This woman's glasses are fake, it's plain glass. Why is she wearing them? Does she want to look intellectual, so to be taken seriously? Apparently she didn't expect to be taken seriously without these fake glasses.
@jg2904 DNA has been used in criminal investigations since 1984.
Douglas was far too old to play Nick, they should have cast a younger actor like Mel Gibson. I hope Douglas' stage IV throat cancer will return this year, just as it did with George Harrison and Alex Higgins.
@JuanMacready DNA testing wasn't commonly used in criminal investigations until the early/mid 1990s. Joe Eszterhas also wrote the script years before the film came out.
Wishing people dead because you thought they were too old for a role is also about as low as you can sink. If you didn't like Basic Instinct, go watch something else besides a making-of documentary to something you didn't like in the first place.
@jg2904 DNA was used to convict Colin Pitchfork of murder in 1988, four years before this stupid film was set.
Michael Douglas is a talentless libtard kike who only got into films because of his father. His cancer is very likely to return at any time over the next three years. It was this film that gave him the Big C.
@JuanMacready You seem to have missed the words "commonly" and "common" in both of my previous replies so I will repeat it again, DNA testing wasn't common at the time. Watch other films from the era that have no mention of DNA testing, such as Presumed Innocent.
Not liking somebody's politics, lifestyle, or career is still no valid reason to wish a man death. His two Oscars also beg to differ with your conclusions of him being "talentless", jackass.
@jg2904 The cancer-ridden kike only got to produce One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest because his father owned the rights to it. His Oscar for Wall Street was a joke.
In real life the character Catherine would be considered retarded. Anyway it was quite obvious from the very beginning who the murderer was.
@JuanMacready Wow... There is seriously something wrong with you. I would gladly discuss Douglas's acting talent and might even agree with some of your arguments, but are totally clueless as to the message of my comments? Libtard? Kike? I'm no left-winger, but Jesus...
jg2904 out... I'm not continuing this nutty conversation. And I never considered Catherine the killer in the first place.
ugh, I hate these overprotective people. Overly protective gays and overly protective feminists. They have something in common; without knowing they give themselves tags and they put themselves in bad positions by not allowing women or queers to behave in a certain fashion because it gives a bad name. Not looking at individual characters but at gender and sexuality. So they practically do the same...they discriminate
Awesome movie, the gay and lesbians had it wrong they acted like children and the efforts did nothing to change anything but make them look like idiots.
@Messylin Oh me too! I CRINGE whenever her miserable, po-face comes on! Ruining the movie by giving the ending away, 'really isn't our problem'. Then who's problem is it exactly? If somebody had attempted to tell me the ending of this movie when I entered upon seeing it for the first time in 1992 ...well, I wouldn't be held responsible for my ice-pick-wielding frenzy..!
Oh get over yourself! I was 17 and had just come out when this movie hit the cinemas! Homophobic? Yeah, it sure is...but it's also misogynistic, anti-male, misanthropic, immoral and totally FABULOUS! When she comments about 'far' things have come due to all the work she did - 'Ellen' and 'Will and Grace' -both totally sterile and sexless! Every gay man and lesbian I know - and I know a LOT - LOVES this movie!
Pretty stupid to protest a movie in the making. You can only judge it after you have seen it. And I also think it's kinda hypocrit for gay people to protest artistic freedom. Out of all people you wouldn't expect them to be so negative. I thought gay ment happy...
I wonder if this broad figured out that the movie was a mystery therefore you name the killer that no one wants to see the movie because you can't solve the mystery if you know who did it.
Gay was not the point, the straight detective was an alcoholic and a drug addict, that wasn't damning straight people.Gay /Straight each had their faults. I'm gay, the twists and the turns was what it was about, the details were the trimmings. I loved the power it gave gay people, instead of lisping ninnies it made us look cool.
