I don't think Chris understands the binary logic of faith :-) Faith is a principle of power and is needed even with people who have knowledge. Faith does things that knowledge can't. Why do you think God would want us to develop faith unless it was important.
I just watched the whole video series of chris langan, looking to be blown away, and I find myself mad after watching this. First off, he does not even have a college degree, not even an associates, or bachelors, NONE! Secondly to assume you’re the smartest person on the planet is laughable, as there are numerous others who have scored above 200 on IQ tests. Thirdly, he works in a bar; do I need to say more? HE MAY HAVE A HIGH IQ, BUT HE CLEARLY HAS NO COMMON SENSE OR PEOPLE SKILLS, WHAT A WASTE
Actually there is only 1 person who has scored above 200 in an IQ test and it is Kim Ung-Yong, the worlds highest IQ with a score of 210, he graduated university at 7 and was employed by NASA at the age of 8 to be a physicist, then he left NASA at 16 and went home to become an engineer.
I have to confess that I'm going into this video not wanting to like this guy due to the unholy coupling of his alleged intellect and his alleged theism. For someone, that being me, who's not far south of Einstein, I consider my intellect a large contributor to my atheism as every theist I've ever personally known was a moron. Even if they don't lack IQ, their thought possesses have been twisted by the theistic culture they were reared in so they are only capable of circular reasoning.
Some of you people have no idea what you're talking about. Langan is a genius, near-unrivalled in intellect. You should look up and read his paper on the Cognitive-Theoretic model; most of you wouldn't even understand what he's talking about, let alone the underlying principles of the theory. Sadly he isn't the most intelligent man in the world. There is a guy from Korea who was a guest Professor at Harvard at the age of 8.
Having a high IQ doesn't mean that he wants to fulfill the world's expectations for him. Perhaps he is happy with a simple life and not a lot of expectations. What is wrong with that?
"I could have wrapped the whole thing up in a few years" Then why didn't you? If you really had an IQ of 200+ you would realize that doing your schoolwork and graduating early and going straight to college is far more logical of a choice than getting into fights and not doing anything. Also, way down in the toilet? So sorry Charles Darwin doesn't live up to your bully expectations. He needs to get over himself. IQ is not a measure of capabilities, as we see here.
@prrsh612 I was told I was dumb and worthless from ages 4 to 10 because I failed hard at every test at school. They had me tested to make my retardation official to lock me up. I scored higher than anyone that walked into their office in the last 5 years.
-
Psychopaths and sociopaths are some of the smartest and shrewdest people around, yet the vast majority of them have menial jobs. It's the indifference that does it, for the most part.
@JustineBieberxoxo your response isnt really relevant to my comment.. hes pretty cocky to belittle darwins iq (which is still a gifted iq) when darwin is the father of evolution and this guys done nothing
@prrsh612 Oh, sorry, my mother's tongue isn't English, so I'm not sure, if I should've written a comma (I suspect I should've) in front of "Justine". You see, I permitted myself to ask Justine if s/he feels s/he is a "sociopath" , but I didn't use separate message (saving 1 post). :-)
@blurrybigfoot74:.....[the mega-ellipse, of course, references that of your remark, extending it aka elaborating "as if" your faint assessment had continued ... w/ actual substance & significant meaning (ouch!)]...(beginning where you leave off at "interesting people"), so that he can a) deftly set them up, using a magazine of stealth not so obvious-- during production --editorial|directorial techniques that ultimately serve to b) undercut, c) induce self-mockery via tessellation: MOCK the "SME"
@LongandGeneric: Not-so-fast Mister. While LogicCheck-LC's posts are feisty, funny and irreverent, to say the least, they, nonetheless seem-- at least to me --to display their own command of eg, logic (deductive & assort other types). Purposely, I refrain from engaging LC much, since on numerous occasions his "parroting" formulations have taken me aback: begrudgingly reverential ie, snide remarks. This AM, I notice that LC, too, appreciates my mimicry humor w/ DITTO posting me -- not so funny
LongandGeneric: Your comment, re CarCriticAssessor flatters me. However, try though I may, my writing simply does not quite match the reaches in his or hers. Inevitably, were I to read, re-read and re-re-read your compendium of posts ... dangerously [[wink]], assimilation of your style and tics might egg me on to ape you (inadvertently of course) without really ever trying too hard! LMFAO!!!!
@LongandGeneric: Not-so-fast Mister. While LogicCheck-LC's posts are feisty, funny and irreverent, to say the least, they, nonetheless seem-- at least to me --to display their own command of eg, logic (deductive & assort other types). Purposely, I refrain from engaging LC much, since on numerous occasions his "parroting" formulations have taken me aback: begrudgingly reverential ie, snide remarks. This AM, I notice that he, too, appreciates my mimicry humor w/ DITTO posting me
@souldude81: Say -- so do I...getting packed, 'cause these people are WHACK-A-DOODLES! See: Operation Blackjack. Most NWO stalwarts are neither high, super-high nor mega-high IQ Test score holders. Most of them, according to one mega-high IQ MD & Ph.D. score holder's online "names & scores" compilation, form a bell-curve BELOW that of the standard Benet apex. What that means is that by far the brightest and the best are EXCLUDED from NWO's Control Pyramid: unruly FEMA gulag fodder!!
@anomaly19851: Your "litmus test for lifetime success measurement" rates deeply flawed & foolishly obviates eg, "dispositional genetics"; these: non-conformists | anarchists | hermits | unimpressed and/or those whom eschew avarice: fore-or-aft bourgeois predilections, urgencies, values, environment et cetera. Chris Langan appears a) intelligent, b) none-too-familiar with accrued scholarship legacies, c) conflicted as to his "marginalized worldly bid status": Fungibility Rejection
@1pineshooter1: LMAO!!! You clearly graduated, if you did, from the lower % of your class!! For starters, my own casual punctuation in my posts is ok online, but would fail in corp; but, clearly, my writing demonstrates that I know the rules! Whereas, being that you don't have a clue as to nor grasp advanced/sophisticated punctuation, re simple, compound and/or complex sentence structure & sharp syntax, u proceed, too dumb to know u're dumb, spamming superbright CarCritic: WTF bro
Hey everybody, check out what CarCritic says and watch how he bitch slaps robertsorobert1, owns EveryCallOfDuty and the others who retaliate from public humiliation of being pistol whipped by brianiac mega-Assessor CarCritic and his his comments by marking them over and over and over as spam!!!!
LMFAO, fail!!
Get this (type or copy and paste it in your utube search):
*brianiac slow motion slap
LMFAO
Vote up CarCriticAssessor, a badass HAND OF TRUTH, fighting for the American Dream!!!!
@souldude81: Does that mean that you don not approve of Chris Langan and/or some other person(s) here on the forum? Thanks in advance for adding to the discussion.
@robertsonrobert1: Rest assured that yours truly commands a vetted 175 score [on a 175 index: all answers correct; "Welcome to MENSA" notification etc.]. As to whether or not you would "give me $10,000.00": For conveyance via eg, a third-party TESTAMENTARY doc....ok, provided that the funds were held in an NON-REVOKABLE escrow, according to an attorney DRAFTED Terms & Conditions Agreement (paid for by you: since, you posit the challenge), approvable by me: no wiggle-room. Roll?
@MegaDowson: FALSE; calculation agility counts as one aspect of any
unimpeachable intelligence test. Over the recent two decades--hailing
eg, from Schenectady, NY to Venice Beach, CA--multivariate [stats]
analysts focused on cognition verses mere encyclopedic or achievement-based
aka knowledge recall hybrid tests. Emergent tests--dare I say accurately--access & assess creative thinking prowess. Among my favorites hails that already mentioned. Edward Alf was the smartest mathematician ktm
@redeemer61190: That is yet another "interesting" inestimable--one of a recent crop of outrageous rapid-growth-exotics-indices--claim, which defies any extant standard, so what the HELL does that mean...that yours truly and my ilk would need to seek out & clobber some new three-ring circus "hoop holder's" perch, or run-down another steeplechase steward on some disturbing, obstacle strewn, cross-country course: BUNK, I conjecture, from what I know of IQ-Test formulation: laudable, yet laughable.
