Controlled Demolition - FAIL

[152czar]

gosh damit, I think they should have put in some desks and chairs to make it collapse. maybe jet fuel to get it started.

[spacewardsebas]

9/11 controlled demolition WIN¡¡¡¡

[Ironside451]

Proves it sturdy though!

[SpyroVersusRed]

Om nom nom I is a nomster!

[WarHawk215]

it must be hard to be an idiot

[clark144]

and thats what should have actually happened to the top halfs of the towers had they actually givenway to the structural damage caused by a plane alone

[aaronchungrulez]

like a glove!!!

[oleguersveira]

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[MrIllernhans1]

YATZI!!!!

[rafteam1]

building 1-0 explosives xDDDDD

[tropophyte]

Shouldn't there have been a pancake collapse in there somewhere. There was no fire on the lower 50+ floors of the WTC on 9/11 like this building but somehow the lighter mass upper weakened floors, crushed and pancake collapsed the lower unweakened mass. Do you understand how this building just rolls and remains intact.  If there were no explosives in the wtc it would have been as secure as this inner structure. Only explosives brought those buildings down... NOT AIRPLANES. 9/11 inside job.

[YINGAI1995]

thats quite a strong building!

[Johnalexgray]

investigate 911

[stratocaster539]

wow - the conservation of momentum is really true after all!

[commander672]

I rolled a Six!

This is less a fluke and more proof that civil engineers have a since of humer.

"Hey, you know what would be cool? Let's overbuild this thing and deguise the braces! Really fuck with the demomen!

[danielcahu]

@femr2 didn't know that cements burn now..

[unillenium]

too much rebar in teh concrete!

[murdaville100]

at 0.3 i see clevland in his bathtub no, no, no, no, noooooo

[3lectroPhunk]

happened in Germany

[pokeranger123]

DO A BARREL ROLL

[Paiste402]

LOL they cut it down like a tree!

[BradfordJL]

Should have hired Dick Cheney! He's the proven best!

[AnarexicSumo]

well, they succeded in making a massive cube roll

[proudfootz]

Well, at last we have proof the assymmetrical damage should have caused collapses more like a tree falling than explosions.

[ujisx]

Here is another one I just found.

watch?v=moc0KK4zYDk

[flanksteak2]

There you have it. Since the WTC's were made out of concrete and since this building is of the exact height and dimensions of the 3 steel skyscrapers, we have now have total proof that all WTC's should have tumbled ass over tit through Manhatten and out to Sea.

911, definitely an upside down job!

[loccysmif]

flanksteak2:

No. This video teaches you something else. Namely:

Asymmetric damage causes escalating asymmetric failures, causing asymmetric collapse, towards the path of least resistance.

It's been this way before 9/11, and it's been this way since.

But not ON 9/11, for three crazy successive building destructions.

By the way, the WTC had concrete in its core. Look it up.

[flanksteak2]

Your words "assymetric" damage and such are totally irrelevant to the situation.

If you actually knew what you were talking about then you wouldn't even bother using such terms in the context you are using them.

And to be more specific, you are kept stupid because you choose to stay stupid, not because anyone is oppressing you.

[loccysmif]

flanksteak2: how so? (By the way, you spell asymmetric incorrectly, you apparently put the "ass" back in)

[proudfootz]

Thanks for posting this!

The more data points available, the better we'll understand gravity-driven global collpase!

[willylm]

AROUND THE NET!

[schizbouncer]

AOTS!!! awesome fail.....

[killerkitty777]

ROFLMAO

[glaxko]

so is the building

[rifleman0007]

like a lego block

[RuffleTheTeacher]

This footage was obviously faked!!

Everyone knows that a building with a gap like that in the side would fall straight down and collapse the floors below, as well as the intact floors above the damage! It's called the "Pancake Theory", duh!

I think SimonShack shold have a look at this and see if he can find the clues left behind... like the rolling down the hill?!? Buildings made of concrete and steel don't roll, they turn to fine dust!

[killerkitty777]

Thats illogical.

Jenga blocks dont collapse down when you make an space 2/3 across, they topple OVER

Buildings pancake in proper controlled demolitions...like the twin towers. For each 'specialist' that supports what you said, there are 5 who would  not.

you have been reading too much '9/11 evidence' from the Report, which , I might ad, governments all over the world are doubting and is sketchy and misleading at BEST.

its logic that it would tip since they goofed the demo up

[marksman500]

Killerkitty.."Buildings pancake in proper controlled demolitions.".. -- Wrong! Explosives are placed to collapse at the base first and work their way up. At the WTC, the collapse occurred at the exact point of impact and collapsed down...Not even close. Killerkitty.."governments all over the world are doubting and is sketchy and misleading at BEST".. --- Like who? Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the pres of Iran? Or maybe Hugo CHAVEZ President of Venezuela? Get your facts straight!

