Yeah, we'll most likely be waiting till the next generation of consoles before we get anything looking close to this. I'd love to see Farcry 3 looking as good as that jungle/arid environment! Crysis 2 is really spectacular though, no matter the console focus, best looking console game imo.
CAN WE HAVE a benchmark for GPU only results? and another for CPU/GPU and leave phisiscs out for now? its so hard to compare system scores across the internet
Compare this to Epic's latest engine. People were oohing and awwing over it yet I thought it looked like a mild improvement. It doesn't look half as good as these scenes, which are all rendered real-time on PCs.
If we didn't have these crappy ports we could all be playing games that looked like this and better on our PCs.
@boredgunner Not to be rude, but yeah, that was exactly my point. Epic is known for making console friendly engines and their latest engine is pathetic yet b/c we are so used to ugly games that run on 5 year old hardware we think it looks great. This gives a glimpse into what games would look like RIGHT NOW if we didn't have to cater to the console crowd.
@iEvoss OK well I don't really think it is worth responding to you as you seem to be kind of unintelligent but I will try.
Obviously your statement "it will NEVER be on PC" is wrong. Graphics on PC get better all the time, it will take some time but at least by the time new consoles come out PC games will look BETTER than this.
Anyway there are plenty of games on PC that look really good, check out Battlefield 3 for the latest example of awesome PC graphics.
i u even didnt know what is 3d mark 06 where is that graphic? i want to see it even graphics in 03d mark 06 is still not seen in real gameplay all shitty anime graphics not real ..
Yes only ONE game with a close to reality Crysis 1 that's it .. and even NOT playable on ultra coz no gpu exist to run it without one tear !! u big intelligent ;D
all products from is just BIG FAKE and only stupid intelligent like you will install that and may be buying
@iEvoss I just told you which game has amazing graphics besides Crysis, Battlefield 3. Many other games have a high level of graphical fidelity. In any case you seem to misunderstand the purpose of 3dMark. It is to show you what games will look like in the FUTURE, not the present. Seriously, go read their site, it says so.
@iEvoss I don't know why you are so combative about this. Anyway I would say Battlefield 3 looks BETTER than anything 3dMark06 had. Like I said it is a useful tool for stress testing your video card overclock. I have never actually paid money for it but I have downloaded it before and got a free code for it once. I used it for stress testing. The only thing it is meant to do is show the difference in performance between cards and stress testing, so I don't know what your big problem is.
@iEvoss Like I said, for me its not worth paying for, but that doesn't mean it is useless software. Anyway, I just don't get why you would hate it SOO much.
Delayed AGAIN! Was supposed to have orignaly been released in september, then Nov 30. Now I'ts delayed again they say for at least a few more days or maybe a week! WTF
@ilordvader Different DirectX versions. Different tests. 3DMark 06 is a great CPU bench and limited to DX9. 3DMark Vantage is a good GPU test which runs in DX10. Don't bother with those if you have a DX11 video card and Windows 7. Just get 3DMark 11. It will be the new standard.
All the same lie they used from DX9 to DX10 ... that cost me 599 dolares to after a few months the DX10 are considered a FLOP, with a promise of FIX in 10.1 .. but that fix cost another NEW graphic card... ok... I wont buy it another time.... Sorry. Good games like COD BlackOps, etc... are still DX9... and few games are tweaked to use Dx10 and Dx11...with nothing "magical" and "amazing" ...
@Sssagaman We are Stuck because Devs only care now about consoles and we have just ports with better resolutions and better textures only. Even old cards can still play very well games like COD, etc... Great graphic cards like 400 and 500 series dont use all the power, so they promise DX10 and DX11 to fool the distracted (uninformed ppl) with false promises... they are really killing the PC game... I really miss the old days, just before XBOX360 and PS3.. when games for PC were masterpieces!
yep, and the last game optimized for high end graphics was crysis. Now when the new crysis 2 comes out, it is going to be a shithole compared to the first one. Why? Thats right, because crysis 2 will also be made for CONSOLES and will be ported to pc from CONSOLES that got 5 year old hardware inside.
Consoles were made for gaming and yet they still fail horribly at it. I mean the PS3 still uses 720p and 1080p While some of us PC gamers are using eyefinity with 6 monitors which is like 5600p.
Consoles are cheap as chips and at the end of the day are good if you have a low budget but if you want a decent community that isnt full with british chavs and american 6 year olds playing 18 year old games then you should get PC.
Looks absolutely amazing. Developers need to start designing games on the PC and then port them to console. After all we pay more money and in return get a rubbish port running 2007 graphics.
@DarthJe5us Console crap > 3DMark 11 visually? No, not even close. I bet 3DMark 11 will be more entertaining than Medal of Crysis Warfare 2: Reach Ops as well.
@boredgunner are you retarded?crysis 2 console crap? i'm talking about the cry engine 3 and what can be achieved with it in crysis 2 with dx 11,btw 3dmark 11 is not even a game and how can you call medal of honor,call of duty and halo visually good games,those use cheap lighting effects and are in fact console crap
@DarthJe5us LOL. I didn't say those games look good. I just referred to Crysis 2 as Medal of Crysis Warfare 2: Reach Ops because Crysis 2 is a mixture of all of the titles you see in that name. It will be interesting to see CryEngine 3's capabilities though.
all i know is that no matter how much the game developers like rockstar and sega and epic and whichever are compelling us to get consoles by making console exclusive games i know that their buff to have the best experience of games of HD era is on consoles only isn't gonna work on me now ever.... i sure regret that i can't get to play red dead vanquish n gears franchise because when i played the FPS like MW2 n BFBC2 on my pc..i knew that this is beyond HD n now never can i step back to consoles.
the jungle and the graphics look better than Crysis but unfortunately the games we'll see this is only for four years because the ps3 and xbox 360 are too weak for such a graphics.
