Added: 4 years ago
From: zeropopulationgrowth
Views: 5,532
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (85)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Fresh water will never be a problem

    Global warming is BS

    She is not a scientist and has proven she is not all that smart.

  • what disgusting video, channel name and message. Would your ideology permit more people to live say if there were to be an energy revolution, where one could burn cheap rock that covers this world and the other worlds, say it were a NON RADIOACTIVE NUCLEAR REACTOR the size of a dish washer? Self regulating and CANNOT go critical & explode EVER. Say this "free" rock fuel abundant on earth could sustain us the next 600 years (on present consumption) and permit 20 billion population limit.

  • what disgusting video, channel name and message. Would your ideology permit more people to live say if there were to be an energy revolution, where one could burn cheap rock that covers this world and the other worlds, say it were a NON RADIOACTIVE NUCLEAR REACTOR the size of a dish washer? Self regulating and CANNOT go critical & explode EVER. Say this "free" rock fuel abundant on earth could sustain us the next 600 years (on present consumption) and permit 20 billion population limit.

  • Read "The Bell Curve," "Race, Evolution, and Behavior," or "Why Race Matters," VHEMT is omitting facts and only promoting "voluntary human extinction" in White(high IQ) populations.White (European-derived) people (8% of human population) are already experiencing population decline of 40% every generation and experiencing massive non-white immigration and massive non-white birth rates. The races of man are not equal.They differ in average intelligence among other things.

  • Read "The Bell Curve," "Race, Evolution, and Behavior," or "Why Race Matters," VHEMT is omitting facts and only promoting "voluntary human extinction" in White(high IQ) populations.White (European-derived) people (8% of human population) are already experiencing population decline of 40% every generation and experiencing massive non-white immigration and massive non-white birth rates. The races of man are not equal.They differ in average intelligence among other things.

  • White (European-derived) people (8% of human population) are already experiencing population decline of 40% every generation and experiencing massive non-white immigration and massive non-white birth rates. The races of man are not equal.They differ in average intelligence among other things.Read "The Bell Curve," "Race, Evolution, and Behavior," or "Why Race Matters," VHEMT is omitting facts and only promoting "voluntary human extinction" in White(high IQ) populations.

  • White (European-derived) people (8% of human population) are already experiencing population decline of 40% every generation and experiencing massive non-white immigration and massive non-white birth rates. The races of man are not equal.They differ in average intelligence among other things.Read "The Bell Curve," "Race, Evolution, and Behavior," or "Why Race Matters," VHEMT is omitting facts and only promoting "voluntary human extinction" in White(high IQ) populations.

  • White (European-derived) people (8% of human population) are already experiencing population decline of 40% every generation and experiencing massive non-white immigration and massive non-white birth rates. The races of man are not equal.They differ in average intelligence among other things.Read "The Bell Curve," "Race, Evolution, and Behavior," or "Why Race Matters," VHEMT is omitting facts and only promoting "voluntary human extinction" in White(high IQ) populations.

  • White (European-derived) people (8% of human population) are already experiencing population decline of 40% every generation and experiencing massive non-white immigration and massive non-white birth rates. The races of man are not equal.They differ in average intelligence among other things.Read "The Bell Curve," "Race, Evolution, and Behavior," or "Why Race Matters," VHEMT is omitting facts and only promoting "voluntary human extinction" in White(high IQ) populations.

  • White (European-derived) people (8% of human population) are already experiencing population decline of 40% every generation and experiencing massive non-white immigration and massive non-white birth rates. The races of man are not equal.They differ in average intelligence among other things.Read "The Bell Curve," "Race, Evolution, and Behavior," or "Why Race Matters," VHEMT is omitting facts and only promoting "voluntary human extinction" in White(high IQ) populations.

  • White (European-derived) people (8% of human population) are already experiencing population decline of 40% every generation and experiencing massive non-white immigration and massive non-white birth rates. The races of man are not equal.They differ in average intelligence among other things.Read "The Bell Curve," "Race, Evolution, and Behavior," or "Why Race Matters," VHEMT is omitting facts and only promoting "voluntary human extinction" in White(high IQ) populations.

