
Spookysr 2 weeks ago
"Opposition" comes from the powerful mainstream academia who don't want these prehistoric creatures found and captured as they introduce an EXTREME "inconvenient truth" to an already specious and highly agenda-driven theory of our true origins. I think "they" wished they'd all just evaporate away and we go on watching Television for our brainwashing "education" (i.e. "Millions and millions of years..." - Dr. Carl Sagan).
Spookysr 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Nomoreidsleft "Well, there's no use debating it. Someone just has to find one."
That's the point, there really is no evidence until there is evidence.
However generally speaking that is not what Spookysr thinks. He only needs nobody showing there AREN'T dinosaurs to accept there are.
And even then...with the entire world photographed... every meter of it... he still insists they might be 'somewhere' ... perhaps hiding out up the odd cherry tree.. ninja dinosaurs...
MumblingMickey 2 days ago
@Nomoreidsleft Coelacanth are not a species of fish, they are an entire order of fish.
None of the fossilized Coelacanth are the same as the species of Coelacanth in the seas right now.
Also sauropods did not live their entire lives in water, didn't live in forests (they couldn't cos given the size of a herd after a little time there wouldn't be a forest), plus they simply couldn't survive without the atmosphere they lived in.
That does not mean new species are not discovered every day.
MumblingMickey 2 days ago
@MumblingMickey - But the Coelacanth is still an inconvenient truth for people like you.
The cabal that is saying that Loch Ness and Congo creatures are sauropods are all wet! (Pun intended). My theory they are elasmosaurs or pliesosaurs which are aquatic prehistoric creatures.
Spookysr 1 day ago
in Palawan there is a tyrannosaur... but the smaller version.. it was raised by the natives and believe to be the holy animal... it's forbidden to go there
Robotcobray 1 month ago
@Robotcobray - Yeah I heard that too. But it was Isla Sorna - Site C. It's a research station of InGen Inc. Somehow Dr. John Hammond convinced Dr. Mary Higby Schweitzer of NCSU to give up some of her soft tissue from the marrow cavity of a fossilized tyrannosaur leg bone (specimen 1125/MOR 1125) found at Hell Creek Formation at Jordan Montana USA.
Dr. H wasn't sure Site C's stable so they're sending in US Navy ST-6 team w/Dr. Ian Malcolm to investigate.
What does SORNA mean in Spanish?
Spookysr 1 month ago
@Robotcobray - Here's an actual photo of the baby Tyrannosaur at Site C. US News Reporters were invited to the island to get press photos before Dr. Hammond releases this new chimera to the world. Notice how tame he is (or was*).
tinyurl(dot)com/7uws5ek
*This is what happens when you piss one of them off:
tinyurl(dot)com/cw5lxzg
Source: LATIMES
Spookysr 1 month ago
thats a whale
NXWolf 1 month ago
so in conclusion, they're dead
mynameisntrosie 1 month ago
Spoiler alert! they're dead.
Cinthorc 1 month ago
In my opinion middle white america have lost the plot. I believe this page is absolute evidence of its existance. Canada and S Africa step away from the edge. Austrailian guy - the shining light in a pointless debate. USA, junk food comes in many forms.
MrAlanmcmahon 1 month ago
@MrAlanmcmahon UFO's, Dinosaurs, Floods, Aliens, Yeti's and Sasquatch, Loch Ness Monsters and Magic Crystels, Fucking Homeopathy... sheesh...
The list is expanding... the only thing Americans don't accept is all the things they can demonstrate are real...
It like living on a planet full of 5 year olds.
MumblingMickey 2 days ago
Of course they're real. Yeti, Sasquatch, Quetzalcoatl, Loch Ness Monster, chupacabras, dinosaurs - they all hang out together and watch each others' backs. That's why we haven't been able to find any of them.
ChipArgyle 2 months ago
I believe some dinosaurs are still alive. I think it's so cool. And I believe that scientists are so ignorant to the truth that they refuse to even look at the evidence
gabs616 2 months ago
mate, crocodiles exist, they're dinosaurs
MrEd7003 2 months ago 2
Lying for Jesus I see.
BackInTheCage 2 months ago 2
There have not been any dino blood cells that weren't fossilized. That's a lie creationists have been floating around out there. Show me or shut up on this one because I know it's a blatant lie.
That's a picture of drift wood not Champ. Look at the original picture and not the cropped one. You can tell that the object isn't that big.
Eyewitness Sketch? Really? lol
xdassinx 2 months ago
@xdassinx As a christian...and until very, very recently a biblical literalist... I do have to both agree and disagree here...
