I don't really understand how this works. To see the "ball" of light moving, doesn't that light have to travel into the bottle, and then be scattered, and travel all the way to the camera? Since the camera is farther away than the length of the bottle, how does this work?
@TheAlebandro by the time the light hits the camera, the pulse will have moved on through the bottle, but this won't affect the image the camera sees, it just means the camera is recording it a fraction of a second after it happened.
It's a very short laser beam. When you 'see' the beam of light you are seeing the light reflected off particles in the air. So a very short beam of light is fired through the bottle, is reflected off particles, and refracts a bit through the bottle creating a lovely light show. :)
i really don't think anyone really understands what this video is. wow i waited my whole life to see this. i allways wondered what light really looked like. and here it is. all i can say is wow .. please watch. its amazing
@enablado Naw dude, you aren't reading the description right. It's a trillion FPS, but filmed a whole bunch of times times, then using measurement software and what not they take frames from the many, many recordings made at 1 trill fps and compile it into a 60 (or less) FPS video that's 3 minutes long.
@AlexSrspb : the bottle is filled with a liquid (water) and the "light effects" are light's refractions. I wonder why we don't see that delayed, though, given the fps at which this was taken.
@AlexSrspb if i understand your question, i think its that as the light is scattered by the water (the only reason it is visible from the side) some of it is reflected off the side of the bottle. Either that or something to do with the way the light hits the camera lens.
@LeoMRogers Look closely at 45 seconds. How can the light to pass different distances: from the middle of the bottle to the bottom of it; (reflection from the bottom) and from the middle of the bottle: (reflection from the water) and then sync to get into the lens of the camera?
The light (beam) moves from left to right. This is a short pulse. This is not a continuous emission of light, means - reflection beam can not be "longer" than the pulse beam.
From what I gather with my very limited knowledge about science is that what you see in the video is NOT a direct recording of an actual lightbeam, but a VISUALIZATION based on raw data.
Why is it that fuckwits can even find videos like these? If you're stupid enough to think this is fake, how did you even think to search for this video? You're an idiot in the first place.
There should be a page before you reach this one that reads "NO RETARDS PAST THIS POINT, JUST SCIENCE" in bold size 72 font.
@fanman320 That would several take life spans to watch, assuming the car accident takes a few tenths of a second. With this camera everything would look still, the car is touching the wall but nothing happens.
I don't think people grasp how slow motion this thing really is, this camera literally slows things down several million times more then the camera that the discovery channel use to capture things in slow motions.
The German BND is the renamed 3rd Reich GESTAPO.The BND had organized the delegate Scheuermann of our county to visit or home.To allow him to personally experience how my brother and our parents had been tortured.The BND continued to torture my brother.He was assassinated on July 11th2009.Half a year after the assassination of my brother the CDU delegate Mappus from our district town Pforzheim was made prime minister of the German land of Baden Würtemberg
@wwwtotalitaerde Please ignore this idiot. Martin Bott is suffering from a psychosis that makes him believe the government is after him, controlling minds everywhere etc. >_> His allegedly murdered brother even went to court against him because he didn’t want him to use his name for that nonsense. Now he sticks to defaming my country in Youtube videos.
Why not arrange some mirrors inside a big transparent box filled with some sort of gas (so that it's visible). Then fire the LAZORZ and watch the beam of power bounce around the thing like motherfucker. Do something spectacular, you assholes. Throw some prisms in as well.
@patchinko69 I hope you are intentionally being moronic. But just in case...
These are not second long samples, they are about a nano second, which is how long it takes light to travel about a foot (see how that works?). So divide your numbers by one billion (the number of nanoseconds in one second) and that is how much data is actually required.
If they were a full second then you'd be watching the light travel to the moon, and the full video would take about 40 years to watch.
Читаем Игоря Иванова и понимаем, что заявленная "съемка со скоростью триллион кадров в секунду" - чушь. igorivanov.blogspot.com/2011/12/trillion-fps.html
So MIT can afford state of the art bleeding edge technology that can slow down the fastest particles in the world to allow viewing, but they can't afford the royalties to better music? If you're going to spend tens of millions of dollars producing a video, atleast spend the extra 200$ and get some decent music. Amiright?
@nickpoinier1 the camera isn't directly between the bottle and the table, so a photon travelling from one to another wouldn't enter the camera, unless it took a detour
@bray987 this is amazing because this camera can a) capture 1 trillionth of a second and b) combine it with other frames from identical actions into one single series of sequential video.
