The VN got the same fuel economy as the Camry but was vastly more powerful (okay the interior went a bit squidgy with age and ring life was disappointing (about 170k) - but this wouldnt affect a new buyer).
The 3.9L EA "Super Pursuit" was a grade A dog.
The "Pacer" with a 3.2, a 3 speed auto and TBI was much more reliable, although the body problems still existed.
The 4.0L "EA II" had most of the problems fixed - but more fuel consumption.
picked up a VN sedan 100% stock for $1988 with heaps of reg, RWC n on road costs from a dealer today. Its been a round since 1988 I figure if it gives about 3 years more of motoring then Ill have no complaints. Apart from the typical clear coat peal its straight n clean
What a dark era that was for cars...quality and looks were at an all-time low. The EA was a boat with a head gasket made of cheese, and the VN was about as refined as the people that are driving them these days.
Which proved to be the more popular of the two? Both are good looking cars. Both are made in Australia, which helps. If I were living in Australia, or even just visiting, which should I buy? The Holden Commodore or the Ford Falcon?
@Seattlecarnut Sales figures spoke for themselves; the EA Falcon lost the race because they had huge problems. Had they spent a few more months on R&D, they could have saved themselves a whole lot of trouble. Also, Ford didn't take the hint and release a V8 model unil long after Holden introduced its new fuel injected V8
@Mechknight73 The VN was spinning crankshaft bearings like it was going out of fashion. Go to any holden dealership at the time and you would have seen stuffed engines a plenty on the workshop floor. Compared to the EA doing the occasional head gasket. Hardly a comparison. The 3.8 was a 30 y/o engine already when the commodore was released. At least the 4.0l ford was an Australian engine, and is still at the top as far as aussie sixes are concerned.
@bbbcreations 'the occasional head gasket' At Thompson Ford in Parramatta,NSW.They where replacing 4 out of 10 heads on cars within the first 6 months of warranty. A new design engine which had virtually the same crank,rods and oil pump from the XY 250.Even the bore centers where kept the same to save costs on tooling.It was new Cheap and nasty design.VN spun cam bearings because some weren't given enough bearing clearance.Those failures where less than 1% of production.
@GhettoDynamiczInc However, you forget the long list of problems with the EA; head gaskets blowing at 50,000km, unable to hold a wheel alignment, oil leaks from everywhere, suspect wiring (have seen one almost catch fire with my own eyes) even dodgier cornering, and untrustworthy instruments. The VNs had their problems, but nowhere near as many long-term as the EA Falcon: Australia's Edsel
@Mechknight73 i got an ea s pack and it is immaculate mate the very first ea falcon gl's that came out where rubbish but ford fixed the problems and by 1990 just before the eb falcon came out they had fixed all the problems that you would find in the standered ea gl made in 1988 if you wanna put shit on the ea falcon at least say the gl cause not all ea's where that bad.
@1661992vl You have one of the rarer ones. I've seen problems with them from the GL through to the DA model LTD. It wasn't just the GLs that had problems, and some still had bugs in them in 1990. Those problems thinned out, but the basic ones like wheel alignment required sometimes aftermarket intervention. It was a later model '89 that fried its wiring harness in front of me. This car hadn't had any abuse either; it had been driven sedately
@Mechknight73 yeah i guess i just got lucky with mine but seriously though my ea "s" runs like new and it has 251000 k's on the clock it has no rust and no oil leaks i love the thing my mate said that ea's are shit but when he saw mine he changed his attitude and he is now converted. i hate the way people treat old cars like the vn's and ea's i just think if you treat something the way it was built to be treated then your better off.
@1661992vl I take offence at these dickheads that persist in thinking that because it's old, it doesn't matter if you thrash it. I bought my VN with less than 180,000km on the clock, and other than some minor bodywork, I've had to do very little in the way of repairs. I'm keeping it as a "stealth cruiser;" it can sneak in and out of places without being noticed 90% of the time. Strange thing about Falcon sixes of any era; if you keep tensioning the sump bolts, they rarely leak oil.
@JBofBrisbane They did, but it was what they bolted to that "all new floorpan" that made the difference. 4 wheel discs as standard equipment, for a start.
@sabertooth241 i can agree with you there i have an ea "s" and runs like new plus the heaters in the falcons have really good heaters just love driving it on a cold and rainy day can put the heater on and have some fun in the wet.
The EA Falcon was the worst car ever sold in Australia. Ever.
Every single system on the car would fail - repeatedly. They never even got fixed with age.
Electrical wiring failed, transmission seals, boots would fall off, ECU failed repeatedly, all the parts of the fuel injections, dropped valves, weeping head gaskets, cracked exhaust valves and exhaust valve heads, coked up cylinder heads (a la Mitsubishi)...
@likelysuspectful You know there's something fundamentally wrong when 1. an alloy head for an EA Falcon was a "readily available, off-the shelf" part and 2. from EA to EB, there were over 3300 running changes. Wheel alignments that kept "moving, dodgy gauges, the list just goes on.
@mattb087 With the EA, it was sheer panic. The VL almost took back #1 sales position. Ford knew the new Commodore would be bigger, so they rushed For Australia's Edsel onto the market. This is why the EA is such a lemon
@Paiste402 3600 running changes from EA to EB, and a lot of the fundamental problems still remained. They still leaked oil like a sieve, wallowed around corners like a pig, dodgy gauges and switchgear, and were STILL prone to blowing head gaskets early. VNs had their share of problems, but the VN-VR were still miles ahead of the EA-EF for basic relaibility
no way, ive had several examples of both and the commodores were complete flops. Burning HUGE amounts of fuel, oil loss, trans flaring probems, interiors falling apart, shit electrics and overall not overly powerful. The falcons the exact opposite, sure it had a few switched that didnt work but the rest of the car hummed like singing schoolgirl. Ive got an EB atm and its the best car ive owned by far
@Paiste402 I've towed both, and Ford should have been ashamed of themselves for the EA. I currently own a Series 1 VN, and have owned it for two years. It has done more than 40,000km in that time, and have not had any dud switches, interior panels falling off, burning oil or any of that. Mine can still even pull decent fuel economy. Under abuse conditions, EBs have been little beter than an EA sometimes
Well i do agree the EA was a rush job, and the 3.9 central point was a nightmare. I dunno ive just had alot of shit experiences, same with my mates and the fords have been great
@Paiste402 The irony was that the single point injection engine was less of a nightmare to service. Because of the lack of bonnet height, they wrapped the manifold over the distributor on the mutipoint, which made it a right bastard to work on the distributor. Dunno why it didn't dawn on anybody to put that "ram's horn" shaped manifold they used on the EB straight up
Yea its a fucking nightmare to get to the dizzy's, i put a better one in mine and it was quite hard. But the labour of love haha. But i gotta say the 90's falcons have aged alot better than the commodores. Alot of nice EB's out there, the commodores tend to get the tits thrashed out of them since the spin up easy and are cheap to little 18yr old bogans.
