Most center-column bibles for Matthew 24:28 & Luke 17:37 for where the taken are refer you for better understanding to Job 39:30 Her young ones also suck up blood: and where the slain are, their is she. So that means they are taken to their death and their corpse's are eaten by vultures. Peace2All
There are quite a bit of things that seem amiss here........and not enough space to address in this comment box. Just think spiritual vs physical. OT was physical representation of spiritual to come.........those that are still reading the bible and waiting for the physical will prob end up like the Jews in Jesus days that had no clue what Jesus meant when he said "I will destroy this temple and rebuild it in 3 days" The new Israel as mentioned in Hebrews is a spiritual Israel.
One MAJOR ERROR amongst many christians is this, the idea that Jesus Chrsit is going to "Rapture the church. He is going to gather his elect, his chossen ones. The Gospel of LUKE tells us this... [34] I tell you, on that night two people will be in one bed; one will be taken and the other left. [35] Two women will be grinding grain together; one will be taken and the other left."
The problem this can´t be a perfect interpretation of the scripture expecially if the there is no holiness in the interpreter. Academic interpretation alone is far from enough! God chosen are no more only jews at all cost but both jews and jentiles who have turned around to be his servants, in other words; the saints!
@JUNIOR4YOU The problem is YOU, mot the teaching as it is VERY GOOD and follows the Bible perfectly, especially in the GREEK. You've been led down a very bad teaching path & you do not know how to do your own research in the Greek words used, which help very much to understand the Rapture event. (catching away) or Harpozo which is the root word for Harpooned which is a catching away from water by a spike & rope stuck in You. Rapture is only the english word for this event. This man teaches GOOD
Since you think that the rapture is a biblical teaching, then you have to look futher than skimming over the bible.
Dispensationalism and bible theology go hand in hand, but looking through history , people adapt to certain teaching and adjust them into a teaching that the bible doesn't support. Look at the teachings of John nelson Darby..
But hey, those who are bible illiterate rather take the preacher word for it.
Enjoy this while you can. it will be gone soon, Christianity !!
@victoriabenn Back in those days some people slept in tents & other small structures. And they did not have heat like you do. Many families were forced to sleep close together for warms & lack of room. This was common in families and was not looked upon as "weird". There was no Sodomites running around in the OPEN then, it existed but only behind closed doors because if caught, they were STONED 2 DEATH as it is a GREAT SIN. This seems strange to us now as we do not have their problems of cold
Mattew 24:38-42 these scripture refer to what mankind will be doing during the last days NOT A RAPTURE.. Jesus say's that two shall be in the field, one shall be taken the other left. same as the women..
During the post flood tribulation, men and women were enjoying there daily life, Jesus refered to this account because many wouldn't listen to the warning , it is given at 24:44 so we need to be ready, not for a RATURE, But for the Great Tribulation.
@bert19742007 There is WAY too much support for a pretrib rapture to ignore. You need to study scripture like this pastor has and see there are 2 different events!
Show me, prove to me the rapture is in the bible and i'll listen to you, but one thing, show me where the word rapture is and i'll listen. How about John Nelson darby.
@bert19742007 How about the "TRINITY" do you believe GOD is 3 Persons in the one GOD? The word TRINITY is not in the Bible. BUT the BIBLE teaches that GOD is a TRINITY. The word BIBLE is not in the Bible but you use it. Your very limited in how you think which is the reason your so ignorant. I know there must be a reason your that way, RIGHT? You have allot to learn if your ever going to understand the BIBLE CORRECTLY. GET the BIBLE on AUDIO & listen to it all the way thru several times soon
@bert19742007 KL What about John Nelson Darby?, He did not start any new beliefs. Your type always bring him up but all Darby did was see in the Bible what every1 else ignored because of the past 1400 years the Catholic church told every1 what to believe. Even protestant did not change quickly. Later more of them saw it & believed. There R a # off early Church Fathers who wrote about it, 1of the earliest was in 373ad by EPHRIAM the SYRIAN. He said it very clearly. U've been led by lies so long.