Firstly... yes I DID go an read up on what these 'red blood cells' actually were...I'm not very scientifically minded but I do understand they are neither cells nor blood....
My disagreement comes with your approach... cynicism and looking down your nose is not the best approach... its the one that stopped me from taking science seriously all my life.
LoveJCForLife 2 months ago
@LoveJCForLife Well, the cynicism and looking down my nose was directed at the person posting this video. I gave trying to be nice a good long try there. And got treated like the village idiot by people I'm frankly amazed can function in the world let alone tie their own shows.
If you have the faith to keep Christ while not ignoring science. You probably have a better understanding of what FAITH is then the fundamentalists. Good luck to you.
xdassinx 2 months ago
@xdassinx "If you have the faith to keep Christ while not ignoring science. You probably have a better understanding of what FAITH is then the fundamentalists"
Well, I found at almost every turn that what I am told of science by almost everyone of faith is simply not accurate.
That has no impact on my faith, but it does lead me wondering where people are getting their information from.
In the long run I think accepting silly notions that later turn out to be false will destroy peoples faith.
LoveJCForLife 1 month ago
@LoveJCForLife I couldn't agree more on all points.
Fundamentalists, and so called Evangelical Conservatives (I'm beginning to just use the word Zealot any more) have an on going disinformation campaign going on.
It's sometimes difficult to find a a legitimate source to fact check or research something to do with evolution with the clutter of numerous creationist web sites all saying the same thing.
It can be frustrating. And like you said, counter productive.
xdassinx 1 month ago
@xdassinx and the evolutionists have a disinformation campaign /lies going on for years.look up behys black box,he WAS one of the top evolutionists.
hey the other day i saw a dog evolve into a cat......
SHARKREEF2011 1 month ago
@SHARKREEF2011 You're a dumb ass. You know how I know you're a dumb ass. Because I'm going to have to help you make your failed argument, because you even failed at making it... Because you're a dumb ass.
It isn't Behys black box fukwit. It is Darwin's Black Box by Michael Behe. Never a top scientist.
So Behe is your best bet. This the horse your backing Johnny? Behe and his irreducible complexity idea have been thoroughly refuted.
watch?v=W96AJ0ChboU
Check out my playlist on the subject.
xdassinx 1 month ago
@SHARKREEF2011 Ohh for heavens sake forget about evolution...faith has nothing to do with evolution.
And I think it was about a year ago I used that same Dog evolves into a cat argument myself.
But I knew then, as you do now, but are scared to bits to admit it, that it has nothing to do with evolution.
Its like him telling you the bible says Jesus and Santa were brothers ... its just nonsense and all three of us know that.
And you know what when I realised that I stopped getting insulted.
LoveJCForLife 1 month ago
@LoveJCForLife
More important than that if you truly value your faith... if you really do believe Jesus Christ, If you really really want to follow the teachings of what I consider to be the greatest person that ever lived. Then you will do yourself a very big favor and reconcile both the findings of science and the teaching of Christ.
If you don't you will be a very sorry individual for it! But angrily jumping up and down insisting science is wrong just isn't going to help you do that.
LoveJCForLife 1 month ago
@xdassinx Well personally it is counterproductive to the point where neither of my parents will even discuss my brothers, its as if they don't exist. Which is very hard coming up to the holidays. Both are now atheists (having been raised as strong Christians)
Only 3 or 4 months ago I got into a debate with my brother who simply asked me questions, I simply had no answers for... it was the silly answers online that told me somebody was clearly in breech of Ex 20:16... and it wasn't my brother.
LoveJCForLife 1 month ago
@xdassinx
CONT. And I know four things in life when it comes to faith.
1. My brother would never willingly lie to me
2. Neither would my parents.
3. I am being lied to....
4. The numbers are not adding up
I even caught one christian out bold face lying to me .... with crap I knew she knew was totally fabricated.
Then I realised I too had done the same to her.... she must have known....she's not stupid.... there's no way she believed anything I was saying... I didn't.
LoveJCForLife 1 month ago
@xdassinx I also know what you are referring to with this 'disinformation' campaign... I know that because I and almost everyone I know are part of it... mostly unwittingly...
But I know now that scientists are not out to 'get me'...which was a pretty stupid idea from the get go! Or that they are all deluded, which is equally stupid.
But I do not blame evangelical Christians for that...
I blame the people who really don't care what I think about science.
Those would be the scientists.
LoveJCForLife 1 month ago
@LoveJCForLife Well, I don't know why you'd blame scientists. Zelots, or if you want to call them evangelical Christians are spending millions of dollars to spread falsehoods. While science is working to gain a greater understanding of the nature of the world. Theories that lead to practice technologies, medicine and treatments and the like.