CL, juggle, among fallacies, logic-leaps. Post hoc ergo propter hoc: coincidental correlation sans causation: mal conclusion/s, solely upon events’ order vs. apt factors ass., correlation may or might rule out concatenation|linkage. EX: A occurs; then B::A 'cuz B? Rooster’s AM 'cuz sunrise? My maxim adherence: “Required, covariation data, alone, does not affirm causality”. In|De-ductive reasoning can beguile eg, “Texas Sharpshooter” doom; Euler’s|Venn diagrams; Failure Logic; Mierscheid’s law?
A-OKAY: All tolled & despite his "every man 'ism, raised in adversity, low-brow, Plastic -- Dyed Hair 'wannbe studly' -- Messiah routine...a la Eddie & the Cruisers"; despite trite rhetoric & orchestration...discounting, too, his "scripting & presentation shortcomings"...he's funny, in a mocumentary manner, as he "aligns himself with the prevailing powers-to-be" [or at least those he perceives might well respond to & bring him on-board the NWO gravy-train (FEMA)]: I like him; he's smart: lol
EVALUATION: Mr. Chris Langan posits an array of convolution. As a verified 175 out of a possible 175 IQ-Test holder [Universal IQ-Test for Military Pilots], I find that his phraseology eg, "present time" -- redundant; since, "presently" or "currently" (adverb) suffices: terse selectivity -- bespeaks a "core fraudulence" ie, at best he rates as an ill-conceived hustler of cliché Malthusian "scarcity" ill-logic; and, at worst, his obesity paired to dyed hair, apes despotic incisiveness: DORK
@CarCriticAssessor Your comment is utterly pointless. Had it ever occur to you that not every smart person needs to be incomprehensible in order to sound smart? Mr. Langan might have elucidated one convolution if had articulated a mathematical problem.
@souldude81: PARSING: a) my commentary delivers numerous germane points; b) my comments rate incisive, caustic, and funny as well as far reaching, while remaining accessible to a myriad of IQ-levels; SMART READs, indeed; d) Chris Langan's -- no need for your diction shift, re vainglorious psychopathic adulation -- diatribe bespeaks a psychiatric disorder...elucidation....'err circular reasoning foists his convoluted NWO pitch: his conceptual "benign" omnipotent despotism all fails
@CarCriticAssessor It's not difficult to understand you because you say something profound, but because you intentionally try to be obtuse. You might very well be MENSA smart, but in my experience, intelligent people are strong communicators. Your verbosity masquerades a shallow condescending tone; that I could sum up in one sentence. I pay my respects you know a lot of words, but that doesn't mean you use them in the correct instances. An Ad-hominem is the last resort of an irrational person.
@souldude81: Your mangled retort registers as blithering tripe. Incisive, succinct and mega-compressed exposition is often misconstrued by those whose ken it exceeds: your dross verifies and validates that assertion ... unwittingly: lol. "Scoop-the-poop", as you get lost on the sidewalks -- amid dark, dank and confusing skid-row alleyways -- that comprise the navigational routes of your "clearly erudite (giggles) mind". Yikes; Scram; Pow; Boom; Bam; Jump!
@CarCriticAssessor (laughs) A little bit insecure maybe? Thanks for validating my point, you don't actually say anything relevant. You simply offer up a cytokine storm of prose that are actually insults in disguise. If only there was an intelligent thought some where in your derivative gibber jab, I could actually have a meaningful discussion with you.
@CarCriticAssessor a) No your didn't. Ad-hominems are not german points they are rather a symptom of emotional instability. b) Says who? No one has commented on your post besides me. Don't you know its narcissistic to believe in your self-testimony? Where's C? d) Prove it. When logic fails even the smartest man resorts to name calling.
@darkunorthodox: Your advanced reading skills are only exceeded by your remedial analytical abilities: kudos to your for having had come that far in life! However, not once empirically or otherwise has Chris Langan's posited mega-high-IQ score-- the assumption being that he might well perform equally well on the IQ test regarded most highly by me, which has already been broached elsewhere: The Universal IQ for Military Pilots --been assailed; instead, topical fallacies etc zapped
@metamemetics: Glad to see another anti-Malthusian proponent orate. Ted Steele's embrace of Jean-Baptiste de la Marck checks denigration: "the ultimate Darwinian put-down" FKA "a lamark 'ism". That slur is no longer brandished among the informed. Nonetheless, the New Order crew -- a massive geo-political consortium -- ass-wipes eg, NASA, the Rockefeller & Ford foundations, along w/ IIEs et al agencies foist "Climate Change" & "Sustainability", re REX-84 & Agenda 21, as per a FEMA run futurology
Okay -- I notice that studdly (sic) should read studly, except that, owing to the retro cartoon series' Duddly|Dudley DoRight impression...lol. Come'n, 'poor bastard 's been kicked around, akin to that '70's "live like a refugee ...." song's lyrics. 'Would 've likely ended-up another duc d' Orleans, w/ a massive Louis XIV chip, no? His cephalic index "off-the-page" reference -- though a 7 7/8 hat size here -- adds laughs ... but, I do like 'em; it's hard resisting jibes
When posed question #1 gets some love. This began with you stating he wasn't a smart person and hasn't accomplished anything, which led to me asking what your criticisms of the CMTU were. Lacking notoriety and prevalence in the scientific community are not legitimate criticisms. To be clear, of course he has nothing on Einstein or Darwin and isn't the ideal role model. I just want to make sure you're not discrediting him because he carries himself arrogantly and doesn't have any popular works.
@Vaerah Since "atmhso" didn't ask you any question, I'll consider that your reply means that you think I'm the same person as he is, which I'm not. I didn't say anything about Langan's CTMU, or that he isn't smart. I was just asking you to name his other very important works etc., because you claimed they exist. Of course you're right about popularity etc., but it seems that your claim stems from Langan's supposed IQ, which is also wrong way for proving importance of one's work.
@mujotomi Also you can't count his supposedly stolen concepts into his opus of important works, because their existence isn't a sure thing, let alone their importance.
@Vaerah: Re-check your touted role models: They have already taken crashing ... utterly THUNDEROUS falls, disintegrating, rightfully, into nano-particulate dust-if-i-cation: to remain dis-assemblages for the ages: CHARLATANS, and they and their THEORIES were pegged as much by a stalwart if "silenced" cavalcade of superb thinkers...contemporaneously and now; yet the sheep-people (sheople) academia [a centralized & vociferous Psi-Op org], foundations & oligarchical run media obviate TRUTH
@CarCriticAssessor: Hey you comments man! Have to say that you're a brianiac from hell!! It seems that you like to do onto those whom bug you what happens here on utube:
*brainiac slow motion slap
U got my vote for Master Brianiac of the Moment, hands down (on somebody's face): LMFAO! Even so, my guess is that your ego is extra healthy as his and you're hard to get along with for long. Like how u KO shit. Don't KO my IQ, but SAT hit 3 700's+ CMF!!!U peace out there!!
@moonboots69: Actually, that counts (acting) as one of his fail-stress-test personality defects. He should eg, study online Sharon Stone's Catherine Trammel-CT (sic) character depiction; specifically, that of her screen test for the role. While it is not recommended that he spread his legs, while crossing them, in a skirt, any time soon (at least not publicly), it is recommended that he ditch the NWO mantra, light up a 'rette & affect a "counterpart swagger" to CT--the chick: lol
@moonboots69: Conjure up something else, something that would elevate your commentary to some level above cliche, evoked, as is your case, by self-anointed proselytizers, whom envy invigorants, saltation and high-velocity ruminations, for want of recalcitrants to some PANTHEIST vagary aka "green 'ism": go eat some plants, masticate some flesh, and flush a toilet, for starters you twerp: get real. Perhaps, too, you ought not count me among your friends, troubled or otherwise; no?