@hfalc this camera doesn't truly capture 1 trillion FPS. It captures frames that are 1 trillionth of a second, then combines them from several samplings over several minutes to create a whole. To get one second of video, it would capture 1 trillion frames but it would be from many instances of the same action. What you are seeing in the combination of many tiny pieces of many laser pulses.
@bfriar It figures. Otherwise, at normal frame rate of 30 fps it would take 33,333,333,333 seconds to watch a second of recorded video. This might have it's uses in science. But still it is a cheat. It does not show the propagation of a light beam. But a sequence of stills taken from many bursts of light and at different points of it's trajectory. It is cool to watch anyway.
@bray987 Pro tip: Light travels 7 times around the world in a second (about 300 000km/s). In the video you can see it travelling distances that are measured in CENTIMETERS (0.00001km).
The 2 liter bottle is a foot in length, it took the pulse 14 seconds to go from the bottom to top of the bottle.
Light travels about 186,000 miles per second, that is 982,080,000 feet per second. Multiply that by 14, then divide to minutes, hours, days, and years.
So to watch a second of real time slowed down this much, it would take you about 436 years to watch. Rough estimate since that is not exact light speed or exactly 14 seconds, but you get the gist.
From what i read of it recently the neutrino thing is most likely an "error" related to the satellite used as the single clock of the experiment to counter "relativity" effects. Using different clocks would not be accurate at all so they had no choice. But since the earth move (so does the satellite) and spin, it introduce "incertainty" to an insane amount of parameters. So long story short, in the end this might only prove Einstein theory once again instead of discredit it.
At first, I thought this was AMAZING, but then I read the description. It's not actually filming the movement of light, but it's taking millions of observations of different times. Still pretty cool, but nowhere as cool as I thought...
I don't know, it seems to me like it's the same principle as normal recording since you can decently say that all events (different flashes) are the exact same (at our scale... we cannot possibly see any difference ).
@linkmandrew Man, it's AMAZING. Just to say, the process of capturing color images is more complex than b&w pic, and even though b&w is closest to reallity. Ppl would just say the opposit. In this case, the method can be repeated several times, without meaning any loose to the experiment. It's a view from a macro-universe.
@linkmandrew Man, I think the principle of filming is to capture lots of consecutive frames of the scene. Every camera works this way, isn't it? The great thing about this one is that it can capture 1 trillion frames per second, way more than the regular ones.
On September 22, 2011, a paper[73] from the OPERA Collaboration indicated detection of 17-GeV and 28-GeV muon neutrinos, sent 730 kilometers (454 miles) from CERN near Geneva, Switzerland to the Gran Sasso National Laboratory in Italy, traveling faster than light by a factor of 2.48×10−5 (approximately 1 in 40,322.58), a statistic with 6.0-sigma significance.[74] On 18 November 2011, a second followup experiment by OPERA scientists confirmed their initial results.[75][76]
@acolon001 & @vanHillQ, why don't you explain what you understand, this is still a fake to me, may be you two should understand first before saying i'm ridicule myself
So am I understanding this right? They flash an instance of light toward the bottom of the bottle and we're watching the light travel across the bottle?
@boazn8 Exactly, But it can't be taken one shot at a time. they can only take one row of pixels per shot and they combine each video into this complete aspect ratio movie.
i can't believe so many people just believe this BS, it's a fake. It's just a 3D rendered animation, they can't even make a good fake 3D rendered animation, check the light refraction reflected on the table, how come the refraction reflection on the table appear the same time as main light reflection, infact the refraction displayed further right from the main, but still displayed at the same time. c'mon guys, we all learn basic physic at high school or college. shame on MIT for pulling this BS
@izmanq Boy, you're trolling around a bunch of these videos trying your very best to convince people it's fake, when it is undeniably a scientific fact. Not to mention the very theory of this type of camera is completely solid and sound.
Apparently you're physics department is/was a complete failure if they didn't teach you the very basics of physics.
How come if this is a particle of light it have a light reflection? Isn't the light reflected part of this particle? Shouldn't we see the light moving towards the reflecting surface too? I call shenanigans!
@joseamirandavelez read the info genius... "However, due to very short exposure times (roughly one trillionth of a second) and a narrow field of view of the camera, the video is captured over several minutes by repeated and periodic sampling."
