Your best weapon has been, is, and will always be knowledge. Technically, Mr Crowder, you are, metaphorically speaking, disarming your viewers with your lies, half-truths, fear-mongering, and stupidity.
The biggest idiot simplifies opposing arguments in order to persuade other idiots into thinking that their argument is superior. No one wants to take away your guns. Regulations must be put in place to insure psychos who want to use guns to kill innocent people don't have easy access to guns and guns accessories that can kill large numbers of people quickly, like semiautomatic rifles or extended clips. If the gov. wanted you dead they would send drones, not British soldiers with muskets.
Who sparked the 1st World War? Who Sparked the 2nd World War? Who dropped the nuclear bomb on Hiroshima and Nekazaki? Who killed 20 Million Australian aborigines? who annihilated more than 100 million American Indians in North American? and more than 50 million American Indians in South America? Who enslaved more than 180 million Africans and 77% died in their way and was buried in the Atlantic Ocean? Who killed more than a million in Algeria & Afghanistan & 3 million in Iraq.??
I hate guns ... but love people who legally have guns because then I don't ever have to use one myself. Gun owners, properly trained and those with good intent, are the only reason violent crime is not out of control. Yep, I said it, those gun toting rednecks and police are our saviors in the US and getting rid of their guns ... that's a very scary thought.
He most likely is quoting Hitler as supporter of gun controll.Sorry but Nazis actually liberalized gun controll in Germany.In short Hitler was a gun advocate;-)
Registration was required prior to Nazis rise to power by 1928 german gun regulation wich they liberalized.As for the Jews it was in conjuction with taking away all of their other rights among wich gun ownership was the least of their problems.Modern gun laws
are not passed in order to taget a sigle ethnic group but encompass all of the society.
But regarding Germany think of this was the II amendment not different from nazi gun laws??It did omnit the black slaves afterall.
@Kharmazov not for the people that were aginest him and thats the point the people that agree with hitler had guns but the ones who didn't thats right died cause they had no way to protect them selfs.So do us all a favor and stop trying to think
@Kharmazov who give a fuck if hitler signed a piece of peper so u really think the jews had gun how about you just watch a documentray on ww2 and the jews and see if they say they had a way to protect them selfs.It awsome in a short 70s year before people like you to agree with hitler.real brave chump
Like I've said before check the Germany gun act of 1938 before you blow your windpipe agian.As for the jews not defending themself,you ever heard about uprising in Warsaw Gettho(not to be confused with later and much larger Warsaw Uprsing),or jewish resistance organisations for that matter?And in the end you acuse of sharing views with the nazis just lovely;-)Seriously get off from your saddle from time to time and do some research;-)
@Kharmazov Yea i do know about the jews upriseing and they didn't by them gun at a gun shop they had to smuggle them in Germany said they was not killing jews too.They also said they wasent buliding up thier navy.So when in your mind dose some of the most evil people in hystory be looked at as liers.Get your head out of the sand it's not hard to believe to think the Nazi would lie
Considering the Warsaw Getho uprising didn't take place in Germany but in Poland
your knowledge on the matter seams to be in question.The uprising had aken place in Poland wich at the time was under German occupation more specificly it was referd to by Nazis as "General Guberie" not he teritory of the III Reich proper.
For the third tim check the fucking gun act of 1938 and see what dose i say.
Wait... Think of it like this, those horrible school shootings, guaranteed once a year now in America, no assault weapons, no school shootings! Fucking morons
For what reason does an assault weapon exsist? To kill people. Why sell civilians tools of death to kill other civilians. If you want to protect your house, buy a revolver. One bullet, maybe two is enough to stop a home invasion. This isnt Halo. You dont need a weapon that holds 36 rounds
@TheCrisisKings I personally think the use of guns for self defense has been highly over rated. statistically, burglars strike when you are at work or on vacation, they don't want an up close personal encounter, or they would be muggers. muggers statistically always sneak attack and you would never see them coming. the reason to have guns is in case we ever had a fascist government.
i can see why people would want to control guns. our homicide rate is higher than most industrialized countries. but you never know when you or someone else needs a gun.
Ah, I almost didn't watch this sense it had Micheal moore in the title, but glad I did.
Your awesome Steven Crowder! Just the Dirty Harry act at the end of the video made you awesome, nm that all the real content makes you a patriot and a man I am proud to call a fellow American.
the only people that they will take guns away from are the people that have them legally so any drrug dealer can come into your home with his illegal assault weapon and you will have nothing.
@AmericansAnnoyMe Guns are for hunters. Guns are for people who want to protect themselves and there families. I guess by chance sometimes the owner can be sad and little...?
@AmericansAnnoyMe yes they can be cause even people your size have the right to defend themselves from a large criminal that will get a gun despite any gun bans the only way to ban guns is to stop makin them and we've made so many tens of millions they will never go away so i suggest if your soo scared , go buy one and realize your justa low payed net shill that needs to et a job helping people then you not be so sad
heh heh your name is funny. Are you implying that every American is stupid? If you are, explain all the inventions and technology America brought to the world.
Real nice having your finger on the trigger of the first firearm you picked up. maybe you should review and cover firearm safety. i hope that is a tripod your using and not a camera man. FYI it's a felony just pointing a gun at someone regardless if its loaded or not.
KEEP YOUR FINGER OFF THE TRIGGER UNTIL YOUR READY TO SHOOT.
@FlyTour69 yea i agree witht that but when i go to buy a gun for my household one day wll it be llegal or smuggled. this act will only enrage the public and if our govt doesnt start helping us theyre gonna go into civil war using what guns we have left.
@diegovercesi I hate republicans too! Super bad! but I love my guns and I wish other liberals would learn that guns are not bad and should be promoted and abundant! I want universal Healthcare and all my 15 guns!
@MrByronodmon I sort of agree with you, I believe that a free person should own how many guns as they want, BUT, I hate those fox news bitches (like crowder) trying to compare obama to Hitler and Stalin, the crap in your country (I'm not american, but I'm into american politics) started with reagan and bush the father, Clinton FIxed it, and then Bush junior fucked it up again, and this neocons just get into my nerves hahahaha
@MrByronodmon universal healthcare do you really want our immigration issue to rise. i think everyone should be given needed help but if its an illegal they get only what they need and then theyre deported and thats speaking with a reliogious influience. economy wise id say present id and proper papers and u can have all the care u need. even though some get fakes but hey itll help a little bit
I feel a lot safer being a Liberal gun owner(yes, it's possible), knowing that douche bags with silly haircuts are so well armed. If it werent formorons like this nobody would have anything bad to say about gun owners.
@SayVandelay1 Thank You! I have actually found the one and only other person alive that is Liberal and still Likes guns and Owns guns! Awesome! I wish people would get off there soap boxes and get educated instead of radicalized!
This is a very common perception and so will not try to be too rough. Ghandi was not a Pacifist by any stretch of the imagination. Non violance-yes/pacifist-no. This will be somewhat contreversial-those people whoim do not believe in bombing abortion clinics or kill people but rather protest-even blocking thew entrance-that is not a pacifist action though it is a non violent action. Am guessing that one brave soul who stood agaiunst a tank in Tiananmen Square-do nnot see that as being a Pacifist
BOOM ROASTED!! thanks so much for this video man, and all of ur vids....I'm using this in a debate powerpoint in my high school government class on Gun Control if you don't mind...ohh and its gonna be a double whammy cuz the last thing we did was watch michael moore's fictional documentary Bowling for Columbine and I completely debunked it by handing in a folder pointing out every false statement and telling the truth...my teachers gonna love that...
@A1pha2R3d yea guns don't kill people they just make it way the fuck easier than anything else except nuclear weapons and germ warfare. Check the homicide rates for countries that have serious gun control like Japan then come to talk to me.