@Paiste402 Mine is one of those that escaped the bogans. It has only had two owners since new, and I have done what I can to improve it. Despite its first owner using it as a "kid shuttle" it has survived well. What I find really firghtening about the EA-ED, is the lack of reinforcement in the body. Seen one burnt to a cinder, and the only metal left was the bonnet, front guards and radiator support
No way the fords have alot more extra metal in them! I thought the VN's were way too thin, thys why they are shit loads lighter and take off like a bullet. But man ur VN sound like my EB, mines only had 2 owners, and elderly man and then a mate of mine and again ive done everything i can to improve it. Cars have souls, if you look after them they look after you! At the worst u just have a dignified failure, not an engine explosion in a city bus lane
@Paiste402 Both my VN and my HZ Kingswood have been two owner cars. The HZ has almost 470,000km on the clock, and although it has terminal rust (the previous owner was an idiot) it will one day return as a one tonner. I bought it for $300 as a tradein at a car yard I worked at, and it has never demanded anything of me. It slept for four years, and woke up as if it were the previous day. Has been fiercely loyal to me, which is why it will become the mother of all custom builds
Oh man old holdens are king. They are indestructible, i had a blue 202 VH that hadnt had a service in 10 years, air filter was solid black, oil was soooo fucked and most of it had hardneded into pure carbon on everything inside. Still went like a little gun, still got great fuel economy, still did little burnouts and is still ticking around today somewhere. And yes after a week of having it i did give it a bloody good service haha
The EA was the better seller but there are a lot more VNs on the road these days, because they didn't start rusting within the first 5 years of their life, had a decent auto gearbox and used a heap less fuel, the wagon didn't have leaf springs, and it had better take-off and a V8 option. The only benefit the Falcon had was their straight six was smoother than the BOP 3800 V6 in the VN, it had a sexier body and stance and the Fairmont Ghia had a nicer interior than the Calais.
@wwoorrdd totally agree man...in the end it doesnt matter both cars are shit!! i used to have a VN and my bro had the EA...we both agree they were as equally shit!!
all new gear in the vn??? based on a vauxhall omega, ageing buick v6, and the same suspension as the vl but tweaked. mmm. oh yeah the CFI 3.9, shit, 4.0 mpfi why they didn't do it in the first place? 2.92 diff killed them a bit too.
@Brikkys COULDNT HAVE SAID IT BETTER MYSELF! Makes me laugh the advertising hype like it 'all Aussie' design.....just a shitbox Vauxhall/Opel adapted to suit Australia. With a shit V6 that is stayed with us until recently...rebranded and tweaked to make it seem 'all new'.
Both were badly made cars with lots of issues. Dungers the pair of them. The VP was a much better car. The EB was a huge improvement on the original EA.
The VN was a much better car. It had a better drivetrain than the Falcon, a much more advanced engine with multipoint injection, more power - better performance, and better suspension / chassis. It also looked more modern at the time, although the EA aged better than the base model VN. Either way, I'd still choose a VN over most Commodores, especially if it were a VN SS...
CFI 3.9 l6 supposedly made 120kw. I remember trying to drive one over a hill and it almost died on me. Didn't think it had the power to get me over the hill. The 3 speed was clunky as fuck too and you could never keep torque on tap. It couldn't even do burnouts. Just a laggy, slow, soggy piece of shit. Worst car that I've ever driven... and ive driven some shitters.
i mean as zackly the same as @scrfce123 mate so there you got, just face it the EA was a pice of shit! dont even know why they made it in the first place
ford wins in my opinion. i have a turbocharged ea fairmont series 2 and ive had it for 6yrs. not a single problem. my mates vn is turbo too and my ea smokes it
Are you for real? Might want to look that up, the EA Falcons 3.9 MPEFI I6 engine (139kW) made more power then the VN Commodres V6 (125 kilowatt). Then in the EB, the EB XR6 made 161kW out of the 4.0L I6 - so please tell me how you worked out that the VN engines made more power, hahaha
I was talking about the original EA fitted with the CFI 3.9 l6 which made 120 KW, not the Multi-point... Besides, out of all
the cars I have driven, the EA has to have been the biggest piece of shit. Even if the MPI 3.9 did have more power than a VN, it didn't have the same power to weight ratio. The EB was a slightly better car than the EA but it was still a friggin boat. The VP was much better than anything Ford made at the time.
"Original EA"? The 3,9 MPFI was available in the EA from day one, it was an option in the GL and standard in the Fairmont Ghia. And like I said, EB XR6 made 161kw out of the 4L I6, how much power did the V6 Commodore of the time make?
The XR6 was Fords top performance model - the Windsor 5.0 was useless in the E series Falcon because it weighed too much without making a heap more power...
Compare apples to apples - VN SS to EB XR6 and you would find that the VN wins hands down.
I am comparing apples to apples, 6 cyl against 6 cyl, the important thing is that the EB XR6 engine is not much different to the EAs engine which you were trying to say was rubbish...