@FearInTheDeep Not if the video is only 1/10000000000000 of a second (one femtosecond) in length. That's *light* you're seeing travel across there, so it's the time light takes to travel the .5 meters or so we see in the video. That's a short time. Youtube can only display 24 frames per second like any other video, and your computer's screen is probably only 60Hz, but they've taken so many frames (essentially pictures) that they can slow it down and present it here.
What would you rather see? One second filmed at this speed takes over a thousand YEARS to play back... anything 'cool', such as explosions etc... would take longer than your lifetime to watch. Light is about the only thing fast enough to visualise with this.
Also, this technique requires a repeatable even to be filmed many times so that the camera can pick up a narrow view and stitch them together into a full frame. So only stuff like light pulses which can be set off identically again and again, can be filmed.
This is the fastest particle in the universe, and to manage to make it look this slow, truly unbelievable. Just contemplate the fact that nothing in this universe is faster than that light pulse. Wow
@Mycha31@michalchik from what i've read, it's already been proven that neutrino is faster than light. they've been testing for months and months for faults, but there has been none.
@Lzibbah It doesn't matter that one group has been testing it for months and months. Their results are interesting, but you need the same data to be replicated by SEVERAL groups. I'm not saying it's impossible that neutrinos can be FTL. I'm just saying the jury is still out; we just need to wait for other groups to corroborate their results.
@Lzibbah Unproven, probably experimental error. they are still trying to get the bugs worked it. It is certain that some neutrinos go slower than light.
It wasn't found to be a "miscalculation". Lots of scientists went into an uproar about the neutron being faster. So they are going back and re-testing everything all the scientists and theorist are saying they did wrong. and the results are still showing the neutron being faster. So... no I am not wrong. Nice try though. ;)
@islumbum Both of you idiots are wrong. The findings won't hold weight until all possible errors can be calculated out. The biggest being the clocks both labs use, even a tiny discrepancy could easily grant the neutrinos the 60 they measured. Being as though the clocks aren't synchronized with eachother that's very probable.
I don't really understand how this works. To see the "ball" of light moving, doesn't that light have to travel into the bottle, and then be scattered, and travel all the way to the camera? Since the camera is farther away than the length of the bottle, how does this work?
TheAlebandro 1 week ago
@TheAlebandro by the time the light hits the camera, the pulse will have moved on through the bottle, but this won't affect the image the camera sees, it just means the camera is recording it a fraction of a second after it happened.
LeoMRogers 6 days ago
@TheAlebandro
It's a very short laser beam. When you 'see' the beam of light you are seeing the light reflected off particles in the air. So a very short beam of light is fired through the bottle, is reflected off particles, and refracts a bit through the bottle creating a lovely light show. :)
muffin8or 6 days ago
wow. that is just so cool Einstein would have a hard on...... wow LIGHT MOVING
LordDevilman666 1 week ago
i really don't think anyone really understands what this video is. wow i waited my whole life to see this. i allways wondered what light really looked like. and here it is. all i can say is wow .. please watch. its amazing
LordDevilman666 1 week ago
why are the colours so off?
TunioMir 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Would you record on video the two facing photons or photon influence on a continuous laser beam?
TheDenall 2 weeks ago
Just saw this again and it's still mind boggling. Even the implications of this research are still beyond our imaginitive grasp.
fokGoogol 3 weeks ago
How long it takes to process a trillon fps with the actual computers?. It is hard to belive that there are a trilion fps.
enablado 4 weeks ago
@enablado Naw dude, you aren't reading the description right. It's a trillion FPS, but filmed a whole bunch of times times, then using measurement software and what not they take frames from the many, many recordings made at 1 trill fps and compile it into a 60 (or less) FPS video that's 3 minutes long.
PerfectChaosZeta 1 week ago
How to explain the "tail light" towards the source still some time after the passage of the beam a specific location?
AlexSrspb 1 month ago
@AlexSrspb : the bottle is filled with a liquid (water) and the "light effects" are light's refractions. I wonder why we don't see that delayed, though, given the fps at which this was taken.
fokGoogol 3 weeks ago
@AlexSrspb if i understand your question, i think its that as the light is scattered by the water (the only reason it is visible from the side) some of it is reflected off the side of the bottle. Either that or something to do with the way the light hits the camera lens.
LeoMRogers 1 week ago
@LeoMRogers Look closely at 45 seconds. How can the light to pass different distances: from the middle of the bottle to the bottom of it; (reflection from the bottom) and from the middle of the bottle: (reflection from the water) and then sync to get into the lens of the camera?
