Added: 2 years ago
From: RidleyReport
Views: 15,040
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (189)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • That's amazing! Lots of respect to those officers and I laugh at people who call the police for things that are legal "what is your emergency?" "Yes there are four gentlemen in our restaurant eating, they have guns" but yet when we see our neighbors house getting robbed or similar acts and crimes we turn a blind eye?

  • I am trying to give my channel a makeover. Any suggestions you have would be appreciated. (drericcook)

    Thank you

    drericcook

  • get a life "dooby"

  • Id like to see this type of litter pickup in Norfolk, Nebraska my bro once walked from his car to an apartment complex where he lived with an sks on his back and some democrat called the cops they went nuts looking for a armed gunman lol dumb asses

  • new hampshire. fix ur marijuana laws.

    then id totally move there

  • OMG that must be freakin sweet... if I tried that here the NY state nazis would shoot me in the face!

  • Oh almost forgot. Subscribed

  • Im starting to like NH more and more. (i still got Arizona ,Georgia , and Virginia)

  • It helps with my zombie problem.

  • @Dmac11a666 Switzerland also has some of the tightest gun laws around, with strict regulations on almost every aspect of your gun, how you can carry it, where you can buy what, how many bullets it can hold, etc.

  • @Dmac11a666 The middle east has some of the highest gun ownership worldwide and look at the situation there. Yeah.

  • @LWAEJGK19 Do you realize how stupid you sound denigrating someone for exercising their rights just because they can?

    Use it or lose it!

  • i would have subscribed only for the cheesy intro's

  • Ha

    "Attacked litter... did not fire any rounds at it though."

  • Let's compare the US and the UK shall we?

    Gun laws

    UK-Possibly the strictest on this planet.

    US-By far the most lax on this planet.

    Violent crime rate per 100,000 (2009)

    UK-85

    US-80

    Guns do not cause crime, maybe it means they result in more deaths but you should tackle the CRIME not the MEANS.

  • um no that's a carbine length buffer tube and 16" barrel.. still considered a rifle. pistol AR tubes are about 3" and have barrels usually under 10" and must be registered depending on the state handgun laws 

  • @markjz no i have the same rifle, legally that rifle is still considered a pistol, basicaly any kind of rifle is as long as it doesnt have a stalk

  • @Dmac11a666 Canada gets a lot of the same media, and exactly the same movies. Much of the world gets many of the same movies.

    I blame milk. Milk in the U.S. is from cows who have been given things that most countries don't allow..and everybody drinks it.

  • @newguy33X Um no canada doesnt have the same media.

  • @TheIronicBanana Oh, you're right. I didn't watch Transformers, G.I. Joe, and the very same cartoons in Canada as you did in the U.S. and don't watch your modern shows and movies now. I didn't have squirt, cap, and suction-cup guns while growing up. We don't know what CNN, MSNBC, and Fox mean, and aren't directed to msn's homepage after we log out of hotmail. Sincerely, there is no escaping U.S. news in Canada. There is...(cut of by transmission of generic U.S. news, with much yelling).

  • @newguy33X ... Im from Canada.

  • @TheIronicBanana Oh, I see. I still don't see how you can say we don't get the same media. We have Canadian news and shows IN ADDITION to U.S. ones, but I would say that we've got tons of U.S. tv shows and movies that kids watch in their formative years and many people chose to watch the U.S. news (probably not most, though).

  • @newguy33X I agree.

  • @Dmac11a666 I'm just saying the U.S. is awfully fucking violent.

  • @Dmac11a666 Crime is one thing, but 10,000 violent gun murders per year is worse than shoplifting, fist fighting, etc. The U.S. has a LOT of citizen on citizen gun violence.

  • @newguy33X your a fucking dumb ass! do you think banning guns stops the law abiding citizen from doing crim that he obviously does all the time, shootn up schools and and shit, or does banning weapons stop the criminals who have guns no matter what, and leave the common family defenseless? ask your self that

  • @nodmessenger Oh, a milk-hormone victim. Hello. Can you process that basic greeting? Hello, I'll repeat it. I simply said that the U.S. has way too many violent gun crimes. I don't know the cause. I pretend to. It's very sad. It's not just absolute numbers, it's gun violence crimes per capita...not nutty cops with adrenaline problems, but private citizen on private citizen gun crimes. It's way too many. Also, learn grammatical rules.

