Belive it or not Free energy is real,But the Oil companies want these technologies unknown to the masses,Check this free energy magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
@Helioechidna Yes I do, can't give you to much information but i can tell you that harvard has taken all the prototypes and solvents that wally left when he passed away. (My family hasent even given me any information) so hopefully good things to come...
to get more power we simply need to increase the scale. If you've got 10lbs of liquid in a container on the end of a 10' pole, you have something to make power with.
Seems to me that the way to get more practical power out of these wheels is to incorporate a valve, either pressure or mechanically tripped, that allows pressure to build before opening combined with applying heat over a greater range of the cycle. This might allow for larger pipe diameter and quicker transfer of the fluid. Obviously, these wheels are pretty much pointless unless they are solar powered.
Is that stepper on the frame wired up as an electrical generator? (I've tried it before... it generated enough power to light, then SMOKE, an LED plugged into the header pins on the stepper after I twisted the shaft. Teehee... that was satisfying.)
I came upon the dunking bird and made my own minto wheel. ever wrote a letter to popular science. the point is that the patents go back 100 + years. great concept.
Somebody know about the efficiency of this system?Is it near the stirlin engine, or its efficiency is near 2%?Have you ever measured the heat input and the power output?
Hi Tommy; You are 100% correct. Most people loss sight of exactly how heat engines work. It is not only the differance in temp. BUT how fast you can change it. Ditch the glob. Replace with a radiater system and cool the top as you heat the bottom. Should run 3 or 4 times faster.
Brilliant dude. Now make another 4 of those babies and line them up on the same axle slightly out of phase with a bigger heat tray and you'll have very smooth motion.
Then build a 6 foot in diameter version and you'll be able to run your house off of it.
Good suggestion. But I wonder about the maximum wheel diameter that will work. Based on some calculations I did for a dichloromethane working fluid (not what Helioechidna uses), and assuming approximately the same temperature difference used here, I estimated a maximum diameter of about 5 or 6 feet. If we try for much larger diameters, say 30 feet, the vapor pressure will not lift the liquid all the way to the top (unless we use a much higher temperature.
So if we cannot expand in diameter size, then perhaps sideways would be the way to go.... so more individual wheels on the same axis? Almost like a multiple cylinder ICE engine? Increased torque in the same diameter?
Yes, that seems like the most logical approach -- use multiple wheels with the same diameter of about 3-6 feet. This has several advantages compared to using only one very large wheel: smoother power, modular system allows wheels to be added at will, easier to build small wheels than large ones, and the structure has a lower ceiling and smaller footprint. There are probably additional advantages I haven't thought of. Mother Earth's wheel was way to big.
Fluid can't be disclosed until patent process is satisfied that my modification is novel.
Please come over to the group named in the panel describing the video. We can discuss the principles in more depth. The group would be very interested in your memories and recollections of your father's devices. Do you continue his work?
This device is a novel type of *heat engine*. It converts thermal energy into mechanical energy (via flow across a temperature difference). I would say that the most closely related well-known heat engine is the Stirling engine.
Certainly not novel from a historical point of view. The earliest patents for a device like this are over 120 years old. Novel can mean interesting and it's simplicity has a certain novelty when compared to other heat engines.
Understood -- the basic design has been known for over 100 years (predates Wallace Minto). But I call it novel in the sense that most people have not heard of it. Side-note: I saw a version tested on a rerun of the MythBusters TV show (see the "Fan of Death/Free Energy" episode). They did a poor job and concluded it isn't worth pursuing (theirs didn't even do 1 RPM). They need to know of your much better designs.
they used propane cylinders as their receivers, and condensation as the method of moving the propane from top to bottom. This is the grand error of their version. Dip tubes are critical. Moving fluid is the answer to the effectiveness of this device, not condensing the vapors. The vapors do the work of moving the liquid!
This technology still has lots of room for improvement. Time will tell whether or not it finds practical applications. The material are inexpensive, and this type of heat engine can operate off of modest temperature differences, so it is definitely worthy of research.
we need a volcano to test out real world use ^_^
odiousominious 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Belive it or not Free energy is real,But the Oil companies want these technologies unknown to the masses,Check this free energy magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
lavernedi 1 year ago
VERY well built unit
Simple and effective
1BustedMyth 1 year ago
My great grandfather invented this, my name is Darien MINTO fedro =D
ffdarien123 1 year ago
@ffdarien123 As stated earlier, this wheel is not a novel invention. However, the solvent used may just be, so pending further investigations...
