Added: 4 years ago
From: navyseal4404
Views: 44,371
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • . whoever says artillery is useless is, well sadly the dumbest person alive .. 212FA Fort Bliss 1Armour Division hooah

  • "Grad", "Uragan", "Smerch" say Hallo!

  • @ECWUSA1995..... this is an Israeli weapon system u fucking retard typical yank stupid cunt

  • @kevyoung980

    *Lockheed Martin Vought* Texas-Dallas

  • @kevyoung980 You are a retard. This system is built by Lockheed Martin which bought Vought who design it here in the USA. The Israel has them along with several other countries but they did not design the MLRS or the HIMARS. The GLMRS rounds are gps guided and also build by Lockheed Martin. Please do not call people names when you have no idea what you are talking about.

  • @kevyoung980 You are a retard. This system is built by Lockheed Martin which bought Vought who design it here in the USA. Israel has them along with several other countries but they did not design the MLRS or the HIMARS.  The GLMRS rounds are gps guided and also build by Lockheed Martin. Please do not call people names when you have no idea what you are talking about. I work for Lockheed and worked on this system while I was in the Army.

  • i would like to purchase one of these, what retailer sells them?

  • @dotcombatgames Russia... always :)

  • @TheDearLeaderEd wrong.

  • @TheDearLeaderEd nope,the chinese did years afters the invention of the gunpowder. please learn something before writing such shit

  • well GMLRS is  a bad name any guided rocket is a missile so it's GMLMS not GMLRS

  • The MLRS or M270A1 are bad ass and they are really accurate. So who ever make comments about them without know shit shut the fuck up. And by the way they can shoot rockets and guided missiles. 

  • Another American weapons system finding itself in the hands of it's allies

  • britain payed good money for, so are allowed to use it at will with out the pemittion of the origional country. also if your complaining remember who made the tank. and what is the main vehicle base of this, a tank.

  • Yea just like a Brit to find that insulting dumbass, and the MLRS's real improvments come in missil technology which, in the Western world you can thank the United States and Germany for.

  • if america didnt want britain using anything, they wouldnt be using it. You are at our mercy. MWUHAHAHAHA

    jk man. Brittain is foggy though.

  • is that gps guided or heat seeking

  • tell ur self a question:

    is heat seeking good in a hot country when u maybe need a strike on some "trenches" or equal, or is it better to use gps ?

    :-)

  • A - Aircraft are about 50 times more expensive, and need to be refueled. Also, they are only useable for a few minutes, once they have dropped their bombs, thats it. An MLRS is so much easier to maintain and resupply, and it gives troops on the battlefield acess to lots of heavy firepower when its needed, not when the aircraft get there, or if.

  • Yes, they are probably over 50 times more expensive. But again, I'd be more worried about my infantry than money (after all, we're spending money left on right anyway on crap like banks and whatnot). Besides, we already have planes. Creating new planes wastes money, not using current supplies.

    Furthermore, same with MLRSes; you must refuel them (they run on gas too, believe it or not), and once their rockets run out, they're useless. And they can't retreat as fast as a plane.

  • Maybe you'd like to get rid of artillery all together?

  • i am from a mlrs battery in the british army they run on diesel and are never going to be over run by taliban as they are so far back and they can be ready again after firing all 12 rockets in 25-30mins

  • And this is why I love artillery.

  • cant retreat as fast as a plane: last time i checked you dont win wars by retreating every two minutes. ------------ fuel: they dont take as much fuel and can be refueled faster --------- rearmed: as well they can be rearmed much faster aswell --------------- range: at 70km they can easily be stationed in a few places to hit their targets. ------------- i think that its a tad better than a plane but an aircraft will boost moral anyday.

  • Artillery is far from useless. It is the exact opposite of useless. You are useless. Please, just /end your life.

  • Oh, artillery accounted for 70% of the deaths in WW2. Sup raped faggot?

  • @Tigerf0x Very true and also MLRS is not flying into combat and cant get shot down im trying to get MLRS for my MOS right now i find out monday if i can

  • @Tigerf0x Ain't aircraft preciser and can go deeper into enemy territory than a MLRS.

    If the price were 1:1, I bet people would go for aircraft .

  • Most aircraft only have a track and record feature throw their (IR) targeting pod. Second, there has been a unitary MLRS warhead since at least 2002.

  • the wonders of nature

  • That's quite the backblast!

  • True but most of it is just dust lol

  • Are they controlling the MRLS rockets with a UAV drone or something?

  • At 1:45 what were they hitting?

    Missed the vehicle.

    Why not show the results afterwards?

  • Missed the vehicle? It impacted a few metres away...it would have been completely obliterated.

  • 5/5** for that beauty.

  • thats not kicking ass its fucking scaring.

    hell yeah, nice video

  • Lol that bird was like "fuck this, im gettin out of here"

  • The russians are ahead in this...

  • its most likely GMLRS they have it down to pinpoint now. G= guided i believe

  • MLRS is the shit. I did that in the US army for a few years stationed in 6/37FA in camp casey south korea. and yes GMLRS is Guided Multiple Launch Rocket Systems....meaning the rockets are aided with GPS. Very accurate and deadly

  • Well i do believe at sun down an MLRS could launch in day and hit the target to the east at night, but its midday in the launch. Im wondering if the aerial video is from a spooky and its guns. I figured MLRS would fuck up way more shit than that did. Not that nothing was fucked up just the accuracy seems too perfect for the MLRSs big ass missles =) I could be wrong

  • They are not big ass...but 122mm I believe...

    tank shells are 155mm and smaller 125mm. Russian Smerch is 300mm and atacms are somewhere there. I mean quite deadlier! I really like the US mlrs 270 or 280 with ataxms missile capabbilies with 950 explosive bomblets

  • Give us the tools......

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more