Even if the moon landing was a fake. This track stimulates my mind into wanting the human race to continue exploring . to reach further into the cosmos. it is an adventure, let us go together as 1.
i'm sorry for the guy, who had to sit in the rocket the whole time while the 2 others got to walk over the moon....sorry nobody remembers you, but you were very importend for the mission!
Neil Armstrong just can't wait to die so he can start spinning in his grave over what fucking losers you've become NASA. From inspiration to humanity to demotivational goof-balls, for shame!
@Veldtian1 NASA is like a car. It will get you where you want when you tell it where to go and give it some gas. The prolem is the no one has told NASA to do anything more than drive around the block for 20 or 30 years.
Imagine if all the money being spent on the Iraq war was being spent on the space program.
I don't blame the Americans alone for this, the religious extremes and other outdated concepts driving terrorism must take much of the blame. What a waste of human existence that we must spend our lives thinking about war, religion and famine rather than fulfilling our responsibility to the universe, which is to simply set eyes and possibly feet on everything we possibly can!
@117425yt That's the problem most people aren't logical. They dismiss space programs as a wast of moeny out of hand with even looking in to it. That's not logical. What is is to look in to it then make up your mind.
NASA was founded by former Nazi scientists. The Americans brought over Nazi scientists from Germany during operation Paper Clip and gave them asylum in the US. In return they were to give up their secrets, knowledge and help. Wernher Von Braun was one of these scientists. Call me "crazy" but I'm right.....
@kidkong584 Nasa's path in the last 40 years is a cause of the use of our brain's capacity over time. In the 1600's Kepler figured out planetary motion using simple telescopes, today an average physics student could not derive this alone with the use of advanced telescopes. Regardless of the massive amount of free information available to us, today's generation is more concerend about Snooky or justin biever than whether we can find life in space or the improvement of our world thru science.
Thats were you are wrong , the ignorant have always existed , and they will continue to exist till the end of time. Brilliant people have always existed too.
@Ilurbtool 'As we explore the reaches of space, let us go to the new worlds together-not as new worlds to be conquered, but as a new adventure to be shared.' Richard Milhous Nixon: First Inaugural Address
If you watch NASA backwards, it's about a space agency that has no spaceflight capability, then performs low-orbital spaceflights, then goes to the moon.
I remember one of the great ironies is that most of the time a part of science or tool of it truned in to wepon but the Satarn V's are wepons truned tool of science
@kokofan50 Yes and no. Rockets were always meant to do this. Werner von Braun said when the first V-2 launched successfully - the rocket was a complete success, but it landed on the wrong planet.
If people still think that the moon landing was faked, they should watch the Mythbusters episode in which they look at some of the so-called evidence of it being faked and prove that none of it is really evidence at all.
@nagasako7 Do you know how much "moon rock samples" was officially "collected" by Apollo missions? And how much was really SEEN, and ANALYSED by world wide scientists?
@bodyguardik Well considering the fact that they were held at NASA and any scientist could come to the lab and examine them, I'd say whichever scientist wanted to.
Linda M. V. Martel 2010, G. Jeffrey Taylor 2010, Marc Norman2004,Barbara A. Cohen 2001, Paul D. Spudis 1996, Thomas A. Hockey 1986, John E. Guest 1977, Ronald Greeley 1977,Hal Marcovitz 2000.
Those are just the first few I got off the top of any list concerning published articles dealing with examination of moon rock samples. In the future, at least pretend to know what it is you are talking about.
@bodyguardik It's in their published findings on the examination and tests they did. And last I checked, it was returned like usual. Moon samples are considered priceless after all. Don't see how this question is relevant (Or even cogent..).
@bodyguardik They brought back around 800 lb. or kg (I forgot that units they said) The US gave samples to many different countries. WE know they are from the moon because they have less water in them than any rock on earth.
@bodyguardik The weight doesn't matter what matters is the nubmer samples tested. They've tesed a larg nember of samples. That's why we know the fact that moon rocks have a lot less water than earth rocks.
@kokofan50 large number of samples? Are you jokeing? It was micrograms, wich was returned after testing. All samples, wich was really SEEN, was collected by unmanned automatic missions, not by apollo.
NASA put some crosses on their photos so you could tell whether they where editted. Well, we found some photos where the surrounding objects are above this "cross". Meaning, they edited their footage, what about it. I'm just trying to convince not only you, but me, that the moon landing is not fake. NASA, is out, and they might not come back, give them a chance, and let us procede to mars, and brig about the first marshains.
So many reasons why the info lead to be the fake moon landing is satire. The flags movement is not wind, its the force of gravity, you don't expect it to stand still do you? Theres some gravity on the surface of the moon, and even if their wasn't, the flag would point in an upward position, and the weason there is no blast radius, is well... Theres no fire in space, so what what would create a blast radius or crater? Why would anybody say our biggest edvancment in history is fake?
Seeing the Mission Control guys in this video, it reminded me how much stress they were under just before the lander touched down. I saw a TV documentary recently: said some of the systems were barely operational. Fuel was low, as well. Has to be one of the 20th C's iconic moments.