  • @newguy33X What does grammatical rules have to do with what i was talking about? Does it really matter that much? No this has nothing to do with cops and i never said anything about "nutty cops" if you were paying attention to what i said. Guns will always be around. Banning guns does not dis-arm everyone in this country, only the law abiding citizen. I live out in the country, if i rely on the police, if some one is breaking and they are armed as well, does it help me that i am dis-armed?

  • I've just loaded ton of lumber on a truck ;-)

  • Picking up garbage while carrying a rifle isn't good for your spine.

  • @suma4m

    Ever shovel snow? Living isn't good for your spine.

  • legal and nothing you can do about it.

  • I've seen advertisements for the AR Pistol before, and always wondered who the heck buys these things... well now i know.

    With no buttstock, and more recoil, you got far less accuracy then a rifle, but its much bigger heavier then a pistol. The AR pistol would make sense to me as a military weapon if it was fully automatic, but as a semi auto, semi ranged weapon i just don't get it.

  • @GhostInTheShell29

    .

    People buy "pistol" variants of rifles to bypass SBR laws.

    .

    Nobody wants a rifle without a stock, but to have a shorter barrel you need the weapon to technically be a "pistol"

    .

    Videos like this show how silly these laws are:

    You can't have a rifle with a 14 inch barrel but you can walk with this because it's technically a pistol.

  • Pistol def:

    a firearm that is held and fired with one hand

    A handgun is a firearm designed to be held and operated by one hand, with the other hand optionally supporting the shooting hand

    A weapon originally designed, made, and intended to fire a projectile (bullet) from one or more barrels when held in one hand, and having (a) a chamber(s) as an integral part(s) of, or permanently aligned with, the bore(s); and (b) a short stock designed to be gripped by one hand and at an angle

  • The intro to your videos is reallllly annoying. Use a normal voice man.

  • lol I have figured out a plan if i wanted to rob a bank all I would do is grab a garbage bag and look like im picking up trash and then Bam get in and out and back to cleaning up trash =) ... No restrictions on firearms unless your mentally insane then you can own a spork and thats it otherwise us semi normal folks should be able to carry whatever tickles our fancy.

  • Comment removed

  • What is the difference. The same can be said about a sword, compared to a handgun. Or for that matter a sword compared to a bow and arrow. I thin automatic rifles are more of an issue right now anyway, considering the Federal Government wants to restrict them. What happens when they go for the hand guns, using the same logic you just used in reference to the rifles? I am coming up to NH next week, and I plan on bringing my AK. Its legal, just like a handgun. The 2nd Amendment is the 2nd.

  • The Federal Government is going to try to impede on our rights now matter what. People will always be scared, until they are acclimated. The same process takes place with a sword, handgun, etc. While continue to engage their fallacies that further quantify our rights? "un-infringement". Un-alienable. The very legislative laws of NH state that no part, no weapon should be infringed upon. So now are we not supposed to use that which we have been desiring all along? We mind as well remain quiet.

  • a get ya but i'm scottish y the kilt ?

  • @DARKUTEC he's expressing his right to bear arms and bare legs :)

  • he is expressing his right to open carry and to bear arms. he isnt expecting to get into a firefight lol. if ya do not practice your rights you will loose them

  • @dbl79 How about you practice the right of not being a dumbass.

  • This RidleyReport man seems so young and handsome .. i don't understand why he is not out getting lots of pussy instead of hanging out with people who have to supplement their manhood with such large weapons??

  • Lots of pussy will kill you faster than anyone open carrying anything.

    Guns are always more reliable than pussy, yet less so at killing young men.

  • reply to ThePresidentialTouch (19 hours ago)

    I wasn't talking about the fastest way to kill yourself..

    I'm sure that the guns being carried by these litter pickers are very reliable.. but to what end??

    It has been statistically proven that pussy is the most dangerous thing in the universe - with the obvious exception of the government..

    Which is why it is an enormous responsibility upon all of us to choose the right pussy and make the world a safer place..

  • can you open carry and pick up trash in london england?

  • Before you buy another firearm or any shootiing accesories - ALL PATRIOTS MUST BUY AND CARRY A VIDEO CAMERA. Any activism must have redundent videographers in case the primary photog is arrested or loses his video.

