Though it is hilarious, it is historically inaccurate. The romans did not give a thumbs-up when they approved of the performance or when they were deciding a gladiator's fate. Instead, they would open their palm, facing down. The thumbs-up symbol, in ancient Rome, was a phallic symbol, a rather rude, sexual gesture a man might make toward a woman. Almost the Roman equivalent of a "heeey, baby!"
@BlackKat71 YOURE A FUCKING NEEK. who seriusly gives a shit? do we really care.. it was funny and thats all that matters you fucking idiot. i hate people like you.. always trying to prove something or someone wrong.. go fuck youreself
@ardzman123 It's clear enough that you have nothing better to do than curse those who happen to be more intelligent than you, like some baser animal. And I'm sure there are people out there intelligent enough to "give a shit" about a cool fact like that. YOU may not care, but your sentiment is in no way universal. To assume that you're feelings are the norm requires an unfathomable amount of arrogance. I suggest you try some humility.
@BlackKat71 Actually, that's wrong. In Rome its true they didn't give a thumbs up when they approved of the performance, they gave a thumbs up if the person was to live or die. Thumbs up meant he could live, thumbs down meant the Gladiator could kill him.
I believe that many old historians have recorded this also, though I can't remember exactly which one.
@QuantumRadish Now that I think about it, you might be right. I'm not entirely sure. I've studied it, but I don't have a great memory. You're probably right. Thanks for the insight!
This isn't important but there was no all powerful emperor who had this sort of role in 52 bc - this practice was adopted long after the Roman Republic.
what about pharoun, or even nemrod and Khulqanain and the roman leader Qaiser we call him all these 3 ruled the whole world and they were single people.
No, I'm telling you, Rome never ruled over Persia. In fact there were instances where Rome paid Persia a yearly payment so that Persia would not attack it.
This is where you're a fool. Before Christ, Rome followed Mithraism. Mithra being the Zoroastrian God (from Persia). Rome 'never' ruled over Persia. Rome was actually greatly influenced by Persia. For example...the famous Roman Aqueducts are copies of Persian designs.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i don't think so, why are Persians so arrogant the Persians were influence by Rome, romans had a big impact to Persian history. yes perisan had a longer stability than rome but Alexandra the Great did rule persia if you dont believe me read historical poems they mention Alexandra the Great and hes battle.
why don't most Persian expect the fact that there had been ruled over, i cant imagine anyone wanting to like Persia or copy them in any way, they are quiet ugly peoples,
Persians aren't Arrogant. Persians aren't retarded. You just said "ALEXANDRA THE GREAT" ruled Persia, and that he WAS ROMAN.
Lol...Let me clear a few things up. Macedonia = Greece. Sparta = Greece. None of those are Roman. Alexander was a GREEK. He ruled the GREEK Empire. ROME is very VERY different.
If you want to know more about the GREEK victory over Persia, I can more than educate you on the topic. Learn your countries before trying to debate with me. We racists are smart. ;)
actually macedonians were not considered greek at that time, but it was a heavy debate and still is today. macedonians were barbarians, however the royalty (philip-alexander's father) claimed he had greek heritage and that he was a descendant of heracles so that justified his son's conquest into the near east (persia) with greece (aka hellenes as it was called back then) as an ally.
Yeah I actually bring that up anytime a Greek guy tries to show off about Alexander. :P But for the sake of removing race from the equation, Alexander of Macedon was a Greek citizen, so it was a fitting statement for the discussion at hand.
But yes, I agree with you and you are right. He wasn't "Ethnically/Racially Greek."
first of all they aren't GREEK... they were HELLENES, and furthermore they were city states back then not a whole entity. The main one being Athens, which considered Macedonia as barbarian (which is where Alexander NOT Alexandra is from) if you've read any of Isocrates or Demosthenes' work you will clearly see that ...but you already knew all that right..? :P
Actually, the kingdom of macedon then, by the time of alexeander, his father and his forefathers for quite some time, was a greek kingdom, or hellenestic. No one from athen considerd king Philip or alexander to be a barbarian.
@kefkahkefkah no they didn't, but they considered the Macedonians as barbarians, or even worse than that. If you read Demosthenes' 'against Phillip', you can see how they felt about them. King Phillip and Alexander only justified being "Greek" and detached themselves from the barbarian label is because they claimed that they were descendants of Heracles.
Fyi...if Persians are 'ugly people,' why did Alexander force all his commanders to get Persian wives? Why did he try so hard to blend both the Greek and Persian cultures? Why was he so obsessed with Persia that he adopted many of their customs, and worshiped one of their Gods, Mithra?