Even though EA and EB suffered from corrosion in cyl heads and regularly blew head gaskets, I'm not going to say that Fords 3.9 liter engines were to blame for EA's shortcomings. All I am saying is that the VN Commodore was a better all round performer than the EA. I've owned a VN and I also drove an EA Falcon for half a year... The VN was much better to drive. By mid 90's ford caught up. The EF > were great cars and the EL XR6 was a bit of a beast.
They may have been similar (the interior courtesy light on certain models was the same part in both cars!), but their 6's were different (Holden having a 3.8L OHV V6, Ford having a 3.2 or 3.9 OHC straight-6)
As for the EA Falcon coming to market early - it did not help for Ford that Wheels Magazine printed photos of the EA in June 1985 of the end product years before it hit the market! (Modern Motor at that time curiously had pencil drawings that looked exactly how the end product looked)
Contrary to what the presenter said, the VN was not all-new - the platform it was built upon was basically the VL's one widened (the front track was the same) - while the side body took elements of the Opel Senator and Omega of the time... As for the V6 engine, it was a redesign of a unit GM in the US had been using since the 1960s - it was a powerful (for the time) yet economical engine though...
That whole which is better ford and holden debate is a fucking joke.Those dickheads who only stick to one brand are fuckheads.You know what its a tie ford and holden both make shit cars.I wouldnt been seen dead buying one of those unreliable pieces of shit that losses value by the hour.That is why brands like toyotas know how to make descent cars ie auntie owned a 84 camry for 20 years and drove it into the ground.Were as pop owned an ea head gasket blew at 80k's.
so you're saying you would rather drive a reliable car that is slow as shit... looks like shit... feels like shit than have a car that sounds decent, looks decent and goes decent but has an issue now and then? Hey... its your choice mate.
People drive Fords and Holdens because they want to.
With regards to cars similar to mine losing value by the hour, what a load of shit. My car is 18 years old and it's still worth 45% of its' new car price. Show me a 5 year old camry that's still worth 45% of it's new car price after 5 years, let alone 18 years.
And about your pop, perhaps he drove / drives like an idiot. Let me rephrase that, maybe he doesn't know how to drive.
ok fuckhead you clearldy dont know what your talking about.People buy fords and holdens because there dumb shits,japs have proven to build better cars over the years compared to aussie built cars.Your bullshitting theres no way your shitty vn ss is worth 45% of its value.But compared to a run of the mill falcon or commodore the camry holds its value alot better.Btw fuckhead my pops had his licence for over 50 years and has never had an accident and looked after that car extremely well.ea r shit.
To the dickheads in the motoring press the VN was awsome and the EA was a dog but out in the real world the EA has aged better the the VN Daewoo Senator.
My mid 1988 Peter Brock special still drives great for a 20 year old,its no concourse trailer queen either,the Australian made motor sounds sweet and kicks the ass of that American Buick boat anchor.
hey mate how any k's ur vn done and is it the 3.8 or the 5l, one of my mates got a vn wagon and its done 535,000ks and still running strong, well it keeps up with my brothers vy commodore ute on worries a tall
load of BS that is, the AU yeah but they came back with the BA and that has turned the tides. Holden have only caught up wid the VE 4 years after the BA was released. FG n VE are great cars but still Ford has the upper hand but just slightly.
the Falcon EA made same power output for a GL EA, but had over 40-50Nm more torque than crappy buick derived holden. Falcon all the way! at least from EAII to BFII and FG in my book. 3.8L commodore was the worst car ever, oil leaks, overheating, poor torque delivery, tendency to lack low end torque, no real overtaking capability etc etc
Are you daft? The VN isn't Buick derived, it just has a Buick engine. The platform is lifted from the Opel Omega A.
The EA falcon had more problems, even straight up, hence why the VN sold so well straight off the bat.
There are far more surviving road-going VNs than EAs, I think that this actually proves which is the better car. Good luck finding an EA in good condition.
The GMV6 wasn't exactly a FWD motor. Sure it ended up in a few FWD cars but that doesn't mean anything, plenty of engines have ended up in both, SR20, CA20, CA18, 4AG, GM3800, Rover K series... Also, Check out the Buick Regal GNX, FR Grand Tourer platform with a Buick 3800 just before the VN came on the scene.
I have an EA S-pack. In really good condition. It's going through car menopause because it's 21 years old, as most 21 year old cars do. They have a tendancy to blow head gaskets at around the 80,000k mark, but after that they just run for ever on a new reinforced head.
Yeah, I've been doing a lot of work on Falcons lately, once you rebuild the top end they're fine for another 100,000km. :) Great bottom end on those motors.
However I gotta say manual transmission for ~EA and ~VN goes a long way in terms of avoiding problems.
I drive a AU taxi 810,000 k's so far with no dramas except for a minor oil leak at 550K
A well mantained 4.0 ltr can do at least 1 mill+,I know of 1 that did 1.3mill in a EL motor never out of car,no head work either but the bloke told me that was nothing,he had a EB that did 1.5!
My EA Brock special has done a low 303Kwith its original 3.9(just about run in now)with 5 speed of course,auto's are for taxis.
a place i used to work for had old taxis come in and 90% were falcons they had some issues with lpg and the v6 engine so many didnt choose them however the ones that did with a good diet and plenty of tlc and regular checks as we all should do they ran out to 600k plus with usual issues like radiators trannys diffs brakes power steerings every bush in sight and now they say the new v6 is better equipped for gas then the olders ones
The newer V6 is a lot better than the old for sure.I don't know why they had problems with gas but the taxi owners love their I6.The old AU I drive has now got 821k on the clock,I predict when it is retired in October it'll have at around 860 on it,then swap over to a BFII with a mere 59k on the clock,I will be interested to see if its as good as the AUII has been.
pffff mate what a load of horse shitt, how many k's could ya get out of an old dog box EA or the BF (BITCH FORD????? because my mate got 535,000ks out of their 1988 vn wagon, and had it since new and its still running strong, it keeps up with my brothers vy s ute on worries a tall
lol....and both cars in the long run were virtually only useable for going around the block to see if they were working, in most cases they proabably were not anyways.
