Added: 3 years ago
From: xXxSkinhead69xXx
Views: 84,658
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (112)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Real Skins aren't red faggots, youre a brown faggot, cause you one of the little fbastards who have stolen the Real Skin Style! Fuck you!

  • Skinheads are faggots =)

  • FUCK OFF BONEHEADS!!

  • @waxmuth 14/88 red faggot.

  • Rum trinken oder rumtrinken?

  • It's not same skinheads we are all thinking of.

  • Muy buenos en directo!!!!

  • S.H.A.R.P.

  • das waren noch zeiten...

  • this song sux bitch

  • Good luck Buster with operation , they say it is touch and go but you will pull through it , best wishes from all your skinhead followers oi! oi!

  • i love this song!

  • first heard this in German years ago at a skinhead gig ..brings back a few memorys,,,thanks for the posting

  • pretty hard to find a good vid without the hot topic of whether skinheads are all racists and shite eh?. i wish everyone would get educated -__-

  • skinhead girl, skinhead girl, I can´t stop to sing this song

  • look i am not threatened by anyones beliefs just ons by ignorant yanks on youtube who seem to think that they have a supperior judgement and a final say in a matter. work pants WTF speak ENGLISH douchebag if a bloke were about in pants he'd look like a right numpty >< and personally i think you overooked what i said and secondly i didnt aim my comnt to u it was an overall expression and therefore i understand being that you have taken your time to directly comment me your the one whos threatened

  • i wish all u fags would stop debating wether just due to a label u kan classify their politikal and social beliefs in my opinion skinhead aint about being a nazi, anti fascist nor anyother of your poxy labels i believe being a skinhead is simply being forthright about your beliefs and being loyal to yourself and your opinions etc im '' working class'', i was also brought up by a family of what ppl may kall skinheads, i am a nationalist, i am english but most of all i am PROUD soo stfu or fuk off

  • @english0not0british My, aren't you the angry one. And you haven't taken the time to understand my point: that there is a great deal of gray area when trying to define someone or any social group. I'm simply trying to explain to another poster why there is so much confusion over the terms given the people with little or no hair: where some of the stereotypes (right or wrong) come from and that they've changed over time. Please rethink your post as you must feel very threatened by others' ideas.

  • can someone explain to me why nazi's are called skinheads if they are not racist like nazis? Not showing attitude honestly just wanna look into this.

  • @TheShrubbygamertag The Skinhead/Nazi confusion is an easy one to make, given similar fashion style, crossover music and geographical location: Germany, the UK, and so forth. The polished look of skins comes from working class backgrounds (boots, work pants like Dickies, braces, etc.) and it was the working class which Hitler appealed to in order to eventually consolidate power. Germany was reeling from the debt imposed after WWI, and it was easy to sway worker's opinions by...

  • @TheShrubbygamertag ... blaming others for people not being able to put food on the table. The Nazi youth were noted for their regimented look: the angular, Aryan ideal, ready to work for a bright future. I've heard the shaved heads of Euro skins come from problems while working in early industrial factories, but there are likely other factors as well. Punk and ska music certainly appealed to both sides, expressing rage at the establishment, or the fun of a few drinks at the pub.

  • @TheShrubbygamertag The words 'skinhead' and Nazi have become interchangeable over time. A fascist band may use the word skin to describe a racist, while another may be referring to anti-racist, working class idealism. Also, the significance of the colors one wears (red, blue, white, black) on their shoes and braces has different meanings depending on local custom. The best way to go is to tread lightly, and every 'skin', racist or not, will show their colors, so to speak, soon enough.

  • nazi facist wannabe skins are the muck on my shoes,, sharp is the true skin,, so jog on ,nazi,, we beat you in two wars and are still beating ya,, god bless two tone ,xxxxxxxxx got us all together xxx

  • Trad skins smash racists, because Ska unites the tribes, not divides them.

  • Saw this bad with my dad and two freinds recently at the house of blues in CA Hollywood BLV. ...Got mooned by buster... :)

  • Original Skinhead!!! :D

  • saw em live the other week fuckin brilliant!

  • im a skin head girl oi oi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Skinheads will survive! Ska music, Oi! music, doc martens/solovaire, Flight jackets, sheepskins, and working class! oi!

    oh, and not to mention the few girls are just perfexct!

