More nonsense from self described "crank" David Berlinski

[Mekelsior]

I do not understand how the evolutionists are unable to take the statements of Berlinski for what they are and not twist it, he did not say that whale evolved from cow, he said lets say it did, it is completely different. Now Darwin said that the whale evolved from Bear, how did he know? He didn`t it is called an educated guess. No one knows anything really it is all an educated guess to fit in a theory among the observations that we see that goes against it. It is 100% a priori evidence.

[SmokiSounds]

lmfao at the pathetic video without any counter-argument. The man states himself that the exmaple of a cow is "crude". Then he suggests imagining a car turning into submarine, naturally. So Darwinschihuaha, you feel embarrassed enough yet? I LAUGH in the face of evolutionists, poor bastards, believeing they came from nothingness without any reason. Might as well kill yourselves in that case. It's hilarious.

[wandp7782]

i do not understand why people do not want to understand that the transformation they claim happened for million of millions of years is not mathematically, logically, practically possible. Dr David in this video is right. go try to turn car into submarine and see if it is possible without intelligence.

[DarwinsChihuahua]

Cars do not reproduce sexually. They do not undergo random mutation and natural selection. It is an invalid analogy.

As for whether evolution is mathematically, logically and practically possible; yes. Yes it is.

David Berlinski is a crackpot and admits as much. He is also willing to say anything as long as there is a paycheck involved. He is really no better than the two-bit psychics and astrologers who are either deluded and/or ignorant trying to mack a buck any way they know how.

[wandp7782]

i was not saying that car is sexually active. that was to give you an idea that what's involved in the prcess of the change that's required. also, if you say it is possible then why don't you prove it by giving testable example.

[DarwinsChihuahua]

Please just google "evolution observed" or something like that. This information is out there. Evolution is a fact. Deal with it.

[wandp7782]

Google it? you do not belive everything on internet is ture, do you? just show me an example where natural selection based on random mutations has repetedely produced more and more things?

[SmokiSounds]

@DarwinsChihuahua Evolution is presented as a fact when it's a lie. Deal with it. 

[SmokiSounds]

@DarwinsChihuahua lol. You're a walking agenda-troll failure, chihuahua. And you know it, which saves me time explaining why. You know perfectly well that you didn't come from nothingness, that you didn't come from a soup of chemicals, you understand perfectly well that the possibilities of life appearing from non-life equal impossibility (because it's near impossibility mathematically), yet you're struggling to defend your pathetic evolution. I know why, though. It's ok.

[BigG99]

i think his argument is very good and has a great point... refute it?

[TheHatefulDead]

"(H)is argument is very good" only if you're trying to "turn a car into a submarine", or "turn a cow into a whale".

But, if we're talking about life evolving...

life adapting and radiating over hundreds, thousands, even millions of generations...

this "argument" becomes nonsense.

The "cow to whale" only looks directional in hindsight.

Cows do not "turn into" whales.

[TheHatefulDead]

This point is not mere semantics over the proper ancestry of whales.

Rather, it addresses a complete misunderstanding of the scale and mechanisms of evolution.

[BigG99]

your missing the point of his argument... he is bringing to light the total incomprehensible belief that things of such complexity can evolve.... no amount of time or gradule processes can account for it. its a very good argument!

[TheHatefulDead]

You are missing the point.

Regardless of how incomprehensible to you it is, complexity can and DOES evolve.

And not only in biological systems.

No army of strawmen armed with smoke and mirrors will change this reality.

The argument from incredulity is a very bad argument!

[BigG99]

evolution is not a fact as you would like to assume it is... so thus your comment is void of reality.  evolutionists THINK we evolved and non evolutionists dont THINK we evolved.. our argument is simply stronger.

[SpeakerForrTheDead]

Wrong

[SpeakerForrTheDead]

"our argument is simply..." nonsense.

Evolution is a fact.

Most people on Death Row have been convicted on less evidence.

[BigG99]

well said lol... wrong..... ooo feel the weight of that one lol......silly person

[SpeakerForrTheDead]

Do you also feel the weight of an oppressive mythology preventing you from facing life logically, realistically, and on its own terms?

[BigG99]

actually i was a non christian for 15 years of my life, i grew up in a non religious home. i have been on both sides of the fence.... your the only one living in a fantasy... your religion is more extreme then mine will ever be.

[SpeakerForrTheDead]

you win

[BigG99]

great im glad you recognise that :)

[SpeakerForrTheDead]

What I recognize is the futility of discussing anything with someone who knows the conclusion to be drawn...

without even knowing the evidence.

What I recognize is that someone who will not even acknowledge the operational differences between science and religion, let alone understand what they are, is apt to go on forever with a slew of "I know you are, what am I" retorts.

And, ultimately, I just don't care what nonsense you believe.

[SpeakerForrTheDead]

Day is day, night is night.

Up is up and down is down.

[SpeakerForrTheDead]

Snakes (and donkeys) do not talk, bats are not birds, insects do not have 4 legs, virgins do not give birth, rabbits are not ruminants,

[SpeakerForrTheDead]

the Sun does not go 'round the Earth, the Earth is not flat, and a man cannot live days inside the gastrointestinal tract of a fish.

[SpeakerForrTheDead]

And, oh yeah...

Life evolves.

Deal with it.

[wandp7782]

not the way darwinist or neo-darwinist say. it evolves but in totally different context.

[nodvick]

hardly ever done? this guy is very ill-informed.. plus his red herring of a cow turning into a whale. modern whales and modern cows ARE EQUALLY AS EVOLVED, they are both MODERN creatures. -.-