Kylie minogue starting out, crocodile dundee 2 making australia popular in the US, expo 88, the royal family visits, the government and the people who died that year.
omg the vn looks fkn ugly with is plastic rims
aurnob 4 months ago
Well I disagree with the "bogan" comments.
The VN got the same fuel economy as the Camry but was vastly more powerful (okay the interior went a bit squidgy with age and ring life was disappointing (about 170k) - but this wouldnt affect a new buyer).
The 3.9L EA "Super Pursuit" was a grade A dog.
The "Pacer" with a 3.2, a 3 speed auto and TBI was much more reliable, although the body problems still existed.
The 4.0L "EA II" had most of the problems fixed - but more fuel consumption.
lkPractical90 5 months ago 2
VN POWER!
sebstenator 7 months ago
Falcon = win
theboxmike 8 months ago
My parents had a VN wagon "SES pack special" , best car they ever had until our VT
SonofthePhantom 9 months ago
ea falcon was epic
DragonRising88 9 months ago
VN Calais are imported to Thailand
streesmut70 9 months ago
picked up a VN sedan 100% stock for $1988 with heaps of reg, RWC n on road costs from a dealer today. Its been a round since 1988 I figure if it gives about 3 years more of motoring then Ill have no complaints. Apart from the typical clear coat peal its straight n clean
ugslug 10 months ago
They were both crap cars
granthamboy85 1 year ago
What a dark era that was for cars...quality and looks were at an all-time low. The EA was a boat with a head gasket made of cheese, and the VN was about as refined as the people that are driving them these days.
sparky8619 1 year ago 4
haha the VN commodore, a bogans love
MrGrog88 1 year ago
@MrGrog88 lol
spasticarab201 6 months ago
holden commodores are rubbish.
the 1980's and 90's ford falcons and holden commodores had alot of problems with them.
shaftkilla 1 year ago
Which proved to be the more popular of the two? Both are good looking cars. Both are made in Australia, which helps. If I were living in Australia, or even just visiting, which should I buy? The Holden Commodore or the Ford Falcon?
Seattlecarnut 1 year ago
@Seattlecarnut hey mate ea s packs they are the best
1661992vl 1 year ago
@Seattlecarnut Sales figures spoke for themselves; the EA Falcon lost the race because they had huge problems. Had they spent a few more months on R&D, they could have saved themselves a whole lot of trouble. Also, Ford didn't take the hint and release a V8 model unil long after Holden introduced its new fuel injected V8
Mechknight73 8 months ago
@Mechknight73 That makes sense. You build a car like poo (shit), people won't want to buy your cars.
Seattlecarnut 8 months ago
@Mechknight73 The VN was spinning crankshaft bearings like it was going out of fashion. Go to any holden dealership at the time and you would have seen stuffed engines a plenty on the workshop floor. Compared to the EA doing the occasional head gasket. Hardly a comparison. The 3.8 was a 30 y/o engine already when the commodore was released. At least the 4.0l ford was an Australian engine, and is still at the top as far as aussie sixes are concerned.
bbbcreations 6 months ago
@bbbcreations are you sure that you know what your on about ??
MrCrowart 5 months ago
@bbbcreations 'the occasional head gasket' At Thompson Ford in Parramatta,NSW.They where replacing 4 out of 10 heads on cars within the first 6 months of warranty. A new design engine which had virtually the same crank,rods and oil pump from the XY 250.Even the bore centers where kept the same to save costs on tooling.It was new Cheap and nasty design.VN spun cam bearings because some weren't given enough bearing clearance.Those failures where less than 1% of production.
aussiepaul44 1 month ago
I like holdens but outta these two I'd take the falcon haha those old e series falcons have around 140kw at the wheels
GhettoDynamiczInc 1 year ago
@GhettoDynamiczInc However, you forget the long list of problems with the EA; head gaskets blowing at 50,000km, unable to hold a wheel alignment, oil leaks from everywhere, suspect wiring (have seen one almost catch fire with my own eyes) even dodgier cornering, and untrustworthy instruments. The VNs had their problems, but nowhere near as many long-term as the EA Falcon: Australia's Edsel
Mechknight73 1 year ago
@Mechknight73 i got an ea s pack and it is immaculate mate the very first ea falcon gl's that came out where rubbish but ford fixed the problems and by 1990 just before the eb falcon came out they had fixed all the problems that you would find in the standered ea gl made in 1988 if you wanna put shit on the ea falcon at least say the gl cause not all ea's where that bad.
1661992vl 1 year ago
@1661992vl You have one of the rarer ones. I've seen problems with them from the GL through to the DA model LTD. It wasn't just the GLs that had problems, and some still had bugs in them in 1990. Those problems thinned out, but the basic ones like wheel alignment required sometimes aftermarket intervention. It was a later model '89 that fried its wiring harness in front of me. This car hadn't had any abuse either; it had been driven sedately
Mechknight73 1 year ago
@Mechknight73 yeah i guess i just got lucky with mine but seriously though my ea "s" runs like new and it has 251000 k's on the clock it has no rust and no oil leaks i love the thing my mate said that ea's are shit but when he saw mine he changed his attitude and he is now converted. i hate the way people treat old cars like the vn's and ea's i just think if you treat something the way it was built to be treated then your better off.
1661992vl 1 year ago
@1661992vl I take offence at these dickheads that persist in thinking that because it's old, it doesn't matter if you thrash it. I bought my VN with less than 180,000km on the clock, and other than some minor bodywork, I've had to do very little in the way of repairs. I'm keeping it as a "stealth cruiser;" it can sneak in and out of places without being noticed 90% of the time. Strange thing about Falcon sixes of any era; if you keep tensioning the sump bolts, they rarely leak oil.
Mechknight73 1 year ago
@GhettoDynamiczInc
Well they don't they have a smidge over 100 at the wheels, with 124 to 148 kw peak power at the fly.
smithythefierce 1 year ago
Didn't the "all-new" VN have the VB to VH floorpan but just widened at the edges to fit under the new body?