[killerkitty777]

dumbass, Japan sat around for weeks pouring over this stuff, you can watch them discuss it on Youtube. These are arguably some of the most intelligent ppl on earth and they were not impressed with the 'findings' of the report

Finding a 'passport' from a 'terrorist' in all that rubble is bullshit.

get a clue

no f-ing way...you watch too may hollywood movies, this shit is less than improbable.

those buildings collapsing down like that, all too perfectly is evidence in itself.

[marksman500]

killerkitty..."Japan sat around for weeks pouring over this stuff,"..

---

And?...So they say it was an inside job?...Nope!

One guy, Yukihisa Fujita, who is a Member of Parliament brought up 911.

Japans Prime Minister Fukuda:

.....According to secret information obtained by our government and reports put together by foreign governments the 911 attacks were carried out by the international terrorist organization known as Al Qaeda.

Now post where they say it was an inside job!

[JSSTyger]

Japans Prime Minister Fukuda:

.....According to secret information obtained by our government and reports put together by foreign governments the 911 attacks were carried out by the international terrorist organization known as Al Qaeda.

Dude...thats just a "please be my friend" statement. "I don't want to hurt my political career"

[marksman500]

JSS.."Dude..thats just a "please be my friend" statement. "I don't want to hurt my political career"..

--

Lol....No. It's the fact that the Italian intelligence, German intelligence, Britain's MI-6 intelligence, Israel's Mossad, Pakistan intelligence, Indian intelligence, French intelligence, Russian intelligence, Egypt, Dubai, France, Canada, shared "general" information with the U.S. of possible attacks prior to 911 based on bugs in apartments & through surveillance of Khalid al-Fawwaz .

[JSSTyger]

"Lol....No. It's the fact that the Italian intelligence, German intelligence, Britain's MI-6 intelligence, Israel's Mossad, Pakistan intelligence, Indian intel..."

Lets make sure to shake everyone's hands, nod our heads, smile, and make a good impression. Sharing alittle intel means nil.

Look in the news...Russian subs spying on us...I'm sure the Russians are just laughing it off and spilling the beans. Everybody has their dark little secrets.

[marksman500]

JSS..." Sharing alittle intel means nil."...

-----

So youre saying ALL of those intelligence agencies that were aware something was being planned and warned the U.S. of a possible pending attack, really dont believe Al Qaeda Planned and executed 911?

I can connect the dots showing Al Qaeda Planned and Executed 911?

Can you connect the dots showing Bush Planned and executed 911?

[loccysmif]

Marksman500, you should know that intelligence and operations are two different things. Usually due to compartmentalization, the intelligence branch knows nothing about what the operations branch is doing.

In fact, often multiple groups under the directorate of plans are working on the same thing, but they are not informed of each other's activities.

Al Qaeda was obviously involved. At least, that is my opinion. Look up Ali Mohamed for understanding. Where is he now? And why?

[marksman500]

loccysmif..."Usually due to compartmentalization, the intelligence branch knows nothing about what the operations branch is doing."....

----

As was the FBI & CIA prior to 911.

[loccysmif]

marksman500, no, I was talking about the CIA, not the FBI.

You are saying atttempting to warn and being complicit are mutually exclusive. This is not true. There were factions in the FBI and the CIA trying to do their job, and there were factions trying to stop them. There were those who knew what was coming, and those who didn't and tried to stop it.

Guess which of these two competing factions won.

[flanksteak2]

The Japanese are the smartest people in the world?

[killerkitty777]

some of I said. walk up to a 14 year old Japanese/Chinese kid and ask them to do some wicked math problem. They will do it in their head or the long way on paper...its unreal, our university level math is something they learn in High school, Arabs too. They are so much smarter than us its embarrasing.

we are kept stupid on purpose...teach the opressed, they are under a thumb anyway right?

but keep the free stupid so they dont know enough to complain.

[flanksteak2]

Are you saying that Arab and Chinese children have more freedom than you do?

[loccysmif]

Are you saying that as long as Arab and Chinese children have less freedom than ours, we're fine?