The thing that bothers me about this video is that Chris makes use of some false information. Albert Einstein's and Charles Darwin's respective existences predate I.Q. tests by some time. Neither of them ever took an I.Q. test. These scores commonly attributed to them are entirely theoretical and based on a different set of criteria than an I.Q. test would measure. In other words, they are estimates. The low I.Q. ascribed to Darwin is probably thanks to a creationist wishing to debunk evolution.
@Ejexion Darwin himself said that he had difficulty memorizing simple poems, so his self-reported poor memory probably goes a long way in explaining why later psychologists gave him such a lower score.
A smart person doesn't tell people they're smart. Anyway, if he's panning Charles Darwin, he clearly can't respect genuine genius over his own logical ability - which is what IQ tests measure.
This guy is a joke. If you want a smart role model, choose someone who actually accomplishes things.
@Ejexion Hitler accomplished things, therefore to not be evil we must sit on our butts and ponder, like this fellow? How will that ever benefit mankind?
@Ejexion Then I suggest you use Chris as your rolemodel. Personally, I think Einstein fills both of our criteria far better. When Chris spoke of how he was smarter than Einstein, I declared him a waste of time :)
@atmhso That's a fair blanket for dealing with most of the world's people, but not true of multiple geniuses over time. I'm sorry, but you simply know nothing about this man. He wrote the Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe among other very important works, and he's had various concepts stolen - not going to waste any more time. People willing to assert such a degree of ignorance as to say this man hasn't accomplished anything wouldn't have the slightest idea of what to do with it anyway.
@atmhso Significance is not proportional to popularity. I could chalk this down to another radical youtube opinion but I'm appalled that a substantive model grounded in reasoning would even jokingly be contrasted with a sci-fi author's fantasy. If our world recognized half of its greatest quiet achievements in the fields of medical, psychological, philosophical and [...] research it would show no resemblance. What are your criticisms aside from its attention (which Scientology does get)?
@Vaerah "He wrote the Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe among other very important works, and he's had various concepts stolen - not going to waste any more time." You shouldn't be so timid. Don't stop there, waste some more time. I'm just curious.
@Vaerah So what's gonna be? Will you provide us with his "other very important works" and proofs regarding stolen goods or not? Or will that ignorance thing have to be used against you?
If any presidential candidate spoke even half as eloquent, verbose and punctual as this man I would vote for them on the spot. If none of these statements are prepared and he's truly just speaking from off the top of his head then I'm rather jealous. He also, despite not holding back any of his unconventional political beliefs, is incredibly tact as revealed in the the later parts.
8:25 "I found the whole experience of school highly annoying. I think I could have wrapped the whole thing up in a couple of years, instead they managed to keep me around for twelve hahahaha"
4:55 "I could get straight As in school without doing a thing, so I skipped a few grades."
If he skipped a grade, he would have been in school 11 years. If he had skipped "a few grades" he would have been there 10 at most.
@DrQuijano so what are you saying? that hes lying? well he went to school in the sixties, in a rural area, so maybe they decided that he had to graduate with his class.
Ok that was mainly Rehtorical When I was using Obama as an example. My point is that a more Technocratic type of leadership is my idea of progress. And my other point is the fact that people will automatically have respect for leaders that they can identify with. Most people can't identify with someone like Langon so they automatically feel insulted by his superiority rather than acknowledge it especially when he sounds like a robot when he specks about Eugenics.
@shamelessfootfucker That's great that Oboma is intellegent, although cunning is more accurate in my opinion and thats a whole other issue, but my point is why settle for only intellegent when you can have highly extremely intellegent.
@shamelessfootfucker Unless that person professes loyalty to the same sorts of things exalted by regular folks, patriotism, team spirit.. Homer Simpson type stuff. When I was in school, the smart kids were popular, but the smart weird kids were not. This notion that smart kids are hated is easier to laugh off. You can't be so dismissive of socialization toward seeking out and having contempt for weakness in others. That's uglier and harder to laugh off as "just a part of life".
The point being is that If people had the choice of voting for Langan over a handsom, tall, spontanious, and perhaps a good guitar player, type of person, people would most likey choose the latter because that personality type would register more easily in an emotianl brain, not to mention that society at large is utterly obsessed with being entertained and that they can identify with that type , rather than choose a cold machine like rational type.
His IQ is meaningless. He had no classical training. "Charles Darwin was way down there in the toilet". Fucking causal. "Are you a genius?" "YES" Fucking Intellectually inept FAGGOT. He was removed from the Gueniss Book of World Records, BECAUSE HE IS A HACK.
@MuchContractForYou The three videos you have posted on your youtube account are runescape... and you're really going to try and say a man is unintellectual by calling him a "faggot" and cursing every other sentence? please, for the love of reason, move out of the United States. Go to the Democratic Republic of Congo or some other irreparably damaged third world country where you cannot continue damaging what petty respect we have from other developed countries.
@sweeperisback Here is a pro tip. If they say that their IQ means something, they are NOT a genius. If they say they are a genius, they are NOT a genius.
I consider myself moderately intelligent but to base myself vs some one like Darwin on a scale as biased as Intelligent Quotient, with a gap of 100 years of science and technology is BLATANTLY BULLSHIT.
@sweeperisback And as for my intelligence and my ability to comment on how anti-intellectual this idiot is, based on the 3 videos I have posted, is called finding correlation from the inverse. This man is an idiot, and an atheist like you (from checking your subs) should agree with me 100%
@sweeperisback Well, if I'm not mistaken, Americans took care for such countries to be "irreparably damaged", so yes, just send them over some more of your good stuff...Petty respect arises predominantly from the fact that US had too many missions with best intentions.
@simplycomplicated333 : The trolls burn the people who bother, I bother to bother the trolls LOL --- the ones who say anything bright back were just playing and I read out of context, the rest are that dumb and ARE easy targets ;-) Find me on facebook, just setup an account to play with this - Logic Jesus :-)
@Youtube Audience: I am attempting to use my new found "ability" here as I find myself able to relate to Chris (instead of just wishing like before POP) I am starting to gather / post notes / take questions that I might know but not know I know.. Right Brain access = TONS I don't know till asked. Using Science / Logic while applying the fact that I'm a Film Producer... so telling stories? Check LOL. I Love Logic / making sense of things that bother me - find me on Facebook/1+ as Logic Jesus :-)
@Standuble Right Brain dominant seems to be a key to being faster / more artistic / wanting to hear me. Left still HUGE here b/c you are reading this - LEFT is winning ATM :-) Once I saw that connection hardcore obvious, i knew that I was going to have to tell this story / concept on youtube to even BE HEARD by Left dominant people. 1 side over other isn't the key - key is the com between 2 :-)
Anyone else out there who can do this? Till about a month ago I wished... stress pop later I can do this easy now. Yes I found him googling myself way back (lol) but couldn't relate... now I can. WAY hard to describe - very real and I'm explaining with science, just not sure who to tell :-)
Eh... intelligence or smartness is relevant to an individual. INTPs, INTJs (MBTI reference) are brilliant different. I may be more intelligent in my way than he is in his way. Same with everyone. Hail the INTJ forever!
I don't understand much about Langan's CTMU, because - let's face us - most of us seem downright chicle-brained compared to somebody in the IQ stratosphere. Still, in a few decades, the children of the elite will all have Langan level IQ's due to genetic-tinkering. Imagine the wealth disparity when the "average" worker has to compete with someone who earned their Bachelor's before they hit puberty.
@CottonPoisonwood Sounds like the recipe for a revolution. But if it did come to that many would revolt not to crush the elite but to join them. I for one would love a bit of genetic tampering on my part so I can experience the essence of genius, if only in part.