  • Whites should procreate.White (European-derived) people (8% of human population) are already experiencing population decline of 40% every generation and experiencing massive non-white immigration and massive non-white birth rates. The races of man are not equal.They differ in average intelligence among other things.Read "The Bell Curve," "Race, Evolution, and Behavior," or "Why Race Matters," VHEMT is omitting facts and only promoting "voluntary human extinction" in White(high IQ) populations.

  • Whites should procreate.White (European-derived) people (8% of human population) are already experiencing population decline of 40% every generation and experiencing massive non-white immigration and massive non-white birth rates. The races of man are not equal.They differ in average intelligence among other things.Read "The Bell Curve," "Race, Evolution, and Behavior," or "Why Race Matters," VHEMT is omitting facts and only promoting "voluntary human extinction" in White (high IQ) populations.

  • Great message... I guess it's been half-heard. In terms of restoring funding to family planning programmes overseas, this current administration's done better than the last one. In terms of addressing overpopulation within the USA itself by reducing the massive immigration that drives it, there's been no change. It seems your pro-growth lobby's just too powerful... and we unfortunately have the same problem in Australia.

  • I think the producers of this video have confused overpopulation with poor infrastructure. Fix and expand the infrastructure (as we always have in the past) and the so called overpopulation is not a problem. See that uninhabited land behind you?

  • @tyates817

    Overpopulation is not about running out of land. It's about running out of resources. I can't facepalm hard enough when someone seriously thinks it's about running out of land.

    There is already talk about within the next few decades running out of oil, fissile uranium, fertile soil, water, and even basic ELEMENTS. Gallium, germanium, hafnium, indium and several other elemental resources will be completely exhausted before the next decade.

  • hell yeah zero pop growth! Overpopulation is the root cause of most of our problems.

  • start at 30, stop at 2

  • It's becoming more clear. Denialists are not waking up. It appears to be genetically ingrained. Catastrophe is inevitable. The science minded, the prepared will survive. Natures next round of natural selection is coming.

  • Z.P.G. begins with you. Do something positive to bring down the number of people. You have the power to unburden the Earth of 1 person today! You have the means to end your life cycle for the good of Mother Earth.

  • Gaia Liberation Front?

    CHURCH OF EUTHANASIA?

  • You tell them Daisy!

  • Almost 7 billion now.

  • The government in america will never attempt to curb or curtail the population here...what have we left here to produce but more tax paying consumers. A giant fleshy sea of sweet and fertile revenue generating meglomaniacs suckeling from the sweet wet illusurory tit of capitalism.

  • you solved your own problem: more people = more wars = less people.

    see? it works out in the end. just go with the flow.

  • Entire world population could each be given 2 acres in Australia.

    Every man woman and child now living on the planet could live on one continent and there would still be 1/3rd of Australia's land mass uninhabited, along with no one living on the other 6 continents.

    Statements made to imply the world is overpopulated are lies or ignorance.

    Corruption is mental kryptonite. Make the penalty for politicians and officials who murder the truth, equal to the crime.

  • Speaking of ignorance - Australia is mostly uninhabitable desert and non-productive arid lands and already suffers from significant periods of drought - water shortages. This is typical of the over population denial campaigns - not a clue about energy, food, water and the global limitations of those resources. Leave it to these guys and it will be standing room only - at least to the food runs out.

  • No, they could each be given 0.27 acres per person.

    Just because the worlds population could fit inside some arbitrary area proves what?

  • i watched and read again with another critical eye, and the only thing i found faulty or inaccurate is "beautiful mountains", more like nice looking hills?

    I'm just showing off some of my colorado background... The Appalachians are a pretty piss poor excuse for mountains, but certainly worth keeping people out! (like that will ever be an overpopulated area - chuckle chuckle)

  • great message/question

    LESS PEOPLE FOR A BETTER PLANET

  • this is such an important issue that gets sooo little attention. people should have no more than one biological child. im the 2nd child in my family and im not having any biological children.

  • heil! hitler! as you have forseen my master they are even willing to sterilize themselves and others.

  • thanks for having the courage to bring up the issue.

    Most people won't address the issue.

