@fascistcat About Reagan...He compared the Taliban to America's Founding Fathers and hosted them at the White House. As for supplying terrorists and training them- it was in an effort to combat Soviets and pretty common knowledge. Also what do you consider Iran Contra?
When are you idiots going to realize that your teachers and professors are just a bunch of Liberal hacks who don't know anything about America or economics? Nothing you said to Gingrich was historically accurate.
Your teachers wish that you had been aborted, to 'Save the Planet.' O'bamas terrorist pals said that 25% of the US population would have to be exterminated if they ever succeeded in getting Socialism/Communism implemented here.
@fascistcat Maybe you're right...Then again, maybe I've read the official reports from each event I cited and just maybe the reports say exactly what I said- you can find links to them on my website in the description of the video. Enjoy the read.
@pan488 Let's take your big 3 points one at a time.
1) Subprime - Fannie and Freddie were playgrounds for lawless Libs. Jamie Gorelick is the nexus of all the recent ailments are nation has suffered. Bush tried to reign them in, but failed.
2)S&L - The Libs changed depreciation rates for commercial real estate and destroyed 15% of market value overnight.
3)BP - MMS Libs were onboard and approved removing drilling fluid before setting concrete plug. Predictable outcome.
@fascistcat 1) Subprime: Gramm-Leach-Bliley allowed merger of commercial and investment banks- GOP Congress. Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 that repealed statutory prohibitions on interstate banking, and the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000- Bush era- deregulated derivatives
2) S&L: Reagan deregulated S&L's and they gave out loans carelessly. DIDMCA= Dereulation. FDIC[dot]gov/bank/historical/s&l/
@pan488 Regarding #2: I actually wasted my time reading this only link of yours that worked. I knew in advance that it would be some Liberal pap, and I wasn't disappointed.
There is not one mention of The Tax Reform Act of 1986 which eliminated accelerated depreciation and wiped out the value of commercial holdings, along with the on-paper liquidity of the S&Ls.
This paper was written by Libs for Libs."In the 1980s, a 'go-go' mentality prevailed..." p187
@fascistcat FDIC[dot]gov/bank/historical/s&l/ and description links are liberal sources? I sent you the official report from the investigation on fdic[dot]gov... your bill isn't in there? Well maybe that's because your history is wrong. FDIC[dot]gov is a liberal source lmfao. Dunno why the other links didnt work-they work for me: link to pdf files
@pan488 Reports1: There are 10's of thousands of government reports written every year. That's how the bureaucrats justify their existence. For the most part, nobody reads them. The 'solution' is always "More government."
The report you linked to had countless regulations listed that were ostensibly in response to the S&Ls being "deregulated." Somehow theses regulations aren't considered "regulations' and also didn't solve the problems of the so-called "de-regulation." (cont)
@pan488 Reports2: This report was just a Leftist hit on Reagan. Bureaucrats are Leftists. Notice the constant reference to "The 80's" That's code for, "The Decade of Greed."
A chart within the paper showed the shift to commercial loans, although they don't report/understand it. That was the killer. When the Dems "soaked the rich" in '86, the loans dragged down the system.
Liberals protect Liberals.The 9/11 Report never blamed the Gorelick Wall.for the Intelligence failure.
@fascistcat Yes its a conspiracy: Liberal new world order.By the way, if reports solutions say more regulation all the time: maybe you're just a paranoid and obviously wrong. If colleges teach a "liberal version" of history and government reports back it up, maybe you're just wrong. I have the FDIC investigation report up in the description and a timeline. Perhaps the timeline confused you.
@pan488 Conspiracy1: I wasted more time doing your research for you. I consider these "billable hours."
The first oddity that I noticed in your linked pdf was that it seemed 'book-ish' rather than a govt report. That's because it IS a chapter from a book written by a Marxist Labor Law professor named Marc Linder.
He evidently has a number of 'books' that approach economics from a Marxist position. I'm guessing that one of your professors gave you the link in the first place.
@fascistcat lol? My link is a study prepared by the FDIC’s Division of Research and Statistics from FDIC[dot]gov. You gotta do more research- No more conspiracy theories.
@pan488 Your link is to a 'book' published by the FDIC. How or why? I don't care.
Check ' findbookprices(DOT)com ' and enter his name " Marc Linder " to see a list of other books written by him. Or, just google ' Marc Linder Iowa Marx '
He has another 'book' published by NationalAgLawCenter through The University of Arkansas.
He worked at neither the FDIC or UofArk. Basically, other Libs liked his work and published them. I'm not buying it to find the acknowledgements.
