Andromeda Gerät,with Haunebu and vril typs,what have ufos to do with aliens? Maybe nothing,maybe the mankind made this self,the (aliens+ufo) together....
People see objekts in the sky,and cannot identified what it is,an then they sey ,It MUST be Aliens,this is so stupid,but mankind and Hollywood movies made this.
Why do you erase my comments in the sense that ADAMSKI was a stupid attention whore who put together all this fraudulent images to lure people into listening to him?
Why do you erase my comments in the sense that JPRichardson was a stupid attention whore who put together all this fraudulent images to lure people into listening to him?
There was a larger more sinister agenda going on here ! Adamski was some kind of puppet. Check out his companionship with Desmond Leslie (who by the way was a cousin of Winston Churchill)! Check out his connections with the CIA and FBI. And why those Haunebu UFOs ? And that is only the beginning of a different (and yet) untold story. We have to grab a larger perspective here. Adamskis own little sci-fi story is only amusing, especially for the childish mind.
"Our (Jewish) race is the MASTER RACE. We are *DIVINE GODS on this planet. We are as different from the INFERIOR RACES as they are from INSECTS. In fact, compared to our race, other races are BEASTS & AMIMALS, CATTLE AT BEST. Other races are considered as HUMAN EXCREMENT. Our DESTINY is to RULE OVER THE INFERIOR RACES. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by OUR LEADER with a *ROD OF IRON. THE MASSES WILL LICK OUR FEET & SERVE US AS OUR SLAVES"
Those pics were real German world war 2crafts. However looking at Adamski videos of these crafts in action are ovious fakes. I belive that Adamski was working for someone in order to cause massive confusion about UFOs. Think about it, showing real picture and than faking the videos is done so that the whole thing is discredited in general. I think there was alot of people who didnt want the general public to know about German UFOs and thats where Adamski came into play.
Look up Nephilim-Watchers-Sons of God. They were fallen angels that gave man knowledge-the ancient texts and drawings show their craft. These are demonic dont be tricked look up the keys words ufo fallen angel.
complete crap. just like uri geller who claimed he can bend spoons (and has been debunked), this guy was an attention-seeker and nothing more. it is so striking that those "ufos" he photographed are typical 50s design in shape and appearance. something from out of space should be really expected to be more fance, don't you think so?
@JPRichardson: I noticed a stirking similarity between Meier's and Adamski's photos. Now, I've looked into the Meier case in depth, and overall it's quite convincing. I've only just heard of Adamski, though, so I don't know if he's using Meier's photos (or vice-versa) or if, just possibly, he was talking to the same ETs (being even-handed and assuming the case unproved either way, the possibility that both men saw the same ETs has to be considered). How do we know Adamski was a fraud?
@JCLeSinge Adamski's case happened 20 years before Meier. Both hoaxes have been debunked and exposed sufficiently. Event the models used by Meier to produce his infamous films were discovered and proved to be nothing but everyday stupid common objects.
@JPRichardson: What about the sound effects on Meir's tapes? They were recorded before the invention of the synthesizer; no one at that time could make or had heard that kind of sound. Likewise, the "special effects"; at the time, Meier's techniques would have been decades ahead of Hollywood. Then there's the saucer interior shots... very interested to know how Meier was able to produce those massive sets, working with one arm and no budget.
The first electronic synthesizer was invented in 1876, and became common in the 1930's and '40's. Nonetheless, the sounds recorded by Meier could very well come from a more common source, a regular sw radio. The films have been replicated using simple models suspended from strings. I know of Meier's case since it became news and have never seen a picture of anything that resembles the interior of an UFO. His pictures of dinosaurs, pleyadians and "cake" UFos are ridiculous.
@JPRichardson: Ok, good answer on the synthesizer, but I did my research into Meier with the help of a very talented film-maker. Meier's videos don't use models on strings; the only way to recreate those kind of shots would be with multiple glass panes, a technique not used in Hollywood until Peckinpah's days. If you've not seen the interior UFO shots, then perhaps you should dig them up and have another look.