Now imagine if it was the crysis animators/artists behind this demo, we'd probably orgasming lol.
The demo in this video is impressive in the amount of details. In terms of simulating the real world? Not so much.
Watching this video makes me go "wow, that runs in real time!?". It doesn't make me think its an actual forest. I'm pretty confident that say the crysis guys could use this amount of graphics power and produce a demo that does make you go "wait, this isn't a video from real forest?"
@QWERTYCommander i mean quality of grafic, man. but youre right. that won't happen since we're playing crossplatform games. we are doomed to play shooters with xbox grafix..
wow, teh jungle looks less impressive than what we see in crysis, ofc i mean variety texture and model quality. Also why is the moon like 10m above the ground ?
Some of the normal maps and models are really unimpressive, time to hire some 3d artist and stop relying on the old team futuremark.
@xFreeman512x the problem is, that the moon is shown just a few meters above the ground => the stars should be at the same position (from the moon) while moving camera
@xFreeman512x the problem is, that the moon is shown just a few meters above the ground => the stars should be at the same position (from the moon) while moving camera
Jizzpantstacular! Looks like a fu**ing movie. Now too bad game developers are still basing everything by consoles and therefore won't be able to interpret this in games :|
F**K developers who BETRAYED PC GAMING in favour of CONSOLE.
They are effectively promoting stupidity by promoting simplicity by taking away the market for enthusiasts; those who effectively LEARN through assembling, customizing and manipulating their GAMING RIGS,
Shame on you developers and publishers. We were the foundation of your growth.
@Aryanpars Are you serious? Industries survive by moving to business models that follow demand, not hanging on to outdated ones.
Console games offer more bang for the buck in terms of life cycle, (when a console can be used for 6 or 7 years), in gaming paradigms (look at the Wii, Kinect, Move, Xbox live), and involvement/value, (the whole family can play on the largest screen in the house) .
If you want to blame anyone, blame Microsoft for not establishing better standards for gaming.
@DOlogunde That is true that industries survive by moving business models toward demand. However, businesses can form the demand themselves by creating a market for an product/service.
The concept of console gaming wasnt intuitively known to people by heart, but it was rather invented. Similarly, Hollywood form culture that can become popular because it capitalizes on human urges and needs.
There are times which demands drive innovation and there are times which innovation drive demand.
@Aryanpars I've been a pc gamer since a kid...but your opinions here are wrong. The foundation for a developer/publishers growth is anyone who is willing to pay $60 for a game. That includes consoles mind you.
and how does a user manipulating hardware and customizing things do anything but mean I need to test my software under more and more diverse scenarios?
@Machuse $60 for games that have their quality at the level of fallout 3 and 4 is just highway robbery. Plain and simple. I get mine 6months or a year after release for way way less and get the same enjoyment. With the added bonus of knowing if the quality is s*it.
@Machuse I am not arguing against console gaming, I am arguing for PC gaming. PC gaming is not be paid attention too. The platform's gaming is not dead, it has grown according to PC Gaming Alliance's research (when they included digital store sales). However if you notice, the PC games that are out there at the moment are primarily console games. You do not get an edge playing it on PC except very minor enhancements. Before, the PC equivalents were alot mightier in term of graphics.
When one person starts to manipulate and assemble their hardware, he/she learns about hardware's relation, the software's involvement and overtime, develop a tendency to appreciate complex systems. This appreciation manifest itself in form of greater patience for learning not just about computer hardware but also computing, math and science.
There is a difference between a PC gamer and an Apple user. The PC gamer, is much more informed about their status of their system ...
Making things too simple, is not a bad thing. The problem is, eliminating opportunity for those who want to progress and see the capacity to move from simple to use systems to more complex ones.
Apple just like consoles, provide very simple to use platform in which the machinery is closed to manipulation. Naturally, people move toward "convenience of use" over more complex ones. Therefore expanding the market for easiness. This is evident in faster growth in console games and
and apple systems. You may have notice the sudden jump in Macbooks and other apple products. This is a sufficient evidence for the rapid growth of market for simple devices.
The unfortunate side to all this is that, once a publisher sees more profit margin in one segment, it would be logical for it to diverts its resources to the most profiting segment to maximize its profit. In the context of gaming, this entails, less and less development for PC gaming which demands more.
@ThrillinAllDay I presented my analysis what is going on and why PC specific content is vanishing. The most appropriate method of dealing with this is to bring hardware manufacturers such as CPU/GPU/MB/RAM/PSU/CASE/Monitor/Mouse/Keyboard onboard because they are also making money within the domain of PC gaming. Destruction of PC specific content means destruction of their market. Luckily PC Gaming Alliance is taking care of corporate domain.
However, as part of a solution, we consumers should be more influential and bold. We should be recognized. One way of doing this is to promote PC gaming, discouraging 'Piracy" and etc...
@Aryanpars You are joking right? Yes, you WERE the foundations. But thanks to piracy and exorbitant development costs, developers target console gaming now. You're telling me that because PC gaming was the basis for the videogame industry 25 years ago, that companies likes Ubisoft and EA should continue developing exclusive PC games even though they will make HUGE losses? They're businesses, not charities.
@JonnyPxN but isnt the consoles are pcs?? inside the consoles are motherboards and everything from a pc right? they still need to improve the pcs to improve the consoles right?.. im just asking cuz right now im really blurr...
Gran Turismo 5 today showed how FUCKED UP console hardware is already today. I was amazed how bad the graphics was, to me Looked like last gen game...Developers should stop making there cross platform shit, cause pc can do much more than a console and they tune down graphics so it can be also playable on consoles, WTF ? Pc owners spend 1000 dollars each year for hardware and they don't deserve normal games ? We still have adgy and blocky characters even in recent games. I won't buy this shit.
