ZOmGritCriss got owned on a god few occasions it was funny to watch oh by the way we are a product of our own thoughts what we thin is what we become. The weak dude who says he cannot gain sexual attraction towards women is wrong of course he can. Believe in your self go through all the stress you have to go through to get were you are and ieventually you will. Not Judging anyone
@deancrawford06 How can you honestly tell someone that ONLY has an attraction to the same sex that they don't and are capable of being attracted to the opposite sex. Sexuality is not some kind of a weakness, it is an emotional and sexual response to someone. Some people are attracted to there own sex, some attracted to the opposite sex, and some attracted to both. It sounds like you are one of those folks who believes that we are all bisexual, but that is just not a sound, reasonable belief.
Myself, and many other people like me have attempted to "convert" at a point in life. I had felt wrong and disgusting, so naturally I tried to change myself. It was totally impossible to do so. I had tried getting together with a female once, but there was zero physical attraction. I have also tried hetero porn. It never worked no matter how hard I tried. To say that we are all able to be attracted to both sexes is almost like saying that we are all able to be attracted
@deancrawford06 There is no such thing as an "ex-homosexual." sorry to break it to you (even though you won't believe me), but that is totally impossible, unless of course you were initially bisexual and just didn't know it. Most people who define themselves as "ex-homosexuals," typically revert to their former selves eventually. Sorry, but the success-rate statistics are not terribly in the favor of an ex-homosexual. You probably do not believe me now, but you probably will in time... or not...
@MyHairIsAbnormal Clearly you have issues and struggle with these facts. The Stats maybe not in the favour but if they can change there is no reason why anyone else can. Just one of these challenges that life presents us wither you choose to overcome it or not is entirely up to people. You just have to go through alot of stress and hard to overcome it. Just like any other challlenge life presents itself. 1/2
Buddha - A Man may conquer a thousand men, but he who conquers himself is the greatest conquerer of them all
Ghandi - A Man is a product of his own thoughts, what you think is what you become
By the way if people want to become Gay let them. It's funny when a Heterosexual tricked into the Homo lifestyle you lot say you were never straight anyway, but when Homosexuals want to change you would bully that individual into believeing it is not possible.
@MyHairIsAbnormal And one last thing who are you and anyone else to say that someone cnanot or cnanot acheive something even if it seems impossible? You are a clear example like the Gay indivual who did the video call thing that us heterosexuals are condemed well for believing in our heterosexuaity I mean seriously. That we fella by the way is a embaressment to men every were. The Guy is a Boy but yet he get's on like a wee girl
Theres no such thing an ex homosexuals, just like there is no such thing as an ex heterosexual. they are just brainwashed self hating idiots who are still sexually attracted to the same gender.
@bhavvv Brainwashed? Or maybe there were genreallly atteacted to the opposite sex but have been brainwashed to be Gay. As I said i dont care how they live there lives. The very fact you used the term Brainwashed strengthens my theory that is deprives from the mind. You are a prime example that when someone does nto embrace homosexuality they get hounded and bullied for it. Just for having a different opinion etc Anyone can change, the change is not easy and people need to believe
to the same people. That is clearly completely untrue.
This is how I take your argument. Believing in yourself has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AT ALL to do with sexuality. NOTHING. It is rude, ignorant, and straight out insane to assume that it is.
Now, I am aware that you will probably be able to find some ridiculous argument to refute what I have said, so I will just leave it here.
I like how he says "No matter how good of parents they are, a lesbian couple cannot provide a mother & a father." Makes sense. A man rapes and beats his daughter every day? Well...does he have a wife? He does? Well look on the bright side, at least she's not being raised by a pair of lesbos, yuck! She needs a mother and a father! Who cares if they're negligent and/or abusive towards her? At least she has STRAIGHT parents! She should be SO grateful that she wasn't adopted by gays!
That is such a parrocial, biggoted comment. And easily show as pure stupidity.
Say it like it is, Bub. You dont want it becasue you dont like it.
I agree, that a child will be brought up (generally) better between a man and a woman. Only because there's that balance of male and female. But it doesnt mean that the child will be any less happy. And it certainly won't dictate the child's sexual preference. At best, it'll introduce gay tolerence in the child's future.