@JCLeSinge Whatever floats your boat. Both cases, Meier's and Adamski's are nothing but hoaxes and there is plenty of evidence which you might very well care to consider.
@JPRichardson: Cool. I'm an open-minded skeptic, which means I don't credit anything until there's enough evidence to suggest it *could* be true; once I've seen that, I sit on the fence until I see something conclusive either way. I don't think it's genuine skepticism to demand absolute proof, because that involves cleaving to the prevailing dogma rather than requiring an equal standard of evidence from both sides. So far, what I've seen from Meier is credible enough; I don't know about Adamski.
But you do know that the "Pleiadian" pictures were nothing but images taken from TV, and you do know that the dinosaur pictures where nothing but pics from a children's book. And you do know that his films have been succesfully replicated using nothing but scale models and string. But still you believe Meier's case is credible. You need to be either too ignorant or too naive to buy such crap. Google - Billy - Meier - hoax - and read the results.
@JPRichardson: I said "credible enough"; don't be trying to push me into an extremist position that I don't hold. Some of your points are good; the dinosaur pictures, for example. We've already covered whether the UFO shots can be replicated with models and string; they can't. I've seen attempts, and they're not very good; give me a link if you have a good one. Pictures taken from TV... the tech didn't exist back then. Look at the UFO interior shots, then tell me which TV show they came from.
If you don't know about the "Pleiadian" picture hoax, (chorus girls from the Dean Martin show), then you know very little about the case. I told you, the internet is flooded with information on the hoax, his use of miniatures hanging from strings, pics of his actual models found at his home, how he claims men in black have replaced all his evidence with fake pictures, etc. You can find videos here in youtube: watch?v=mffKi-xtmAE. Also read "Spaceships of the Pleiades - the Billy Meier Story".
@JPRichardson: Ok, I watched the video. Gotta say, I'm not convinced by the host; far too smug, and some of the things he said would be actionable slander. His model UFO looks nothing like Meir's, and having watched some of the videos again just now, I'm more convinced that they weren't done with string. All the points you've made so far are debatable; none of them are proved.
Tell me, just out of interested, what would it take to convince you that a UFO case as true?
A "real" case would produce solid evidence, films of something other than distant metallic plates hanging from wires, photographs of "spaceships" that do not look like airbrushed trash can lids, pictures of "aliens" that are not proven to be taken from a TV set, images which are not blurry or unclear, serious witnesses who are not making money of their "experiences" leading groups of "belevers" that will buy your books and autographs, "extraterrestrial materials" that are not "stolen by MIB's".
@JPRichardson: Ok... Meier's shots don't use wires. Like I said before, I've worked with filmmakers; assuming for a moment that they are fakes, they're more sophisticated than that. And they don't look like trashcans; they look a bit goofy, I'll give you that, but they don't look like trashcan lids. Nor are they proven to be taken from TV; it's alleged, not proved, and modern analysis has failed to show the distinctive three-colour bar pattern of the cathode ray tube that TV shots would have.
@JCLeSinge Honestly, Meier's case is so silly that it is ridiculous to even discuss it. It was proven a hoax in the 80's, and now the internet resuscitates the issue with "new evidence", more phoney videos and pics, and exaplanations about every lie Meier has said over the years. If you are, as you claim a "serious" investigator, you are wasting your time with Meier.
@JPRichardson: "Serious" here implies a depth of investigation that I can't honestly claim; I'm interested, put it that way. As I said before, I don't think that an honest skeptic automatically disbelieves anything that's not conclusively proved; that's a logical fallacy. Honest skepticism is to weigh both sides; while there are dubious points in Meier's account, I've not yet seen him convincingly debunked either.
Thanks for the link; I have ten minutes, I'm watching the video.