JBofBrisbane 1 year ago
@JBofBrisbane They did, but it was what they bolted to that "all new floorpan" that made the difference. 4 wheel discs as standard equipment, for a start.
Mechknight73 1 year ago
i love my 89 ea "s" 5sp i beat the shit out of it every day and still pur's like a kitten
sabertooth241 1 year ago 2
@sabertooth241 i can agree with you there i have an ea "s" and runs like new plus the heaters in the falcons have really good heaters just love driving it on a cold and rainy day can put the heater on and have some fun in the wet.
1661992vl 1 year ago
haha i brought a vn commodore at about 1989 right out of the factory
0166882 1 year ago
Totaly agree with the previous comment 100% rubbish.
pugpoo 1 year ago
The EA Falcon was the worst car ever sold in Australia. Ever.
Every single system on the car would fail - repeatedly. They never even got fixed with age.
Electrical wiring failed, transmission seals, boots would fall off, ECU failed repeatedly, all the parts of the fuel injections, dropped valves, weeping head gaskets, cracked exhaust valves and exhaust valve heads, coked up cylinder heads (a la Mitsubishi)...
likelysuspectful 1 year ago
@likelysuspectful You know there's something fundamentally wrong when 1. an alloy head for an EA Falcon was a "readily available, off-the shelf" part and 2. from EA to EB, there were over 3300 running changes. Wheel alignments that kept "moving, dodgy gauges, the list just goes on.
Mechknight73 1 year ago
@likelysuspectful
My parents used one as our family car for 6 years and not a single major problem...
LouieTheGamer 7 months ago
The most overrated commodore made
titin200 1 year ago
hahaa cough cough
4runnerakadougy 1 year ago
It wasn't completely new. The VN shared Pillars from the European Opel, and the V6 in them was derived from a 1950 something model Buick.
In anycase, if it was completely 'New', it wouldn't have the odd Ímperial' bolt on the engine, Australia uses Metric.
ozzybungle 1 year ago
ea eb and ed falcons look to ugly and square.
ef and el where so much better than ea eb ed and au
collingwoodrules 1 year ago
fuck knows what ford was thinking when they released the xf-eb, square box?
mattb087 1 year ago
@mattb087 With the EA, it was sheer panic. The VL almost took back #1 sales position. Ford knew the new Commodore would be bigger, so they rushed For Australia's Edsel onto the market. This is why the EA is such a lemon
Mechknight73 1 year ago
EA had 20kw more power and fairmont ghia no calis had the luxuary of a ghia
fpvshitsonhsv 1 year ago
VNs never die.
BAs are already rusting.
RAFFIZUMZ 1 year ago
@RAFFIZUMZ
lol VN's were shitheaps from the get go, and the EA was shit as well. But the EB changed that
Paiste402 1 year ago
@Paiste402 3600 running changes from EA to EB, and a lot of the fundamental problems still remained. They still leaked oil like a sieve, wallowed around corners like a pig, dodgy gauges and switchgear, and were STILL prone to blowing head gaskets early. VNs had their share of problems, but the VN-VR were still miles ahead of the EA-EF for basic relaibility
Mechknight73 1 year ago
@Mechknight73
no way, ive had several examples of both and the commodores were complete flops. Burning HUGE amounts of fuel, oil loss, trans flaring probems, interiors falling apart, shit electrics and overall not overly powerful. The falcons the exact opposite, sure it had a few switched that didnt work but the rest of the car hummed like singing schoolgirl. Ive got an EB atm and its the best car ive owned by far
Paiste402 1 year ago
@Paiste402 I've towed both, and Ford should have been ashamed of themselves for the EA. I currently own a Series 1 VN, and have owned it for two years. It has done more than 40,000km in that time, and have not had any dud switches, interior panels falling off, burning oil or any of that. Mine can still even pull decent fuel economy. Under abuse conditions, EBs have been little beter than an EA sometimes
Mechknight73 1 year ago
@Mechknight73
Well i do agree the EA was a rush job, and the 3.9 central point was a nightmare. I dunno ive just had alot of shit experiences, same with my mates and the fords have been great
Paiste402 1 year ago
@Paiste402 The irony was that the single point injection engine was less of a nightmare to service. Because of the lack of bonnet height, they wrapped the manifold over the distributor on the mutipoint, which made it a right bastard to work on the distributor. Dunno why it didn't dawn on anybody to put that "ram's horn" shaped manifold they used on the EB straight up
Mechknight73 1 year ago
@Mechknight73
Yea its a fucking nightmare to get to the dizzy's, i put a better one in mine and it was quite hard. But the labour of love haha. But i gotta say the 90's falcons have aged alot better than the commodores. Alot of nice EB's out there, the commodores tend to get the tits thrashed out of them since the spin up easy and are cheap to little 18yr old bogans.
Paiste402 1 year ago
@Paiste402 Mine is one of those that escaped the bogans. It has only had two owners since new, and I have done what I can to improve it. Despite its first owner using it as a "kid shuttle" it has survived well. What I find really firghtening about the EA-ED, is the lack of reinforcement in the body. Seen one burnt to a cinder, and the only metal left was the bonnet, front guards and radiator support
Mechknight73 1 year ago
@Mechknight73
No way the fords have alot more extra metal in them! I thought the VN's were way too thin, thys why they are shit loads lighter and take off like a bullet. But man ur VN sound like my EB, mines only had 2 owners, and elderly man and then a mate of mine and again ive done everything i can to improve it. Cars have souls, if you look after them they look after you! At the worst u just have a dignified failure, not an engine explosion in a city bus lane
Paiste402 1 year ago
@Paiste402 Both my VN and my HZ Kingswood have been two owner cars. The HZ has almost 470,000km on the clock, and although it has terminal rust (the previous owner was an idiot) it will one day return as a one tonner. I bought it for $300 as a tradein at a car yard I worked at, and it has never demanded anything of me. It slept for four years, and woke up as if it were the previous day. Has been fiercely loyal to me, which is why it will become the mother of all custom builds
Mechknight73 1 year ago
@Mechknight73
Oh man old holdens are king. They are indestructible, i had a blue 202 VH that hadnt had a service in 10 years, air filter was solid black, oil was soooo fucked and most of it had hardneded into pure carbon on everything inside. Still went like a little gun, still got great fuel economy, still did little burnouts and is still ticking around today somewhere. And yes after a week of having it i did give it a bloody good service haha
I miss old holdens ways
Paiste402 1 year ago
whatever happened to scott lambert?
