I don't know why this video was uploaded. The title makes it sound like Hovind has no idea what he's talking about. But the guy who calls in and questions Hovind is refuted. From this we know that radio carbon dating cannot be trusted, and evolutionists will come up with lots of excuses if the dates don't fit their pre-conceived ideas.
I like how Kent likes to use the idea that if any science is ever wrong, then all science is wrong. What's funny, is that the scientific method is a process that finds flaws and corrects for them, eliminating this type of concern.
However, it is exactly the argument that can be used against blind faith religions. Since there is no justification for the correctness of a
deity-inspired scripture, and some of these writings are obviously wrong, how do we know the others are right?
I don't know why this video was uploaded. The title makes it sound like Hovind has no idea what he's talking about. But the guy who calls in and questions Hovind is refuted. From this we know that radio carbon dating cannot be trusted, and evolutionists will come up with lots of excuses if the dates don't fit their pre-conceived ideas.
Slaves4Christ2 19 hours ago
Hey, that's me on the Infidelguy Show!!! Thank you Trin80ty for putting my voice together with Kent's "facts"!
ScientiaPerceptum 1 week ago
C14 isn't used to date fully fossilized remains, because the carbon that was in them has been replaced through mineralization.
The sad thing is that for many creatards, this Hovind nonsense is all they'll ever hear about "science.
Pathetic.
ndrthrdr1 4 months ago
Looking up articales that show when C14 doesn't work is not proof it does not work well when it is used correctly.
And it is not used to date fossils. It is used to date Egyptian things at sites 6000 years old and some older.
gregrutz 4 months ago
I like how Kent likes to use the idea that if any science is ever wrong, then all science is wrong. What's funny, is that the scientific method is a process that finds flaws and corrects for them, eliminating this type of concern.
However, it is exactly the argument that can be used against blind faith religions. Since there is no justification for the correctness of a
deity-inspired scripture, and some of these writings are obviously wrong, how do we know the others are right?
CasualTS 6 months ago
It's called quote-mining. And many many creationists have become famous for it
Spocktacular96 7 months ago