Am I racist for saying that the 30,000 dollars my friend got in welfare over the past five years should have been taken, repackaged into a free college program over the course of thirty six months and then redistributed for books and tuition.
Wouldnt that over time turn a drain on the tax payer and turn her into a productive tax paying member of society thus paying for itself many times over? And the odds of her children attaining the same or higher level of education increase as well?
You can pretend the homeless are a new phenomenon despite their existence throughout history.
You can pretend these pretentious #ows nits are giving a coherent message, but we both know that is a bald faced lie. But if you think breakdown of Law and Social Order is the way to nirvana you are sadly mistaken and will eventually be dealt substantial setbacks from which you will not be able to recover. I stand with civil society and we will not long tolerate this.
Wrong Obongo. That's how it works in YOUR neighborhood as a direct result of gov interference in private matters. In the real world disparaging one's neighbors or potential customers gets one a quick ticket to bankruptcy and destitution. Maybe the force of Law is necessary to keep your behaviour civil. Without it, you would be on your own, rather lonely, but you would be able to let your inner demons loose. Consider it a favor.
Stossel's right. We fought for the right to be jerks as individuals if we choose. That's f'ing freedom. Govt should be fair and part of that is to ensure rights and not be in people's business. THE FREE MARKET WILL TAKE CARE OF ITSELF.
Liberty is the freedom to do the best one can without the shackles or shams of gov impeding one's progress. You can be a jerk if you choose to your own detriment. THAT is how free markets work.
@maskedphrogg Well I think we kind of agree frankly. I'm tired of the government assuming that people are naturally so bad and that they need to control us like lemmings. That is not freedom.
I don't see that. You focus on the "liberty" to act against one's own best interest. That is not quite the same thing. I fear what you hold against the gov is their inability or unwillingness to make decisions about social policy or individual behaviour that you agree with. I fear the gov making any such decisions at all.
Well, before I come on so bull headed someone labels me a Paulbot ;-) I'll just have to agree to agree.
I'm a Libertarian. I hold that the only legitimate use of gov, and it's inherent monopoly on violence, is to defend individuals from the application of force by others. My apologies if my earlier posts came off as combative. Sometimes I take purism to unintended extremes and don't recognize allies.
@maskedphrogg No worries. More and more I want the government out of things and I want to return to federalism. The government is no longer a power of the people entity although they do all this feel goodery bs to mask that they are taking control of people's lives. We need our individual liberties restored.
You obvioulsy didn't listen to anything Stossel said, guess I can go crash a black panthers party and that would go over real well right? People should be able to do what they wish on their own property so long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.
The person who posted this is living in the past. People have the god given right to be racist. As long as they are not physically hurting anyone else, they have the right to be stupid and racist. No government has the right to come into a business and tell them "you can not be racist, you have to hire a certain type of people that you don't want to hire for YOUR business.
The day Sen. ron Paul - started question Federal reserve audit and accountability . now theyr cooking a bad image and bringing files which r irrelevant now.
Fox news or fraud news please take a break and get to know who is bill o reily - he is serving his corporate masters and brokers (govet officials).
KKK members are infuriated that their town businesses have to provide services to everyone.
Their entire argument rests on slippery slope. The last I check, it was called a fallacy, but what does a cretin Teanuts knows about logical fallacies.
@ninuxy 'Their entire argument rests on slippery slope. The last I check, it was called a fallacy, ' Check again slippery slopes are only fallices when no mechanism is given and what is a teanut? It sounds like a type of biscuit.
WTF is this?? If a business chooses to not serve a person of specific race or religion, that is their decision! The government can't tell people who they are allowed to do business with! People, we don't NEED segregation laws anymore!! There is no blatant and violent racism in society now.
Stossel made quite a few very valid and important points that have been completely ignored. For example ... the Jim Crow Laws. Government enforced segregation. Rather than just removing the government enforced segregation, they went the other way and instituted government enforced association. If they had simply removed the segregation laws, business would have gone integrated all on their own, or they would have gone out of business. As the tide turns, so does business.
Um, I love how none of the top rated posters here paid attention in history class. Not to mention you are not paying attention to the clip. Neither one of them is saying that its O.K to be racist or gender biased. What they are saying is, that as a private business, or whatever you should have the right to chose who works for you and what not. Because he had a point, you do not see all Black colleges allowing white students and so forth...I'm against racism period.