You, my friend, are horrible at history. Besides...Persian women are the most beautiful in the world. And I think I look much better than you, myself. ;)
Hitler said...the Two Aryan Nations. Iran + Germany.
thats why maybe no iranian women has ever won the beauti contest, cause there faces look like plastic.
and secdondary who the hell said anything about alexandra wanting iranian wifes he was gay, dont you know that. alexandra the great was gay so if he wanted children i dont think it will be from iranians and there is no real source to that as well
No Iranian would spread such false lies about the land where for thousands of years his countrymen...who share the same blood as him...have fought and died for.
the last roman empero killed hes wife and turned a man into a women and made him hes wife Niuo was the last king who did this.
there is no such think as fully gay and gay, bisexual is also gay but the only difference is a bi man would do womens as well and a gay man will find it hard or impossible.
every people on earth is bisexual, but choses if they is gay or hetero in their own subconscious, so if a man is gay, so is it his subconscios, a gay can be hetero if he really really wanted it, it was proven on a program on discovery, and if you think over it, it can be true:P
Wow....this is great man......... YOU FUCKED ALL ROMANS
SuperNedairani 4 weeks ago
I LOVE THIS MAN
94nonogirl 3 months ago
hed have been a much better ceesar
cal11182 7 months ago
get a grip and go take your period somewhere else
davitar123 8 months ago
Ok if my emperor could climb with his freaking hands that 5 meters tall smooth wall I'd be definitely cheering up!
SuperGoldenPony 1 year ago
Though it is hilarious, it is historically inaccurate. The romans did not give a thumbs-up when they approved of the performance or when they were deciding a gladiator's fate. Instead, they would open their palm, facing down. The thumbs-up symbol, in ancient Rome, was a phallic symbol, a rather rude, sexual gesture a man might make toward a woman. Almost the Roman equivalent of a "heeey, baby!"
BlackKat71 1 year ago 3
@BlackKat71 YOURE A FUCKING NEEK. who seriusly gives a shit? do we really care.. it was funny and thats all that matters you fucking idiot. i hate people like you.. always trying to prove something or someone wrong.. go fuck youreself
ardzman123 1 year ago
@ardzman123 It's clear enough that you have nothing better to do than curse those who happen to be more intelligent than you, like some baser animal. And I'm sure there are people out there intelligent enough to "give a shit" about a cool fact like that. YOU may not care, but your sentiment is in no way universal. To assume that you're feelings are the norm requires an unfathomable amount of arrogance. I suggest you try some humility.
BlackKat71 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
ardzman123 1 year ago
@ardzman123 And I never said it wasn't funny. Indeed, it was.
BlackKat71 1 year ago
@ardzman123 shut up and get a life. pick on someone ur own size, if the is any1...
umar769 1 year ago
@BlackKat71 Actually, that's wrong. In Rome its true they didn't give a thumbs up when they approved of the performance, they gave a thumbs up if the person was to live or die. Thumbs up meant he could live, thumbs down meant the Gladiator could kill him.
I believe that many old historians have recorded this also, though I can't remember exactly which one.
Writergurl24 11 months ago
@Writergurl24
I believe that is a popular misconception and that thumbs up meant death and thumbs down mens they are spared. I may be wrong though.
QuantumRadish 8 months ago 4
@QuantumRadish You are not wrong, it is indeed a misconception.
TheMrVengeance 8 months ago
@QuantumRadish Now that I think about it, you might be right. I'm not entirely sure. I've studied it, but I don't have a great memory. You're probably right. Thanks for the insight!
Writergurl24 6 months ago
he was actually in Ridley Scott's Gladiator 2000
bazle64 1 year ago
@ angolan1, you are an ASS and shut the fuck off
abreeful 1 year ago
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!
SanitaryGrounds 1 year ago
his laugh lol
dudertron1 2 years ago 8
what a nutter, lol!
Vannereveilar 2 years ago 5
funny about all this documentary stuff when in actual fact its about omid making fun of caesar its comedy not a debate
metalfreakenwierdo 2 years ago 3
god how old is this debate now.
yes sir it was Nero.
badsha01 2 years ago
lol
alex091094 2 years ago
is the documentry you guys are talking about called rome rise and fall of an empire? because i saw it in that.