Read the FBI Uniform Crime Report, it's a real eye opener. I've stopped 4 robberies and a rape, without firing a shot, none of them ever made the news.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
It's funny how my last comment was deleted for stating the obvious. Michael Moore isn't against guns nor does he want to ban all guns. If you actually watch Bowling For Columbine you'll see at the most he's talking about how gun control might be needed in some cases. At the same time he talks about how Canada has more guns per capita but less crime. If you're just going to portray everyone in the most extreme light, it's easy to discredit and make fun of them.
What's wrong with gun control? It's not banning firearms completely, it's just putting more jurisdiction over the selling and precurment of dangerous weapons. *compares UK gun crime to USA...* oooh shit homes...you guys is fucking killas! Good effort.
These numbers include the suicides that are committed with firearms, which is even higher than the murder rate with firearm. Over half of the firearm deaths in the US are the result of suicide.
Per FBI, 2004:
Justifiable homicide--480 By law enforcement--337 By private citizen--143 (They usually don't shoot to kill)
Murder--10,100
Suicide--16,750!!!!
Accident--649
These are death rates only, and don't reflect defensive uses which don't end in death.
@Pro3110 i think most people who would shoot someone in their house are shooting to kill, not to wound and send to jail. cops are trained to shoot to kill if a gun is present in the hands of the criminal.
Sorry, fataxe, but not according to the numbers. The logical inference is that most people don't shoot to kill in a self-defense scenario. They are more often involved with self-defensive shootings, but they kill half as many criminals as police officers do.
Whether this is intentional and not a mere correlation is anybody's guess, but it is the logical result because police officers would have exhausted other possible means of restraint prior to pulling their weapons.
I don't care if anyone shoots to kill in a self-defense scenario; if a criminal chooses to act in a way that warrants the use of deadly force against him, in my book they've lost their right to live.
OKAY, so based on your stats, which may not be accurate but what ever. around 27,500 people died in non-accidental fire. Now, if you study guns for about, say five minutes you will know that any gun can kill someone, Obama wanted to take assault rifles away - he can't take sidearms away because we have a constitution. Using a gun to kill is the easier option yes, but if someone was truly determined to kill they would use any means to do so. So this is what socialism does to people...
@Pro3110 if you're saying guns should be illegal because people use them to kill themselves.. I'm pretty sure that people will find alternate ways to kill themselve rather than using a gun...
Oh, darlin', read my comments for the past three years. I'm one of the most pro-gun people one could ever want to talk with!
I was arguing with a moron who was trying to portray our gun death rate as being our murder rate with guns. Two vastly different things, wouldn't you agree? He was also claiming some ludicrously high figure as being our "accident" rate, whereas I simply provided the correct number for that year.
This is what happens when someone only sees the end of a week-long discussion. Points are totally missed and things are taken way, way, way out of context.
The point being that the high death rate attributed to firearms is accountable to the amount of suicides by gun.
@Pro3110 You can't even follow the logic in that? That's how I test people for their fanaticism. The less logical, the more wacky my subject absolutely is.
@bojanks15 I think most people actually willing to go through with suicide no matter the method would find a way to do it and still be as likely to complete the task!
Mr. Drunkard, please read H.R. 648, of 2003, introduced in the House of Representatives. Pay particular attention to Section 2., paragraph 2. Therein, you will find legislative backing of the correct figures.
Sec. 2, P. 2, sub-section A:
"Every year, more than 2,400,000 people in the United States use a gun to defend themselves against criminals--or more than 6,500 people a day."
Of course, the libtards voted this bill down. They like for people to be defenseless, just like all criminals do.
@Pro3110 im sorry but congress pushes a lot of bills with no reliable research to back its statistic liberal and conservatives do it. tell me the name of one government agency or an unbiased research organization that shows that statistics you mentioned are right. and im not supporting taking away guns im just saying in this day and age there are better alternatives to protecting yourself.
There's this little group called the Federal Bureau of Investigation that will confirm that I'm right in repeating their statistics. Don't like it? Go talk to them.
Check their Uniform Crime Report. It will verify everything that you have been told on this page. You been given the proper sources over six times now. Quit asking the same question over and over. You're becoming a broken record of denial.
@Pro3110 Between 1987 and 1990, David McDowall found that guns were used in defense during a crime incident 64,615 times annually. This equates to two times out of 1,000 incidents 0.2% that occurred in this time frame. , and the National Crime Victimization Survey estimates that 2,628,532 nonfatal crimes involving guns occurred. and the research for the statistic you mention was conducted by Gary Kleck and his research has been discredited numerous times by other researchers
Which federal agency does this guy represent? Does this "survey" portray factual statistics by crime enforcement units? Or is it just a "survey" of other anti-gun propagandists? :) Don't bother answering, as I already know the truth.
BTW, last year, your fellow drunkards killed 10,839 people on the roadways of the US. Your kind murders more people each year than even criminals do with guns!!!
I googled this guy. 25 people with his name came up, but none of them had any kind of link to being of any note in the field of firearms. Can't you even come up with real people while proselytizing your propaganda?
@Pro3110 search "Gun violence in the United States" in wikipedia and you will find all the research and the citations for the research and you are WRONG About the statistics
Wiki??!! Are you serious? NO wonder you're so confused!!! That site has been attacked with false information! Shoot, when I was in college, any paper using Wiki as a reference was immediately given an "F" because of how inaccurate it is! Rolling on the floor laughing at you now!!!!
Use credible citations, such as the Bureau of Justice, the CDC, or the FBI. Anything else is subject to ridicule.
Bureau of Justice states that in 2010 (where the REAL NCVS figures come from), reports that there were 352,810 non-fatal firearms victims, but does not state whether they were the criminals or the real victims in the incident. These are not "estimates", but fact.
Again, you're lying. Concealing your lie as an "estimate" doesn't work in real life.
@Pro3110 and the research i quoted was done over a different time frame and different decade i will no loner reply but i realize there better options than guns for self defense
No. I'm afraid you may have caught the end of a week long argument. If you'll go back about ten pages or so and read everything I've posted, you will see that I'm wholeheartedly FOR the Second Amendment and am against any kind of unconstitutional anti-gun laws being passed.
An armed society is the only free and polite society. Unarmed societies are enslaved and/or are defenseless.
@Pro3110 " Every year, more than 2,400,000 people in the United States use a gun to defend themselves against criminals--or more than 6,500 people a day"
Where is the reference link for the claim cited in this legislation ?
@DeathToTeaBaggers LMAO have YOU even offered any valid points or are you just saying shit like "oh your a nut". Here is the difference between you and Pro3110. I've actually seen statistics in his comments. i've only seen insults in yours. You're an imbecile.
You can google it as easily as the next guy. I gave the name of the bill, the reference number, and HR number. Besides, the more you read about it, the more that you'll see how the anti-gun lobby has manipulated many of these stats into what appears as a logical approach to the banning of firearms, when, in reality, the whole truth is that the more guns in private hands, the fewer the crimes and the lower the murder rates.
@Pro3110 Dude I'm not talking about what some teabgger politico claimed in a bill I'm taking about the actual proof of his claim . Or did you just take his word for it like a sheeple ?
i can't even recall the last time I heard of someone on the news defending themselves or saving anyone with a firearm and I live in a major metropolitan area, let alone people doing it to the tune of 6,500 a DAY ! That's ludicrous and asinine.
It was a 2003 bill, years prior to the creation of the Tea Party movement.