    Citizens across the USA should copy the "Open Carry Litter Pick Up Event". We need a Natiional Open Carry Event.

  • Thanks for proving that water isn't wet.

  • Aww man I wish i could have seen this guy! Yeah the Nashua PD gets really edgy about guns I've gotten them called on me because of airsoft guns in public.

  • You're speaking nonsense. Water doesn't contribute to rain. Rain isn't wet.

    Guns don't contribute to violent crime. Guns aren't dangerous.

  • Yep. You've convinced me that guns have nothing to do with violent crime and water has nothing to do with rain.

    Now go change your diaper.

  • I'm sorry I've made you piss yourself. Maybe you should wear diapers.

  • If you wet yourself, that's your piss.

    But don't worry, there's no water in rain.

  • Nope, water has nothing to do with rain.

    Nothing.

  • Yes, crime rates have nothing to do with guns.

    In other news, water has nothing to do with rain.

  • You say that UK's crime rate shows that SK's lack of violent crime doesn't matter.

    What a fool you are.

  • At 0:36

    There is nothing hotter than a gun strapped to the hip.

    *Drool

  • pOOlman lo I bet you do that allot sitting in the dark pooling yourself and your buddies, such a wanker living in a dream world. Your country you speak highly of would be in a world of hurt if not for brave Americans standing on the border so you can sit in the dark and poolman.You are a fembot not a male, all you think about is rock and roll dude!you will be the first to go if SHTF so sad bye bye.

  • Think for once in your life.

    By your demented logic, South Korea's government has already sucked its people dry and controls every aspect of their lives.

    Except that it doesn't.

    Once again, try thinking.

  • Or the UK has something neither the US nor SK has that increase its violent crime rate.

    Whatever the case, the US should learn from SK.

  • Idiot, you don't look at the failed examples for improving your system, you look at the successes. You learn from what works.

    If it works in South Korea, then people should take notes from their model and try to replicate it. Violent crime in the UK has no bearing on the lack of violent crime in South Korea.

    Are you just pretending to be dense?

  • Proof it does work: South Korea.

    Thanks. Bye.

  • 1. You proved nothing.

    2. I gave an example of a society with gun control and miminal violent crimes.

    3. I provided evidence that there are miminal violent crimes.

    4. You repeat the same shit without actually presenting a shred of evidence.

  • 1. I said Korea has few violent crimes.

    2. You found something that said rape exists in Korea.

    3. You failed to demonstrate in any way that violent crime is a problem in South Korea.

    4. The discussion ends with you having lied about traveling the world.

  • Show me where I said rape isn't a violent crime.

    You've proven that you have no idea what facts or numbers are.

  • Sucks to be you right now.

  • Street crime does occur in South Korea, although incidents are relatively infrequent by US standards. Most reported crimes involve pickpocketing in tourist areas and crowded markets and are predominately non-violent in nature. Criminal perpetrators are usually deterred by the risk of confrontation and engage principally in crimes by stealth. Burglaries of occupied residences are usually avoided. South Korea is a country with a very strong gun control law, making crimes involving firearms rare.

  • You don't even know what a violent crime is? Holy crap, I'm talking to a five year old child.

  • Do you know what the word "number" means?

    Where are the numbers?

  • Where are those numbers for violent crimes?

  • Where are those violent crimes? All that purse snatching?

    No. Let's see some real numbers.

  • Quote all that other material about violent crime, please. Prove me wrong.

    Purse snatching is not a violent crime, idiot.

  • I was talking about violent crime, and yep, it has very little, as confirmed by your statement.

    Suck on that.

  • What a convenient excuse. Nice duck and cover.

    Take a look at South Korea.

  • Please tell me about your world travels.

  • Get out of your cage, your paranoid fear-ridden life, and learn to live.

  • As I said, if you continue to respond to things I never said, there's no point in responding to you.

  • Hate to tell you, but I've experienced a society with no guns, little violent crime, and no worries.

    There's more to life than red state USA. Travel for once in your life.

  • Then you should think of moving somewhere safe.

    It's not your job to decide what happens to criminals. You're not Batman.

  • Did I say all crime would stop? You continue to respond to things I never said. Talking to you is pointless.