jeffbrody 1 year ago
The EA was the better seller but there are a lot more VNs on the road these days, because they didn't start rusting within the first 5 years of their life, had a decent auto gearbox and used a heap less fuel, the wagon didn't have leaf springs, and it had better take-off and a V8 option. The only benefit the Falcon had was their straight six was smoother than the BOP 3800 V6 in the VN, it had a sexier body and stance and the Fairmont Ghia had a nicer interior than the Calais.
aussiemick83 1 year ago
Haha these comments rock. Bogans arguing about which shit car is better than the other shit car.
wwoorrdd 1 year ago 16
@wwoorrdd totally agree man...in the end it doesnt matter both cars are shit!! i used to have a VN and my bro had the EA...we both agree they were as equally shit!!
araparap 1 year ago 2
all new gear in the vn??? based on a vauxhall omega, ageing buick v6, and the same suspension as the vl but tweaked. mmm. oh yeah the CFI 3.9, shit, 4.0 mpfi why they didn't do it in the first place? 2.92 diff killed them a bit too.
Brikkys 1 year ago
@Brikkys COULDNT HAVE SAID IT BETTER MYSELF! Makes me laugh the advertising hype like it 'all Aussie' design.....just a shitbox Vauxhall/Opel adapted to suit Australia. With a shit V6 that is stayed with us until recently...rebranded and tweaked to make it seem 'all new'.
Ansett76 1 year ago
Both were badly made cars with lots of issues. Dungers the pair of them. The VP was a much better car. The EB was a huge improvement on the original EA.
pckid888 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
COMMODORES ARE SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!
Check out my page for some facts kids...
FORD BLOKES, Add as freind.
FORD POWER!!
The truth is OUT THERE...
CommodoresROVERATED 2 years ago
The VN was a much better car. It had a better drivetrain than the Falcon, a much more advanced engine with multipoint injection, more power - better performance, and better suspension / chassis. It also looked more modern at the time, although the EA aged better than the base model VN. Either way, I'd still choose a VN over most Commodores, especially if it were a VN SS...
scrfce123 2 years ago
Hahahaha, you're funny, more power, according to who exactly? Do your research before making yourself look like such a goose!
TheMaDDeSTMaN 2 years ago
CFI 3.9 l6 supposedly made 120kw. I remember trying to drive one over a hill and it almost died on me. Didn't think it had the power to get me over the hill. The 3 speed was clunky as fuck too and you could never keep torque on tap. It couldn't even do burnouts. Just a laggy, slow, soggy piece of shit. Worst car that I've ever driven... and ive driven some shitters.
scrfce123 1 year ago
i mean as zackly the same as @scrfce123 mate so there you got, just face it the EA was a pice of shit! dont even know why they made it in the first place
dimmyrocks 1 year ago
i rekon the EA looked to boxy the VN looked more modern 4 back then
HsvKrazy 2 years ago 2
holden kikkkkkk aaaaaaasssssssssssssssssssssssss
mattsrm85 2 years ago 2
there all shit apart from the vn
mattxr6turbo 2 years ago 2
I like holden way more but I think the EA looked a litlle better than the VN.
REPOMAN24722 2 years ago
I think the ea - ed still looks insane
fpvshitsonhsv 2 years ago
ugly fucking model of commodore tho. And after market has proven holden to have as many issues as the EA.
EDXR61993 2 years ago
VN PRIDE
brendoscalais 2 years ago 2
whats there to be proud of lol ???
greatfullfuckingdead 2 years ago 2
ford wins in my opinion. i have a turbocharged ea fairmont series 2 and ive had it for 6yrs. not a single problem. my mates vn is turbo too and my ea smokes it
Fryziemccoy199 2 years ago
I used to have a VN Commodore ex-police V6... let me tell you, that thing was reliable and I greatly miss it when I sold it last year.
st3vo1210 2 years ago
the berlina's were beautiful.. and for the specials, the SS, VN Group A, were stunning.
LOLDISNEYLAND 2 years ago 6
A lot of blokes have gone on about Holden getting all this money off the government.
Soooooo, it's interesting to hear that ford was given $550 MILLION.
That's a shit load more than holden has got.
whingingmuthaphucker 2 years ago
Whinge whinge! Off to tha sick bay!
youandholdenrgay 2 years ago
Blah Blah Blah
whingingmuthaphucker 2 years ago
tell someone who gives a fuck slick
RIPGMH2009 2 years ago
still doing the sook rounds i see hahahahaha
ToGoRightGoHolden 2 years ago
Haaaaa both buckets of shit !!
saltedpeanut2 2 years ago
What? You managed to eat both buckets. Congratulations!!!
RCVNSS 2 years ago
Yeah you would know chump you drive a VN !!
saltedpeanut2 2 years ago
Why are you bragging about eating buckets of shit? loser.
RCV891 2 years ago
You make me laugh, I drive a 1970 HT Monaro 350 a true classic, and your muscle car of choice is a VN SS commodore how cute !!
Now who's the loser ?
Maybe you should go back to the bank, get some real money, to buy a decent muscle car.
saltedpeanut2 2 years ago
VN paintwork was shocking
tizona101 2 years ago
yeah mate that and the roof lining were the bad points about the vn, the vn engines were way in front of then ea tho and had way more power
dimmyrocks 2 years ago
Are you for real? Might want to look that up, the EA Falcons 3.9 MPEFI I6 engine (139kW) made more power then the VN Commodres V6 (125 kilowatt). Then in the EB, the EB XR6 made 161kW out of the 4.0L I6 - so please tell me how you worked out that the VN engines made more power, hahaha
TheMaDDeSTMaN 2 years ago
I was talking about the original EA fitted with the CFI 3.9 l6 which made 120 KW, not the Multi-point... Besides, out of all
the cars I have driven, the EA has to have been the biggest piece of shit. Even if the MPI 3.9 did have more power than a VN, it didn't have the same power to weight ratio. The EB was a slightly better car than the EA but it was still a friggin boat. The VP was much better than anything Ford made at the time.
scrfce123 1 year ago
"Original EA"? The 3,9 MPFI was available in the EA from day one, it was an option in the GL and standard in the Fairmont Ghia. And like I said, EB XR6 made 161kw out of the 4L I6, how much power did the V6 Commodore of the time make?