Go get a little bit of knowledge so that others with knowledge can speak intelligently with you. It is rare for the AP to pick up these stories, because they want people to think the way you do (a perfect example of their success). The next time you pick up an American Rifleman mag, check out their "Armed Citizen" column. It's highlights of that month's self-defensive uses of weapons.
@Pro3110 So where did the congressman get the statistical information he used in his bill ? What was his source ? It's a simple question you seem unable to answer.
@Pro3110 Why am i asking you, are your srs ? I'm asking you because you're the guy who sourced it like it was the gospel truth that's why..sheesh..DUH !
These numbers include the suicides that are committed with firearms, which is even higher than the murder rate with firearm. Over half of the firearm deaths in the US are the result of suicide.
Per FBI, 2004:
Justifiable homicide--480 By law enforcement--337 By private citizen--143 (They usually don't shoot to kill)
Murder--10,100
Suicide--16,750!!!!
Accident--649
These are death rates only, and don't reflect defensive uses which don't end in death.
Gun control isn't possible. People will get shot if they try to take weapons away from citizens. Plus you can't keep the guns away from the criminals. Impossible!
He's right! As a progressive witnessing the treatment of the occupy oakland protesters, I'd say its time for the American left to arms ourselves. The defense of assembly is being threatened in all corners whether it be to protest or to join fellow workers in union. The growing militia threat growing from the right is cause for concern for any actual freedom loving American.
The fact is conservatives use the gun issue to win over easily impressionable rednecks. yes i meant to rednecks.
@Mrinebriation There are 1500 deaths due to firearm accidents a year,people stop thousands and thousands of criminals a year with guns,please if your going to try to make a point research the topic.
@Kidwitha12gauge i highly doubt civilians stop thousand of crimes and if they do, not all crimes should be stopped with a guns. and if you dont feel safe get a taser gun, that way there is less of a chance you will kill a family member or a stranger and you will be able to stop criminals.
@Mrinebriation You keep your little taser toy,when someone breaks into my house im using my 12 gauge.
If you feel safe with a taser you are mentally insane,you think a taser is going to stop one thats on drugs?Can you use a taser on several people at once?When something goes bump in the night and you have a 12 gauge next to a taser which are you going to grab?If you pick the taser you are asking for someone to murder you and your family.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@Kidwitha12gauge first of all your comment is hilarious second of all your argument is not logical
and im just saying you can use a security system or taser gun there several options that can be used to keep you safe and reduce the number of gun related accidents
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@Kidwitha12gauge name one fucking drug that can help the user resist a taser. and if somebody does enter your house and tries to steal from would it not be more appropriate to incapacitate him and let the cops handle it instead blowing his brains out he maybe a child he maybe mentally handicapped and not to mention you can use a security system and if people did that the number of accidental death would decrease and people would still be secure. if that sound unreasonable then i apologize
@Kidwitha12gauge now i want you to honestly tell me which of the following scenarios is more likely to happen a person who injected huge amounts of meth into his system somehow manages to still have the mental dexterity to use a gun goes into your house bypass your security system with his mad hacking skills and manages to withstand 500000 volts then proceeds to kill you. Or you shoot a rat or an Innocent person.
also if 4 or 5 people go into your house with guns your dead no matter what
@Mrinebriation You're claiming self defense against a drug user is "improbable" but then cite the idea of 4-5 people breaking in, of which you then claim you are dead already, so you might as well just sit there and take it.
Its like you control advocates don't even try to come up with coherent or rational responses. It's always we have to go out of harms way to protect criminals. You also seem to think shit like ADT gives you force shields and doesn't just call 911 for you.
@Mrinebriation First off,security systems don't work,they scare off pussies.
Second meth heads break into houses all the time.
3rd tasers are illegal to own in several states,including PA
4th If 4 people break into my house im not dead,the 12 gauge holds 5 shots and I have another 4 on the stock,that is 6 rounds of oo buckshot and 3 slugs,I would end up taking all of them out.
@Mrinebriation My shotgun holds 6 rounds,I can shoot all of them,accurately,in 3-4 seconds,and thats at 30 yards im sure when someone is within 10 yards of me I can unload my gun quicker.
You want to come up with more "points" so I can continue to shoot them down?I can do it all day,im used to making liberals feel stupid,im a pro at it.
@Kidwitha12gauge they probably how to use and are just as quick at it as you or even if their slightly slower they have numbers on their side so i doubt you will be able to do anything what if you are sleeping since criminals come at night and smart ones dont make any noise you will be dead before you know it, but if you had an alarm system they wont wait for your neighbors and cops to come they will just run
@Kidwitha12gauge i checked on the thing you said about how drugs can help you resist 50000 volts and i could not find any evidence to suggest that is the truth.please check the statistics and you will see that guns do more harm than good. also you can not prepare for every situation people with more protections more guns than you have died because of a single bullet that threat will always remain no matter what you do, and i support stricter gun control but i do not support the banning of guns
@Mrinebriation What is gun control going to do?If you haven't noticed criminals don't follow the laws,so if they see they can't own a certain gun do you think that will stop them?And maybe you need to search a little more,and maybe you should check the stats because guns save people every day.
If someone is raping your sister and im there,do you want me to draw a gun and shoot him or do you want me to walk away?
@Kidwitha12gauge im just saying if we have stricter back ground checks criminals would have less guns because most criminals get their guns through legal means and i checked fact every thing seem to indicate the guns do more harm than good please search through reliable sources and then make judgment. i would like to ask you something why stop at wimpy shot guns why not missile launcher or a nuke i mean the second amendment did not specify which "arms" we can have
@Mrinebriation You do know the background checks go through FBI and ATF right?You are a complete idiot,most criminals get their guns by stealing them or buying them from drug dealers,who stole them.
And thousands of people a year are saved by firearms,if you want those people dead continue to support stricter gun control,your just as guilty as criminals.
Why do you keep spouting alcohol-induced delusions as being facts?
If they are criminals, then any gun they possess is illegally obtained. (DUH!) Therefore, any gun crime committed by a previously convicted criminal is, by law, committed with an illegally obtained gun.
According to the 1997 Survey of State Prison Inmates, among those possessing a gun, the source of the gun was from an illegal source for 80%.
@Mrinebriation Your previous post states "stricter background checks means criminals would have less guns because they get their guns legallyy" make up your mind,is it most or some?
And what source do I need?I know for a fact how background checks work and I know for a fact thousands of people are alive today because of their gun.
@Mrinebriation Nice come back,are you done?Its clear to me I have won this and you're a complete moron,you have not made a valid point.I can continue to do this for weeks if you like,but its going to be the same thing,you say something idiotic I say something that makes sense.
PCP. People's muscles have constricted so violently on that drug that they've broken their own bones, makes them dang near impervious to pain, and causes hallucinations that render them incapable of logical thought.
Look up CDC statistics. In 2002, the latest complete stats, in the US there were 762 accidental gun deaths and 2.5 Million in the same year to defend oneself. Facts ruin the anti-gunner's claims.
@Mrinebriation Also, every week over a thousand violent crimes are prevented from self defense, every WEEK despite your "high doubts". And the vast majority of the time no shots are fired, its simply the threat of shooting the criminal. You would know this if you could look up facts, but if you knew facts, you wouldn't be for hampering the natural right to self defense.
Move to CA or NY or some other high crime + control state if you really think restricting civil liberties decreases crime.
@MachShot1337 i live in california and i never had to use gun, but my house does have a security system also show me the source of the statistic you mentioned
Guns are used nearly twice as much in defense than they are used for undue assault.
Over 1,000,000 times a year in defense.
So I apologize, I lied, I way understated it before. Its not +1000, its closer to 3000.
"hurr I never needed a gun"
A single person isn't aggregate statistics. That alarm system you have will only get the police to your house 30 seconds faster, and burglars aren't afraid of less-than-lethal stun guns.