  • @Skarebel69 I'm 16, I'm more of a punk but I have 6 mates just in Manchester who are around my age who are Skins. It's definitely surviving mate don't worry :')

  • @PopInTheClouds I started as a punk and just kind of transitioned into a skin. Met some of the best people of my life who I'm still friends with to this day - can't complain like!

  • real skins aren't racist!

  • @bettyrose420

    Nice one mixing politic's and music.

    Brainwashed twat.

    All hail комисса́р bettyrose 420.

  • i would love a skinhead girl :D

  • aHHHHHh memories of bomer jackest Doc MaRtins, perry shirts, fringe hair doos n scooters rallys<3 ska'D 4 Lyfe.

  • ska skinheads Oi!

    to every skinhead in the wolrd don´t forget your roots

  • I wouldn't marry a girl that is Busters size and weight

  • why are you all so pissed..buster wasnt racist...skrewdriver were tho..take it from a real skin ;)

  • que buena canción

  • @zionist123 I'm a skin and have jewish skinhead friends, its only boneheads who would give you any trouble, real skins only care about 3 things working class pride, music and good times

  • @JAKEWORLEY

    Amen to that brother

  • @JAKEWORLEY

    FINALLY someone understands!

  • @JAKEWORLEY more people need to be fricken educated about this!

  • @JAKEWORLEY so your english? like... and your a skin?? if so thats fuckin mint!!! i wish i had skin friends! :D

  • @JAKEWORLEY Well said at least someone on here has the right idea of being a skinhead i started being a skin in 1987 and married a skingirl once a skinhead always a skinhead

  • @JAKEWORLEY Actually 4 things....You forgot the beer! Cheerz:)

  • @JAKEWORLEY 'real skins' Lmfao. Fuck off with your kike mates you SHARP prick.

  • ska!!

    

  • abd the fact that i'm a nationalist doesn't stop me from respecting people that think differently. In my sense everibody's free. call it freedom of thought. antifas don't like that, they'll gang up and try to beat up skinheads who arent politicaly "clear" (back here in france, antifa can attack you even if you are apolitic, just for not being totally on their side). the skinhead movement was a rebel movement but those people are just trying to make it politically correct and mainstream

  • @gorfaf88 Fascism and National Socialism are quite different as well. but both are basically cousins of communism in "ideology" if you wish to call it that. no matter what view point you have it'll lead to slavery. whether they speak the truth or not doesn't matter, the real truth is you will be a slave. an antifa came about because communists believed fascists should be treated on the same level they treat others. SA are a good example, thuggery. nazis do the same.

  • @OiSkinnHead69 i don't think you are right but of course each one has his opinion. I think fascism is better than democracy, because democracy is based on the alternative and changeable rulling of ignorant masses of people, who have no long reached view. Thus they are easelly fooled by politicians who only want to profit from power. On the contrary i think that a chief, chosen for his qualityes, is a much more efficient governement.

  • @gorfaf88 just like your 1 leader system who lies to the people. hitler lied, said he was winning the war when he was losing it , i know my mom's side lived through it. an even were forced to serve. this way of "ruling" is flawed. socialism/communism are flaws. they do not work. if you tax the rich and give to the poor you stunt your society of wealth , while promoting growth of the lower classes thus creating poverty and not enough work.

  • @OiSkinnHead69 socialism is cutting everyone's health and aligning it on the poorest level. It is perverse and contrary to nature. I support N.S., as the least shitty system i can think of, but i don't glorify it as the perfect or even "good" system. Just one that works a little better, and scare the comunists ant capitalists so shitless they had to unite to destroy it.

  • @gorfaf88 National "socialism" they are socialists economically. what are you talking about? thats why they're called "right wing" because they're the right wing of communism. an communism is the far left, and anarchy is the very far right. NS is probably equal to communism. no they destroyed it because they declared war on every nation in Europe an were seeking world domination, an so forth.nationalism to the extreme.anything "extreme" isn't good.

  • @OiSkinnHead69 sorry man, you can actually look it up. The other old social democraties, declared war on Germany which was trying to unite her cultural people. hitler never stopped seeking peace with the west, and never inteded to conquer the world. He wrote it down in Mein Kampf, world domination by one culture (even US) is impossible

  • @gorfaf88 no they declared war on Germany because they were told to leave their own NATION! i think you would boycott all German goods if you were being thrown out of your homeland...oh bullshit he was seeking peace because he was getting his ass whooped. russians compromise of 160 ethnicities not just slavs. an its "German Race" not "Germanic" thats changing what they said.