    And it's ABIDING. You ABIDE by the law. Goddamn, open a dictionary for once in your redneck life.

  • Then it's the government's responsibility to clean up crime better.

  • I am an American citizen.

    I never said people who want to commit suicide only use guns. That's not even true.

    There's no such thing as "law biding citizens." Learn English.

  • The military can be armed without the people needing to be.

  • Um, people are people. A criminal isn't born a criminal. A criminal is a citizen who goes and does something illegal. Guns make it that much easier for a citizen to make a bad, and often fatal, decision.

    Also check out the statistics for gun-related suicides. Many of those people wouldn't have gone through with it if the means hadn't been as easy as the pull of a trigger.

  • This is a fair point, however crime is a symptom of an unhealthy society, not the ease of use of guns. Therefore it should be tackled using a veriety of tools for different situations. One tool is the gun, it is used for self defence. It is not alwayse nessisary to kill your enemies with it.

  • p00lman

    That is just plain wrong, and if you look at the facts in other countries post ban you'll quickly see how wrong you are.

    I won't even go in to the freedom thing, except to say that if you believe that, you need waking up. The real world isn't some utopic peace loving planet where there are no threats to your life. It is totally amazing how people who can read and write can be so stupid at times.

  • You've never lived in another country, have you? There are indeed countries with no guns and very little violent crime. There are, of course, worse countries than the US, but I'm not talking about those, because why would the US take the example of a worse country? But no, there are countries that are doing just fine and have gun control laws.

  • The more guns you proliferate in a society, the more gun-related crimes and the more gun-related deaths.

    In a gun-free society, guess what? No gun-related crimes, no gun-related deaths.

    Simple logic. Try it sometime.

    Freedom is not about weapons. Freedom is about not having to live in fear of being killed by one.

  • Whereas we SHOULD be cowering in fear... live much longer.

    The only way to remove guns from society is by some measure of force, therefore you need to give someone a gun... humm... nice logic.

    You should realise that both pro-gun and anti-gun can live in perfect harmony but only one can protect the other.

  • No force is necessarily, only a good education.

  • I'm afraid after much deliberation i find that some people although educated prefer force to reason and that is why both will alwayse be nessisary.

  • Force is "nessisary" because people use force?

    That's a circular argument.

  • Your "water isn't wet" arguement doesn't hold H2O.

    "Guns don't contribute to violent crime. Guns aren't dangerous."

    Inanimate objects cannot contribute to anything, hence being inanimate.

    Guns are inanimate objects.

    Therefore....guns dont make contributions.

    Inanimate objects are, by virtue of being inanimate, not dangerous.

    Guns are inanimate objects.

    Therefore....guns are not dangerous.

    Arrogance combined with ignorance and logical fallacy....

    is dangerous.

  • I've never seen a dryer ocean than is the expanse of your wisdom.

  • ....and you, sir , are a jellyfish, withering on the shores of the sea of thought.

  • So you're the ocean dry of wisdom, and I've made it to the shores of the sea of thought.

    . . .

    Sounds right to me.

  • Jellyfish can't live without water.

    Besides, you haven't seen my wisdom yet, only basic logic and fact.

  • Good thing shores are, you know, in contact with the water.

    You're not good with metaphors - or writing, for that matter - are you?

  • The same water from the ocean dry of wisdom? What a way to live.

    You're not good at attacking people's strengths - in an effort to turn them into weaknesses, in any matter - are you?

  • Attacking people's strengths to turn them into weaknesses . . . I can't tell if you're still grasping at metaphors or trying to be direct, but it doesn't make sense in either context.

    Shall I call an ambulance?

  • The grasping reflex comes naturally to a withering jellyfish, and they don't have eyes, or minds. People do.

    All of this is rather detracting from the initial point of conversation, but since were already well down that road....you're just bent that Kim Dae-jung died.

  • You got it! I'm pointing out the idiocy of American conservatives because a former South Korean president passed away of old age and sickness!

    You really fell out of the genius tree and hit every smart branch on the way down, didn't you?

  • Had to look the name up, didn't you?

    Mr South Korea proponent, what a joke!

    I'm not a conservative, so I'm really glad that idiocy remark wasn't directed to me! It might have really hurt my precious little black bleeding heart !

  • Why would I have to look up the name of the man who's been all over the papers for the last two days?

