Added: 3 years ago
From: RacecarTV
Views: 272,750
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (281)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The veyron is in the video, it's in the back of the caterham LOL.

  • the veyron will beat this car anyday in terms of comfort, style and top speed. who cares if this accelerates faster than the veyron? LOL.

  • @nrcharlie Only to 60 as well. It takes 6 seconds in a caterham to go from 100 to 120 mph. The Veyron is still accelerating at nearly the same rate as when it first took off. But this thing will kick its ass around a track, its not a veyron beater.

  • enough of this "veyron beating" nonsense. they're 2 COMPLETELY different cars. you can't just take one category out of context and then call a car a "veyron beater". it's no different than if you called a toyota prius a "veyron beater" for gas mileage LOL stop trying to grab attention by comparing it to something very popular, the caterham is popular too, it doesn't need your stupid help to get attention

  • @thnk4urself Why not comparing a fat super gt like the veyron to a club racer in terms of powet to weight ratio?

  • @thnk4urself A category out of context? I don't think so. 2 performance cars were compared to each other. But does it really matter?

  • hmmm! where is the veyron? it does say " veyron beating" an yet theres no veyron to be seen...

  • Shouldn't he be wearing a helmet? Wouldn't his face get ruined?

  • @ThatsMr420ToYouSon Well it does have twice the power to weight ratio of a Veyron! Granted it doesn't have 4 wheel drive and tyres the size of steamrollers to get off the line, plus it has all the aerodynamic qualities of a wheelie bin, but around a track I can't think of any Supercar that would get close to it. (The Ariel Atom V8 and Caparo T1 are not supercars, they are nutters cars.)

  • Veyron beating? I don't think so. The caterham is a fine fine machine but come on now. Really?

  • @ThatsMr420ToYouSon yea really

  • On a serious note,fuck the bugatti.

    lol

  • @Paulubliner This car sounds like a running blender at full throttle.

    Big thumbs up for the worlds shittiest kit car.

    Lulz Hyabusa!ufail.

  • @DON619ST38:

    Does anyone who has read this comment agree that this fellow has "issues?"

  • @paullubliner You sir are a complete fucking idiot.enjoy your caterham.lulz middle aged men getting butthurt over thier piece of shit kit cars.

  • @paullubliner Keep replying,it shows how angry and stupid you truely are.

    I find it funny you're looking for others to help enforce your thought "i have issues" yet even on Caterham and Train videos..nobody comes to help you.

    Welcome to YT,idiot.enjoy the trolling.

  • @paullubliner yeah i agree hes probably some dumbass american who only like the veyron because its got 1000bhp.

  • Had to reply to mine,his channel is being tempremental.

  • Lol at all the people claiming they'd take the caterhams over a veyron,only a crazy retard would..only reason you say this is because not even in your wildest dreams can you begin to believe you could afford one..so you just took the second best thing..which IMHO isn't near as good...if you sacrifice alot of your safety for speed..then there are much much better "vehicles" out there.

  • Comment removed

  • @paullubliner Definatly the bus,that was very amusing.

    Umad your caterham is a stripped down failboat?

  • Comment removed

  • @paullubliner Indefinatly.

    Fanboy.

  • Comment removed

  • @paullubliner I think it's Hayabusa,fanboy.

    Correct little fanboy?

  • Comment removed

  • @DON619ST38 Ha,umad you have to drive a caterham to even attempt to compete?

    and you compare it to production cars,even bigger lulz.

    You sir are an idiot and obviously angry,keep replying.

  • @paullubliner Middle aged men with a midlife crisis should stay away from Busa imo.It'll eat you fanboy.

    Correct little fanboy?

  • Comment removed

  • The tittle is confusing, i was expecting watch a video where a veyron overtake at high speed a Caterham...

  • @FrattyGear bah! doors are for pussies, and the air conditioning is the air flowing past your face.

  • That thing spins in like every gear doesnt it. Savage

    

  • All depends on what you want. If anyone thinks Bugatti (VW) can't build something like the Caterham, well I don't have to explain that do I? Caterham trying to build something like the Veyron? Mmmmm. No. Neither wants to be in the others market ...but many companies could build something like the Caterham.

  • Comment removed

  • where is the helmet? O.o

    

  • Caterham is very good but don´t put the veyron name to scam people!

  • Beat the Veyron how? Top speed?....No......0-60? Veyron is what....2.5 seconds? What does that bug do? Little sucker sounds great though. I guess if money wasn't an issue I would just get em' both!

  • Caterham = Much more fun for less money.

  • @Arthurzeiro fun on a 400mile journey though, nope, will take the veyron for that task thanks!