  • @OiSkinnHead69 Hitler was seeking peace bacause he was a good strategist and knew well he could only get himself in deep shit if the others united. He was a tacticall genius, almost won the war against two of te worl's super powers, but lost because of the italian defeat in Greece (he had to help them due to their mutual aassistance traty, and that prevented him to defeat the russians before winter). rudolf Hess was actually an peace emissary, that's why he jumped over great britain.

  • @gorfaf88 right a strategical genius who couldn't control his emotions and lost the war because of terror bombings. an he did this because the british bombed berlin.i wouldn't say "almost" an i wouldn't say hes a "genius" because for one he split his forces up several times. first on different fronts then in russia again when fighting for stalingrade an when he went to get other resources like oil. he didn't "almost" win. oh blame the italians..lol...hess said hitler was crazy.

  • @OiSkinnHead69 I studied that war since i was ten. i red all possible books about it, wether they were written by specialists, jews, americans, russians, german, etc... The principal and undeniable fact is that Hitler was a strategic and tactical genius, as Napoleon. forget the clichés. A genius can loose if he is isolated and outnumbered, or for a great number of facts (Général Lee, Napoleon, Alexander, Bolivar, Etc)

  • @OiSkinnHead69 okay i assume my name will attract a lot of criticism, himmler too said that hitler was a madman. and stofembourger (that is spelled so wrong) attempted to assasinate hitler not to liberate the state but because he saw hitler as an obstacle rather than an asset.

  • @gorfaf88 well your idea of "democracy" an what not an having "rights" is non existant in a fascist,nazi/national socialist, or communist government. you have no rights because you forfeited them all to your dictator who you trust to make the right decisions for you, which in the end doesn't lead to what is good for you but what is good for them, which they will lie an say its "helping" everyone else. self sacrifice with no input back to you. nazis,fascists,communists are same shit. thugs.

  • @OiSkinnHead69 i don't agree, but again you are free of thinking what you want. Fascism is often compared to communism, but that's easy and stupid. The fact is that fascism is an mix of socialism (return to peoples will, adaptation and rapid changes when the situation needs it, contrary to conservatism) and nationalism/patriotism, with the ancient Roman idea of citizen. The fact that we choose to be rullen by a chief is to make things better to sort out and more effective leadership.

  • @gorfaf88 lol...good luck. i don't trust one person with my rights and freedoms. wouldn't work. but as you said you have rights to think how you wish, however, that will end when someone tells you, your way of thinking isn't correct and you're killed for it. just like stalin did.

  • @OiSkinnHead69 you're right. But this happens often in so called democracy. I hate hypocrisy. I prefer to live in a francly dictature and watch my tongue (and discover that it isn't that terrible after all), than live in a kafkaian, insane "liberty" system, which is as relgious and intolerant as any totalitarism. We have to assume that whatever the societ, people who speak against the majority are never liked.. noeone will ever change that.

  • @gorfaf88 perhaps religion is intolerant towards immoral things such as homosexuality, but atleast it has values,morals and such. if you rather live your life being told what to do, ok, we can test that out by sending you out to go die in the iraq war even though you have nothing to gain from it or any logical reason to. an that is religion you can't confuse religion with democracy. you have a freedom to say as you wish, but you don't have to listen to it. do what you want.

  • @OiSkinnHead69 I support the idea of fascism because fascist societies "work". Italia under mussolini, germany under hitler, or argentina under Peron where, whatever you can say, productive, rich and healthy countries, with a high standart of life, no unemployment, artistic rising, cultural rebirth, social peace. Opposite: EVERY time the communists won a country, it was destroyed, the people opprimed, no food, penury. EVERY single time

    xcuse my limited language but i'm french.

  • @gorfaf88 you think it was a high standard of life? lol you are very misslead. my mom had family that were rich, an they were forced to help other people by giving them what they had, in this sense they are stealing from people who had to work hard to create that, an its being given to people who don't want to work hard or do anything for themselves. National socialism failed just like your comparison to rome. people mixed an are no longer "pure" 50% of germany is actually has r1b gene.

  • @OiSkinnHead69 family on my mom's side are germans from the east (immigrated to US after the war). they were traditionnaly peasants from oriental prussia. Since the time of the Kronprintz they wer living as slaves. NS government boosted the industry, but mainained an equilibrium against complete liberalism and capitalism. I have no doubt people soffered from NS, but i studied the state of german economics during 33-42, and the standart of living is truly unbelievable.