Helioechidna 1 year ago
@Helioechidna Yes I do, can't give you to much information but i can tell you that harvard has taken all the prototypes and solvents that wally left when he passed away. (My family hasent even given me any information) so hopefully good things to come...
ffdarien123 1 year ago
I Like this!
TheTempestSpark 2 years ago
to get more power we simply need to increase the scale. If you've got 10lbs of liquid in a container on the end of a 10' pole, you have something to make power with.
philosothink 2 years ago
that's pretty cool!
bentleius 2 years ago
Perhaps having 2 wheels on the axle instead of one would make the movement more' fluid'.
GhostofRazors 2 years ago 4
Seems to me that the way to get more practical power out of these wheels is to incorporate a valve, either pressure or mechanically tripped, that allows pressure to build before opening combined with applying heat over a greater range of the cycle. This might allow for larger pipe diameter and quicker transfer of the fluid. Obviously, these wheels are pretty much pointless unless they are solar powered.
boc234 2 years ago
haha. I realy like this. Could add some coloured die to the wheel. or maybee even add another wheel slightly Offset to get a smoother rotation.
MrWombatPPC 2 years ago
Great Job!
t1449947 3 years ago
Is that stepper on the frame wired up as an electrical generator? (I've tried it before... it generated enough power to light, then SMOKE, an LED plugged into the header pins on the stepper after I twisted the shaft. Teehee... that was satisfying.)
hyvahyva 3 years ago
the music mad ethis a whole lot more interesting. Even more so than getting a gravity wheel to actually work. good job
McConsumer 3 years ago
excellent job, im interested to build one, pls show us how...
KONGNO2000 3 years ago
It might not be strong it does look incredibly cool.
Time to bring in the mirrors Archimedes. :-)
gabydewilde 4 years ago
same thing happened to me 35 years ago.
I came upon the dunking bird and made my own minto wheel. ever wrote a letter to popular science. the point is that the patents go back 100 + years. great concept.
josephdupont 4 years ago
Somebody know about the efficiency of this system?Is it near the stirlin engine, or its efficiency is near 2%?Have you ever measured the heat input and the power output?
steam1981 4 years ago
OK, have just watched this first video after seeing the later video.
Am intuitively convinced that the action will be doubled by partial (at least) flocking of the glass surfaces.
By that means you gain a tremendous evaporative cooling area.
Your warm water bath won't even require heating in order to gain basic motion.
By flocking you will reduce the required temp-differential.
Am sure of this--or shoot me if a trial proves me wrong about =your= invention.
HartfordTommy 4 years ago
Hi Tommy; You are 100% correct. Most people loss sight of exactly how heat engines work. It is not only the differance in temp. BUT how fast you can change it. Ditch the glob. Replace with a radiater system and cool the top as you heat the bottom. Should run 3 or 4 times faster.
RHEAD100 4 years ago
Brilliant dude. Now make another 4 of those babies and line them up on the same axle slightly out of phase with a bigger heat tray and you'll have very smooth motion.
Then build a 6 foot in diameter version and you'll be able to run your house off of it.
greatestdirectorisme 4 years ago
Good suggestion. But I wonder about the maximum wheel diameter that will work. Based on some calculations I did for a dichloromethane working fluid (not what Helioechidna uses), and assuming approximately the same temperature difference used here, I estimated a maximum diameter of about 5 or 6 feet. If we try for much larger diameters, say 30 feet, the vapor pressure will not lift the liquid all the way to the top (unless we use a much higher temperature.
EinsteinVonRembrandt 4 years ago
So if we cannot expand in diameter size, then perhaps sideways would be the way to go.... so more individual wheels on the same axis? Almost like a multiple cylinder ICE engine? Increased torque in the same diameter?
greatestdirectorisme 4 years ago
Yes, that seems like the most logical approach -- use multiple wheels with the same diameter of about 3-6 feet. This has several advantages compared to using only one very large wheel: smoother power, modular system allows wheels to be added at will, easier to build small wheels than large ones, and the structure has a lower ceiling and smaller footprint. There are probably additional advantages I haven't thought of. Mother Earth's wheel was way to big.