What is this stupid woman complaining about? I'd like her to specify what elements she considers homophobic. If they'd made Roxy heterosexual nobody would have given a shit. Jeez...again, these people make me feel embarrassed about being gay... but then again, us homosexuals don't have anything more in common than the fact that we are attracted to people of the same sex!
For all her smugness, the dumbass bitch didn't seem to realize that the film has an ambigious ending. "katherine did it" didn't make a difference to anyone who watched the film.
She is protesting and she is gay. She is weird. Catherine is a character in a film. Gay people are too defensive. My goodness. You might as well protest ALL films that portray any one type of person in a bad light. My goodness gracious! This is why some people don't like gay people. That's right all gay people are murderers. :)
This woman's glasses are fake, it's plain glass. Why is she wearing them? Does she want to look intellectual, so to be taken seriously? Apparently she didn't expect to be taken seriously without these fake glasses.
TaoPiet 6 months ago
The funniest thing is that these people thought they could destroy a film by giving away the ending.
drainfunk 7 months ago
It was a stupid movie, they would have jailed Catherine using DNA.
So glad Michael Douglas has terminal stage IV throat cancer which has spread to his lymph nodes.
JuanMacready 1 year ago
@JuanMacready DNA testing wasn't common at the time, jackass. I hope nobody is wishing you die of cancer, though I could understand why they would.
jg2904 11 months ago
@jg2904 DNA has been used in criminal investigations since 1984.
Douglas was far too old to play Nick, they should have cast a younger actor like Mel Gibson. I hope Douglas' stage IV throat cancer will return this year, just as it did with George Harrison and Alex Higgins.
JuanMacready 11 months ago
@JuanMacready DNA testing wasn't commonly used in criminal investigations until the early/mid 1990s. Joe Eszterhas also wrote the script years before the film came out.
Wishing people dead because you thought they were too old for a role is also about as low as you can sink. If you didn't like Basic Instinct, go watch something else besides a making-of documentary to something you didn't like in the first place.
jg2904 11 months ago
@jg2904 DNA was used to convict Colin Pitchfork of murder in 1988, four years before this stupid film was set.
Michael Douglas is a talentless libtard kike who only got into films because of his father. His cancer is very likely to return at any time over the next three years. It was this film that gave him the Big C.
JuanMacready 11 months ago
Comment removed
jg2904 11 months ago
@JuanMacready You seem to have missed the words "commonly" and "common" in both of my previous replies so I will repeat it again, DNA testing wasn't common at the time. Watch other films from the era that have no mention of DNA testing, such as Presumed Innocent.
Not liking somebody's politics, lifestyle, or career is still no valid reason to wish a man death. His two Oscars also beg to differ with your conclusions of him being "talentless", jackass.
jg2904 11 months ago
@jg2904 The cancer-ridden kike only got to produce One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest because his father owned the rights to it. His Oscar for Wall Street was a joke.
In real life the character Catherine would be considered retarded. Anyway it was quite obvious from the very beginning who the murderer was.
JuanMacready 11 months ago
@JuanMacready Wow... There is seriously something wrong with you. I would gladly discuss Douglas's acting talent and might even agree with some of your arguments, but are totally clueless as to the message of my comments? Libtard? Kike? I'm no left-winger, but Jesus...
jg2904 out... I'm not continuing this nutty conversation. And I never considered Catherine the killer in the first place.
jg2904 11 months ago
@jg2904 It was a bit obvious considering it was Sharon Stone in the opening sequence.
JuanMacready 11 months ago
@JuanMacready Go back and watch it, you never see the face of the woman.
jg2904 11 months ago
@jg2904 You do actually. And Stone, Paul Verhoeven and Joe Eszterhas have all admitted it was her.
