@charlie29321 God is an idea; such a powerful idea. God is real because we created him. He is the idea of absolute peace and understanding. God gave us everything because the idea of god let humans feel safe while they built the world, the idea gave us the feeling that there is one all knowing force looking after them. God is intangible and invisible because he is not real. I hope soon enough we will not need the idea of god; and that we will have enough faith in humanity to make us feel s
@charlie29321 Only you can answer this question, God is like ummm say quantum physics or any advance physics subject, it's very abstract beacuse we dont apply it in our daily lives, but once we study it and expirience it we began to understand it more and more, same is with God. Once you get to know "him" "it" etc, you'll know "what it is"
@breaneainn also you might want to be ready to use google and other sources to make what your reading even more clearer. if you can find legitimate sources that contradict that book then please do show me how the person is wrong. but to prove someone wrong you have to know what they are saying first.
I believe in Allah. Believing means to "keep faith in something not supportd by concrete evidence." U don't say that u believe in gravity, because there is gravity. Its like, if some1 accuses your dad of stealing,& u don't have evidence 2 prove him innocent but u know from inside dat he can't do it *. IN SHORT "U BELIEVE," WE ALL R BELIEVERS IN SOMEWAYS OR THE OTHER & THAT IS IT.
* he might prove out to be guilty but dat doesn't mean that mankind shuns believing.
This is such bullshit... Anyone else get the idea that the people who think up this shit don't actually have a fucking clue about what atoms are really made of?
There is also an extreme error in Atoms. An atom contains only 1 Proton and 1 Neutron.. The Proton contains a certain Octave or Vibration. The Neutron surrounds the Proton and acts as a controller sending the octave outward to the Electron. The electrons are composed of 100 ultimatoms in the shape of a sphere and join the atom having the first electron entering the outer orbit and as each orbit becomes full, then gather in the next inward orbit. Theres far more but no room to post
humans is the very precised sample of a universe/god living in a flesh. universe in not conscious it only reacts in a consistent basis. GOD/UNIVERSE RELIGION/SCIENCE is the same. dont debate between religion/science synthesize both. its the same but just diff point of view. Science=technology to make a better living/ Religion=to obtain peace and love and avoid transgressions.try to reconcile and make earth a better place.(dont define love in the dictionary define love in the bible. peace =)
This is awesome, lol u think this is hard to wrap ur head around. Check out information on the CERN -LHC, Monday they released information on holding anti-matter for nearly 15min, allowing for it to hit a ground charge in an electromagnetic field. Sounded sweet, anti-hydrogen atoms exist.. don't the rest then?
Could the difference between quantum and classical physics be because quantum physics represents the passage of time itself?
This theory is based on just two postulates,
1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time or Arrow of Time photon by photon.
2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event.
I just don't get it... sorry for the n00by question... Electron and Proton have opposite charges... what happens if they collide? I suppose it doesn't happen in nature but if we made a proton and electron collide what kind of reaction would happen? Thanks!
@GShock112 Nothing would happen. An electron is immutable (non-breakable). A proton is made a few quarks held together by gluons. If I am wrong, show me a research paper or some source.
They make proton vs proton collision because there's more matter to be studie, the electron is a very small particle but what happens if you strip off an electron and make it collide with a proton? Wouldn't it be easier considering the charges attract each other? The electron wouldn't break? And with proton vs proton, the fragments of the collision are radioactive?
@GShock112 Oh, I guess you mean inside accelerators. If the energies are high enough, then transformations do occur between a proton-electron collision. Since the electron is a lepton, it doesn't break apart but due to high energies, it can transform along with the proton into other particles. You can read about that.
does this mean that gravity waves would also bequantized and hence though very week all mass has them and wouldnt this cause a slightly higher acceleration due to gravity orbitals? masses jumping between them only there so close togethor that any mass falling through the gravitation potential would experience multiple orbital jumps. these jumps will acceerate said mass ever so slighly.would this not account for the misterious accelerations felt by the pioneer spacecraft and other satilites
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it - Max Planck
how far down does the rabbit hole go? this is not a question i simply stole from the matrix. i'm simply questioning how strange does the universe have to get. quantum mechanics, string theory, the holographic principle, and the mysterious black holes. so i genuinely pose this question once more: HOW FAR DOWN DOES THE RABBIT HOLE GO?
I'm making short comedy skit videos and am partial towards physics and math humor. I'm going around to popular physics/math videos promoting to try to find a crowd that can understand the jokes. If you have some time please check out my channel and the video subatomic particle party. Thanks for your time.
@colourfulwithaU Some causation derived from correlation ARE logical fallacies
But not necessarily this one.
But in any case, lets not digress.
Lets stick to the heart of the matter my friend.
I've sent you a link.
For the sake of clarity, I'll point out that I've believed in & understood evolution since I was around 9 years old & on. So I wholeheartedly support the theory of evolution. (As well as the Big Bang etc)
See what Dawkins says, especially from 2:13 to 2:55!!
For many religion is an easy option, like water flowing around a rock. You don't have to have your own opinion, you can simply believe what others have told you. Science is very visible. If you really want to understand something you can read about it and if necessary repeat experiments (although it may well take a lot of study). As the math can get pretty complex and not everybody can get to grips with it, well it's a lot easier to say some diety or another was responsible.
did anyone ever calculated the speed of an electron and if they did, how fast and if it is diffrent for diffrent elemnt,also if it is faster than an electron jumping to higher state of chareg or lower state of charge?
I am not sure if the formola I got workes or not is it correct way of calculating the speed also reduction or increasing the speed could cause and create new particales,or reversing pollarities could cause diffrent reaction or formation? finaly if speed of light is also relative?
Jax you best hope you never have to leave your home and live without electricity otherwize you better hope your quantum physics will save your ass without rule of law sounds scary, people don't know everything and pall we don't know shit go try some dmt or somthing
@helixusion Because discussions like this undermine many people's religious beliefs and often makes them verbally aggressive. Of course, the people who feel most threatened by scientific discussions (on either side of the discussion) are the most aggressive and that is very sad really.......................If only they could see that it's their own lack of confidence in their beliefs that creates this response..............
Yeah , thats easy to say that religion is just a belief system , well so is science.
the problem with so called science is it's a false belief that it can predict a future outcome based on the observed data set , and the observed data set according to science , doesn't even exist except as a belief in the mind.
in defense of religion , it's a wise belief that simply states that humans are fools who think they know what will happen based on a guess , which is correct.