@SkylineR33FTW Yes, I know it's ps 3 exclusive..I am talking about other games that could look much better if they were not cross platform.. Crysis 2 for example. GT 5 is just an example how outdated consoles are already. Pc games could use all the benefits of dx 11 and powerfull teraflop video processors, but that won't happen, cause in this case consoles won't be able to run these games... GT 5 inviroment and textures look just awful ! It does not metter you watch it in HD or SD.
Of course we can. It's not a huuuge difference, but you can distinguish a few colors on a decently clear sky. The 3DMark stars just look like white pixels with gaussian blur.
@possum440 The MSI and Antec logo placements are special sponsorship arrangements between those companies and Futuremark. Advertising placements ensure that Futuremark can offer a free Basic Edition of the benchmark alongside the Advanced Edition.
@FuturemarkTV "adv ensures that you'll offer basic edition" what the hell are you talking about, like you don't have enough money to allow us take a look of a trial. stupid everyone is releasing a trial and it's helping for your sells, so stop spit bullshit.
Somebody must do something about those freagin consoles. Why on earth do they keep releasing the worthless machines? They only keep game development from going forward.
They certainly are holding PC graphics back. GPU and CPU power has risen massively since the PS3 and 360 were released, and yet most PC games still look like they were made in the years those two were released in. This is because most developers make the game for one of the consoles, then hastily port it over to PC.
@tipoomaster Because if you put all your effort into the top end graphics...the people who don't buy the newest stuff the day it comes out will not buy your game due to the fact they cannot play it.
By releasing a game that can easily scale (which usually means leaving out the newest features of direct X and all that jazz) you successfully increase your available consumer and thus sales.
And honestly, who gives a fuck about top end graphics....GAMEPLAY > GRAPHICS.
@tipoomaster A good example for it. Black ops doesn't look better than cod4. That's like BFBC2 in perf with horrible graphics too... Crysis is still a very awesome game for graphic? 4 years after the release. 90% of games look crappy. Some games like metro 2033 are truely made for PC. it's 1000% better on PC with physx and maxed graphic. Crysis 2 would be on console and pc. Nvidia paid them to include physx. That save us from another console to pc game with shitty graphics. THATNKS NVIDIA.
@tipoomaster agree. and the games could be 5x nicer with 10x more outdoor view range and still 5x faster but they are not. Eben I have plenty technology idea doing that. But they holding all back on purpose. Not just the card makers, the engine developers too...
@tipoomaster Actually, most games have a several year development cycle so by the time they hit the shelf the current CPU and GPU technology has far exceeded what was available at the time they began development.
You also have to consider that the developers have to code for a mid-range machine since most PC sales are at the low to mid-range of the hardware spectrum. Typically only gamers will buy hardware that can handle something of this caliber.
Both valid points, but ideally a game engine would scale well across all ranges of hardware. Much harder to code for, I know, but nevertheless I feel that most developers just set consoles as their bar and as such PC hardware never achieves its potential. Its been 4-5 years after this generations consoles launched, and memory, GPU, and CPU potential has exploded since then. And yet, improvements in game graphics haven't come close to matching that increase in potential.
@tipoomaster I really don't count console limitations as optimization because even then games can still run like shit on PCs ahead of consoles Ex: GTA IV and From Dust.
I don't see what's hard about coding a game to make full use of your hardware. Ex: Hard Reset (PC Exclusive) makes about 98% use of your GPU while a game like From Dust (console port) would only make use of 30% of your GPU, the performance differences are significant.
Games should have moore destructible objects and flowers should move when i walk over them - you know what i mean :) Such like Crysis had. Moore interaction - EVEN IN COST OF IMMERSE -=STATIC=- LANDSCAPE.. like in Arcania etc..
Looking alot better than the release. Now with dynamic foliage! but seriously, it does look alot better than before. The deep sea one looks interesting
The lighting in the jungle scene is too color saturated. It has an exagerated blue tint and it gives the scene a slight cartoonish look. Also, in the underwater scene the rusted submarine being lit doesn't cast shadows. The lights from the other two submarines cast godrays, but no shadows. Watch carefully 0.51 - 0.53
considering consoles have early directx 9, they're far from the real PC potential...problem is that alot of developpers tend to poorly adapt games from console to PC and that pisses me off...i'll get an HD6970 soon so bring it on with sweet eye candy!
@xenol Nah, u can easily recreate that in Crysis with the tools released for the game. Check this jungle scene, rendered in realtime: vimeo(dt)com/14480956
Like a scary movie o.o
326Sten 1 week ago
All this badass graphics for 281 mb?
i´m gettin right now
gmxgamer 1 month ago
I can't wait for games to look like this.
boredgunner 4 months ago
futermark should make games. They would look awesome
awesomepers0n 4 months ago
this makes Crysis look like tetris.
Griesmayer 5 months ago
i'm glad i didn't pay money for this.
ItWasntMe456 8 months ago
w.youtube.com/watch?v=s41yPePAGPo
BigArtek1 9 months ago
Yeah, we'll most likely be waiting till the next generation of consoles before we get anything looking close to this. I'd love to see Farcry 3 looking as good as that jungle/arid environment! Crysis 2 is really spectacular though, no matter the console focus, best looking console game imo.
SonicTheHedgeTrimmir 9 months ago
why dont games look like this yet?
gmiwoj 10 months ago
@gmiwoj Metro 2033 maxed comes close. :)
Droogie128 8 months ago
@gmiwoj Because of fucking console ports. thats why.
douglasdtlltd 8 months ago
@douglasdtlltd
true
gmiwoj 8 months ago
what is the best site when you gonna download this? the free one.