Racism is legal it is not the business of Government, see the BLACK CAUCUS, SEE NEGRO COLLEGE FUND, freedom is the right not to do anything. U just don't get it. I have the right to be free from associating with dikes too. You don't think the Negro is racist then you live in another planet. Nonetheless a private business has the right to refuse anyone for any reason. FU congress the civil rights act should have be unconstitutional but our Judges are Douche bags.
how come whenever crappy liberals speak about pro-segregation movements they never mention malcolm x? He was also a leader of a pro segregation movement with pro-violence views. So why dont you tell the whole truth liberals? O I forgot you liberals aren't allowed to criticize anything minorities do, because that would be racist right? Liberals are so twisted up.
But for the record I am not against the civil rights act, it was necessary and I am a republican for full disclosure, could ya tell?
@JoeTheRock7 Couldn't tell at all, slick. You're just so Goddamned enlightened, we were blinded by the rays of light beaming out of your arse. How many liberals use Malcolm X as reference material? So fucking what if we don't criticise our own when they embarrass us. Shit, you tea baggers have kept your mouths shut about Palin, haven't you? Start throwing around a little "constructive criticism" on your own end before whining about the rest of us.
But it is okay to have a Black Congressional Caucus that does not allow a white congressman who represents a primarily black congressional district or ANY other races to be a part of it except for blacks. That is pure racism that is being allowed in our gov't. We will not over come racism while we have such things.
@1bad26 Dude..it's okay to be racist if you are a minority...especially if you are black and were a former slave as we all know every white person today personally owned slaves and ran large cotton plantations.
@RebelThoughts You are the moron. It was you and your Democrat pals that were the biggest racists. Stossel supposrts free choice and you equate that with racism, like racists would all of the sudden be dominating the country and the economy. LOL no racist business would survive these days. You and your affirmative action... etc.. democrat racist policies that force us to see skin color first and foremost.
John Stossel needs to be slapped by large wrestlers on a regular basis for his stupid comments regarding American Apartheid. These morons think the market is the answer to everything. No, mustache wearing dildo brain. Some businesses would have accomodated blacks but many others wouldn't so it was necessary for the government to step in and end this evil. There are plenty of countries you can move to where the government doesnt interfere with business, its called the Third World you idiot.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@gregor2968 "This is the most retarded video is have ever seen." Use correct english.What about this video is "retarded"?....I think stossel should be slapped for that view.
@tobiascam First of all, the production value were bloody appalling. My Grandma could do a better job of making a video than you. And she's dead! Secondly, if you are going to lecture me about correct English you must ensure that you use it as well. Have you read your description above? It's fucking unintelligible! Thirdly, whilst racism has no place in mordern society John Stossel is right. A person should be allowed to deny anyone access to their private property.
Jim Crow laws represent GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE in interpersonal relationships. Freedom of association, no laws dictating what people can or cannot do. Jim Crow laws represent BIG GOVERNMENT who has too much power. The counter Civil Rights represents BIG GOVERNMENT reversing itself. Get it? Government is force and it does not have your best interest at heart. It falls victim to "special interests" who take the helm and drive us all into hell. Keep gov't small and limited, no Jim Crow law
REALITY: The Jim Crow laws were state and local laws in the United States enacted between 1876 and 1965. They mandated de jure racial segregation in all public facilities, with a supposedly "separate but equal" status for black Americans. REALITY: The government had to change it's own laws. Government is FORCE. Don't blame the little people stuck in the middle! Governments have killed more people in the last 2,000 years than any other form of violence. Gov't world wide should be LIMITED.
stossel and rand are indeed racists as they don't agree with The Civil Rights Act that outlawed major forms of discrimination against blacks and women, including racial segregation. ... at the workplace and by facilities that served the general public. Whether you like it or not the Act helps prevent discrimination. And yes, you are still entitled to property provided the use of it doesn't violate this necessary protection. Private, non-public accommodating use is excluded.
@qsteveens you are an accusatory Hack for claiming those 2 men which I'm sure you don't personally know are racist, Obviously from your opinion on this, you must be Fascist, Probably Nazi descendant. ...lol..... see how that works, I just claim something about someone I don't know.,,,, and now somebody might think it true, not agreeing with any act does not make you racist, your world is pea sized, your stating all Punks are racist because they don't believe in statutes, acts or bills, educate..
Yes, I certainly label Rand a racist. His wanting to reverse the Civil Rights Act makes it clear where he stands. It okay with him if we have "Whites Only" resaurants again. You too?