  • this car is limited to 149 mph

  • is that a full sequental or with clutch?

  • slow and ugly

  • I think a 4 rotor motor would fit. Turbo THAT and then it would be better.

  • @carmodifire that car is for track racing and i dont think a turbo would be good because of turbo lag..

  • @BIHxJDMxSUPRA Turbo cars are usually faster than non turbos. Also, a 4 rotor motor creates more exhaust gas, so that means less lag.

  • Comment removed

  • @carmodifire More power does not necessarily mean faster on a track.

  • @MyOpinionMatterss yes but 2 cars that are the same except 1 with more power and set up for it will be faster, usually.

  • put on some glasses, man.

  • I thought i was going to see a caterham beat a veyron at anything.first of all that damn go cart has no windshield.its sounds like its redlining or it has to rev like hell to get hp which tells me it doesnt have enough torque to catch a veyron anywhere.i dont even think this has the drag coefficient to get to 155mph let alone 250,269 on the veyron ss.it looks like a fun ride but compairing to the king makes no sense.

  • This is not a veyron competitor, it competes with the fastest Ariel atoms and the caparo t1

  • @levy3poop apparently it's 2.3-2.5 s

  • damn thing sounds like an F1!! I wonder what RPM he was turning, surely it was upward of 13k...

  • what's the 0-60 on that beauty?

  • Thats a fucking nice car,

  • Bugatti is better !, more sensations !

  • Veyron beating ???? so it does 432kph ??? But wheres the satnav and cd player ....oh ...and roof????

  • @andgate2000 satnavs cd players and roofs are for women and gays

  • i say keep a veyron, caterhams are just more fun.

  • This sounds rather fast :p

    Any specs to read through? 0-60, 0-100 etc?

  • @smartergroup

    0 to 60 MPH is quoted at "less than three seconds" and its limited to 150 MPH, but its more the speed the it can carry through the corners and its handling characteristics that set it apart from most other 500 HP + cars.

  • no helmet not even glasses, this dude is wild.

  • Amazing that a car designed in the fifties is still one of the fastest in the world...I want one.

  • Dam right put a helmet on. If you had a fly hit you in the face it would be like a bullet being shot at you

  • Put a helmet on...

  • sounds like 25000 rpm.....

  • 115000 pounds

  • Big engine in a small car...hmm...thats good

  • Pardon my youthful ignorance but a R500 has a faster lap time around the Top Gear test track and that only has 250-odd bhp, 500 must be stretching the tyres a bit, surely?

  • helmets anyone?

  • looks like a fun car, not really a daily driver though, what do these cost?

  • Crazy, it still sounds like a yamaha sports bike. . . .

  • @pantsman29

    Well, its two suzuki Busa engines joined together, thats why it sound so like a bike.

  • holy shit 530kgs say 700-800 depending on driver and passenger it would be scary quick the bhp/tonne would be incredible :)

  • Why so slow in the turns? Looks like he's about to fall asleep...

  • You shouldnt really buy this car..... You will die, you just will....

  • Holy shi7

  • What happens if you roll it?

  • @DarkKnightBob1o1 Your Fucked. lol

  • caterham vs veyron.hahahahahahahahaha.only in your dreams you can compare a CAR like veyron,with a toy, like caterham.the bugatti is a technological masterpiece,and the caterham just a good toy for track days

  • all that power for a small wheelbase rear wheel drive. that'll be damn tricky at the limit me thinks. glad its not turbo charged or you'd be in a hedge.

  • @DarkKnightBob1o1

    u do know its supercharged?

  • @tpvalley yes*sigh* super charging gives a different power delivery. A turbo that would bring about 500bhp would end up causing you to lose control when you topped out

  • @DarkKnightBob1o1

    and u dont think 500 instant bhp in a 500kg car might also have hedge seeking powers?

  • @tpvalley No 500 hp car has an instant 500 hp lol. Superchargers deliver power much more linear than turbochargers.

  • @MyOpinionMatterss

    your nit picking methinks.

    getting full power in less than 2 seconds ie the time it takes to floor it to me is instant power.

    The point is its very powerful, responsive and light, so to the average driver is a hedge seeker.

  • christ what kind of tires do they have on that thing

  • Oh. My. God.

  • i would wear a helmet.. atleast

  • Caterham's are just awesome - even with only the little engines

  • That thing looks to be genuinely evil in the upper 20% of its rpm range. I bet its a hoot to drive.

  • honestly, i would only take the veyron so that i could pawn it for a caterham and a house lol. Veyrons arent fun to drive like caterhams and you need like 4 miles to even get up to speed. it just depends on your cup of tea i guess

  • No, im completey with you, if i had a Ron, id sell it and buy a house and a few cars too.