  • She should go join the National Socialist German Workers Party. They would embrace her with open arms!

  • ignorant comment. overpopulation isn't limited by parties. we all have to deal with it. just depends on how. some want wars, some want to avoid it. may you personally die in war.

  • You know, if you look up that party, they do not support the type of genocidal dictatorship to which you are attempting to allude. In fact, they seem to have some pretty good, strong socialist ideals.

  • How many kids do you have or plan on having? The problem I see it is everyone is willing to point a finger at someone else who should sacrifice besides them. I have no kids. I'm an environmentalist who is not a hypocrite.

  • I'm pretty sure it says in the video tag-- oh, yep, right there---that I'm deliberately childless. Every human within walking distance of a doctor should be sterilized, with or without their consent, because their genetic copies are destroying the environment, regardless of their poverty level. After that we can talk about sustainable population.

  • I hope you stay that way, I know many who fell victim to baby rabies in their later 30's and now talk about nothing else but their worthless offspring! I'm 45 and sterile.

  • Oh no; we won't be having kids! If we ever get the urge to have no free time or money we might adopt but we both find pregnancy and childbirth revolting. There's a reason they invented "vaginal rejuvenation" surgery and I don't want any part of it..lol!

  • you can cram the entire worlds population into the state of Taxas and still get the population density of central London? This planet can sustain 20 billion people if the elite who want population control & brainwashed your ilk only allow us to use this technology that worked evreyday from 1964-69 by the flick of a button. Thorium Flouride Reactor baby! One cubic meter of rock contains 10-12 grams throium & 200 gram is enough for an individuals lifetime of electricity use in the US

  • Our extinction would be the easiest solution, yet the most single-minded. I respect your opinion. We can feel guilty that we made the world what it is now: Screwed, but the only reason is our situation: Hunger. We, in Denmark - and like so many other western countries - has seen a big decrease in our rate of population increase. We've actually decreased in popularity here in Europe. My guess is our success. In Africa, one of the most simple solution of gathering food is just more "labour".

  • Sorry, had to keep it so compressed as possible. The message's capacity limit didn't really help.

  • (Continued): African and Asian countries has an increased population. And mostly you see families with at least four kids. It has been proven that poor families raises more kids than wealthy families. If we gave a little of our resources to those in need, it would all change. But no one cares about being paragon anymore. That's our biggest problem; we usually won't help unless it affects us somehow.

  • To Ventasmentos

    Why has there been so much poor if any effort, to try to understand why poor people have so many children? They say of poor people, that children are their only wealth

    "Developing countries should be more like us and modernize, to better support their burgeoning populations. We should be more like them, and have more children." Pronatalist

    Poor people also can't afford the shoddy Big Pharma contraceptive potions and poisons. Big families were traditionally considered blessings

  • typing is no cheaper.

    you cant say that teenagers and anyone who has moved countries recently are breeding anymore "irresponsibly" than anyone else either

  • lol..the point is the Progress energy factory in the background to the left and, to people from the Asheville area this particular view from the Blue ridge parkway used to show alomost no housing. it's hard to see in this video, but in person now you see huge, multi-thousand home developments now. My tits being so focal in this can be attributed to my husband's choice of framing and telling me how and where to stand...lol.

  • People who have more than 2 children per family are selfish, THE PLAGUE OF HUMANS will get worse, rich people will eat poor people and insects cause animals will not exist, and you can blame religious and greedy people, but the planet will rebuild after humans are gone.

  • I support everything you said in this video. But why haven't you considered adoption? Its a harsh sacrifice to be childless when other have multiple kids. I think we should at least support and sustaine the people who are living on this earth while we can work on the solutions to prevent over-population.

  • Thanks for the comment! Adoption is a possibility far down the road; we will adopt older, hard to place kids if/when we do. Listen to some of Thom Hartman's archives on this topic; besides antibiotics/sterile method, the next biggest reason population exploded 100 years ago was fossil fuels.

  • I am in favour of population control.

    The US should start us in the right direction with a 25% cull!

    Criminal record? Bang.

    Crack pipe or Bong? Bang.

    SUV owner? Bang.

    Mormon? Bang...Bang.