I've heard him trying to squirm out of earlier statements he's made. Sorry, too late.
He's also a global warming denier despite the overwhelming evidence. No thanks rand paul. We have enough regressive policy makers. Time for him to go already!
@ReduceGHGs Obviously you don't believe in property ownership as you want the government to make decisions about what people are allowed to do on their own property, I personally think if there was a whites only restaurant it would fail because it wouldn't receive enough business after cutting out half its market, not to mention all the white people who wouldn't eat there (like me) based on the knowledge that it is a racist establishment, think with your head not your heart,
@ReduceGHGs its seems your more speaking on peoples viewpoints that you deem racist primarily because you fail to see the reasoning behind there point of view, so you create one that makes sense to you,. which is obviously the racism card. maybe if you read the republican platform you would understand the idea of personal freedom and liberty, the way you want racism dealt with is communistic/socialist and proven to fail, it must die through freedom & education, not laws.
Sorry but laws are necessary so that freedom isn't denied by racist, sexist, or intollerant of those that are different. Do you really think that "freedom & education" are enough? Come on, we're talking about humanity with all its imperfections. If freedom and education were enough we wouldn't need laws. We are a nation of laws. Why is that?
@ReduceGHGs You are a nation of laws because your government wants to give you a fine for everything possible and get their money grab. That much is obvious. and of course some laws are necessary, but not ones that give the government the power to control what people do on their own property, as long as it hurts no one. To say that a White Guy is "hurt" because a "blacks only" burger joint wont sell him a burger is just silly, do you want the government to put fines on "failure to share"?
@fistedsaxe I'm not in pain. I read the first part of your post, determined it was ridiculous and stopped reading. Laws are designed as procurement scam? LMFAO!
@ReduceGHGs Good tactic, keeps you from actually having to have a point, or a stance, or any knowledge. Kind like when your mom tells you to go to your room eh? lol Its cool, most people bitch out of arguments when there gonna loose, I wont hold it against ya, but just saying "I cant back up my view point with any type of useful points" also works, and you look like less a fool.
FOX=facist scum, Megyn kelly is a cheap whore and WHITE MAGGOT ,RACIST,S are faggots ,it,s logic,, No matter what color a beautiful woman is i get a fat a boner a hard on, Racist,s dont, see there gay shit jabbers
@tobiascam what do you mean allowing racism? do you think laws will stop racism or exacerbate it? occupation of the south by the north led to the Jim Crow laws. Dr. Paul's point is that we should have repealed Jim Crow laws, given black people equal protection under the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and refused to do business with people who discriminate. The feds wouldnt have misused the interstate commerce clause setting the precedent for another power grab down the line under that premise
There is a lot of anti-naacp and anti-ethnic organization people on youtube. I never considered these organizations racist but I guess everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
@KendrickJ2 ...whats your opinion of this particular viewpoint,you didn't say where you stand...And Yes,You can be anti-whatever,and say all kinds of racist and irrational things but when you get SLAPPED don't act surprised.
@tobiascam ...If you re-read my original comment, I do not consider ethnic organizations to be racist... which is why I'm confused with Maddow's viewpoint. However irrational Maddow may be on this issue, I wouldn't suggest anyone slapping her. Politically, I'm Libertarian, which means that slavery, government forced racism, today's drugs wars used to go after minorities(drug prohibition), gays not allowed to get married... all of these would not exist.
Now don't get me wrong... the civil rights era was a unique era(and the preceding 200 years). The government imposed racism and that was the primary issue... and, of course, because it was forced by the gov't, many regular individuals was taught to hate(who wouldn't hate naturally--naturally good people). But, in general, he was trying to say his position is that the gov't shouldn't interfere...
and a good example of how it isn't an issue, is current ethnic organizations. (Of course, you will always have that small group of people from every race that will always hate). Thomas Sowell was a famous economist(who I think will historically go down as one of the great economists). He was black so he touched issues regarding the communities... and he is more Libertarian and shows gov't policies either do not help or hurt.
No foreign wars, unless approved by Congress(basically rarely), no eminent domain for corporations(why should a business be able to take your property?), no lobbyists that pay off gov't Repubs and Dems for new laws that keep the corporatist businesses a monopoly. The individual is the greatest minority and everything should be done to make sure that the individual does not have their inherent rights of liberty taken away(beware, Repubs claim this, but don't actually do it)
You know the situation is fucked when Megyn Kelly sounds like the voice of reason in an argument...