  • @callowaymotorcompany ok I respect that you love this car more, but you say a Veyron needs 4 miles to even get up speed, do you really think a car with 1001 hp or in case of the SuperSport even 1200 hp is slow from 0-60? it does it in 2,5 seconds, and in 30 seconds you are at 350 kmph

  • @swordkillax Dont take everything so seriously. For one the supersport wasnt out when i made the comment. Two, i didnt say it was slow from 0-60. I said it would take about 4 miles to get up to speed. The caterham can get to top speed in a relatively short space. On the other hand, the veyron is so heavy and fast that to get to top speed would take a loooong straight road. In a realistic race, its safe to say the veyron would get smoked.

  • @swordkillax Didn't Clarkson lose it over the Veyron coming in 4th or the like? No one car is the ultimate for every type of racing.

  • @callowaymotorcompany Depends on what you mean by 'up to speed'. In my book 320 km/h is quite fast too, heh. Veyron: 0–100 km/h (0–62.1 mph) 2.46 seconds - 0–240 km/h (0–149.1 mph) 9.8 seconds - 0–300 km/h (0–186.4 mph) 15 seconds - 0–400 km/h (0–248.5 mph) - 50 seconds. But I think both cars are pretty effing fun, in their own ways.

  • @JellyBird12 

    I imagine you like rap music too.

  • Whats your point?

  • Just love them,fun,fun fun,my Seven has only 175 bhp but it weighs 520 kilo.s,0 to 60 in 4.5sec,more fun than a Veyron,a Caterham says l love driving,where as a Veyron says l love money,

  • I couldn't agree with you more!

  • @Twirly60 I practice racing in one, and whenever I put my foot down, a smile comes to my face =]

  • @Twirly60

    how much is the cost of that car?

  • gotta love caterham approach to car making!!

  • top gear should do a duel with this and the atom 500. i would rather a caterham win though lool

  • sorry, you dont do 300 miles an hour in a open- top car.

  • Nah it surely wouldn't... don't forget that even aero-friction has enough stopping power to consume most of available horsepower. In most of cars at speed of 250km/h (150mph) force needed to overcome aero-friction equals gravity force, so.... so just imagine how much it is :) It would be a little thrill to gain even more speed with a car with no additional aero-downforce.

  • I absolutely LOVE this Caterham. Sounds sooo nice.

  • that thing is insane. i love it

  • Wow those two old men just ran a track with no helmet.

  • they wanted to feel the wind in their...(no hair)... nvm helmets are a must...

  • id go for levante or atom 500 :D

  • i think the 500 has a better power to weight ratio. i'd take it.

  • wear goggles or a helmet, and it is sequential it says so at end of vid

  • Is that a sequential transmission?

  • appears to be.

  • lol, can't you tell?

    (Yes, it is)

  • first of all that is a quick car and they a freaking stupid not wearing helmets my dad lost like half of his vision he doesnt see very good in handball imagine what will happen if they get a insect in their eyes not even glasses would make that up

  • The sound is definately Veyron beating.

  • wear helmets

  • veryron beating because of its power to weight ratio.

    Darrrrrrrr

  • Also, the only real ways to get the Veyron to those 250+ mph speeds where it beats the Caterham are:

    A) the autobahn, or

    B) a drag strip.

    On almost any other track you might take either car to, my money's on the Caterham.

  • i recon you could take the drag strip out of there.......

    even on a 1/4 mile the caterham is so quick at low speeds the veyron would struggle to keep up....

    boy that would be a good race though, i suppose it could go eithe way

  • My money would be on the veyron because of the awd. The Caterham is so damn light it could struggle to hook up and and get power down. It would be close though, do doubt about that.

  • No, no levante def win. Twice the power-to weight ratio of veyron. Its basically a motorbike - don't think "it could struggle to hook up and get power down". motorbike beat veyron everytime, especially 2 put together.

  • I highly doubt you have driven either so you do not know that the levante will DEFINITELY win. You cant know for sure. Many good drag racers will tell you that the 1/4 mile is won in the first 60 feet. The veyron would have the advantage in those 60 feet. You saying that a bike would beat a veyron EVERY time shows just how little you know about this.

  • I think we need a veyron vs levante race vid...

  • and btw i say everytime to get across a point...i think it very very u put veyron and levante on one occasion, the caterham will win

  • saabaru, u say the veyron has the advantage in first 60 feet, presumably coz the awd and traction control. There are 2 reasons the levante doesn't have either of those. 1, caterham is driving in its purest form, but more importantly, it doesn't need them. Like I said, I've never seen seen a motorbike struggle to get power down, and levante wouldnt either. Goes to show just how you little you know about this. It may go either way, but my money's definitley on the levante.