@LsBaba Yeah. Within a just few minutes of the landing, a master alarm randomly went off (They had no idea what had caused it... they later found out they had forgotten to turn off a radar, data from which overloaded the computer), plus Neil realized that their landing site was too rocky and had to manually aim for another location, which caused fuel to run low. They only had a few seconds of fuel left when they touched down.
@Airclot Yeah its sad that NASA gets 14.5 billion in our budget, and every damn year people complain that its a waste of money, yet the money is being spent here and into our economy, and the research needed for space exploration is giving us advances in medical science and helpful tools we use everyday. LIKE CELL PHONES. People need to understand that space exploration is expensive... but it is the greatest investment we can ever put money into :)
I personaly think we went to the moon, but the shity moon image look fake, anybody working in cinematic have doubt about it. Honestly, look at 1:52 it look fake, Kubrick did better then that in 1968 with his movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. Color existed in 1969 and they want us to believe the naza still had shity black and white technology. They could have film the first man walking on the moon in color.
@raptors222222 I agree with you, they didn't have a lot of spare power. Sending live video transmission from the moon probably used a lot of energy, that's why the video are shity. The pictures are great however.
I wasn't alive for the Moon landing, but I hope that within my lifetime I get to see the first men walk on Mars. What a day in history that will truly be.
Am I the only one that cried over this? :) It's just so... beautiful to me. The progress of man. And to think; Islam's symbol is the moon. But who got to the moon first? Not Islam!
@Curttehmurt We did not colonize the moon in 40 years because there isn't anything to gain from colonizing it, except redicoulus expensess and zero new knowledge.
@hirokiEU09 While I agree it would be costly we certainly would gain new knowledge, like how to establish extraterrestrial colonies. The Moon is the obvious jumping off point we need in order to land on and also colonize Mars. The fact of the matter is, with all the over population and pollution, the Earth is slowly becoming uninhabitable, we need to have some kind of escape plan!
@Curttehmurt Or, we can invest more practical resources in fixing the problem. We have the resources and technology to do so, but the people we've given all our worthless money over to prevent those changes from taking place.
@Curttehmurt We can't colonize the moon, sir. It has far less gravity than Earth! If any people are to be born on the moon, they'd surely be born extremely thin and fragile. We're probably never gonna colonize the moon. But Mars? Yeah, there's a FAR more likely target for us. ;) Oh and keep in mind, I heard that NASA no longer has the plans to build the engines that brought us to the moon. I dunno if that's true or not, but it would make sense...
@Kniletiah further research in developing artificial gravity could fix that problem, along with physical therapy or possible gene therapy for lunar colonists
As for the engines, maybe there working on better ones
@Curttehmurt The problem is... how do you get artificial gravity? I looked into anti-gravity and it seems to be the electromagnetism is the closest to anti-gravity. So producing gravity, maybe the same can be done there. But really, you can't create gravity without creating mass, which is impossible. Using powerful magnets; perhaps. And we can charge them with solar power, like in the movie 'Moon' (2009). Oh yes they'd better make better engines!
@Curttehmurt Well maybe, but for people to be born on the moon? Babies would need to exercise to keep their muscles intact and everything and... it's just an impractical idea. The Moon’s gravity is less than 17% of Earth’s gravity, and people can not survive long periods of time at such low gravity. Even though people could easily survive short time periods in this low gravity, it would be extremely unhealthy for prolonged periods of time especially when returning to Earth.
@Kniletiah lol they wouldn't be able to go to Earth, the moon colonists would most likely die from the force of reentry, prolonged exposure to low gravity causes bone density complications. You're pretty much correct, there really is no way to colonize the moon without some incredibly advanced tech, that just doesn't exist yet and shows no signs of existing in the near future.
@Curttehmurt We're planning on it. What would be so bad about that anyway? If you are a fan of science, Apollo 11, MelodySheep, Carl Sagan, etc.. you would know that the moon is the first step towards real space exploration.
@Curttehmurt I'd argue that it was a good thing we didn't colonize the moon yet because we're still not mature enough as a species. Forgetting the technical aspects of mass colonization, can you imagine if we colonized the moon today? It would be a neoliberal, xenophobic, overly-religious, warlike, ignorant, superstitious, fearful place because it would reflect the values of the home planet.
@martini1179 OR it could serve as a refuge of intellectuals driven away from the ignorant soil of their home, starting an indipendent way of life.
Actually, both options sound rather impossible to me. The moon just isn't a good place to colonize by anything much larger than a service crew for robots with some mining operations. Now, floating colonies in Venus' athmosphere, or bubble colonies on Mars' surface, that's where man could actually start living.
@macarion I'm actually terribly sorry, all I was thinking was 1969. Then afterward I realized that the 20th century started in 1901. Meaning the sixth ended in 1961. Deepest apologies, big hypocrite moment.
Mankind used to be so ambitious about space exploration. We would have been on Mars by now if we had stayed on track, and possibly on route to Gleise 581c.
