Clearly the Illuminati were in control of this flight to discredit computers and pilots so that they could step in with the new creation Windows 3.0 to dominate the world! I read it on the internet so it must be true! ;p
Pilot error. Navigation maps didn't show the correct landscape i.e the forest. Equipment error. Known Airbus error in engine 'lag' below 100ft.. Pilots saw the runway too late so glide slope was all wrong and they were slowing down as they did the flyover. Air France mucked up the altitude. they specified 100ft. which was below the legal height for airshows, it should have been around 500ft.
Also following my last comment, haven't you noticed how everyone that says it was unmanned is American? You just can't except that we build better aircraft, so you backstab us instead by saying our computer systems suck.
Anyone that says this flight was unmanned clearly know NOTHING about commercial aviation or for that matter aviation, period. You CANNOT fly a jetliner without a pilot! If you could airlines would have got rid of them years ago, why waste money on pilots? For God sake stop saying this was unmanned and start using some common sense!
you'r exactly right , I know a lot about aviation , I went to a full motion flight simulator and flew an A340 .... and I did an exelent landing , and I say .. until now .. NO jetliner can fly all by it self , who's gonna taxi ? take off ? set the route ? caculate fuel preformance ? communicate with the tower ? talk to the passenger's ? and so on ... humen is a lot better that any very automated aircraft if that humen was a pilot
@Niiikh23 Thats correct, however it was more than merely the pilot misjudging, it is known that his instruments were not giving him an accurate picture added to the fact his engines were abnormally slow to respond.
@PhantomBadass he also happened to disengage one of the protocols of the fly-by-wire system which moves the throttle to max to force the plane out of the stall attitude. I suggest everyone interested in this incident read up on "Fly By Wire" by William Langewische...Great read, covers this accident, and it lets you in on what really happened here...It is disputed, yes, but truthfully Asseline was playing around with a system he wasn't familiar with, and pushed its envelope further than he should
@benrosemberg "throttle to max to force the plane out of the stall attitude" any pilot will tell you that to VERy first phase of stall recovery is to bring engine power to flight idle, then lower the nose THEN and only then apply full power. The application of full power will only force the nose attitude to increase thus worsening the stall, the nose must first be lowered. And when your at only 50ft lowering the nose isn't really an option, thus stalls at low altitudes very hard to recover from.
For all those poeple who for some reason think that this aircraft was unmanned (when they have NO proof what so ever) please tune into National Geographic channel this monday (8/03/2010) at 21:00 to see the new Air Crash Investigation which is on this crash and you will see the FACTS. I understand some of you may not wnat to watch in complete fear of being proved WRONG. Giggity
Wrong. Google flight 296 or Capt. Michael Asseline and you will see this video and read the FACTS or watch Air Crash Investigation this monday on the National Geographic channel at 21:00 and find out for yourself.
You talk about sanity yet you truly belive that a computer flew a 70 tonne £40,000,000 aeroplane with no one onboard. I think that sound insane to me. As I said you cna just watch Air Crash Investigation for yourself and then see. But I noticed you didn't mention that in your reply....obviously something you wanted to ignore.
@PhantomDog666 Wrong. This aircraft was NOT unmanned it was pilloted by Captain Michael Asseline google his name or the accidnet as a whole and you will quickly find the eveidence and reports it is also availble on the NTSB website in great detail...do your homework before posting.
@PhantomDog666 your "Uncles neighbours sons wifes Dads Brothers Daughter" do you have any idea how ridiculous that sounds, that would equate to your uncles neighbours daughter-in-law's cousin, but why didn't you put that? Lying won't get you anywhere it just causes you to lose all credibillity and prove my original point.
Resorting to name calling...mosy liars do that when backed into a corner...obviously you haven't the intelectual abillity to actually support your argument...so instead like all sore losers you name call and attempt to reiterate your point with another lie. Nevermind.
Ok so you're clearly very childish so I'll take that too mean either you have some sort of mental imparement or your are 11 years old either way I won't be wasting my time further replying to these silly schoolboy comments. If you have something even mildly intelligent to say then say it if not go away or I'll just block you and you can be someone else's problem.
Phantom, I posted a video response that is about the fly-by-wire safety questions about Airbus and it states three were killed when it talks about the crash at end of video. I included quite a few links, that talk about crash and three fatalities, in info section. Time to end this "unmanned" bs.
If you read the description I clearly state that this aircraft was NOT unmanned it was in fact being piloted by captain Michael Asseline and I happen to know the "in's and out's" of this crash and its subsequent investigation very well, but thanks for your post.