@azkeyz I can predict that if I start the engine of a car, it will be able to drive, thanks to a model that science gave me. Your religion just speculates, without being able to show that what it thinks is true. Science is based on facts, if we predict something, and it turns out to be false, we know we're wrong and we adapt. Religion doesn't change, because it doesn't listen to facts. You're typing on a computer knowing that the message will be read by others: you trust science.
@nelippez That's OK! We have no book that tells us gay people are evil. You can kneel down in the night for whatever activity you like. As long as it is consentual, and preferably not under the stright light. Try to find a less public location.
i disagree that anything is deferent from anything else because humans do think but a lot of them think for them selfs. There is a big gap between subjective and objective and saying that science is different from religion is retarded. They are practically identical in the fact that they are both ideologies or human based theories which both have practices used today yes jesus christ did exist = religion and there is also occults or black magic which nowa days= science. WAKE UP
@nelippez - Listen mate -Science and religion are not 'practically identical' because science is not an ideology - i.e. not a belief system. Science gives us expanations of how the world and universe work, by way of observation, evidence and proof-there is no belief just fact - Religion does not explain anything-from what i can see religion provides comfort for those people who can not accept that you only live once. So i would say that science is practically unidentical.
@jax668 Alright then jax ,we have ourselves a dilemma if you know so much about belief systems then maybe you can brush some of us up on quantum mechanics just because two jets knocked down two towers dosn't mean i believe thats what happend but it is most certainly what i saw and dont everyone go getting there panties in a bunch over this
@nelippez - What a strange reply ! - why have we got ourselves a dilemma ? i do not understand ! - can you clarify nelippez - is this reply your counter argument that Religion and Science are still indeed practically identical, in that they are belief systems, because it is not a very persuasive or convincing argument. I think that your misinterpretation of science stems from the second point you made, in your statement in the previous post that i originally replied to - CONTINUED IN NEXT POST
@nelippez - CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST - This is your quote 'They are practically identical in the fact that they are both ideologies or human based theories'
Science is not just about theories - You seem to think that everything that science has to offer is a theory and theories are useless - science is also about discovery and invention - you would not be sending messages on your computer if it was not for the discovery of the electron and the invention of the microprocessor. C NEXT POST
@jax668 i think there is a bigger picture that you have to paint for yourself and maybe more light readying into the history of science..... "Science is but a perversion of itself unless it has, as the ultimate goal the betterment of humanity."
@nelippez - I'm not being funny mate - but what on earth are you talking about now - when two people enter into a debate you are meant to answer by argueing against or agree with the statements made - you are doing neither - you seem to jump from one statement to the next - what has your post got to do with what i have just said - now Nelippez - you need to clarify your posts to refer to what i have said in my posts or forget that i posted anything - because this is becomming tiring now.
@jax668 well jax666 im a sort of pacifist and arguing over the internet is like winning the special olympics. Even if you win you are still retarded. now thats funny but still if you want to argue with me lets do it in person it has more meaning that way and its the more human thing to do im sorry for not making any points but what do have left after faceless words and trying to have serious conversations over a lit screen
@nelippez I didn't realize earlier on, but you are right. With regard to skills in clear, concise, coherent debating, you would probably be a contestant in the special olympics. It is extremely inconsiderate of us, wanting to do a regular adult debate with you. Sorry, won't happen again.
@nelippez - Last one i promise - now to say that religion is a theory is also incorrect - a theory is the highest form of explanation that science has, it is an analytical tool for understanding, explaining and making predictions about a given subject - there is no belief here - when angular momentum theory predicts the next solar eclipse - we do not believe it is going to happen - we know it is going to happen - there is a huge difference - religion is a belief system - Science is not.
While that sounds good it is based on a logical fallacy. Even if say, particle x has done y every time at event E, it is logically fallacious to infer it will do so in the future. That's not to say we cannot have a good amount of certainty of physical functioning in the universe, we do. However, future physical functions will always be a belief no matter how many times it has done so in the past.
@jax668 That's incorrect. Science uses theories because it is NOT the absolute rule of the universe. There could always be something around the corner to prove a theory wrong, which is why they are not called laws. The reason religion is not a theory is because those who beleive in it take it as the final answer to the universe, they believe religion is law.
@Turmoil90 As you please. Examples of scientific theories: Theory of gravity, theory of electromagnetism, theory of relativity, etc... For example the theory of gravity. A theory is a general name for a specific domain in science which has pretty much been sorted out to a point beyond reasonable doubt. Newton's LAW of gravity is only a small subset of the THEORY of gravity. It is just how scientists name things. A theory is the best we've got, it has nothing to do with opinion or subjectiveness.
@jax668 Religion is faith. Sometimes with evidence that supports it. It may or may not be true, but it's supporters believe that it is infallible. Science is based a bit on faith, (We have faith that atoms exist) but mostley on evidence. Both are necessary.
@breaneainn you carry your dictionary and read the book i suggested. for it uses allot of science, astronomy, physics... pretty much the entire spectrum we rely on to define reality. so once again.. "a case for creator" by lee strobel (i was a full blown atheists)..from a former atheist to present one... read the dam book and you will be elated and surprised) you cannot know if you do not look for yourself. how do you know if you do not look? the answer is you CANNOT know if you DO NOT LOOK.
@tonyproia1 Far-out. One book changed your mind? Doubt you'll be picked for jury duty if you are that easily swayed. I'm familiar with Lee Strobels arguments, compelling and well structured like any other, and the core point is the fine tuning dilemma. REAL scientists admit to not knowing, but work hard all their lives to find out. Psudo-scientific creationist apologists fill the answer box with god first, then cherry pick science to back-engineer the arguments to justify their answer.
In the new sciences we are discovering and thier implications such as quantum mechanics, the idea of 'god' creating the universe doesnt seem so crazy. Both the genesis theory and the big bang theory present scientific models of how the universe was created. One has no reason to support one theory over the other without eveidence. It just so happens that there is a ton of evidence to support the big bang theory, but the genisis theory cant be COMEPLETLY disproved, from an unbias point of view
@Daavoid Big bang theory has evidence, microwave leftovers, the fact that galaxies are STILL parting from each other, and the inflation theory only makes things more simple for scientists to prove that matter can be created out of 'virtually' nothing.
Genesis is wrong on so many things and cannot be taken scientifically, it's prone to interpretation and offers no evidence other than a book. You can't consider scientific a book that says the universe and all living thing came to be in six days.