XtreamBFSquad 10 months ago
My graphics would explode in games like this xD-ASUS EAH4350
Mark124816 1 year ago
I got P5524 with "Benchmark test only/Performance/Demo) my rig.. i7 960, Geforce GTX 580, 12GB 2000Mhz DDR3
johnnypffT 1 year ago
amazing video
mukhsanain 1 year ago
ID software with Carmack could do these graphics if they want I think... cause Carmack can everything x)
loveSc7 1 year ago
Imagine if you showed this tech demo at like GDC 1998... XD
Miiaku 1 year ago 10
Hmpf... an average FPS of 11,5 on Performance Settings (with a little bite Anisotrop).. I would say that I have raped my Sapphire Radeon HD 5770.
Would you agree?
DasMirkoLP 1 year ago
i got a score of p4764 3d marks with the free demo version which only runs at 1280x720...
points2shopPROOF 1 year ago
I think I need to change my pants.
ShadowwwLFS 1 year ago 3
CAN WE HAVE a benchmark for GPU only results? and another for CPU/GPU and leave phisiscs out for now? its so hard to compare system scores across the internet
caskachan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
everybody type gift before youtube and then press enter to win stuff :D
ReZoNoLiCiOuS 1 year ago
This is what Crysis 2 should look
d0krealone 1 year ago
@d0krealone It's funny you should says that because just as I watched the start of the video I though to myself:"Eh kinda looks like Crysis"
sunyboy333 1 year ago
Photorealistic games are just around the corner ^^
LostBlossom 1 year ago
one day a far cry game will look like this XD
dubmywub 1 year ago
i would so much buy a game with graphics like this! even if it meant i would have to get a new pc ;)
xXZombiFreakXx 1 year ago
Futuremark, i think you've definitely recovered from the vantage fiasco, well done.
Now, if you make a game based on this kind of engine i think everyone will love you forever.
Bobzilla183 1 year ago 5
New release date confirmed - set your alarms for 14:00 GMT on Tuesday December 7, 2010.
FuturemarkTV 1 year ago 6
@FuturemarkTV My birthdate :O
MrCocaines 10 months ago
Futuremark, why don't you make more games? PLEASE MAKE MORE PC GAMES? Shattered Horizon is great, but nobody plays (except some bots).
ygierick 1 year ago
so fu**ing amazing!
LauertdasVerderben 1 year ago
Compare this to Epic's latest engine. People were oohing and awwing over it yet I thought it looked like a mild improvement. It doesn't look half as good as these scenes, which are all rendered real-time on PCs.
If we didn't have these crappy ports we could all be playing games that looked like this and better on our PCs.
mygaffer 1 year ago 33
@mygaffer Well UE3 is widely used on consoles as well. But yeah it brings nothing new to PC gaming.
boredgunner 1 year ago
@boredgunner Not to be rude, but yeah, that was exactly my point. Epic is known for making console friendly engines and their latest engine is pathetic yet b/c we are so used to ugly games that run on 5 year old hardware we think it looks great. This gives a glimpse into what games would look like RIGHT NOW if we didn't have to cater to the console crowd.
mygaffer 1 year ago
Comment removed
xFreeman512x 1 year ago
@mygaffer this is just total bullshit and shittiest software ever
why they showing us this crap when it will NEVER be on PC
Only STUPID people would buy this piece of s*it !!
fake and fake
where are fkin games with graphics like this?
go the f hell idiots makers u just want money nothing else ..!!
iEvoss 2 months ago
@iEvoss OK well I don't really think it is worth responding to you as you seem to be kind of unintelligent but I will try.
Obviously your statement "it will NEVER be on PC" is wrong. Graphics on PC get better all the time, it will take some time but at least by the time new consoles come out PC games will look BETTER than this.
Anyway there are plenty of games on PC that look really good, check out Battlefield 3 for the latest example of awesome PC graphics.
mygaffer 2 months ago
@mygaffer
heh you are BIG intelligent :)
i u even didnt know what is 3d mark 06 where is that graphic? i want to see it even graphics in 03d mark 06 is still not seen in real gameplay all shitty anime graphics not real ..
Yes only ONE game with a close to reality Crysis 1 that's it .. and even NOT playable on ultra coz no gpu exist to run it without one tear !! u big intelligent ;D
all products from is just BIG FAKE and only stupid intelligent like you will install that and may be buying
iEvoss 2 months ago
@iEvoss I just told you which game has amazing graphics besides Crysis, Battlefield 3. Many other games have a high level of graphical fidelity. In any case you seem to misunderstand the purpose of 3dMark. It is to show you what games will look like in the FUTURE, not the present. Seriously, go read their site, it says so.
mygaffer 2 months ago
@mygaffer and i just told you
that future never come what u talking about since 3d mark 03 .. you say will look when?
am waiting almost 10 years and still nothing
iEvoss 2 months ago
@iEvoss Games today look waaay better than 3dMark03's demos did.
mygaffer 1 month ago
@mygaffer yeahh i can say but 3d 06 not barely
this company is just for stupid lads who they think it's cool this soft and they buy it for astronomical prices
it's just burn in test dressed in frightening graphics ..
iEvoss 1 month ago
@iEvoss I don't know why you are so combative about this. Anyway I would say Battlefield 3 looks BETTER than anything 3dMark06 had. Like I said it is a useful tool for stress testing your video card overclock. I have never actually paid money for it but I have downloaded it before and got a free code for it once. I used it for stress testing. The only thing it is meant to do is show the difference in performance between cards and stress testing, so I don't know what your big problem is.