@akustika25 Well the money involved would blow our budget by billions. My other thought is, why would we do that when we have a robot there already? Unless there's something on it's surface that requires human observation. But yes, I'd love human space exploration to keep pushing the boundaries.
@nhmllr725 I was just about to say that...I have an older friend who experienced our first journey to another object in the solar system, I am so jealous. Not for the time, but for the attitudes people have these days regarding the costly exercise of human exploration of the cosmos. It's so worth it, what can make people understand it? I fear only a threat to our existence, and maybe then it will be too late.
@nhmllr725 See what you've done? Now people are discussing it.
This is just like when people mention how there are 0 dislikes on a video, then someone dislikes it. Don't you guys realize people just want to spite each other on the internet and giggle to themselves?
@nhmllr725 Yes we did go to the moon, global warming is a man made menace, all the wars in middle east were not about the oil and god is real as you and me. On the false statement department we still have bigfoot, the illuminati, tomorrow's end of the world, fairies, el chupacabra, unicorns, Thor, Spiderman, Humpty Dumpty, the smurfies, the tooth fairy, the 3 lil piggies and my sexy hollywood-actress girlfriend
I hope that's good enough. See you on the moon colonies... not! ;-)
According to the "Great Filter" within the Fermi Paradox, there is one more step we have to take, so that long term survival can be achieved, and that's space colonisation. Also, it took 4 bilion years of random mutations and events on this planet to get to us. Considering the size of the universe, it's higly unlikely that two civilisations can arise within space-time reach of each other., so that they would be aware of the other's existence.
@AlexandruUrsachi There are roughly 200 billion planets in this galaxy that can support life, 100 billion of which most likely have life, The fact that no technological civilization exists other than Earth, anywhere as far as we know, despite all the searching, suggests that technologically advanced species have a very short life span in the cosmos. If we colonize space, we'll just be exporting our problems and delaying the inevitable, we should make our home better, rather than find a new one.
Finding a new home can make our home world better :) First of all, this planet can't sustain our population growth forever, neither can it provide us with unlimidet resources. Second of all, the new technologies and off-Earth resources can benefit the inhabitants of this planet. The fact that another civilisation hasn't been detected means what I've said earlier: inteligent life is a rare thing in the cosmos. Whatever the "end" may be, the goal of life is to live, not die
@AlexandruUrsachi We actually have plenty of the resources we need, the problem though is with corporate "planned obsolescence", When the issues we have on Earth are sorted out, we should explore the cosmos of space with all the zeal the endeavor truly does deserve, but until then, it's only counter productive.
Check out this video: The Sagan Series: Life looks for Life. And you will see what exactly is holding this planet back, and it's not space exploration.
@AlexandruUrsachi That is a straw-man fallacy, I did not claim that space exploration was holding us back, merely that until we can maintain our own planet how can we hope to maintain a foreign one. Please refrain from using straw-man fallacies, it is intellectual fraud.
Then my apologies for misunderstanding your statement. I agree, we shouldn't try to colonise another world until we learn how to live efficiently on our own, but we should continue to explore space, manned and robotically, in parallel with improving our own world
I dont like this as much as your other videos because the clips are not tuned to be singing.. Funny because these songs are the only good justification for auto tune ever.
This video brought tears to my eyes.
D3adM3rchant 1 day ago
lol @ showing Neil jumping onto the landing pad.
JuggaloOzi 3 weeks ago in playlist More videos from melodysheep
People still beleive this is fake? I thought those people died out long ago.
MagneticPig 3 weeks ago
Even if the moon landing was a fake. This track stimulates my mind into wanting the human race to continue exploring . to reach further into the cosmos. it is an adventure, let us go together as 1.
AlexOFranco 1 month ago
the opening narration has a mistake
it was the 7th decade of the 20th century (the first decade was the 00's the second was the 10's the third was the 20's and etc)
knavehart 1 month ago in playlist More videos from melodysheep
Great music. I really loved the Carl Sagan remix. The moon landing was fake, though.
paleopeneyes 2 months ago
@paleopeneyes Please tell me your joking. No one could be that ignorant.
SocksMacguffin 2 months ago in playlist More videos from melodysheep
@paleopeneyes if you are serious - you're an idiot
knavehart 1 month ago in playlist More videos from melodysheep
@paleopeneyes You don't really believe that. Go troll somewhere else, this is a peace & happiness thread.
VulcanFleet 2 weeks ago in playlist Symphony of Science
This remix is just as cool as the moon landing itself!
Redsuit11 3 months ago
The stupid fuck music ruined it
2c1496 4 months ago
i'm sorry for the guy, who had to sit in the rocket the whole time while the 2 others got to walk over the moon....sorry nobody remembers you, but you were very importend for the mission!
CookieTSKM 4 months ago in playlist Weitere Videos von melodysheep
@CookieTSKM Michael Collins was his name. Your post is pretty much ignoring too without his name.
JuggaloOzi 2 months ago in playlist More videos from melodysheep
Neil Armstrong just can't wait to die so he can start spinning in his grave over what fucking losers you've become NASA. From inspiration to humanity to demotivational goof-balls, for shame!