    Funny how it's always those OTHER people in the world who have to control THEIR populations so the yanks can rape the planet some more, innit?

  • Hi. I, too support population control, but in a vehemently non-kill kind of way, and I would like to ask you to phrase this in a more polite way, at least. You are the type of bigoted (I mean, Mormons? Huh?), pro-death-rate-increase loudmouth who gets the entire movement shoved aside. This is not to say that you may not hold or express your opinion on the matter, but simply to ask you to do so in less visceral, rude, and ignorant terms.

    Thank you.

  • leaning libertarian my ass!

  • I think the human population can be paralleled with a high school yeast experiment. The one where you add a couple grains of yeast to sugar water, and they grow and prosper until their population chokes themselves to death on their own waste products. That is what humanity has to look forward to. In my eyes, the sooner, the better.

  • The Environment is important, but let's not have it fall into the hands of control freaks who want to play god and also cull us at the same time.

  • No one is suggesting culling anything but additional humans through family planning. All I personally want is to stop human sperm from fertalizing human eggs unless both humans involved specifically intend for that particular sexual act to result in an additional human. Regardless of religion or nationality it's been proven women restrict their family size based on their economics when they're given the contraceptive tools to do so.

  • And the education. Educated women see that they can have a meaningful life without being a bood mare.

  • We like to fool ourselves to spare the dread, but from what I have researched we kill more people today in the world then the wars of the Ancients could ever do. This could be because we have more people on Earth but most universities are pumping out population controllers and dehumanizing us into statistics. Humans are more than ever split into dividing camps and the new god is money and power.

  • Hi. In my experience, university life prepares people to see themselves as more intelligent than average (sometimes rightly so) and to breed and produce more of the perceived "good stock" to combat the "ignorant masses." This does not seem as if it encourages, much less "pumps out" population control advocates. Keep in mind that many things other than education can have the same effect, and that this is not meant to disparage universities.

  • War and genocide have occurred for thousands of years for various reasons for goodness sake. As for reduction in water resources then blame coca-cola, check out what US corporations do in third world countries. And for choosing to be childless, well, you truely deserve the US Presidential Medal of Freedom for that.

  • She's being the positive one making a change...all you are doing is criticizing the minority that do try to involve themselves in society's messes.

  • What exactly is she doing to clean up society's mess? She's not having kids because she's obviously not maternal, saving the planet is just a (lousy) excuse. Watch a video called "Mark Steyn on eco-abortions" on youtube.

  • "Eco-abortions"; another bit of supply side rhetoric, of COURSE, brought to us by the Rupert Murdoch propaganda machine. Fox news channel is designed to keep Americans pregnant and shopping at Wal-mart for jesus. That piece was clearly meant to appeal to the kind of breeders brilliantly spoofed in "The Ballad of Ricky Bobby".

  • I agree with some of what you said (on Murdoch) although I haven't seen that movie. However the western mindset and mass media is generally anti-child hence the very low bithrates. I think eventually every western country will resemble Latin America, Africa and the middle east as low european birthrates and mass immigration transform all western nations.

  • This video is so hypocritical I don't even know where to begin!!!

  • I agree that overpopulation places a strain on natural resources, but how can you be a libertarian and advocate government sponsored population control? also, the US already has a low rate of population growth, much of the increase is due to immigration.

  • A democrtic leaning libertarian, mostly about social issues; I'd like to see more controls on the market then what we currently have. Overpopulation is absolutely a worldwide issue but America should follow the Asian lead of social and economic stigma for those that choose to pollute the Earth with too much of their own DNA.

  • I wish there were more childfree athiests like you (and me) willing to openly discuss their beliefs like you have done here. It's too bad we're such a tiny minority. :-( BTW, I have driven on I-40 many times (btwn TN and NC), and I must say that Asheville is one of the most breathtakingly beautiful places I have ever seen!

  • if everyone stuck to having no more than 2 children for the next 50 years we would see an enormous rise in the quality of our environments. However this must be in combination with an increase in the use of renewable sources of resources and energy plus a drop in the use of non-renewable and unsustainable sources. I'm certainly all for it.