@Standuble I'm pretty sure I just found out that genius is more about Right Brain access from the Left ---- no need to tamper with the genetics from my theory, just pop the right "membrane?" in the brain to allow the faster blood flow. A-B Difference. I'm working on video to break it all down. I figured out WAY too much too fast, now I convert that back to language LOL ;-)
@porkyminch01: Mercy me, the logic-crushing power of hyperbole. On the other hand, people are getting taller. I think we can probably chock that one up to better nutrition rather than the "all-consuming" virility of black manhood. Dat ain't no shit, ya'll. Muhfuggahs.
Not only did Langan create the CTMU, he also cobbled together the "Original Recipe" from leptons, bubble-gum, and the rusty spring in an old Pez Dispenser. THEN, he built a time-machine, which he promptly used to deliver said formula to one Harland "Colonel" Sanders. Say "Thank You", America.
@simplycomplicated333 If you're above average, you either get on Comedy Central and do this with a smile or you try to slow down for slower people. You are a slow person, try to guess WHY he is brilliant. You won't. You're too slow to understand, I'm sorry :-P
@JasonLanganVideo loll...I'm definitely not the smartest out there. But Langan is no more relevant to the world than a kid flipping burgers at McDonalds. He postures like he's king of the world. He's this super genius with 0 accomplishments to back up his high scores on a test which he took several times. You wanna see genius. Go to TED.com. Those are geniuses. These "above average" people managed to out smart this guy in every way with their TRUE genius. Keep nuthugging :-P
@simplycomplicated333 I'm ALWAYS going to appreciate anything besides a DERRR response - you did that so I thank you :-) I will look into that for sure. A point that I can easily see having "popped" into being able to relate to this (past just wishing I got this) - was seeing the god awful social differences that occur from that POV. Knowing where to start working your way out when no one shows you - that's hard to figure out...
@JasonLanganVideo - I try not to reply with the standard youtube troll fest.
You'll love that website, I'm sure of it because if THIS guy can wow you, then the presenters on those video's will knock you on your ass with their ideas. ;)
How the fuck does he work in a BAR? If he is the smartest man alive, why doesn't he make some good research or why does nasa or the pentagon hide him somewhere and make him work on some army stuff? There are so many contradictions regarding this dude...
@Invesigator i can eat an AMERICAN alphabet soup and shit a better argument...
any american can do what he/she likes and of course suffer the necessary consequences, like living in a broke and falling apart state, and by your definition america is an anarchist state... we stupid europeans always knew america is full of savages
Look, look. We may have our differences in terms of our point of view on Langan, but we all know that he would pwn Hawking in an arm-wrestling tournament.
I am a lightweight compared to this guy, and here are my first impressions: 1) he thinks like Spinoza, that is good; 2) he thinks like Plato, that is both good and extremely scary.
This guy's ideas are going to take up my time for awhile.
@shamelessfootfucker The problem is, if the world were finally made a good place (in so far as mankind wasn't adding problems to problems that naturally exist), about half the people would think it was a bad place (for dumb reasons).
world's best IQ test taker is more like it. Worlds smartest man? fuck no
blobofrob 1 day ago
anyone else find this very funny for some reason?
buckeytwoeyes 2 days ago
chris langan owned your face biatch!
buckeytwoeyes 2 days ago
stupid theory
avq5 3 days ago
This and Rick Rosner, WHAT'S WITH THE BOUNCER THING AND GENIUS
MrAmritasya 4 days ago
I don't think Chris understands the binary logic of faith :-) Faith is a principle of power and is needed even with people who have knowledge. Faith does things that knowledge can't. Why do you think God would want us to develop faith unless it was important.
rexbreed 1 week ago
Wow. Just goes to prove that IQ tests do not cover the gamut of intelligence. This guy has his head up his ass.
TheJoyfulPianist 1 week ago
I just watched the whole video series of chris langan, looking to be blown away, and I find myself mad after watching this. First off, he does not even have a college degree, not even an associates, or bachelors, NONE! Secondly to assume you’re the smartest person on the planet is laughable, as there are numerous others who have scored above 200 on IQ tests. Thirdly, he works in a bar; do I need to say more? HE MAY HAVE A HIGH IQ, BUT HE CLEARLY HAS NO COMMON SENSE OR PEOPLE SKILLS, WHAT A WASTE
TheJuiceIsBack 1 week ago
@TheJuiceIsBack
Actually there is only 1 person who has scored above 200 in an IQ test and it is Kim Ung-Yong, the worlds highest IQ with a score of 210, he graduated university at 7 and was employed by NASA at the age of 8 to be a physicist, then he left NASA at 16 and went home to become an engineer.
6NoHope9 1 day ago
the question is how did he cheat the iq test? This guy comes off as a fraud!
sqwale7 2 weeks ago
To qualify the Einstein bit, the estimate I'd heard was 150, not the 180 Langan states here.
TomVodkaCollins 3 weeks ago
I have to confess that I'm going into this video not wanting to like this guy due to the unholy coupling of his alleged intellect and his alleged theism. For someone, that being me, who's not far south of Einstein, I consider my intellect a large contributor to my atheism as every theist I've ever personally known was a moron. Even if they don't lack IQ, their thought possesses have been twisted by the theistic culture they were reared in so they are only capable of circular reasoning.
TomVodkaCollins 3 weeks ago
@TomVodkaCollins
and when you people get NEAR DEATH EXPERIENCES, you convert.
ArunRaa 1 week ago
Comment removed
version191 3 weeks ago
So sum up the video he likes minimum wage. Sounds brilliant to me.
mke1njb 3 weeks ago
I love Chris Langan, honest, kind and brilliant guy...
ThePaul1E 3 weeks ago
@20BCeltics You should never exist. BE MAD.
htddu908 3 weeks ago
Some of you people have no idea what you're talking about. Langan is a genius, near-unrivalled in intellect. You should look up and read his paper on the Cognitive-Theoretic model; most of you wouldn't even understand what he's talking about, let alone the underlying principles of the theory. Sadly he isn't the most intelligent man in the world. There is a guy from Korea who was a guest Professor at Harvard at the age of 8.
dotdotdashed 4 weeks ago
This guy is a joke.
20BCeltics 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dang, and upon listening to his third part, It is a good thing he is just a bouncer
ultim4t32 1 month ago
Dang, and upon listening to his third part, It is a good thing he is just a bouncer
ultim4t32 1 month ago
Having a high IQ doesn't mean that he wants to fulfill the world's expectations for him. Perhaps he is happy with a simple life and not a lot of expectations. What is wrong with that?
ultim4t32 1 month ago
"I could have wrapped the whole thing up in a few years" Then why didn't you? If you really had an IQ of 200+ you would realize that doing your schoolwork and graduating early and going straight to college is far more logical of a choice than getting into fights and not doing anything. Also, way down in the toilet? So sorry Charles Darwin doesn't live up to your bully expectations. He needs to get over himself. IQ is not a measure of capabilities, as we see here.
ppatricide 1 month ago
This is the saddest video I've ver seen. Not the video; the comments.
ion010101 1 month ago
"charles darwin is way down there in the toilet at 135".. hey guy you still work at a bar
prrsh612 1 month ago
@prrsh612 I was told I was dumb and worthless from ages 4 to 10 because I failed hard at every test at school. They had me tested to make my retardation official to lock me up. I scored higher than anyone that walked into their office in the last 5 years.
-
Psychopaths and sociopaths are some of the smartest and shrewdest people around, yet the vast majority of them have menial jobs. It's the indifference that does it, for the most part.
JustineBieberxoxo 1 month ago
@JustineBieberxoxo your response isnt really relevant to my comment.. hes pretty cocky to belittle darwins iq (which is still a gifted iq) when darwin is the father of evolution and this guys done nothing
prrsh612 1 month ago
@prrsh612 Here's a(nother) relevant response: he doesn't work in a bar anymore.