We need a lot more peole like CRISTINA RAD fighting for our RIGHT's as Free-Thinkers in the public square, Oh yeah, I would also like to take the time to say that I'm a Agnostic-Atheist and proud of it, one can never be just a Atheist, because we don't know what the Future of Man's understanding of reality will be, so I think its the best position that one can have.
Children do best in loving homes and suffer in abusive ones. Gay, straight, bicurious make little difference. Love makes the difference. Abuse is abuse and it crosses all social barriers. Afterall, how many gay people have married traditionally, had kids, come out, and still made fantastic parents? I know a few great examples where this has happened.
What is it with this agnostic? I almost respect those christians more cuz at least they take a stand. Agnostics are: "Uhhm, I don't know. you don't know.. We're all confused.."
@ItsmeonY2 Theism and agnosticism are separate questions. You can either be an agnostic atheist or an agnostic theist (or gnostic atheist/theist). For whatever reason a lot of people think that 'agnosticism' is some in-between uncommitted escape option, usually when people use it like that they are atheists who just don't realize it - or are scared to admit it.
@nonameisacat agnostic: 1 one who is noncommital or undecided 2 one who believes ultimate knowledge is unattainable 3 one who does not hold a position about the existence of 'God' or believes it is unknowable.
You can draw a dichotomy of theist/atheist, use gnostic/agnostic as qualifiers to specify conviction, or use the positive definition of atheism and introduce agnostic as a third mutually exclusive descriptor. Unfortunately many only recognize a single definition of each word.
Look. You're either an atheist. Or you're not. You either believe or you dont.
Agnosticism = fail.
It's useless.
Agnosticism is right theoretically. It HAS to be. But in practice it dissolves. And if you disagree, I can prove why. But it seems we're both on the same page. So...
@nonameisacat most sources will describe agnosticism as the admittance of "not knowing" with respect to religious and atheistic claims. This does not mean confusion of any sort. I am not religious for a number of reasons, BUT as a scientist I admit that there are logical anomalies in science. As do many other prolific scientists. I acknowledge the possibility of a universal consciousness, but I do not uphold the view because it cannot be proven. There is no confusion in my mind whatsoever.
@yermawmycurlers , from that i take it you don't believe in the idea of a god, and that would make you an atheist. an agnostic atheist. if you do believe it, that would make you an agnostic theist. agnostic refers to knowledge, theist/atheist to belief.
@brownbigb for me it's not a case of believing it or disbelieving it... It's about assessing the likelihood of a conscious presence in any from, whether it simply be a collective. I have come to the conclusion that knowledge of such and existence is currently unknowable through the current constraints of the human mind, therefore I am neither, I am simply agnostic. I do not believe nor disbelieve, I concede that I cannot know.
@yermawmycurlers knowledge needs proof, and obviously that is not gonna happen here. so that is clear here. belief doesn't have to have proof, you can accept a belief on some evidence, or without any (faith), or you can reject said belief for lack of evidence. if you lack the belief that there is a god, you are an atheist. not disbelief, lack of belief. i don't believe nor disbelieve, i lack belief, hence i am an atheist. an agnostic atheist.
@brownbigb I take your point entirely... though I would prefer just to call myself agnostic because the phrase agnostic atheist can has complications for me. It's difficult to explain to someone else how you feel... I wouldn't even call it lack of belief, as I hold the belief that there COULD be a consciousness.
@ItsmeonY2 Only religious people don't take a stand. Saying they believe in something and actually believing in it isn't the same thing. Want to take a stand? He is an example: Next time a religious person needs a surgery to stay alive, don't get the surgery, instead pray away the illness. THAT would be taking a stand. What we call religion in this day and age is nothing more than posturing.
@ItsmeonY2 "I almost respect those christians more cuz at least they take a stand."
So, you have less respect for someone who says, "I don't know" to a question than for someone who says, "I know" despite having no evidence to support their position of knowledge?
the gospell says a bunch a primitive bull shit there is no god everybody knows that there is only love or whatever the hell ya wanna call it love is god
Even if hetero couples make slightly better parents than homosexual ones (big if), how is the child better off with NO parents, on the street? My parents had 8 kids, ALL adopted. If our parents were homosexual, I'm sure we would still have taken them.