There are scientists on youtube making videos debunking the pseudoscience of creationism because they do care.
xdassinx 1 month ago
@xdassinx I blame scientist because they claim to be the voice of reason, education, and discovery and in my entire life I have never seen one scientist (except on TV) yet there are reportedly millions of them.
If they really believe in these things (do not say they don't need belief) then why are they not promoting them to the population. Why does someone think cats are supposed to have evolved from dogs? why does someone think birds are mammals?
Clearly this a fault of scientists.
LoveJCForLife 1 month ago
CONT. Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying science people are bad at science. I'm saying they don't care about the rest of us.
It seems to me that every piece of information you might want to read costs lots of money (I thought my kids schoolbooks were expensive) and if you do get the information it all assumes you are some sort of brainiac scientist.
well I'm not but I might at some point like to know how an LCD tv works or how to build a website without a ton of gibberish I don't understand.
LoveJCForLife 1 month ago
@LoveJCForLife Since your comment is at the top, and it relates to me personally let me address that.
Yes a lot of science is for the most part 'gibberish' to the public. However in my field I have no choice but to explain things using math or very precise and complex language. that's the way it is.
But I will agree that scientists have dropped the ball explaining findings in a language the general public can easily understand.
The public does deserve better. But thats also not our job!
MumblingMickey 1 month ago
@MumblingMickey - Oh give me a break. If you are a lettered scientist you are just another bandwagon-wananbe-to-mainstream-academia parroting the latest dogma you really don't quite fully understand nor could you formulate an hypotheses based on your own work NOT related to what your professor(s) indoctrinated you in class. You would not listen to specious Cryptogzoology theories fearing ostracism or marginalization from your precious academia over-lords.
Spookysr 1 month ago
@Spookysr
"Oh give me a break. If you are a lettered scientist you are just another bandwagon-wananbe-to-mainstream-academia parroting...blah blah... "
ahh the old 'all the scientists are a conspiracy out to get me' nonsense... that didn't take long to surface. Bit like the elephant in the vid really.
Yeah sure... we're all out to get you woooohhh [cue spooky music]
Dogma? lol..On balance I think I'll just laugh my bollox off, you are seriously some crazy weirdo and great entertainment.
MumblingMickey 1 month ago
@MumblingMickey - "...ahh the old 'all the scientists are a conspiracy out to get me' nonsense... that didn't take long to surface. Bit like the elephant in the vid really..."
No... not all.. just you and your ilk.
Elephant? What time stamp is that in video. I don't remember seeing that. I'll look again and comment on it.
Spookysr 1 month ago
@MumblingMickey - Are you saying 0:40 was an elephant? Now I'm LMAO at you. This was the Sandra Mansi (of New Haven CT USA) photo. I interviewed her at Burlington VT and studied satellite imagery to discover the actual location of the photo. We did backgrounding on her and her story. Even the US Federal Govt and Military got into the fray (out of idle curiosity). Her story is bona fide. It was not an elephant! IMHO It was a here-to-fore unidentified long-necked deep lake creature in Vermont USA.
Spookysr 1 month ago
Anonymous scientists at Univ of VT Burlington helped a local reoccurring eye-witness identify them as possibly being from family: Tanystrophidae. I prefer to think they are Plesiosauroidea. However, the 2005 Affolter and Bodette video was just stunning. The media (not the content) was termed bona-fide not faked by the US FBI. I'm trying to get a copy of the video right now. It was on ABC News-com for a while but thanks to mainstream-academia its been summarily pulled from Internet (for now).
Spookysr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Spookysr sheesh...... yeah obviously you think its a dinosaur... its an elephant.... you can see its an elephant... in fact an african elephant... 'Loxodonta'
Now if I can even tell what species of elephant it is whats wrong with you?
Also I'm sure without any satellite images... in fact even in the 1800's you'd be able to reason yourself that if herds of dinosaurs 50 feet long were hiding out in a forest...then pretty soon there would be no forest!
MumblingMickey 2 weeks ago
@LoveJCForLife
So here is my predicament.
If we were having this conversation 300 years ago then yes, I could probably give imparting what I know to you a good try in simple language.
But, in 2011 information has grown so massively that I just don't have all the answers. Its contained in a body of knowledge that exceeds anyones ability to explain it to you in full. If you don't know what you are looking for you can't find it!
BTW you now met a scientist. Congratulations, for what its worth.