mygaffer 1 month ago
@mygaffer yeah that's the thing when u got it for free u nice to it once u got to pay u will hate it ..
iEvoss 1 month ago
@iEvoss Like I said, for me its not worth paying for, but that doesn't mean it is useless software. Anyway, I just don't get why you would hate it SOO much.
mygaffer 1 month ago
Delayed AGAIN! Was supposed to have orignaly been released in september, then Nov 30. Now I'ts delayed again they say for at least a few more days or maybe a week! WTF
megaman00001 1 year ago
@megaman00001 I know, it better be bug-free when it comes out.
boredgunner 1 year ago
Hi
I buy gaming Laptops
& there are different kinds on there site- 3dmark. c om
whic one should we get all 3 or................?
whats the difference ?
ilordvader 1 year ago
@ilordvader Different DirectX versions. Different tests. 3DMark 06 is a great CPU bench and limited to DX9. 3DMark Vantage is a good GPU test which runs in DX10. Don't bother with those if you have a DX11 video card and Windows 7. Just get 3DMark 11. It will be the new standard.
boredgunner 1 year ago
@boredgunner
THANKYOU
I Very Much Appreciate What You Wrote
I understand it better now
God Bless You
ilordvader 1 year ago
All the same lie they used from DX9 to DX10 ... that cost me 599 dolares to after a few months the DX10 are considered a FLOP, with a promise of FIX in 10.1 .. but that fix cost another NEW graphic card... ok... I wont buy it another time.... Sorry. Good games like COD BlackOps, etc... are still DX9... and few games are tweaked to use Dx10 and Dx11...with nothing "magical" and "amazing" ...
segr3do 1 year ago
@segr3do
Thats a real shame! Devs just dont want to make true DX11 games. I am glad there is Metro 2033, Dirt2 and F1 2010. But thats not enough...
Sssagaman 1 year ago
@Sssagaman We are Stuck because Devs only care now about consoles and we have just ports with better resolutions and better textures only. Even old cards can still play very well games like COD, etc... Great graphic cards like 400 and 500 series dont use all the power, so they promise DX10 and DX11 to fool the distracted (uninformed ppl) with false promises... they are really killing the PC game... I really miss the old days, just before XBOX360 and PS3.. when games for PC were masterpieces!
segr3do 1 year ago
Looks like consoles are the biggest graphical and computational Cock-Blocks in PC gaming history.
=P
Miiaku 1 year ago
yep, and the last game optimized for high end graphics was crysis. Now when the new crysis 2 comes out, it is going to be a shithole compared to the first one. Why? Thats right, because crysis 2 will also be made for CONSOLES and will be ported to pc from CONSOLES that got 5 year old hardware inside.
zalapasha 1 year ago 3
Let's hope that soon consoles will have enough power to use such babies like this.
darkitachi50 1 year ago
Consoles were made for gaming and yet they still fail horribly at it. I mean the PS3 still uses 720p and 1080p While some of us PC gamers are using eyefinity with 6 monitors which is like 5600p.
Consoles are cheap as chips and at the end of the day are good if you have a low budget but if you want a decent community that isnt full with british chavs and american 6 year olds playing 18 year old games then you should get PC.
BlackPheonix81 1 year ago
Looks absolutely amazing. Developers need to start designing games on the PC and then port them to console. After all we pay more money and in return get a rubbish port running 2007 graphics.
BlackPheonix81 1 year ago 2
pc needs to be pushed & games should be scaling to your specs..
Thet3 1 year ago
that's nice for real time rendering. I wonder what the newest gen GPU's can render this at
audiotranceable 1 year ago
crysis2 > 3dmark 11 ;D
this still looks pretty nice
DarthJe5us 1 year ago
@DarthJe5us Console crap > 3DMark 11 visually? No, not even close. I bet 3DMark 11 will be more entertaining than Medal of Crysis Warfare 2: Reach Ops as well.
boredgunner 1 year ago
@boredgunner are you retarded?crysis 2 console crap? i'm talking about the cry engine 3 and what can be achieved with it in crysis 2 with dx 11,btw 3dmark 11 is not even a game and how can you call medal of honor,call of duty and halo visually good games,those use cheap lighting effects and are in fact console crap
DarthJe5us 1 year ago
@DarthJe5us LOL. I didn't say those games look good. I just referred to Crysis 2 as Medal of Crysis Warfare 2: Reach Ops because Crysis 2 is a mixture of all of the titles you see in that name. It will be interesting to see CryEngine 3's capabilities though.
boredgunner 1 year ago
all i know is that no matter how much the game developers like rockstar and sega and epic and whichever are compelling us to get consoles by making console exclusive games i know that their buff to have the best experience of games of HD era is on consoles only isn't gonna work on me now ever.... i sure regret that i can't get to play red dead vanquish n gears franchise because when i played the FPS like MW2 n BFBC2 on my pc..i knew that this is beyond HD n now never can i step back to consoles.
nix253 1 year ago
I hope that the recent news from Microsoft promise a new life for PC gaming, even though I think it has it's problems.
JX46 1 year ago
@JX46 still, humans learned from mistakes..
munirss 1 year ago
the jungle and the graphics look better than Crysis but unfortunately the games we'll see this is only for four years because the ps3 and xbox 360 are too weak for such a graphics.
hinsten 1 year ago
Wow, very, very nice! Near cinema quality! I really dig the bokeh and lens flare effects, they add a lot to the visual look and feel of the shots.
loocasduber 1 year ago
1 fps on my GTX 460 I guess.
Nightcover 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch?v=9K0964BRZZE
FRoloB 1 year ago
@FRoloB WTF man! Some dance, disco shit that has nothing to do with this vid!
loocasduber 1 year ago
vittu mitä paskaa..
millon markkinavoimat tajuavat ettei tuon tyyppinen product placement toimi.