NO it wasn't do your research before making a comment its not hard to find the PROOF that this aircraft was manned the details are listed above the captains name was Michael Asseline just google his name and you'll see.
The facts of this crash are : Air France 296. 26 June 1988. Habsheim, France. 136 people on board. 130 passengers. Captain michel asseline Copilot pierre maziere 4 other crew. 3 killed About 50 injured. watch?v=Ea28bUTUfiM google air france 296 for the full story
Same trolls. Same story. No life.
sonex424 5 months ago
Same trolls. Same story. No proof. No life
pietenpol2010 5 months ago
Glad to read the video description, but can you add some periods in there? It was difficult to follow along with what you were trying to say.
mathfreak123 7 months ago
I can't believe there are French people who actually say "ooh la la". I thought that was just something made up by foreigners.
SayaAensland 1 year ago
@SayaAensland Are you for real?
DeathSoljah4Life 9 months ago
Clearly the Illuminati were in control of this flight to discredit computers and pilots so that they could step in with the new creation Windows 3.0 to dominate the world! I read it on the internet so it must be true! ;p
Zapster48 1 year ago
Pilot error. Navigation maps didn't show the correct landscape i.e the forest. Equipment error. Known Airbus error in engine 'lag' below 100ft.. Pilots saw the runway too late so glide slope was all wrong and they were slowing down as they did the flyover. Air France mucked up the altitude. they specified 100ft. which was below the legal height for airshows, it should have been around 500ft.
blackycheckit 1 year ago
Comment removed
bmwnasher 1 year ago
@bmwnasher That's ok :)
PhantomBadass 1 year ago
@bmwnasher many would still say the plane was unmanned
FoxAirfieldMaverick 1 year ago
@bmwnasher Your CAUGHT! Such a sphincter lipped troll! You say it WAS Unmanned on other posts. Your just trash
sonex424 5 months ago
@bmwnasher You are correct!--lol "thanks for the truth"? Would you like me to cut and paste this for all your troll buddies to see?---lmfao
sonex424 5 months ago
@bmwnasher You're caught!!!! Maybe I sould paste this so your troll buddies can see:)
pietenpol2010 5 months ago
@bmwnasher I notice how you don't respond to my comments on this post---lol
pietenpol2010 5 months ago
this plane whas manned with 100 people and 3 died
HansensUniverse 1 year ago
Also following my last comment, haven't you noticed how everyone that says it was unmanned is American? You just can't except that we build better aircraft, so you backstab us instead by saying our computer systems suck.
cheesemaster1000 1 year ago
@cheesemaster1000 This was unmanned crashing i am from France in world.
Please for poor English
razzler34 1 year ago
@razzler34 This aircarft was flown by Captain Micheal Asseline google his name.
PhantomBadass 1 year ago
Anyone that says this flight was unmanned clearly know NOTHING about commercial aviation or for that matter aviation, period. You CANNOT fly a jetliner without a pilot! If you could airlines would have got rid of them years ago, why waste money on pilots? For God sake stop saying this was unmanned and start using some common sense!
cheesemaster1000 1 year ago 8
@cheesemaster1000
you'r exactly right , I know a lot about aviation , I went to a full motion flight simulator and flew an A340 .... and I did an exelent landing , and I say .. until now .. NO jetliner can fly all by it self , who's gonna taxi ? take off ? set the route ? caculate fuel preformance ? communicate with the tower ? talk to the passenger's ? and so on ... humen is a lot better that any very automated aircraft if that humen was a pilot
killmuster 8 months ago
With such an explosion. How can only 3 people die? I dont get it.
hatethetalkmaster 1 year ago
upps.. turn the air condition to maximum.. gonna get hot in there i guess..
kampfhoschi 1 year ago
Am currently watching this on National Geographic, there were over 100 people onboard, pilot was flying low and misjudged, 3 people died...
Niiikh23 1 year ago 2
@Niiikh23 Thats correct, however it was more than merely the pilot misjudging, it is known that his instruments were not giving him an accurate picture added to the fact his engines were abnormally slow to respond.
PhantomBadass 1 year ago
@PhantomBadass he also happened to disengage one of the protocols of the fly-by-wire system which moves the throttle to max to force the plane out of the stall attitude. I suggest everyone interested in this incident read up on "Fly By Wire" by William Langewische...Great read, covers this accident, and it lets you in on what really happened here...It is disputed, yes, but truthfully Asseline was playing around with a system he wasn't familiar with, and pushed its envelope further than he should
benrosemberg 1 year ago
@benrosemberg "throttle to max to force the plane out of the stall attitude" any pilot will tell you that to VERy first phase of stall recovery is to bring engine power to flight idle, then lower the nose THEN and only then apply full power. The application of full power will only force the nose attitude to increase thus worsening the stall, the nose must first be lowered. And when your at only 50ft lowering the nose isn't really an option, thus stalls at low altitudes very hard to recover from.