MumblingMickey 1 month ago
@LoveJCForLife And on that note...what the hell is this silly video actually about?
I'm back in the nonsense area of youtube again...I suppose in the comedy stakes it beats that cat playing the piano...
y'see it not only you having issue with search engines and youtube...
MumblingMickey 1 month ago
@MumblingMickey
1- Radio Isotope Dating systems are self-admittedly wrong past 5ky.
2- Bonobo apes found in COngo (unknown species)
3-Wrong!
4-Mokele Nmebe IMO is an Elasmosaur or Pliesosaur. They think their flippers didn't have claws. The creatures leave huge claw prints.
5- That's retarded. The Blue Whale is larger than any creature EVER and is still alive breathing our air today. Continued
Spookysr 1 month ago
Continuing -
6-Leprechauns have a basis for a misidentified scenario. Diminutive people leave in tribes in Africa (Kalahari Bushmen). If a Caucasian-version practiced the Occult (magic) in New Hibernia (ancient Ireland) then an observer could be forgiven for exaggerating and embellishing a real experience with a heretofore unidentified tribal group.
Spookysr 1 month ago
@Spookysr @MumblingMickey
On my list there..
1.I have no idea why you addressed the population of the world in 1911 as having anything to do with radiometrics.
2. Bonobos are not an unknown species you idiot.
3. Every square inch of the planet has been mapped, photographed and measured. With emphasis on war zones! Tough luck..
4. no its not, because its just made up, and theres no evidence.
5. Blue whales are mammals, they live in the sea, they are not dinosaurs.
Stop babbling crap.
MumblingMickey 1 month ago
@MumblingMickey
1. Population of 1911? Don't remember doing that - explain please.
2. Obviously I meant to say Bonobos W-H-E-R-E unknown in the Congo Basin until they were eventually discovered - duh!
3. This is moronic as NOAA STILL wants to continue ocean mapping despite Pentagon dissent. Try checking the areas I quoted this time. Also satellite imagery is NOT mapping if you have no boots on ground to verify land targets/roads/etc.
4. We were talking about BREATHING giants? Not genera.
Spookysr 1 month ago
@Spookysr Also Since I know how radiometrics works and you don't then I can tell you with 100% confidence and 100% accuracy that radiometric dating cannot simply not work past 5k years... if it works for 100 years it works for 100 million years, Ironically a lot of radiometrics won't work UNDER 5k years!
Its not something that is physically capable of not working...
I'm sure you were informed somewhere that is the case...but its like saying a ball can roll one foot but not 3 feet.
MumblingMickey 1 month ago
CONT. Now after I pick my nutsack up...which fell off earlier whilst wiping tears of laughter from my eyes....
Maybe you might like to explain to the good ladies and gentlemen here something you insist is correct.
Heres the expression of decay over time.
D = D0 + N(t) (eλt − 1)
Now how does this formula suddenly stops working if t is a 6k years?
No I didn't think so.. that's because you comment on shit you know fuck all about and heard from an idiot that also knows fuck all about it!
MumblingMickey 1 month ago
To help you out here let 't' be time,
D be the quantity of atoms of the daughter isotope,
D0 is your starting point for the daughter isotope.
N is the quantity of parent isotope atoms.
λ is your decay constant, you can put any element in here that has a half life longer than say 100 years.
Now I expect you to know sweet fuck all about decay rates and radioactivity...... but it will at least explain to you how you know nothing but think you do!
I've now practically done this for you..
MumblingMickey 1 month ago
@MumblingMickey - Your show-off algorithm was really unnecessary. The salient point is that dendrochronology is 100% more accurate than these methods as external radiation contamination can skew the results to the exposed-to-elements sample. Dendrochronology has demonstrated that these methods are faulty on a order of magnitude after 50,000 years. What you fail to see is that the original sample's quantity can be upwardly skewed mathematically throwing off your final results.
Spookysr 1 month ago
@MumblingMickey - After picking yourself up and wiping up those tears maybe you should check your facts:
D = D0 + N(t) (eλt − 1)
I'm no subject matter expert, but are you absolutely sure this algorithm you quickly copied down from your reference material is correct? I'm just saying it looks slightly wrong to me. But your the expert so I won't LMAO at you...
I wanna' call you TWISTER. B/c you really know how to twist ppl's words around to fit your agenda. You'd make a good Psyops Ranger here.
Spookysr 1 month ago
@Spookysr Yes I'm positive... its accurate. you can say what you like. but you saying isotopes don't decay beyond 50k y a and me seeing they do, and can be measured to do so.. well you may as well be telling me all ducks have one leg.
