Ironic to see an aircraft that hit's over 16,000 mph when it enters the earths atmosphere to be strapped on the back of an aircraft that can't even break the sound barrier... Great video!
I think both American and PAN am. Because at that time for testing, they use American Airlines Stripes. Very old plane, not used that much and often, so the frame of the plane still very strong.
most likely it is a 747-100, as thats what american airlines used...
the two NASA 747's were originally operated by American Airlines...back when they had 747's in their fleet. They retired the "jumbo jet" back in the early 80's.
imagine if the 747 fail and every one climbed into the spce shuttle and got saved and the 747 crashed!!!! they would be the luckiest person on the planet!!!!!
I actually got to see the carrier with the shuttle flying over my house a few years ago! It took me a few minutes to figure out just what it was. At first I thought it was some kind of private jet with an extra-large tail fin.
It's a good way to transport it back to it's primary launch area, in Florida. The space shuttle cannot fly under it's own power. There are places all over the world certified to accept space shuttle landings, and there is only one place for it to land. They land in Florida right next to the launch area most of the time, but the shuttle lands semi-frequently at Edwards AFB (shown here) and has even landed in New mexico.
I imagine the shuttle must be positioned carefully, lest it rip off (nose up) or counteract the lift of the Boeing's wings (nose down). I have a hard time imagining that it aids in performance.
lol. thats fucking hilarious pilot7893! why do u have so many thumbs down dude? I guess its nothing geeks who watch these kinda vids. Im gonna go ahead and give u another thumbs down cuz i like to go with the flow. sorry dude.
There was a realistic pc simulation that runs on DOS called SHUTTLE. Ahead of its time, underrated and remained one of the best & innovative flight/space sims ever despite that it was underplayed. Huge potential for a revival to spark interest now that we have better graphics tech. It even had a simulated landing after piggy back on 747.
Hmm! Drag coefficient of a tumbleweed? Is this an intentional "angle of incidence" to afford some lift?....interesting, I've not noticed that before. Fire wall the throttle boys!!
My question is on wht the shuttle was attached to the 747 tht the winds never has effects on it?and moreover has NASA ever tried this tech b4 or was it just an experiments tht comes to function excellently?.Thnx for the video anyways.
Too bad the space shuttle was a sort of technological dead-end. There are a lot of reasons we are going back to capsules on rockets - it is MUCH safer, it actually costs less per launch than the "reusable" shuttle and with modern computers, launching people and payloads seperately and docking them in space is quite easy.
It wasn't necessary to be that snooty ... the Constellation/Orion/Ares rocket system (the new Mars program on the drawing board) will be exactly as geocam2 described.
To refuel - because the shuttle is so heavy if they put enough fuel to reach it's destination then it would be over the MTOW (Maximum Take-Off Weight) so they put a smaller amount of fuel, then re-fuel again along the way.
Not sure for this mission, but sometimes a thunderstorm is in the way. The shuttle's tiles can be knocked loose by high velocity water droplets ... so they wait out the weather on the ground at another location closer to "home" in Florida. I know they sometimes stop at Columbus AFB in Mississippi.
Just some trivia: The pilot of the SCA is C. Gordon Fullerton. He was pilot during the landing practices with Enterprise in 1977 along with Fred Haise as CDR (the other Enterprise crew was Joe Engle and Dick Truly who later crewed STS-2), PLT on STS-3 and CDR of STS-51F.
The orbiter is lifted up by a device known as the Mate/De-mate-device (MDD), the Shuttle Carrier Aircraft (SCA) taxis underneath it, and the orbiter is lowered and attached to the struts you see in the picture. The attachment points on the orbiter are the same the External Tank uses while the orbiter is attached to it before/during launch.
Great show! I now get to see up close what my family and I witnessed from just accross the lake bed. We camped all night(two nights)on the far side and made a video of the pair flying over us. Check the vintagemachines channel to veiw, if you would like another angle. VM
amazing it can fly in that configuration. It goes to show that when you feel a little turbulence on a commercial flight, it is only a fraction of the stresses a plane can handle
i was stationed at edwards during my years in the air force. loved it and the mojave desert. i was station at the 6510 usaf hospital, so i woke up seeing the entire flightline, dry lakes, et al every day.
in addition to the fantastic sight of seeing the shuttle, the vista in your vid was just spectacular. again thanks.
May the Stars ans Stripes always fly beyond the bounds of Earth.....now and forever!
ArcticStarFox 10 months ago
Ironic to see an aircraft that hit's over 16,000 mph when it enters the earths atmosphere to be strapped on the back of an aircraft that can't even break the sound barrier... Great video!