HowDyaYouLikeMeNow 2 weeks ago
Am I racist for saying that the 30,000 dollars my friend got in welfare over the past five years should have been taken, repackaged into a free college program over the course of thirty six months and then redistributed for books and tuition.
Wouldnt that over time turn a drain on the tax payer and turn her into a productive tax paying member of society thus paying for itself many times over? And the odds of her children attaining the same or higher level of education increase as well?
sagequan 2 months ago
@HayZing
I think the entirety of your fallacious views can be summed up with five words, "the rich are laughable morons."
I rest my case.
emmit127 2 months ago
@HayZing
Good luck with that.
You can pretend the homeless are a new phenomenon despite their existence throughout history.
You can pretend these pretentious #ows nits are giving a coherent message, but we both know that is a bald faced lie. But if you think breakdown of Law and Social Order is the way to nirvana you are sadly mistaken and will eventually be dealt substantial setbacks from which you will not be able to recover. I stand with civil society and we will not long tolerate this.
maskedphrogg 3 months ago
@HayZing
No doofus, I was giving YOU advice.
Use Jergens next time. It won't leave your (ahem) member so raw
maskedphrogg 3 months ago
@HayZing
Ha!
Caught with your pants down eh.
tnx for the confirmation, wanker
maskedphrogg 3 months ago
@HayZing
Don't the calluses on your hands cause you discomfort while you wank?
maskedphrogg 3 months ago
@HayZing
Wrong Obongo. That's how it works in YOUR neighborhood as a direct result of gov interference in private matters. In the real world disparaging one's neighbors or potential customers gets one a quick ticket to bankruptcy and destitution. Maybe the force of Law is necessary to keep your behaviour civil. Without it, you would be on your own, rather lonely, but you would be able to let your inner demons loose. Consider it a favor.
maskedphrogg 3 months ago
this video is as fun as scratching my balls with sandpaper
m1n1maltec 3 months ago
watch?v=qqod16fhMPE
21stCenturyEconomy 4 months ago
Stossel's right. We fought for the right to be jerks as individuals if we choose. That's f'ing freedom. Govt should be fair and part of that is to ensure rights and not be in people's business. THE FREE MARKET WILL TAKE CARE OF ITSELF.
FavreianVengeance 4 months ago
@FavreianVengeance
Not even close.
Liberty is the freedom to do the best one can without the shackles or shams of gov impeding one's progress. You can be a jerk if you choose to your own detriment. THAT is how free markets work.
maskedphrogg 3 months ago
@maskedphrogg Well I think we kind of agree frankly. I'm tired of the government assuming that people are naturally so bad and that they need to control us like lemmings. That is not freedom.
FavreianVengeance 3 months ago
@FavreianVengeance
I don't see that. You focus on the "liberty" to act against one's own best interest. That is not quite the same thing. I fear what you hold against the gov is their inability or unwillingness to make decisions about social policy or individual behaviour that you agree with. I fear the gov making any such decisions at all.
maskedphrogg 3 months ago
@maskedphrogg No. I agree with that generally. I'm not into government legislating morality.
FavreianVengeance 3 months ago
@FavreianVengeance
Well, before I come on so bull headed someone labels me a Paulbot ;-) I'll just have to agree to agree.
I'm a Libertarian. I hold that the only legitimate use of gov, and it's inherent monopoly on violence, is to defend individuals from the application of force by others. My apologies if my earlier posts came off as combative. Sometimes I take purism to unintended extremes and don't recognize allies.
maskedphrogg 3 months ago
@maskedphrogg No worries. More and more I want the government out of things and I want to return to federalism. The government is no longer a power of the people entity although they do all this feel goodery bs to mask that they are taking control of people's lives. We need our individual liberties restored.
FavreianVengeance 3 months ago
You have turned to the darkside... your likesaber has become totally red from the ominous content of your video!
MadBagOfHorses 4 months ago
You obvioulsy didn't listen to anything Stossel said, guess I can go crash a black panthers party and that would go over real well right? People should be able to do what they wish on their own property so long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.
motter28218 4 months ago
The person who posted this is living in the past. People have the god given right to be racist. As long as they are not physically hurting anyone else, they have the right to be stupid and racist. No government has the right to come into a business and tell them "you can not be racist, you have to hire a certain type of people that you don't want to hire for YOUR business.
mortisgod 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What is your point?
histhespian 4 months ago
The day Sen. ron Paul - started question Federal reserve audit and accountability . now theyr cooking a bad image and bringing files which r irrelevant now.