Bmeson 1 year ago
I want metroid with these graphics
Yggdrasill4 1 year ago
Now imagine if it was the crysis animators/artists behind this demo, we'd probably orgasming lol.
The demo in this video is impressive in the amount of details. In terms of simulating the real world? Not so much.
Watching this video makes me go "wow, that runs in real time!?". It doesn't make me think its an actual forest. I'm pretty confident that say the crysis guys could use this amount of graphics power and produce a demo that does make you go "wait, this isn't a video from real forest?"
AlekNovy 1 year ago
foliage should move in unison/waves.
agonizethis 1 year ago
Awesome. Expecting this from crysis2..
Sirius0777 1 year ago
@Sirius0777
But that won't happen, since Crysis 2 is set in New York.
QWERTYCommander 1 year ago
@QWERTYCommander i mean quality of grafic, man. but youre right. that won't happen since we're playing crossplatform games. we are doomed to play shooters with xbox grafix..
Sirius0777 1 year ago
holy shnikes
hornick18 1 year ago
Woooooow! xD
Qoureno 1 year ago
wow, teh jungle looks less impressive than what we see in crysis, ofc i mean variety texture and model quality. Also why is the moon like 10m above the ground ?
Some of the normal maps and models are really unimpressive, time to hire some 3d artist and stop relying on the old team futuremark.
googleslocik 1 year ago
The futur of gaming !
tntantoine 1 year ago
Thumbs up if you need to change your pants
ubrsmcdm 1 year ago
music is pointless
airdog77 1 year ago
ugly moon
xFreeman512x 1 year ago
@xFreeman512x the problem is, that the moon is shown just a few meters above the ground => the stars should be at the same position (from the moon) while moving camera
kamostomp 1 year ago
@kamostomp yeah
xFreeman512x 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xFreeman512x the problem is, that the moon is shown just a few meters above the ground => the stars should be at the same position (from the moon) while moving camera
kamostomp 1 year ago
Call of duty at 1:15. Can't wait
michaelhamil 1 year ago
Jizzpantstacular! Looks like a fu**ing movie. Now too bad game developers are still basing everything by consoles and therefore won't be able to interpret this in games :|
xxl606 1 year ago 2
F**K developers who BETRAYED PC GAMING in favour of CONSOLE.
They are effectively promoting stupidity by promoting simplicity by taking away the market for enthusiasts; those who effectively LEARN through assembling, customizing and manipulating their GAMING RIGS,
Shame on you developers and publishers. We were the foundation of your growth.
Aryanpars 1 year ago 160
@Aryanpars Are you serious? Industries survive by moving to business models that follow demand, not hanging on to outdated ones.
Console games offer more bang for the buck in terms of life cycle, (when a console can be used for 6 or 7 years), in gaming paradigms (look at the Wii, Kinect, Move, Xbox live), and involvement/value, (the whole family can play on the largest screen in the house) .
If you want to blame anyone, blame Microsoft for not establishing better standards for gaming.
DOlogunde 1 year ago
Comment removed
Aryanpars 1 year ago
@DOlogunde That is true that industries survive by moving business models toward demand. However, businesses can form the demand themselves by creating a market for an product/service.
The concept of console gaming wasnt intuitively known to people by heart, but it was rather invented. Similarly, Hollywood form culture that can become popular because it capitalizes on human urges and needs.
There are times which demands drive innovation and there are times which innovation drive demand.
Aryanpars 1 year ago
@Aryanpars boooo f*ckin hoo.
pl1ght 1 year ago
@Aryanpars I've been a pc gamer since a kid...but your opinions here are wrong. The foundation for a developer/publishers growth is anyone who is willing to pay $60 for a game. That includes consoles mind you.
and how does a user manipulating hardware and customizing things do anything but mean I need to test my software under more and more diverse scenarios?
Machuse 1 year ago
@Machuse $60 for games that have their quality at the level of fallout 3 and 4 is just highway robbery. Plain and simple. I get mine 6months or a year after release for way way less and get the same enjoyment. With the added bonus of knowing if the quality is s*it.
esaedvik 1 year ago
@Machuse I am not arguing against console gaming, I am arguing for PC gaming. PC gaming is not be paid attention too. The platform's gaming is not dead, it has grown according to PC Gaming Alliance's research (when they included digital store sales). However if you notice, the PC games that are out there at the moment are primarily console games. You do not get an edge playing it on PC except very minor enhancements. Before, the PC equivalents were alot mightier in term of graphics.
Aryanpars 1 year ago
@Machuse part 2:
When one person starts to manipulate and assemble their hardware, he/she learns about hardware's relation, the software's involvement and overtime, develop a tendency to appreciate complex systems. This appreciation manifest itself in form of greater patience for learning not just about computer hardware but also computing, math and science.
There is a difference between a PC gamer and an Apple user. The PC gamer, is much more informed about their status of their system ...
Aryanpars 1 year ago
@Machuse Part 3:
Making things too simple, is not a bad thing. The problem is, eliminating opportunity for those who want to progress and see the capacity to move from simple to use systems to more complex ones.
Apple just like consoles, provide very simple to use platform in which the machinery is closed to manipulation. Naturally, people move toward "convenience of use" over more complex ones. Therefore expanding the market for easiness. This is evident in faster growth in console games and
Aryanpars 1 year ago
@Machuse part 4:
and apple systems. You may have notice the sudden jump in Macbooks and other apple products. This is a sufficient evidence for the rapid growth of market for simple devices.
The unfortunate side to all this is that, once a publisher sees more profit margin in one segment, it would be logical for it to diverts its resources to the most profiting segment to maximize its profit. In the context of gaming, this entails, less and less development for PC gaming which demands more.
