Added: 3 years ago
From: Carscom
Views: 56,207
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (259)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • SRX IS THE BEST!

  • Lincoln, the entire new line up is world class. Ford is doing an excellent job at global success, AMERICAN CAR COMPANY THAT IS ENJOYS GLOBAL SUCCESS, FORD EUROPE, FOCUS RS, MONDEO STRONG IN ASIA AND EUROPE. FORD, DOMINANT TRUCK LINE, GLOBAL, RANGER, 5CYL TURBO WITH GREAT STYLE. ONLY AN IDIOT WOULD NOT BE AWARE OF THIS AMERICAN BRAND THAT HAS SUCH STRONG GLOBAL RELEVANCE AND SALES SUCCSESS...HAVE A LOOK AT THEIR SALES. THE UNKNOWNING SHOULD KEEP THEIR IGNORANCE TO THEMSELVES.

  • the lincoln looks like shit compare to the srx

  • @55WazGoinOn55 are you crazy? lincolns have always looked classier than cadillacs, and they are better built. for the record im not a ford fan, im actually a toyota guy. my mother just bought an mkt, she also looked at the srx as well.

  • SRX has better interior quality than MKT ? Makes me wonder if you actually know what material quality is ...

  • Wouldn't SRX vs MKX and Enlave vs MKT make more sense??

  • if i didnt get my 2010 acura mdx i definitely would have gotten a cadillac srx

  • That Lincoln is the ugliest car I have ever seen.

  • This Lincoln is ugly as fuck, srx is lookin good!

  • ok so i agree the cadillac srx has better exterior looks, but the interior of the srx better? Im not sure what Mike is thinking!?

  • SRX better looking-

  • At least the SRX doesn't look like a genital wart.

  • they are the same thing,same kind of car

  • americans still need to work on the styling

  • @jpmahone Different strokes for different folks. Just because someone from 'over the pond' thinks American cars are ugly doesn't mean that the manufacturers over here and doing a poor job. It's just what appeals to us.

  • @theaxiom222 i completely agree. the MKT is really in its own class. Too big for a crossover. Almost like the new 2011 Odyssey van. The new MKX probably wasn't released at this auto show so they couldn't compare.

  • i love the look and interior of the cadillac. not saying that the lincoln is a bad car i just really dont think you should compare it to a cadillac, maybe a buick or sumin.

  • Lincoln MKT is the ugliest thing to come along since the Aztec! it looks like an upside down bathtub. Also, in the features category, The Cadillac has ONStar which is a huge advantage in safety and security.

  • @dexter3333 I hate to say it, because I'm a Ford guy mostly, but you're right. The rear hatch says PT Cruiser, and it just is not nearly as elegant as the Cadillac.

  • Comment removed

  • bullshit for styling!! if some body looked at both cars next to each other they will go to the Lincoln. bullshit again the interior looks like a orgasm in the lincoln. when the cadillac is eating a dick in front of you!!

  • @2003LincolnLS What a classy way of offering your point of view. Obviously others will take you seriously and consider modifying their opinions because you come off as such an intelligent and eloquently well spoken individual.

  • @2003LincolnLS I agree with you. I think the lincoln looks way better inside and out.

  • @2003LincolnLS Alright have fun with your up side down bath tub.

  • @userguy1234able lol dont you mean the whale. lol i well take the lincoln over a caddy in a heart beat!

  • @2003LincolnLS And I'll take a Cadillac over a Lincoln in a heart beat

  • @userguy1234able shit whatever! just dont get mad when i see YOU on the side off the road broken down. lol GM = PISS OF SHIT! i had so many GMs all they do is burn oil and brake down. so i went with a REAL company. FORD BITCHH!!!

  • @2003LincolnLS I'm still sticking with my own opinion. May be if you don't sound like a pre-mature person and use real details as to why "GM is unreliable" then I will be convinced. Until then have fun refusing to use a mature word choice and a lack of a convincing opinions.

  • @userguy1234able lol this is youtube. not English class. idiot

  • Comment removed

  • @2003LincolnLS Still I don't care whether or not this youtube or English class. I just stated what was going to convince me. Which you still fail to succeed at that.

  • @userguy1234able umm good for u!!?!

  • @2003LincolnLS You are really illogical. I don't know why you consider me to be stupid.

  • @userguy1234able wtf!?!

  • @2003LincolnLS God you're so stupid.