Nonsense is one thing... but to be telling people things you don't understand are not possible... when they do? Well frankly that's an exercise in stupidity I'm not getting involved in..
Just go look it up. If you don't understand thats not my problem.
MumblingMickey 2 days ago
@MumblingMickey - You do a wonderful job of misquoting me or are you just functionally illiterate? I meant that radiometrics is not reliable for dating anything because you do not know how much the sample had when it died. Therefore there is no point of reference to say how many is left today when you date it. I did not say that the formula or process you use is flawed. It seems you have
Spookysr 1 day ago
... it seems you difficulty understanding things outside your strictly narrow paradigms.
Spookysr 1 day ago
@MumblingMickey - Let me correct myself: Radioisotope Dating is empirically WRONG on an order of magnitude past 50ky (not 5ky as I incorrectly said) as scientist discovered by comparing to Dendrochronology. Therefore, MILLIONS & MILLIONS of years is simply a bloated miscalculation for the origins of life. However, I am NOT saying Fundamentalist 6-solar days nor 6,000 year old Earth makes any sense either. IMO the problem is external radiation contamination of test samples.
Spookysr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xdassinx "It's sometimes difficult to find a a legitimate source to fact check or research something to do with evolution "
Well I don't know how you use a search engine but if i type in something like 'what is evolution' I get wikipedia at the top of the list I got no science websites.
Now christian or not thats what someone will type, yes? no? Remember a year ago I was under the impression a scientific theory was a best guess under the circumstances.
Type in the word theory into google.
LoveJCForLife 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xdassinx- "There have not been any dino blood cells that weren't fossilized."
Dr. Mary Higby Schweitzer of NCSU found soft tissue from the marrow cavity of a fossilized tyrannosaur leg bone (specimen 1125/MOR 1125) found at Hell Creek Formation at Jordan Montana USA.
Jeez - you should check your facts before being so dogmatic and absolute. (Sound: pulling your foot out of your mouth?)
ABC News has film footage of Champ in 2005. It appears to be an sub-aquatic prehistoric creature.
Spookysr 1 week ago
Idk y I heard this but I have heard that scientists r bringing dinosaurs back from frog DNA and the Mosquitos that were caught in tree sap…I mean why play God? And crate shit that was meant to be dead ???
dudesrock1000 2 months ago
@dudesrock1000 u watch and read too much jurassic park
ef3erfrq3rerf 2 months ago
absolute nonsense... It's no coincidence that all the morons of this world sit on one side insisting on this nonsense and everyone else laughs their head off at them.
LoveJCForLife 2 months ago
Cont. also from a recent PM don't get me wrong. I am in fact a very religious person, and I certainly count myself (inasmuch as anyone can claim to be) a good christian.
But that position no longer requires me to ignore the obvious to protect God. God is well able to defend himself....better than I ever could. Why would anyone believe this nonsense? I still don't know why I did!
Especially since all the information you need to make a call on it is available at your fingertips these days!
LoveJCForLife 2 months ago
...Noobs Comment "Im in That Weird Part of youtube again" Just to get in The top comments..
WarLordPing 2 months ago
god is a lie
luka7646 2 months ago
The bird crap teridactial its real no joke I got chased by it wen I was 4 now iam 12 so its no joke I thought I was dreaming its no joke
Eliscioworld 3 months ago
LMAO I OF COURSE BELIEVE THIS SHIT BECAUSE I DRANK STARBUCKS COFFEE THROUGH MY NOSE MY WHOLE LIFE AND I WATCH FOX WHILE I SLEEP.
frankfurt316 3 months ago
I'm not Christian, and I don't believe this, but dinosaurs living among humans is probably the only thing I wish that Young Earth Creationists were right about.
cooperon1229 3 months ago
Well that settles it for me...all the proof you need that dinosaurs are still running wild in a neat little video.
CaptainCPike 3 months ago
Guess what dragons were???
habfan24 3 months ago
Yo what the fuck man they didn't have to draw my nigga dino like that he's just a purple dinosaur tryin to fit in
impresioname33 3 months ago
0:39 could be anything.
0:40 is an elephant swimming. Only head and trunk is partly visible.
0:47 is...nothing?!
0:49, 0:58 is a painting?!?! Those long necked things are called Giraffes;)
Overall horrible video!