@Razgrits Personaly, i total agree, i think genisis is completley wrong, all im saying, is from a total unbias point of view, all theorys have to be taken into acount(unitl disproved), i was just using genisis as an example
@Daavoid Everything religious can be considered only as a hypothesis if you want to speak scientifically. And I am VERY generous to place 'god' as a hypothesis. So no, Genesis shouldn't be taken into account because it's not even a theory, the big bang is a theory so yeah, it's by far more likely to be true. My own position is unbiased, because if I start taking into account information from religious books I might as well say the earth sits on pillars.
@WOWFPS yeh i agree with you, i was just sort of looking at how theorys are formed, dont get me wrong, i dont believe in religion, it is the number1 cause of pain and suffering in the world.
@WOWFPS Tell me how it can be proved! Were you there? Did you see it? Did someone who was there see it and tell you about it? The big bang theory.. what a joke, no evidence, no one was there, no one saw it.
If were going to talk about God then i will. God was there, obviously, he made the whole universe! Then he made Adam, who passed down the story of creation which he heard from God, to his children. Thats the story of the book of Genesis
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Find a motor that needs no fuel or input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
Religion is simply a way to ease the mind of those who need it. The only problem with this is that people will not question why. This will lead to believing we already have the answers, so why look for the true answers.
@Davidarmo42415 "i noticed that the electron atoms kinda resemble the way planets orbit around the sun. wonder of there is a connection"
Pretty much every characteristic of electrons orbiting in atoms versus planets orbiting the sun is completely different. Your mental image of them may look similar but possibly the only common aspect of the two things is that they are mostly empty.
I think Religion stands on a more, big picture type of thing while science is small, and big picture, science explains every thing, but with great detail, and evidence supported by even more detail, it tries to explain every thing to its lowest level, kinda like solving for X. While Religion try's to explain everything with one answer, which in not truly provable or disprovable as far as we know.
But this is only what i am believing and thinking at this moment.
The bald, computer-animated guy creeps me out, lol, but love the video's. And I love how people throw religion into the topic, when the discussion is about science. If you want to preach, go to church! Leave the search for knowledge and scientific facts to those of us who are willing to open our minds up to the truth...
Seriously, loved the video... Well explained... Good graphics... But your character animation and lips sync almost looks like a live action ken doll scene where the puppet masters are epileptic.
@ekaj777 The only thing we all are is atomic structures. That is, we are all composed of a collection of atoms created during the life and death of distant stars. The idea of god came erroneously from one of these collections of atoms at some time in our remote past and now today, amazingly, there are still collections of atoms such as yourself who can't separate an idea from a fact no matter how much evidence you are given.
A true religion first of all should have signs of physical order to examine and verify its state of truth
And a true religion gives a law of world order to make man not to deviate from order but it will not stop man to think and search research in the field of order
But a wrong religion stops man's thinking and become hurdle for its development and growth
what I have never been able to understand is why people don't get that science and religion (or at least...whatever "god" is) are ONE and the same. We are all one thing...collectively we are "god"...as for proving that...well I guess I just have "faith"
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
People have been believing in a God for at least 5000 years. 400 over hundred generations, concurrently. Sciences shows miracles, miracles show God. This is not some idea that was thought of recently and promoted for completely selfish desires for ultimate power and control. Some day soon you'll see the danger of promoting evolution. I'm not against evolution, for one it would take more faith to agree with this "theory" than religious laws.
Science is not the search for patterns of matter. Science asks questions and tries to find answers whereas religion preaches answers to you and tells you not to ask questions.
I mean in the way religion teaches what it thinks is the whole truth and never thinks 'well maybe we're wrong about this' whereas science always asks itself 'am I wrong?'
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What is energy?? What is an elementary particle?? does it occupy space and have weight as in the traditional sense of matter?? If an atom can be a wave or a particle , what is a wave?? when we keep going backwards trying to define the unknowable by the unknown, what makes science all that different from religion (not that I'm religious) I think the question we should be asking is what do we do with this time on the planet?? Can we make it good and safe for everyone??
The coment dosent have sense. But religion is very diferent from science because in religion the dobut is view as a bad thing and in sciencie as a good thing. That why they are very diferent.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You have to have "FAITH" in the scientists to believe what they say, none of them say the same thing (i.e. regarding origins and what is real) , scientists don't agree, the religious believers don't agree, if noone agrees then WHAT IS TRUTH???? you might as well make it up...
@rickwyant Both science and religion tell a story with different characters. They both live in the imagination of man. The main difference is that the process used in science leads to a story that is very consistent with our human subjective experience. This consistency and coherence is the main difference and enable scientist to do prediction and engineers things that work.
What makes science different from religion? Are you serious? Science is supported by evidence. Religion is dependent on faith. Any rational minded person would lean towards science before religion...
Your belief in science is just as much based on faith as any religionists is... you "believe", have "faith in" what the scientists are telling you.. look around there is so much pseudo science being promoted, other dimensions, time travel, etc. etc... about as believable as gods and souls... supported by evidence?? your all believers thats all, just as nutty as the religionists....go back to sleep now....all of you , dream away....LOL
LMAO. Science is supported by EVIDENCE. They can PROVE what they're saying. Religion is based on faith. Nothing about a god has ever been proven. When you see a scientist prove a theory, you have to be a dumb fuck to be against it...
"When you see a scientist prove a theory, you have to be a dumb fuck to be against it..." What you are saying here is profoundly unscientific. One of the main contrast points between science and religion is that whereas ideas in religion are held as holy and untouchable, ideas in science are open to debate; they can be challenged and absolute certainty is not an option. The ability to question what you think you know to be true is characteristic of the scientific mind.
I'm talking about you specifically. I looked at your comments on other videos. You use that word a lot. Can you think of any synonyms? Dramatic, perhaps?
Religion bothers me because it has detrimental effects on people's minds and on the world. It is a serious problem, and when a serious problem bothers you, ignoring it is not the best option.
@colourfulwithaU Oh give it a rest. The first time I "used that word" as you say was talking to you. I used it again when talking to another bunch of Americans later, so don't over-egg the pudding! You are one being dramatic, trawling other people's comments on other videos, lol.
Religion bothers you personally. It has a beneficial effect on people;s minds overall
Atheism is also a dangerous & detrimental thing as well as it essentially states that we don't actually exist
So atheism or lack of religion also is seriously detrimental ^ very dangerous.
At *least* religion provides a moral code, whereas in atheism there is no *need* for a moral code.
So investigate that as well.
The problem is not religion or atheism in America. It's your extreme mentality & your propensity to argue about everything in the most extreme way rather than just leaving the other side alone & *ignoring* them!