You can find reliable sources through the FBI, Interpol, the CDC, National Sheriff's Association, the DOJ, the Harvard Institute of Law and Policy, and NationMaster.
They all prove the same thing. That the anti-gunner's don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to the truth.
The Nat. Sher. Assoc. states that the armed citizen prevents crime SEVEN times more often than a police officer does. Enlighten yourself, please.
Are you so inebriated so early in the day that you cannot look them up with me providing the sources already? Or are you so much of a liberal that you expect everyone to take care of you and do things for you that you won't do them yourself?
You know YT won't let links be posted. I gave you the sources. Do something for yourself for a change and get enlightened. My daughter could have looked them up by the time she was ten, without my assistance. Do the same.
@Pro3110 i looked it up and the fbi estimates that roughly 5 crimes are stopped by gun owners in the us every year and there is roughly 15000 accidental deaths caused by guns thats why im asking for a credibale source cause every source i fined points to the fact that you are either ignorant or a lying
so please give me a credible source and ill admit you are right
@Pro3110 you said the armed citizens prevent crime SEVEN times more than the police, there is not a SINGLE reliable website that suggests that is the truth. and if you look it up you will realize that guns are used accidentally a lot more than they are used for self defense.
You need to tighten the screws on the Colt 45 replica, is that a Uberti?
isamtator 4 days ago
Your best weapon has been, is, and will always be knowledge. Technically, Mr Crowder, you are, metaphorically speaking, disarming your viewers with your lies, half-truths, fear-mongering, and stupidity.
derralgerken 5 days ago
The biggest idiot simplifies opposing arguments in order to persuade other idiots into thinking that their argument is superior. No one wants to take away your guns. Regulations must be put in place to insure psychos who want to use guns to kill innocent people don't have easy access to guns and guns accessories that can kill large numbers of people quickly, like semiautomatic rifles or extended clips. If the gov. wanted you dead they would send drones, not British soldiers with muskets.
derralgerken 5 days ago
This house protected by KIMBER!
fbrown172 6 days ago
hahahaha This guy called referred to people as "sissies" this dude is the epitome of a pussy.
hitthecouch 1 week ago
That guy doesn't live in that house with that 10 year old POS Explorer.
hitthecouch 1 week ago
Second vid I've watched of Steven's. Ok, I'm a fan.
Sifgrida 1 week ago
poor Michael :(.
BALJIT147 2 weeks ago
"if i could o crap"
TheCaulkerman 2 weeks ago
@A1pha2R3d
yep,iam with you, those that break into my house have the first row ticket to the movie "Watch your life pass by in a flash"
Hoschi0913 2 weeks ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
Who sparked the 1st World War? Who Sparked the 2nd World War? Who dropped the nuclear bomb on Hiroshima and Nekazaki? Who killed 20 Million Australian aborigines? who annihilated more than 100 million American Indians in North American? and more than 50 million American Indians in South America? Who enslaved more than 180 million Africans and 77% died in their way and was buried in the Atlantic Ocean? Who killed more than a million in Algeria & Afghanistan & 3 million in Iraq.??
10888838 2 weeks ago
Don't forget Mao!
apoco 2 weeks ago 3
At first i thought i was going to dislike this video. After watching it.... I am a fan. Good day to you sir!
mattwg2009 2 weeks ago 2
Fuck Michael Moore
jthazard1 2 weeks ago 3
I hate guns ... but love people who legally have guns because then I don't ever have to use one myself. Gun owners, properly trained and those with good intent, are the only reason violent crime is not out of control. Yep, I said it, those gun toting rednecks and police are our saviors in the US and getting rid of their guns ... that's a very scary thought.
KittenKoder 2 weeks ago
1:40 Che Guevara was a leader who wanted gun control? He never controlled a nation, he was a revolutionary who over threw a dictator
what can I say? Your an idiot
MuslimGoku 3 weeks ago
@MuslimGoku
He most likely is quoting Hitler as supporter of gun controll.Sorry but Nazis actually liberalized gun controll in Germany.In short Hitler was a gun advocate;-)
Kharmazov 3 weeks ago
@Kharmazov But he registered and confiscated guns from the Jews.
Spar10Leonidas 3 weeks ago 2
@Spar10Leonidas
Registration was required prior to Nazis rise to power by 1928 german gun regulation wich they liberalized.As for the Jews it was in conjuction with taking away all of their other rights among wich gun ownership was the least of their problems.Modern gun laws
are not passed in order to taget a sigle ethnic group but encompass all of the society.
But regarding Germany think of this was the II amendment not different from nazi gun laws??It did omnit the black slaves afterall.
Kharmazov 3 weeks ago
@Kharmazov not for the people that were aginest him and thats the point the people that agree with hitler had guns but the ones who didn't thats right died cause they had no way to protect them selfs.So do us all a favor and stop trying to think
ugotcatfish 3 weeks ago
@ugotcatfish
Have you ever even seen the Germany gun act of 1938???If not either check or stop making an idiot out of yourself cowboy.
Kharmazov 3 weeks ago
@Kharmazov who give a fuck if hitler signed a piece of peper so u really think the jews had gun how about you just watch a documentray on ww2 and the jews and see if they say they had a way to protect them selfs.It awsome in a short 70s year before people like you to agree with hitler.real brave chump
ugotcatfish 3 weeks ago
@ugotcatfish
Like I've said before check the Germany gun act of 1938 before you blow your windpipe agian.As for the jews not defending themself,you ever heard about uprising in Warsaw Gettho(not to be confused with later and much larger Warsaw Uprsing),or jewish resistance organisations for that matter?And in the end you acuse of sharing views with the nazis just lovely;-)Seriously get off from your saddle from time to time and do some research;-)
Kharmazov 3 weeks ago
@Kharmazov Yea i do know about the jews upriseing and they didn't by them gun at a gun shop they had to smuggle them in Germany said they was not killing jews too.They also said they wasent buliding up thier navy.So when in your mind dose some of the most evil people in hystory be looked at as liers.Get your head out of the sand it's not hard to believe to think the Nazi would lie
ugotcatfish 2 weeks ago
@ugotcatfish
Considering the Warsaw Getho uprising didn't take place in Germany but in Poland
your knowledge on the matter seams to be in question.The uprising had aken place in Poland wich at the time was under German occupation more specificly it was referd to by Nazis as "General Guberie" not he teritory of the III Reich proper.
For the third tim check the fucking gun act of 1938 and see what dose i say.
Kharmazov 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep our second amendment rights so I can shoot this little petulant fool in the face and put him out of his ignorant misery!
Willywonka1455 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Willywonka1455 3 weeks ago
Wait... Think of it like this, those horrible school shootings, guaranteed once a year now in America, no assault weapons, no school shootings! Fucking morons
TheWolfboy90 3 weeks ago
For what reason does an assault weapon exsist? To kill people. Why sell civilians tools of death to kill other civilians. If you want to protect your house, buy a revolver. One bullet, maybe two is enough to stop a home invasion. This isnt Halo. You dont need a weapon that holds 36 rounds
TheCrisisKings 3 weeks ago
@TheCrisisKings what if your home gets invaded by seven people? what if you are a bad shot and miss 6 out of seven shots?
halloranedward 3 weeks ago
@TheCrisisKings I personally think the use of guns for self defense has been highly over rated. statistically, burglars strike when you are at work or on vacation, they don't want an up close personal encounter, or they would be muggers. muggers statistically always sneak attack and you would never see them coming. the reason to have guns is in case we ever had a fascist government.
halloranedward 3 weeks ago
i can see why people would want to control guns. our homicide rate is higher than most industrialized countries. but you never know when you or someone else needs a gun.
paulinotou 4 weeks ago
Ah, I almost didn't watch this sense it had Micheal moore in the title, but glad I did.