3:42 Well, YOU're not clever enough to hide dodging the question AND stealing time for your bigoted views.
5:30 A mother and a father each bring different things to the family because they are different people, not because of different reproductive organs. Since when are a penis and a vagina proper parenting tools?
I have a mom and a dad and I see how holding bigoted ("traditional") values can make one unfit for parenting.
The 1st and 3rd panelists from left pleasantly surprised me a bit here.
I don't mind gay marriage and the right for gay people to raise children, as long as the child is adopted and not from a surrogate pregnancy, I say this because on the plus side, lesbian couples get the chance to experience giving birth, while gay men get the chance to watch their child be born, but on the negative side if tragedy occurs to the gay parents they actually add instead of decrease the rate of orphans, which to me doesn't make any sense 8(.
The Christians often argue that they have a right to teach their world view and values to their offspring. Now, a part of these values is this invalid notion that for a person to be able to develop into a human being he/she needs to be raised by a family formed of both sexes. However since we know this is absolute hogwash through science, I say, what right do the Christians have to impose their world view upon others i.e. to prevent lesbian couples with children to raise their children as family
It's impossible to concentrate on what they are saying because (A) everyone else seems to be a dick. (B) Cristina Rad is so damn hot. It would have been much more interesting just to hear an interview with her for half an hour.
I actually agree with Kristina in this bit. I appreciate that she has reasoned out that it is an act purely of love to adopt a child regardless of the sexual orientation of the parents. I really can't nail down what it is about homosexual parents that fundamentalists believe is harmful.
Claiming agnostic is pointless to a christian as i've said to one of "Cris's" own videos. The christian truly only hears, "I don't believe in the same thing you do." christian arguments are then baseless claims of the victims own believes and uttering nonsense such as you're going to burn in hell for eternity if u dnt. Therefor you state that an "annoying cunt" is simply someone who disagrees with you? I prefer to believe an "annoying cunt" is someone who doesn't object themselves to reasoning.
This is the point where I realized (again) why I hate religion. I thought Criss got pretty owned in the first 2 or 3 parts. I think she was out of her field/depth. It's a shame the programme ended when it got to a topic that she felt confident & qualified to talk about. I will say that I thought some of her comments, made in earlier sections, were floored but, I think she knew she was "winging it".
I love the myths created by the church(sarcasm). There was a recent study done in the US that children raised by two Lesbians are just as well adjusted as any other children and they are even better behaved than other children
20 seconds in annnnd she's wrong. Jesus clearly states that the old laws stay, not that he's tossing them out for new ones. Poor theology for someone who supposedly studied it.
@TheFodderBoy I would hardly say this is a clear support for harsh laws. Jesus is admonishing the hypocrisy of the pharisees for using scriptural law as it suited them (but not when it didn't). This is just the example he uses. Do you really think that Jesus believed killing someone who said bad things about their parents was an appropriate way to honour God?
@pitdroidtech Those 'harsh laws' were God's laws, and Jesus is clear that they're to be kept; therefore, yes, Jesus did think that it was appropriate. Unless you're trying to argue that Jesus didn't agree with God's laws.
@TheFodderBoy I think that Jesus was more concerned that someone's commitment to God was held in their heart rather than in the rigid adherence to scriptural laws. Jesus said "turn the other cheek". This is hardly compatible with the scriptural edicts of the old testament. "The entire law is summed up in a single command: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' (From the NIV Bible, Galatians 5:14)" This shows how Jesus viewed the law, not as strict principles but as pointers to this one concept.
@pitdroidtech Yes. The Bible contradicts itself. Congratulations on learning that, but the Bible contradicting itself doesn't make me wrong. Jesus said the old laws stand, I've shown not only where this is the case but also where he criticises people for not adhering to them.
You can't wrangle your way out of that just because the thing is inconsistent, especially as it never contradicts this one particular thing clearly, saying the old laws go: always it says they remain.
@pitdroidtech Yes. The Bible contradicts itself. Congratulations on learning that, but the Bible contradicting itself doesn't make me wrong. Jesus said the old laws stand, I've shown not only where this is the case but also where he criticises people for not adhering to them.