The light (beam) moves from left to right. This is a short pulse. This is not a continuous emission of light, means - reflection beam can not be "longer" than the pulse beam.
(Sorry for my english)
AlexSrspb 6 days ago
@AlexSrspb I think what you are describing is due to the changning shape of the bottle. But if it isnt that, then i have no idea.
LeoMRogers 6 days ago
Coca-Cola!
EllidanX 1 month ago
Fckin advertisement video, nothing else. ;)
Coca Cola is a very unhealthy and expensive junk drink.
Tetsuoha 1 month ago
32 клоуна не поняло что это такое ))))
411Taker 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@411Taker Расскажите, я не понял, например.
TheDenall 2 weeks ago
Coca Cola approves this video.
zerazera95 1 month ago 2
From what I gather with my very limited knowledge about science is that what you see in the video is NOT a direct recording of an actual lightbeam, but a VISUALIZATION based on raw data.
kicsiqki 1 month ago
Would you record on video the two facing photons or photon influence on a continuous laser beam?
TheDenall 1 month ago
awesome
nast16 1 month ago
they couldn't remove the stupid wrapper?
iloveconcord 1 month ago
FAKE!
surfaok 1 month ago
I still made your mom orgasm faster
harrysmyhomeboy 1 month ago
it is divinely beautiful!
YUSUFLEKTAMAZAN 1 month ago
Damn, Coca Cola must have paid these guys a bundle
Zantaer 1 month ago
They could use this technology to film particle collisions in the LHC or something...
nielzdg 1 month ago
Why is it that fuckwits can even find videos like these? If you're stupid enough to think this is fake, how did you even think to search for this video? You're an idiot in the first place.
There should be a page before you reach this one that reads "NO RETARDS PAST THIS POINT, JUST SCIENCE" in bold size 72 font.
DJBerserk 1 month ago
please do some research ..before you guys post negative remarks..
sweetkellymay 1 month ago
Hello! May i download this videos in better quality?
TheDenall 1 month ago
New coca-cola ad.
GodGURken 1 month ago
Wow. Can we capture the spark of life? I would like to see an atomic bomb explode at this speed...
Subsonicwaves 1 month ago
What's the name of this music in the intro
grybok1ng 2 months ago
What is the name of this audio track? What music is this in the beginning
grybok1ng 2 months ago
you need to run a car in the wall (not with you inside it) and capture it with that camera
fanman320 2 months ago
@fanman320 That would several take life spans to watch, assuming the car accident takes a few tenths of a second. With this camera everything would look still, the car is touching the wall but nothing happens.
I don't think people grasp how slow motion this thing really is, this camera literally slows things down several million times more then the camera that the discovery channel use to capture things in slow motions.
Inabj2 1 month ago
PRODUCT PLACEMENT!!!!!!
krabkore 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The German BND is the renamed 3rd Reich GESTAPO.The BND had organized the delegate Scheuermann of our county to visit or home.To allow him to personally experience how my brother and our parents had been tortured.The BND continued to torture my brother.He was assassinated on July 11th2009.Half a year after the assassination of my brother the CDU delegate Mappus from our district town Pforzheim was made prime minister of the German land of Baden Würtemberg
The CDU is the ruling party in Germany
wwwtotalitaerde 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wwwtotalitaerde Please ignore this idiot. Martin Bott is suffering from a psychosis that makes him believe the government is after him, controlling minds everywhere etc. >_> His allegedly murdered brother even went to court against him because he didn’t want him to use his name for that nonsense. Now he sticks to defaming my country in Youtube videos.
xSuperiorManx 2 months ago
Comment removed
DarthAlphaTheGreat 2 months ago
right, who shit under the bottle this time?
aaron22555 2 months ago
why does it look like a bullet and not like a beam?
freeweed 2 months ago
it would be really cool if they put a mirror inside the bottle and letting the light bounce on it into an other direction.
87mrks 2 months ago
Why not arrange some mirrors inside a big transparent box filled with some sort of gas (so that it's visible). Then fire the LAZORZ and watch the beam of power bounce around the thing like motherfucker. Do something spectacular, you assholes. Throw some prisms in as well.
hr1100 2 months ago
I want to see light going through a prism!
starofcctv94 2 months ago 7
I've been waiting for the explosion... Bottle is still intact... Desapointed...
docthorr 2 months ago
trillion frames per second *1mb per frame=1 million terabyte of data per second =FAKE
patchinko69 2 months ago
@patchinko69 I hope you are intentionally being moronic. But just in case...