Your awesome Steven Crowder! Just the Dirty Harry act at the end of the video made you awesome, nm that all the real content makes you a patriot and a man I am proud to call a fellow American.
RavenBaron 4 weeks ago
OMG!!!! laughed my ass off! That was beautifuly composed and put together! Thank you!
ultimatehistorybuff1 1 month ago 8
the only people that they will take guns away from are the people that have them legally so any drrug dealer can come into your home with his illegal assault weapon and you will have nothing.
VastStoolPigeon 1 month ago 3
press 4...
TheKatanafreak 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Your videos suck.
Guns are for sad little men.
AmericansAnnoyMe 1 month ago
@AmericansAnnoyMe Guns are for hunters. Guns are for people who want to protect themselves and there families. I guess by chance sometimes the owner can be sad and little...?
sprinkler5802 1 month ago
@AmericansAnnoyMe
trollers unite
RStarvling 1 month ago
@AmericansAnnoyMe yes they can be cause even people your size have the right to defend themselves from a large criminal that will get a gun despite any gun bans the only way to ban guns is to stop makin them and we've made so many tens of millions they will never go away so i suggest if your soo scared , go buy one and realize your justa low payed net shill that needs to et a job helping people then you not be so sad
toob247 1 month ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@toob247
You're basically illiterate.
What you wrote has about 50 mistakes.... american education system at its finest.
Seems like stupid people compensate for their lack of intelligence with gun ownership.
AmericansAnnoyMe 1 month ago
@AmericansAnnoyMe
heh heh your name is funny. Are you implying that every American is stupid? If you are, explain all the inventions and technology America brought to the world.
RStarvling 1 month ago
Real nice having your finger on the trigger of the first firearm you picked up. maybe you should review and cover firearm safety. i hope that is a tripod your using and not a camera man. FYI it's a felony just pointing a gun at someone regardless if its loaded or not.
KEEP YOUR FINGER OFF THE TRIGGER UNTIL YOUR READY TO SHOOT.
TheBigyoc 1 month ago
Love the Gandhi quote--nice touch. Also, "Can we edit that..." & "Get out of my way lumpy" haaaaha!
gretasandiego 1 month ago 17
Guns don't kill liberals ...I do
Freelancer581 1 month ago 4
@FlyTour69 yea i agree witht that but when i go to buy a gun for my household one day wll it be llegal or smuggled. this act will only enrage the public and if our govt doesnt start helping us theyre gonna go into civil war using what guns we have left.
MrDanny0924 1 month ago
There's really no need to worry about our leaders. They can't take away our guns.
Just live your life as if we had no president.
FlyTour69 1 month ago
Aaaaaa the famous words of Clint Eastwood
GermanSharp1 1 month ago
@MrEpiclyrandom it's not really about fetishism it's more about having the ability to defend ourselves against violence.
Ravengaurd6 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StevenCrowder So annoying loud unfunny jew how is your YouTube "career" going ?.
redskull39 1 month ago
GOSH I HATE REPUBLICANS
diegovercesi 1 month ago
@diegovercesi I hate republicans too! Super bad! but I love my guns and I wish other liberals would learn that guns are not bad and should be promoted and abundant! I want universal Healthcare and all my 15 guns!
MrByronodmon 1 month ago
@MrByronodmon I sort of agree with you, I believe that a free person should own how many guns as they want, BUT, I hate those fox news bitches (like crowder) trying to compare obama to Hitler and Stalin, the crap in your country (I'm not american, but I'm into american politics) started with reagan and bush the father, Clinton FIxed it, and then Bush junior fucked it up again, and this neocons just get into my nerves hahahaha
diegovercesi 1 month ago
@diegovercesi oh yeah I hate FOX news too because they are mostly retarded!
MrByronodmon 1 month ago
@MrByronodmon universal healthcare do you really want our immigration issue to rise. i think everyone should be given needed help but if its an illegal they get only what they need and then theyre deported and thats speaking with a reliogious influience. economy wise id say present id and proper papers and u can have all the care u need. even though some get fakes but hey itll help a little bit
MrDanny0924 1 month ago
764 pieces of shit hate your Rights
QuartuvLarry 1 month ago
I feel a lot safer being a Liberal gun owner(yes, it's possible), knowing that douche bags with silly haircuts are so well armed. If it werent formorons like this nobody would have anything bad to say about gun owners.
SayVandelay1 1 month ago
@SayVandelay1 Thank You! I have actually found the one and only other person alive that is Liberal and still Likes guns and Owns guns! Awesome! I wish people would get off there soap boxes and get educated instead of radicalized!
MrByronodmon 1 month ago
While Steve mentions that tyrants disarm people, he didn't mention that they murdered over 150 million people in the 20th century by doing so.
SovereignStatesman 1 month ago 4
"I think there are a few glocks around, but technically those are my moms" awesome
1veryreal 1 month ago
This is a very common perception and so will not try to be too rough. Ghandi was not a Pacifist by any stretch of the imagination. Non violance-yes/pacifist-no. This will be somewhat contreversial-those people whoim do not believe in bombing abortion clinics or kill people but rather protest-even blocking thew entrance-that is not a pacifist action though it is a non violent action. Am guessing that one brave soul who stood agaiunst a tank in Tiananmen Square-do nnot see that as being a Pacifist
daveme7 1 month ago
DO NOT FUCK WITH MICHAEL MOORE!
JohaNN010 1 month ago
douchebags and guns. what a brilliant combination!
doctordoctordocism 2 months ago
BOOM ROASTED!! thanks so much for this video man, and all of ur vids....I'm using this in a debate powerpoint in my high school government class on Gun Control if you don't mind...ohh and its gonna be a double whammy cuz the last thing we did was watch michael moore's fictional documentary Bowling for Columbine and I completely debunked it by handing in a folder pointing out every false statement and telling the truth...my teachers gonna love that...
codybumpus 2 months ago 5
guns don't shoot people; people shoot guns.
gotyourtongue 2 months ago
LMFAO!
RoyBolinggoing 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@A1pha2R3d yea guns don't kill people they just make it way the fuck easier than anything else except nuclear weapons and germ warfare. Check the homicide rates for countries that have serious gun control like Japan then come to talk to me.
DeathToTeaBaggers 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you look at "StevenCrowder" and "JacobSpinney" videos you can tell they were made by the same video company.
And seeing as how they're both Jews I'm guessing some zionist neo-con think tank paid for them.
redskull39 2 months ago
@StevenCrowder Vhat do vee havenzee here ? Another shameless self promoting Jew leading the dumkoff pro-gun crowd around by zere noses ?
Gott en Himmel !
redskull39 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Read the FBI Uniform Crime Report, it's a real eye opener. I've stopped 4 robberies and a rape, without firing a shot, none of them ever made the news.
survive1999 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You are blind.
Macebeard 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's funny how my last comment was deleted for stating the obvious. Michael Moore isn't against guns nor does he want to ban all guns. If you actually watch Bowling For Columbine you'll see at the most he's talking about how gun control might be needed in some cases. At the same time he talks about how Canada has more guns per capita but less crime. If you're just going to portray everyone in the most extreme light, it's easy to discredit and make fun of them.
Amblue33 2 months ago
Trade your machine guns with Iran's nuclear weapons.
As for UK we like to stick a knife in our enemies, twist it and look in to their eyes to see whats going on in there!
linkingaj 2 months ago
What's wrong with gun control? It's not banning firearms completely, it's just putting more jurisdiction over the selling and precurment of dangerous weapons. *compares UK gun crime to USA...* oooh shit homes...you guys is fucking killas! Good effort.