Your government has utterly demolished your own constitution. There is no freedom left to defend, only interests.

[killerkitty777]

you can put it that way lol, but really i mean we are given calculators and taught kiddy math into College.

these kids are made to work their brains, they have to do longt division and anyone who knows anything about child development will tell you how excellent that is.

in the West, we all prefer the easy way out.

we dont learn how gov'ts REALLY work we are given the bubblegum version - to keep us dumb / complacent. if we knew we would realize democracy is BS instead of spreading it

[loccysmif]

Sure, killerkitty777, I agree that the problem is the educational system.

[killerkitty777]

I didnt say that actually. I said they are taught in a better fashion: no calculators, complex math at a much much earlier age....Canada and USA have a very lame education system for a 1st world country.

You have to experience different cultures and hear their experiences to understand it (esp if you have a bias )

its not about freedom so much as theri situation...we are lazy complacent slobs here, they, on the other hand don't have it so easy.

you dont know what you dont know i like to say

[killerkitty777]

nonsense

[shanehoustein]

hahaha!

[priapus512]

Well now if only it had isolated office fires across several floors it would have fallen down nice and straight.

[killerkitty777]

ha ha ha ..good one XD

[yyy2012yyy]

Even though this didnt fall 1400 feet it still rolled from a height of 80-90 feet? and completly rolls upside down without falling apart? and it looks to be made of more wood and stucko then steal and yet it stays together without crumbling apart? It's funny but my point is 9.11 had to have been imploded. I mean get real.

[JSSTyger]

Just remember...it will only "explode and turn to dust" if there is also a small hole punched into the backside of it...

[smitty121981]

great find, thanks for sharing

[prayfortruejustice]

That won't work. That only happened once in the history of the planet on 3 buildings in a single day and will never happen again. IT was a freak of architecture and engineering don't you know. The experts at NIST have wished it so.

[johnnyeveryteen3000]

you could still live in that building but everything would be upside down.

[killerkitty777]

ha ha ha!

[darkside3704]

@johnnyeveryteen3000 LOL... upside down dont turn on the lights the fans would hurt!

[CastingStonez]

holy cow... rollie pollie ollie is right...

that thing stayed intact even through the roll...

5*****

[JSSTyger]

I wonder if column 79 on floor 13 did this....hmmm

[Steeper33]

Nanaothermite

Instsitute of

Scumbags and

Traitors

Great find femr2

[TankSombrero]

Makes NIST and every Utube debunker look like the lying scum they are..

[ujisx]

Maybe is ok without sound. More examples would be nice. You find any let me know.

[femr2]

watch?v=xD126r9ihaw

[JSSTyger]

After flipping through some Bazant publications I find that this would be most accurately classified as "crush down crush sideways". This occurs in most natural collapses with the exception of the ones that fall straight down in on themselves. Those odd ball ones must be classified as "crush down crush up" because, obviously, they fall straight down.

[ujisx]

That is a good one. If you find anymore like that let me know. I will add that to my 911 playlist.

It would be nice if it had sound.

The only other one I have like that is this one.

watch?v=6Y9EGC60GDw

[femr2]

It was in a news broadcast. No real useful audio, so left it out.

[Airportchris2]

Oops, amazing the WTC had less damage than this, and they had a complete straight down collapse, at near if not free fall speed.

[femr2]

It's great isn't it :o)

Roll-on !

LOL

"once initiated, total global collapse is inevitable" ~NIST~

HA HA.

[Airportchris2]

lol, yea, and I am the president, NIST need's help.

[xxcurnuxx]

@Airportchris2 No demolition ever achieves terminal velocity, ever. (free fall really isn't the right word.) This building was made out of reinforced concrete, the World Trade Center had absolutely no steel reinforced concrete. Also, neither tower fell straight down, just about any angle of the complete south tower collapse will prove you wrong, it just happened that most of the north tower shots happen to be from the north, and the tower leaned south as it collapsed.

[CJCA915]

@xxcurnuxx Actually, the 2nd tower, the impact we all caught more video of than anything, to collapse, the section above the impact began to topple, then it came straight down through the building... it should have continued toppling over, of the side of the building, but it smashed straight down through the building, as if the rest of the buildings supports just gave away... the WTC were built for this kind of situation in mind, the steel columns were thicker as you went down to the ground...

