Neil Gaiman at Keplers - Long Question on Originality

[tengyueming]

ohhh myyy god. This is ridiculous.

[elvenvampire1]

I just watched this again, a month later... I wish I could fucking kill this man... he is so fucking annoying. Gaiman must dread QA's like this.

[Biorhythm1234]

Gaiman takes a pile of crap (the question) and gives us gold.

Who says alchemists don't exist?

[Toughnuffet]

Its true, the fellow who asked that question did it very obnoxiously and wasted a lot time, for Gaiman and the audience. However, what Gaiman came to say after that obtuse question proved to be very interesting, so even stupid questions can produce intelligent answers.

[vinylflowersss]

HAHAHA.

[lycheenut]

What a pompous ass. The point was to ask a question not to try and show off. Didn't work either because it was a stupid question.

[generaldom]

Gaiman's face says it all. "Ask the damn question."

[saymawa]

Geez.

Pretentious twat.

[PopeSlyph]

Yeah, and get on that leather jacket

[babyfister]

I did kill myself

[kunoichimarikochan]

I would've killed myself.

[unigolyn]

Wow. "With art being a process of reinterpretation by nature, how do you keep your own art original, and what would you consider your most original work?" That's all the guy said, for a minute and a half.

[FrankieCisco]

This reminds me of that episode of 'I'm from Rolling Stones' where Tika asked JZ how his latest album had changed the face of hip hop, and he said, "You're asking the wrong person." So...sorry for that. I saw a sort of connection. This dude man, he didn't need to preface the question THAT hard, if at all.

[Duckenheimer]

The guy asking the question should be shot. Pretentious unnecessity.