EinsteinVonRembrandt 4 years ago
They also used too narrow of a fluid transfer pipe from one receiver to the next. I think their narrow pipes limited their RPM....
philosothink 2 years ago
looks sucky
cooltheory 4 years ago
Yikes...accidently deleted last post trying to reply...my bad!
Helioechidna 4 years ago
My name is Wallace K Minto my father is the inventor of the Minto Wheel.What is your working fluid?
wallaceminto 4 years ago
Fluid can't be disclosed until patent process is satisfied that my modification is novel.
Please come over to the group named in the panel describing the video. We can discuss the principles in more depth. The group would be very interested in your memories and recollections of your father's devices. Do you continue his work?
Helioechidna 4 years ago
What is it for? Energy is conserve. Candles obtains heat energy to spin the wheel.
kibeomer 4 years ago
This device is a novel type of *heat engine*. It converts thermal energy into mechanical energy (via flow across a temperature difference). I would say that the most closely related well-known heat engine is the Stirling engine.
EinsteinVonRembrandt 4 years ago
Certainly not novel from a historical point of view. The earliest patents for a device like this are over 120 years old. Novel can mean interesting and it's simplicity has a certain novelty when compared to other heat engines.
Helioechidna 4 years ago
Understood -- the basic design has been known for over 100 years (predates Wallace Minto). But I call it novel in the sense that most people have not heard of it. Side-note: I saw a version tested on a rerun of the MythBusters TV show (see the "Fan of Death/Free Energy" episode). They did a poor job and concluded it isn't worth pursuing (theirs didn't even do 1 RPM). They need to know of your much better designs.
EinsteinVonRembrandt 4 years ago
"They did a poor job".
You missed the point of the message. It was the whole point to make you think just that.
Sad ain't it?
gabydewilde 4 years ago
they used propane cylinders as their receivers, and condensation as the method of moving the propane from top to bottom. This is the grand error of their version. Dip tubes are critical. Moving fluid is the answer to the effectiveness of this device, not condensing the vapors. The vapors do the work of moving the liquid!
philosothink 2 years ago
If you like this wheel, please see the YouTube video of Helioechidna's newest wheel! (click on "More from this user")
tech.groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/MintoWheel
EinsteinVonRembrandt 4 years ago
Great wheel !
Please come to overunity dot com to discuss your wheel !
Many thanks. Regards, Stefan. ( admin of overunity dot com )
hartiberlin 4 years ago
Which material is used in this engine?
I like it very much!
simi112 4 years ago
5 stars for FANTASY , zero stars for utility ;-)
mptrax 4 years ago
what is the music???
carbon143 4 years ago
For more information about this and related heat engines, please visit the MintoWheel Yahoo group on the web. Replace "-dot-" with .
tech-dot-groups-dot-yahoo-dot-com/group/MintoWheel/
EinsteinVonRembrandt 4 years ago
Nice very good it's a good thermodynamic principe
like stirling motor...impressive!
have you some plans of your device!?
gilbondfac 4 years ago
Very interesting. What is the working fluid?
BHA2007 4 years ago
This is cool.
What material did u use to make the tubes??
RefrigerationEng 4 years ago
hey, whats the song used in this video?
Kahunaz 4 years ago
The track: 'Pressure', Lemon 8
Helioechidna 4 years ago
Very Cool!! Very impressive indeed.
Discorporate 4 years ago
BRAVO !
Nic
nicolaienvlad 4 years ago
....like any model powered by two small alcohol burners, but scalable.
The large ones are still very efficient at converting small temperature difference to mechanical energy.
Is this the very first example of rivalry from the Stirling camp?
Helioechidna 4 years ago
An interesting example of a simple heat engine. However it is hardly a power producing machine of any consequence.
Stirlingeng 4 years ago
This technology still has lots of room for improvement. Time will tell whether or not it finds practical applications. The material are inexpensive, and this type of heat engine can operate off of modest temperature differences, so it is definitely worthy of research.
EinsteinVonRembrandt 4 years ago
First let me say I am impressed.
This is the only one I have seen in action.
kbs2244 4 years ago