LarryLynx 3 months ago 13
@LarryLynx
While I can't say I think all of this video's content is authentic, the allusion to tyrannosaurus rex blood cells at 0:38 is quite correct. See 'Scientists recover T. rex soft tissue' in the science section on msnbc.com, or just conduct a Google search. The photographs are genuine. And there have been rumours of extant dinosaurs circulating around central Africa. Ever heard of Mokele-mbembe, or Ngoubou? I am not saying any of this is true, but it is open to speculation and debate.
xTheNomadx 3 months ago
@xTheNomadx I understand, my friend. However, people finding a video named like this are most probably expecting more solid material than the pictures in this video. I understand now that this was edited and posted to make people speculate, but if this is the case I would suggest that you change the title to "Dinosaurs, do they still exist?". I don't want to come across rude at all, but I am a biologist and all these videos claiming to prove anything sort of sickens me. They never do...
LarryLynx 3 months ago
@xTheNomadx As I mentioned to another poster, I thought these things were debatable too. Then someone asked me to substantiate these ideas.
So to prove them wrong I done just that and went off an read up what they were etc.
Unfortunately for me I ended up realizing just the opposite. The things you mentioned are on fact all documented... even the Mokele-mbembe came originally from a childrens book and is not debatable since the source is known.
Which leads to a very worrying question.
LoveJCForLife 2 months ago
@xTheNomadx Also one thing I have discovered during my goal of separating the chaff from the wheat in these things is as follows. The media don't do science very well, they just tell you things that you can research.
But then when you actually look at the actual story...its nowhere near what MSNBC said it was.
In my case I read Mary Schweitzer's research (the woman who discovered it). Its not what you think, or what MSNBC told you, and certainly not what I was told on either AIG or Watchtower.
LoveJCForLife 2 months ago
@LoveJCForLife
Fair enough. However, I was not alluding to the article's content - I was referring to the authenticity of the photos of the blood cells.
xTheNomadx 2 months ago
@LarryLynx You have to admit that it has epic background music though.
cooperon1229 3 months ago
@cooperon1229 That it is=)
LarryLynx 3 months ago
The soft tissue in fossils are a bugger for paleontologists
noobbeekeep 3 months ago
*blink blink* ookaayyy then...
MsPyroManiac666 3 months ago
Nessi! There you are at least!
Muahahahaha!
Goultek 3 months ago
Atheist evolutionist can be shown the evidence in their face, and they still manage to talk shit that's not even revelant to the argument. It's not in the matter of evidence for them, but the matter of popularity belief; therefore it only "discredit" the video.
digga115 3 months ago 6
@digga115 If the Bible said that the earth was millions of years old you would believe it, and that Sir is the reason your opinion about anything is irrelevant you are a sheep echoing the dribble of a outdated poorly written piece of literature that has already been proved wrong in every way and then you have the cheek to say other people are ignoring evidence? What a load of offal lol
GIVEmeSOMEsugarBA8Y 3 months ago
@GIVEmeSOMEsugarBA8Y Hipacritical comment, I'll say. If you've lived back in the 1500's, scientists said the earth was flat, you would have believed them more than likely. Bible however did say the earth was round. Back then, scientists used to estimate that there were only 3,000 stars while the bible said there's more stars than there's grains of sands of the earth. Going with your argument, you would have believed that there were only 3,000 stars back then. So please, shut your biasm ass up.
digga115 3 months ago
@digga115 But that is my point when i am wrong i can adjust when the bible is wrong you will stick your finger in your ears.
Why has it got to be all or nothing with you Christians, with you its ether everything in the bible is right or you are a Atheist Marxist Jew or what ever hate spills out of Glenn Beck's mouth these days. evolution has not been a controversial subject for the better part of a century you are basically trying to convince people that 2+2=10 and they are not swallowing.
GIVEmeSOMEsugarBA8Y 3 months ago
@GIVEmeSOMEsugarBA8Y I can watch the video again, and then I read your comment, then you say I'm trying to convince people that 2 + 2= 4? Honestly, why the fuck am I even arguing with you? The video just showed you straight up evidence, then you somehow call me delusional? :-/ This is exactly why I stopped arguing with atheists a long time ago. :-)
digga115 3 months ago
@digga115 Yes it does get a little tiresome i agree.
GIVEmeSOMEsugarBA8Y 3 months ago
@GIVEmeSOMEsugarBA8Y Fuck this crap, why can't we all just get along instead of mocking and arguing about our beliefs of the orgins of the world? We should all respect and observe each others' beliefs with an unbiased conclusions instead of trying to cut our heads off of what we believe.
digga115 3 months ago
@digga115
"why can't we all just get along"
Because some of us might actually have spent many years in university at our own expense to get qualifications that allow us to work in a field that will benefit the rest of humanity using real science and observing the real world. ..