@fascistcat Uh, ctrl+F "Marc Linder" ...what are you on about? The Link "History of the Eighties" is a report by the FDIC. Mark Linder does not appear on any of the pages. So yeah, no.
@pan488 You-a-culpa1: Ok, I have no idea why that Marxists is being called the author on various sites, but here is a link to the entire text..
[(ht tp: //ww w. allthingsnow. com /day/services/shared/6884268/FDIC-History-of-the-Eighties-Lessons-for-the-Future ) note gaps]
Where you had a link to Ch4, you should probably read Ch3 where they at least mention the effect of the '86 increase on commercial real estate. They still don't seem to understand the impact of the change (cont)
@pan488 You-a-culpa2:Coming out of the Carter Depression the S&Ls were teetering, the FSLIC was being depleted and the industry was losing 4B a year. So the govt reduced capital requirements for FSLIC coverage.
The problem was insured deposits. Have you ever asked a bank about their lending practices before depositing money? The removal of confiscatory taxes allowed the boon and the re-institution of them caused the crash.
Most economic downturns are the result of government.
@fascistcat "The regulatory lessons of the S&L disaster are many. First and foremost is the need for strong and effective supervision of insured depository institutions, particularly if they are given new or expanded powers or are experiencing rapid growth."
His name appears nowhere in any of the texts, the FDIC's Division of Research and Statistics wrote the report. "Teetering under Carter" yes and Reagan caused a meltdown through deregulation. It began in '84.
@fascistcat "The regulatory lessons of the S&L disaster are many. First and foremost is the need for strong and effective supervision of insured depository institutions, particularly if they are given new or expanded powers or are experiencing rapid growth."
His name appears nowhere in any of the texts, the FDIC's Division of Research and Statistics wrote the report. "Teetering under Carter" yes and Reagan caused a meltdown through deregulation. It began in 1984.
@fascistcat The regulatory lessons of the S&L disaster are many. First and foremost is the need for strong and effective supervision of insured depository institutions, particularly if they are given new or expanded powers or are experiencing rapid growth
His name appears nowhere in any of the texts, the FDIC's Division of Research and Statistics wrote the report. "Teetering under Carter" yes and Reagan caused a meltdown through deregulation. It began in 1984.
@fascistcat "The regulatory lessons of the S&L disaster are many. First and foremost is the need for strong and effective supervision of insured depository institutions, particularly if they are given new or expanded powers or are experiencing rapid growth."
His name appears nowhere in any of the texts, the FDIC's Division of Research and Statistics wrote the report. "Teetering under Carter" yes and Reagan caused a meltdown through deregulation. It began in 1984.
@pan488 I would be shocked if government regulators didn't support more regulations. To claim that there was Deregulation in the first place is a canard. There was tons of ineffectual and stupid regulation on the books.
Prior to the 86 tax increase you could own an apartment building with 100k positive cash flow and pocket the money tax free while having a loss on paper. You'd eventually recapture at sale, but by then you would have improved the property for additional profit.
@pan488 Conspiracy2: There is no need for a conspiracy. It's all out in the open.
Your Marxist professors train little marxists to burrow into the unelected bureaucracy and wreak havoc while promoting other marxists publications through misuse of govt funds.
The Carter administration was buying 'Rules for Radicals' in bulk and shipping copies out to the inner cities to train 'Community Organizers.'
A conspiracy is secret, you f@cks are something else.
Ron Paul is also a vote for the same failed policies of the last 30 yrs.....All the Republicans running are really. He's a little different bc of his policies on drugs and international relations, but really when you break it down, he's a racist, he's an isolationist, and in regards to this video: he's a fan of trickle-down laissez-faire economics. In other words, Ron Paul would do as much if not more damage than Gingrich.
Newt has small ideas, the only one with substance is Ron Paul. Anyone else is simply a vote to continue the same failed policies of the last 20 years.
@fascistcat About Reagan...He compared the Taliban to America's Founding Fathers and hosted them at the White House. As for supplying terrorists and training them- it was in an effort to combat Soviets and pretty common knowledge. Also what do you consider Iran Contra?
pan488 2 weeks ago
When are you idiots going to realize that your teachers and professors are just a bunch of Liberal hacks who don't know anything about America or economics? Nothing you said to Gingrich was historically accurate.
Your teachers wish that you had been aborted, to 'Save the Planet.' O'bamas terrorist pals said that 25% of the US population would have to be exterminated if they ever succeeded in getting Socialism/Communism implemented here.