@bert19742007 You've been told & taught that Pre-Trib believers just want to escape. That is not True, I 've never met 1 that felt that way. We all believe the promises that Jesus made & also said thru Paul that we are not appointed to Wrath. Every believer in the OT that was Faithful & believed what GOD SAID, GOD removed from any Outpourings of HIS WRATH each time.GOD does not change. GOD made it no secret that the Church will be "Caught UP" long before U believe. It's a Promise & GOD lies not
@bert19742007 I'm not going to give you any scriptures to read as you've already made up your mind what they mean, to U. But if your sincere & honest, obtain this book & study it until U understand what it really says without brain washing double talk. ISBN 0-310-34151-5/0595.
Also visit Jack Kelley at {gracethrufaith (.) com} it's free mp3 & much written material that will give you all the evidence you need & have never seen with a understanding of the Greek words that prove the PreTrib is real
@bert19742007 So U watched this Vid & still have no interested N looking deeper N2 what He taught?, Boy how blind can you act?. You have no clue of all the bad teaching you've received to feel that way. Before I ever heard of the Rapture as a new believer I used audio to learn the Bible and I figured it out by what I heard from the Bible. Later when I met other Christians who knew of it & they spoke 2 me I understood completely what they were talking about as I saw it long before I heard of it
4:16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
4:17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
The clouds in this verse refers to ppl, not atmospheric clouds, thus the air is a reference to the spirit, no rapture as u know it
@parousia555 Your interpretation does not fit in with the context. R U a new age believer? WHEN THE PLANE SENSE OF SCRIPTURE MAKES COMMON SENSE, SEEK NO OTHER SENSE, THEREFORE, TAKE EVERY WORD AT ITS PRIMARY, ORDINARY, USUAL, LITERAL MEANING UNLESS THE FACTS OF THE IMMEDIATE CONTEXT, STUDIES IN THE LIGHT OF RELATED PASSAGES & AXIOMATIC & FUNDAMENTAL TRUTHS, INDICATE CLEARLY OTHERWISE - - - - Read & learn, don't interpret the Bible in an ignorant manner. There R Rules of how to read GODS WORDS
@MPPFLIPP So now some present day protocol supercedes the original meaning in the Greek.;also one cud just as easily look in the Greek Lexicon found at the back of either a Strongs or Youngs concordance who scholarship of Brown, Driver and Briggs will bare out that the "dead in Christ" are those who r backslidden, and again in "The Theological Dictionary of the NT" Franz Gittle (1939) will show that clouds is Helenistic ref to ppl....ur oldest Greek NT "Codex SInaiticus" 350 a.d., Plato 330 a.d.
@parousia555 When I look up words I use the 'BDAG" Greek/English Lexicon of the NT. It is the worlds Foremost Respected Lexicon on Greek Word Meanings (ISBN -13-978-0-226-03933-6) I also have what you mentioned. When I translate a word I use the Primary 1st & not the Alternate meanings, unless the context shows otherwise. I should think You'd like the Truth & not just what fits your predetermined beliefs. It's easy 2C what type of person you are by these Fruits of yours N Ur understandings
@MPPFLIPP U know be what fruits, even that u have screwed up, fruits r manifestations of power, not etiquette or academic prowess, the latter of which wud be a slur out of character for one proporting scholarly status, this ad hominen underscores ur intent....and I for one made no derogatory remarks in ur direction, ur BDAG references 'pater' as if it were a deity tense, when in fact it is no different than the Hebrew "av" which many transliterate to 'abba'
@parousia555 For your information, the 'Sinaiticus" was a Gnostic translation of the then known manuscripts & is not TRUSTWORTHY to accept as what the Original manuscripts said. There are over 6000+ other manuscripts that disagree with the Sinaiticus. I would not use the Sinaiticus today any more than I would use a Jehovah Wittiness bible {NWT} to understand GODS TRUTHS. Being "OLD" does not make it better or more reliable. Gnostic 's were a CULT and Not True Christianity. Same for the Catholics
@MPPFLIPP U have the Codex Sinaiticus confused with the Nag Hammadi, which is gnostic.....when did the Greek word to know "gnosis" or an experiential knowing that is in ur bible become a cult....gnostic thought influenced Francis Bacon which became the model of scientific discovery. The originator of gnosis itself is from Socrates, who in turned influenced the Sufi's who had a major impact on early Islam.
