graffiti is art too. its just that with gang wars and things like that, (like tagging their simple logos and not art like in this video) graffiti is depicted as vandalism with reckless attitudes. many people are just too dumb to know the difference.
@dopedenim. obvious questions as many others dealing with social life and in general. but we do not need definitive rules or total agreement. who cares? answers are easier at the extreme: proper places is eg the wall of an abandoned warehouse. not proper place is eg the frontdoor of a private house etc. if you move from the extremes to the middle, there will be a gray area in which people involved will make a juddgement (passers-by, owners etc.)
@punkslashhippy: good point. even architecture is temporary, or it should be... perhaps the point with this is not about conservation, but respect, for everyone (those doing good graffiti work on proper places and those that dont like having their frondoor splashed with a banal tag (a common thing here in milano)
i know many people that'd completely agree with this infact the majority of the graffiti world would and so do i at certain points.
but in my opinion making my piece temporary also makes it a bit more beautiful at the same time. i enjoy it more knowing that it might not be there tomorrow. and when its gone i'll do it again. for me its about the love of doing it its bout expressing, not the fame,
but i 100% support this. i want to get over the misconception of graffiti artist=thick criminal
love how they show two completely different groups of people to prove a point. nicely done~
Biruhi 2 years ago
graffiti is art too. its just that with gang wars and things like that, (like tagging their simple logos and not art like in this video) graffiti is depicted as vandalism with reckless attitudes. many people are just too dumb to know the difference.
adamgener 2 years ago
@dopedenim. obvious questions as many others dealing with social life and in general. but we do not need definitive rules or total agreement. who cares? answers are easier at the extreme: proper places is eg the wall of an abandoned warehouse. not proper place is eg the frontdoor of a private house etc. if you move from the extremes to the middle, there will be a gray area in which people involved will make a juddgement (passers-by, owners etc.)
alter4 3 years ago
@punkslashhippy: good point. even architecture is temporary, or it should be... perhaps the point with this is not about conservation, but respect, for everyone (those doing good graffiti work on proper places and those that dont like having their frondoor splashed with a banal tag (a common thing here in milano)
alter4 3 years ago
who defines it good? what is proper places ? and is it just a banal tag ?
Dopedenim 3 years ago
i know many people that'd completely agree with this infact the majority of the graffiti world would and so do i at certain points.
but in my opinion making my piece temporary also makes it a bit more beautiful at the same time. i enjoy it more knowing that it might not be there tomorrow. and when its gone i'll do it again. for me its about the love of doing it its bout expressing, not the fame,
but i 100% support this. i want to get over the misconception of graffiti artist=thick criminal
punkslashhippy 3 years ago 2
fantastic video! what a great viewpoint I had no idea existed.
anbe73 3 years ago