These are not second long samples, they are about a nano second, which is how long it takes light to travel about a foot (see how that works?). So divide your numbers by one billion (the number of nanoseconds in one second) and that is how much data is actually required.
If they were a full second then you'd be watching the light travel to the moon, and the full video would take about 40 years to watch.
chodaboy51500 2 months ago 11
@chodaboy51500 to my mind you are moron
artefom 2 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Comment removed
DerWaffel 2 months ago
@patchinko69 shut the fuck up
Joobacca0319 2 months ago
@patchinko69 they'll probably say, their took samples from a lot less than a second :D
still, i still believe this is a FAKE too :P
izmanq 2 months ago
choraa cahorraaada!!!!!
arturhoo 2 months ago in playlist Liked videos
This has been flagged as spam show
I would love to see this on a larger scale than a soda bottle or an apple.
TK549 2 months ago
Comment removed
TK549 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ground floor opportunity backed by a highly successful 10 year old company.
check it out! * amazingautosystem.weebly.com *
MultiAhka 2 months ago
Читаем Игоря Иванова и понимаем, что заявленная "съемка со скоростью триллион кадров в секунду" - чушь. igorivanov.blogspot.com/2011/12/trillion-fps.html
mirrik 2 months ago
reclama la coca cola?
toughrame 2 months ago
Dear Santa...
DeckerBens 2 months ago
100% fake... it's 3d
sashabgmailru 2 months ago
@sashabgmailru No, it's not.
lolicanadian 2 months ago
@sashabgmailru
yes. You're totally right its totally "100% fake"
MIT researches put their credibility on the line and made a fake and called it real to fool all the other scientists.
you fucktard. you're 100% retarded.
grant11102 2 months ago
Hello! Would you show the same only in vacuum?
TheDenall 2 months ago
you people believe that shit? are u serious?
MrXyrium 2 months ago
So MIT can afford state of the art bleeding edge technology that can slow down the fastest particles in the world to allow viewing, but they can't afford the royalties to better music? If you're going to spend tens of millions of dollars producing a video, atleast spend the extra 200$ and get some decent music. Amiright?
RedSkiesAwaitUs 2 months ago
Fake.
If you can see the "Speed of light" then how come you don't see the light traveling to the table from the reflection?
nickpoinier1 2 months ago
@nickpoinier1 they're not scanning that area.
toothfareie 2 months ago
@nickpoinier1 Speed of light's different between the water and the air.
AdhesiveDuckOKB 2 months ago
@nickpoinier1 the light reaches the table prior to the camera, so you can see the reflection in the camera ;-)
archimedesmp 2 months ago
@nickpoinier1 Youre saying that MIT scientists would put their credibility on the line for a youtube video? Dumb shit. It's a laser....
iNFamousAAC 2 months ago
@nickpoinier1 the camera isn't directly between the bottle and the table, so a photon travelling from one to another wouldn't enter the camera, unless it took a detour
HolyHandGrenade797 2 months ago
インパクトにはかけるなぁ。普通のデジカメで、コーラボトルに懐中電灯あてて撮影しても同じような映像はとれるでしょ。オレだったらプリズムとか鏡とかつかって光を屈折させてみせるけどね。
kamapet 2 months ago
slow motion light sounds like trance music.
HighProphetOfRegret 2 months ago
I'll bet coke loves the free advertising. They should send the researchers a ton of free coke.
cobra75410 2 months ago
Wow !!! hope these cameras are out for Christmas.
lyco46 2 months ago
The camera is at 10^12 (1,000,000,000,000) fp/s.
If we were to watch one whole second of film @30fp/s,
it would take:
(((((10^12)/30)/(60^2))/24)/365.242199) years..
(10^12)/30 = 33333333333+(1/3) seconds..
(33333333333+(1/3))/(60^2) = 9259259+(7/27) hours..
(9259259+(7/27))/24 = 385802+(38/81) days..
(385802+(38/81))/365.242199 = 1056 years + about 107 days.
...
What a way to spend a millennium! :)
l2udolph 2 months ago 42
@l2udolph Thank you!!!!! I was actually wondering this didnt want to do the math.