@JPRichardson: I've watched it. There were several inconsistencies in the statements made, primarily that the ships in Meier's videos never move; there are numerous videos where the ships do indeed move. Secondly, they stated that there are no interior shots of the "beamships"; this is incorrect, there are interior shots, which casts doubt on the veracity of the other quotes and statements given in the video.
Bear in mind that I'm not saying it's true; just that I've not seen it disproved.
@JCLeSinge Actually, the video never says that "the ships in Meier's videos never move". It says that the infamous "wedding cake UFO " NEVER MOVES. Why? Because it is attached to a tree with wires. But, as my mother used to say, "There are none so blind as those who will not see." Your avoiding to comment on the rest of the debunking evidence says a lot about you. You, my frien, are a "believer".
@JPRichardson: I was just picking the biggest clangers in the video. If the debunkers need to invent evidence and resort to slander, then they don't have a strong case. Sure, there are inconsistencies in Meier's story. How you view that depends on your starting perspective; if you come from the attitude that there is no such thing as ET life, then all UFO sightings, not just Meier's are automatically fakes. If you accept that ET life logically must exist, then any given UFO case could be true.
I believe in ET life, and can still see Meier's case is absurd, his claims childish and his evidence phony. It is called critical thinking. You want too much for it to be real, and your desire blinds your reason.
Hi. I'm looking for original footage of Adamski, and already contacted with Foundation but no answers yet. If you know who should I talk to, please let me know about it. Thanks.
lol 2:44 FAAAAAAAAAAAKE!
CLASSICMONSTERGUY95 3 months ago
Unusual.
moya138 7 months ago
Some of these actually do resemble the alleged Nazi ufo designs.
TheSynthZone 7 months ago
@TheSynthZone - The German UFO hoax is very recent (late 90's) so no wonder they are similar to Adamski's own hoax.
LegionarioCruel 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
la gran mentira
seergio34 7 months ago
DID THE BIG FAT LIAR...EVER CONFESS BEFORE HIS DEATH?
novanine9 9 months ago
Comment removed
VourPT 1 year ago
People who believe in Adamski's claims are idiots. Period.
dmeyerhoff 1 year ago
nazis
Alligatormaximino 1 year ago
sssshhhh a que adamski tan pacheco jajajajaja
soportesdigitales 1 year ago
Andromeda Gerät,with Haunebu and vril typs,what have ufos to do with aliens? Maybe nothing,maybe the mankind made this self,the (aliens+ufo) together....
People see objekts in the sky,and cannot identified what it is,an then they sey ,It MUST be Aliens,this is so stupid,but mankind and Hollywood movies made this.
Gtacrack 1 year ago
This song was number one in Venus for 51,000 years.
Wook5ter 1 year ago 18
@Wook5ter LOL!!! hahahaha
dharcoon 1 year ago
Why do you erase my comments in the sense that ADAMSKI was a stupid attention whore who put together all this fraudulent images to lure people into listening to him?
JPRichardson 1 year ago
Why do you erase my comments in the sense that JPRichardson was a stupid attention whore who put together all this fraudulent images to lure people into listening to him?
Sixalienasa 1 year ago
Which would make you... exactly.
JPRichardson 1 year ago
this all is nazi ufos
relikts4 2 years ago
The "nazi ufos" story was made up in the 90's. Adamski produced his fraudulent images and videos in the 50's.
JPRichardson 1 year ago
@JPRichardson but i think still they are nazi ones
relikts4 1 year ago
good song LOL
relikts4 2 years ago
Fuck You, Adamsky!!!!!!!!
kikelambs 2 years ago
@kikelambs LOL XD
relikts4 1 year ago
Nice collection of Adamski photos.
TheSdenne 2 years ago
É sempre bom ouvir Renato Russo ...já não se fazem mais musicas como as dele ...
ricardortn 2 years ago
There was a larger more sinister agenda going on here ! Adamski was some kind of puppet. Check out his companionship with Desmond Leslie (who by the way was a cousin of Winston Churchill)! Check out his connections with the CIA and FBI. And why those Haunebu UFOs ? And that is only the beginning of a different (and yet) untold story. We have to grab a larger perspective here. Adamskis own little sci-fi story is only amusing, especially for the childish mind.