145Slap789 11 months ago
shuttle = costly POS
ww2footage 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ww2footage So why are you here?
txfirehawk 1 year ago
need very long runway for takeoff
aircharts 2 years ago
i wonder how much of the shuttles dynamics effects how the aircraft flies, and does you shuttles controls surfaces move at all to assits the 747???
samgibz 2 years ago
Absolutely NONE!!! The shuttle is setup to fly straight not up or down - the 747 DOES NOT need nor want any help!!!
Earthlinked 2 years ago
nor would the surfaces be in the correct positions
djchestfire 2 years ago
whoa thats a heavy load to carry, lots of pressure on plane and pilot!
Blackaceftw 2 years ago
I think both American and PAN am. Because at that time for testing, they use American Airlines Stripes. Very old plane, not used that much and often, so the frame of the plane still very strong.
eal1011 3 years ago
I guess they'll be doing this again pretty soon here after landing at Edwards today.
CaptainXanax 3 years ago
most likely it is a 747-100, as thats what american airlines used...
the two NASA 747's were originally operated by American Airlines...back when they had 747's in their fleet. They retired the "jumbo jet" back in the early 80's.
mbenzsl2000 3 years ago
imagine if the 747 fail and every one climbed into the spce shuttle and got saved and the 747 crashed!!!! they would be the luckiest person on the planet!!!!!
chevyman5436 3 years ago
47???
rtenewsontwo 3 years ago
impossible.
tdotjonc 3 years ago
sorry that was in reference to chevyman5436
tdotjonc 3 years ago
it was just a joke
chevyman5436 3 years ago
Give it a few months until someone from Hollywood reads that and you might just be getting a knock on your door :-P.
pleasuretrip 3 years ago
lol
chevyman5436 3 years ago
i always watch these huge planes take off that way thousands of pounds and just think how is that possible...
inmudvayneflames 3 years ago
I actually got to see the carrier with the shuttle flying over my house a few years ago! It took me a few minutes to figure out just what it was. At first I thought it was some kind of private jet with an extra-large tail fin.
NarrowGaugeGuy 3 years ago
Nice Video, unbelievable how long it takes from VR to lift off......
tediek 3 years ago
Wow, thats amazing how it stays completely still, even though it probably weighs over a million pounds... That's engenuity for ya.
TexasSlide 3 years ago
why is it on the back?
Raaaaatib93 3 years ago
It's a good way to transport it back to it's primary launch area, in Florida. The space shuttle cannot fly under it's own power. There are places all over the world certified to accept space shuttle landings, and there is only one place for it to land. They land in Florida right next to the launch area most of the time, but the shuttle lands semi-frequently at Edwards AFB (shown here) and has even landed in New mexico.
b1cc2 3 years ago
there mating!
jonny4romania 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
They're taking it to Russia
carnage123123123 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I expect this one flies better because it's got 2 sets of wings
pilot7893 3 years ago
And what exactly is that implying?
macfan9000 3 years ago
More wings means more lift
pilot7893 3 years ago
Well no kidding, but what do you mean " This one flies better..." ?
macfan9000 3 years ago
I imagine the shuttle must be positioned carefully, lest it rip off (nose up) or counteract the lift of the Boeing's wings (nose down). I have a hard time imagining that it aids in performance.
pf126p 3 years ago
lol. thats fucking hilarious pilot7893! why do u have so many thumbs down dude? I guess its nothing geeks who watch these kinda vids. Im gonna go ahead and give u another thumbs down cuz i like to go with the flow. sorry dude.
mbrutus5 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
they're taking it to Russia
carnage123123123 4 years ago
Why Russia? They always take it back to kennedy space center if they don't already land there.
macfan9000 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
they're taking it to Russia
carnage123123123 4 years ago
Wow...loved that 1 degree per second rotation...
navmanaged 4 years ago
is this a 747-2 or 747-3?
GOJETCRJPILOT 4 years ago
747-300
hlheavyd 3 years ago
No its either a 100 or 200, i think 100, plus i've sat in the cockpit of that one and it aint no 300
driverblue1 3 years ago
3 days of silence....Let's all praise someone
Yviron 4 years ago
moron
neilzep 4 years ago
this is when I am proud to be American.
neilzep 4 years ago
sorry to burst your bubble... Most of the engineers working on this puppy didn't go to high school in America. Thats a good thing.
mehdiAbderezai 4 years ago
quiet arab,no one cares what you think.
neilzep 4 years ago
Haha, I am actually Irish American. You too must have gone to a high school in America.
mehdiAbderezai 4 years ago 2
liar
neilzep 4 years ago
???