Veldtian1 4 months ago in playlist More videos from melodysheep
@Veldtian1 NASA is like a car. It will get you where you want when you tell it where to go and give it some gas. The prolem is the no one has told NASA to do anything more than drive around the block for 20 or 30 years.
kokofan50 4 months ago in playlist llll
@kokofan50 i agree with that
8789spartan 2 months ago in playlist More videos from melodysheep
This comment has received too many negative votes show
most atheist are pathetic loosers
ALDBslovakia 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ALDBslovakia Look who's talking.
SorryStamin 4 months ago in playlist SorryStamin's favorites
@ALDBslovakia you're a loser. You can't evebn think on your own.
MikeyZeov 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
Oh boring, homework to see this video, its soo boring video!!
Makkamizza 5 months ago
Imagine if all the money being spent on the Iraq war was being spent on the space program.
I don't blame the Americans alone for this, the religious extremes and other outdated concepts driving terrorism must take much of the blame. What a waste of human existence that we must spend our lives thinking about war, religion and famine rather than fulfilling our responsibility to the universe, which is to simply set eyes and possibly feet on everything we possibly can!
a united space race or war?
117425yt 5 months ago
@117425yt If we spent all that money on space we would have made up for the dark ages, and be doing things out of scifi.
kokofan50 5 months ago in playlist llll
@kokofan50 exactly! it seems logical doesn't it? :)
117425yt 5 months ago
@117425yt That's the problem most people aren't logical. They dismiss space programs as a wast of moeny out of hand with even looking in to it. That's not logical. What is is to look in to it then make up your mind.
kokofan50 5 months ago
NASA was founded by former Nazi scientists. The Americans brought over Nazi scientists from Germany during operation Paper Clip and gave them asylum in the US. In return they were to give up their secrets, knowledge and help. Wernher Von Braun was one of these scientists. Call me "crazy" but I'm right.....
TPBXDRicky420 5 months ago in playlist More videos from melodysheep
@TPBXDRicky420 Who cares? Are you some kind of kraut sympathizer?
AsteroidStrike 5 months ago in playlist More videos from melodysheep
@AsteroidStrike How would that make me a Kraut sympathizer? I'm just telling like it is.
TPBXDRicky420 5 months ago
@AsteroidStrike well you care enough to make a comment
ravensfan708 5 months ago
Read that again: LIVE FROM THE SURFACE OF THE MOON! We can be a wonderful species when we put our minds to it.
twosixteen 5 months ago
R.I.P. The space shuttle
zxcasdqwez3 5 months ago in playlist Videos from melodysheep
watching this gives me goosebumps
Omerack 7 months ago
I'm suprised no one commented on thsi today... hmm
kidkong584 7 months ago
@kidkong584 Nasa's path in the last 40 years is a cause of the use of our brain's capacity over time. In the 1600's Kepler figured out planetary motion using simple telescopes, today an average physics student could not derive this alone with the use of advanced telescopes. Regardless of the massive amount of free information available to us, today's generation is more concerend about Snooky or justin biever than whether we can find life in space or the improvement of our world thru science.
d1drifter87 7 months ago
@d1drifter87
Thats were you are wrong , the ignorant have always existed , and they will continue to exist till the end of time. Brilliant people have always existed too.
Daltonn0810 6 months ago 17
"Not as a new world to be conquered, but as a new world to share" Pity those words don't resonate in our own world =/
Ilurbtool 7 months ago 2
@Ilurbtool 'As we explore the reaches of space, let us go to the new worlds together-not as new worlds to be conquered, but as a new adventure to be shared.' Richard Milhous Nixon: First Inaugural Address
jaboogames 3 months ago
This song is also a nice trance track on its own. Good work!
DeftCrowMk3 7 months ago
Where did the camera filming Armstrong climb out come from?
iamthelazerviking 8 months ago
@iamthelazerviking mounted on the outside of the lander.
atteheikkinen 8 months ago
If you watch NASA backwards, it's about a space agency that has no spaceflight capability, then performs low-orbital spaceflights, then goes to the moon.
tricosagon 8 months ago 141
@tricosagon then shuts it all down within ten years
Pollution122 7 months ago
@tricosagon now that was clever
MrMudkipKing 5 months ago in playlist More videos from melodysheep
@tricosagon I wish I could give that a million thumbs up
Electricdreamerb 1 month ago in playlist More videos from melodysheep
Thumbs up for going to the moon instead of full scale thermonuclear war
TheyCallMeJake1 8 months ago
"I'd like to congratulate mankind on not colonizing
the moon after 40 years, good work everybody" - Curttehmurt
---------------------
Lol, thats sad, lol...damn you sarcasm.
I've not been lying to you, i just've been sarcastic.
Lol, thats sad, lol...damn you sarcasm.
strjzkmnbf 9 months ago
I remember one of the great ironies is that most of the time a part of science or tool of it truned in to wepon but the Satarn V's are wepons truned tool of science
kokofan50 9 months ago
@kokofan50 Yes and no. Rockets were always meant to do this. Werner von Braun said when the first V-2 launched successfully - the rocket was a complete success, but it landed on the wrong planet.