MrBGeonzon 2 months ago
They explain in more detail if you click the video link in the Video Responses.
bfriar 2 months ago
凄い！
SORAPAPAGOGO 2 months ago
@bray987 this is amazing because this camera can a) capture 1 trillionth of a second and b) combine it with other frames from identical actions into one single series of sequential video.
bfriar 2 months ago
@hfalc this camera doesn't truly capture 1 trillion FPS. It captures frames that are 1 trillionth of a second, then combines them from several samplings over several minutes to create a whole. To get one second of video, it would capture 1 trillion frames but it would be from many instances of the same action. What you are seeing in the combination of many tiny pieces of many laser pulses.
bfriar 2 months ago
@bfriar It figures. Otherwise, at normal frame rate of 30 fps it would take 33,333,333,333 seconds to watch a second of recorded video. This might have it's uses in science. But still it is a cheat. It does not show the propagation of a light beam. But a sequence of stills taken from many bursts of light and at different points of it's trajectory. It is cool to watch anyway.
oalternativo 2 months ago
And how is this a huge break-through? I don't get how this video is any different than any other video of a lower FPS
bray987 2 months ago
@bray987 we can see the light move
Nyocurio 2 months ago
@bray987 Well you capture me a video that shows light moving if it's not any different than videoing your dog taking a shit.
Filmer1eX 2 months ago
@bray987 Pro tip: Light travels 7 times around the world in a second (about 300 000km/s). In the video you can see it travelling distances that are measured in CENTIMETERS (0.00001km).
Filmer1eX 2 months ago
AWESOME !
alexcejbr 2 months ago
"Mommy, what Is that light passing on the coke bottle?
-
That's you - inside me."
GustavoMsTrashCan 2 months ago
Nuka-Cola Quartz ftw
Tehnloss 2 months ago
@Tehnloss I used to drink that. Then i took an arrow in the knee
RulezMac 2 months ago
mit is full of awesome
yurianne07 2 months ago
finally we can film a roundhouse kick of chuck!
therumas 2 months ago 2
NOOOOOOOOOOO
ryandrums1001 2 months ago
Just noticed the bottle was full of water, that slows light down to about 140,000 miles per second. So 739,200,000 FPS.
Do the same math as before, it would take about 328 years to watch a full second of footage slowed down this much.
EthanJM 2 months ago 2
Amaaazing, O_o would have been better if the bottle cap was reflective and the light burst would bounce back towards the opposite direction. XP
jcasa12 2 months ago
Did some math, guess I will share it.
The 2 liter bottle is a foot in length, it took the pulse 14 seconds to go from the bottom to top of the bottle.
Light travels about 186,000 miles per second, that is 982,080,000 feet per second. Multiply that by 14, then divide to minutes, hours, days, and years.
So to watch a second of real time slowed down this much, it would take you about 436 years to watch. Rough estimate since that is not exact light speed or exactly 14 seconds, but you get the gist.
EthanJM 2 months ago
Boring. Go directly @ 2:25
saranerape 2 months ago
From what i read of it recently the neutrino thing is most likely an "error" related to the satellite used as the single clock of the experiment to counter "relativity" effects. Using different clocks would not be accurate at all so they had no choice. But since the earth move (so does the satellite) and spin, it introduce "incertainty" to an insane amount of parameters. So long story short, in the end this might only prove Einstein theory once again instead of discredit it.
joker801 2 months ago
At first, I thought this was AMAZING, but then I read the description. It's not actually filming the movement of light, but it's taking millions of observations of different times. Still pretty cool, but nowhere as cool as I thought...
linkmandrew 2 months ago
@linkmandrew
I don't know, it seems to me like it's the same principle as normal recording since you can decently say that all events (different flashes) are the exact same (at our scale... we cannot possibly see any difference ).
Amazing that is .
chibraxial 2 months ago
@chibraxial I think he means that moving objects cannot be filmed with this technique
Requiemes 2 months ago
@Requiemes
Oh that.
chibraxial 2 months ago
@linkmandrew Man, it's AMAZING. Just to say, the process of capturing color images is more complex than b&w pic, and even though b&w is closest to reallity. Ppl would just say the opposit. In this case, the method can be repeated several times, without meaning any loose to the experiment. It's a view from a macro-universe.
ProtonRocket 2 months ago
@linkmandrew Man, I think the principle of filming is to capture lots of consecutive frames of the scene. Every camera works this way, isn't it? The great thing about this one is that it can capture 1 trillion frames per second, way more than the regular ones.
hfalc 2 months ago
Suddenly I want to drink Coke.
gelgermek 2 months ago
Sorprendente.... la cago!!!