You can't wrangle your way out of that just because the thing is inconsistent, especially as it never contradicts this one particular thing clearly, saying the old laws go: always it says they remain.
Jamelia recently did a programme on British TV about the stigma of single parenthood as she is herself a single parent and was brought up in a mainly single parent house hold. Part of the programme talked to an Oxford Social Science/ Sociology Professor about a study he conducted into the effects of single parenthood and it found that it was the quality of the parenting and not the quantity of the parents that mattered to the child's welfare and development.
Was there even a Jesus?
clunie1959 3 days ago
feal sorry for Cristina they have her there because they have to have her there.
gggiiillllllyyy 1 week ago
ahahahahahahhah "can't go deep enough"
Triipticz 2 weeks ago
"we do!" LOL
AtheismTV 2 weeks ago
Cristina Rad heard Wallace's "gay agenda" dog whistle loud and clear.
2cabs2toucan 1 month ago
Where Cristina talks 2:45, 5:05, 10:40, funny moment 11:25
HAZFRAME 1 month ago 12
ZOmGritCriss got owned on a god few occasions it was funny to watch oh by the way we are a product of our own thoughts what we thin is what we become. The weak dude who says he cannot gain sexual attraction towards women is wrong of course he can. Believe in your self go through all the stress you have to go through to get were you are and ieventually you will. Not Judging anyone
deancrawford06 1 month ago
@deancrawford06 How can you honestly tell someone that ONLY has an attraction to the same sex that they don't and are capable of being attracted to the opposite sex. Sexuality is not some kind of a weakness, it is an emotional and sexual response to someone. Some people are attracted to there own sex, some attracted to the opposite sex, and some attracted to both. It sounds like you are one of those folks who believes that we are all bisexual, but that is just not a sound, reasonable belief.
MyHairIsAbnormal 1 month ago
@deancrawford06 Cont'd:
Myself, and many other people like me have attempted to "convert" at a point in life. I had felt wrong and disgusting, so naturally I tried to change myself. It was totally impossible to do so. I had tried getting together with a female once, but there was zero physical attraction. I have also tried hetero porn. It never worked no matter how hard I tried. To say that we are all able to be attracted to both sexes is almost like saying that we are all able to be attracted
MyHairIsAbnormal 1 month ago
@MyHairIsAbnormal Explain to me about the thousands of Ex-Homosexuals in the world? We are what we think
deancrawford06 1 month ago
@deancrawford06 There is no such thing as an "ex-homosexual." sorry to break it to you (even though you won't believe me), but that is totally impossible, unless of course you were initially bisexual and just didn't know it. Most people who define themselves as "ex-homosexuals," typically revert to their former selves eventually. Sorry, but the success-rate statistics are not terribly in the favor of an ex-homosexual. You probably do not believe me now, but you probably will in time... or not...
MyHairIsAbnormal 1 month ago
@MyHairIsAbnormal Clearly you have issues and struggle with these facts. The Stats maybe not in the favour but if they can change there is no reason why anyone else can. Just one of these challenges that life presents us wither you choose to overcome it or not is entirely up to people. You just have to go through alot of stress and hard to overcome it. Just like any other challlenge life presents itself. 1/2
deancrawford06 1 month ago
@MyHairIsAbnormal
Buddha - A Man may conquer a thousand men, but he who conquers himself is the greatest conquerer of them all
Ghandi - A Man is a product of his own thoughts, what you think is what you become
By the way if people want to become Gay let them. It's funny when a Heterosexual tricked into the Homo lifestyle you lot say you were never straight anyway, but when Homosexuals want to change you would bully that individual into believeing it is not possible.
deancrawford06 1 month ago
@deancrawford06 I think I've made my point clear enough. I'm done here.
