9/11 Truth Niels Harrit on Nanothermite Evidence GoodMorning Denmark

[bergssprangare]

The professor  is a thermi pervert

[biggbrattz]

Surprises me no end that a person presenting themselves as an expert can make such reckless statements. There are other SIMPLE expanations for the presence of these compounds. They are often found in fires where steel and aluminium are in close proximity. I am no expert....you don't have to be....this is easily verifiable. This man just ruined his professional reputation, and will likely find himself on the roster of the unemployed, along with Stevne Jones.

[Thetan1974]

@biggbrattz

Of course Harrit is an expert. You're just in denial, because you need to call every respected scientist and expert who finds science that points to an inside job "kooks".

Now, you have two assigments:

1) Prove what can create the same iron rich micro spheres that USGS and RJ Lee sorted out and which thermite so far is the only explaination of

2) Show us what paint or other substance contains these "explosive" iron micro spheres-creating chips

[Krackonis]

What he asks for is what we should all expect. A normal mass murder investigation. If you found 3000 bodies in a field, we would expect an investigation of those murders.

[BYTaipei]

I lke to know who get the answer of the follwoing: 這是一個簡單的問題， This is one simple question, 奈米科技有沒有遭到極權主義組織犯罪團體濫用的風險？ Is there a risk that nanotechnology abused by totalitarion organized crimes? 奈米科技在中華民國境內及境外有沒有公開及積極的防制濫用的措施­？ Is there any open and possitive solutions in works in Taiwan, Republic of China or internatonal society? 為什麼沒有？ Why not? 這是一個簡單的問題。 It is one simple question.

[Yerizzo]

LoL, obviously Daoak28 has no common sense as he puts it. Because common sense will tell you that those building shouldn't fall like that.

[Lietuvispartizan]

9/11 was a false flag attack

[KaptajnKaffe]

I call Bullshit!

I am embarrassed to be a Dane, when people like this gets a primetime in television... -.-

[Algonquien3]

Don't know anything about the background on this but .1mm is not even close to being small enough to qualify as a 'nano-particle'. A true 'nano-engineered' particle is below the micron level.

[PoetryHound]

Squibs? Nonsense. No demolition experts say those were squibs. Not one.

And now thermite reactions suddenly cause explosions? Also nonsense.

The red-grey chips turn out to be not "nanothermite" but the paint and anti-corrosive coating used in the WTC. The chemical analysis by Haritt revealed the exact chemical composition of the paint as stated by the company that manufactured the paint. What a bozo.

[codematrix]

No one, are you kidding me. So far a 100 world wide demolition experts say it was a control demolition, freefall very close to the speed of gravity. What about Building 7? These are the only 3 buildings in the world that have been brought down by fire.

[PoetryHound]

There are zero demolition experts who say the twin towers were brought down in a controlled demolition. I know of just one demo expert who says WTC 7 was a CD, but he wasn't provided with all the information. So no, there aren't 100 demo experts who say it was a CD.

The only 3 buildings in the world brought down by fire? You're off by about a million.

[codematrix]

Buddy, do your research before you make and false assumptions.

Who did it then? Osama? Where's the proof? Show me the beef. All evidence points to an Inside job. WAKE UP!!!!!

[PoetryHound]

I know someone is a kook when I point out their errors and their response is to change the subject. Like you.

You are dead wrong about the 100 demolition experts.

You are dead wrong about only 3 buildings in the world being brought down by fire.

Apparently the only "research" you've done is to look at crappy YouTube videos.

[Daoak28]

Go fuck yourself code matrix, you're an evil douche bag or one of the stupidest people ever existed. The logistics alone it would have taken to "fabricate" such an event proves that it could not have been an inside job. What more you their is more than enough evidence, besides a confession, to show al queda did 9-11.

[codematrix]

Are you fucking stupid dickhead? What other proof does the FBI/CIA have that it was alqada? You''re nothing but a fucking peeon like the rest of you sheeples you dick!

[Daoak28]

Fuck you you fucking coward. Bow to your Islamic masters. Submerse yourself in their lies and deception. Spread those lies yourself. You use these lies as nothing more than to spread your hateful agenda. The life you live is one of cowardess.

[codematrix]

FUCK OFF ASSHOLE. It's you that have been fed fucking lies you dump peeon.