ZerGiOX 2 months ago
they should shoot a light beam through a glass of water to observe the change in velocity
altjff15 2 months ago
Coca-cola rulez
quaest 2 months ago
the most expensive Coca-Cola ad ever ;)
madvas2 2 months ago 80
@madvas2 Not expensive at all
LaiPt 2 months ago
With this camera Star Wars was filmed.
olho3X 2 months ago
Thumbs up if you want them to hit the bottle while the light "is traveling" trough it, to see if the light follows the bottle or not.
ZeusDeusEx 2 months ago
On September 22, 2011, a paper[73] from the OPERA Collaboration indicated detection of 17-GeV and 28-GeV muon neutrinos, sent 730 kilometers (454 miles) from CERN near Geneva, Switzerland to the Gran Sasso National Laboratory in Italy, traveling faster than light by a factor of 2.48×10−5 (approximately 1 in 40,322.58), a statistic with 6.0-sigma significance.[74] On 18 November 2011, a second followup experiment by OPERA scientists confirmed their initial results.[75][76]
MrZaphry 2 months ago
@acolon001 & @vanHillQ, why don't you explain what you understand, this is still a fake to me, may be you two should understand first before saying i'm ridicule myself
izmanq 2 months ago
I came here from OCN!!!!
JAF5537 2 months ago
Also doesn't change the fact that neutrinos are invisible...
l34512 2 months ago
finally, we can watch justin biebers sextape once it comes out.
TheStoryWeLive 2 months ago
sounds like porn music
yermommy777 2 months ago
Good viral ad by Coca Cola, I guess =D
strixcz 2 months ago
Did coca cola company pay a bit of their science grant?
jackrazalas 2 months ago
So am I understanding this right? They flash an instance of light toward the bottom of the bottle and we're watching the light travel across the bottle?
boazn8 2 months ago
@boazn8 Exactly, But it can't be taken one shot at a time. they can only take one row of pixels per shot and they combine each video into this complete aspect ratio movie.
Helicopterpilot16 2 months ago
@Helicopterpilot16 Thank you.
boazn8 2 months ago
@Helicopterpilot16 Right! Lets crank it up... 'Right Up', until it pops..
helicoptered 2 months ago
This is amazing! I -3 science
rustytoe178 2 months ago
thumbs up if came here from linux.org.ru. Ну же!
nexfwallYT 2 months ago
I just accidentally a Coca-Cola bottle
izvratforever 2 months ago
i can't believe so many people just believe this BS, it's a fake. It's just a 3D rendered animation, they can't even make a good fake 3D rendered animation, check the light refraction reflected on the table, how come the refraction reflection on the table appear the same time as main light reflection, infact the refraction displayed further right from the main, but still displayed at the same time. c'mon guys, we all learn basic physic at high school or college. shame on MIT for pulling this BS
izmanq 2 months ago
@izmanq as another person said... Read the info first!. or at least look elsewhere to understand how this is captured before you ridicule yourself.
vanHillQ 2 months ago in playlist Más vídeos de cameraculturegroup
@izmanq you don't get what this video represents do you?
acolon001 2 months ago
@izmanq Boy, you're trolling around a bunch of these videos trying your very best to convince people it's fake, when it is undeniably a scientific fact. Not to mention the very theory of this type of camera is completely solid and sound.
Apparently you're physics department is/was a complete failure if they didn't teach you the very basics of physics.
gymkhanadog 2 months ago
FLASHBACK
MLmaus 2 months ago
Why is there no idiot that writes "I love to play Quake on that much FPS!"
BenderDefender 2 months ago 2
you guys are awesome and a referencein tecnology development
invadergui 2 months ago
If this is true, I want to see light bouncing from a mirror without seeing a reflection on the floor first.
joseamirandavelez 2 months ago
How come if this is a particle of light it have a light reflection? Isn't the light reflected part of this particle? Shouldn't we see the light moving towards the reflecting surface too? I call shenanigans!
joseamirandavelez 2 months ago
Comment removed
elementx440 2 months ago
@joseamirandavelez read the info genius... "However, due to very short exposure times (roughly one trillionth of a second) and a narrow field of view of the camera, the video is captured over several minutes by repeated and periodic sampling."
elementx440 2 months ago
Isn't light slower in the water ?
How about capturing one of those green lasers..
e1gr 2 months ago
Perfect tool to capture Kim Kardashian's wedding
munkisbeprotis 2 months ago
Helm,warp 9, engage!