MyHairIsAbnormal 1 month ago
@MyHairIsAbnormal And one last thing who are you and anyone else to say that someone cnanot or cnanot acheive something even if it seems impossible? You are a clear example like the Gay indivual who did the video call thing that us heterosexuals are condemed well for believing in our heterosexuaity I mean seriously. That we fella by the way is a embaressment to men every were. The Guy is a Boy but yet he get's on like a wee girl
deancrawford06 1 month ago
@deancrawford06
Theres no such thing an ex homosexuals, just like there is no such thing as an ex heterosexual. they are just brainwashed self hating idiots who are still sexually attracted to the same gender.
bhavvv 1 month ago
@bhavvv Brainwashed? Or maybe there were genreallly atteacted to the opposite sex but have been brainwashed to be Gay. As I said i dont care how they live there lives. The very fact you used the term Brainwashed strengthens my theory that is deprives from the mind. You are a prime example that when someone does nto embrace homosexuality they get hounded and bullied for it. Just for having a different opinion etc Anyone can change, the change is not easy and people need to believe
deancrawford06 1 month ago
@deancrawford06 you are an idiot.
brownbigb 2 weeks ago
@deancrawford06 Cont'd:
to the same people. That is clearly completely untrue.
This is how I take your argument. Believing in yourself has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AT ALL to do with sexuality. NOTHING. It is rude, ignorant, and straight out insane to assume that it is.
Now, I am aware that you will probably be able to find some ridiculous argument to refute what I have said, so I will just leave it here.
MyHairIsAbnormal 1 month ago
I like how he says "No matter how good of parents they are, a lesbian couple cannot provide a mother & a father." Makes sense. A man rapes and beats his daughter every day? Well...does he have a wife? He does? Well look on the bright side, at least she's not being raised by a pair of lesbos, yuck! She needs a mother and a father! Who cares if they're negligent and/or abusive towards her? At least she has STRAIGHT parents! She should be SO grateful that she wasn't adopted by gays!
justanotherelphie123 1 month ago
Just let Cristina do all the talking, she is the only one with a brain.
LYTHBAND 1 month ago 4
At 11:53)
That is such a parrocial, biggoted comment. And easily show as pure stupidity.
Say it like it is, Bub. You dont want it becasue you dont like it.
I agree, that a child will be brought up (generally) better between a man and a woman. Only because there's that balance of male and female. But it doesnt mean that the child will be any less happy. And it certainly won't dictate the child's sexual preference. At best, it'll introduce gay tolerence in the child's future.
Domzdream 1 month ago
We need a lot more peole like CRISTINA RAD fighting for our RIGHT's as Free-Thinkers in the public square, Oh yeah, I would also like to take the time to say that I'm a Agnostic-Atheist and proud of it, one can never be just a Atheist, because we don't know what the Future of Man's understanding of reality will be, so I think its the best position that one can have.
k9a2g6 1 month ago
Children do best in loving homes and suffer in abusive ones. Gay, straight, bicurious make little difference. Love makes the difference. Abuse is abuse and it crosses all social barriers. Afterall, how many gay people have married traditionally, had kids, come out, and still made fantastic parents? I know a few great examples where this has happened.
guerrillaroach 1 month ago 2
I think the white-haired guy is my new hero.
sinmantyx 1 month ago
What is it with this agnostic? I almost respect those christians more cuz at least they take a stand. Agnostics are: "Uhhm, I don't know. you don't know.. We're all confused.."
ItsmeonY2 2 months ago 2
@ItsmeonY2 Theism and agnosticism are separate questions. You can either be an agnostic atheist or an agnostic theist (or gnostic atheist/theist). For whatever reason a lot of people think that 'agnosticism' is some in-between uncommitted escape option, usually when people use it like that they are atheists who just don't realize it - or are scared to admit it.
nonameisacat 1 month ago 7
@nonameisacat agnostic: 1 one who is noncommital or undecided 2 one who believes ultimate knowledge is unattainable 3 one who does not hold a position about the existence of 'God' or believes it is unknowable.
You can draw a dichotomy of theist/atheist, use gnostic/agnostic as qualifiers to specify conviction, or use the positive definition of atheism and introduce agnostic as a third mutually exclusive descriptor. Unfortunately many only recognize a single definition of each word.
urcorrect 1 month ago
@nonameisacat
See how unnecessarily complicated it is?
Look. You're either an atheist. Or you're not. You either believe or you dont.
Agnosticism = fail.
It's useless.
Agnosticism is right theoretically. It HAS to be. But in practice it dissolves. And if you disagree, I can prove why. But it seems we're both on the same page. So...