Fox news or fraud news please take a break and get to know who is bill o reily - he is serving his corporate masters and brokers (govet officials).
rock143888 4 months ago
KKK members are infuriated that their town businesses have to provide services to everyone.
Their entire argument rests on slippery slope. The last I check, it was called a fallacy, but what does a cretin Teanuts knows about logical fallacies.
ninuxy 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ninuxy 'Their entire argument rests on slippery slope. The last I check, it was called a fallacy, ' Check again slippery slopes are only fallices when no mechanism is given and what is a teanut? It sounds like a type of biscuit.
666or999 4 months ago
@ninuxy
Logical fallacy? A damn sight more than you do.
maskedphrogg 3 months ago
@maskedphrogg What a repartee! Someone give frog here his lollipop back.
ninuxy 3 months ago
@maskedphrogg
See, you quickly affirm my point.
Anyone knows a damn sight more about logic and what is and is not a fallacy than you do.
You jumped on that slippery slope and fell into the pit.
Wallow in it now and be the pig you always wanted to be and thought you had to hide. Don't be afraid to show your true colors, or lack thereof.
maskedphrogg 3 months ago
This has got to be the most stupid video on planet earth. Thanks for setting a new low.
ecuadmail 5 months ago
WTF is this?? If a business chooses to not serve a person of specific race or religion, that is their decision! The government can't tell people who they are allowed to do business with! People, we don't NEED segregation laws anymore!! There is no blatant and violent racism in society now.
Hrtsniper159 5 months ago 3
Stossel made quite a few very valid and important points that have been completely ignored. For example ... the Jim Crow Laws. Government enforced segregation. Rather than just removing the government enforced segregation, they went the other way and instituted government enforced association. If they had simply removed the segregation laws, business would have gone integrated all on their own, or they would have gone out of business. As the tide turns, so does business.
HumbleWillis 5 months ago
He still got my vote: I am a minority
khamgarr206 5 months ago
private doesnt mean public
tomjamisonfrazier 5 months ago
Um, I love how none of the top rated posters here paid attention in history class. Not to mention you are not paying attention to the clip. Neither one of them is saying that its O.K to be racist or gender biased. What they are saying is, that as a private business, or whatever you should have the right to chose who works for you and what not. Because he had a point, you do not see all Black colleges allowing white students and so forth...I'm against racism period.
justice0218 5 months ago
END CIRCUMCISION!
gingowitch 5 months ago
Racism is legal it is not the business of Government, see the BLACK CAUCUS, SEE NEGRO COLLEGE FUND, freedom is the right not to do anything. U just don't get it. I have the right to be free from associating with dikes too. You don't think the Negro is racist then you live in another planet. Nonetheless a private business has the right to refuse anyone for any reason. FU congress the civil rights act should have be unconstitutional but our Judges are Douche bags.
usagill 5 months ago
how come whenever crappy liberals speak about pro-segregation movements they never mention malcolm x? He was also a leader of a pro segregation movement with pro-violence views. So why dont you tell the whole truth liberals? O I forgot you liberals aren't allowed to criticize anything minorities do, because that would be racist right? Liberals are so twisted up.
But for the record I am not against the civil rights act, it was necessary and I am a republican for full disclosure, could ya tell?
JoeTheRock7 6 months ago
Comment removed
HowDyaYouLikeMeNow 5 months ago
@JoeTheRock7 Couldn't tell at all, slick. You're just so Goddamned enlightened, we were blinded by the rays of light beaming out of your arse. How many liberals use Malcolm X as reference material? So fucking what if we don't criticise our own when they embarrass us. Shit, you tea baggers have kept your mouths shut about Palin, haven't you? Start throwing around a little "constructive criticism" on your own end before whining about the rest of us.
HowDyaYouLikeMeNow 5 months ago
This video was bad and you should feel bad.
sykop8ntballer 6 months ago
There might be good arguments against what Stossel is saying, but they are not in this video.
13lackLight 6 months ago
But it is okay to have a Black Congressional Caucus that does not allow a white congressman who represents a primarily black congressional district or ANY other races to be a part of it except for blacks. That is pure racism that is being allowed in our gov't. We will not over come racism while we have such things.