GamleErik100 2 months ago
ONE TRILLION FPS...the only thing that comes to my mind is HOOOOOOOOOOOOLY SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIT!
MrNiemamnicka 2 months ago
Mother of God
tsotnep 2 months ago
i wish i had this sort of money to fuck around in an MIT lab
invisiblecrowe 2 months ago
@invisiblecrowe It doesn't take money it takes hard work and brains.
michalchik 2 months ago
@michalchik getting the money is the easy part...
elementx440 2 months ago
that video must be 10 terabytes recording 1080p @ 1,000,000,000,000 FPS
FearInTheDeep 2 months ago
@FearInTheDeep Not if the video is only 1/10000000000000 of a second (one femtosecond) in length. That's *light* you're seeing travel across there, so it's the time light takes to travel the .5 meters or so we see in the video. That's a short time. Youtube can only display 24 frames per second like any other video, and your computer's screen is probably only 60Hz, but they've taken so many frames (essentially pictures) that they can slow it down and present it here.
RBIVscreamtherequiem 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I need a camera like that... It would be something else to be able to record what I see and almost don't....with that.
What a great video.
TakenByGreys 2 months ago
Comment removed
TakenByGreys 2 months ago
hope they were sponsored by coca cola
shadowyman 2 months ago
What kind of camera records a trillion fps? Damn..
sharmadd 2 months ago
Boring video for that tech!
mixarrpg 2 months ago
@mixarrpg
What would you rather see? One second filmed at this speed takes over a thousand YEARS to play back... anything 'cool', such as explosions etc... would take longer than your lifetime to watch. Light is about the only thing fast enough to visualise with this.
JMMC1005 2 months ago
Also, this technique requires a repeatable even to be filmed many times so that the camera can pick up a narrow view and stitch them together into a full frame. So only stuff like light pulses which can be set off identically again and again, can be filmed.
JMMC1005 2 months ago
This is the fastest particle in the universe, and to manage to make it look this slow, truly unbelievable. Just contemplate the fact that nothing in this universe is faster than that light pulse. Wow
servercabinet 2 months ago 18
@servercabinet you're wrong. researchers have found a particle that's faster than light. it's called neutrino.
Lzibbah 2 months ago
@Lzibbah That hasn't been replicated by an independent group. It's still only one group reporting those results.
Mycha31 2 months ago
@Mycha31 @michalchik from what i've read, it's already been proven that neutrino is faster than light. they've been testing for months and months for faults, but there has been none.
Lzibbah 2 months ago
@Lzibbah It doesn't matter that one group has been testing it for months and months. Their results are interesting, but you need the same data to be replicated by SEVERAL groups. I'm not saying it's impossible that neutrinos can be FTL. I'm just saying the jury is still out; we just need to wait for other groups to corroborate their results.
Mycha31 2 months ago
@Lzibbah Unproven, probably experimental error. they are still trying to get the bugs worked it. It is certain that some neutrinos go slower than light.
michalchik 2 months ago
@servercabinet
Actually Light is not the fastest in the universe anymore. Neutrinos are.
islumbum 2 months ago
@islumbum That doesn't change the fact that light is pretty damn fast.
MarkWIXX 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
@islumbum Actually you are wrong, it was shown to be a miscalculation.
TheWoWGrind 2 months ago
@TheWoWGrind
It wasn't found to be a "miscalculation". Lots of scientists went into an uproar about the neutron being faster. So they are going back and re-testing everything all the scientists and theorist are saying they did wrong. and the results are still showing the neutron being faster. So... no I am not wrong. Nice try though. ;)
islumbum 2 months ago
@islumbum
Whoops meant neutrinos not neutrons. Lol.
islumbum 2 months ago
@islumbum agree, follow up test have confirmed the original test, that the particles are faster than light.
MrDmc1184 2 months ago
@islumbum Both of you idiots are wrong. The findings won't hold weight until all possible errors can be calculated out. The biggest being the clocks both labs use, even a tiny discrepancy could easily grant the neutrinos the 60 they measured. Being as though the clocks aren't synchronized with eachother that's very probable.
GTRZE70 2 months ago
@TheWoWGrind false...Follow up test have confirmed the original test
MrDmc1184 2 months ago
@servercabinet we cant confirm that light pulse is faster in universe due to last discoveries in CERN
pilotossss 2 months ago