Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT: We now know that the effect of CO2 on temperature is small, we know why it is small, and we know that it is having very little effect on the climate.
Professor Don J. Easterbrook of WWU: "The Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO) indicates we are entering a 30-year cooling period."
Arctic ice is expanding, with the 2008 minimum 700,000 sq. km. greater than 2007 minimum, and 2009 minimum 300,000 sq. km. greater than 2008
"Lindzen has claimed that the risks of smoking, including passive smoking, may be overstated[24]. In 2001,[24] Newsweek journalist Fred Guterl reported, after an interview with Lindzen, "Lindzen clearly relishes the role of naysayer. He'll even expound on how weakly lung cancer is linked to cigarette smoking. He speaks in full, impeccably logical paragraphs, and he punctuates his measured cadences with thoughtful drags on a cigarette."[24]"
Typical propaganda from Newsweek, which is solidly behind the globalists' CO2 and Climate Change agenda, along will most of the corporate media.
It's all about big bucks. General Electric, owner of NBC/CNBC/MSNBC, bribed Barbara Boxer to write the climate bill so airlines would have to buy GE engines.
All I am trying to say is: if a person is ready to say that smoking doesn't cause lung cancer, then I am going to be very critical to every word he speaks out - unlike you.
I know - he's meteorologist. Did I say that he is a cancer researcher?
Whatever, what else is written in the NewsWeek: he acknowledges that the earth is getting warmer, and that human activity might have something to do with it. only whereas most models predict a warming of 3 or 4 degrees centigrade in the next 100 years, Lindzen's calculations show less than 1... And it is said that he's a theorist, not a modeler, so... I quess, I just have no point in believing him, sorry.
Tavis, if the climate treaty passes, 100's of millions of the world's poor will starve due to the increased food prices.
The treaty will, however, allow the wealthy such as yourself to pollute as much as you like by buying carbon offsets.
The carbon tax is a license for the wealthy to pollute as much as they like while the poor pay the price.
Why do you talk about "climate change." Why don't you talk about pollution?
Could it be because CO2 is not a pollutant, and is essential to all life?
StopTheCarbonTax1 2 years ago
Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT: We now know that the effect of CO2 on temperature is small, we know why it is small, and we know that it is having very little effect on the climate.
Professor Don J. Easterbrook of WWU: "The Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO) indicates we are entering a 30-year cooling period."
Arctic ice is expanding, with the 2008 minimum 700,000 sq. km. greater than 2007 minimum, and 2009 minimum 300,000 sq. km. greater than 2008
arctic-roos . org
Google: ClimateGate
StopTheCarbonTax1 2 years ago
"Lindzen has claimed that the risks of smoking, including passive smoking, may be overstated[24]. In 2001,[24] Newsweek journalist Fred Guterl reported, after an interview with Lindzen, "Lindzen clearly relishes the role of naysayer. He'll even expound on how weakly lung cancer is linked to cigarette smoking. He speaks in full, impeccably logical paragraphs, and he punctuates his measured cadences with thoughtful drags on a cigarette."[24]"
Wikipedia: Richard Lindzen
baibucix 2 years ago
Typical propaganda from Newsweek, which is solidly behind the globalists' CO2 and Climate Change agenda, along will most of the corporate media.
It's all about big bucks. General Electric, owner of NBC/CNBC/MSNBC, bribed Barbara Boxer to write the climate bill so airlines would have to buy GE engines.
Google: barbara boxer general electric
StopTheCarbonTax1 2 years ago
So what? Are you sure that I am interested in this story? I am not even from USA
baibucix 2 years ago
All I am trying to say is: if a person is ready to say that smoking doesn't cause lung cancer, then I am going to be very critical to every word he speaks out - unlike you.
baibucix 2 years ago
They're trying to discredit him because his 20-year study of heat radiation into space proves that CO2 is not causing global warming.
He's not a cancer researcher.
StopTheCarbonTax1 2 years ago
I know - he's meteorologist. Did I say that he is a cancer researcher?
Whatever, what else is written in the NewsWeek: he acknowledges that the earth is getting warmer, and that human activity might have something to do with it. only whereas most models predict a warming of 3 or 4 degrees centigrade in the next 100 years, Lindzen's calculations show less than 1... And it is said that he's a theorist, not a modeler, so... I quess, I just have no point in believing him, sorry.
baibucix 2 years ago