Wait, atheism "states that we don't actually exist"? "No real morality"? "No need for a moral code"? Where are you getting this fictional nonsense? There is no trait to atheism other than the lack of belief in supernatural deities. How is it dangerous or detrimental? Unlike you, I can provide some specific examples of instances in which religion has directly caused suffering, oppression, and death (which I will do upon request).
This is an old model, the electrons aren't that way
mailbox2223 2 weeks ago
@mailbox2223 wait really? how do electrons behave then?
pfranks44 1 week ago
also the orbitals aren't two dimensional as shown in this video
guitarguy2596 1 month ago
Odd feedback about this video yet again.
ohnniehickm24j 1 month ago
...Safe. God is a placeholder for until we become intelligent enough to care for each other, and become united as a single race.
ffletcherr 1 month ago
@charlie29321 God is an idea; such a powerful idea. God is real because we created him. He is the idea of absolute peace and understanding. God gave us everything because the idea of god let humans feel safe while they built the world, the idea gave us the feeling that there is one all knowing force looking after them. God is intangible and invisible because he is not real. I hope soon enough we will not need the idea of god; and that we will have enough faith in humanity to make us feel s
ffletcherr 1 month ago
@ffletcherr, Once again a rational mind cuts through the bullshit.
pommyrooter 1 month ago
I would like to know what god is. not who, not where, not when, but "what"
charlie29321 2 months ago
@charlie29321 Only you can answer this question, God is like ummm say quantum physics or any advance physics subject, it's very abstract beacuse we dont apply it in our daily lives, but once we study it and expirience it we began to understand it more and more, same is with God. Once you get to know "him" "it" etc, you'll know "what it is"
Flacorcuera 1 month ago
@charlie29321
Check out the website Desteni, under FAQ you will find your answers
egozzini 1 week ago
the guy who comes in the beginning is sort of creepy
sarah29172 2 months ago
this guy doesnt know how to say nucleus
bloodypinksock 2 months ago
@breaneainn also you might want to be ready to use google and other sources to make what your reading even more clearer. if you can find legitimate sources that contradict that book then please do show me how the person is wrong. but to prove someone wrong you have to know what they are saying first.
tonyproia1 2 months ago
it was good but i farted
eatingtacos000 2 months ago
... Who the hell thought the man thing in the beginning was a good idea? O.o
AverageWizard100 3 months ago 2
I watch this 3 times, and I still don't fully understand it. Anyone can help me with this?
Anahit11 4 months ago
I hated missing school and on the day like this shit is being explained X(
TooMuchRacism 4 months ago
whoever made this video has no shame
andrespereyda 4 months ago
I believe in Allah. Believing means to "keep faith in something not supportd by concrete evidence." U don't say that u believe in gravity, because there is gravity. Its like, if some1 accuses your dad of stealing,& u don't have evidence 2 prove him innocent but u know from inside dat he can't do it *. IN SHORT "U BELIEVE," WE ALL R BELIEVERS IN SOMEWAYS OR THE OTHER & THAT IS IT.
* he might prove out to be guilty but dat doesn't mean that mankind shuns believing.
zamilabbas786 4 months ago
who created atom and assigned specific orbits to electrons? COINCIDENCE ?
zamilabbas786 4 months ago
Heathens god is the true answer!!! >:D lol im a christian zealot joking science fo da win
MrBlake004 4 months ago
The reason why you can't determine a particle's location and momentum simultaneously is because they are hiding from Chuck Norris.
p7byrd 5 months ago
@p7byrd I suspect that they are not hiding, but Chuck Norris decides their location and nobody can predict Chuck Norris.
Anawnymous 3 months ago
@Anawnymous SSHHHHH!! Lord Norris will hear your blasphemy you fool! what are you? mental or something?..for norris-sake...
breaneainn 2 months ago
@breaneainn lol
Anawnymous 2 months ago
0:06 - 0:09 ...what the fuck is up with that...man?
TheSejma 5 months ago 2
This is such bullshit... Anyone else get the idea that the people who think up this shit don't actually have a fucking clue about what atoms are really made of?
McTrots 5 months ago
Can't we all just smoke a bong? Jeeeez
olhappyhippy 6 months ago
how do you isolate atoms???????
koolkulitz 6 months ago
Great explanation. but the animated guy looks stupid
ByabyaChannel 7 months ago
There is also an extreme error in Atoms. An atom contains only 1 Proton and 1 Neutron.. The Proton contains a certain Octave or Vibration. The Neutron surrounds the Proton and acts as a controller sending the octave outward to the Electron. The electrons are composed of 100 ultimatoms in the shape of a sphere and join the atom having the first electron entering the outer orbit and as each orbit becomes full, then gather in the next inward orbit. Theres far more but no room to post
johnnyc7491 7 months ago
@johnnyc7491 I'm pretty sure that's wrong
afroman1419 5 months ago
humans is the very precised sample of a universe/god living in a flesh. universe in not conscious it only reacts in a consistent basis. GOD/UNIVERSE RELIGION/SCIENCE is the same. dont debate between religion/science synthesize both. its the same but just diff point of view. Science=technology to make a better living/ Religion=to obtain peace and love and avoid transgressions.try to reconcile and make earth a better place.(dont define love in the dictionary define love in the bible. peace =)
FlavioAngPanday 7 months ago
This is awesome, lol u think this is hard to wrap ur head around. Check out information on the CERN -LHC, Monday they released information on holding anti-matter for nearly 15min, allowing for it to hit a ground charge in an electromagnetic field. Sounded sweet, anti-hydrogen atoms exist.. don't the rest then?
hcon15 7 months ago
@hcon15 a friend was telling me about that, absolutely fucked with my mind!
justger 7 months ago
Could the difference between quantum and classical physics be because quantum physics represents the passage of time itself?
This theory is based on just two postulates,
1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time or Arrow of Time photon by photon.
2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event.
nickharvey7 7 months ago
What is in the space between subatomic particles?
ExNihiloJimmy 8 months ago
I just don't get it... sorry for the n00by question... Electron and Proton have opposite charges... what happens if they collide? I suppose it doesn't happen in nature but if we made a proton and electron collide what kind of reaction would happen? Thanks!
GShock112 8 months ago
@GShock112 Nothing would happen. An electron is immutable (non-breakable). A proton is made a few quarks held together by gluons. If I am wrong, show me a research paper or some source.
vmelkon 8 months ago
@vmelkon
They make proton vs proton collision because there's more matter to be studie, the electron is a very small particle but what happens if you strip off an electron and make it collide with a proton? Wouldn't it be easier considering the charges attract each other? The electron wouldn't break? And with proton vs proton, the fragments of the collision are radioactive?
