Added: 3 years ago
From: NASAtelevision
Views: 41,674
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (64)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Soo much for going back to the moon! You can't even get into low earth orbit anymore! At this rate i'll be the next man on the moon! Fuck it! Obama just get to the point, start the damn war!

  • could totally solve all women's parking problems!

  • Needs to be powered by a bored out and blown 454 wit h high rise manifolds and a chrome exhaust! YES!!!

  • parallel parkin looks easy lol.

  • all I can say about the current state of the moon program is: JOHN MADDEN JOHN MADDED JOHN MADDEN

    seriously, nasa, that is ALL anyone does in your little simulator...

  • i effing hate nationalism

  • on the moon it will work even better because of the lower gravity force

  • i have about 21 of um

  • Build my ship to Mars.

  • Whats it run in the quarter mile? hahaha just kiddin I wish they would get up to the moon already too

  • It may be fundamentally easier to build mars-worthy rockets to be launched from the moon. It would take far less fuel, due to the lessened escape velocity, and they would reach a higher initial speed, due to the moon's addition to the Earth's speed as it rotates around our moving planet.

    We're not sure, though. We need more data. We can get far better data in a manned mission with our current technology than we had been able to get before.

  • @nunchucker I really can't see the point of launching a rocket from the moon to mars. I thought most of the energy needed to reach Mars is used for escaping earth's gravity.. In order to get stuff to the moon, we still need to spend that energy, plus some extra for the complications of moonlanding and relaunch..

    It seems to make more sense to me to launch directly to mars..

  • The moon missions were faked in a studio. To see a partial summary of the evidence of fakery, google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th post from the top.

    Also, do a YouTube search on "MarsFaker".

  • @Cosmored Another conspiracy theorist...

    Rationalist>Atheist>Religious Nuts> Magicians> Conspiracy Theorist

  • @AgrivatedKillah

    "Another conspiracy theorist"

    Why don't you analyze some of the actual evidence? Here's a link to some  of it.

    spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487

    If I don't answer, it's because I got blocked again.

  • Look at Obama smiling. He must be thinking, "too bad I'm going to cancel your program."

  • What exactly will a moonbase accomplish?

  • Why is the Spacesuit so huge? is it a toilet in the back? Or a fast food case?

  • Of course it's a toilet......they don't have restrooms on the moon...

  • @wardbundle

    they must be peeing in it as they march along!

    No they are just the entry compartments as seen at the end of the parade.

  • I MISS HEIDEMARIE!

  • mars could have a blue! sky !

    what colour is mars red, yellow or almost identicle to earth?

  • The Lunar Rover is cool and I long to 2018 when we are going back to the Moon and establish a permanent base there. But the spacesuit is so fucking ugly! They should use the Bio Suit instead.

  • if you can build some that work, yeah ... why not

  • I think a moon motorcycle would be a better idea, as long as it's not a Harley.

  • yes but on the moon ur in 1/4 earths gravity

  • actually 1/6

  • @vijil yes, was about to say the same thing

  • WOW ! That looks lke you are on Mars if was´nt for the blue sky ! The latter part of the video in the desert...

  • +3000? Where would we get those temperatures? We aren't going to Venus or Mercury, probably just mars and the moon for now.

    But I agree with you. But you have to think, public image is also important. You need to get people interested. That's a really big part of this. There's no reason why design can't somehow to incorporated, even if its minimal.

  • i understand what you meen , still , those in the '60 weren't beautifull , but they got people interested

  • i wonder if it more harder to get back in being that if our not lined up with the door . and stuff.

  • We seriously need to design a more elegant looking space suit.

  • they probably will for mars.

  • key//west---

  • WOW that is amazing how you go from inside to outside.

  • Go NASA!

  • 4:00  I want one!

  • I can't wait for the return to the Moon! I sure hope NASA TV will be HD by then - it would be fun to watch the moon walks/drives in high def!!

  • Oh what I wouldn't give for that to one day replace the 'reality tv' that we have today... How about some real 'reality tv' from the moon? I'd enjoy that.

  • that's a fantastic idea..some tv producer should get on that

  • @mjbvideo damn how long have we come

  • @mjbvideo its been canceled unfortunately :( i was well upset

  • that backpack thing looks heavy

  • it's empty, so not really

  • Hey, how did you know? :)

  • because that's the box they use to get in and out, they don't really want to fill it up with stuff

  • actually they get in through the back of the suit not the backpack so it would be filled with stuff

  • that backpack thing, is not a pack, it's more a door, didn't you watch the video? see how the only way from the rover into the suit is through the pack?

  • no they open the pack of the suits not the packs . i doubt they would go on the lunar surface in their suits with no oxygen or other equipment they need

  • Kay, I thought you were the guy or something :)

  • They use that backpack to enter the extra space suits when they are on the moon. (In 2010)

  • it certainly won't be heavy on the moon :)

  • Give the Pope back his wheels, man.

  • Fantastic!, Way to go NASA, we are all very proud of your endeavors. That's the true!

  • Awesome!

  • realy nice..

  • now lets hope obama does'nt cancel nasa entirely.

  • @geargemartin if obama cancels nasa ill be so upset

  • Ya know? He "canceled" the previous lunar program. He claims it was "unimaginative". Meaning, the command & lunar module looked too much like the 60's version.  WTF? If it gets us back to the moon, looks aren't important! And WTF is this S#!T with 1 man/president, having total power to cancel entire space programs??? Each proceeding president becomes more and more like a freak'n King/Emperor than a president. I HATE to quote a Kanye song, but....No 1 man should have all that power.

  • @gjc82071 word.

  • NASA's participation in the parade was awesome.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more