I think Justine wanted to say Langan may be a "sociopath". Maybe s/he even wanted to say s/he is one also. Are you Justine?
mujotomi 1 month ago
<--- no im prrsh612 @mujotomi
prrsh612 1 month ago
@prrsh612 Oh, sorry, my mother's tongue isn't English, so I'm not sure, if I should've written a comma (I suspect I should've) in front of "Justine". You see, I permitted myself to ask Justine if s/he feels s/he is a "sociopath" , but I didn't use separate message (saving 1 post). :-)
mujotomi 1 month ago
You are not the smartest man in the world. Sorry.
Moxormog 1 month ago
He has a 190-210 IQ, now, what have you done? Nothing.
JoeAlvEsp 1 month ago
I'm thinking that was really an ego test he took, not an I.Q. test.
pompousprick 1 month ago 2
He isn't that bright.
NightSchifter 1 month ago
He bases his IQ score off of a at home IQ test. He's full of shit.
LudwigLobsters 1 month ago
Why smartest? Why not wisest?
Aphex279 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@blurrybigfoot74:.....[the mega-ellipse, of course, references that of your remark, extending it aka elaborating "as if" your faint assessment had continued ... w/ actual substance & significant meaning (ouch!)]...(beginning where you leave off at "interesting people"), so that he can a) deftly set them up, using a magazine of stealth not so obvious-- during production --editorial|directorial techniques that ultimately serve to b) undercut, c) induce self-mockery via tessellation: MOCK the "SME"
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LongandGeneric: Not-so-fast Mister. While LogicCheck-LC's posts are feisty, funny and irreverent, to say the least, they, nonetheless seem-- at least to me --to display their own command of eg, logic (deductive & assort other types). Purposely, I refrain from engaging LC much, since on numerous occasions his "parroting" formulations have taken me aback: begrudgingly reverential ie, snide remarks. This AM, I notice that LC, too, appreciates my mimicry humor w/ DITTO posting me -- not so funny
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
Comment removed
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LongandGeneric: Your comment, re CarCriticAssessor flatters me. However, try though I may, my writing simply does not quite match the reaches in his or hers. Inevitably, were I to read, re-read and re-re-read your compendium of posts ... dangerously [[wink]], assimilation of your style and tics might egg me on to ape you (inadvertently of course) without really ever trying too hard! LMFAO!!!!
LogicCheck 1 month ago
Comment removed
LogicCheck 1 month ago
@CarCriticAssessor You and LogicCheck seem to be posting the same comments across several videos. What are you two up to?
LongandGeneric 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LongandGeneric: Not-so-fast Mister. While LogicCheck-LC's posts are feisty, funny and irreverent, to say the least, they, nonetheless seem-- at least to me --to display their own command of eg, logic (deductive & assort other types). Purposely, I refrain from engaging LC much, since on numerous occasions his "parroting" formulations have taken me aback: begrudgingly reverential ie, snide remarks. This AM, I notice that he, too, appreciates my mimicry humor w/ DITTO posting me
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@souldude81: Say -- so do I...getting packed, 'cause these people are WHACK-A-DOODLES! See: Operation Blackjack. Most NWO stalwarts are neither high, super-high nor mega-high IQ Test score holders. Most of them, according to one mega-high IQ MD & Ph.D. score holder's online "names & scores" compilation, form a bell-curve BELOW that of the standard Benet apex. What that means is that by far the brightest and the best are EXCLUDED from NWO's Control Pyramid: unruly FEMA gulag fodder!!
LogicCheck 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@anomaly19851: Your "litmus test for lifetime success measurement" rates deeply flawed & foolishly obviates eg, "dispositional genetics"; these: non-conformists | anarchists | hermits | unimpressed and/or those whom eschew avarice: fore-or-aft bourgeois predilections, urgencies, values, environment et cetera. Chris Langan appears a) intelligent, b) none-too-familiar with accrued scholarship legacies, c) conflicted as to his "marginalized worldly bid status": Fungibility Rejection
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago in playlist Chris Langan
Comment removed
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
who's directing this?
blaxors 1 month ago
I love you Chris Langan!!!!!!
ThePaul1E 1 month ago
@1pineshooter1: LMAO!!! You clearly graduated, if you did, from the lower % of your class!! For starters, my own casual punctuation in my posts is ok online, but would fail in corp; but, clearly, my writing demonstrates that I know the rules! Whereas, being that you don't have a clue as to nor grasp advanced/sophisticated punctuation, re simple, compound and/or complex sentence structure & sharp syntax, u proceed, too dumb to know u're dumb, spamming superbright CarCritic: WTF bro
LogicCheck 1 month ago
Hey everybody, check out what CarCritic says and watch how he bitch slaps robertsorobert1, owns EveryCallOfDuty and the others who retaliate from public humiliation of being pistol whipped by brianiac mega-Assessor CarCritic and his his comments by marking them over and over and over as spam!!!!
LMFAO, fail!!
Get this (type or copy and paste it in your utube search):
*brianiac slow motion slap
LMFAO
Vote up CarCriticAssessor, a badass HAND OF TRUTH, fighting for the American Dream!!!!
LogicCheck 1 month ago
@LogicCheck Nah I got better things to do. ;-)
souldude81 1 month ago
Yeap hes awsome, People who hate him is stupid close minded fools that could just have expand their minds a little bit more.
finnishsimon93 1 month ago
Comment removed
souldude81 1 month ago
@finnishsimon93 He only craves attention, and you sycophants only encourage him.
souldude81 1 month ago
@souldude81: Does that mean that you don not approve of Chris Langan and/or some other person(s) here on the forum? Thanks in advance for adding to the discussion.
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@robertsonrobert1: Rest assured that yours truly commands a vetted 175 score [on a 175 index: all answers correct; "Welcome to MENSA" notification etc.]. As to whether or not you would "give me $10,000.00": For conveyance via eg, a third-party TESTAMENTARY doc....ok, provided that the funds were held in an NON-REVOKABLE escrow, according to an attorney DRAFTED Terms & Conditions Agreement (paid for by you: since, you posit the challenge), approvable by me: no wiggle-room. Roll?
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MegaDowson: FALSE; calculation agility counts as one aspect of any
unimpeachable intelligence test. Over the recent two decades--hailing
eg, from Schenectady, NY to Venice Beach, CA--multivariate [stats]
analysts focused on cognition verses mere encyclopedic or achievement-based
aka knowledge recall hybrid tests. Emergent tests--dare I say accurately--access & assess creative thinking prowess. Among my favorites hails that already mentioned. Edward Alf was the smartest mathematician ktm
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
William James Sidis was estimated to have an IQ between 250 and 300.
Chris Langan in the toilet
redeemer61190 1 month ago
@redeemer61190: That is yet another "interesting" inestimable--one of a recent crop of outrageous rapid-growth-exotics-indices--claim, which defies any extant standard, so what the HELL does that mean...that yours truly and my ilk would need to seek out & clobber some new three-ring circus "hoop holder's" perch, or run-down another steeplechase steward on some disturbing, obstacle strewn, cross-country course: BUNK, I conjecture, from what I know of IQ-Test formulation: laudable, yet laughable.
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
CL, juggle, among fallacies, logic-leaps. Post hoc ergo propter hoc: coincidental correlation sans causation: mal conclusion/s, solely upon events’ order vs. apt factors ass., correlation may or might rule out concatenation|linkage. EX: A occurs; then B::A 'cuz B? Rooster’s AM 'cuz sunrise? My maxim adherence: “Required, covariation data, alone, does not affirm causality”. In|De-ductive reasoning can beguile eg, “Texas Sharpshooter” doom; Euler’s|Venn diagrams; Failure Logic; Mierscheid’s law?