1bad26 6 months ago
@1bad26 Dude..it's okay to be racist if you are a minority...especially if you are black and were a former slave as we all know every white person today personally owned slaves and ran large cotton plantations.
jphill4 5 months ago
great vid. Racism sucks!
carsiotto 7 months ago
Omg this is the worst video on YT for sure. FAIL!
MorbidPh8 7 months ago
Yeah, let's just get rid of the freedom of association since associating with anyone in particular is discrimination!
GRX3000 8 months ago
Anyone stupid enough to use a childish word game (faux) can't be taken seriously as any sort of critical thinker.
niveknailgun 9 months ago
LIBERTY IS ALWAYS THE BEST ANSWER!! this has the bios of being controlled by the government which is the wrong bios! RON PAUL 2012!!!!!
0bamasmama 9 months ago
More idiotic Republicans need to get slapped like that more often!
RebelThoughts 10 months ago
@RebelThoughts You are the moron. It was you and your Democrat pals that were the biggest racists. Stossel supposrts free choice and you equate that with racism, like racists would all of the sudden be dominating the country and the economy. LOL no racist business would survive these days. You and your affirmative action... etc.. democrat racist policies that force us to see skin color first and foremost.
ThePelicans44 9 months ago
@ThePelicans44 You're an idiot.
WolfPackM98c 9 months ago
@WolfPackM98c You're an idiot.
ThePelicans44 9 months ago
Fugly Maddow
addderphor 11 months ago
John Stossel needs to be slapped by large wrestlers on a regular basis for his stupid comments regarding American Apartheid. These morons think the market is the answer to everything. No, mustache wearing dildo brain. Some businesses would have accomodated blacks but many others wouldn't so it was necessary for the government to step in and end this evil. There are plenty of countries you can move to where the government doesnt interfere with business, its called the Third World you idiot.
bigmoemiami 11 months ago
Stossel got bitch slapped - twice LOL!
p.s. He sued that guy into bankruptcy and the WWE for 10 million, he "settled" out of court for 6 million. 3 million per slap :)
TBaker1964 11 months ago 2
@TBaker1964 not true, he made a settlement for 425000 and he said later he regretted it because he believes lawsuits hurt everyone
clayvision 7 months ago
This is the most retarded video is have ever seen. You are an idiot!
gregor2968 11 months ago 27
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@gregor2968 "This is the most retarded video is have ever seen." Use correct english.What about this video is "retarded"?....I think stossel should be slapped for that view.
tobiascam 11 months ago
@tobiascam First of all, the production value were bloody appalling. My Grandma could do a better job of making a video than you. And she's dead! Secondly, if you are going to lecture me about correct English you must ensure that you use it as well. Have you read your description above? It's fucking unintelligible! Thirdly, whilst racism has no place in mordern society John Stossel is right. A person should be allowed to deny anyone access to their private property.
gregor2968 11 months ago
@gregor2968 Stossel, and yourself, are wrong. And idiots, at that.
WolfPackM98c 9 months ago
@tobiascam you are an Idiot!
pansch1138 6 months ago
@tobiascam You forgot the capital letter at the beginning of 'English' - perhaps you should have used it correctly.
phocjame 5 months ago
@tobiascam GOOD FOR YOU YOU CAN SPELL...YOU MUST BE WEARING BIG BOY PANTS NOW
TheShnitster 5 months ago
@tobiascam
What is retarded about this video?
The author apparently.
maskedphrogg 3 months ago
@tobiascam
what does using corret english have to do with a persons view of a subject.....this was a retarded video
girlcalledaish 3 months ago
i dont agree with stossel...but the slaps made it a retarded a video
girlcalledaish 3 months ago
Jim Crow laws represent GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE in interpersonal relationships. Freedom of association, no laws dictating what people can or cannot do. Jim Crow laws represent BIG GOVERNMENT who has too much power. The counter Civil Rights represents BIG GOVERNMENT reversing itself. Get it? Government is force and it does not have your best interest at heart. It falls victim to "special interests" who take the helm and drive us all into hell. Keep gov't small and limited, no Jim Crow law
Charlotte333 11 months ago
REALITY: The Jim Crow laws were state and local laws in the United States enacted between 1876 and 1965. They mandated de jure racial segregation in all public facilities, with a supposedly "separate but equal" status for black Americans. REALITY: The government had to change it's own laws. Government is FORCE. Don't blame the little people stuck in the middle! Governments have killed more people in the last 2,000 years than any other form of violence. Gov't world wide should be LIMITED.