MartinJWillett 9 months ago
dammit, if we could to ^ this in 20 or so years, then why the hell can't we develope an environmentally friendly fuel?
Kickasss119 9 months ago
If people still think that the moon landing was faked, they should watch the Mythbusters episode in which they look at some of the so-called evidence of it being faked and prove that none of it is really evidence at all.
JediVulcanTimeLord 9 months ago
Really? You all can't be dicks for 2 minutes in your life? Saddens me....
ThePhantomZero0 10 months ago
"Americans are all dumb"
So dumb they are the only country in human history to walk on the moon, collect moon rock samples, play golf there and plant flags there.
If only Americans were smart they'd land on the moon, they'd walk on the moon, collect moon rock samples, play golf there and plant flags there.
nagasako7 10 months ago 3
@nagasako7 lolz
bkrboy53 9 months ago
@nagasako7 Do you know how much "moon rock samples" was officially "collected" by Apollo missions? And how much was really SEEN, and ANALYSED by world wide scientists?
bodyguardik 8 months ago
@bodyguardik Well considering the fact that they were held at NASA and any scientist could come to the lab and examine them, I'd say whichever scientist wanted to.
danschaoticmind 7 months ago
@danschaoticmind exact numbers, and names, please
bodyguardik 7 months ago
@bodyguardik Ba dum tish.
Linda M. V. Martel 2010, G. Jeffrey Taylor 2010, Marc Norman2004,Barbara A. Cohen 2001, Paul D. Spudis 1996, Thomas A. Hockey 1986, John E. Guest 1977, Ronald Greeley 1977,Hal Marcovitz 2000.
Those are just the first few I got off the top of any list concerning published articles dealing with examination of moon rock samples. In the future, at least pretend to know what it is you are talking about.
danschaoticmind 7 months ago
@danschaoticmind so, how much milligrams of they got? And did you know what after examination scientists must to return samples?
bodyguardik 7 months ago
@bodyguardik It's in their published findings on the examination and tests they did. And last I checked, it was returned like usual. Moon samples are considered priceless after all. Don't see how this question is relevant (Or even cogent..).
danschaoticmind 7 months ago
@bodyguardik They brought back around 800 lb. or kg (I forgot that units they said) The US gave samples to many different countries. WE know they are from the moon because they have less water in them than any rock on earth.
kokofan50 7 months ago in playlist llll
@kokofan50 ok, 800lb. So, do you know weight of "apollo" samples, wich was really SEEN and analysed by scientists?
bodyguardik 7 months ago
@bodyguardik The weight doesn't matter what matters is the nubmer samples tested. They've tesed a larg nember of samples. That's why we know the fact that moon rocks have a lot less water than earth rocks.
kokofan50 7 months ago
@kokofan50 large number of samples? Are you jokeing? It was micrograms, wich was returned after testing. All samples, wich was really SEEN, was collected by unmanned automatic missions, not by apollo.
bodyguardik 7 months ago
NASA put some crosses on their photos so you could tell whether they where editted. Well, we found some photos where the surrounding objects are above this "cross". Meaning, they edited their footage, what about it. I'm just trying to convince not only you, but me, that the moon landing is not fake. NASA, is out, and they might not come back, give them a chance, and let us procede to mars, and brig about the first marshains.
Putz4Ever 10 months ago
So many reasons why the info lead to be the fake moon landing is satire. The flags movement is not wind, its the force of gravity, you don't expect it to stand still do you? Theres some gravity on the surface of the moon, and even if their wasn't, the flag would point in an upward position, and the weason there is no blast radius, is well... Theres no fire in space, so what what would create a blast radius or crater? Why would anybody say our biggest edvancment in history is fake?
Putz4Ever 10 months ago
what melodi is this?
MikeyZeov 10 months ago
Simply, the greatest single achievement of mankind in the 20th century.
sachibbsr 10 months ago
Seeing the Mission Control guys in this video, it reminded me how much stress they were under just before the lander touched down. I saw a TV documentary recently: said some of the systems were barely operational. Fuel was low, as well. Has to be one of the 20th C's iconic moments.
LsBaba 10 months ago
@LsBaba Yeah. Within a just few minutes of the landing, a master alarm randomly went off (They had no idea what had caused it... they later found out they had forgotten to turn off a radar, data from which overloaded the computer), plus Neil realized that their landing site was too rocky and had to manually aim for another location, which caused fuel to run low. They only had a few seconds of fuel left when they touched down.
Spaceguy5 10 months ago
this is probably my third favorite melody sheep piece, after we're all connected and pitted remix
misinglink15 11 months ago
Worlds grow old and suns grow cold
And death we never can doubt.
Time's cold wind, wailing down the past,
Reminds us that all flesh is grass
And history's lamps blow out. But the Eagle has landed; tell your children when. Time won't drive us down to dust again.
Killersepp 11 months ago
I want to start a new country, and put all government money into science.