Jesus and Christ are both titles or offices, JC becomes a name at Nicea
@parousia555 No I don't have it confused. U assume such. I've studies this subject for over 35 years & am familiar with your belief system. The Sinaiticus follows very closely what we know the gnostic taught. It tries to down play the Divinity of Christ & certain sins in the Bible. Sins that gnostic did not want brought up before them. Like I said, I've studied this for YEARS and if you disagree, I'm sorry Ur so much in the dark about what Real Christianity teaches. Paul warned about the gnos
@MPPFLIPP Paul warned? There is no historical Paul, only the bible mentions him, and this from an original that was 300 years latter....the cannonized text had to be the CS, for the next earliest Greek NT was the Byzantine in 407 a.d.....u r chasing a fairytale
Respond to this video... DSS 260 b.c.e. and no supporting archeology for the Israel makes one wonder how u still believe???? And with no future tense in Hebrew, who prophesied what.....?????
@parousia555 No supporting archeology for Israel??? Maybe you should go to NYC to read the "Dead Sea Scrolls", or maybe go to Jerusalem see the evidences of the archeological findings & digs. You have no TV, Computer, can't read the Newspaper? a Are you a muslim? You sure sound like one, deny, deny, deny. You will stand before the Lord Jesus Christ one of these days. Try telling Him your nonsense. WOE! WOE! WOE!
@parousia555 .......AD - the Year of The Lord - BC - Before Christ.....PRAISE JESUS CHRIST, The King of kings, the Lord of lords, the Messiah of Israel, Savior of the World.
@JesusHoldMyHand1 Since there was no significant person of that time BCE - Before Common Era, and ACE - After Common Era...Nicea and the Catholic church tampering with documents produced the present bible with its fairytale, No fall, No Israel, No Moses, No David, No Enoch, No Elijah, No future tense in Hebrew, thus no prophetic utterance for the future, No virgin birth, No death on the cross, No resurrection, No 1st or 2nd coming, No rapture, No Bible, No Paul or Peter, Tinker Bell loves You
@parousia555 Do I need to repeat it for you. You will find our one SWEET day that here was an Israel, David, Enoch, Virgin Birth, etc and there's going to be an EVERLASTING, ETERNAL Lake of Fire for YOU if you continue your disbelief. It is BC & AD and it WILL one be BELIEVED by ALL. Of course, I'm including all those IN HELL will ALSO Believe..........while they're suffering their JUST punishment........
@JesusHoldMyHand1 The promise of the future, but u have no way to know right here and now what is truth except from ur lying bible.....it takes years of study to see the fallacies of the bible.....maybe u will see the light
Respond to this video... As the lightening shines from the east to the west....this is most curious, does lightning always shine from the east to the west, or is that a ref to the sun, as the Greek Lexicon has as an alternative meaning, and shinning cud either be interpreted as something that happens in a split second or something that takes a day/1000 years???.....fundamental truths sounds like a bias, for can not truth prove itself without a background dependency?
@parousia555 I have no idea what you are getting at? But, I always take what the Original meaning of a word as it's primary meaning. Lightening is Lightening, not "sun" . At the time this was written, the East always had prominence over the West when examples were given. Background is everything when understanding what was meant by the original writer. Present day meanings do not supercede because R understanding may be different on a "word" used then. For instance "GAY" used to mean "HAPPY"
@parousia555 When I was a child, but today 'GAY' means "SODOMITE LIFESTYLE" . When GOD had men write HIS WORDS, HE meant what those words meant at that time & the meaning HE wants is still the same when we must translate & understand what GOD SAID. That 'RULE' of INTERPRETATION I sent is what all literal translators go by when understanding what GOD SAID. If U wrote a letter, wouldn't U want the readers to understand what U meant? & not what they want it to mean? Logic demands this!
Mat 24:42 Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.
I personally believe that Matthew 24:41 and Luke 17:36 are speaking about the Pretribulation Rapture; and not the Judgment of the Nations at the end of the 7-year Tribulation Period.
Pow! Love how Showers nonchalantly reads the rather unemotional sounding Mt 24:40 verse of "one will be taken and one will be left" that so often is misused as a Rapture prooftext then goes on over to the parallel passage in Luke 17:37 where one little detail is added: "...'Where, Lord?' And He said to them, 'Where the body is, THERE ALSO THE VULTURES WILL BE GATHERED." ! Yikes ! doesn't sound like heaven to me! Can't be the Rapture. People need to do scripture-to-scripture study.