  • @userguy1234able whatever! have fun with ur piss of shit Cadillac!

  • @2003LincolnLS The reason why your GM cars broke down so fast is because of how stupid your are. You have trouble understanding your own language. I don't even how you can even drive considering your logic.

  • @userguy1234able umm no. more than half of GM is owned by the government. and the goverment finds the cheapest shit then sells it three times the price. which means they break down faster then other brand cars. so SUCK MY DICK!! get your facts right bro and stop replying !! thanks and have a nice day! ^_^

  • @2003LincolnLS You fail. You are not even using facts. The government wanted to bail out GM and get the company back on it's legs. The government claimed that they have no other intention with GM. GM has been making a fair share of cars that beat out Ford. Cadillac nowadays has way more accolades then Lincoln. I may seem bias but from what I know (which is more than what you know). Most of the statements in may comment seem to be true. Try to prove me wrong.

  • @userguy1234able wow ur still going at it!! dude the new Lincoln MKZ vs the Cadillac CTS. the Lincoln is more luxury and about the same sporty as Cadillac. but the outside of the cts is ugly compared to the mkz. now this is my last reply!! so get off my dick bro!! shit

  • @2003LincolnLS Yeah I'm still going at it. You fail at knowing the difference between opinions and facts.

  • In the first place why would you compare a 7 passenger to a 5, of course the 7 will have more leg room in the seond row, built for it. Next lincoln has gotten ugly with its grills, liked the last version of them but not these. Then again buying a luxury car, go GM all the way give me that Cadi. Ford may have been on top for a while, but they are gonna fall to GM who is thinking ahead. GO GM!!!

  • @knack0125 The game is over ford is pulling ahead and will never fall to goverment motors.

  • THE FRONT END OF THE LINCOLN IS UGLY AS SHIT!!

  • Lincoln vehicles always appealed to me more than Cadillac vehicles.

  • the Lincoln has to be my favorite luxury crossover ever. Motor trend calls the SRX very NOT comfortable and loud. The MKT is better built, prettier, more comfortable, and believe or not, faster. And it never took bailout to design it

  • I do believe that cadillac will evenueally will have to come with a suv with a third row seat the reason is that everybody don't and will not pay 75-80k dollors for escalade.

  • This is like comparing a Suburban to a Ford Escape....different size vehicles. As someone else stated the MKX is the competitor with the SRX. It's funny that you key up on the Microsoft Sync in the MKT but fail to mention that the SRX has a 40gb hard drive built into the vehicle so you don't even need a portable audio device.

  • The MKT is very bold and unique. You have to see it in person. It's very handsome and well refined, inside and out. I just think it's hard for people to accept a different styling direction from Ford after following Germany and Japan for so many years. The SRX just looks like a Lexus knock off. Its nice but not really interesting. Saw both at the International Auto show this wknd and the MKT was the most popular crossover there.

  • The Cadillac is wayyyyyyy better looking.

  • Interesting. I purchased an SRX a week ago and absolutely love it. I never shopped the MKT as I wasn't looking for that size vehicle.

  • Cadillac SRX FTW

    Have one

  • I like them both, and honestly, turn radius would be the ice breaker for me.... Seeing how the srx is Opel based, you would think it's far more agile than the Lincoln... Thing is, I've driven a flex... It's the most quiet, comfortable vehichle I've ever driven, and that's an understatment. If anyone has driven both, I'd love to hear their opinion!

  • ok well i find tthat the mkt is wayy better well to tht is ...the srx is a small car and im a talll guy and if i waz in tht i would look like a clown comin out of a clown car...the mkt is wayy better looks to me and is a wonderful look o is. the srx looks to much like a sport kinda thing and the mkt look more professionaland as the videos jus said it has wayy better features then the srx...and the rims are chrome and thr grill is awsome. and the bucket seat is amazing....itz a 10/10 on my charts

  • IM WITH LINCOLN ALL THE WAY!!!!

  • The SRX competes with the Lincoln MKX not the MKT. It makes me really upset when they compare things that people don't cross shop

  • @theaxiom222 I agree with you, I don't know why they comparing the Cadillac SRX to the Lincoln MKT instead of the MKX. The SRX and the MKX not the MKT are competing directly against the Lexus RX350. the SRX and the MKT are not in the same class and you can tell because the MKT ends with the letter T not the letter X.