  • @gorfaf88 yeah for the people who were poor yes. for the people with money no. in the end it destroyed businesses. an they would of went down the same path as the communists and would of fallen apart. socialism doesn't work. as we agreed upon earlier. an NS is socialism. its in the name as well. and "liberalism" would refer to a conservative, depending on how you use the word, if you said "liberal" you're talking about a democrat...maybe anarchist opposite of totalitarianism.

  • @gorfaf88 in hitlers process of world rule he destroyed his own people in the process. Fascist and National socialist governments are all based around a statistic government just like communism. and socialism its self is a cousin,so to say, of communism. and basically the same in nature. i've lost a great great cousin who was 5 because he commited a "political" offense when he was just a boy because he didn't salute hitler an not knowing even to do so. an was killed. that was justified?

  • @OiSkinnHead69 i'm sorry to say that i don't believe you. i've heard thousands of people explain facts like "my grandmother was eaten alive by nazis" or stuff like that, but it is usally false. Because assuming Hitler was a dictator, he couldn't rule people by terror. That's what the communists did, and it was counter productive. When you study facts closely, you see that in the third reich, a single execution was a very complicated process, involving tribunals, rapports, police etc...

  • @gorfaf88 oh of course he couldn't,you don't have to believe me i could show you photos of my family if you wanted to i have tons. whether you believe me or not isn't the issue, its a fact. my family lost everything because of Hitler and his greed. hardly complicated. you throw them in a truck you take em out and you shoot them.not very complicated. ever wonder why Rommel was the only general allowed back into europe remaining as a hero...hmm figure it out. he lost the war because of many things

  • @gorfaf88 closest thing i can compare rome to is a constitutional monarchy with no restrictions on the Leader.

  • @OiSkinnHead69 you are right if you speak of imperial Rome, but Rome was also a republic. I tend to base my model of an "ideal" system on the French napoleonic empires. But it only means i think of them as good basis, not perfect exemple. i wonder if a "perfect" human system is possible. Sometimes i don't think so. What i know is that some things (art, culture, traditions, nature) are worth fighting for. till death, because they are much greater than any human life.

  • @gorfaf88 well the Bonaparte empire was very much like communist russia and National socialist Germany, if you do not know of the SA an such behaving as thugs.but as i've said it isn't justified either way you look at it. nothing will ever be "perfect" that is a dream it isn't tangible nor possible. human error will always corrupt the idea,so no ideology or way of thinking would work. just like religion non are close to the truth, but they teach values and morals.

  • @gorfaf88 You know that in Germany under Hitler the people earn almost nothing with their work? "Everyone has work" is just something that the Nazis always use as an argument, but its wrong. Lots of people where exploited and used as cheap workers just like in other systems, but the difference is: they couldnt do anything against it.

  • @enoschadz sorry man, you're talking to me about the communist system. Germany was so rich and well tended, that when the soviet army invaded it in 44 45, (an army composed of poor colective peasants and mongol tribes), total devastation and pillage was permitted and recommended to erase the success of national socialism. French, arabes, englishmen who went to Germany under hitler were baffled and wanted to import this system. After it depends on the angle you look at it.

  • @gorfaf88 well when Hitler allied with communists the communists said for anyone to fight against it would be doing wrong, thats saying something...(yeah that its as fucked up as communism) ...socialism doesn't work seriously look at it man, europe is socialist. it has a low GDP compared to the US or atleast did before we got a communist for a "president", but either way they did at the time before they realized how fucked up it is when the war came knocking on their door.

  • @gorfaf88 well... "iraq" war in the sense of fighting terrorists. chances are you wouldn't go die for no reason.