The rapture is a very hot topic. What is the truth of the rapture? Is it biblical? Iv'e done an in depth bible study on the subject, reflecting back on the original languages. So please come join me on my channel for a study of the word of God.
this is in accordance with the facts of the first and second going up to Egypt of the sons of Jacob. The first time Simeon was retained. See the meaning of the name Simeon!! The second time it was with Benjamin. See the typing of Benjamin as youngest son of the Father!!
Thank you for this teaching brother!
arek1212 1 month ago
Imagine no bible, wait the bible is a fairytale
parousia555 3 months ago
The only sound teaching here is his lips
parousia555 3 months ago
Most center-column bibles for Matthew 24:28 & Luke 17:37 for where the taken are refer you for better understanding to Job 39:30 Her young ones also suck up blood: and where the slain are, their is she. So that means they are taken to their death and their corpse's are eaten by vultures. Peace2All
JimmyCarol100 4 months ago in playlist More videos from mytreasure777
Great Teaching complete with bible references to back it all up for accuracy----THANK YOU VERY MUCH Dr. Showers!!!
DuneWest 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There are quite a bit of things that seem amiss here........and not enough space to address in this comment box. Just think spiritual vs physical. OT was physical representation of spiritual to come.........those that are still reading the bible and waiting for the physical will prob end up like the Jews in Jesus days that had no clue what Jesus meant when he said "I will destroy this temple and rebuild it in 3 days" The new Israel as mentioned in Hebrews is a spiritual Israel.
acousticdrivers 11 months ago
HARPAZO = Greek = Rapture (To remove quickly - to snatch out)
JesusHoldMyHand1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
One MAJOR ERROR amongst many christians is this, the idea that Jesus Chrsit is going to "Rapture the church. He is going to gather his elect, his chossen ones. The Gospel of LUKE tells us this... [34] I tell you, on that night two people will be in one bed; one will be taken and the other left. [35] Two women will be grinding grain together; one will be taken and the other left."
HedeenJeff 1 year ago
The problem this can´t be a perfect interpretation of the scripture expecially if the there is no holiness in the interpreter. Academic interpretation alone is far from enough! God chosen are no more only jews at all cost but both jews and jentiles who have turned around to be his servants, in other words; the saints!
JUNIOR4YOU 1 year ago
@JUNIOR4YOU The problem is YOU, mot the teaching as it is VERY GOOD and follows the Bible perfectly, especially in the GREEK. You've been led down a very bad teaching path & you do not know how to do your own research in the Greek words used, which help very much to understand the Rapture event. (catching away) or Harpozo which is the root word for Harpooned which is a catching away from water by a spike & rope stuck in You. Rapture is only the english word for this event. This man teaches GOOD
MPPFLIPP 3 months ago in playlist More videos from mytreasure777
Since you think that the rapture is a biblical teaching, then you have to look futher than skimming over the bible.
Dispensationalism and bible theology go hand in hand, but looking through history , people adapt to certain teaching and adjust them into a teaching that the bible doesn't support. Look at the teachings of John nelson Darby..
But hey, those who are bible illiterate rather take the preacher word for it.
Enjoy this while you can. it will be gone soon, Christianity !!
bert19742007 2 years ago
Comment removed
victoriabenn 2 years ago
@victoriabenn Back in those days some people slept in tents & other small structures. And they did not have heat like you do. Many families were forced to sleep close together for warms & lack of room. This was common in families and was not looked upon as "weird". There was no Sodomites running around in the OPEN then, it existed but only behind closed doors because if caught, they were STONED 2 DEATH as it is a GREAT SIN. This seems strange to us now as we do not have their problems of cold
MPPFLIPP 3 months ago in playlist More videos from mytreasure777
@MPPFLIPP Yes I had others chime in and say pretty much the same thing. That makes a lot of sense. Thank you for your comment.
victoriabenn 3 months ago
@MPPFLIPP Your quite wecome, GOD BLESS
MPPFLIPP 3 months ago
Comment removed
victoriabenn 2 years ago
Comment removed
victoriabenn 2 years ago
Mattew 24:38-42 these scripture refer to what mankind will be doing during the last days NOT A RAPTURE.. Jesus say's that two shall be in the field, one shall be taken the other left. same as the women..
During the post flood tribulation, men and women were enjoying there daily life, Jesus refered to this account because many wouldn't listen to the warning , it is given at 24:44 so we need to be ready, not for a RATURE, But for the Great Tribulation.