  • @theaxiom222 No the Caddy competes with Audi, BMW, Merc etc the Lincoln is no where close yet they are still just chromed out Ford's.

    Lincoln is no where close to where Caddy is now.

  • @theaxiom222 they may just compare based on fuel economy space and engine size which is complete bullshit

  • i like the mkt more than the flex, the flex is too boxy, ford is a better company than gm, ford didnt ask 4 a bailout or ask 4 for $ from obama unlike gm

  • The MKT looks more like a wagon than an actual crossover...it hardly has any ground clearance. Plus, the tail-lamps are just not good looking if you ever see the vehicle in any other color other than red. They're way too big.

  • go lincoln all the way

  • I like its new grill (it has sort of a knight's helmet look), the tail-lamps are just huge, not very smooth on the eyes, but that's just me.

  • Some real intelligent discussion here, I see.

  • Comment removed

  • I hope the 2010 SRX is more improved , in gas milage, than the 2006 which I have. My 06 has never passed a gas station it didn't like, I insult my E320 and Lincoln Towne, by keeping them in the same garage with the SRX

  • Comment removed

  • Dude. Cadillac of course. if you compare a cheap Ford Lincoln to a Ballin' Caddy you're an idiot.

    Cadillac will destroy Lincoln in every category

    Don't give me the weak ass eco-boost bullshit excuse.

    Eco boost is 350 HP that aint shit its the strongest lincoln

  • @untouchablewealth FUCK YOU AND YOUR CADDY LINCOLN IS THE BEST AMERICAN LUXURY RIDE IT HAVES BETTER AND NICER RIDES CADDY DON'T HAVE SHIT COMPARE TO LINCON

  • @untouchablewealth Listen Bicth I ain't no wetback I don't give a fuck how expensive the caddy's are they ain't shit Lincoln looks better and looks more gangster Lincoln Has badass rides and u no it puto just like FORD is better than CHEVY

  • Cadillac is the best as usual

  • It's all about what your looking for SRX=Performance MKT=Luxury

    Lincoln has always been a premium luxury brand. Caddilac is trying to change their image a little. Both have their purposes and serve them well.

  • wat are u talkin about, The mtk is availible with a 355 hp eco boost? How is that not more performance??

  • @88soulsurvivor I typed that before I found out about optional ecoboost for this vehicle. It's a nice package!!!

  • Why not compare the SRX with the MTX?

    Well ill do that.

    The MTX feels cheap inside, and the overall ride quality feels like a Jeep.

    SRX feels like it's gliding on ice.

  • Ok and Im suppose to hate Lincoln now??

  • BTW MTX is an Audio company. The MKX is made by lincoln and yes it is ugly but the ride isn't that bad. Never heard anything bad about the ride but it is ugly. The cars look good but the crossovers are very creepy looking, Lincoln needs to stick to all cars. Leave crossovers to Caddy.

  • If I had the Lincoln MKT I would nigger pimp it out so much...put some suicide doors and blacked out rims with a sound system

  • Why are the two being compared? They're two different categorized crossovers?

  • I like the front of the Lincoln, HATE the back.

  • I agree, the MKT looks bad on video and in picture. but in person its beautiful. It feels very expensive. I like it in person. the cadillac looks good on video and in person

  • the lincoln mkt is big, ugly, heavy, useless. why lincoln? why? why make a a fleet of cars and suvs that all have the same front end styling. the lincoln brand also seem to use the same chrome wheels in all their models as well. slow, forgettable, and overpriced

  • somebody explain the point of the mkt? it seems to me that it's just a flex?

  • I think American cars have made a really good comeback. Pretty soon, maybe a year or two, American cars will be doing very well when being compared to high end German cars.

  • i'm german, and i have to agree totally,

  • yeah it seems as if GM and Ford have learned their lesson.

  • @desimunda116

    no way -.- you cant compare that lincoln with the horrible design and that will look old very fast compared to a BMW which has a better design, better motor almost better everything...

  • @desimunda116

    no way -.- you cant compare that lincoln with the horrible design and that will look old very fast compared to a BMW which has a better design, better motor almost better everything...

  • @desimunda116 Cadillac now ranks equal to or higher than all comprable German brands acording to a study on quality by JD Power and Associates.

    Detroit is back and Caddy is ready to battle Germany's best and to embarass the douches that think highly of them solely for the badge on their hood.