14Teutonic 2 years ago
u kinda are...
logan21995 2 years ago
I laughed so much at this when I saw this on the telly.
raellos 3 years ago
wtf just watch the stuff dont freaking debate r-tard
logan21995 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
(sulking) I'm not a r-tard
IddyB 2 years ago
Lol seriously i'm laughin myself insane with these comments, THIS IS Omid Djalili PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!. just sit back and enjoy it.
Nightwalkershalo 3 years ago 5
baahhaha great comment
theflyingtomato456 3 years ago
This isn't important but there was no all powerful emperor who had this sort of role in 52 bc - this practice was adopted long after the Roman Republic.
danny88101 3 years ago
what about pharoun, or even nemrod and Khulqanain and the roman leader Qaiser we call him all these 3 ruled the whole world and they were single people.
badsha01 3 years ago
Rome never ruled Persia.
Theologist 3 years ago
not the rome you know it as, but once in roman history it did defeat the persians only once.
badsha01 3 years ago
No, I'm telling you, Rome never ruled over Persia. In fact there were instances where Rome paid Persia a yearly payment so that Persia would not attack it.
Theologist 3 years ago
listen rome ruled but did not conquer persia, these alot of roman influence in persia like fire worshipping and paganism i talking before christ.
badsha01 3 years ago
This is where you're a fool. Before Christ, Rome followed Mithraism. Mithra being the Zoroastrian God (from Persia). Rome 'never' ruled over Persia. Rome was actually greatly influenced by Persia. For example...the famous Roman Aqueducts are copies of Persian designs.
Don't talk about things you've never studied. :)
Theologist 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i don't think so, why are Persians so arrogant the Persians were influence by Rome, romans had a big impact to Persian history. yes perisan had a longer stability than rome but Alexandra the Great did rule persia if you dont believe me read historical poems they mention Alexandra the Great and hes battle.
why don't most Persian expect the fact that there had been ruled over, i cant imagine anyone wanting to like Persia or copy them in any way, they are quiet ugly peoples,
badsha01 3 years ago
i prefer making friends with the Free Masons and i would know i be in safer hands than the Persians.
badsha01 3 years ago
i thought persia was destroyed by alexander the great and who replaced them was the ummm parthians thats it, or am i wrong
arl1991 3 years ago
no one couldestroy persia they were very strong at thre time that even the romans had trouble.
badsha01 3 years ago 5
Yeah, but then Gerard Butler came with 300 American Spartans and fucked their shit up real nice.
IddyB 2 years ago
Persians aren't Arrogant. Persians aren't retarded. You just said "ALEXANDRA THE GREAT" ruled Persia, and that he WAS ROMAN.
Lol...Let me clear a few things up. Macedonia = Greece. Sparta = Greece. None of those are Roman. Alexander was a GREEK. He ruled the GREEK Empire. ROME is very VERY different.
If you want to know more about the GREEK victory over Persia, I can more than educate you on the topic. Learn your countries before trying to debate with me. We racists are smart. ;)
Theologist 3 years ago 2
actually macedonians were not considered greek at that time, but it was a heavy debate and still is today. macedonians were barbarians, however the royalty (philip-alexander's father) claimed he had greek heritage and that he was a descendant of heracles so that justified his son's conquest into the near east (persia) with greece (aka hellenes as it was called back then) as an ally.
tazzynazzy 2 years ago
Yeah I actually bring that up anytime a Greek guy tries to show off about Alexander. :P But for the sake of removing race from the equation, Alexander of Macedon was a Greek citizen, so it was a fitting statement for the discussion at hand.
But yes, I agree with you and you are right. He wasn't "Ethnically/Racially Greek."
Theologist 2 years ago
thats some nicely done history
slam2dunkz63 2 years ago
first of all they aren't GREEK... they were HELLENES, and furthermore they were city states back then not a whole entity. The main one being Athens, which considered Macedonia as barbarian (which is where Alexander NOT Alexandra is from) if you've read any of Isocrates or Demosthenes' work you will clearly see that ...but you already knew all that right..? :P
tazzynazzy 1 year ago 6
@tazzynazzy
Actually, the kingdom of macedon then, by the time of alexeander, his father and his forefathers for quite some time, was a greek kingdom, or hellenestic. No one from athen considerd king Philip or alexander to be a barbarian.
kefkahkefkah 1 year ago
@kefkahkefkah no they didn't, but they considered the Macedonians as barbarians, or even worse than that. If you read Demosthenes' 'against Phillip', you can see how they felt about them. King Phillip and Alexander only justified being "Greek" and detached themselves from the barbarian label is because they claimed that they were descendants of Heracles.
tazzynazzy 1 year ago
Fyi...if Persians are 'ugly people,' why did Alexander force all his commanders to get Persian wives? Why did he try so hard to blend both the Greek and Persian cultures? Why was he so obsessed with Persia that he adopted many of their customs, and worshiped one of their Gods, Mithra?