[xxcurnuxx]

@CJCA915 As it fell, the top section's lean caused a wedge effect along the base of the falling top section, that in turn causes the complete failure of the support trusses, with no lateral support, the outer and core columns were pushed outward by the shape of the wedge. The broken support trusses added to the wedge's mass and shape.

[CJCA915]

@xxcurnuxx Maybe so, I'd have to see a scientific study explaining what you just told me, but you still have to explain how they began to collapse in the first place, because, the WTC were designed to take the multiple impacts of a 707, which is comparable in size to a 767-200... since jet fuel fires won't cause enough heat to make steel give away, jet fuel is nothing more than kerosene... and we have kerosene heaters, that are made of steal, and can run all day without problems.

[CJCA915]

Also, my dad is an aircraft mechanic for several decades now, prior to that he worked for Boeing, and he don't believe the Pentagon story until he see's it on video, clearly, not this half ass video they've released so far, that shows little to nothing, to prove it's was Boeing 757-200... granted, a 757 flying at cruise speed at sea level is far fetched to begin with, as the airframe isn't designed for that speed at sea level, hence why their cruising altitude is 35,000 feet...

[xxcurnuxx]

@CJCA915 The collapse started when the fires caused too many of the perimeter and core columns to fail do to over flexing, the support trusses sagged in the fires, pulling the perimeter and core columns out with it, when the flexing was to great the core and perimeter columns were pulled free and the top section was liberated from the rest of the building below.

[CJCA915]

@xxcurnuxx Ah, your comment has NIST written all over it... I've read about buildings who had inferno's and burned for 24 hours solid, the steel structure still held.

[xxcurnuxx]

@CJCA915 Also, the 707 has only 83% of the wingspan of a 767, and only has 63% of the fuel capacity. This 26 foot wingspan difference would cause fewer floors to be impacted, and a smaller amount of fuel spread over the same area, also they were designed to take a 707 flying at landing speed (200 mph or something like that) and the plane being low on fuel, not fully loaded ones traveling at 480+ mph.

[CJCA915]

@xxcurnuxx The 767-200, the smallest type of 767 and what Flight 175 was, has a wingspan of 156 ft 1 in, the 707-020 also the smallest of the 707's has a wingspan of 130 ft 10 in, that's a minuscule difference, in reality.

The 767-200 can hold 16,700 US gal, the 720 can hold 16,060 US gal... so there's not much difference there either...

Yea, and the planes traveling at near cruise speed at near sea level is another amazing feat, as the stress would have ripped the wings from the fuselage...

[xxcurnuxx]

@CJCA915 The 767-200ER has a fuel capacity of 23980 gallons, where did you get that fact from? Those specks are straight off the Boeing website. Can you show me were you got the facts for the wings ripped from the fuselage?

[CJCA915]

@xxcurnuxx Ummm, there are 2 different variants of the 767-200, one is an ER, which means extended range... UAL Flight 175 was not an ER variant of the 767-200, it was a 767-222... so therefor the regular -200 has a fuel capacity of 16,700 US gal. However, the first impact, of AA Flight 11, that was a 767-200ER.

Ummm, you can look into EgyptAir Flight 990, a 767-300ER, where they were exceeding the speed for lower altitudes, which sheared off the left engine, and other parts of the left wing.

[xxcurnuxx]

@CJCA915 Still you got the fuel load of a 767-222 wrong again, I've still read on just about every website (including Truth sites) that both had a fuel capacity of 24,000 gallons. Also was it shown that the parts were faulty, damaged, and/or weakened?

[CJCA915]

Flight 175 was a regular 767-200, Flight 11 was a 767-200ER...

[CJCA915]

@xxcurnuxx That removes the 2nd tower, what about the first tower to be hit, the section came straight down through the building...

Also, explain building 7, not hit a plane, no structural damage like the WTC... yet it collapsed straight into it's foot print, from the ground floor, at free fall speed, it's been measured and proven by many.

[xxcurnuxx]

@Airportchris2 Making it look like it was straight down, but a few angles capture to lean of the tower.

[CJCA915]

@xxcurnuxx The top of the 2nd tower to get hit started to tilt, and it should have continued toppling over, but it went vertical, and came down through the building in the path of most resistance.

The first tower to get hit, the impact was much higher, and yet the smaller section came straight down, through the path of most resistance, picking up speed as it came down...

So, explain how smaller sections completely demolished the larger and otherwise intact parts of the building?

[Airportchris2]

@xxcurnuxx It was more or less straight down, given its damage, it should have toppled over off the tower... since the damage was asymmetrical...