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
Comment removed
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
Comment removed
souldude81 1 month ago
A-OKAY: All tolled & despite his "every man 'ism, raised in adversity, low-brow, Plastic -- Dyed Hair 'wannbe studly' -- Messiah routine...a la Eddie & the Cruisers"; despite trite rhetoric & orchestration...discounting, too, his "scripting & presentation shortcomings"...he's funny, in a mocumentary manner, as he "aligns himself with the prevailing powers-to-be" [or at least those he perceives might well respond to & bring him on-board the NWO gravy-train (FEMA)]: I like him; he's smart: lol
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
EVALUATION: Mr. Chris Langan posits an array of convolution. As a verified 175 out of a possible 175 IQ-Test holder [Universal IQ-Test for Military Pilots], I find that his phraseology eg, "present time" -- redundant; since, "presently" or "currently" (adverb) suffices: terse selectivity -- bespeaks a "core fraudulence" ie, at best he rates as an ill-conceived hustler of cliché Malthusian "scarcity" ill-logic; and, at worst, his obesity paired to dyed hair, apes despotic incisiveness: DORK
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
@CarCriticAssessor Your comment is utterly pointless. Had it ever occur to you that not every smart person needs to be incomprehensible in order to sound smart? Mr. Langan might have elucidated one convolution if had articulated a mathematical problem.
souldude81 1 month ago
@souldude81: PARSING: a) my commentary delivers numerous germane points; b) my comments rate incisive, caustic, and funny as well as far reaching, while remaining accessible to a myriad of IQ-levels; SMART READs, indeed; d) Chris Langan's -- no need for your diction shift, re vainglorious psychopathic adulation -- diatribe bespeaks a psychiatric disorder...elucidation....'err circular reasoning foists his convoluted NWO pitch: his conceptual "benign" omnipotent despotism all fails
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
@CarCriticAssessor It's not difficult to understand you because you say something profound, but because you intentionally try to be obtuse. You might very well be MENSA smart, but in my experience, intelligent people are strong communicators. Your verbosity masquerades a shallow condescending tone; that I could sum up in one sentence. I pay my respects you know a lot of words, but that doesn't mean you use them in the correct instances. An Ad-hominem is the last resort of an irrational person.
souldude81 1 month ago
@souldude81: Your mangled retort registers as blithering tripe. Incisive, succinct and mega-compressed exposition is often misconstrued by those whose ken it exceeds: your dross verifies and validates that assertion ... unwittingly: lol. "Scoop-the-poop", as you get lost on the sidewalks -- amid dark, dank and confusing skid-row alleyways -- that comprise the navigational routes of your "clearly erudite (giggles) mind". Yikes; Scram; Pow; Boom; Bam; Jump!
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
@CarCriticAssessor (laughs) A little bit insecure maybe? Thanks for validating my point, you don't actually say anything relevant. You simply offer up a cytokine storm of prose that are actually insults in disguise. If only there was an intelligent thought some where in your derivative gibber jab, I could actually have a meaningful discussion with you.
souldude81 1 month ago
@CarCriticAssessor a) No your didn't. Ad-hominems are not german points they are rather a symptom of emotional instability. b) Says who? No one has commented on your post besides me. Don't you know its narcissistic to believe in your self-testimony? Where's C? d) Prove it. When logic fails even the smartest man resorts to name calling.
souldude81 1 month ago
@CarCriticAssessor so basically, you discredit him bc obesity and hair cut?
darkunorthodox 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@darkunorthodox: Your advanced reading skills are only exceeded by your remedial analytical abilities: kudos to your for having had come that far in life! However, not once empirically or otherwise has Chris Langan's posited mega-high-IQ score-- the assumption being that he might well perform equally well on the IQ test regarded most highly by me, which has already been broached elsewhere: The Universal IQ for Military Pilots --been assailed; instead, topical fallacies etc zapped
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@metamemetics: Glad to see another anti-Malthusian proponent orate. Ted Steele's embrace of Jean-Baptiste de la Marck checks denigration: "the ultimate Darwinian put-down" FKA "a lamark 'ism". That slur is no longer brandished among the informed. Nonetheless, the New Order crew -- a massive geo-political consortium -- ass-wipes eg, NASA, the Rockefeller & Ford foundations, along w/ IIEs et al agencies foist "Climate Change" & "Sustainability", re REX-84 & Agenda 21, as per a FEMA run futurology
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago in playlist Chris Langan
This has been flagged as spam show
Okay -- I notice that studdly (sic) should read studly, except that, owing to the retro cartoon series' Duddly|Dudley DoRight impression...lol. Come'n, 'poor bastard 's been kicked around, akin to that '70's "live like a refugee ...." song's lyrics. 'Would 've likely ended-up another duc d' Orleans, w/ a massive Louis XIV chip, no? His cephalic index "off-the-page" reference -- though a 7 7/8 hat size here -- adds laughs ... but, I do like 'em; it's hard resisting jibes
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
When posed question #1 gets some love. This began with you stating he wasn't a smart person and hasn't accomplished anything, which led to me asking what your criticisms of the CMTU were. Lacking notoriety and prevalence in the scientific community are not legitimate criticisms. To be clear, of course he has nothing on Einstein or Darwin and isn't the ideal role model. I just want to make sure you're not discrediting him because he carries himself arrogantly and doesn't have any popular works.
Vaerah 1 month ago
@Vaerah Since "atmhso" didn't ask you any question, I'll consider that your reply means that you think I'm the same person as he is, which I'm not. I didn't say anything about Langan's CTMU, or that he isn't smart. I was just asking you to name his other very important works etc., because you claimed they exist. Of course you're right about popularity etc., but it seems that your claim stems from Langan's supposed IQ, which is also wrong way for proving importance of one's work.
mujotomi 1 month ago
@mujotomi Also you can't count his supposedly stolen concepts into his opus of important works, because their existence isn't a sure thing, let alone their importance.
mujotomi 1 month ago
@Vaerah: Re-check your touted role models: They have already taken crashing ... utterly THUNDEROUS falls, disintegrating, rightfully, into nano-particulate dust-if-i-cation: to remain dis-assemblages for the ages: CHARLATANS, and they and their THEORIES were pegged as much by a stalwart if "silenced" cavalcade of superb thinkers...contemporaneously and now; yet the sheep-people (sheople) academia [a centralized & vociferous Psi-Op org], foundations & oligarchical run media obviate TRUTH
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
@CarCriticAssessor He's not my role model, but your thesaurus is free to retort that.
Vaerah 1 month ago
@CarCriticAssessor: Hey you comments man! Have to say that you're a brianiac from hell!! It seems that you like to do onto those whom bug you what happens here on utube:
*brainiac slow motion slap
U got my vote for Master Brianiac of the Moment, hands down (on somebody's face): LMFAO! Even so, my guess is that your ego is extra healthy as his and you're hard to get along with for long. Like how u KO shit. Don't KO my IQ, but SAT hit 3 700's+ CMF!!!U peace out there!!
LogicCheck 1 month ago
he's a good actor...
moonboots69 2 months ago
@moonboots69: Actually, that counts (acting) as one of his fail-stress-test personality defects. He should eg, study online Sharon Stone's Catherine Trammel-CT (sic) character depiction; specifically, that of her screen test for the role. While it is not recommended that he spread his legs, while crossing them, in a skirt, any time soon (at least not publicly), it is recommended that he ditch the NWO mantra, light up a 'rette & affect a "counterpart swagger" to CT--the chick: lol
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
@CarCriticAssessor one cannot live on word salads alone.. go sit beside a brook, and listen carefully to its soothing babble my troubled friend.
moonboots69 1 month ago
@moonboots69: Conjure up something else, something that would elevate your commentary to some level above cliche, evoked, as is your case, by self-anointed proselytizers, whom envy invigorants, saltation and high-velocity ruminations, for want of recalcitrants to some PANTHEIST vagary aka "green 'ism": go eat some plants, masticate some flesh, and flush a toilet, for starters you twerp: get real. Perhaps, too, you ought not count me among your friends, troubled or otherwise; no?
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
@CarCriticAssessor "you twerp" that must be the most well thought out come back of all time. ;-)
souldude81 1 month ago
@souldude81: <|;-), icy: lol.