Your professors share their goals (85%).
fascistcat 2 weeks ago
@fascistcat Maybe you're right...Then again, maybe I've read the official reports from each event I cited and just maybe the reports say exactly what I said- you can find links to them on my website in the description of the video. Enjoy the read.
pan488 2 weeks ago
@pan488 Let's take your big 3 points one at a time.
1) Subprime - Fannie and Freddie were playgrounds for lawless Libs. Jamie Gorelick is the nexus of all the recent ailments are nation has suffered. Bush tried to reign them in, but failed.
2)S&L - The Libs changed depreciation rates for commercial real estate and destroyed 15% of market value overnight.
3)BP - MMS Libs were onboard and approved removing drilling fluid before setting concrete plug. Predictable outcome.
fascistcat 2 weeks ago
@fascistcat 1) Subprime: Gramm-Leach-Bliley allowed merger of commercial and investment banks- GOP Congress. Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 that repealed statutory prohibitions on interstate banking, and the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000- Bush era- deregulated derivatives
2) S&L: Reagan deregulated S&L's and they gave out loans carelessly. DIDMCA= Dereulation. FDIC[dot]gov/bank/historical/s&l/
3) BP) ch 8
All in the reports-read em
pan488 2 weeks ago
@pan488 Regarding #2: I actually wasted my time reading this only link of yours that worked. I knew in advance that it would be some Liberal pap, and I wasn't disappointed.
There is not one mention of The Tax Reform Act of 1986 which eliminated accelerated depreciation and wiped out the value of commercial holdings, along with the on-paper liquidity of the S&Ls.
This paper was written by Libs for Libs."In the 1980s, a 'go-go' mentality prevailed..." p187
Pathetic.
fascistcat 2 weeks ago
@fascistcat FDIC[dot]gov/bank/historical/s&l/ and description links are liberal sources? I sent you the official report from the investigation on fdic[dot]gov... your bill isn't in there? Well maybe that's because your history is wrong. FDIC[dot]gov is a liberal source lmfao. Dunno why the other links didnt work-they work for me: link to pdf files
pan488 2 weeks ago
@pan488 Reports1: There are 10's of thousands of government reports written every year. That's how the bureaucrats justify their existence. For the most part, nobody reads them. The 'solution' is always "More government."
The report you linked to had countless regulations listed that were ostensibly in response to the S&Ls being "deregulated." Somehow theses regulations aren't considered "regulations' and also didn't solve the problems of the so-called "de-regulation." (cont)
fascistcat 2 weeks ago
@pan488 Reports2: This report was just a Leftist hit on Reagan. Bureaucrats are Leftists. Notice the constant reference to "The 80's" That's code for, "The Decade of Greed."
A chart within the paper showed the shift to commercial loans, although they don't report/understand it. That was the killer. When the Dems "soaked the rich" in '86, the loans dragged down the system.
Liberals protect Liberals.The 9/11 Report never blamed the Gorelick Wall.for the Intelligence failure.
fascistcat 2 weeks ago
@fascistcat Yes its a conspiracy: Liberal new world order.By the way, if reports solutions say more regulation all the time: maybe you're just a paranoid and obviously wrong. If colleges teach a "liberal version" of history and government reports back it up, maybe you're just wrong. I have the FDIC investigation report up in the description and a timeline. Perhaps the timeline confused you.
pan488 2 weeks ago
@pan488 Conspiracy1: I wasted more time doing your research for you. I consider these "billable hours."
The first oddity that I noticed in your linked pdf was that it seemed 'book-ish' rather than a govt report. That's because it IS a chapter from a book written by a Marxist Labor Law professor named Marc Linder.
He evidently has a number of 'books' that approach economics from a Marxist position. I'm guessing that one of your professors gave you the link in the first place.
fascistcat 2 weeks ago
@fascistcat lol? My link is a study prepared by the FDIC’s Division of Research and Statistics from FDIC[dot]gov. You gotta do more research- No more conspiracy theories.
pan488 2 weeks ago
@pan488 Your link is to a 'book' published by the FDIC. How or why? I don't care.
Check ' findbookprices(DOT)com ' and enter his name " Marc Linder " to see a list of other books written by him. Or, just google ' Marc Linder Iowa Marx '
He has another 'book' published by NationalAgLawCenter through The University of Arkansas.