Aryanpars 1 year ago
@Aryanpars Yes, shame on developers for going to where the money is at.
Less effort and more pay? You honestly think most dev teams are going to say no to that?
I know you like to think it's all about the games...but it's not...when EA and Activision is in charge it's all about the income.
You should really consider this issue from a business perspective and you'll completely understand dev teams...or humans in general...it's all money.
ThrillinAllDay 1 year ago
@ThrillinAllDay I presented my analysis what is going on and why PC specific content is vanishing. The most appropriate method of dealing with this is to bring hardware manufacturers such as CPU/GPU/MB/RAM/PSU/CASE/Monitor/Mouse/Keyboard onboard because they are also making money within the domain of PC gaming. Destruction of PC specific content means destruction of their market. Luckily PC Gaming Alliance is taking care of corporate domain.
Aryanpars 1 year ago
@ThrillinAllDay part 2:
However, as part of a solution, we consumers should be more influential and bold. We should be recognized. One way of doing this is to promote PC gaming, discouraging 'Piracy" and etc...
Aryanpars 1 year ago
@Aryanpars You are joking right? Yes, you WERE the foundations. But thanks to piracy and exorbitant development costs, developers target console gaming now. You're telling me that because PC gaming was the basis for the videogame industry 25 years ago, that companies likes Ubisoft and EA should continue developing exclusive PC games even though they will make HUGE losses? They're businesses, not charities.
JonnyPxN 1 year ago
@JonnyPxN but isnt the consoles are pcs?? inside the consoles are motherboards and everything from a pc right? they still need to improve the pcs to improve the consoles right?.. im just asking cuz right now im really blurr...
munirss 1 year ago
@munirss yes they have many components from PC's, but since their man task is gaming, they are different from PC's.
JonnyPxN 1 year ago
@Aryanpars The issue we all need to think about here is, how do we make game developers change their ways?
Something needs to be done.
WelfareSymphony 1 year ago
Gran Turismo 5 today showed how FUCKED UP console hardware is already today. I was amazed how bad the graphics was, to me Looked like last gen game...Developers should stop making there cross platform shit, cause pc can do much more than a console and they tune down graphics so it can be also playable on consoles, WTF ? Pc owners spend 1000 dollars each year for hardware and they don't deserve normal games ? We still have adgy and blocky characters even in recent games. I won't buy this shit.
tutaberi100 1 year ago
@tutaberi100 GT5 isnt cross platform and u sure u didnt see it in SD it looks lush :)
SkylineR33FTW 1 year ago
@SkylineR33FTW Yes, I know it's ps 3 exclusive..I am talking about other games that could look much better if they were not cross platform.. Crysis 2 for example. GT 5 is just an example how outdated consoles are already. Pc games could use all the benefits of dx 11 and powerfull teraflop video processors, but that won't happen, cause in this case consoles won't be able to run these games... GT 5 inviroment and textures look just awful ! It does not metter you watch it in HD or SD.
tutaberi100 1 year ago
@Aryanpars You can thank all the pirates that would torrent games instead of purchasing the game.
alaskanhybrid 1 year ago
Night sky at the ending looks terrible:
1 - Moon texture is bad.
2 - Moon and stars seem to move independently as the camera moves. Both are at "infinity", they should move together to an Earth observer.
3 - The stars are too big and dull. They should sparkle and have different colors.
vittau 1 year ago
@vittau
" They should sparkle and have different colors."
Different colors? No. Yes stars are different colors depending on their temp, but we can't see that when looking up at the night sky.
mecher3k 1 year ago
@mecher3k www_.flickr._com_/photos/fortphoto/3553557451/sizes/l/
Of course we can. It's not a huuuge difference, but you can distinguish a few colors on a decently clear sky. The 3DMark stars just look like white pixels with gaussian blur.
vittau 1 year ago
@vittau the moon could use some work...
Thet3 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sad all the advertising they show in the demo. Money, Money, Money.
possum440 1 year ago
@possum440 The MSI and Antec logo placements are special sponsorship arrangements between those companies and Futuremark. Advertising placements ensure that Futuremark can offer a free Basic Edition of the benchmark alongside the Advanced Edition.
FuturemarkTV 1 year ago 73
@FuturemarkTV
So I don't have to see advertising in the professional version?
julianakaff888 1 year ago
@FuturemarkTV So the full, payed version doesn't include any ads?
bv90andy 1 year ago
@FuturemarkTV aint that just like 3D Mark Vantage, where Sapphire was a sponsor of you?
DJ1992JD 1 year ago
@FuturemarkTV "adv ensures that you'll offer basic edition" what the hell are you talking about, like you don't have enough money to allow us take a look of a trial. stupid everyone is releasing a trial and it's helping for your sells, so stop spit bullshit.
2danimm 1 year ago
@2danimm stfu its a small logo, I think it kinda cool. At least you don't have gay ass commercials like youtube has...
knockdoun 1 year ago 2
@knockdoun wow so if it's small it's fine? you ass
2danimm 1 year ago
@2danimm It doesn't interfere like commercials so... yea it's fine. Besides I like Antec and MSI they are decent brands
knockdoun 1 year ago 2
@possum440 u stupid ? they're making a free edition so people is able to use it.
Styka 1 year ago
@possum440 You want Futuremark to be a charity?
BaileysBeads 1 year ago
@possum440
nice story, but there is not going to be a free version!
Or do you count one free run as a free version?
Stern271080 1 year ago
@Stern271080
there is a free version check the site
ShroomSamich 1 year ago
@possum440 Do you think it's free to make programs like this?
K1ngggg 1 year ago
Comment removed
tipoomaster 1 year ago 3
OWN4G3!!!