You, my friend, are horrible at history. Besides...Persian women are the most beautiful in the world. And I think I look much better than you, myself. ;)
Hitler said...the Two Aryan Nations. Iran + Germany.
Theologist 3 years ago 3
thats why maybe no iranian women has ever won the beauti contest, cause there faces look like plastic.
and secdondary who the hell said anything about alexandra wanting iranian wifes he was gay, dont you know that. alexandra the great was gay so if he wanted children i dont think it will be from iranians and there is no real source to that as well
badsha01 3 years ago
It must be fun to make up false statements and present them as facts. Try 'reading' history instead of making up bullshit.
And FYI, there have been many Iranian beauty contest winners over the past 5 or 6 years across both Europe and the Americas.
Don't even bother talking, Badsha. You're probably just some Paki-Arabic semeto-dravidian reject trash. Go read a book or something.
Theologist 3 years ago 2
im half iranian and half florida, cant you tell by my name? its farsi but i cant speak the language too hard for me.
badsha01 3 years ago
No Iranian would spread such false lies about the land where for thousands of years his countrymen...who share the same blood as him...have fought and died for.
Theologist 3 years ago 2
no he wasnt gay
most ancient greeks were known to be camp
and sleep with men
but they werent ever fully gay
more like bi
seein as he did hav children
FloppyChris 3 years ago
the last roman empero killed hes wife and turned a man into a women and made him hes wife Niuo was the last king who did this.
there is no such think as fully gay and gay, bisexual is also gay but the only difference is a bi man would do womens as well and a gay man will find it hard or impossible.
but there is no point debating
badsha01 3 years ago
u basically just said theres no such thing as bein gay
u muppet
FloppyChris 2 years ago
ur a fool look and read again
badsha01 2 years ago
oh i remember watching documentary on that , i was like wtf when he was like " Make him a woman" was like O.o srlys dude.
elfmann243 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
every people on earth is bisexual, but choses if they is gay or hetero in their own subconscious, so if a man is gay, so is it his subconscios, a gay can be hetero if he really really wanted it, it was proven on a program on discovery, and if you think over it, it can be true:P
filthc 2 years ago
0:37
AHAHAAHAAHAAAAH
xD
DJMikDeez 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
i hate pakis except for him and russel peters
rock on
gguuttthhhiiixxx
urs in chrst
hovhak
grungerh8 3 years ago
And explain to me why and I'll give you a medal.
d06omtas 3 years ago
he's not Paki. he's Persian. you are nowhere near his level.
p1m4 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
wow russell peters is indian and omid djalili is persian ur a dumb honkey bitch
angolan1 3 years ago 22
@angolan1 quite like the mistake the Americans made after 9/11.....
brahmdeep121 1 year ago
@angolan1 he is Iranian
1993aidan1993 1 year ago 2
@1993aidan1993 same thing dude, and i would know because im perisna
angolan1 1 year ago
what a twat you are.....lol
aleebaabaa 3 years ago
That laugh of his truely classic :)
Azard3 3 years ago 5
FUNNY! hehe
Frank1sten 3 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
this was not funny at all mate. bloody hell
sethownsallofyou 3 years ago
Then you have no sense of humor at all...
leotveter 3 years ago 3
It worries a nation if the king is indecisive. It is more worrying if the king starts to dance like the local idiot with something stuck up his ass.
NazriB 3 years ago 2
he was actually in gladiator wasnt her
AlexFictionFriction 3 years ago 3
the mummy
italirish 3 years ago
Omid also had a bit part in Gladiator, as a slave trader.
piedlourde 3 years ago 3
in a britney spears music video as well, i'd say he's famous
dudemanboyperson 3 years ago
Stole the Gladiator's thunder lol. funny
J0L0G 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
this guy isnt even funny
nymphet666 4 years ago
love the laughs!!!!!!!
LOL
roligare 4 years ago 38
This has been flagged as spam show
FAT BASTARD
SUPACHICHI900 4 years ago
I only have two words "COMEDY GENIUS" ! ! !
Romanmoga1992 4 years ago 21
LMAO, his laughs are marvelous
obliviouspet 4 years ago 9
absolutely class
hassmaq 4 years ago 7
Absolutley frickin' fabulous
starlightgirl 4 years ago 6
LOL genius
hm14uk 4 years ago 6