He worked at neither the FDIC or UofArk. Basically, other Libs liked his work and published them. I'm not buying it to find the acknowledgements.
fascistcat 2 weeks ago
@fascistcat Uh, ctrl+F "Marc Linder" ...what are you on about? The Link "History of the Eighties" is a report by the FDIC. Mark Linder does not appear on any of the pages. So yeah, no.
pan488 2 weeks ago
@pan488 You-a-culpa1: Ok, I have no idea why that Marxists is being called the author on various sites, but here is a link to the entire text..
[(ht tp: //ww w. allthingsnow. com /day/services/shared/6884268/FDIC-History-of-the-Eighties-Lessons-for-the-Future ) note gaps]
Where you had a link to Ch4, you should probably read Ch3 where they at least mention the effect of the '86 increase on commercial real estate. They still don't seem to understand the impact of the change (cont)
fascistcat 2 weeks ago
@pan488 You-a-culpa2:Coming out of the Carter Depression the S&Ls were teetering, the FSLIC was being depleted and the industry was losing 4B a year. So the govt reduced capital requirements for FSLIC coverage.
The problem was insured deposits. Have you ever asked a bank about their lending practices before depositing money? The removal of confiscatory taxes allowed the boon and the re-institution of them caused the crash.
Most economic downturns are the result of government.
fascistcat 2 weeks ago
@fascistcat "The regulatory lessons of the S&L disaster are many. First and foremost is the need for strong and effective supervision of insured depository institutions, particularly if they are given new or expanded powers or are experiencing rapid growth."
His name appears nowhere in any of the texts, the FDIC's Division of Research and Statistics wrote the report. "Teetering under Carter" yes and Reagan caused a meltdown through deregulation. It began in '84.
pan488 2 weeks ago
@fascistcat "The regulatory lessons of the S&L disaster are many. First and foremost is the need for strong and effective supervision of insured depository institutions, particularly if they are given new or expanded powers or are experiencing rapid growth."
His name appears nowhere in any of the texts, the FDIC's Division of Research and Statistics wrote the report. "Teetering under Carter" yes and Reagan caused a meltdown through deregulation. It began in 1984.
pan488 2 weeks ago
@fascistcat The regulatory lessons of the S&L disaster are many. First and foremost is the need for strong and effective supervision of insured depository institutions, particularly if they are given new or expanded powers or are experiencing rapid growth
His name appears nowhere in any of the texts, the FDIC's Division of Research and Statistics wrote the report. "Teetering under Carter" yes and Reagan caused a meltdown through deregulation. It began in 1984.
pan488 2 weeks ago
@fascistcat "The regulatory lessons of the S&L disaster are many. First and foremost is the need for strong and effective supervision of insured depository institutions, particularly if they are given new or expanded powers or are experiencing rapid growth."
His name appears nowhere in any of the texts, the FDIC's Division of Research and Statistics wrote the report. "Teetering under Carter" yes and Reagan caused a meltdown through deregulation. It began in 1984.
pan488 2 weeks ago
@pan488 I would be shocked if government regulators didn't support more regulations. To claim that there was Deregulation in the first place is a canard. There was tons of ineffectual and stupid regulation on the books.
Prior to the 86 tax increase you could own an apartment building with 100k positive cash flow and pocket the money tax free while having a loss on paper. You'd eventually recapture at sale, but by then you would have improved the property for additional profit.
fascistcat 2 weeks ago
@fascistcat The proof is in the pudding: S&L happened when we deregulated the S&L's- 20 years later it happens again when we deregulate the banks.
pan488 2 weeks ago
@pan488 Conspiracy2: There is no need for a conspiracy. It's all out in the open.
Your Marxist professors train little marxists to burrow into the unelected bureaucracy and wreak havoc while promoting other marxists publications through misuse of govt funds.
The Carter administration was buying 'Rules for Radicals' in bulk and shipping copies out to the inner cities to train 'Community Organizers.'
A conspiracy is secret, you f@cks are something else.
fascistcat 2 weeks ago
@fascistcat Actually the links are in the video description.
pan488 2 weeks ago
Ron Paul is also a vote for the same failed policies of the last 30 yrs.....All the Republicans running are really. He's a little different bc of his policies on drugs and international relations, but really when you break it down, he's a racist, he's an isolationist, and in regards to this video: he's a fan of trickle-down laissez-faire economics. In other words, Ron Paul would do as much if not more damage than Gingrich.
pan488 1 month ago
Newt has small ideas, the only one with substance is Ron Paul. Anyone else is simply a vote to continue the same failed policies of the last 20 years.
Enfocomp 1 month ago
Ron Paul 2012 :)
TheMrJinglesWorld 1 month ago