GShock112 8 months ago
@GShock112 Oh, I guess you mean inside accelerators. If the energies are high enough, then transformations do occur between a proton-electron collision. Since the electron is a lepton, it doesn't break apart but due to high energies, it can transform along with the proton into other particles. You can read about that.
vmelkon 8 months ago
does this mean that gravity waves would also bequantized and hence though very week all mass has them and wouldnt this cause a slightly higher acceleration due to gravity orbitals? masses jumping between them only there so close togethor that any mass falling through the gravitation potential would experience multiple orbital jumps. these jumps will acceerate said mass ever so slighly.would this not account for the misterious accelerations felt by the pioneer spacecraft and other satilites
jamesmoisson 8 months ago
well i studied almost everything in this video in high school (9th grade) !!
Einstien121 9 months ago
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it - Max Planck
THEFLESHMANN1 9 months ago
Wave particle duality explained
Lucuskane 10 months ago
how far down does the rabbit hole go? this is not a question i simply stole from the matrix. i'm simply questioning how strange does the universe have to get. quantum mechanics, string theory, the holographic principle, and the mysterious black holes. so i genuinely pose this question once more: HOW FAR DOWN DOES THE RABBIT HOLE GO?
FallofDarkness55 10 months ago
WHY?!! Why throw in that guy in the beginning and end!! Sooo freaky!
oth65 10 months ago
Is is possible for gravity to slow down electrons even a tiny fraction of a second?
Please, anyone, respond...
TheAlexander356 10 months ago
I'm making short comedy skit videos and am partial towards physics and math humor. I'm going around to popular physics/math videos promoting to try to find a crowd that can understand the jokes. If you have some time please check out my channel and the video subatomic particle party. Thanks for your time.
BendableCard 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@colourfulwithaU Some causation derived from correlation ARE logical fallacies
But not necessarily this one.
But in any case, lets not digress.
Lets stick to the heart of the matter my friend.
I've sent you a link.
For the sake of clarity, I'll point out that I've believed in & understood evolution since I was around 9 years old & on. So I wholeheartedly support the theory of evolution. (As well as the Big Bang etc)
See what Dawkins says, especially from 2:13 to 2:55!!
Peace!
KTK401 10 months ago
im learning this now in school its very confusing but after i saw this video thank u it made things clearer
ven2111 11 months ago
That man in the beginning is scaaaaary...
TriKri 11 months ago 41
For many religion is an easy option, like water flowing around a rock. You don't have to have your own opinion, you can simply believe what others have told you. Science is very visible. If you really want to understand something you can read about it and if necessary repeat experiments (although it may well take a lot of study). As the math can get pretty complex and not everybody can get to grips with it, well it's a lot easier to say some diety or another was responsible.
JurassicPlank 11 months ago
really well-made, fascinating videos.
lestatsdarlingdes 11 months ago
did anyone ever calculated the speed of an electron and if they did, how fast and if it is diffrent for diffrent elemnt,also if it is faster than an electron jumping to higher state of chareg or lower state of charge?
I am not sure if the formola I got workes or not is it correct way of calculating the speed also reduction or increasing the speed could cause and create new particales,or reversing pollarities could cause diffrent reaction or formation? finaly if speed of light is also relative?
saharDJAMS 1 year ago
Jax you best hope you never have to leave your home and live without electricity otherwize you better hope your quantum physics will save your ass without rule of law sounds scary, people don't know everything and pall we don't know shit go try some dmt or somthing
nelippez 1 year ago
why would an atom explode if the electron fell into the nucleus?
Pimpmastahanhduece 1 year ago
Which religion talks about structure of atoms?
helixusion 1 year ago
Why the hell are people talking about God out here?
helixusion 1 year ago
@helixusion Because discussions like this undermine many people's religious beliefs and often makes them verbally aggressive. Of course, the people who feel most threatened by scientific discussions (on either side of the discussion) are the most aggressive and that is very sad really.......................If only they could see that it's their own lack of confidence in their beliefs that creates this response..............
mebiggles1 1 year ago
God is not a partical , he's something beyond the realm of particals.
stop listening to godless british scum who think God is a partical.
azkeyz 1 year ago
@azkeyz see what I mean @helixusion?
mebiggles1 1 year ago
@azkeyz Learn at least that it is "particle" and not PARTICAL.
solizanetti 1 year ago
Yeah , thats easy to say that religion is just a belief system , well so is science.
the problem with so called science is it's a false belief that it can predict a future outcome based on the observed data set , and the observed data set according to science , doesn't even exist except as a belief in the mind.
in defense of religion , it's a wise belief that simply states that humans are fools who think they know what will happen based on a guess , which is correct.
azkeyz 1 year ago
@azkeyz I can predict that if I start the engine of a car, it will be able to drive, thanks to a model that science gave me. Your religion just speculates, without being able to show that what it thinks is true. Science is based on facts, if we predict something, and it turns out to be false, we know we're wrong and we adapt. Religion doesn't change, because it doesn't listen to facts. You're typing on a computer knowing that the message will be read by others: you trust science.
Thunderios 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Best0fScience my msn in profile! Quantum Mechanics: The Structure Of Atoms
sexykatie90 1 year ago
What happens if you drop an atom on a mirror?
natinegga513 1 year ago
lol that guy in the beginning reminds me hitman..
XxDWillxX 1 year ago
Why dose the Vatican have scientists? lighten... up?
nelippez 1 year ago
o by the way any of you so called scientists/satanists figure out how to make gold.
P.S. God is my homie. on my knees in the night saying prays in the street light
nelippez 1 year ago
@nelippez That's OK! We have no book that tells us gay people are evil. You can kneel down in the night for whatever activity you like. As long as it is consentual, and preferably not under the stright light. Try to find a less public location.
henkvanderlaak 1 year ago
@henkvanderlaak We've been spending most our lives
Living in the Gangsta's Paradise....... do you get it know Sherlock
nelippez 1 year ago
i disagree that anything is deferent from anything else because humans do think but a lot of them think for them selfs. There is a big gap between subjective and objective and saying that science is different from religion is retarded. They are practically identical in the fact that they are both ideologies or human based theories which both have practices used today yes jesus christ did exist = religion and there is also occults or black magic which nowa days= science. WAKE UP
nelippez 1 year ago
@nelippez - Listen mate -Science and religion are not 'practically identical' because science is not an ideology - i.e. not a belief system. Science gives us expanations of how the world and universe work, by way of observation, evidence and proof-there is no belief just fact - Religion does not explain anything-from what i can see religion provides comfort for those people who can not accept that you only live once. So i would say that science is practically unidentical.