PhantomBadass 1 year ago
For all those poeple who for some reason think that this aircraft was unmanned (when they have NO proof what so ever) please tune into National Geographic channel this monday (8/03/2010) at 21:00 to see the new Air Crash Investigation which is on this crash and you will see the FACTS. I understand some of you may not wnat to watch in complete fear of being proved WRONG. Giggity
PhantomBadass 2 years ago
I DON'T BELIEVE IT!!!
This plane was empty and flown only by computer.
No deaths and was not Flight 296
VlCTORMELDREW 2 years ago
Wrong. Google flight 296 or Capt. Michael Asseline and you will see this video and read the FACTS or watch Air Crash Investigation this monday on the National Geographic channel at 21:00 and find out for yourself.
PhantomBadass 2 years ago
What in the name of sanity are you talking about?
This was empty,no deaths,and from reading your description i can only say
I DON'T BELIEVE IT!!
VlCTORMELDREW 2 years ago
You talk about sanity yet you truly belive that a computer flew a 70 tonne £40,000,000 aeroplane with no one onboard. I think that sound insane to me. As I said you cna just watch Air Crash Investigation for yourself and then see. But I noticed you didn't mention that in your reply....obviously something you wanted to ignore.
PhantomBadass 2 years ago
@VlCTORMELDREW TRy doing a little common research before making statements:)
sonex424 5 months ago
This plane was actually UNmanned and flown by computer.
PhantomDog666 2 years ago
@PhantomDog666 Wrong. This aircraft was NOT unmanned it was pilloted by Captain Michael Asseline google his name or the accidnet as a whole and you will quickly find the eveidence and reports it is also availble on the NTSB website in great detail...do your homework before posting.
PhantomBadass 2 years ago
@PhantomBadass I done my "Homework"
My Uncles neighbours sons wifes Dads Brothers Daughter was at the crash site and said nobody was on it, i am inclined to believe them than you.
PhantomDog666 2 years ago
@PhantomDog666 your "Uncles neighbours sons wifes Dads Brothers Daughter" do you have any idea how ridiculous that sounds, that would equate to your uncles neighbours daughter-in-law's cousin, but why didn't you put that? Lying won't get you anywhere it just causes you to lose all credibillity and prove my original point.
PhantomBadass 2 years ago
@PhantomBadass well there you have it, i know the truth from this person,and at the end of the day you are still a chick with a dick.
Unmanned
PhantomDog666 2 years ago
Resorting to name calling...mosy liars do that when backed into a corner...obviously you haven't the intelectual abillity to actually support your argument...so instead like all sore losers you name call and attempt to reiterate your point with another lie. Nevermind.
PhantomBadass 2 years ago
Truth hurt you? LOL
PhantomDog666 2 years ago
You've yet to produce a shred of truth or any tangible evidence to support what your saying. So no not really.
PhantomBadass 2 years ago
Hey,what is that on your forehead?
Why,it is the letter "L".
PhantomDog666 2 years ago
Ok so you're clearly very childish so I'll take that too mean either you have some sort of mental imparement or your are 11 years old either way I won't be wasting my time further replying to these silly schoolboy comments. If you have something even mildly intelligent to say then say it if not go away or I'll just block you and you can be someone else's problem.
PhantomBadass 2 years ago
Phantom, I posted a video response that is about the fly-by-wire safety questions about Airbus and it states three were killed when it talks about the crash at end of video. I included quite a few links, that talk about crash and three fatalities, in info section. Time to end this "unmanned" bs.
kd5gua 2 years ago
If you read the description I clearly state that this aircraft was NOT unmanned it was in fact being piloted by captain Michael Asseline and I happen to know the "in's and out's" of this crash and its subsequent investigation very well, but thanks for your post.
PhantomBadass 2 years ago
LMFAO at you kdguargum
mk3stargazer 2 years ago
kdlang this plane was UNmanned and empty.
SG55OVCam 2 years ago
NO it wasn't do your research before making a comment its not hard to find the PROOF that this aircraft was manned the details are listed above the captains name was Michael Asseline just google his name and you'll see.
PhantomBadass 2 years ago
I'm afraid this is not a youtube empoyee clip.
PhantomBadass 2 years ago
Anothe mock YouTube employee clip so they can continue posting bullshit
bayleafdog 2 years ago
fucking BRILLIANT!!!
0DeathsUnmannedA320 2 years ago
MrJazzFender 2 years ago 2