  • bikes generally don't struggle to get their power down because: 1. the rider is sitting pretty much over the back wheel, 2: high cg = more weight transfer, 3: bikes with lots of power just pop the front in the air and the rider has to back off anyway. Also, if the levante goes like a bike, then it has little chance. 0-100km/h: veyron = 2.5s, hayabusa = 3s.

  • last time i checked haybusa wasn't 2000cc like levante. catherham 0-100km 2.5 secs :)

  • you were comparing a bike to this and the veyron. my comment still stands

  • Comment removed

  • and even on drag strip the caterham would be though to beat

  • @derschwarzgeist ...i don't know of any drag strips where you can get to 250 mph+ with anything short of a funny car or a top fuel dragster. so this caterham wins in every situation, except for the autobahn and the texas mile lol

  • @derschwarzgeist I don't think you can get a Veyron to 250+ on a drag strip, or the autobahn for that matter. You need a really long straight stretch of road (a couple of miles at least) to get it there

  • Good video and great car, just wondering why u called it "Veyron-Beating" though?? (apart from gettin utube views!) Their 2 different cars entirely. Yes, this would slaughter it on a track, but lets see a Caterham clock 250+ mph

  • cant beleive how stable it looks with all that power, obviously a lot of work has gone into that beast!!!

  • its cars like these that might actually give up motorcycles

  • That thing is sick.

  • Where is the veyron? Great car though.

  • The video is called the 'Veyron-Beating' Caterham Levante. Not a Caterham Levante beating a Bugatti Veyron ;)

    Sorry to disappoint, glad you like the car.

  • This car's insane almost 1000 bhp per ton its really an achievement. I'd like to see it go against the Caparo T1 or Ariel Atom V8, if you ever happen to get a video of it puhleeeeeeze upload it!

    PS 5 stars for your vid sir

  • this car lapped 1min 19.6sec around the west circuit of bedford autodrome, the T1 did it in 1min 14.8sec and an ariel atom 3 (i know it's not the one you mentioned, but it's worth telling) took 1min 21.5sec

  • really? well, the Caparo has a massive amount of downforce at high speeds so it sounds logic, although I would have expected more from the Levante.

    Do you know if Caparo is planning on running the T1 on Nürburgring? it might even be able to beat the Radical SR8 :)

  • i have no idea, maybe there are unofficial times somewhere, of owners who had a go, but caparo has so far shown no intentions of taking the T1 to The Ring

  • @RacecarTV o i get u mean this caterham has wut it take 2 beat a veyron lol u kno the veyron has 450bhp per ton while this caterham has 900bhp per ton?!? thats scary

  • @RacecarTV Nice car dude unfortunately im not a fan of the front lights but what ever floats your boat.

  • @RacecarTV, I watched this video to see the Veyron beating it. Damn you!!!! ;)

  • @MarTex Lol. you don't understand hyphens

  • My dad has a Caterham and it's awesome to drive in. :)

  • uhh... i would be wearing a helmet, just a thought. stupid fast...

  • damn...

  • this thing screams like a bitch!

  • £115,000

  • lol its so dangerous though, it has no roof or decent doors !

  • hmm

    how much does it cost?

  • Around £115k, only 8 were made

  • 115k?!!?!!

    :O!!!!

  • Everything is bespoke, and the engine is handbuilt for the car. So costs would be a little more than you'd expect from a mass-produced car.

  • ok

    anyways

    its a fast car

  • @Brementuning007 and worth every penny

  • in-fucking-sane

  • I'm love in it... Cat lover

  • This guy is a good driver but he is being a bit conservative...

  • He is the guy who built it from the ground-up - on a bit of a shite surface, on one of its maiden test runs, so yes, he's being a little conservative ;)

  • those headlight have got to go

  • DO WANT!

  • Certainly not the prettiest Caterham out there ... but then again, who cares ;-)

  • I didn't think it was possible to take a pure, original shape as the caterham 7and improve it by simply adding extra headlights and a few other body mods without ruining it or making it look like it had been pimped. I was right.

  • despite what everyone thinks, beating the veyron isnt THAT big an achievement. Much lower powered versons of the caterham have beaten it

  • You're absolutely right. The thing with the Veyron is that it is as comfortable at 200mph as it is at 20mph. Anybody could drive it. That Caterham would kill me about 4.5 seconds after I turned the key!

  • but it is also waaaay cheaper

  • This is very true! The caterham also makes a nicer noise and I know which my friends would be more impressed with and it isn't the £800,000 one!

  • hmmm extra valve for intake or exhaust?