Charlotte333 11 months ago 2
Watch me SLAP ReduceGHGs and educate him on how communism isn't cool.
fistedsaxe 1 year ago
WTF IS THIS GUY EVEN TALKING ABOUT??? IT WASN'T A LAW THAT BLACKS AND WHITE COULDN'T SIT AT THE SAME COUNTER
JBizzle93 1 year ago
@kristophera .
stossel and rand are indeed racists as they don't agree with The Civil Rights Act that outlawed major forms of discrimination against blacks and women, including racial segregation. ... at the workplace and by facilities that served the general public. Whether you like it or not the Act helps prevent discrimination. And yes, you are still entitled to property provided the use of it doesn't violate this necessary protection. Private, non-public accommodating use is excluded.
qsteveens 1 year ago
@qsteveens you are an accusatory Hack for claiming those 2 men which I'm sure you don't personally know are racist, Obviously from your opinion on this, you must be Fascist, Probably Nazi descendant. ...lol..... see how that works, I just claim something about someone I don't know.,,,, and now somebody might think it true, not agreeing with any act does not make you racist, your world is pea sized, your stating all Punks are racist because they don't believe in statutes, acts or bills, educate..
fistedsaxe 1 year ago
@fistedsaxe
qsteveens = ReduceGHGs
Hack? Nah.
Yes, I certainly label Rand a racist. His wanting to reverse the Civil Rights Act makes it clear where he stands. It okay with him if we have "Whites Only" resaurants again. You too?
I've heard him trying to squirm out of earlier statements he's made. Sorry, too late.
He's also a global warming denier despite the overwhelming evidence. No thanks rand paul. We have enough regressive policy makers. Time for him to go already!
ReduceGHGs 1 year ago
@ReduceGHGs Obviously you don't believe in property ownership as you want the government to make decisions about what people are allowed to do on their own property, I personally think if there was a whites only restaurant it would fail because it wouldn't receive enough business after cutting out half its market, not to mention all the white people who wouldn't eat there (like me) based on the knowledge that it is a racist establishment, think with your head not your heart,
fistedsaxe 1 year ago
@ReduceGHGs its seems your more speaking on peoples viewpoints that you deem racist primarily because you fail to see the reasoning behind there point of view, so you create one that makes sense to you,. which is obviously the racism card. maybe if you read the republican platform you would understand the idea of personal freedom and liberty, the way you want racism dealt with is communistic/socialist and proven to fail, it must die through freedom & education, not laws.
fistedsaxe 1 year ago
@fistedsaxe I recommend not guessing what I see.
Sorry but laws are necessary so that freedom isn't denied by racist, sexist, or intollerant of those that are different. Do you really think that "freedom & education" are enough? Come on, we're talking about humanity with all its imperfections. If freedom and education were enough we wouldn't need laws. We are a nation of laws. Why is that?
ReduceGHGs 1 year ago
@ReduceGHGs You are a nation of laws because your government wants to give you a fine for everything possible and get their money grab. That much is obvious. and of course some laws are necessary, but not ones that give the government the power to control what people do on their own property, as long as it hurts no one. To say that a White Guy is "hurt" because a "blacks only" burger joint wont sell him a burger is just silly, do you want the government to put fines on "failure to share"?
fistedsaxe 1 year ago
@fistedsaxe Our laws are for a money scam? Lol! I need not read further. Thanks for nothing.
ReduceGHGs 1 year ago
@ReduceGHGs Hurts doesn't it?
fistedsaxe 1 year ago
@fistedsaxe I'm not in pain. I read the first part of your post, determined it was ridiculous and stopped reading. Laws are designed as procurement scam? LMFAO!
ReduceGHGs 1 year ago
@ReduceGHGs Good tactic, keeps you from actually having to have a point, or a stance, or any knowledge. Kind like when your mom tells you to go to your room eh? lol Its cool, most people bitch out of arguments when there gonna loose, I wont hold it against ya, but just saying "I cant back up my view point with any type of useful points" also works, and you look like less a fool.
fistedsaxe 1 year ago
@fistedsaxe
Okay kiddy.