  • @Greendude33 Yeah the quality has gone way up but many people are still not convinced. I have people in my family that say that they wouldn't get an American car even if it was given to them for free. Its because we have a Chrysler Pacifica, our first American car purchase and actually our first non-Japanese purchase and this thing has been a load of problems. Transmissions already had to be replaced, indicators barely ever work. Our Accord is older and still runs like the day we bought it.

  • @desimunda116 Cadillac has nothing to do with Chysler whatsoever. That's like me calling Nissan's crap b/c a Toyota's stuck acellerator drove somone off a cliff.

    As of late GM and Ford underwent a massive rebound and are now holding their own with the imports once again. That's impressive seeing as all the problems they had to address a few years ago.

  • @Greendude33 Man trust me I told them the same thing. GM is improving but Ford is like a whole new company now. I still think they need to give the Mustang fully independent rear suspension. I love Japanese and German cars but I have to admit Ford and GM are making a good comeback. I wouldn't be surprised if I found myself at one of their dealerships for my next car.

  • @desimunda116

    And here we are. 1 year after you wrote this comment and still i dont know a single american built car that sells successfully outside america.

  • I don't think this is a fair comparison at all. The SRX is a small SUV, I would compare it to an Equinox or a GLK. The Lincoln is more of a low down wagon I think, I would compare it more with a Flex, or an R-Class.

    The only reason the Cadillac is named a 'Crossover' is because Cadillac couldn't call it an SUV. Just the category itself would put people off of buying one.

  • jamesysam002: an suv has a truck based chassie, a crossover has a car based chassie, so it is a crossover technically, caddilacs suv is the escalade

  • You're completely wrong? The reason Cadillac called it a crossover is because it is? That's why I competes with other crossovers like The Lexus RX, Volvo XC60. and Audi Q5

  • I've never hated a automobile as bad since the Aztek, the MKT takes it to the next level. It looks like a fat lard whale with the typical hideous "Lincoln" rear end. Lincoln should have kept the Aviator around and dumped the Mountaineer. It was a better 7-seat midsize Lincoln than either the MKX or MKT. And was built how a Lincoln should be, body on frame with all independent suspension and a decent V8.

  • I agree that the Aviator was a nice vehicle, but body-on-frame just doesn't cut it anymore for a luxury vehicle. They have good longevity at the cost of increased road noise and fuel economy. A modern luxury SUV should be a crossover; think about it - if the Aviator had suited the market's needs, Lincoln would not have abandoned it. Ford has sold the most SUVs out of any company, and has noticed a big enough decline in sales of the body-on-frame style that they are now readjusting.

  • Oh, and learn how to spell 'FISKER' dumbass. Wow, only a retard would spell Fisker 'Fiskar'. That proves you are a full blown assface.

  • Wow, terryfilming you're even more of a retard than I thought. What, you didn't think I knew that the Fisker was about $90,000? Wow.

  • Hey terryfilming, I think I know the fisker is around $80,000. Alright? I mailed the order form which said base MSRP was $87,900, and that I should expect it from July-August. The deposit was $5,000. Just because it has a high price means I can't afford one? Then you're a total bitch if you judge people like that. OK lincolns aren't that bad, but to me, I wouldn't want to drive one. terryfilming shut up u retard, at least I can afford a fisker, go screw your Honda Civic asshole

  • buy them and help the economy , or buy  Q7 and help yourself....

  • Lincolns suck alright? And leafsrule how can you say no other car has better luxury than a Lincoln? How the fuck can you say that? I can think of 30 bajillion car makers better than Lincoln. I just preordered my fisker karma, look it up. It makes lincoln like a piece of shit with piss on top, so how bout YOU SUCK IT!!!!!

  • woahh no need to get so agressive

  • Lincoln's DO NOT 'suck'.

    You probably hate it becasue it can't lift AND BECASUE OF YOUR OBESE BODY.

    Why don't you have sex with your mother in a Cadillac?  wouldn't be caught dead in one.

  • shut up

  • And by the way, you are not pre-ordering that car. The Fiskar Karma is over 80,000 dollars, retard.

  • my dad has this car and no other car company can beat lincoln's luxury

  • Im gonna pretend like I didnt just read that....

  • yea that rights u jealous bunkrupt fanboy

  • I dont get it!!! should there be any commas? is it a question? Like, I am so not getting what you just said, at all.