  • @enoschadz an fascism is no different. he also got rid of the social classes in society.(poor,right,middle classes)

  • @FoolMentalJane No. It could be politic, but not nessecary far-left. Remember for example the spanish Civil War. The antifa zone, at the begining was anarchist and communist, but then it was only democratic (and they were of right too). I have a political opinion, but for me antifa is the same that antirracist because the fascist are racist. (Excuse me if something is bad writted, because i'm not english and i don't know if it's good writed or not :) )

  • @ColtellPPCC not necessarily. fascists and nazis aren't "racists" but i'd say klan are. people can use a name and symbols and make it out to be something its not just like stalin did with "communism" an many other dictators. (i don't support nazis,fascists,or communists or anything of that sort, just making a point.)

    antifa is communist no matter how much you try to sugar coat it. its like a white power idiot saying he doesn't hate. lol

  • @OiSkinnHead69 sorry man, i'm a "fascist" but usually people use this term to describe "autoritary or totalistic politics". but fascism isn't quite the same. Whatever, i can only observe tht today the "antifas" are acting more like "fascists" than anyone else. I'm maybe a fascist, but i got apolitic friends, trojan friends, coloured friends, we just respect each other. Abd there is a difference between hating everybody and just defending your race or culture. antifas just hit people...

  • @gorfaf88 who your friends are doesn't matter. fact is, fascism is basically a different version of communism in political opinion, then a communist but the economic and government type is basically equivalent. well you have to consider which people are representing these groups, most likely the uneducated part of society and the very poor. well national socialists (nazis) weren't actually "haters" as portrayed by left wing nuts. but however you wish to look at it neither are good.

  • @OiSkinnHead69 fascism (or national socialism), are a mix of socialism and community/reform attitude (anti conservative) and a sense of belonging to a group (clanic, national, racial etc). Fascism is based on a roman view of politics and a hierarchiesed society, in accordance with sens of merit, and not money. I've been a N.S. for 15 years now, and i feel that my gratest opposition is not against communism or anarchism, but against conservatic, democratic, capitalistic structures.

  • @gorfaf88 fascism and National socialism are quite different. fascism doesn't have that idea of a superior race of people that are "super humans" where as national socialism does, an the belief that every person should serve his nation over himself no matter the cost, an what you have is to be given to another person,an getting rid of the classes. Fascism isn't even roman way of politics because it was a republic like the US and had a "senate" an as you see that doesn't work. look at the US.

  • @OiSkinnHead69 fascism and national socialism are basically the same stuff. But N.S. was of germanic thinking and culture. the doctrina is basically the same. the part about super humans is a cliché, it was just a "racial preservation" program on large scale. but they never were that fanatic about aryan race. We can trace a list of 250 jews who didn't hide their ascendance, and who served high posts in the whermacht. till the end, N.S. is based on the equation: a ethnie=a territory

  • @gorfaf88 Hitler basically considered anyone less than 1/4 jewish Aryan.

    an if they weren't why were they promoting Lebensborne? but just so you know their doctrine excludes your nationality and your own identity,as Degrelle said, "it is the preservation of the GERMAN RACE!" they believe it is only blood that can make you German an because your German you are superior to others. he ignored boundaries every non German person (culture,language etc.) had to convert or die. (lose nationality,etc.)

  • @OiSkinnHead69 German here is used as "germanic" and not german by nationalitie. Francs (the founders of France) were germans. Ase wer slaves (russians) etc

  • @gorfaf88 if he was trying to unite Germany and other "european" nations then ,if he did believe in pan europeanism,why go to Africa, and the middle east? they aren't "european" or Germanic. an Slavs an other "russians" are quite different from the Germans themselves. R1b Gene compared to R1a.

  • @OiSkinnHead69 come on, you never played strtegy games? When you organise a war on great scale, you don't intend to control or colonise the regions you invade. Tou play chess on a world scale. The americans landed in normandy, but you can't say it was to colonise normandy and make it a part of america. Likewise, invasion of France in 40 is a strategicall strike. Hitler wrote it himself "we will never make germans out of the frenc, they are too celtic, too independant".

  • @gorfaf88 but the issue is if you don't occupy it an you don't repress the squalor you will have riots or people creating coups to over throw that form of government. games aren't real strategy. real warfare isn't comparable to a game.

  • @OiSkinnHead69 i'm speaking about far tactical simulation games, the ones you can't have on a computer. you play them on table top. anyway, what i was saying, invading a hostile territory is basic strategy, annexing it to your country is an other manner.

  • Wo kann ich die tabs herbekommen?

    Geiles Lied 5*

  • automation percusion :/

  • Mmmm...:-)

  • Buster die alte Socke....ein geiles Cover

  • @xXxSkinhead69xXx  whats that, buster ate all the pies?

  • @xXxSkinhead69xXx jooooo^^ einfach mal zu sich stehen egal ob dünn dick oder sonstwas darf man da füllige grüße verschicken ? xD

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more