Rature is not a bible teaching
bert19742007 2 years ago
@bert19742007 There is WAY too much support for a pretrib rapture to ignore. You need to study scripture like this pastor has and see there are 2 different events!
victoriabenn 2 years ago
Show me, prove to me the rapture is in the bible and i'll listen to you, but one thing, show me where the word rapture is and i'll listen. How about John Nelson darby.
bert19742007 2 years ago
@bert19742007 How about the "TRINITY" do you believe GOD is 3 Persons in the one GOD? The word TRINITY is not in the Bible. BUT the BIBLE teaches that GOD is a TRINITY. The word BIBLE is not in the Bible but you use it. Your very limited in how you think which is the reason your so ignorant. I know there must be a reason your that way, RIGHT? You have allot to learn if your ever going to understand the BIBLE CORRECTLY. GET the BIBLE on AUDIO & listen to it all the way thru several times soon
MPPFLIPP 3 months ago in playlist More videos from mytreasure777
@bert19742007 KL What about John Nelson Darby?, He did not start any new beliefs. Your type always bring him up but all Darby did was see in the Bible what every1 else ignored because of the past 1400 years the Catholic church told every1 what to believe. Even protestant did not change quickly. Later more of them saw it & believed. There R a # off early Church Fathers who wrote about it, 1of the earliest was in 373ad by EPHRIAM the SYRIAN. He said it very clearly. U've been led by lies so long.
MPPFLIPP 3 months ago
@bert19742007 You've been told & taught that Pre-Trib believers just want to escape. That is not True, I 've never met 1 that felt that way. We all believe the promises that Jesus made & also said thru Paul that we are not appointed to Wrath. Every believer in the OT that was Faithful & believed what GOD SAID, GOD removed from any Outpourings of HIS WRATH each time.GOD does not change. GOD made it no secret that the Church will be "Caught UP" long before U believe. It's a Promise & GOD lies not
MPPFLIPP 3 months ago
@bert19742007 I'm not going to give you any scriptures to read as you've already made up your mind what they mean, to U. But if your sincere & honest, obtain this book & study it until U understand what it really says without brain washing double talk. ISBN 0-310-34151-5/0595.
Also visit Jack Kelley at {gracethrufaith (.) com} it's free mp3 & much written material that will give you all the evidence you need & have never seen with a understanding of the Greek words that prove the PreTrib is real
MPPFLIPP 3 months ago
@bert19742007 So U watched this Vid & still have no interested N looking deeper N2 what He taught?, Boy how blind can you act?. You have no clue of all the bad teaching you've received to feel that way. Before I ever heard of the Rapture as a new believer I used audio to learn the Bible and I figured it out by what I heard from the Bible. Later when I met other Christians who knew of it & they spoke 2 me I understood completely what they were talking about as I saw it long before I heard of it
MPPFLIPP 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1 Thessalonians 4
4:16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
4:17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
The clouds in this verse refers to ppl, not atmospheric clouds, thus the air is a reference to the spirit, no rapture as u know it
parousia555 2 years ago
@parousia555 Your interpretation does not fit in with the context. R U a new age believer? WHEN THE PLANE SENSE OF SCRIPTURE MAKES COMMON SENSE, SEEK NO OTHER SENSE, THEREFORE, TAKE EVERY WORD AT ITS PRIMARY, ORDINARY, USUAL, LITERAL MEANING UNLESS THE FACTS OF THE IMMEDIATE CONTEXT, STUDIES IN THE LIGHT OF RELATED PASSAGES & AXIOMATIC & FUNDAMENTAL TRUTHS, INDICATE CLEARLY OTHERWISE - - - - Read & learn, don't interpret the Bible in an ignorant manner. There R Rules of how to read GODS WORDS
MPPFLIPP 3 months ago
@MPPFLIPP So now some present day protocol supercedes the original meaning in the Greek.;also one cud just as easily look in the Greek Lexicon found at the back of either a Strongs or Youngs concordance who scholarship of Brown, Driver and Briggs will bare out that the "dead in Christ" are those who r backslidden, and again in "The Theological Dictionary of the NT" Franz Gittle (1939) will show that clouds is Helenistic ref to ppl....ur oldest Greek NT "Codex SInaiticus" 350 a.d., Plato 330 a.d.