jax668 1 year ago
@jax668 Alright then jax ,we have ourselves a dilemma if you know so much about belief systems then maybe you can brush some of us up on quantum mechanics just because two jets knocked down two towers dosn't mean i believe thats what happend but it is most certainly what i saw and dont everyone go getting there panties in a bunch over this
nelippez 1 year ago
@nelippez - What a strange reply ! - why have we got ourselves a dilemma ? i do not understand ! - can you clarify nelippez - is this reply your counter argument that Religion and Science are still indeed practically identical, in that they are belief systems, because it is not a very persuasive or convincing argument. I think that your misinterpretation of science stems from the second point you made, in your statement in the previous post that i originally replied to - CONTINUED IN NEXT POST
jax668 1 year ago
@nelippez - CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST - This is your quote 'They are practically identical in the fact that they are both ideologies or human based theories'
Science is not just about theories - You seem to think that everything that science has to offer is a theory and theories are useless - science is also about discovery and invention - you would not be sending messages on your computer if it was not for the discovery of the electron and the invention of the microprocessor. C NEXT POST
jax668 1 year ago
@jax668 i think there is a bigger picture that you have to paint for yourself and maybe more light readying into the history of science..... "Science is but a perversion of itself unless it has, as the ultimate goal the betterment of humanity."
-Nikola Tesla-1919
nelippez 1 year ago
@nelippez - I'm not being funny mate - but what on earth are you talking about now - when two people enter into a debate you are meant to answer by argueing against or agree with the statements made - you are doing neither - you seem to jump from one statement to the next - what has your post got to do with what i have just said - now Nelippez - you need to clarify your posts to refer to what i have said in my posts or forget that i posted anything - because this is becomming tiring now.
jax668 1 year ago
@jax668 well jax666 im a sort of pacifist and arguing over the internet is like winning the special olympics. Even if you win you are still retarded. now thats funny but still if you want to argue with me lets do it in person it has more meaning that way and its the more human thing to do im sorry for not making any points but what do have left after faceless words and trying to have serious conversations over a lit screen
nelippez 1 year ago
@nelippez I didn't realize earlier on, but you are right. With regard to skills in clear, concise, coherent debating, you would probably be a contestant in the special olympics. It is extremely inconsiderate of us, wanting to do a regular adult debate with you. Sorry, won't happen again.
henkvanderlaak 1 year ago
@henkvanderlaak haha its all good man i mean no hate the enterweb intrigues me
nelippez 1 year ago
@nelippez - Last one i promise - now to say that religion is a theory is also incorrect - a theory is the highest form of explanation that science has, it is an analytical tool for understanding, explaining and making predictions about a given subject - there is no belief here - when angular momentum theory predicts the next solar eclipse - we do not believe it is going to happen - we know it is going to happen - there is a huge difference - religion is a belief system - Science is not.
jax668 1 year ago 49
@jax668
While that sounds good it is based on a logical fallacy. Even if say, particle x has done y every time at event E, it is logically fallacious to infer it will do so in the future. That's not to say we cannot have a good amount of certainty of physical functioning in the universe, we do. However, future physical functions will always be a belief no matter how many times it has done so in the past.
-Matt
95TurboSol 10 months ago
@jax668 That's incorrect. Science uses theories because it is NOT the absolute rule of the universe. There could always be something around the corner to prove a theory wrong, which is why they are not called laws. The reason religion is not a theory is because those who beleive in it take it as the final answer to the universe, they believe religion is law.
Turmoil90 8 months ago
@Turmoil90 You're totally right!!!....ermmm no of course you're not. But you're too dumb to realise it..awww
RTRVII 7 months ago
@RTRVII Hey instead of insulting why not explain WHY I'm wrong? I mean, maybe its just me but random insults only show your own ignorance.
Turmoil90 7 months ago
@Turmoil90 As you please. Examples of scientific theories: Theory of gravity, theory of electromagnetism, theory of relativity, etc... For example the theory of gravity. A theory is a general name for a specific domain in science which has pretty much been sorted out to a point beyond reasonable doubt. Newton's LAW of gravity is only a small subset of the THEORY of gravity. It is just how scientists name things. A theory is the best we've got, it has nothing to do with opinion or subjectiveness.
RTRVII 7 months ago
@jax668 religion is a brainwash system eh ;)
MrUberSpanky 5 months ago
@jax668 Religion is faith. Sometimes with evidence that supports it. It may or may not be true, but it's supporters believe that it is infallible. Science is based a bit on faith, (We have faith that atoms exist) but mostley on evidence. Both are necessary.
StrategicGamesEtc 4 months ago
@jax668 Read "A Case for Creator" then argue with me. until then you are wrong. my argument is that book.
tonyproia1 3 months ago
@tonyproia1 Read " The Dictionary" then argue with me. until then you are wrong.
my argument is that book.
breaneainn 2 months ago
@breaneainn you carry your dictionary and read the book i suggested. for it uses allot of science, astronomy, physics... pretty much the entire spectrum we rely on to define reality. so once again.. "a case for creator" by lee strobel (i was a full blown atheists)..from a former atheist to present one... read the dam book and you will be elated and surprised) you cannot know if you do not look for yourself. how do you know if you do not look? the answer is you CANNOT know if you DO NOT LOOK.
tonyproia1 2 months ago
@tonyproia1 Far-out. One book changed your mind? Doubt you'll be picked for jury duty if you are that easily swayed. I'm familiar with Lee Strobels arguments, compelling and well structured like any other, and the core point is the fine tuning dilemma. REAL scientists admit to not knowing, but work hard all their lives to find out. Psudo-scientific creationist apologists fill the answer box with god first, then cherry pick science to back-engineer the arguments to justify their answer.
breaneainn 2 months ago
STFU and be open minded... That's the smartest way.
sherkinou 1 year ago
Is that john locke from Lost?
ZicoCirola 1 year ago
STFU about God and watch the damn video.
Poncho151500 1 year ago
In the new sciences we are discovering and thier implications such as quantum mechanics, the idea of 'god' creating the universe doesnt seem so crazy. Both the genesis theory and the big bang theory present scientific models of how the universe was created. One has no reason to support one theory over the other without eveidence. It just so happens that there is a ton of evidence to support the big bang theory, but the genisis theory cant be COMEPLETLY disproved, from an unbias point of view
Daavoid 1 year ago
@Daavoid Big bang theory has evidence, microwave leftovers, the fact that galaxies are STILL parting from each other, and the inflation theory only makes things more simple for scientists to prove that matter can be created out of 'virtually' nothing.