    But on the other hand, I can think of 10 other cars that can, and always do, beat the lincolns luxury (luxury used very lightly in this case). Even the S-Type beats it. Lincoln sucks, and its clear you woiuld like to start makin assumptions, but here is one solid fact: that car your father has is for pussies!!! & girls... oh wait, Im a girl and I dont even like it.

  • lincoln doesnt suck. you suck. and its clear YOU would like the start makin assumptions but heres one solid fact: your a whore

  • Yes, I am a whore actually... Thank you very much babe.

  • fordont have nothing to compare cadilac..

  • lincoln lost years ago.... a long long long long time ago. Weak engines, look at the new Navigator, 300 hp, while the escalade has over 400, even the Yukon has more hp than the navigator. And what the hell is up with the MKZ? is that a re-grilled Fusion??? Its horrible in every way.

    And you are like so just on here to argue and call people names, but you suck so bad. Nobody likes you loser. You couldnt get a girlfriend if a girl had AIDS and dating you was the cure... Die alone, you insect .

  • okay now go and fuck your dad and your caddys kay u stuck stuck up whore

  • They forget that SRX has Onstar Gen IV in place of Sync, and XM radio with all the connectivity of the Sync and more, so how does the MKT win?

  • because cady went bankrupt and everybody loves lincoln so suck it bitch

  • SRX interior better??? LMAO this guy is blind and/or retarded.

  • thats what i said :P

  • caddy is better mkt look like shit.

  • mkt is not shit, you're shit. full of it! shitface

  • this was so pointless.

  • Gotta be the MKT i already ordered one

    The SRX looks plain silly. Get the 'lad CTS or escalade, there shouldn't be an inbetween.

  • Comment removed

  • They're both crossovers, so you would have to say that about both SRX and MKT. Caddy is better, drove 'em both.

  • I thought the SRX was sluggish and VERY heavy. The rear seats are a joke especially when they say they are targeting empty nesters with it. No adults in the back seat longer than 20 minutes.

    Sad that an Enclave gets better MPG and room,

  • Never been too impressed with Lincoln's designs. Don't like the unibrow tail light of this MKT. The SRX is a stark improvement over it's predecessor. Red, imo, never seems to do justice on vehicles. Try seeing the SRX in white or titanium.....striking!!

  • Sorry, but the MKT looks like a bathtub on wheels. The Caddy isn't perfect either but between the two the Cadillac has a much more youthful and athletic appearance. Like it or not Cadillac is the only American car company that has been able to compete successfully against BMW etc.

  • This is not the right comparison the MKX is the Linclon crossover that should challenge the SRX

  • I totally agree. The MKT is a much larger, roomier vehicle.

  • It may be a push but I think the Buick Enclave is a closer competitor to the MKT than the Caddy SRX

  • Lincoln is not going for the athletic look. It's all about luxury at a semi-affordable price. The guy said it, the Lincoln is more comfortable and has more features.

  • Lincoln seem more re-fined, classic. Cadillac still the "look -at-me" factor, more sporty. I prefer the Lincoln MKT style. Lincoln conts. in this direction, they will be a premier luxury brand again!

  • both of these cars r ugly!!

  • I agree with whoever jusrt said that Cadillacs are associated with blacks and the old people. Lincoln will always have a better quality than that piece of shit.

  • I like the Lincoln, the Cadillac is to ugly

  • Not ALL Cadillacs are ugly, but I hate the fact that they are usually associated with black people who invest a LOT of money in them or old people. Cadillacs can be VERY ugly and I'd rather buy a Lincoln.

  • The linciln is gross

  • I seriously think that cadillac needs to incorporate some more high tech features in the 2010 srx (i.e. heated/cooled seats,heated/cooled cupholders,lane departure warning,night vision,magnetic ride control,brake assist and a third engine.............)

  • Heated/cooled seats and variable damping are on there.

  • I love the edge,2010 taurus,flex,escape,and fusion :)

  • Oh thats nice.Ford makes some really good looking cars dont they!!

  • r u kidding linkins have cheaper quality than cadillacs come on by the caddy!!!!!!!!!>:)

  • just wait for the 300hp turbocharged srx engine its going to make a huge improvement in the performance, which is already good.

  • What Cadillac really needs is a bigger, fresh rwd sedan

  • Im planning to purcase the SRX 2010. This will be a babe vehicle for sure. lol!