MrErikius 2 years ago 19
@MrErikius
Indeed.. and GREAT COMMENT!
Very clever..
Now see my channel and learn the connection between Churchhill, Adamski, the CIA, "ET's", "UFO's" and the *JUDEO-Masonic* order....
Learn the secret to reality 101....
mrtruthify 10 months ago
Menachem Begin- ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER 1977–1983:
"Our (Jewish) race is the MASTER RACE. We are *DIVINE GODS on this planet. We are as different from the INFERIOR RACES as they are from INSECTS. In fact, compared to our race, other races are BEASTS & AMIMALS, CATTLE AT BEST. Other races are considered as HUMAN EXCREMENT. Our DESTINY is to RULE OVER THE INFERIOR RACES. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by OUR LEADER with a *ROD OF IRON. THE MASSES WILL LICK OUR FEET & SERVE US AS OUR SLAVES"
mrtruthify 10 months ago
Ships look kind of the same as the nazi ones supposely pictures
LostInMadness220 2 years ago
@LostInMadness220 bicos they are nazi ufos
relikts4 2 years ago
yea always show the ships but not the beings.
Why?are they afraid we might see them for as they truly are.Even with billy Meir it was the same
what are they afraid of.
JohnKillrory 2 years ago
holy! that's why not even aliens holy &$(% kinda zeitgeist then
JSF122386 2 years ago
Those pics were real German world war 2crafts. However looking at Adamski videos of these crafts in action are ovious fakes. I belive that Adamski was working for someone in order to cause massive confusion about UFOs. Think about it, showing real picture and than faking the videos is done so that the whole thing is discredited in general. I think there was alot of people who didnt want the general public to know about German UFOs and thats where Adamski came into play.
Marbus0 2 years ago
definitely german ww2 anti gravity craft,They all are believe me.
staceyfanny 2 years ago
Isn't this the audio for a polish sausage commercial?
nasa0sucks 2 years ago
Ha Ha Ha Great Comment !!!!
ELGOCHORNII 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hey check out my video :o MeetYourFling * COM
dianoupoupou 3 years ago
This Polock music blows.
bassplayeroceanside 3 years ago
tahs a nazi anirgavirty craft
i belibe hanabu bversion 3
not alien
mariduru 3 years ago
the first one is an andromeda gerat,
aktheon 3 years ago
not one of Adamski's videos were real, all staged fakes
b6gm6n 3 years ago
Look up Nephilim-Watchers-Sons of God. They were fallen angels that gave man knowledge-the ancient texts and drawings show their craft. These are demonic dont be tricked look up the keys words ufo fallen angel.
freecounselingonline 4 years ago
complete crap. just like uri geller who claimed he can bend spoons (and has been debunked), this guy was an attention-seeker and nothing more. it is so striking that those "ufos" he photographed are typical 50s design in shape and appearance. something from out of space should be really expected to be more fance, don't you think so?
DoctorPenis 4 years ago
let me guess, a billy meier follower?
SuffererForLove 3 years ago
Billy meier was an Adamski follower. (please censor this comment because it reveals an awful, unbearable truth).
JPRichardson 1 year ago
@JPRichardson: I noticed a stirking similarity between Meier's and Adamski's photos. Now, I've looked into the Meier case in depth, and overall it's quite convincing. I've only just heard of Adamski, though, so I don't know if he's using Meier's photos (or vice-versa) or if, just possibly, he was talking to the same ETs (being even-handed and assuming the case unproved either way, the possibility that both men saw the same ETs has to be considered). How do we know Adamski was a fraud?
JCLeSinge 1 year ago
@JCLeSinge Adamski's case happened 20 years before Meier. Both hoaxes have been debunked and exposed sufficiently. Event the models used by Meier to produce his infamous films were discovered and proved to be nothing but everyday stupid common objects.