Genesis is wrong on so many things and cannot be taken scientifically, it's prone to interpretation and offers no evidence other than a book. You can't consider scientific a book that says the universe and all living thing came to be in six days.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Razgrits Personaly, i total agree, i think genisis is completley wrong, all im saying, is from a total unbias point of view, all theorys have to be taken into acount(unitl disproved), i was just using genisis as an example
Daavoid 1 year ago
@Daavoid Everything religious can be considered only as a hypothesis if you want to speak scientifically. And I am VERY generous to place 'god' as a hypothesis. So no, Genesis shouldn't be taken into account because it's not even a theory, the big bang is a theory so yeah, it's by far more likely to be true. My own position is unbiased, because if I start taking into account information from religious books I might as well say the earth sits on pillars.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Daavoid
but the big bang theory CAN be proved, the genisis theory CAN NOT be proved.
WOWFPS 1 year ago
@WOWFPS yeh i agree with you, i was just sort of looking at how theorys are formed, dont get me wrong, i dont believe in religion, it is the number1 cause of pain and suffering in the world.
Daavoid 1 year ago
@WOWFPS Tell me how it can be proved! Were you there? Did you see it? Did someone who was there see it and tell you about it? The big bang theory.. what a joke, no evidence, no one was there, no one saw it.
If were going to talk about God then i will. God was there, obviously, he made the whole universe! Then he made Adam, who passed down the story of creation which he heard from God, to his children. Thats the story of the book of Genesis
compewtergameluver 2 months ago
@compewtergameluver Do you have evidence, retard? What a bad joke you are. What an insult O_O
RichtoffenRoach 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RichtoffenRoach More evidence than you...
compewtergameluver 2 months ago
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Find a motor that needs no fuel or input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
polysemousncrk 1 year ago
Religion is simply a way to ease the mind of those who need it. The only problem with this is that people will not question why. This will lead to believing we already have the answers, so why look for the true answers.
TheDayZ11 1 year ago
i noticed that the electron atoms kinda resemble the way planets orbit around the sun. wonder of there is a connection
Davidarmo42415 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Davidarmo42415 "i noticed that the electron atoms kinda resemble the way planets orbit around the sun. wonder of there is a connection"
Pretty much every characteristic of electrons orbiting in atoms versus planets orbiting the sun is completely different. Your mental image of them may look similar but possibly the only common aspect of the two things is that they are mostly empty.
chrisofnottingham 1 year ago
thanks for this
purplepick1 1 year ago
This series is great to watch after smoking weed. The guys voice is nice and soft and the visuals are nice.
soldersucker 1 year ago
@soldersucker hahaha word
robertogj 1 year ago
@soldersucker except for the crazy "lawnmowerman" guy that is at the beginning and end of the vids!
chemed 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@soldersucker except for the crazy "lawnmowerman" guy that is at the beginning and end of the vids!
chemed 1 year ago
I think Religion stands on a more, big picture type of thing while science is small, and big picture, science explains every thing, but with great detail, and evidence supported by even more detail, it tries to explain every thing to its lowest level, kinda like solving for X. While Religion try's to explain everything with one answer, which in not truly provable or disprovable as far as we know.
But this is only what i am believing and thinking at this moment.
urbanterror59 1 year ago
I wish i knew about these amazing videos when i was a student, i've always had problems with understanding such stuff:)
WeirdoOwl 1 year ago
The bald, computer-animated guy creeps me out, lol, but love the video's. And I love how people throw religion into the topic, when the discussion is about science. If you want to preach, go to church! Leave the search for knowledge and scientific facts to those of us who are willing to open our minds up to the truth...
tiestoboi 1 year ago
the animated person is retarted
dollerklause 1 year ago
@dollerklause do you mean 'twice a tart'?
OscardR 1 year ago
@OscardR what ?
dollerklause 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dollerklause yeah, retarted doesn't mean anything, you just made up that word ;)
OscardR 1 year ago
@OscardR yeah, retarted doesn't mean anything, you just made up that word ;)
OscardR 1 year ago
I think atoms is small universes :P
And the the atoms that apear and then disapear in a wacum is big bangs and the lifespan of small universes ah.. i just made that up
dollerklause 1 year ago
dis is rong
muksrulez 1 year ago
Part 2 of this video is really very well done, factually informative and the graphics are very helpful. Excellent teaching resource.
354685789 1 year ago
Seriously, loved the video... Well explained... Good graphics... But your character animation and lips sync almost looks like a live action ken doll scene where the puppet masters are epileptic.
Now, dont get me wrong, I LOVED the video.
Awesome information.
Well explained.
Great graphics.
Baaaaad 3D.
If youre looking for animators, let me know.
FattyGrissle 1 year ago
@ekaj777 The only thing we all are is atomic structures. That is, we are all composed of a collection of atoms created during the life and death of distant stars. The idea of god came erroneously from one of these collections of atoms at some time in our remote past and now today, amazingly, there are still collections of atoms such as yourself who can't separate an idea from a fact no matter how much evidence you are given.
DaithiDublin 1 year ago
If they were aiming for the Uncanny Valley, they landed far far short of it...
LordKarnov42 1 year ago
why is there religious shit here
this has nothing to do with religion.
go away.
BlockisticStudios 1 year ago
I can never tell if these videos use a really good text-to-speech program or have a narrator with an odd accent.
vigcs 1 year ago
where does the incial engergy for everything come from?
chazazaza 1 year ago
A true religion first of all should have signs of physical order to examine and verify its state of truth
And a true religion gives a law of world order to make man not to deviate from order but it will not stop man to think and search research in the field of order
But a wrong religion stops man's thinking and become hurdle for its development and growth
kulyateiqbal 1 year ago
what I have never been able to understand is why people don't get that science and religion (or at least...whatever "god" is) are ONE and the same. We are all one thing...collectively we are "god"...as for proving that...well I guess I just have "faith"
ekaj777 1 year ago
Religion is actually a faith in law and order
It is presented in the form of signs of law and order
But it is not presented in the form of science
Of matter and clay for a man to become materialist
kulyateiqbal 1 year ago
Comment removed
shaneho78 1 year ago
Correct weepaul666. Except when it comes to climate change. Then the science becomes a religion.