ReduceGHGs 1 year ago
@ReduceGHGs And check mate,!!!!! you were raped by fistedsaxe, tell your friends, favorite me!!! ttys!!!
fistedsaxe 1 year ago
Smack stossel again! I loved it when he got knocked off his feet. What a racist fool! That goes for rand paul too!
qsteveens 1 year ago
Megyn Kelly is fucking hot..bang the last breath out of her
hougp53 1 year ago
Megyn Kelly is fucking out...bang the last breath out of her....
hougp53 1 year ago
FOX=facist scum, Megyn kelly is a cheap whore and WHITE MAGGOT ,RACIST,S are faggots ,it,s logic,, No matter what color a beautiful woman is i get a fat a boner a hard on, Racist,s dont, see there gay shit jabbers
invaliduser1000 1 year ago
Free association, Stosel is right. Activists sit ins got private stores to change before the Fed laws.
Government is not good just power.
chewbaca1989 1 year ago
@chewbaca1989 wrong. money in government is wrong, not government. We created the greatest nation ever with our government. Think about it.
MaudsPas 1 year ago
Free association, Stosel is right.
chewbaca1989 1 year ago
stossel and rand are right on!
marshall3win 1 year ago
Wow. ClusterFUX went rough. The blonde bitch went fair and balanced on them DOH!
816cameron 1 year ago
He's a Jew and had nothing to do with the Civil War.
If blacks had brains they would own their own and not depending on whitey. God you are cursed.
yak6ex 1 year ago
@yak6ex own thier own ? what do u mean?and just because he's a jew that doesn't excuse these remarks about allowing racism
tobiascam 1 year ago
Yup, and you should put a chip into everyones had just to make sure they don't commit any thought crime
LordVigeous666999 1 year ago
@tobiascam what do you mean allowing racism? do you think laws will stop racism or exacerbate it? occupation of the south by the north led to the Jim Crow laws. Dr. Paul's point is that we should have repealed Jim Crow laws, given black people equal protection under the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and refused to do business with people who discriminate. The feds wouldnt have misused the interstate commerce clause setting the precedent for another power grab down the line under that premise
snappa52 9 months ago 8
@yak6ex B I G O T
bonchidude 1 year ago
There is a lot of anti-naacp and anti-ethnic organization people on youtube. I never considered these organizations racist but I guess everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
KendrickJ2 1 year ago
@KendrickJ2 ...whats your opinion of this particular viewpoint,you didn't say where you stand...And Yes,You can be anti-whatever,and say all kinds of racist and irrational things but when you get SLAPPED don't act surprised.
tobiascam 1 year ago
@tobiascam ...If you re-read my original comment, I do not consider ethnic organizations to be racist... which is why I'm confused with Maddow's viewpoint. However irrational Maddow may be on this issue, I wouldn't suggest anyone slapping her. Politically, I'm Libertarian, which means that slavery, government forced racism, today's drugs wars used to go after minorities(drug prohibition), gays not allowed to get married... all of these would not exist.
KendrickJ2 1 year ago
@KendrickJ2 not slapping her ,she's kool wit me..I'm talking about people with racist viewpoints
tobiascam 1 year ago
@tobiascam
Oops, I misunderstood. haha. I thought you agreed that ethnic organizations should not be shut down.
KendrickJ2 1 year ago
@tobiascam
Now don't get me wrong... the civil rights era was a unique era(and the preceding 200 years). The government imposed racism and that was the primary issue... and, of course, because it was forced by the gov't, many regular individuals was taught to hate(who wouldn't hate naturally--naturally good people). But, in general, he was trying to say his position is that the gov't shouldn't interfere...
KendrickJ2 1 year ago
@tobiascam
and a good example of how it isn't an issue, is current ethnic organizations. (Of course, you will always have that small group of people from every race that will always hate). Thomas Sowell was a famous economist(who I think will historically go down as one of the great economists). He was black so he touched issues regarding the communities... and he is more Libertarian and shows gov't policies either do not help or hurt.
KendrickJ2 1 year ago
@KendrickJ2 this is a great comments,
fistedsaxe 1 year ago
@tobiascam
No foreign wars, unless approved by Congress(basically rarely), no eminent domain for corporations(why should a business be able to take your property?), no lobbyists that pay off gov't Repubs and Dems for new laws that keep the corporatist businesses a monopoly. The individual is the greatest minority and everything should be done to make sure that the individual does not have their inherent rights of liberty taken away(beware, Repubs claim this, but don't actually do it)
KendrickJ2 1 year ago
You be killing them lol...
dportis47 1 year ago
@dportis47 thanks...they alll should be smacked for these racist points of view. subscribe to 22reepicheep too
tobiascam 1 year ago