Domzdream 1 month ago
@nonameisacat
Actually Criss herself recently did a video on this very topic where she would probably disagree with you.
david2869 1 month ago
@nonameisacat most sources will describe agnosticism as the admittance of "not knowing" with respect to religious and atheistic claims. This does not mean confusion of any sort. I am not religious for a number of reasons, BUT as a scientist I admit that there are logical anomalies in science. As do many other prolific scientists. I acknowledge the possibility of a universal consciousness, but I do not uphold the view because it cannot be proven. There is no confusion in my mind whatsoever.
yermawmycurlers 1 month ago
@yermawmycurlers , from that i take it you don't believe in the idea of a god, and that would make you an atheist. an agnostic atheist. if you do believe it, that would make you an agnostic theist. agnostic refers to knowledge, theist/atheist to belief.
brownbigb 2 weeks ago
@brownbigb for me it's not a case of believing it or disbelieving it... It's about assessing the likelihood of a conscious presence in any from, whether it simply be a collective. I have come to the conclusion that knowledge of such and existence is currently unknowable through the current constraints of the human mind, therefore I am neither, I am simply agnostic. I do not believe nor disbelieve, I concede that I cannot know.
yermawmycurlers 2 weeks ago
@yermawmycurlers knowledge needs proof, and obviously that is not gonna happen here. so that is clear here. belief doesn't have to have proof, you can accept a belief on some evidence, or without any (faith), or you can reject said belief for lack of evidence. if you lack the belief that there is a god, you are an atheist. not disbelief, lack of belief. i don't believe nor disbelieve, i lack belief, hence i am an atheist. an agnostic atheist.
brownbigb 2 weeks ago
@brownbigb I take your point entirely... though I would prefer just to call myself agnostic because the phrase agnostic atheist can has complications for me. It's difficult to explain to someone else how you feel... I wouldn't even call it lack of belief, as I hold the belief that there COULD be a consciousness.
yermawmycurlers 2 weeks ago
@yermawmycurlers has*
yermawmycurlers 2 weeks ago
@ItsmeonY2 Only religious people don't take a stand. Saying they believe in something and actually believing in it isn't the same thing. Want to take a stand? He is an example: Next time a religious person needs a surgery to stay alive, don't get the surgery, instead pray away the illness. THAT would be taking a stand. What we call religion in this day and age is nothing more than posturing.
ominous24 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ItsmeonY2 "I almost respect those christians more cuz at least they take a stand."
So, you have less respect for someone who says, "I don't know" to a question than for someone who says, "I know" despite having no evidence to support their position of knowledge?
thisisaguy 1 month ago
More Cristina, less old guys talking.
endthedisease 2 months ago 22
the gospell says a bunch a primitive bull shit there is no god everybody knows that there is only love or whatever the hell ya wanna call it love is god
archie977 2 months ago
Wow, go Cristina!
GenerationBright 2 months ago 3
Even if hetero couples make slightly better parents than homosexual ones (big if), how is the child better off with NO parents, on the street? My parents had 8 kids, ALL adopted. If our parents were homosexual, I'm sure we would still have taken them.
Christobanistan 2 months ago
3:42 Well, YOU're not clever enough to hide dodging the question AND stealing time for your bigoted views.
5:30 A mother and a father each bring different things to the family because they are different people, not because of different reproductive organs. Since when are a penis and a vagina proper parenting tools?
I have a mom and a dad and I see how holding bigoted ("traditional") values can make one unfit for parenting.
The 1st and 3rd panelists from left pleasantly surprised me a bit here.
Unbeginner 2 months ago 2
Whether or not it's better to have straight parents isn't it better to have a same sex couple as parents than no parents at all?
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't mind gay marriage and the right for gay people to raise children, as long as the child is adopted and not from a surrogate pregnancy, I say this because on the plus side, lesbian couples get the chance to experience giving birth, while gay men get the chance to watch their child be born, but on the negative side if tragedy occurs to the gay parents they actually add instead of decrease the rate of orphans, which to me doesn't make any sense 8(.