Titchify 1 year ago
this video is so fucking cool
delic619 1 year ago
This is a great video. Very well explained
xFrozenTombx 1 year ago
Okay. Science is about discussing the concepts, right? Good. So now tell me, why do we need an animated thing...?
youvebeenthunderstru 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
People have been believing in a God for at least 5000 years. 400 over hundred generations, concurrently. Sciences shows miracles, miracles show God. This is not some idea that was thought of recently and promoted for completely selfish desires for ultimate power and control. Some day soon you'll see the danger of promoting evolution. I'm not against evolution, for one it would take more faith to agree with this "theory" than religious laws.
b29349 1 year ago
science is the search of god, so i do believe in Science
potibh 1 year ago
@potibh
wat
stilwellx 1 year ago
ddnt undertand?
potibh 1 year ago
@potibh
wat
stilwellx 1 year ago
@potibh let's check behind this particle
tmowlee 1 year ago
Science is the search for patterns of matter. I believe patterns were formed by a former, matter by a creator.
b29349 1 year ago
@b29349
Science is not the search for patterns of matter. Science asks questions and tries to find answers whereas religion preaches answers to you and tells you not to ask questions.
musicCway 1 year ago 4
@musicCway
who said u to not to question
world is asking about religion only
kulyateiqbal 1 year ago
@kulyateiqbal
I mean in the way religion teaches what it thinks is the whole truth and never thinks 'well maybe we're wrong about this' whereas science always asks itself 'am I wrong?'
musicCway 1 year ago
@musicCway ahhahahahhahahha
hockeymo 1 year ago
@b29349
yes u r right
kulyateiqbal 1 year ago
@Mattothee
your opinion matters as little as your life does....quantumly speaking of course...
rickwyant 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What is energy?? What is an elementary particle?? does it occupy space and have weight as in the traditional sense of matter?? If an atom can be a wave or a particle , what is a wave?? when we keep going backwards trying to define the unknowable by the unknown, what makes science all that different from religion (not that I'm religious) I think the question we should be asking is what do we do with this time on the planet?? Can we make it good and safe for everyone??
rickwyant 2 years ago
The coment dosent have sense. But religion is very diferent from science because in religion the dobut is view as a bad thing and in sciencie as a good thing. That why they are very diferent.
alanoasiss 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You have to have "FAITH" in the scientists to believe what they say, none of them say the same thing (i.e. regarding origins and what is real) , scientists don't agree, the religious believers don't agree, if noone agrees then WHAT IS TRUTH???? you might as well make it up...
rickwyant 2 years ago
@rickwyant Both science and religion tell a story with different characters. They both live in the imagination of man. The main difference is that the process used in science leads to a story that is very consistent with our human subjective experience. This consistency and coherence is the main difference and enable scientist to do prediction and engineers things that work.
tubetib 2 years ago
What makes science different from religion? Are you serious? Science is supported by evidence. Religion is dependent on faith. Any rational minded person would lean towards science before religion...
weepaul666 2 years ago 57
Your belief in science is just as much based on faith as any religionists is... you "believe", have "faith in" what the scientists are telling you.. look around there is so much pseudo science being promoted, other dimensions, time travel, etc. etc... about as believable as gods and souls... supported by evidence?? your all believers thats all, just as nutty as the religionists....go back to sleep now....all of you , dream away....LOL
rickwyant 2 years ago
LMAO. Science is supported by EVIDENCE. They can PROVE what they're saying. Religion is based on faith. Nothing about a god has ever been proven. When you see a scientist prove a theory, you have to be a dumb fuck to be against it...
weepaul666 2 years ago 32
when did you see a scientist prove a theory LMAO??? Go to sleep, keep dreaming....I didn't mean to wake you up...
rickwyant 2 years ago
@
rickwyant
lol retard!
Mattothee 2 years ago
Comment removed
DustinDeitch 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Even if you saw proof, you would still not believe. Theory are still theory until they are universally accepted then they are referred to as laws.
b29349 1 year ago
What a rediculous thing to say
weepaul666 1 year ago
@weepaul666 and when you see a regious man support a theroy of god with no proof and be against it you must b a genus
Machew4Life 1 year ago
@weepaul666
"When you see a scientist prove a theory, you have to be a dumb fuck to be against it..." What you are saying here is profoundly unscientific. One of the main contrast points between science and religion is that whereas ideas in religion are held as holy and untouchable, ideas in science are open to debate; they can be challenged and absolute certainty is not an option. The ability to question what you think you know to be true is characteristic of the scientific mind.
colourfulwithaU 1 year ago 8
@colourfulwithaU Why don't you just enjoy the science then instead of going on a histrionic rant about religion and faith?
If you don't like religion just ignore it!
Why does everything have to be some kind of histrionic conflict with you people?
KTK401 10 months ago
@KTK401
Someone said something, and I responded. It's not a conflict, I was just answering someone. It was not histrionic in the slightest.
Now, why do you overuse the word 'histrionic'?
colourfulwithaU 10 months ago
@colourfulwithaU It's not overused, come on be honest it's not used enough, when referring to you guys.
If religion bothers you, then ignore it.
regards
KTK401 10 months ago
@KTK401
I'm talking about you specifically. I looked at your comments on other videos. You use that word a lot. Can you think of any synonyms? Dramatic, perhaps?
Religion bothers me because it has detrimental effects on people's minds and on the world. It is a serious problem, and when a serious problem bothers you, ignoring it is not the best option.
colourfulwithaU 10 months ago
@colourfulwithaU Oh give it a rest. The first time I "used that word" as you say was talking to you. I used it again when talking to another bunch of Americans later, so don't over-egg the pudding! You are one being dramatic, trawling other people's comments on other videos, lol.
Religion bothers you personally. It has a beneficial effect on people;s minds overall
Atheism is also a dangerous & detrimental thing as well as it essentially states that we don't actually exist
cont
KTK401 10 months ago
@colourfulwithaU cont..
And therefore there is no real morality.
So atheism or lack of religion also is seriously detrimental ^ very dangerous.
At *least* religion provides a moral code, whereas in atheism there is no *need* for a moral code.
So investigate that as well.
The problem is not religion or atheism in America. It's your extreme mentality & your propensity to argue about everything in the most extreme way rather than just leaving the other side alone & *ignoring* them!
regards
KTK401 10 months ago
@KTK401
Wait, atheism "states that we don't actually exist"? "No real morality"? "No need for a moral code"? Where are you getting this fictional nonsense? There is no trait to atheism other than the lack of belief in supernatural deities. How is it dangerous or detrimental? Unlike you, I can provide some specific examples of instances in which religion has directly caused suffering, oppression, and death (which I will do upon request).
colourfulwithaU 10 months ago