TheMaDDeSTMaN 1 year ago
The XR6 was Fords top performance model - the Windsor 5.0 was useless in the E series Falcon because it weighed too much without making a heap more power...
Compare apples to apples - VN SS to EB XR6 and you would find that the VN wins hands down.
scrfce123 1 year ago
I am comparing apples to apples, 6 cyl against 6 cyl, the important thing is that the EB XR6 engine is not much different to the EAs engine which you were trying to say was rubbish...
TheMaDDeSTMaN 1 year ago
Even though EA and EB suffered from corrosion in cyl heads and regularly blew head gaskets, I'm not going to say that Fords 3.9 liter engines were to blame for EA's shortcomings. All I am saying is that the VN Commodore was a better all round performer than the EA. I've owned a VN and I also drove an EA Falcon for half a year... The VN was much better to drive. By mid 90's ford caught up. The EF > were great cars and the EL XR6 was a bit of a beast.
scrfce123 1 year ago
I love my 1990 VN Berlina ive had 4 5 years and i wont eva sell it. The ea was a good car, just badly executed
AshtrayI 2 years ago 2
They may have been similar (the interior courtesy light on certain models was the same part in both cars!), but their 6's were different (Holden having a 3.8L OHV V6, Ford having a 3.2 or 3.9 OHC straight-6)
As for the EA Falcon coming to market early - it did not help for Ford that Wheels Magazine printed photos of the EA in June 1985 of the end product years before it hit the market! (Modern Motor at that time curiously had pencil drawings that looked exactly how the end product looked)
joh2 2 years ago
Contrary to what the presenter said, the VN was not all-new - the platform it was built upon was basically the VL's one widened (the front track was the same) - while the side body took elements of the Opel Senator and Omega of the time... As for the V6 engine, it was a redesign of a unit GM in the US had been using since the 1960s - it was a powerful (for the time) yet economical engine though...
joh2 2 years ago
That whole which is better ford and holden debate is a fucking joke.Those dickheads who only stick to one brand are fuckheads.You know what its a tie ford and holden both make shit cars.I wouldnt been seen dead buying one of those unreliable pieces of shit that losses value by the hour.That is why brands like toyotas know how to make descent cars ie auntie owned a 84 camry for 20 years and drove it into the ground.Were as pop owned an ea head gasket blew at 80k's.
67675656565655656565 3 years ago
so you're saying you would rather drive a reliable car that is slow as shit... looks like shit... feels like shit than have a car that sounds decent, looks decent and goes decent but has an issue now and then? Hey... its your choice mate.
OriginalAtomicSheep 2 years ago 2
Holden and Ford make V8s. "Brands like Toyotas" don't. Fullstop.
PanozEsperanteGTR1 2 years ago
PanozEsperanteGTR1
*ahem*
-Toyota 1UZFE
-Nissan VH45DE
-Hyundai TAU V8
thirteenunderscores 2 years ago
Don't forget the VK45DE, 2UZFE...
Also there's the Toyota V12 (I think it's the 1GZZ -- 5.7 litre V12)...
Kajifox 2 years ago
Oh, and I forgot to mention:
-Mitsubishi 8A8
thirteenunderscores 2 years ago
You are the fuckhead.
People drive Fords and Holdens because they want to.
With regards to cars similar to mine losing value by the hour, what a load of shit. My car is 18 years old and it's still worth 45% of its' new car price. Show me a 5 year old camry that's still worth 45% of it's new car price after 5 years, let alone 18 years.
And about your pop, perhaps he drove / drives like an idiot. Let me rephrase that, maybe he doesn't know how to drive.
RCVNSS 2 years ago
ok fuckhead you clearldy dont know what your talking about.People buy fords and holdens because there dumb shits,japs have proven to build better cars over the years compared to aussie built cars.Your bullshitting theres no way your shitty vn ss is worth 45% of its value.But compared to a run of the mill falcon or commodore the camry holds its value alot better.Btw fuckhead my pops had his licence for over 50 years and has never had an accident and looked after that car extremely well.ea r shit.
67675656565655656565 2 years ago
Haha Haha Haha Haha. Boo Hoo.
You definately have a grudge against the world don't you?
What happened, the old man gave you candy to keep quiet did he?
Are you a jap who was molested by an english backpacker?
You'd better get back to polishing your pops...........ykw.
You hide behind your keyboard like a sick paedophile.
Grow up, see your doctor. Better still, do us a favour. Drop dead.
RCV891 2 years ago
To the dickheads in the motoring press the VN was awsome and the EA was a dog but out in the real world the EA has aged better the the VN Daewoo Senator.
My mid 1988 Peter Brock special still drives great for a 20 year old,its no concourse trailer queen either,the Australian made motor sounds sweet and kicks the ass of that American Buick boat anchor.