CarCriticAssessor 1 month ago
@CarCriticAssessor <|X-{} zzzzzzzz: ula.
souldude81 1 month ago
y are yal hating...smell some trolls
mack2real 2 months ago
The thing that bothers me about this video is that Chris makes use of some false information. Albert Einstein's and Charles Darwin's respective existences predate I.Q. tests by some time. Neither of them ever took an I.Q. test. These scores commonly attributed to them are entirely theoretical and based on a different set of criteria than an I.Q. test would measure. In other words, they are estimates. The low I.Q. ascribed to Darwin is probably thanks to a creationist wishing to debunk evolution.
Ejexion 2 months ago
@Ejexion Darwin himself said that he had difficulty memorizing simple poems, so his self-reported poor memory probably goes a long way in explaining why later psychologists gave him such a lower score.
ClamCrunchy 2 months ago
A smart person doesn't tell people they're smart. Anyway, if he's panning Charles Darwin, he clearly can't respect genuine genius over his own logical ability - which is what IQ tests measure.
This guy is a joke. If you want a smart role model, choose someone who actually accomplishes things.
atmhso 2 months ago
@atmhso Hitler accomplished something, so that's obviously not a stringent enough criteria. Obviously, you're not the role model we seek...
Ejexion 2 months ago
@Ejexion Hitler accomplished things, therefore to not be evil we must sit on our butts and ponder, like this fellow? How will that ever benefit mankind?
atmhso 2 months ago
@atmhso Action is the province of the simple. Deep thought is the province of genius. I favor the latter.
Ejexion 2 months ago
@Ejexion Then I suggest you use Chris as your rolemodel. Personally, I think Einstein fills both of our criteria far better. When Chris spoke of how he was smarter than Einstein, I declared him a waste of time :)
atmhso 2 months ago
@atmhso That's a fair blanket for dealing with most of the world's people, but not true of multiple geniuses over time. I'm sorry, but you simply know nothing about this man. He wrote the Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe among other very important works, and he's had various concepts stolen - not going to waste any more time. People willing to assert such a degree of ignorance as to say this man hasn't accomplished anything wouldn't have the slightest idea of what to do with it anyway.
Vaerah 2 months ago
@Vaerah Ah yes, the CMTU, that incredibly influential work that changed the world.
It's had 13 years to sink in, and it hasn't even made a dent.
It's about as significant as the average crackpot writings, and notably less significant than something as worthless as scientology.
atmhso 2 months ago
@atmhso Significance is not proportional to popularity. I could chalk this down to another radical youtube opinion but I'm appalled that a substantive model grounded in reasoning would even jokingly be contrasted with a sci-fi author's fantasy. If our world recognized half of its greatest quiet achievements in the fields of medical, psychological, philosophical and [...] research it would show no resemblance. What are your criticisms aside from its attention (which Scientology does get)?
Vaerah 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Vaerah "He wrote the Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe among other very important works, and he's had various concepts stolen - not going to waste any more time." You shouldn't be so timid. Don't stop there, waste some more time. I'm just curious.
mujotomi 2 months ago
@Vaerah So what's gonna be? Will you provide us with his "other very important works" and proofs regarding stolen goods or not? Or will that ignorance thing have to be used against you?
mujotomi 1 month ago
@atmhso LOL bc bein arrogant makes it impossible to be "smart" correct?
darkunorthodox 1 month ago
man i swear this guy should be president
pinoypr1d3 2 months ago
Furthermore, If you read my previous statement backwards... you would've read it the wrong way.
LongandGeneric 2 months ago
If any presidential candidate spoke even half as eloquent, verbose and punctual as this man I would vote for them on the spot. If none of these statements are prepared and he's truly just speaking from off the top of his head then I'm rather jealous. He also, despite not holding back any of his unconventional political beliefs, is incredibly tact as revealed in the the later parts.
LongandGeneric 2 months ago
8:25 "I found the whole experience of school highly annoying. I think I could have wrapped the whole thing up in a couple of years, instead they managed to keep me around for twelve hahahaha"
4:55 "I could get straight As in school without doing a thing, so I skipped a few grades."
If he skipped a grade, he would have been in school 11 years. If he had skipped "a few grades" he would have been there 10 at most.
DrQuijano 2 months ago
@DrQuijano In part 2 he speaks of being in college.
LongandGeneric 2 months ago
@DrQuijano so what are you saying? that hes lying? well he went to school in the sixties, in a rural area, so maybe they decided that he had to graduate with his class.
aaronvespro 2 months ago
Ok that was mainly Rehtorical When I was using Obama as an example. My point is that a more Technocratic type of leadership is my idea of progress. And my other point is the fact that people will automatically have respect for leaders that they can identify with. Most people can't identify with someone like Langon so they automatically feel insulted by his superiority rather than acknowledge it especially when he sounds like a robot when he specks about Eugenics.
shamelessfootfucker 2 months ago
@shamelessfootfucker That's great that Oboma is intellegent, although cunning is more accurate in my opinion and thats a whole other issue, but my point is why settle for only intellegent when you can have highly extremely intellegent.
shamelessfootfucker 2 months ago
No body likes a know it all. People don't usually look up to extremely rational intellegent types of people, they usually just feel insulted.
shamelessfootfucker 2 months ago
@shamelessfootfucker Unless that person professes loyalty to the same sorts of things exalted by regular folks, patriotism, team spirit.. Homer Simpson type stuff. When I was in school, the smart kids were popular, but the smart weird kids were not. This notion that smart kids are hated is easier to laugh off. You can't be so dismissive of socialization toward seeking out and having contempt for weakness in others. That's uglier and harder to laugh off as "just a part of life".
ion010101 2 months ago
The point being is that If people had the choice of voting for Langan over a handsom, tall, spontanious, and perhaps a good guitar player, type of person, people would most likey choose the latter because that personality type would register more easily in an emotianl brain, not to mention that society at large is utterly obsessed with being entertained and that they can identify with that type , rather than choose a cold machine like rational type.
shamelessfootfucker 2 months ago
His IQ is meaningless. He had no classical training. "Charles Darwin was way down there in the toilet". Fucking causal. "Are you a genius?" "YES" Fucking Intellectually inept FAGGOT. He was removed from the Gueniss Book of World Records, BECAUSE HE IS A HACK.
MuchContractForYou 2 months ago
@MuchContractForYou The three videos you have posted on your youtube account are runescape... and you're really going to try and say a man is unintellectual by calling him a "faggot" and cursing every other sentence? please, for the love of reason, move out of the United States. Go to the Democratic Republic of Congo or some other irreparably damaged third world country where you cannot continue damaging what petty respect we have from other developed countries.
Thank you
sweeperisback 2 months ago
@sweeperisback Here is a pro tip. If they say that their IQ means something, they are NOT a genius. If they say they are a genius, they are NOT a genius.
I consider myself moderately intelligent but to base myself vs some one like Darwin on a scale as biased as Intelligent Quotient, with a gap of 100 years of science and technology is BLATANTLY BULLSHIT.