GO FUCK YOURSELF and EAT the SHIT your gov't feeds you. I stand for the truth you coward DICK HEAD!!!

[Daoak28]

It's not the government that feeds me you dumbshit it's fucking common sense, which you obviously lack because you are blinded by an agenda of hate. You're Fucked Shit.

Just remind me who do you think did 9-11? Bush? Jews? Mossad? CIA? which is it now? There are even fuckheads that think aliens blew up the buildings

[CarnivoreEschelon]

@codematrix

sorry to say but when you lack the ablity to look at the full picture and take into the research the fact that the rutproofing in the paint chips were misrepresented by ta group of scientist trying to prove controled demolition.

[mujaku]

@CarnivoreEschelon The composition of red oxide primer paint used to prevent oxidation of steel beams is vastly different than the target compound that was tested. In addition, the primer paint at 800 degrees C remains stable. On the other hand, the target compound the Professor is talking about ignites at 430 degree C. There is a high probability that the target compound the Professor tested in nano-thermite.

[CarnivoreEschelon]

@mujaku problem also he uses an acetlyne torch to do so. Also since not a single one of his samples have an chain of handling or are five years old. they are not the same grade of the USGS study that dis proves all of Jones work.

He specifically ignored all the other contaminates in the pulverized dust. and invalidated his findings.

[8n4n08]

@CarnivoreEschelon So why would 'ignoring' the other contaminants invalidate his findings?, this is simply not the case, The point is that the there was a complex nano-thermite compound present, you can't avoid this. He started with a hypothesis (or not, doesn't really matter), found chips of an unknown material, analysed them and found them to be a highly complex substance, Fact.

The other study you point to had the specific purpose of discrediting his work, and suceeded, how scientific... NOT.

[Daoak28]

adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement would use the reverse scientific method to arrive at their conclusions, as they "determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion

[JO911B]

The curious thing about all the so-called confessions is that whenever they are analysed by someone who isn't a US intelligence agency, they are invariably designated fakes.

[codematrix]

All I ask you is to watch these videos then comment.

watch?v=itB4WY8cFG8

watch?v=0z4ZHc9BRwM

watch?v=Db2te1u8Dgs

Now this is what happens when a building is on fire and it collapse. On 911, the twin towers and B7 collapsed on itself, much like all control demolishings.

watch?v=V5ltpdwnvxk

Now show me any proof that 911 wasn't an inside job. I've searched everywhere and what I found were more answers.

I like you was once a believer that 911 wasn't an inside job.

[PoetryHound]

You have allowed yourself to be misled by a group of charlatans with no relevant expertise and no evidence to back up their accusations. Watch some video? Please... spare me the idiocy of the twoof movement. Twoofers tend to be a cult-like group of people, they offer no evidence, but demand that their version of events is correct... cause they have a video. Studies? Evidence? No of course not, a video... with creepy music... and voice over. Telling them what to think...

[codematrix]

Show me the evidence to prove other wise. Other wise, stop denying what you can't prove.

Yeah, there are some videos with creepyiing music and crap like that, that gives less creedence. I'm with you there.

But what I gave you to watch is none of that. They are all experts in their fields but you like many believe the crap you see on MSM. I feel sorry for you. It's people like you that they pray upon.

[PoetryHound]

I don't feel any obligation to prove anything to you. I merely pointed out where you were wrong.

[martinez85]

PoetryHound has been arguing on 9/11 for years. I recall his posts 6 years ago. Sad. Is this your job or what? When the fellow said the only 3 buildings to collapse from fire... he means steel structures. And building 7 is the only steel structure in history that collapsed from fire alone. No planes. For some reason also many news stations reported that it would collapse before it did. As did the firefighters who pulled out and told people to get back because it was going to come down.

[PoetryHound]

No, WTC 7 is not the only steel structure in history that collapsed from fire alone. The Kader Toy Factory and the McCormick Center were very different building types from WTC 7, but they were indeed steel structures and they did indeed collapse from fire.

The firefighters did indeed fear that the damage would result in collapse. They weren't shy about sharing that expectation with others, and many news stations did indeed report that expectation.

[cycimian]

Problem in America is the same military getting rich off war owns the Media.

[nickstemoeilijk]

Great upload, thanks.