    Keep churning out those metaphors, chunky.

  • Didn't know jellyfish read newspapers.

    Why? Already found the one that fits, creamy.

  • So how was that earlier theory working out for you?

    How's ad hominem working out for you too? Or did you eventually have a point to make?

  • Seriously, this HAS been fun, but gotta go back to running my buisness and making more money than you.

    So long Screwy, see you in St. Louis!

  • People use force because they are stupid, but they cannot be stupid all the time, sometimes they choose force because it is easier or they are more used to it working. For this the only answer is to push back, or push to hold your ground. Some times you can 'flank them' by using something besides force, but sometimes you don't have that option.

    The rest of this thought is theory, so i wont list it here.

  • Um . . . no one is using violence against gun owners. There's no reason for them to bring out their guns.

  • You purposely chose the word violence, but this distracts from the fact that most of the attacks against gun rights come undemocratically from anonymous officials that stand to lose allot of power should the people become too self sufficient. Recent examples are the DHS report which characterises constitutionalists as terrorists in word! This is nothing more than an attempt to make political decisions for the public without their consultation. Even if you belive in your cause THIS is underhanded

  • You were talking about justifying force before.

    Force means violence.

    You're saying that gun owners need to respond to force with force.

    That's really, painfully stupid.

  • What it is, is realistic. I'd like to see you use something else on todays armed and dangerous.

    You've resulted to insults because your running out of arguments, your not convincing me you have any substance to your beliefs. You just cause conflict where it didnt exist before, point and scream about how you feel threatened and how you wish someone would force us to bend to your will. There are plenty of politicians that would do this, because they think EVERYONE should do as they say.

  • I've resulted to insults?

    Maybe one day you'll result to English.

  • I thought you could put up a proper fight in a debate. Now i see your only concerned with being insulting.

    I'm glad your so stupid otherwise i would have something to worry about. I guess i was right about self defence all along.

    Good bye you disappointment.

  • You're glad my so stupid? What do you want with my so stupid?

  • I must say...

    an Open carry litter pick up???

    That's one of the most smartest ideas ever.

    You want to protest for arms, and want to carry an arm.

    But you don't want to look like a dangerous threat....you pick up trash while doing it.

    Nobody can ever look at them and fear them, because they are picking up litter...LOL

    In the words of the Guinness commercials. "Brilliant...."

  • Hidden from news last week:

    Americas 6th largest financial collapse: Colonial Bank!

    The FDIC is run by Sheila Bair, a Lawyer, and the dean at the Isenberg Institute. Her and her staff of Zio-clowns are not about to arrest the directors, the executive management, the auditors, or the investment oversight board.

    This clueless clown belongs behind the counter of a McDonalds. He is cooking the 'Health Scheme' where doctors, hospitals, and Hispanic immigrants get a $ trillion dollars

  • It's stupid because it's unnecessary. It has nothing to do with picking up trash. It's just a dickwaving exercise, "Look at my massive, metallic phallus."

  • lol Freudian psychology,

    AND WHAT IS SO WRONG WITH A PSUEDO-PHALLUS? You must be a vagina guy... lol

  • Yes, I'm rather attracted to them.

  • there is a better gun than the ar-15. its the hk 416.

  • While the polygonal barrel is nice, that's available on standard AR uppers. The HK has a piston driven gas system rather than the DI, and really the only advantage there is that it's easier to clean, though with uneven heating of the barrel and bolt, headspacing issues, while extremely rare, are more common.

  • I've heard its much more reliable. The first time i shot an m-4 it jammed on me so I'm bias. lol (i've never forgiven it)

  • It is pretty dependent on weapon maintenance. Both will jam if sand or dirt gets in the receiver, but the HK rifle doesn't vent gas into the receiver, so it's less prone to carbon fouling on the bolt. For the price of an HK 416, you can get yourself a high-end premium rifle from any number of makers in the U.S. that's just going to be extremely reliable, and more accurate. My buddies Colt SP1 has never jammed after thousands of cheap rounds without cleaning it.

  • Good Job Doobie!

  • Amen! I just need to carry Bertha (Magnum Shotgun), and Suki no Hikari (Daito Katana), around with me. I bet me and Doobie would get along swimmingly.

  • 1st

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more