MuchContractForYou 2 months ago
@sweeperisback And as for my intelligence and my ability to comment on how anti-intellectual this idiot is, based on the 3 videos I have posted, is called finding correlation from the inverse. This man is an idiot, and an atheist like you (from checking your subs) should agree with me 100%
MuchContractForYou 2 months ago
@sweeperisback Well, if I'm not mistaken, Americans took care for such countries to be "irreparably damaged", so yes, just send them over some more of your good stuff...Petty respect arises predominantly from the fact that US had too many missions with best intentions.
mujotomi 2 months ago
@MuchContractForYou you ndo know youre a troll right.
aaronvespro 2 months ago
@MuchContractForYou im sure Euler would disagree
darkunorthodox 1 month ago
@simplycomplicated333 : The trolls burn the people who bother, I bother to bother the trolls LOL --- the ones who say anything bright back were just playing and I read out of context, the rest are that dumb and ARE easy targets ;-) Find me on facebook, just setup an account to play with this - Logic Jesus :-)
JasonLanganVideo 2 months ago
@Youtube Audience: I am attempting to use my new found "ability" here as I find myself able to relate to Chris (instead of just wishing like before POP) I am starting to gather / post notes / take questions that I might know but not know I know.. Right Brain access = TONS I don't know till asked. Using Science / Logic while applying the fact that I'm a Film Producer... so telling stories? Check LOL. I Love Logic / making sense of things that bother me - find me on Facebook/1+ as Logic Jesus :-)
LogicJesus 2 months ago
@Standuble Right Brain dominant seems to be a key to being faster / more artistic / wanting to hear me. Left still HUGE here b/c you are reading this - LEFT is winning ATM :-) Once I saw that connection hardcore obvious, i knew that I was going to have to tell this story / concept on youtube to even BE HEARD by Left dominant people. 1 side over other isn't the key - key is the com between 2 :-)
JasonLanganVideo 2 months ago
Anyone else out there who can do this? Till about a month ago I wished... stress pop later I can do this easy now. Yes I found him googling myself way back (lol) but couldn't relate... now I can. WAY hard to describe - very real and I'm explaining with science, just not sure who to tell :-)
JasonLanganVideo 2 months ago
Ron Jeremy twin? :O
crapthatass88 2 months ago
Eh... intelligence or smartness is relevant to an individual. INTPs, INTJs (MBTI reference) are brilliant different. I may be more intelligent in my way than he is in his way. Same with everyone. Hail the INTJ forever!
AspiringCommentor 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if your so smart why are you working in a bar? what do you know of a rodin coil?
crafter2u 2 months ago
I don't understand much about Langan's CTMU, because - let's face us - most of us seem downright chicle-brained compared to somebody in the IQ stratosphere. Still, in a few decades, the children of the elite will all have Langan level IQ's due to genetic-tinkering. Imagine the wealth disparity when the "average" worker has to compete with someone who earned their Bachelor's before they hit puberty.
CottonPoisonwood 3 months ago
@CottonPoisonwood Sounds like the recipe for a revolution. But if it did come to that many would revolt not to crush the elite but to join them. I for one would love a bit of genetic tampering on my part so I can experience the essence of genius, if only in part.
Standuble 2 months ago
@Standuble I'm pretty sure I just found out that genius is more about Right Brain access from the Left ---- no need to tamper with the genetics from my theory, just pop the right "membrane?" in the brain to allow the faster blood flow. A-B Difference. I'm working on video to break it all down. I figured out WAY too much too fast, now I convert that back to language LOL ;-)
JasonLanganVideo 2 months ago
Comment removed
Standuble 2 months ago
@porkyminch01: Mercy me, the logic-crushing power of hyperbole. On the other hand, people are getting taller. I think we can probably chock that one up to better nutrition rather than the "all-consuming" virility of black manhood. Dat ain't no shit, ya'll. Muhfuggahs.
CottonPoisonwood 3 months ago
@porkyminch01 : Short men are facing extinction? Somebody better tell the PRC and Mexico about this, PRONTO!
CottonPoisonwood 3 months ago
I can fap to this.
Desd3n0va 3 months ago
@Desd3n0va I only want to watch b/c I'm curious... response video? LOL ;-)
JasonLanganVideo 2 months ago
Chris, why don't you contribute to science?
Bionuker 3 months ago
Not only did Langan create the CTMU, he also cobbled together the "Original Recipe" from leptons, bubble-gum, and the rusty spring in an old Pez Dispenser. THEN, he built a time-machine, which he promptly used to deliver said formula to one Harland "Colonel" Sanders. Say "Thank You", America.
CottonPoisonwood 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I say, give this guy credit when credit's due- he beat the odds. You gotta love an underdog
souseman 3 months ago
I say, give this guy credit when credit's due- he beat the odds. You gotta love an
underdog
souseman 3 months ago
Holy fuck, who'd think this story would be sad.
educassiano 3 months ago
This man can't be intelligent, he takes himself too seriously..
simplycomplicated333 3 months ago
@simplycomplicated333 If you're above average, you either get on Comedy Central and do this with a smile or you try to slow down for slower people. You are a slow person, try to guess WHY he is brilliant. You won't. You're too slow to understand, I'm sorry :-P
JasonLanganVideo 2 months ago
@JasonLanganVideo loll...I'm definitely not the smartest out there. But Langan is no more relevant to the world than a kid flipping burgers at McDonalds. He postures like he's king of the world. He's this super genius with 0 accomplishments to back up his high scores on a test which he took several times. You wanna see genius. Go to TED.com. Those are geniuses. These "above average" people managed to out smart this guy in every way with their TRUE genius. Keep nuthugging :-P
simplycomplicated333 2 months ago
@simplycomplicated333 I'm ALWAYS going to appreciate anything besides a DERRR response - you did that so I thank you :-) I will look into that for sure. A point that I can easily see having "popped" into being able to relate to this (past just wishing I got this) - was seeing the god awful social differences that occur from that POV. Knowing where to start working your way out when no one shows you - that's hard to figure out...
JasonLanganVideo 2 months ago
@JasonLanganVideo - I try not to reply with the standard youtube troll fest.
You'll love that website, I'm sure of it because if THIS guy can wow you, then the presenters on those video's will knock you on your ass with their ideas. ;)
simplycomplicated333 2 months ago
@simplycomplicated333 hes written the CTMU. Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe. You dumbass.
aaronvespro 2 months ago
@simplycomplicated333 very objective
darkunorthodox 1 month ago
1:30
De22Lano 3 months ago
age of 3 or 4?? he doesn't know? lol
gr8vibes2 3 months ago
How the fuck does he work in a BAR? If he is the smartest man alive, why doesn't he make some good research or why does nasa or the pentagon hide him somewhere and make him work on some army stuff? There are so many contradictions regarding this dude...
VikingNightmare 3 months ago
@VikingNightmare Because he is an American. Any American can do what (s)he likes.
Invesigator 3 months ago
@Invesigator i can eat an AMERICAN alphabet soup and shit a better argument...
any american can do what he/she likes and of course suffer the necessary consequences, like living in a broke and falling apart state, and by your definition america is an anarchist state... we stupid europeans always knew america is full of savages
VikingNightmare 3 months ago
ill tell you who the real smartest man is ... STEVEN HAWKINS albert instein was but hes dead so steven hawkins the smartest man alive
phillips4174 3 months ago
i just want to punch this faggot in the face lololol
jklman426 3 months ago
304 people dislike like the fact that Darwin's IQ was way down in the toilet.
chris7777777777777 3 months ago
Look, look. We may have our differences in terms of our point of view on Langan, but we all know that he would pwn Hawking in an arm-wrestling tournament.
Grawpify 3 months ago
Comment removed
KatFromMars 4 months ago
Comment removed
mena88 4 months ago
@KatFromMars 180*
highest iq is 210 by some asian
DmonkeyD1994 3 months ago
@KatFromMars That was on an a mental age scale. That type tends to inflate the actual score.
Preeminence21 3 months ago
@Preeminence21 >.< omg ppl, I got it now ok? chill out, 5 people have wrote the same to me D: srs, I dont even care.
KatFromMars 3 months ago
I don't really think you can qualify everything through binary.
ThisOneIsTaken 4 months ago
I am a lightweight compared to this guy, and here are my first impressions: 1) he thinks like Spinoza, that is good; 2) he thinks like Plato, that is both good and extremely scary.
This guy's ideas are going to take up my time for awhile.
lebarosky 4 months ago
People like this should be running the world not these celebrities like obama.
shamelessfootfucker 4 months ago 6
@shamelessfootfucker The problem is, if the world were finally made a good place (in so far as mankind wasn't adding problems to problems that naturally exist), about half the people would think it was a bad place (for dumb reasons).
ion010101 3 months ago
@shamelessfootfucker Obama, a Harvard graduate, is stupid?
You Americans don't know what good you have.
Obama is not horrible. Americans are horrible.
iAnnouska 2 months ago