parousia555 3 months ago
@parousia555 When I look up words I use the 'BDAG" Greek/English Lexicon of the NT. It is the worlds Foremost Respected Lexicon on Greek Word Meanings (ISBN -13-978-0-226-03933-6) I also have what you mentioned. When I translate a word I use the Primary 1st & not the Alternate meanings, unless the context shows otherwise. I should think You'd like the Truth & not just what fits your predetermined beliefs. It's easy 2C what type of person you are by these Fruits of yours N Ur understandings
MPPFLIPP 3 months ago
@MPPFLIPP U know be what fruits, even that u have screwed up, fruits r manifestations of power, not etiquette or academic prowess, the latter of which wud be a slur out of character for one proporting scholarly status, this ad hominen underscores ur intent....and I for one made no derogatory remarks in ur direction, ur BDAG references 'pater' as if it were a deity tense, when in fact it is no different than the Hebrew "av" which many transliterate to 'abba'
U r to close to ur subject to be obje
parousia555 3 months ago
@parousia555 For your information, the 'Sinaiticus" was a Gnostic translation of the then known manuscripts & is not TRUSTWORTHY to accept as what the Original manuscripts said. There are over 6000+ other manuscripts that disagree with the Sinaiticus. I would not use the Sinaiticus today any more than I would use a Jehovah Wittiness bible {NWT} to understand GODS TRUTHS. Being "OLD" does not make it better or more reliable. Gnostic 's were a CULT and Not True Christianity. Same for the Catholics
MPPFLIPP 3 months ago
@MPPFLIPP U have the Codex Sinaiticus confused with the Nag Hammadi, which is gnostic.....when did the Greek word to know "gnosis" or an experiential knowing that is in ur bible become a cult....gnostic thought influenced Francis Bacon which became the model of scientific discovery. The originator of gnosis itself is from Socrates, who in turned influenced the Sufi's who had a major impact on early Islam.
Jesus and Christ are both titles or offices, JC becomes a name at Nicea
parousia555 3 months ago
@parousia555 No I don't have it confused. U assume such. I've studies this subject for over 35 years & am familiar with your belief system. The Sinaiticus follows very closely what we know the gnostic taught. It tries to down play the Divinity of Christ & certain sins in the Bible. Sins that gnostic did not want brought up before them. Like I said, I've studied this for YEARS and if you disagree, I'm sorry Ur so much in the dark about what Real Christianity teaches. Paul warned about the gnos
MPPFLIPP 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MPPFLIPP Paul warned? There is no historical Paul, only the bible mentions him, and this from an original that was 300 years latter....the cannonized text had to be the CS, for the next earliest Greek NT was the Byzantine in 407 a.d.....u r chasing a fairytale
parousia555 3 months ago
Respond to this video... DSS 260 b.c.e. and no supporting archeology for the Israel makes one wonder how u still believe???? And with no future tense in Hebrew, who prophesied what.....?????
parousia555 3 months ago
@parousia555 No supporting archeology for Israel??? Maybe you should go to NYC to read the "Dead Sea Scrolls", or maybe go to Jerusalem see the evidences of the archeological findings & digs. You have no TV, Computer, can't read the Newspaper? a Are you a muslim? You sure sound like one, deny, deny, deny. You will stand before the Lord Jesus Christ one of these days. Try telling Him your nonsense. WOE! WOE! WOE!
JesusHoldMyHand1 3 months ago
@JesusHoldMyHand1 DSS 260 bce....I rest my case...next?
parousia555 3 months ago
@parousia555 .......AD - the Year of The Lord - BC - Before Christ.....PRAISE JESUS CHRIST, The King of kings, the Lord of lords, the Messiah of Israel, Savior of the World.
JesusHoldMyHand1 3 months ago
@JesusHoldMyHand1 Since there was no significant person of that time BCE - Before Common Era, and ACE - After Common Era...Nicea and the Catholic church tampering with documents produced the present bible with its fairytale, No fall, No Israel, No Moses, No David, No Enoch, No Elijah, No future tense in Hebrew, thus no prophetic utterance for the future, No virgin birth, No death on the cross, No resurrection, No 1st or 2nd coming, No rapture, No Bible, No Paul or Peter, Tinker Bell loves You
parousia555 3 months ago
@parousia555 Do I need to repeat it for you. You will find our one SWEET day that here was an Israel, David, Enoch, Virgin Birth, etc and there's going to be an EVERLASTING, ETERNAL Lake of Fire for YOU if you continue your disbelief. It is BC & AD and it WILL one be BELIEVED by ALL. Of course, I'm including all those IN HELL will ALSO Believe..........while they're suffering their JUST punishment........