Airclot 11 months ago 137
@Airclot You should look into 'The Venus Project'
MrrGrave 9 months ago
@Airclot I can be the prime minister if you are the president.
Nickname006 9 months ago
@Airclot Yeah its sad that NASA gets 14.5 billion in our budget, and every damn year people complain that its a waste of money, yet the money is being spent here and into our economy, and the research needed for space exploration is giving us advances in medical science and helpful tools we use everyday. LIKE CELL PHONES. People need to understand that space exploration is expensive... but it is the greatest investment we can ever put money into :)
ToxxinProductions 8 months ago 3
@Airclot its called japan...lol jk
CommedyCommedy 5 months ago in playlist More videos from melodysheep
@Airclot lol antartica :P
Imtre1 4 months ago
Goddamn, what need I do to make these capitalist bastards fly to Mars? Go, guys, go!
Mauser91 11 months ago
@Mauser91 A good return on investment.
raptors222222 11 months ago
This video is totally under-rated, based on its number of views...
hautepower 11 months ago
Let's go back to the moon!
simoncpu 11 months ago
@simoncpu and past it
kokofan50 9 months ago
I personaly think we went to the moon, but the shity moon image look fake, anybody working in cinematic have doubt about it. Honestly, look at 1:52 it look fake, Kubrick did better then that in 1968 with his movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. Color existed in 1969 and they want us to believe the naza still had shity black and white technology. They could have film the first man walking on the moon in color.
philbox17 11 months ago
@philbox17 They had enough spare power to run a lone Christmas light. Yeah, the image is gonna suck.
raptors222222 11 months ago
@raptors222222 I agree with you, they didn't have a lot of spare power. Sending live video transmission from the moon probably used a lot of energy, that's why the video are shity. The pictures are great however.
philbox17 11 months ago
@philbox17
NASA understandably didn't have the money to ship a professional film crew and their respective equipment to the moon.
TheHatheist 11 months ago
@TheHatheist They at least tried to give the astronauts photography lessons before the missions =p
Spaceguy5 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
19 people think the moon landing was a" HOAX"
yxrcbszg 1 year ago
I wasn't alive for the Moon landing, but I hope that within my lifetime I get to see the first men walk on Mars. What a day in history that will truly be.
nhlfan33 1 year ago
Am I the only one that cried over this? :) It's just so... beautiful to me. The progress of man. And to think; Islam's symbol is the moon. But who got to the moon first? Not Islam!
Kniletiah 1 year ago
Your right dude. Science is power. Knowledge is power.
aaronashrosen 1 year ago
19 people must think the landing was faked.
Karlfalcon 1 year ago
reminds me alot of pretty lights
crimsonhanded 1 year ago
SCIENCE!
OniLinkSword 1 year ago
I'd like to congratulate mankind on not colonizing the moon after 40 years, good work everybody
Curttehmurt 1 year ago 61
@Curttehmurt We did not colonize the moon in 40 years because there isn't anything to gain from colonizing it, except redicoulus expensess and zero new knowledge.
hirokiEU09 1 year ago
@hirokiEU09 While I agree it would be costly we certainly would gain new knowledge, like how to establish extraterrestrial colonies. The Moon is the obvious jumping off point we need in order to land on and also colonize Mars. The fact of the matter is, with all the over population and pollution, the Earth is slowly becoming uninhabitable, we need to have some kind of escape plan!
Curttehmurt 1 year ago
@Curttehmurt Spacestations and according to a french architect: the so called Lilypad. Just read about it today. :P But yes, you have a point.
hirokiEU09 1 year ago
@Curttehmurt Or, we can invest more practical resources in fixing the problem. We have the resources and technology to do so, but the people we've given all our worthless money over to prevent those changes from taking place.
marshall8787 1 year ago
@Curttehmurt We can't colonize the moon, sir. It has far less gravity than Earth! If any people are to be born on the moon, they'd surely be born extremely thin and fragile. We're probably never gonna colonize the moon. But Mars? Yeah, there's a FAR more likely target for us. ;) Oh and keep in mind, I heard that NASA no longer has the plans to build the engines that brought us to the moon. I dunno if that's true or not, but it would make sense...
Kniletiah 1 year ago
@Kniletiah further research in developing artificial gravity could fix that problem, along with physical therapy or possible gene therapy for lunar colonists
As for the engines, maybe there working on better ones
Curttehmurt 1 year ago
@Curttehmurt The problem is... how do you get artificial gravity? I looked into anti-gravity and it seems to be the electromagnetism is the closest to anti-gravity. So producing gravity, maybe the same can be done there. But really, you can't create gravity without creating mass, which is impossible. Using powerful magnets; perhaps. And we can charge them with solar power, like in the movie 'Moon' (2009). Oh yes they'd better make better engines!
