Personally i don't remember ever seeing this PBS Ident being use on any of the PBS shows, which include adult programming for PBS, it must be a fake! I know all PBS Idents by heart! Been watching PBS for decades now!
To recap: I drew this crappy recreation of the 1992 (or 1993, depending on the source) ident from memory back when I was a novice editor on Wikipedia, and someone else mistook it for the real thing while on Wikipedia and put it on CLG Wiki. To be fair, I was ashamed but ignored it. And then someone outed it as fake. I'm surprised it took so long for me to live down this old shame. In any case, I'm glad it's off the CLG Wiki now. There should be a separate page for old shames like this.
@ryanasaurus0077 In any case, whoever originally posted this on CLG Wiki (and I know it wasn't me, look at the edit history going back a couple of years and you'll know) should've gotten the hint that it was a crappy recreation of an existing logo instead of an unknown logo. If feasible, I'm going to the edit history to tell off said user (if he's still around) for uploading the ident in the first place.
THIS-IS-PEE!!!!
AaronStudios3 4 months ago
This is PB
ThePolerbearproducts 7 months ago
This is pee.
thetoolbox112394 9 months ago 2
This is pee. LOL!
Mario10974 11 months ago
Personally i don't remember ever seeing this PBS Ident being use on any of the PBS shows, which include adult programming for PBS, it must be a fake! I know all PBS Idents by heart! Been watching PBS for decades now!
originalfilmmaker 1 year ago
@originalfilmmaker I don't remember seeing this at all on PBS, either.
JeterSwisherFan88 1 year ago
To recap: I drew this crappy recreation of the 1992 (or 1993, depending on the source) ident from memory back when I was a novice editor on Wikipedia, and someone else mistook it for the real thing while on Wikipedia and put it on CLG Wiki. To be fair, I was ashamed but ignored it. And then someone outed it as fake. I'm surprised it took so long for me to live down this old shame. In any case, I'm glad it's off the CLG Wiki now. There should be a separate page for old shames like this.
ryanasaurus0077 1 year ago
@ryanasaurus0077 In any case, whoever originally posted this on CLG Wiki (and I know it wasn't me, look at the edit history going back a couple of years and you'll know) should've gotten the hint that it was a crappy recreation of an existing logo instead of an unknown logo. If feasible, I'm going to the edit history to tell off said user (if he's still around) for uploading the ident in the first place.
ryanasaurus0077 1 year ago
This is Pee? lol Just had to say that. :)
mstblue 2 years ago