JPRichardson 1 year ago
@JPRichardson: What about the sound effects on Meir's tapes? They were recorded before the invention of the synthesizer; no one at that time could make or had heard that kind of sound. Likewise, the "special effects"; at the time, Meier's techniques would have been decades ahead of Hollywood. Then there's the saucer interior shots... very interested to know how Meier was able to produce those massive sets, working with one arm and no budget.
JCLeSinge 1 year ago
The first electronic synthesizer was invented in 1876, and became common in the 1930's and '40's. Nonetheless, the sounds recorded by Meier could very well come from a more common source, a regular sw radio. The films have been replicated using simple models suspended from strings. I know of Meier's case since it became news and have never seen a picture of anything that resembles the interior of an UFO. His pictures of dinosaurs, pleyadians and "cake" UFos are ridiculous.
JPRichardson 1 year ago
@JPRichardson: Ok, good answer on the synthesizer, but I did my research into Meier with the help of a very talented film-maker. Meier's videos don't use models on strings; the only way to recreate those kind of shots would be with multiple glass panes, a technique not used in Hollywood until Peckinpah's days. If you've not seen the interior UFO shots, then perhaps you should dig them up and have another look.
JCLeSinge 1 year ago
@JCLeSinge Whatever floats your boat. Both cases, Meier's and Adamski's are nothing but hoaxes and there is plenty of evidence which you might very well care to consider.
JPRichardson 1 year ago
@JPRichardson: Cool. I'm an open-minded skeptic, which means I don't credit anything until there's enough evidence to suggest it *could* be true; once I've seen that, I sit on the fence until I see something conclusive either way. I don't think it's genuine skepticism to demand absolute proof, because that involves cleaving to the prevailing dogma rather than requiring an equal standard of evidence from both sides. So far, what I've seen from Meier is credible enough; I don't know about Adamski.
JCLeSinge 1 year ago
But you do know that the "Pleiadian" pictures were nothing but images taken from TV, and you do know that the dinosaur pictures where nothing but pics from a children's book. And you do know that his films have been succesfully replicated using nothing but scale models and string. But still you believe Meier's case is credible. You need to be either too ignorant or too naive to buy such crap. Google - Billy - Meier - hoax - and read the results.
JPRichardson 1 year ago
@JPRichardson: I said "credible enough"; don't be trying to push me into an extremist position that I don't hold. Some of your points are good; the dinosaur pictures, for example. We've already covered whether the UFO shots can be replicated with models and string; they can't. I've seen attempts, and they're not very good; give me a link if you have a good one. Pictures taken from TV... the tech didn't exist back then. Look at the UFO interior shots, then tell me which TV show they came from.
JCLeSinge 1 year ago
If you don't know about the "Pleiadian" picture hoax, (chorus girls from the Dean Martin show), then you know very little about the case. I told you, the internet is flooded with information on the hoax, his use of miniatures hanging from strings, pics of his actual models found at his home, how he claims men in black have replaced all his evidence with fake pictures, etc. You can find videos here in youtube: watch?v=mffKi-xtmAE. Also read "Spaceships of the Pleiades - the Billy Meier Story".
JPRichardson 1 year ago
@JPRichardson: Ok, I watched the video. Gotta say, I'm not convinced by the host; far too smug, and some of the things he said would be actionable slander. His model UFO looks nothing like Meir's, and having watched some of the videos again just now, I'm more convinced that they weren't done with string. All the points you've made so far are debatable; none of them are proved.
Tell me, just out of interested, what would it take to convince you that a UFO case as true?
JCLeSinge 1 year ago
A "real" case would produce solid evidence, films of something other than distant metallic plates hanging from wires, photographs of "spaceships" that do not look like airbrushed trash can lids, pictures of "aliens" that are not proven to be taken from a TV set, images which are not blurry or unclear, serious witnesses who are not making money of their "experiences" leading groups of "belevers" that will buy your books and autographs, "extraterrestrial materials" that are not "stolen by MIB's".