Kniletiah 1 year ago
@Kniletiah regardless, I'm sure NASA (or whomever) will come up with some solution to deal with the effects of low gravity on the human body
Curttehmurt 1 year ago
@Curttehmurt Well maybe, but for people to be born on the moon? Babies would need to exercise to keep their muscles intact and everything and... it's just an impractical idea. The Moon’s gravity is less than 17% of Earth’s gravity, and people can not survive long periods of time at such low gravity. Even though people could easily survive short time periods in this low gravity, it would be extremely unhealthy for prolonged periods of time especially when returning to Earth.
Kniletiah 1 year ago
@Kniletiah lol they wouldn't be able to go to Earth, the moon colonists would most likely die from the force of reentry, prolonged exposure to low gravity causes bone density complications. You're pretty much correct, there really is no way to colonize the moon without some incredibly advanced tech, that just doesn't exist yet and shows no signs of existing in the near future.
Southparker100000000 1 year ago
@Curttehmurt We're planning on it. What would be so bad about that anyway? If you are a fan of science, Apollo 11, MelodySheep, Carl Sagan, etc.. you would know that the moon is the first step towards real space exploration.
IIXIXOXIXII 8 months ago
@IIXIXOXIXII I was being sarcastic, I'm disappointed that we haven't done it yet
Curttehmurt 8 months ago
@Curttehmurt whew. sry then lol
IIXIXOXIXII 8 months ago
@Curttehmurt I'd argue that it was a good thing we didn't colonize the moon yet because we're still not mature enough as a species. Forgetting the technical aspects of mass colonization, can you imagine if we colonized the moon today? It would be a neoliberal, xenophobic, overly-religious, warlike, ignorant, superstitious, fearful place because it would reflect the values of the home planet.
martini1179 8 months ago
@martini1179 OR it could serve as a refuge of intellectuals driven away from the ignorant soil of their home, starting an indipendent way of life.
Actually, both options sound rather impossible to me. The moon just isn't a good place to colonize by anything much larger than a service crew for robots with some mining operations. Now, floating colonies in Venus' athmosphere, or bubble colonies on Mars' surface, that's where man could actually start living.
TheRonfl 8 months ago
wow really cool song and nice effects on the talking. Really awesome video, thanks
maxmra 1 year ago
at 1:04 begins the most orgasmic song ever
gordenfreemen1337 1 year ago
at 1:45 is that the flag in the middle? how come its like that?
ncdc123 1 year ago
@ncdc123 Because it was windy.
hoza41 1 year ago
I wasnt alive during our first steps onto another celestial body. I can only hope that we return to the moon before the end of my lifetime.
sakar181 1 year ago
0:11 It was actually the 7th decade.
macarion 1 year ago 4
@macarion Fuck could you please be bothered to research something before you comment?
Tridead 1 year ago
@Tridead I don't know what you mean. The 1960's were the 7th decade of the 20th century.
macarion 1 year ago
@macarion I'm actually terribly sorry, all I was thinking was 1969. Then afterward I realized that the 20th century started in 1901. Meaning the sixth ended in 1961. Deepest apologies, big hypocrite moment.
Tridead 1 year ago
17 people still think that the moon landing was fake
n987 1 year ago
this is truly a huge masterpiece!
MakaBeatz 1 year ago
it fires my rocket
pzkipper 1 year ago 3
18 pplz r h8rs this is epic!
megan17020 1 year ago
@topwomble The like button thing.
aptanalogy 1 year ago
dude, i have to say that melodysheep is one of the most awesomesauce people ever...
fearissayingdie 1 year ago 4
Mankind used to be so ambitious about space exploration. We would have been on Mars by now if we had stayed on track, and possibly on route to Gleise 581c.
akustika25 1 year ago 2
@akustika25 Well the money involved would blow our budget by billions. My other thought is, why would we do that when we have a robot there already? Unless there's something on it's surface that requires human observation. But yes, I'd love human space exploration to keep pushing the boundaries.
toocaran 1 year ago
I'm surprised I haven't seen a comment yet about how the moon landing was faked... Thank god.
nhmllr725 1 year ago 47
@nhmllr725 I saw one months ago
kokofan50 1 year ago
@nhmllr725 I was going to mention that - and it's not about fake landing, but fake camera shoots.
adlozi 1 year ago
@nhmllr725 I was just about to say that...I have an older friend who experienced our first journey to another object in the solar system, I am so jealous. Not for the time, but for the attitudes people have these days regarding the costly exercise of human exploration of the cosmos. It's so worth it, what can make people understand it? I fear only a threat to our existence, and maybe then it will be too late.
rounder421 1 year ago
@nhmllr725 See what you've done? Now people are discussing it.
This is just like when people mention how there are 0 dislikes on a video, then someone dislikes it. Don't you guys realize people just want to spite each other on the internet and giggle to themselves?
zrhealey 10 months ago
@nhmllr725 The landing on the moon was a fake like all other american propaganda!!! Happy now?
calimerovisa 10 months ago
@nhmllr725 Nah. but 9/11 was an inside job.
kidkong584 10 months ago
@nhmllr725 The pictures are fake.
adlozi 10 months ago
@nhmllr725 Haha same here. The only conspiracy I believe is the 9/11 one.
kidkong584 9 months ago
@nhmllr725 Yes we did go to the moon, global warming is a man made menace, all the wars in middle east were not about the oil and god is real as you and me. On the false statement department we still have bigfoot, the illuminati, tomorrow's end of the world, fairies, el chupacabra, unicorns, Thor, Spiderman, Humpty Dumpty, the smurfies, the tooth fairy, the 3 lil piggies and my sexy hollywood-actress girlfriend
I hope that's good enough. See you on the moon colonies... not! ;-)
Zaltor2 9 months ago
@nhmllr725 Thank who?