Meanwhile fuckwits that haven't done a useful thing in their miserable lives produce bullshit like this which holds back the general publics perception of science, lowers funding and damages progress!
Thats why!
LoveJCForLife 2 months ago
@LoveJCForLife Okay, now you're just being a total dick about it. First off, there's fossils of shoe imprints found in trilobites fossils. Radioactive dating had been tested on Hawaii's dried lava (rocks) that were actually 20 years old. Dated, and it came out to be 23,000 years old. A living snail was dated to be hundred thousand years old. It's just some things that damages your beliefs, and you tend to say it's killing the work of general knowledge of science.
digga115 2 months ago
@digga115
"First off, there's fossils of shoe imprints found in trilobites fossils...... and other nonsense blah blah"
Yeah I thought so too until I was challenged to provide the source of this story... now I check to see if its true...try it yourself.
You don't have to believe total and utter nonsense to be a good christian, or a good person.
But if you continue thinking this nonsense is valid then when you finally realise its nonsense it will damage your faith.
LoveJCForLife 2 months ago
@GIVEmeSOMEsugarBA8Y (continuation) And I know this video hurt your feelings because they showed ancient drawings of dinosaurs. So in an unbiased conclusions, it's basically saying that dinosaurs were more than likely living less than millions of years ago. I tried to be friendly with you about it, but I just have to be a dick to you. The only fuckwit around here is you, fuck boy.
digga115 2 months ago
@digga115 LMAO why the hell would it hurt my feelings? if dinosaurs lived less than a million years ago it wouldn't bother me let alone "hurt me" born again Christians are truly a bizarre breed but are funny in a novelty kind of way, now off to bed early tonight you got rubbish to learn in church in the morning maybe you will get a visit from Ray Comfort and please remember not to read anything but the Bible and ignore everyone who does not OK sweetie?
GIVEmeSOMEsugarBA8Y 2 months ago
@GIVEmeSOMEsugarBA8Y Hehe, like I said before, give evidence the bitch, still talk shit and insult, but doesn't refute...
digga115 2 months ago
@digga115 lol OK whatever you say I believe you.....Honest.
GIVEmeSOMEsugarBA8Y 2 months ago
BOLLOCKS. Having said that i think there are dinosaurs but on other planets. After all they existed once so maybe they still exist on other planets!.
blindinglights02 3 months ago
@blindinglights02 Think harder.
aClockworkBoec 3 months ago
@aClockworkBoec I will thanks
blindinglights02 3 months ago
MY ASS there is still dinosaurs we would all be eaten by now
121dominick 4 months ago
bullshiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit
BOBPOPROCK 4 months ago
we need turok
snakeeater366 4 months ago
It's a fish...
KjalliZ 4 months ago
Mayne they just steped away and are not the main species (they don't rule it we do) and i think the sam is going to happen with humans. Were going to be around here for milions of years but won't be the most powerful species something else will.
Lanmanfly 4 months ago
There are still yet places that aren't fully explored yet......
EVERYBODY HEAD OUT!!!
Buu885 4 months ago
Thumbs up for no reason
0643016 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
all they want is money hahaha
Mrnakatsu09 4 months ago
ive seen a bird with a 4 to 5 metre wingspan, it looked like a sub species of dasornis
magnusalexa 4 months ago
im in that weird part of youtube again..........
curlycurlsgirls 4 months ago 35
Dinosaurs never existed, never did, and never will... watch?v=a6GSdIr21JA
mustaffa1611 4 months ago
@mustaffa1611 they did exist but not anymore they are ALLL dead
valer0ckz12 4 months ago
This stuff is always interesting, but isn't in more likely ancient people found dinosaur bones like we do? And guessed how they looked?
tacomadc 4 months ago
notice how it seems every eyewitness is a great drawer...-.-
soulknitters 4 months ago
Dr. Dennis Swift what the fuck are you talking about you point at a fucking table with random shit on it, than a old guy says he saw a pterosaurs. This video is so retarded and trust me i have a open mind i do believe other life is out in the universe but seriously the dinosaurs these psychopaths are reporting are gone and extinct, with 6 billion humans on earth it wouldn't be unreasonable to think if a fuckin t rex was here we would know by know....... jesus christ fucking retards
ScruFFsaNdmagGs 4 months ago
@ScruFFsaNdmagGs - He's pointing at ICA STONES from Lima Peru. There is NO WAY that these petroglyph stones are a clever hoax as they were found in a deep cave where the finder said there were over 100,000 of them of various sizes to hand sized to statue size. And it was in a year where dinosaurs were a new word to most people especially in a 3rd world country like Peru. Also scientists say that the stones could not be etched that easily & is mystery wat used. Depict dinos interacting w/humans.