  • whether or not that question is offensive depends on how you interpret it...

  • Why should the President have any anti-freedom interest in imposed unpopular human population "control?" If the population expands, the corporations like the bigger profits and sales that could bring. The government gets a larger base of taxpayers.

    And if the U.S. really is "the home of the free and brave," as one of our patriotic songs claims, then how can we possibly be scared of a little natural human population growth?

  • That is PRECISELY the point; religions are mere puppets of the corporations who want an ever expanding consumer base. The natural inclination of free, equal people with anhigh quality of life is to stop breeding: look at Western Europe, Japan, etc...

  • The corporations are also paying starlets like Nicole Richie to make spawning fashionable again here in the US and it's working. Russia is paying people with SUV's to breed (see Conception Day). Corporations don't like the fact that free, educated people choose Epicureanism instead of the biological drudgery of procreation.

  • More people does indeed mean more taxes can be collected by the govt but they also have to be shared round MORE people so your logic is flawed. You are forgetting about the law of diminishing returns too. The U.S. is overpopulated and will remain so as long as the average persons way of life is unsustainable.

  • sorry that was aimed at "pronatalist" not "zeropopulationgrowth"

  • Maybe you should do something about it rather than president? Just by looking at you I see that you are consuming a lot of natural resources. Go, tell your mother that she made a mistake by letting you be born. She is the one that contributed to it.And if you think there are too many people, think about someone suggesting that you are one too many.

  • Over the past 100 years 5 out of every six humans born have been "too many". No one is suggesting anything needs to be done with the humans now alive, but everyone needs to stop creating additional humans.

  • What a rude and immature comment. Just because you don't agree with her beliefs does not give you the right to insult her. Grow up already! Oh, and please do us all a favor don't breed.

  • See now, that is sentimental rather than scientific. There is no question that if we continue like this the human race is done for. If I never existed, it would be no skin off my nose because I would not know anything about it. We are talking about future pro creation and the now. Stopping this problem now. That whole "how would you feel" card does not apply. I am here, now let's deal with the issue at hand.

  • How about we just quit sending ALL foreign aid and let these other countries deal with their own problems.

  • That would actually help them - sending them food and medicine just makes them breed, which in turn causes more hunger, wars, ecological devastation...

  • 1900: 1.6 billion

    2007: 6.6 billion

    2010: ??????

    Goal: 500 million

  • Damn !!! look at those mountains !!! WOW !

  • I am pro-life but i agree the world is over populated. So here is how we solve this problem. Anyone who is a convicted sex offender, murderer, or felon of any kind (this to include illegal aliens) needs to be sent in for immediate castration. Not only would this reduce the population but it would also reduce the spawning of more bad genes. However I am not for abortion. Castrate Criminals!

  • "Pro-life is more consistantly pro-life, when it is also pro-population." Pronatalist

    The pro-life, sanctity of life message, does absolutely nothing to help keep "burgeoning" human population growth more "in check." Therefore, it's prudent that at least some prolifers such as I, proclaim how and why naturally enlarging the entire human race, really is in the best interests of the populous many.

    There's lots of room for lots more people, most everywhere one would care to look.

  • You are suggesting that criminality is genetic. As yet there is no clear evidence for this.

  • For every kid you don't have, an Indian woman will have three. The greatest population growth is in third-world countries, and there's little that an American president can do about that.

  • Not true; since the republicans took over American aid no longer goes to overseas groups that do things like distribute condoms and perform abortions. Earned income credit could be phased out, discouraging breeding. Immigrants could be encouraged in various ways to not breed.

    Besides all that, just working for women's rights in other countries and supporting their right to family planning (which they do not have in muslim homes) always reduces the number of children per woman.

  • 38DD?

  • I'm sayin... but, excellent question. ;-)

  • how do you solve that? do you have children?

  • no; we chose not to have children and advocate for population reduction

  • FINALLY!!! Someone who isn't blinded enough to see that overpopulation is the root of all problems. I hope your question gets posted on the debates. I mean seriously: war, murder, energy, and the eco-system they all stem from one problem....Overpopulation

  • maybe if we sprinkled some truffles on the statistics and got them some french boars......

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more