  • my wife traded in her 2007 srx for a audi q5 i love the q5 im so glad she got rid of the station waggon looking thing.

  • What does that have to do with this video?? and when the 2010 cadillac srx comes out its going to be way better than the q5 I hope.Cadillac is the only brand of cars that that i care about right now.They are coming back. And when they come back I hope that they dont make the same mistakes as made in previous years (i.e. poor quality, reliability issues,and so on)But all-in-all They need to build a larger lineup that can go up against more competitive models.I really hope the best for cadillac.

  • The quality in lincolns isnt anything compared to the quality in cadillacs.. I love all lincolns and think theyre attractive on the outside but not this one....but anyway cadillac quality is way higher :)

  • It actually depends,the cts has a much higher quality then the mkz but the mks has better quality then the dts(probably cuz the dts is old) but overall i'd agree with you cadillac has better quality.

  • thank you !! id choose the caddy over the lincoln anyday

  • cadillac vs lincoln like elvis vs mj elvis king and mj great intertiner but cadillac is king

  • i was kind of disappointed with the looks of the tail lights of the mkt, but after staring at it for an hour and squinting its looks are pretty nice. however, it is an amazing, car with an available 3.5 ltr 355 hp eco boost engine and park assist ( it parks it self) a fridge box, duel headrest entertainment system, and heated AND cooled seats in 1st and 2nd row ( yes 2nd row has cooled seats, thats a first) im grabbing it at the first sign it came out

  • I live in Oakville where these are produced and for the first time today saw 3 of them going out for tests, and just like the ford flex i hated the styling at first but then again looked at it for a while and it grew on me, and i like it.

  • I'm pretty sure the SRX competes the the MKX. Both nice wagons tho err... I mean CUVs.

  • Comment removed

  • I know its your opinion but the lincolns interior is a little square. I mean old lookin. I mean the sqaure radio ,dont get me wrong it is very nice but the caddy has a more detailed intrusment panel

  • mkt's interior is a bit better in my opinion

  • Crossovers are all ugly as sin. But their target audiences are middle-aged soccer mom's, so it doesn't matter what I think.xD

  • The MKT is the ugliest luxury crossover IMO. Like oxmoxa said it resembles a whale, and the taillights are hideous they only work on the MKX.

  • WHAT THE HELL WAS FORD THINKING WHEN THEY DESIGNED THE MKT? what was there car supposed to look like a hipppo?

  • well @ least ford isnt asking obama for $ unlike gm

  • Comment removed

  • The cadillac looks alright, but the lincoln is hideous it looks like a whale.

  • They're both automotive design abortions. There needs to be a shakeup in the deisgn studio employee pool.

  • i really think this an unfair comparison, the mkt has a third row and you could almost qualify it as a wagon. The better comparison is the buick enclave v. mkt. I really love the SRX and plan on buying one, but the mkt is really ugly, except the front end.

  • mkt can also paralell park its self.

  • Who cares? If you can't parallel park you should have your license taken away.

  • well, i don't need to parallel park that often because there are many parking lot. without much experience, automatic is a good idea.

  • Lincoln cars are a piece of crap i had a 2001 lincoln LS back in 2000 and those piceces of shit had a recall and i bought the thing brand new the the problem was the axels in the cars were on wrong never again will purchase a lincoln, best car i had so far was CLK 430 and my has Audi

    good qualitys and u pay for what u get honda and acuras are good nissan is crap toyota is good kia crap.

  • You were so quick to try and prove me wrong - which rarely ever happens - that you fucked up.

    NEXT TIME READ WHAT I FUCKING TYPE BEFORE YOU OPEN YOUR DICK HOLE.

  • NO IT ISN'T

    The GENESIS is a Luxury Sedan.

    The GENESIS COUPE is a sport's coupe.

    Are you on drugs or do you have problems reading English?

  • the hyundai is nothing like the mks. the genesis is a poor quality car unfit to drive on the same road as the mks

  • well, the options are one thing, it has a better ride, and i cant pull off the dash! if i close the genesis door on my fingers the door will shatter. face it the genesis is overpriced piece of shit.

  • I love them both! Either one (or both) would look great in my garage.

  • I don't acceept that.

    the MKS and the Genesis ARE THE SAME TYPE OF CAR. Do a comparison on Yahoo auto's.

    They are both full sized luxury cars. They are about the same length, about the same height come with the same options...