VALVeisG0D 1 year ago
Somebody must do something about those freagin consoles. Why on earth do they keep releasing the worthless machines? They only keep game development from going forward.
toutagamon 1 year ago 5
@toutagamon
They certainly are holding PC graphics back. GPU and CPU power has risen massively since the PS3 and 360 were released, and yet most PC games still look like they were made in the years those two were released in. This is because most developers make the game for one of the consoles, then hastily port it over to PC.
tipoomaster 1 year ago 92
@tipoomaster Because if you put all your effort into the top end graphics...the people who don't buy the newest stuff the day it comes out will not buy your game due to the fact they cannot play it.
By releasing a game that can easily scale (which usually means leaving out the newest features of direct X and all that jazz) you successfully increase your available consumer and thus sales.
And honestly, who gives a fuck about top end graphics....GAMEPLAY > GRAPHICS.
ThrillinAllDay 1 year ago
@tipoomaster A good example for it. Black ops doesn't look better than cod4. That's like BFBC2 in perf with horrible graphics too... Crysis is still a very awesome game for graphic? 4 years after the release. 90% of games look crappy. Some games like metro 2033 are truely made for PC. it's 1000% better on PC with physx and maxed graphic. Crysis 2 would be on console and pc. Nvidia paid them to include physx. That save us from another console to pc game with shitty graphics. THATNKS NVIDIA.
billy5110 1 year ago 4
Comment removed
Thet3 1 year ago
@tipoomaster agree. and the games could be 5x nicer with 10x more outdoor view range and still 5x faster but they are not. Eben I have plenty technology idea doing that. But they holding all back on purpose. Not just the card makers, the engine developers too...
damagepy 1 year ago
@tipoomaster Actually, most games have a several year development cycle so by the time they hit the shelf the current CPU and GPU technology has far exceeded what was available at the time they began development.
You also have to consider that the developers have to code for a mid-range machine since most PC sales are at the low to mid-range of the hardware spectrum. Typically only gamers will buy hardware that can handle something of this caliber.
Zuato 1 year ago
@Zuato
Both valid points, but ideally a game engine would scale well across all ranges of hardware. Much harder to code for, I know, but nevertheless I feel that most developers just set consoles as their bar and as such PC hardware never achieves its potential. Its been 4-5 years after this generations consoles launched, and memory, GPU, and CPU potential has exploded since then. And yet, improvements in game graphics haven't come close to matching that increase in potential.
tipoomaster 1 year ago 21
@tipoomaster Well fckit. We will have to wait for PS4 :(
D3w10n 10 months ago
@tipoomaster I really don't count console limitations as optimization because even then games can still run like shit on PCs ahead of consoles Ex: GTA IV and From Dust.
I don't see what's hard about coding a game to make full use of your hardware. Ex: Hard Reset (PC Exclusive) makes about 98% use of your GPU while a game like From Dust (console port) would only make use of 30% of your GPU, the performance differences are significant.
Daxter609 5 months ago
Games should have moore destructible objects and flowers should move when i walk over them - you know what i mean :) Such like Crysis had. Moore interaction - EVEN IN COST OF IMMERSE -=STATIC=- LANDSCAPE.. like in Arcania etc..
Vxitha 1 year ago
/jizz
boredgunner 1 year ago
People keep thinking this isnt real , or is CG... This is being ran on a computer guys, at a rather smooth 30+FPS ! ( as it looks)
But i do wonder what hardware its running on , and drivers too... hmmm.
TylerTron21 1 year ago
omg this benchmark is going to be a killer! my comp is lagging just playing a recording!
bubinasuit 1 year ago
Looking alot better than the release. Now with dynamic foliage! but seriously, it does look alot better than before. The deep sea one looks interesting
poodlemeister22314 1 year ago
looks good, now everyone go buy their awesome game Shattered Horizons which is even cooler than this video. DO IT NOW! MORBO COMMANDS IT!!!
BigSilverHotdog 1 year ago 3
The lighting in the jungle scene is too color saturated. It has an exagerated blue tint and it gives the scene a slight cartoonish look. Also, in the underwater scene the rusted submarine being lit doesn't cast shadows. The lights from the other two submarines cast godrays, but no shadows. Watch carefully 0.51 - 0.53
sublim28 1 year ago
Wow, almost a movie grade soundtrack!
Mt7juans 1 year ago
considering consoles have early directx 9, they're far from the real PC potential...problem is that alot of developpers tend to poorly adapt games from console to PC and that pisses me off...i'll get an HD6970 soon so bring it on with sweet eye candy!
falmatrix2r 1 year ago 2
this is not 1080p massive pixels LOL
1Striker1 1 year ago
@1Striker1 yeah my 1080p monitor isn't loving this
Flyguyc12 1 year ago
First scene I thought... Crysis finally met its match.
xenol 1 year ago
@xenol Nah, u can easily recreate that in Crysis with the tools released for the game. Check this jungle scene, rendered in realtime: vimeo(dt)com/14480956
soetDjur 1 year ago 3
*SPOILER*
there will be no next generation consoles
nomercy8989 1 year ago 12
I wonder if next generation consoles have direct x 11.
Mamboyin 1 year ago
Comment removed
boredgunner 1 year ago
@Mamboyin Course they will.
StephenSuttieHouse 1 year ago
dammnnn this looks sick!
lorenzo1234567891011 1 year ago
first bit reminded me of lost
utubeb14 1 year ago
that looks so damn realistic xD
xb4b1x 1 year ago
I wish there were adventure games like this :(
Kenjineering 1 year ago
@Kenjineering I want GTA with this graphic :D
Dr3vill 1 year ago
Nice graphics :)
MouthofSaurons 1 year ago 2