curtis8315 2 months ago
Comment removed
curtis8315 2 months ago
The Christians often argue that they have a right to teach their world view and values to their offspring. Now, a part of these values is this invalid notion that for a person to be able to develop into a human being he/she needs to be raised by a family formed of both sexes. However since we know this is absolute hogwash through science, I say, what right do the Christians have to impose their world view upon others i.e. to prevent lesbian couples with children to raise their children as family
metonAlternate 2 months ago
Woah, did Criss just say "we" want the same rights as straight people? Is she a lesbian? Or bisexual? <3
Xx13Krystyn13xX 2 months ago
@Xx13Krystyn13xX I think she was just saying what the gay agenda would be if there was one, it would be "we want the same rights as straigt people"
AntiMatterWave 2 months ago
It's impossible to concentrate on what they are saying because (A) everyone else seems to be a dick. (B) Cristina Rad is so damn hot. It would have been much more interesting just to hear an interview with her for half an hour.
chaosroyalevideo 2 months ago 2
I'm rather annoyed that every time the debate seems to get going the host moves on to another speaker.
valkolakk 2 months ago
I actually agree with Kristina in this bit. I appreciate that she has reasoned out that it is an act purely of love to adopt a child regardless of the sexual orientation of the parents. I really can't nail down what it is about homosexual parents that fundamentalists believe is harmful.
valkolakk 2 months ago
@gmawjune As far as I know, she's married to a dude.
@TheMrgoku1985 She's an atheist.
It doesn't seem fair to me that they invited only one atheist, and she's also a lot younger than the others. I think she did a good job, anyway.
stupidandcontagiousx 2 months ago
Can't go deep enough......no pun intended.
The audience needs to get their heads out the gutter, lol.
honda2363 2 months ago
As long as the child gets a good start on life!
Get U´re nose out of the rest....!!!!
naglphar 2 months ago
So the Romanian with the curly hair is a jew?
TheMrgoku1985 2 months ago
@TheMrgoku1985
Who? Cris?
No. What makes you think she's a Jew? She is an Atheist.
RedSkyNord 2 months ago
Claiming agnostic is pointless to a christian as i've said to one of "Cris's" own videos. The christian truly only hears, "I don't believe in the same thing you do." christian arguments are then baseless claims of the victims own believes and uttering nonsense such as you're going to burn in hell for eternity if u dnt. Therefor you state that an "annoying cunt" is simply someone who disagrees with you? I prefer to believe an "annoying cunt" is someone who doesn't object themselves to reasoning.
tsnb420 2 months ago
Criss seemed a little nervous and not at her best up there; but she got into a little bit more of a groove towards the end.
brez002 2 months ago
@brez002 agreed.
pacifiedfools 2 months ago
Can science please explain homosexuality...so that I could justify it? After this the question would become what 'category' to put it in.
DistortedV12 3 months ago in playlist More videos from nonameisacat
Oh my god, Zomgits didn't say anything stupid, hypocritical or ignorant in this video.
memonk11 3 months ago
Wait a minute, Zom is gay?!
Fuck...
gmawjune 3 months ago
@gmawjune If you didn't know that...you were living under a rock...
ATLMastering 3 months ago
@ATLMastering I don't think she's gay. If she is then how the fuck did you know?
TheAssesKicker 2 months ago
@TheAssesKicker She referred to gay people as "we", so...
ATLMastering 2 months ago
Comment removed
AKTIONxSKINS 2 months ago
Comment removed
AKTIONxSKINS 2 months ago
Comment removed
AKTIONxSKINS 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ATLMastering
Cris said "we" in a narrative context.
She herself is not gay.
She is actually married.
AKTIONxSKINS 2 months ago
@gmawjune
No, she is married - to a man.
She said "we" in a narrative context.
AKTIONxSKINS 2 months ago 3
@gmawjune no, she's married to a man that works out of country. i think her shady English is to blame for the slip up.
HAZFRAME 1 month ago
If you allow two lesbians marry another guy - the child will have a father too.
yasumi07 3 months ago
it looks like the only people who put restrains on other's freedom have some kind of agenda
elieattie 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is the point where I realized (again) why I hate religion. I thought Criss got pretty owned in the first 2 or 3 parts. I think she was out of her field/depth. It's a shame the programme ended when it got to a topic that she felt confident & qualified to talk about. I will say that I thought some of her comments, made in earlier sections, were floored but, I think she knew she was "winging it".