FordFalconXE351 3 years ago 5
Hang on, what? Daewoo? Where are you getting your information from? And the GM3800 wasn't originally designed as a FWD motor anyway.
thirteenunderscores 2 years ago
hey mate how any k's ur vn done and is it the 3.8 or the 5l, one of my mates got a vn wagon and its done 535,000ks and still running strong, well it keeps up with my brothers vy commodore ute on worries a tall
dimmyrocks 2 years ago
oh i forgot to mention its an 1988 vn wagon and still goes like shit
dimmyrocks 2 years ago
go the fraud faultcon- what a heap
frombris 3 years ago 2
ahaha nice name lol
dimmyrocks 2 years ago
all falcons are the biggest failures ever!!!!!
rollaboy1 3 years ago
load of BS that is, the AU yeah but they came back with the BA and that has turned the tides. Holden have only caught up wid the VE 4 years after the BA was released. FG n VE are great cars but still Ford has the upper hand but just slightly.
keno88 3 years ago
cool
HoldensRockForever 3 years ago
ahhh the vn, the car that inspired a new generation of holden loving bogans.
timmmyj 3 years ago
EA ford do heads and VN where only good with the 5lt as bit to stiff in the front end for the v6
BADGTS 3 years ago
the Falcon EA made same power output for a GL EA, but had over 40-50Nm more torque than crappy buick derived holden. Falcon all the way! at least from EAII to BFII and FG in my book. 3.8L commodore was the worst car ever, oil leaks, overheating, poor torque delivery, tendency to lack low end torque, no real overtaking capability etc etc
AustralianFalconI6 3 years ago
Are you daft? The VN isn't Buick derived, it just has a Buick engine. The platform is lifted from the Opel Omega A.
The EA falcon had more problems, even straight up, hence why the VN sold so well straight off the bat.
There are far more surviving road-going VNs than EAs, I think that this actually proves which is the better car. Good luck finding an EA in good condition.
thirteenunderscores 3 years ago
Early EAs are supposed to be dogs,why in my 300,000klm EA Brock special so reliable?
It isn't Peters touch that made mine good,its the blue oval on the bonnet.
My father had a early series EA as well & it was also very reliable,so go figure?
At least Ford don't use a crappy front wheel drive Yankee Buick donk that sounds like someones thrown a bag of ball bearings in there.
FordFalconXE351 3 years ago
The GMV6 wasn't exactly a FWD motor. Sure it ended up in a few FWD cars but that doesn't mean anything, plenty of engines have ended up in both, SR20, CA20, CA18, 4AG, GM3800, Rover K series... Also, Check out the Buick Regal GNX, FR Grand Tourer platform with a Buick 3800 just before the VN came on the scene.
thirteenunderscores 2 years ago
I have an EA S-pack. In really good condition. It's going through car menopause because it's 21 years old, as most 21 year old cars do. They have a tendancy to blow head gaskets at around the 80,000k mark, but after that they just run for ever on a new reinforced head.
AusBluesMan 2 years ago
Yeah, I've been doing a lot of work on Falcons lately, once you rebuild the top end they're fine for another 100,000km. :) Great bottom end on those motors.
However I gotta say manual transmission for ~EA and ~VN goes a long way in terms of avoiding problems.
thirteenunderscores 2 years ago
I drive a AU taxi 810,000 k's so far with no dramas except for a minor oil leak at 550K
A well mantained 4.0 ltr can do at least 1 mill+,I know of 1 that did 1.3mill in a EL motor never out of car,no head work either but the bloke told me that was nothing,he had a EB that did 1.5!
My EA Brock special has done a low 303Kwith its original 3.9(just about run in now)with 5 speed of course,auto's are for taxis.
FordFalconXE351 2 years ago
lolwhat.. put them out of their misery dude.
thirteenunderscores 2 years ago
My AU taxi will be replaced in October at 8 years,it still runs well.
As for my EA the only reason its worth keeping is Crocks signature but its a reliable piece of crap so it'll be around for a few years yet!
FordFalconXE351 2 years ago
a place i used to work for had old taxis come in and 90% were falcons they had some issues with lpg and the v6 engine so many didnt choose them however the ones that did with a good diet and plenty of tlc and regular checks as we all should do they ran out to 600k plus with usual issues like radiators trannys diffs brakes power steerings every bush in sight and now they say the new v6 is better equipped for gas then the olders ones
ToGoRightGoHolden 2 years ago
The newer V6 is a lot better than the old for sure.I don't know why they had problems with gas but the taxi owners love their I6.The old AU I drive has now got 821k on the clock,I predict when it is retired in October it'll have at around 860 on it,then swap over to a BFII with a mere 59k on the clock,I will be interested to see if its as good as the AUII has been.
FordFalconXE351 2 years ago
plenty of people still belive the au is better then the ba maybe not the bf2 but better then the ba
ToGoRightGoHolden 2 years ago
I havn't had a lot of experience with BA's but most of the ones in our fleet seem ok.
The AU is a good old bus,not the best looker,although I don't mind the AU III T series with its stroked 5.6L.
I like the looks of the BA but the BF looks better.
FordFalconXE351 2 years ago
bf should be a better car then the ba yes it doesnt look all that good the au not sure what they were thinking but that 5.6lt is one great engine
not sure on the ba bf looks yet? from behind they are the same its more the front change like a vy vz change
ToGoRightGoHolden 2 years ago
pffff mate what a load of horse shitt, how many k's could ya get out of an old dog box EA or the BF (BITCH FORD????? because my mate got 535,000ks out of their 1988 vn wagon, and had it since new and its still running strong, it keeps up with my brothers vy s ute on worries a tall
dimmyrocks 2 years ago
mate id go look at the taxis there foing over a mill with orig Motors and everything go look up your info
MedalForces 2 years ago
lol....and both cars in the long run were virtually only useable for going around the block to see if they were working, in most cases they proabably were not anyways.
aussieeagle2512 3 years ago
Is there anything about video games on this tape? Like the release of the nes or anything?
EliteVideoGamer 3 years ago
nah man. wish there was.
pelepollo 3 years ago
k, thanks. Do you know what else they talk about on this tape?
EliteVideoGamer 3 years ago
Kylie minogue starting out, crocodile dundee 2 making australia popular in the US, expo 88, the royal family visits, the government and the people who died that year.
pelepollo 3 years ago
Lol - the approach of the in-car flatscreen TV hadn't really been thought of by the product planners at Holden and Ford at that time!
joh2 2 years ago
Check out the narrow VL track on the VN. What a failure those cars were.
Memphis35 3 years ago
Wher is this guy now?
TheAtraxRobustus 3 years ago
classic
thebassetthound 3 years ago