B^)
Peace.
PJW1269 9 months ago
Comment removed
Galentw 1 year ago 57
@Galentw
You accurately describe what I dream about when I sleep
FissionNonStop 1 year ago
@Galentw I was that optimistic once
IneptTroopr 1 year ago
@Galentw Except that prolonged exposure to the low gravity would kill the moon people..............
Southparker100000000 1 year ago
@Southparker100000000
With today's technology and medicine, yes, but in 500 years... :)
AlexandruUrsachi 1 year ago
@AlexandruUrsachi
Doubt the human species will even be around that long.
Southparker100000000 1 year ago
@Southparker100000000
There is always the posibility that we will destroy ourselves. But there is also the posibility that we won't.
AlexandruUrsachi 1 year ago
@AlexandruUrsachi According to logical analysis of the Drake Equation, we don't have long.
Southparker100000000 1 year ago
@Southparker100000000
According to the "Great Filter" within the Fermi Paradox, there is one more step we have to take, so that long term survival can be achieved, and that's space colonisation. Also, it took 4 bilion years of random mutations and events on this planet to get to us. Considering the size of the universe, it's higly unlikely that two civilisations can arise within space-time reach of each other., so that they would be aware of the other's existence.
AlexandruUrsachi 1 year ago
@AlexandruUrsachi There are roughly 200 billion planets in this galaxy that can support life, 100 billion of which most likely have life, The fact that no technological civilization exists other than Earth, anywhere as far as we know, despite all the searching, suggests that technologically advanced species have a very short life span in the cosmos. If we colonize space, we'll just be exporting our problems and delaying the inevitable, we should make our home better, rather than find a new one.
Southparker100000000 1 year ago
@Southparker100000000
Finding a new home can make our home world better :) First of all, this planet can't sustain our population growth forever, neither can it provide us with unlimidet resources. Second of all, the new technologies and off-Earth resources can benefit the inhabitants of this planet. The fact that another civilisation hasn't been detected means what I've said earlier: inteligent life is a rare thing in the cosmos. Whatever the "end" may be, the goal of life is to live, not die
AlexandruUrsachi 1 year ago
@AlexandruUrsachi We actually have plenty of the resources we need, the problem though is with corporate "planned obsolescence", When the issues we have on Earth are sorted out, we should explore the cosmos of space with all the zeal the endeavor truly does deserve, but until then, it's only counter productive.
Southparker100000000 1 year ago
@Southparker100000000
Check out this video: The Sagan Series: Life looks for Life. And you will see what exactly is holding this planet back, and it's not space exploration.
AlexandruUrsachi 1 year ago
@AlexandruUrsachi That is a straw-man fallacy, I did not claim that space exploration was holding us back, merely that until we can maintain our own planet how can we hope to maintain a foreign one. Please refrain from using straw-man fallacies, it is intellectual fraud.
Southparker100000000 1 year ago
@Southparker100000000
Then my apologies for misunderstanding your statement. I agree, we shouldn't try to colonise another world until we learn how to live efficiently on our own, but we should continue to explore space, manned and robotically, in parallel with improving our own world
AlexandruUrsachi 1 year ago
@Galentw You can see Lake Tycho, Armstrong City, New Berlin.
quietjedi1010101 10 months ago
@Galentw I won't be alive in 500 years.
Spyker619 10 months ago
@Galentw probably more like 100 years from now :p
ParadigmShift22 10 months ago
@ParadigmShift22 Not if NASA is shut down.
raptors222222 10 months ago
17 people
JoNnYShizzle 1 year ago
How could 17 people dislike this?
Ironically, 17 was the last Apollo mission to the moon.
GreatExterminator 1 year ago
@GreatExterminator 17 people must die !
cosmicskydaddy 1 year ago
Cool -- but 1969 is in the 7th decade of the 20th century, not the 6th.
EnnySuggestions 1 year ago 2
It's nice, but I would very much like to see something new from Symphony of Science.
les777pl 1 year ago
@les777pl hes working on it
kokofan50 1 year ago
I dont like this as much as your other videos because the clips are not tuned to be singing.. Funny because these songs are the only good justification for auto tune ever.
redsunpro 1 year ago
又來了！科學交響樂團新作！
luyang1123 1 year ago
@luyang1123 再次是!
cosmicskydaddy 1 year ago
Melodysheep is that your original music? Very Cool!!
glendagable 1 year ago
@glendagable Yep it's his :)
hanslol 1 year ago
super music, excellent clips. :)
jezzy0001 1 year ago
The moon is a monument to human potential
pkscolax 1 year ago