neilzep. so by your name I should assume that you are an idiot (a safe assumption) or that your from another planet.
mehdiAbderezai 4 years ago
dork
neilzep 4 years ago
are you really 41?
mehdiAbderezai 4 years ago
allah akbar
neilzep 4 years ago
true that
mehdiAbderezai 4 years ago
There was a realistic pc simulation that runs on DOS called SHUTTLE. Ahead of its time, underrated and remained one of the best & innovative flight/space sims ever despite that it was underplayed. Huge potential for a revival to spark interest now that we have better graphics tech. It even had a simulated landing after piggy back on 747.
flying8speedistra 4 years ago 2
it was a lesson: like a mother shows his child how to walk or something like that. great ride
CaptainMontana1123 4 years ago
The most awesome piggy-back ride ever!
Bokbebliksem 4 years ago 3
like a bird family
mother shows child how to fly
xd
thx4up :)
redryder89 4 years ago 5
Hey dads could too...well they could lol.
lostinseganet 4 years ago
Hmm! Drag coefficient of a tumbleweed? Is this an intentional "angle of incidence" to afford some lift?....interesting, I've not noticed that before. Fire wall the throttle boys!!
synthpilot 4 years ago
My question is on wht the shuttle was attached to the 747 tht the winds never has effects on it?and moreover has NASA ever tried this tech b4 or was it just an experiments tht comes to function excellently?.Thnx for the video anyways.
gvicman 4 years ago
The first place you see is Edwards Air Force Base in Mojave, California. I been there a couple times, very neat place.
Fidokrab 4 years ago
Too bad the space shuttle was a sort of technological dead-end. There are a lot of reasons we are going back to capsules on rockets - it is MUCH safer, it actually costs less per launch than the "reusable" shuttle and with modern computers, launching people and payloads seperately and docking them in space is quite easy.
geocam2 4 years ago
If it's so easy, then do it. Go work for NASA and set them straight. Until then, sit back and let the big boys handle it.
OAXM202 4 years ago
It wasn't necessary to be that snooty ... the Constellation/Orion/Ares rocket system (the new Mars program on the drawing board) will be exactly as geocam2 described.
(See October 2007 Scientific American)
lenarends 4 years ago 3
thats cool i wonder why they can't go all the way to florida why did they have to make a stop along the way.
bstep13 4 years ago
To refuel - because the shuttle is so heavy if they put enough fuel to reach it's destination then it would be over the MTOW (Maximum Take-Off Weight) so they put a smaller amount of fuel, then re-fuel again along the way.
webologist 4 years ago
Not sure for this mission, but sometimes a thunderstorm is in the way. The shuttle's tiles can be knocked loose by high velocity water droplets ... so they wait out the weather on the ground at another location closer to "home" in Florida. I know they sometimes stop at Columbus AFB in Mississippi.
lenarends 4 years ago
this remind me of a baby whale swiming with it's mother
jamaq 4 years ago
Just some trivia: The pilot of the SCA is C. Gordon Fullerton. He was pilot during the landing practices with Enterprise in 1977 along with Fred Haise as CDR (the other Enterprise crew was Joe Engle and Dick Truly who later crewed STS-2), PLT on STS-3 and CDR of STS-51F.
kimmern123 4 years ago
How do they get the shuttle on top of the 747? especially without damaging it?
emjaykanfa 4 years ago
The orbiter is lifted up by a device known as the Mate/De-mate-device (MDD), the Shuttle Carrier Aircraft (SCA) taxis underneath it, and the orbiter is lowered and attached to the struts you see in the picture. The attachment points on the orbiter are the same the External Tank uses while the orbiter is attached to it before/during launch.
kimmern123 4 years ago
Have u got Atlantis Space Shuttle is landing with 747 ?
aalexxanderr 4 years ago
Great show! I now get to see up close what my family and I witnessed from just accross the lake bed. We camped all night(two nights)on the far side and made a video of the pair flying over us. Check the vintagemachines channel to veiw, if you would like another angle. VM
vintagemachines 4 years ago
amazing it can fly in that configuration. It goes to show that when you feel a little turbulence on a commercial flight, it is only a fraction of the stresses a plane can handle
Cohengenuity 4 years ago
Awesome sight. That's something I'd love to see in person. Thanks
Mainyard48 4 years ago
thanks for this video.
i was stationed at edwards during my years in the air force. loved it and the mojave desert. i was station at the 6510 usaf hospital, so i woke up seeing the entire flightline, dry lakes, et al every day.
in addition to the fantastic sight of seeing the shuttle, the vista in your vid was just spectacular. again thanks.
wntoply6 4 years ago