Dandramere 2 months ago
STEVEN! Get your finger off that trigger, son! Didn't yo daddy teach you gun safety? :P
moondog1997 2 months ago 2
These numbers include the suicides that are committed with firearms, which is even higher than the murder rate with firearm. Over half of the firearm deaths in the US are the result of suicide.
Per FBI, 2004:
Justifiable homicide--480 By law enforcement--337 By private citizen--143 (They usually don't shoot to kill)
Murder--10,100
Suicide--16,750!!!!
Accident--649
These are death rates only, and don't reflect defensive uses which don't end in death.
Pro3110 2 months ago 17
@Pro3110 i think most people who would shoot someone in their house are shooting to kill, not to wound and send to jail. cops are trained to shoot to kill if a gun is present in the hands of the criminal.
fataxe1 2 months ago
@fataxe1
Sorry, fataxe, but not according to the numbers. The logical inference is that most people don't shoot to kill in a self-defense scenario. They are more often involved with self-defensive shootings, but they kill half as many criminals as police officers do.
Whether this is intentional and not a mere correlation is anybody's guess, but it is the logical result because police officers would have exhausted other possible means of restraint prior to pulling their weapons.
Pro3110 2 months ago 6
@Pro3110
I don't care if anyone shoots to kill in a self-defense scenario; if a criminal chooses to act in a way that warrants the use of deadly force against him, in my book they've lost their right to live.
SovereignStatesman 1 month ago
@Pro3110
OKAY, so based on your stats, which may not be accurate but what ever. around 27,500 people died in non-accidental fire. Now, if you study guns for about, say five minutes you will know that any gun can kill someone, Obama wanted to take assault rifles away - he can't take sidearms away because we have a constitution. Using a gun to kill is the easier option yes, but if someone was truly determined to kill they would use any means to do so. So this is what socialism does to people...
simplesnip3z 2 months ago
@Pro3110 if you're saying guns should be illegal because people use them to kill themselves.. I'm pretty sure that people will find alternate ways to kill themselve rather than using a gun...
joeyyyxxx 2 months ago
@joeyyyxxx
Oh, darlin', read my comments for the past three years. I'm one of the most pro-gun people one could ever want to talk with!
I was arguing with a moron who was trying to portray our gun death rate as being our murder rate with guns. Two vastly different things, wouldn't you agree? He was also claiming some ludicrously high figure as being our "accident" rate, whereas I simply provided the correct number for that year.
Pro3110 2 months ago 3
@Pro3110 so if less families owned guns, less suicides. But, who cares about those depressed kids right?
bojanks15 1 month ago
@bojanks15
This is what happens when someone only sees the end of a week-long discussion. Points are totally missed and things are taken way, way, way out of context.
The point being that the high death rate attributed to firearms is accountable to the amount of suicides by gun.
Pro3110 1 month ago
@Pro3110 Like regulating free speech. They're not "taking it away," so long as they're the ones approving it?
And, uh...some animals are more equal than other animals. OK.
QuartuvLarry 1 month ago
@QuartuvLarry
Uhm, what are you talking about? Can you clarify, please? I have zero point of reference with your comment or inquiry. Thank you.
Pro3110 1 month ago
@Pro3110 You can't even follow the logic in that? That's how I test people for their fanaticism. The less logical, the more wacky my subject absolutely is.
QuartuvLarry 1 month ago
@bojanks15 I think most people actually willing to go through with suicide no matter the method would find a way to do it and still be as likely to complete the task!
MrByronodmon 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mr. Drunkard, please read H.R. 648, of 2003, introduced in the House of Representatives. Pay particular attention to Section 2., paragraph 2. Therein, you will find legislative backing of the correct figures.
Sec. 2, P. 2, sub-section A:
"Every year, more than 2,400,000 people in the United States use a gun to defend themselves against criminals--or more than 6,500 people a day."
Of course, the libtards voted this bill down. They like for people to be defenseless, just like all criminals do.
Pro3110 2 months ago 18
@Pro3110 im sorry but congress pushes a lot of bills with no reliable research to back its statistic liberal and conservatives do it. tell me the name of one government agency or an unbiased research organization that shows that statistics you mentioned are right. and im not supporting taking away guns im just saying in this day and age there are better alternatives to protecting yourself.
Mrinebriation 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mrinebriation
There's this little group called the Federal Bureau of Investigation that will confirm that I'm right in repeating their statistics. Don't like it? Go talk to them.
Check their Uniform Crime Report. It will verify everything that you have been told on this page. You been given the proper sources over six times now. Quit asking the same question over and over. You're becoming a broken record of denial.
Pro3110 2 months ago 13
@Pro3110 Between 1987 and 1990, David McDowall found that guns were used in defense during a crime incident 64,615 times annually. This equates to two times out of 1,000 incidents 0.2% that occurred in this time frame. , and the National Crime Victimization Survey estimates that 2,628,532 nonfatal crimes involving guns occurred. and the research for the statistic you mention was conducted by Gary Kleck and his research has been discredited numerous times by other researchers
Mrinebriation 2 months ago
@Mrinebriation
Which federal agency does this guy represent? Does this "survey" portray factual statistics by crime enforcement units? Or is it just a "survey" of other anti-gun propagandists? :) Don't bother answering, as I already know the truth.
BTW, last year, your fellow drunkards killed 10,839 people on the roadways of the US. Your kind murders more people each year than even criminals do with guns!!!
Pro3110 2 months ago 4
@Mrinebriation
I googled this guy. 25 people with his name came up, but none of them had any kind of link to being of any note in the field of firearms. Can't you even come up with real people while proselytizing your propaganda?
Pro3110 2 months ago 4
@Pro3110 search "Gun violence in the United States" in wikipedia and you will find all the research and the citations for the research and you are WRONG About the statistics
Mrinebriation 2 months ago
@Mrinebriation
Wiki??!! Are you serious? NO wonder you're so confused!!! That site has been attacked with false information! Shoot, when I was in college, any paper using Wiki as a reference was immediately given an "F" because of how inaccurate it is! Rolling on the floor laughing at you now!!!!
Use credible citations, such as the Bureau of Justice, the CDC, or the FBI. Anything else is subject to ridicule.
Pro3110 2 months ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
@Pro3110 all research is cited and you can find the official sources if you scroll down
Mrinebriation 2 months ago
@Mrinebriation
Wow! Tell the FBI, the CDC, and the Bureau of Justice that their own facts are wrong, then!
I'm using the real stats provided by these agencies, directly, with no interference by outside sources.
Pro3110 2 months ago 4
Bureau of Justice states that in 2010 (where the REAL NCVS figures come from), reports that there were 352,810 non-fatal firearms victims, but does not state whether they were the criminals or the real victims in the incident. These are not "estimates", but fact.
Again, you're lying. Concealing your lie as an "estimate" doesn't work in real life.
Pro3110 2 months ago 15
@Pro3110 and the research i quoted was done over a different time frame and different decade i will no loner reply but i realize there better options than guns for self defense
Mrinebriation 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mrinebriation
Not according to the facts. Go on now, crawl back into your bottle.
Pro3110 2 months ago 5
@Pro3110 so whats the point of the argument your trying to make here? That gun control is a good thing?
TrabbyWarbucks2011 2 months ago
@TrabbyWarbucks2011
No. I'm afraid you may have caught the end of a week long argument. If you'll go back about ten pages or so and read everything I've posted, you will see that I'm wholeheartedly FOR the Second Amendment and am against any kind of unconstitutional anti-gun laws being passed.
An armed society is the only free and polite society. Unarmed societies are enslaved and/or are defenseless.