MrLittletomdj 3 months ago
Comment removed
MrLittletomdj 3 months ago
good answers Criss=) / a bella
IceysMoment 4 months ago
in the bible u can own a slave
FIGHTFANNERD3 5 months ago
gay people and morons should not be having kids
but gay people should be allowed to adopt kids
FIGHTFANNERD3 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FIGHTFANNERD3
"gay people... [should not] be having kids"
"but gay people [should be allowed] to adopt kids"
Do you read what you post because you don't make jack sense.
What is the difference between gays raising children that they have given birth to vs raising children that you've adopted?
RedSkyNord 2 months ago
if you reduce love to sex then u dont know what love is
FIGHTFANNERD3 5 months ago
I love the myths created by the church(sarcasm). There was a recent study done in the US that children raised by two Lesbians are just as well adjusted as any other children and they are even better behaved than other children
rhetoric2k 5 months ago 2
20 seconds in annnnd she's wrong. Jesus clearly states that the old laws stay, not that he's tossing them out for new ones. Poor theology for someone who supposedly studied it.
TheFodderBoy 5 months ago
@TheFodderBoy I don't believe you. Point to the scripture that claims he said that.
pitdroidtech 5 months ago
@pitdroidtech Matthew 5:17-18, Luek 16:17. See Mark 7:9-13 for him scolding people for not following God's Old Testament, kill people dead, laws.
So uh, yeah. Believe it.
TheFodderBoy 5 months ago
@TheFodderBoy I would hardly say this is a clear support for harsh laws. Jesus is admonishing the hypocrisy of the pharisees for using scriptural law as it suited them (but not when it didn't). This is just the example he uses. Do you really think that Jesus believed killing someone who said bad things about their parents was an appropriate way to honour God?
pitdroidtech 5 months ago
@pitdroidtech Those 'harsh laws' were God's laws, and Jesus is clear that they're to be kept; therefore, yes, Jesus did think that it was appropriate. Unless you're trying to argue that Jesus didn't agree with God's laws.
TheFodderBoy 5 months ago
@TheFodderBoy I think that Jesus was more concerned that someone's commitment to God was held in their heart rather than in the rigid adherence to scriptural laws. Jesus said "turn the other cheek". This is hardly compatible with the scriptural edicts of the old testament. "The entire law is summed up in a single command: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' (From the NIV Bible, Galatians 5:14)" This shows how Jesus viewed the law, not as strict principles but as pointers to this one concept.
pitdroidtech 5 months ago
@pitdroidtech Yes. The Bible contradicts itself. Congratulations on learning that, but the Bible contradicting itself doesn't make me wrong. Jesus said the old laws stand, I've shown not only where this is the case but also where he criticises people for not adhering to them.
You can't wrangle your way out of that just because the thing is inconsistent, especially as it never contradicts this one particular thing clearly, saying the old laws go: always it says they remain.
TheFodderBoy 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pitdroidtech Yes. The Bible contradicts itself. Congratulations on learning that, but the Bible contradicting itself doesn't make me wrong. Jesus said the old laws stand, I've shown not only where this is the case but also where he criticises people for not adhering to them.
You can't wrangle your way out of that just because the thing is inconsistent, especially as it never contradicts this one particular thing clearly, saying the old laws go: always it says they remain.
TheFodderBoy 5 months ago
Luke, not Luek. Not used to this keyboard.
TheFodderBoy 5 months ago
I believe there were laws to prevent gay behaviour before 1997 in Tasmania
Ronanland 5 months ago
it is criss gay? I tought she has a boyfriend
mascarafea1 5 months ago
how depressing. they fight progress tooth and nail, just as they have for thousands of years.
jeebersjumpincryst 5 months ago
Jamelia recently did a programme on British TV about the stigma of single parenthood as she is herself a single parent and was brought up in a mainly single parent house hold. Part of the programme talked to an Oxford Social Science/ Sociology Professor about a study he conducted into the effects of single parenthood and it found that it was the quality of the parenting and not the quantity of the parents that mattered to the child's welfare and development.
Zed1967 5 months ago
The agnostic is such an annoying cunt. (the guy next to Cris)
Christ724 5 months ago 27
50% of marriages end with 2 single parent families.
Snarkathon 5 months ago 36
@Snarkathon indeed or worse
FIGHTFANNERD3 5 months ago