JuanMacready 11 months ago
@JuanMacready
WTF is wrong with you. You want someone's cancer to come back.. I hope you walk out into traffic and get mowed down by a bus shit-head.. Get a life..
dbreiden83080 8 months ago
ugh, I hate these overprotective people. Overly protective gays and overly protective feminists. They have something in common; without knowing they give themselves tags and they put themselves in bad positions by not allowing women or queers to behave in a certain fashion because it gives a bad name. Not looking at individual characters but at gender and sexuality. So they practically do the same...they discriminate
Laroling 1 year ago
Awesome movie, the gay and lesbians had it wrong they acted like children and the efforts did nothing to change anything but make them look like idiots.
Vexara 1 year ago
what a bunch paranoid faggots - they are the oppressors
sparklebucket 1 year ago
The verbal activist in glasses is acting like a pretentious asshole. I'm embarrased for her.
Messylin 1 year ago
@Messylin Oh me too! I CRINGE whenever her miserable, po-face comes on! Ruining the movie by giving the ending away, 'really isn't our problem'. Then who's problem is it exactly? If somebody had attempted to tell me the ending of this movie when I entered upon seeing it for the first time in 1992 ...well, I wouldn't be held responsible for my ice-pick-wielding frenzy..!
carlynorris 1 year ago
Oh get over yourself! I was 17 and had just come out when this movie hit the cinemas! Homophobic? Yeah, it sure is...but it's also misogynistic, anti-male, misanthropic, immoral and totally FABULOUS! When she comments about 'far' things have come due to all the work she did - 'Ellen' and 'Will and Grace' -both totally sterile and sexless! Every gay man and lesbian I know - and I know a LOT - LOVES this movie!
carlynorris 1 year ago 5
@carlynorris its funny if this movie was today it wouldnt have a word said, and Now all these people are eating there words on this movie
Pinkranger87 1 year ago
Invaluable free promotion.
HS22181 1 year ago
God they so dumb the movie is about woman whose killer and can manipulate the people around her
Pinkranger87 2 years ago
She would never have got away with it in reality.
PeterFirthFan 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It was a stupid film anyway.
PeterFirthFan 2 years ago
Pretty stupid to protest a movie in the making. You can only judge it after you have seen it. And I also think it's kinda hypocrit for gay people to protest artistic freedom. Out of all people you wouldn't expect them to be so negative. I thought gay ment happy...
ralphvds 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
gay means sick
dvariets 2 years ago
lol yep
southlondonpimp 2 years ago
My dear god honey how incredibly stupid are you? A very literate but ridiculous woman speaking total nonsense...
prelestnost 2 years ago
Paul verhoeven is a very good director!!!
DMCpro6944 2 years ago
I wonder if this broad figured out that the movie was a mystery therefore you name the killer that no one wants to see the movie because you can't solve the mystery if you know who did it.
PeterBluth 2 years ago
Gay was not the point, the straight detective was an alcoholic and a drug addict, that wasn't damning straight people.Gay /Straight each had their faults. I'm gay, the twists and the turns was what it was about, the details were the trimmings. I loved the power it gave gay people, instead of lisping ninnies it made us look cool.
launwatch 2 years ago 9
by the way, the phrase "blonde poison" is from NIETZSCHE!
German philosophy!
absurdicion 3 years ago
What is this stupid woman complaining about? I'd like her to specify what elements she considers homophobic. If they'd made Roxy heterosexual nobody would have given a shit. Jeez...again, these people make me feel embarrassed about being gay... but then again, us homosexuals don't have anything more in common than the fact that we are attracted to people of the same sex!
cassylvira 3 years ago 2
she just needs a good fuck!
vibrators make people dumber
absurdicion 3 years ago 10
For all her smugness, the dumbass bitch didn't seem to realize that the film has an ambigious ending. "katherine did it" didn't make a difference to anyone who watched the film.
Atripple 3 years ago 2
She is protesting and she is gay. She is weird. Catherine is a character in a film. Gay people are too defensive. My goodness. You might as well protest ALL films that portray any one type of person in a bad light. My goodness gracious! This is why some people don't like gay people. That's right all gay people are murderers. :)
80stimeagain 3 years ago 3
it was a great piece of art of my hometown
8data 3 years ago