JPRichardson 1 year ago
@JPRichardson: Ok... Meier's shots don't use wires. Like I said before, I've worked with filmmakers; assuming for a moment that they are fakes, they're more sophisticated than that. And they don't look like trashcans; they look a bit goofy, I'll give you that, but they don't look like trashcan lids. Nor are they proven to be taken from TV; it's alleged, not proved, and modern analysis has failed to show the distinctive three-colour bar pattern of the cathode ray tube that TV shots would have.
JCLeSinge 1 year ago
@JCLeSinge Honestly, Meier's case is so silly that it is ridiculous to even discuss it. It was proven a hoax in the 80's, and now the internet resuscitates the issue with "new evidence", more phoney videos and pics, and exaplanations about every lie Meier has said over the years. If you are, as you claim a "serious" investigator, you are wasting your time with Meier.
JPRichardson 1 year ago
@JPRichardson: "Serious" here implies a depth of investigation that I can't honestly claim; I'm interested, put it that way. As I said before, I don't think that an honest skeptic automatically disbelieves anything that's not conclusively proved; that's a logical fallacy. Honest skepticism is to weigh both sides; while there are dubious points in Meier's account, I've not yet seen him convincingly debunked either.
Thanks for the link; I have ten minutes, I'm watching the video.
JCLeSinge 1 year ago
@JCLeSinge If you can spare 10 min. of your time, you should also watch these videos: watch?v=XlfiCbSNayw&feature=related watch?v=mydKcR6MArs
JPRichardson 1 year ago
@JPRichardson: I've watched it. There were several inconsistencies in the statements made, primarily that the ships in Meier's videos never move; there are numerous videos where the ships do indeed move. Secondly, they stated that there are no interior shots of the "beamships"; this is incorrect, there are interior shots, which casts doubt on the veracity of the other quotes and statements given in the video.
Bear in mind that I'm not saying it's true; just that I've not seen it disproved.
JCLeSinge 1 year ago
@JCLeSinge Actually, the video never says that "the ships in Meier's videos never move". It says that the infamous "wedding cake UFO " NEVER MOVES. Why? Because it is attached to a tree with wires. But, as my mother used to say, "There are none so blind as those who will not see." Your avoiding to comment on the rest of the debunking evidence says a lot about you. You, my frien, are a "believer".
JPRichardson 1 year ago
@JPRichardson: I was just picking the biggest clangers in the video. If the debunkers need to invent evidence and resort to slander, then they don't have a strong case. Sure, there are inconsistencies in Meier's story. How you view that depends on your starting perspective; if you come from the attitude that there is no such thing as ET life, then all UFO sightings, not just Meier's are automatically fakes. If you accept that ET life logically must exist, then any given UFO case could be true.
JCLeSinge 1 year ago
I believe in ET life, and can still see Meier's case is absurd, his claims childish and his evidence phony. It is called critical thinking. You want too much for it to be real, and your desire blinds your reason.
JPRichardson 1 year ago 2
Shill account for drpenis!
77GSlinger 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey Man!,
bang some local babes near you!.. i-fling * com (remove the * replace with . )
R57365531
xdollix 4 years ago
THE MUSIC SOUNDS GYPSY!!!!
panos6662000 4 years ago
It's Brazilian. Quite a flat and banal tune and a very poor choice for these outlandish images. They would have required some intense music.
AnaKosta 3 years ago
I'm from Brazil and I agree that this music sucks much balls.. lol
we have a lot of better things
Luckzzz 3 years ago
Andromeda-Gerat(Cigar ufo)And Haunebu II or project Luft-46 (Flying Saucer)By SS and Luftwaffe in WWII
JSF122386 4 years ago
Hi. I'm looking for original footage of Adamski, and already contacted with Foundation but no answers yet. If you know who should I talk to, please let me know about it. Thanks.
topspincreative 4 years ago