Pro3110 1 month ago 2
@Pro3110
What difference does it make, people have the right to defend themselves, and criminals belong in jail where they can't have guns anyway.
So the problem isn't guns, it's CORRECTIONS.
SovereignStatesman 1 month ago
@Pro3110 " Every year, more than 2,400,000 people in the United States use a gun to defend themselves against criminals--or more than 6,500 people a day"
Where is the reference link for the claim cited in this legislation ?
DeathToTeaBaggers 2 months ago
@DeathToTeaBaggers LMAO have YOU even offered any valid points or are you just saying shit like "oh your a nut". Here is the difference between you and Pro3110. I've actually seen statistics in his comments. i've only seen insults in yours. You're an imbecile.
lizardman563 2 months ago 11
@DeathToTeaBaggers
You can google it as easily as the next guy. I gave the name of the bill, the reference number, and HR number. Besides, the more you read about it, the more that you'll see how the anti-gun lobby has manipulated many of these stats into what appears as a logical approach to the banning of firearms, when, in reality, the whole truth is that the more guns in private hands, the fewer the crimes and the lower the murder rates.
Pro3110 2 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@Pro3110 Dude I'm not talking about what some teabgger politico claimed in a bill I'm taking about the actual proof of his claim . Or did you just take his word for it like a sheeple ?
i can't even recall the last time I heard of someone on the news defending themselves or saving anyone with a firearm and I live in a major metropolitan area, let alone people doing it to the tune of 6,500 a DAY ! That's ludicrous and asinine.
DeathToTeaBaggers 2 months ago
@DeathToTeaBaggers
It was a 2003 bill, years prior to the creation of the Tea Party movement.
Go get a little bit of knowledge so that others with knowledge can speak intelligently with you. It is rare for the AP to pick up these stories, because they want people to think the way you do (a perfect example of their success). The next time you pick up an American Rifleman mag, check out their "Armed Citizen" column. It's highlights of that month's self-defensive uses of weapons.
Pro3110 2 months ago 4
@Pro3110 So where did the congressman get the statistical information he used in his bill ? What was his source ? It's a simple question you seem unable to answer.
DeathToTeaBaggers 2 months ago
@DeathToTeaBaggers
Why are you even asking me instead of the bill's author? Ask him. He's got a web-site, like they all do.
Pro3110 2 months ago 3
@Pro3110 Why am i asking you, are your srs ? I'm asking you because you're the guy who sourced it like it was the gospel truth that's why..sheesh..DUH !
DeathToTeaBaggers 2 months ago
@DeathToTeaBaggers
Yes, why are you asking me instead of the author? Sheesh, it's not like I'm the author of it now, am I? (Duh!)
Pro3110 2 months ago 4
@Pro3110 Forget it. You're either being disingenuously obtuse or you're a moron. Take your pick.
DeathToTeaBaggers 2 months ago
@DeathToTeaBaggers
Or, maybe, you're just know figuring out that I don't have the ESP required to answer your inane question. Ask the author.
Pro3110 2 months ago 3
@DeathToTeaBaggers I'm just curious; are you that stupid?
TheSwedishAssassin 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These numbers include the suicides that are committed with firearms, which is even higher than the murder rate with firearm. Over half of the firearm deaths in the US are the result of suicide.
Per FBI, 2004:
Justifiable homicide--480 By law enforcement--337 By private citizen--143 (They usually don't shoot to kill)
Murder--10,100
Suicide--16,750!!!!
Accident--649
These are death rates only, and don't reflect defensive uses which don't end in death.
Pro3110 2 months ago 8
Comment removed
Pro3110 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OMFG Obama taking away guns?
This shall not stand!
multiHappyHacker 3 months ago
GREAT VIDEO , ONE OF YOUR BEST , LOVE IT
bullenchris18 3 months ago 2
Gun control isn't possible. People will get shot if they try to take weapons away from citizens. Plus you can't keep the guns away from the criminals. Impossible!
4squaredby4times4 3 months ago
im a rapist , yea i own a gun
TheBigPicture1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He's right! As a progressive witnessing the treatment of the occupy oakland protesters, I'd say its time for the American left to arms ourselves. The defense of assembly is being threatened in all corners whether it be to protest or to join fellow workers in union. The growing militia threat growing from the right is cause for concern for any actual freedom loving American.
The fact is conservatives use the gun issue to win over easily impressionable rednecks. yes i meant to rednecks.
DennisfromDC 3 months ago
I like this guy! lol
wolfsoldier79 3 months ago
when it comes to a difference of opinions the guy with the gun doesn't win, the guy that has more justification for his position wins.
unless you define win as dead or alive.
moron.(i love guns btw)
AcceptSolitude 3 months ago
Where did this Steven Crowder go. Can we have him back please? The new one is kinda lame. :(
Keepseeker 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
statistics show your more likely to shoot a family member than a burglar or a rapist
Mrinebriation 3 months ago
@Mrinebriation There are 1500 deaths due to firearm accidents a year,people stop thousands and thousands of criminals a year with guns,please if your going to try to make a point research the topic.
Kidwitha12gauge 3 months ago 4
@Kidwitha12gauge i highly doubt civilians stop thousand of crimes and if they do, not all crimes should be stopped with a guns. and if you dont feel safe get a taser gun, that way there is less of a chance you will kill a family member or a stranger and you will be able to stop criminals.
Mrinebriation 3 months ago
@Mrinebriation You keep your little taser toy,when someone breaks into my house im using my 12 gauge.
If you feel safe with a taser you are mentally insane,you think a taser is going to stop one thats on drugs?Can you use a taser on several people at once?When something goes bump in the night and you have a 12 gauge next to a taser which are you going to grab?If you pick the taser you are asking for someone to murder you and your family.
Kidwitha12gauge 3 months ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Kidwitha12gauge first of all your comment is hilarious second of all your argument is not logical
and im just saying you can use a security system or taser gun there several options that can be used to keep you safe and reduce the number of gun related accidents
Mrinebriation 3 months ago
@Mrinebriation First of all,your grammar is horrible,second a taser is not going to stop someone on major drugs.
If you want to risk your life and your family by using your little toy go ahead,but im not that stupid.
Kidwitha12gauge 3 months ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Kidwitha12gauge name one fucking drug that can help the user resist a taser. and if somebody does enter your house and tries to steal from would it not be more appropriate to incapacitate him and let the cops handle it instead blowing his brains out he maybe a child he maybe mentally handicapped and not to mention you can use a security system and if people did that the number of accidental death would decrease and people would still be secure. if that sound unreasonable then i apologize
Mrinebriation 3 months ago
@Mrinebriation Pcp,meth or a high dosage of coke could cause the taser to be ineffective.
And tasers have 1 shot,what if you miss?What if there are two people?What if the robber has a gun?
Kidwitha12gauge 3 months ago 3
@Kidwitha12gauge now i want you to honestly tell me which of the following scenarios is more likely to happen a person who injected huge amounts of meth into his system somehow manages to still have the mental dexterity to use a gun goes into your house bypass your security system with his mad hacking skills and manages to withstand 500000 volts then proceeds to kill you. Or you shoot a rat or an Innocent person.
also if 4 or 5 people go into your house with guns your dead no matter what
Mrinebriation 3 months ago
@Mrinebriation You're claiming self defense against a drug user is "improbable" but then cite the idea of 4-5 people breaking in, of which you then claim you are dead already, so you might as well just sit there and take it.
Its like you control advocates don't even try to come up with coherent or rational responses. It's always we have to go out of harms way to protect criminals. You also seem to think shit like ADT gives you force shields and doesn't just call 911 for you.
MachShot1337 3 months ago 2
@Mrinebriation First off,security systems don't work,they scare off pussies.