Spookysr 4 months ago
hey guess wat! i have news too! look around there are dinosaurs millions of yrs old (reptiles: turtles) see turtles can live up to 100 yrs! :P on tht
Kh2luver00 4 months ago
How did this pop up on U.F.O. videos?
shanferg1 4 months ago
HAHAHAHAHAHA
VitalSigns1 4 months ago
the lions killed all the long-necked dinosaurs
liudxdx 4 months ago
Read the Bible - Dino buddies are in there. Dinos DID infact live with man. Man wiped dinosaurs out.
LizardsInMyHouse 4 months ago
It's Kakio!!!
RedRosesLast4eva 4 months ago
"...Flintstones, meet the Flintstones..."
5jerry1 4 months ago
Videos like this one and some of the credulous responses underneath are sad examples of the low level of the critical thinking skills exhibited by people in this country. The educational system must not be doing its job nor are parents if young people can grow up thinking utter nonsense like this might be true. Shame.
sailcat9 4 months ago
If dinosaurs were proven to exist, that would probably disprove evolution and oh boy THEY would find that humiliating :P
BeakyRed 4 months ago
@BeakyRed How would it prove evolution untrue?
brmadman4455 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@brmadman4455 Because it would mean that the dinosaurs didn't evolve
BeakyRed 4 months ago
the guy at the beginning of this video must have issues lol 6 billion humans roam earth if there was a mafuckin t rex i think we would know LOLL soo gay
ScruFFsaNdmagGs 4 months ago 3
@ScruFFsaNdmagGs
100 years ago, when 100 million people roamed the Earth they used the same silly argument against the existence of Gorillas. This is until they explored the world more and found them, same argument was used against Giant Squid until 50 years ago when it was discovered as well.
Over 80% of the land mass of this planet is wilderness, over 50% of the Earth's land mass has yet to be deeply explored. There is plenty of things to find, if we only but look.
ViCe1986 4 months ago
@ViCe1986
1. 100 years ago 100million? try 1.6 billion...16 times larger
2. Gorillas are mentioned in greek and roman literature
3. literally every square inch of the earth is mapped and photographed in high resolution.
4. Saurapods were the size of a 4 story building, they traveled in herds, hard to miss!
5. Dinosaurs of that size with that chest cavity required oxygen we no longer have on earth!
6. Given your knowledge I'd expect you to believe in leprechauns too!
MumblingMickey 1 month ago
@ScruFFsaNdmagGs - There may be no T-Rex's roaming about but how about several Elasmosaurs (or arguably Diplodicus) cavorting in Dja River in Cameroon (Africa) and Democratic Republic of Congo (Africa) in Likoula Swamp and Lake Tele? Its now getting very good coverage and is not just some wishful thinking like other living-dino reports. The creatures have overwhelming and compelling eye-witness and photo evidence. Even our US Military had an encounter in 1997. Google Mokele-Mbembe.
Spookysr 4 months ago
@Spookysr Yeah just looked at that on google earth...sorry no huge 3 storey monsters traveling in herds through the swampy marsh.
Sorry about that, but third hand stories related by african tribes people inclined to tell you anything for a bottle of whiskey and a dollar in change is not exactly what you might call valid, repeatable and demonstrable evidence.
Amazed you accept this shit with fuck all evidence but when it comes to real evidence you duck for cover like a 1950's cartoon turtle.
MumblingMickey 1 month ago
@MumblingMickey Also there is no photo evidence... the ONLY image ever supposedly taken was by a guy and his wife who claimed they took a shaky image but it was destroyed and they were with a bunch or 28 other people who seen nothing
The funny thing is if you took a picture of a penguin and showed it to any congalese bushman he would happily tell you there are loads of them living in the river, and for a dollar he'll take you there.
Then again creationists would happilly swallow a house.
MumblingMickey 1 month ago
@MumblingMickey - Spoken by a man who knows too little (LOL). I see you have done absolutely no research into the back-story of Moleke-nmembe. The Bantu are hardly "whiskey" drinkers nor are they prone to collectively make up wild stories for centuries about denizen(s) in their swamps like some American might do for publicity. These people are archaic and remote. Your not going to see a *dino* posing still for Google Earth. The are mostly aquatic. There is much more evidence for you to see.
Spookysr 1 month ago
@MumblingMickey - If prehistoric creatures don't exist today then please explain the Coelacanth still being caught around Madagascar Africa today. Then there are OTHER non-African Lake Monsters arou