JesusHoldMyHand1 3 months ago
@JesusHoldMyHand1 The promise of the future, but u have no way to know right here and now what is truth except from ur lying bible.....it takes years of study to see the fallacies of the bible.....maybe u will see the light
parousia555 3 months ago
@parousia555 You're the one living in darkness. Jesus Christ IS THE LIGHT.
JesusHoldMyHand1 3 months ago
@JesusHoldMyHand1 JC as a title until Nicea, and there after a name.....come again about the light?
parousia555 2 months ago
Respond to this video... As the lightening shines from the east to the west....this is most curious, does lightning always shine from the east to the west, or is that a ref to the sun, as the Greek Lexicon has as an alternative meaning, and shinning cud either be interpreted as something that happens in a split second or something that takes a day/1000 years???.....fundamental truths sounds like a bias, for can not truth prove itself without a background dependency?
parousia555 3 months ago
@parousia555 I have no idea what you are getting at? But, I always take what the Original meaning of a word as it's primary meaning. Lightening is Lightening, not "sun" . At the time this was written, the East always had prominence over the West when examples were given. Background is everything when understanding what was meant by the original writer. Present day meanings do not supercede because R understanding may be different on a "word" used then. For instance "GAY" used to mean "HAPPY"
MPPFLIPP 3 months ago
@parousia555 When I was a child, but today 'GAY' means "SODOMITE LIFESTYLE" . When GOD had men write HIS WORDS, HE meant what those words meant at that time & the meaning HE wants is still the same when we must translate & understand what GOD SAID. That 'RULE' of INTERPRETATION I sent is what all literal translators go by when understanding what GOD SAID. If U wrote a letter, wouldn't U want the readers to understand what U meant? & not what they want it to mean? Logic demands this!
MPPFLIPP 3 months ago
Sometimes a thing can be so unbelievable that the TRUTH escapes...only to be known
-Heracleitus
FOBmuzungu 2 years ago
Sacred scripture is not to be understood according to mans vain interpretation but by the Spirit of holiness alone.
This so-called teacher is not to be trusted.
Beware of those who confess Yahashua as the Messiah but speak what is false.
8Anya8 2 years ago
Wish I had the money to buy the cd's.
camelhawk 2 years ago
Mat 24:42 Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.
I personally believe that Matthew 24:41 and Luke 17:36 are speaking about the Pretribulation Rapture; and not the Judgment of the Nations at the end of the 7-year Tribulation Period.
dunhova 3 years ago
Showers believes in pre trib rapture. Listen carefully from the beginning!
meggy8868 2 years ago
Pow! Love how Showers nonchalantly reads the rather unemotional sounding Mt 24:40 verse of "one will be taken and one will be left" that so often is misused as a Rapture prooftext then goes on over to the parallel passage in Luke 17:37 where one little detail is added: "...'Where, Lord?' And He said to them, 'Where the body is, THERE ALSO THE VULTURES WILL BE GATHERED." ! Yikes ! doesn't sound like heaven to me! Can't be the Rapture. People need to do scripture-to-scripture study.
EncompassedRunner 3 years ago 3
thank you for posting this
I always had beleived that
Mat 24 is talking about
His Glorious return.
But one shall be taken and one
remains puzzled me. Now I am clear.
Glad I found this teaching.
THANKS SOOOOOOOO MUCH. U ARE BLESSED
annahourian 3 years ago
Excellent teaching!
FToniS 3 years ago 3
The rapture is a very hot topic. What is the truth of the rapture? Is it biblical? Iv'e done an in depth bible study on the subject, reflecting back on the original languages. So please come join me on my channel for a study of the word of God.
Timpler10 3 years ago
It's becoming more clear to me now. Very helpfull video. Thanks
Tommycancan 3 years ago 4
Amen to this video!
1wingsolja 3 years ago 6
this is in accordance with the facts of the first and second going up to Egypt of the sons of Jacob. The first time Simeon was retained. See the meaning of the name Simeon!! The second time it was with Benjamin. See the typing of Benjamin as youngest son of the Father!!
kcenhguor 3 years ago