Added: 2 years ago
From: TIOMACHUKA
Views: 19,095
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (46)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • She can't sing any of the old tracks in time! lololol!

  • i preffer the old version, not to offend anyone

  • fucking rules!!!!

  • Have a nice day!

    from the Netherlands/Holland

    ...

  • actually, they kicked liiva because his performance wasn't dynamic enough and he couldn't keep up with the rest of the band. if you listen to the aces high cover with liiva, you see that he's often cutting off in the middle of the sentences to inhale, so that kind of held the band back, so they held auditions and they took angela cuz she had the BEST AUDITION (if you say otherwise, you don't know anything), and since she was a female vocalist, the band knew it would make the band more dynamic

  • Sigh the solos lacked the brain melting solos on the original version bleargh, Chris WTF happened?

  • LOL Use this version take out Angela's Vocals and replace it with Johan's = Eargasmic!

  • I think the original sounded better in every way...

  • ANGELAAAAAAAAAA solo una

  • Anyone else find that Gossow puts way too much emphasis on each syllable throughout this album?

  • I love Arch Enemy and I think angela rocks, but they really shouldn't have tried to fit her vocals over Liiva's. The original was fantastic.

  • Comment removed

  • liiva was good on this song too

    but the way he sings it its like he can't keep up with the lyrics and the guitar beat

    you can understand it more and it sounds kinda exasperating but the way angela sings it... it feels right lol

    tho its harder to understand her haha

  • @Tsakan2 its probably intentional

  • nevertheless Angela still rules, she is super live performer and very good person! And Liiva also rules!

  • I think she said humatinity lol

  • I love that when a band changes vocalists, there is a large arguement over which is better, but if a band changes guitarists, noone so much as bats an eyelash.

  • These songs were much darker than the new AE songs, and this high voice doesnt suit simply. Personally i think Athems of the rebellion was their and will be their best album, and still prefer the first 3 cd than the last 3.

  • Angela's a better singer than Johan but ever since she joined the band, they've softened up and lost all the edge and energy they used to possess.

  • no matter what vocalist is on, Arch Enemy rules!!

  • this new version sounds too forced. theyre trying to fix something that don't need fixin.

  • I can't understand you guys.. Johan Liva is a big shit compared with angela. And I don't know how you can say the original is better.. If you really think it, stop listening music or go washing your ears...

    Have a good day ;)

  • @SanTheDrummer I couldn't understand eighter, but its actually a bit different - The fans of Liva just got used to him, to the old Arch Enemy and when Angela came they just still can't accept her. Like Anette in Nightwish - she sings good, but the fans hate her...

  • @SanTheDrummer Okay, that has to be the most ignorant opinion I've heard all day... and like your opinion, other people have their opinions, and I think Johan Liiva's version is a hell of a lot better, if they only remastered the song, and not changed it like they did in this version, then maybe it'd catch my taste, but this, in my opinion, sucks compared to the original. By the way, before you start bitching and complaining, you can't prove an opinion wrong, so have a good day, sir.

  • Honestly, I like Angela more then johan in this, its just the guitar is more lame in this. But I agree johan was great its just I think angela beat him in this song. I guess shes better in some songs and johan was better in others. (Its just my opinion, I guess majority rules me out since everyone thinks johan is better in this.)

  • Johan Liva is better by any means than Angela..not just in this song.

  • Johan Liva sang this a way much better than Angela, some of the power in the old version is lost in this one.

  • The voice may be better, bet the sure fucked up the guitar on the re-do....

  • Original is definitely way better.

  • Original is better especially the solo

  • the original version is better

  • Angela sings good!

  • i couldnt hear johan properly in the old one...

  • she did a better job with these songs on the live apocalypse dvd

  • her voice in live concerts is AWESOME!!!

  • Interesting that they re-did these songs. I like Angela just fine, but there was an amount of energy and desperation in Johan Liiva's voice that I'm missing here. But the good news - they'll definitely be playing more old songs in the upcoming tours!

  • @LeftyLV426 yeah Johan had something that is not here.Don't get me wrong Angela is amazing but she is even better live wish they had redone Seed of Hate :(

  • @LeftyLV426 so true man, the energy and desperation is what makes his work with Arch Enemy some of my favorite vocal performances

  • @LeftyLV426 At least the original version you can feel Johan's Desperation and Franticness when he delivered the good on The Immortal.

  • @LeftyLV426 Angela is kinda killing this band... They used to be SO much better.

  • @SCREAMSofAGONY

    kkk.. u MUST to find out about arch enemy..

    angela is fucking better than that guy, and its not me that is telling this for you, as i said, u must to find out about arch enemy and compare, the last band and the band today.. so u'll see, angela is better.. D;

  • @LeftyLV426, the remakes remind me of what happened when Anthrax decided to re-record the Joey Belladonna songs with John Bush.

  • One of my favorite AE songs.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more