Second meth heads break into houses all the time.
3rd tasers are illegal to own in several states,including PA
4th If 4 people break into my house im not dead,the 12 gauge holds 5 shots and I have another 4 on the stock,that is 6 rounds of oo buckshot and 3 slugs,I would end up taking all of them out.
Kidwitha12gauge 3 months ago 2
@Kidwitha12gauge ya and im sure the 4 people with gubs will stand and wait while you take them out
Mrinebriation 3 months ago
@Mrinebriation My shotgun holds 6 rounds,I can shoot all of them,accurately,in 3-4 seconds,and thats at 30 yards im sure when someone is within 10 yards of me I can unload my gun quicker.
You want to come up with more "points" so I can continue to shoot them down?I can do it all day,im used to making liberals feel stupid,im a pro at it.
Kidwitha12gauge 3 months ago
@Kidwitha12gauge they probably how to use and are just as quick at it as you or even if their slightly slower they have numbers on their side so i doubt you will be able to do anything what if you are sleeping since criminals come at night and smart ones dont make any noise you will be dead before you know it, but if you had an alarm system they wont wait for your neighbors and cops to come they will just run
Mrinebriation 3 months ago
@Mrinebriation First off criminals don't know how to use guns very well,they steal them and then think you just point and shoot.
And I have a 65lb boxer and a 60lb husky German shepard mix,If someone takes a piss on my lawn I will know about it.
Kidwitha12gauge 3 months ago
@Kidwitha12gauge i checked on the thing you said about how drugs can help you resist 50000 volts and i could not find any evidence to suggest that is the truth.please check the statistics and you will see that guns do more harm than good. also you can not prepare for every situation people with more protections more guns than you have died because of a single bullet that threat will always remain no matter what you do, and i support stricter gun control but i do not support the banning of guns
Mrinebriation 3 months ago
@Mrinebriation What is gun control going to do?If you haven't noticed criminals don't follow the laws,so if they see they can't own a certain gun do you think that will stop them?And maybe you need to search a little more,and maybe you should check the stats because guns save people every day.
If someone is raping your sister and im there,do you want me to draw a gun and shoot him or do you want me to walk away?
Kidwitha12gauge 2 months ago
@Kidwitha12gauge im just saying if we have stricter back ground checks criminals would have less guns because most criminals get their guns through legal means and i checked fact every thing seem to indicate the guns do more harm than good please search through reliable sources and then make judgment. i would like to ask you something why stop at wimpy shot guns why not missile launcher or a nuke i mean the second amendment did not specify which "arms" we can have
Mrinebriation 2 months ago
@Mrinebriation You do know the background checks go through FBI and ATF right?You are a complete idiot,most criminals get their guns by stealing them or buying them from drug dealers,who stole them.
And thousands of people a year are saved by firearms,if you want those people dead continue to support stricter gun control,your just as guilty as criminals.
Kidwitha12gauge 2 months ago 3
@Kidwitha12gauge a lot of criminals do get their gun illegally but most do not. and why the fuck do you keep citing sources you have not checked
Mrinebriation 2 months ago
@Mrinebriation
Why do you keep spouting alcohol-induced delusions as being facts?
If they are criminals, then any gun they possess is illegally obtained. (DUH!) Therefore, any gun crime committed by a previously convicted criminal is, by law, committed with an illegally obtained gun.
According to the 1997 Survey of State Prison Inmates, among those possessing a gun, the source of the gun was from an illegal source for 80%.
Pro3110 2 months ago 3
@Mrinebriation Your previous post states "stricter background checks means criminals would have less guns because they get their guns legallyy" make up your mind,is it most or some?
And what source do I need?I know for a fact how background checks work and I know for a fact thousands of people are alive today because of their gun.
Remember,Hitler was a fan of gun control.
Kidwitha12gauge 2 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@Kidwitha12gauge Hitler was a fan of Christianity so what
Mrinebriation 2 months ago
@Mrinebriation Nice come back,are you done?Its clear to me I have won this and you're a complete moron,you have not made a valid point.I can continue to do this for weeks if you like,but its going to be the same thing,you say something idiotic I say something that makes sense.
Kidwitha12gauge 2 months ago 3
@Mrinebriation he was also a fan of killing catholics, who are technically christians, so what
CWScott24 2 months ago 2
Comment removed
MrDonneiDarko 2 months ago
@MrDonneiDarko i was pointing out what hitler was against or for is not realty relevant
Mrinebriation 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mrinebriation
PCP. People's muscles have constricted so violently on that drug that they've broken their own bones, makes them dang near impervious to pain, and causes hallucinations that render them incapable of logical thought.
Look up CDC statistics. In 2002, the latest complete stats, in the US there were 762 accidental gun deaths and 2.5 Million in the same year to defend oneself. Facts ruin the anti-gunner's claims.
Pro3110 3 months ago 5
@Mrinebriation Also, every week over a thousand violent crimes are prevented from self defense, every WEEK despite your "high doubts". And the vast majority of the time no shots are fired, its simply the threat of shooting the criminal. You would know this if you could look up facts, but if you knew facts, you wouldn't be for hampering the natural right to self defense.
Move to CA or NY or some other high crime + control state if you really think restricting civil liberties decreases crime.
MachShot1337 3 months ago 2
@MachShot1337 i live in california and i never had to use gun, but my house does have a security system also show me the source of the statistic you mentioned
Mrinebriation 3 months ago
@Mrinebriation
Guns are used nearly twice as much in defense than they are used for undue assault.
Over 1,000,000 times a year in defense.
So I apologize, I lied, I way understated it before. Its not +1000, its closer to 3000.
"hurr I never needed a gun"
A single person isn't aggregate statistics. That alarm system you have will only get the police to your house 30 seconds faster, and burglars aren't afraid of less-than-lethal stun guns.
MachShot1337 3 months ago 3
@MachShot1337 show me a credited source for the statistics you are making up and ill admit you are right
Mrinebriation 3 months ago
@Mrinebriation I did.
MachShot1337 3 months ago 3
@Mrinebriation
You can find reliable sources through the FBI, Interpol, the CDC, National Sheriff's Association, the DOJ, the Harvard Institute of Law and Policy, and NationMaster.
They all prove the same thing. That the anti-gunner's don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to the truth.
The Nat. Sher. Assoc. states that the armed citizen prevents crime SEVEN times more often than a police officer does. Enlighten yourself, please.
Pro3110 3 months ago 4
@Pro3110 give me one link to a reliable source
Mrinebriation 3 months ago
@Mrinebriation
Are you so inebriated so early in the day that you cannot look them up with me providing the sources already? Or are you so much of a liberal that you expect everyone to take care of you and do things for you that you won't do them yourself?
You know YT won't let links be posted. I gave you the sources. Do something for yourself for a change and get enlightened. My daughter could have looked them up by the time she was ten, without my assistance. Do the same.
Pro3110 3 months ago 4
@Pro3110 i looked it up and the fbi estimates that roughly 5 crimes are stopped by gun owners in the us every year and there is roughly 15000 accidental deaths caused by guns thats why im asking for a credibale source cause every source i fined points to the fact that you are either ignorant or a lying
so please give me a credible source and ill admit you are right
Mrinebriation 3 months ago
Comment removed
Pro3110 2 months ago
Comment removed
Pro3110 2 months ago
@Pro3110 you said the armed citizens prevent crime SEVEN times more than the police, there is not a SINGLE reliable website that suggests that is the truth. and if you look it up you will realize that guns are used accidentally a lot more than they are used for self defense.
Mrinebriation 2 months ago
@Mrinebriation
I didn't say it. The National Sheriff's Association says it.
Pro3110 2 months ago 4