@lossofframe I am still engaged in the free energy research with this rotor disc. It is inconlusive as yet. No yes no no. I still believe a magnet motor like this might work engaging gravity and inertial oscillation as well in the circuit as Finsrud's PM suggests. Therefore read the title as 'free energy research magnet motor', it is evidently not a finished product or experiment.
the "little bit of extra energ" that drives the "motor" comes from inertia.... If you can get it going fast enough to produce a strong electrical current... you might have something....F=ma is a simple idea...If the current being created can generate a higher output force than the input force used to get it going, you might have something....your going to need a good kick start lol
I was doing experiments like this 20 years ago. You eventually figure out people these things require an energy source to make whatever is in line 1st SPIN. the guy here admits it from day1 of video. You cannot have a perpetual motion machine. They dont exist
@shiznitbitslap No not on magnetism alone, nor on gravity alone, but combined with inertial oscillation maybe. that is my actual stand. There is a precedent for this. The point is that Finsrud claims and demonstrates he has made one. See my other vids.
@100roberthenry yes, at present I am trying with a linkage with an axle directed upwards that gives feedback to a pendulum that moves the stator in combination with an inertial oscillator. There are many hurdles to take if this would be possible at all, and I haven't taken them all as yet.
@Proxy2013 Yes I am doing that, but gravity needs to play a part, as well as inertial oscillation. No success as yet. As for now Finsrud could not be confirmed by my experiments.
@anandaadhar might it be able to use other forms of energy to use energy from the large rotor to power the top rotor? example... if u could generate electricity from the large rotor to turn a small engine that powers the top rotor. i dont know if it could generate enough electricity though. or if u could find a material that reacts to light, and have the top rotor made out of it, while having the large rotor powering a light that shines on the top rotor and makes it spin, just random thoughts...
@blackgaymidgetjew First of all you need movement to have electricity to control the forces, but certain is that just magnetism will not be the original source of that movement leading to an electric current. Gravity alone will neither lead to such a result. What remains is the testing of the hypothesis that natural time delivers us a universe of gravitational fields and magnetic fields that apparently is in a state of perpetual motion. Tesla told us to hook up our machines to this wheel work.
My research proves that almost all overunity devices draw their extra energy from the potential energy of the local gravitational field. And to describe them in full scientific detail, it is required to revise the Maxwells equations of Electromagnetism to no-linear equations, and Einstein's theory of gravitation. So for the academic world to account for them it is required 1-3 nobels...
Until somebody finds a way to press the static force of magnetism into a dynamic search for its equilibrium revealing a new law: the conservation of movement law (for all of the universe is in consant flux)
Isn't free energy. You have to control that one thing to keep it in motion. That takes energy since you have to move it. Our motions are not without energy! Even if you did setup a coil with that or something voltage would be minimal.
The idea is that the magnetic reactionforce can be stored and distributed in a feedback loop. The drive for the stator pulse takes very little energy. If that energy is less than the energy we get from the magnetic reactionforce we're done. This is a theory. But as yet it has not been confirmed by this experiment. The theory can be wrong, the implementation can be wrong. I takes a lot of trials to prove an exception to the law of conservation. How to pick this magnetic lock?
You know to create your gas, Nuclear, and any other type of fuel requires energy to gather and produce it. The point isn't to create perpetual motion devices but alternative means of energy without the cost of Fuel... Free in other words. If you simply build a power plant out of a system like that you could use a minimal amount of energy into starting it out and then never again needed as long as the system is running. And if more of these are built they can start other new systems.
It's kind of like a Jet Engine. Most of them can't start themselves on, they require another smaller engine that can start on its own to produce the motion for the main shaft of the Jet Engine before it can start compressing the air in the shaft to ignite the mixture and produce the rotation on its own. Whether the airplane is on Ground power or using the APU it still needs that external power to simply start it's own power plants. This could be the same when on no need for external.
google proof of overunity there are a few math papers on it , its been 'prooven' for some time now , spend less time flamin more time learnin ? thats all the maker of the vid is doing and the people watching , not the flamers though they have learned all there is to know and made them into laws , taking the mystery outa liffe must be why there so bitter when something new comes along . the same people would have been supriesd when electricity was invented.
Maybe indeed the crank principle isn't the right one for a magnetic motor. We are used to thinking in terms of the combustion engine. But this crank system of alternating for a smooth run is not the drive of the machine. The explosion of gas in the combustion engine is. So what does this for the magnetic motor? Where does the kick come from that we would have to crank up? At present I study Howard Johnson to figure this out. watch?v=mAhe1nX0HLM
The strength of the magnetic field on the axis of rotation of your wheel (the vertical axis in the video) is not uniform and you give energy to the wheel by wobbling around another magnet with your hands. There's nothing strange about it. It's just a a magnetic crank.
So it seems, but other experiments by Johnson and Hamel suggest that that magnetic crank can be pulsed by a certain spacing of the magnets in such a fashion that the collapsing fields in the spaces elicit a kick of space energy that can be harnessed for a motor. That is the effect we are looking for. We look into the parameters defining such an action. We look for a law of nature that as yet has escaped our scientific scrutiny. This disc is just one of the many possible magnetic setups for this.
Unfortunately the wheel is still moved by his hand. If the machine worked we would not be seeing this unfinished design, he would be rich. The only way to make a magnetic motor which uses no fuel is to find a substance which could screen the fields to stop magnetic attraction/repulsion.
But surely pulling the field apart requires exactly the same force gained from attraction, off centre rotors do the same. If one was to find a way of making this work the machine would run to destruction if under no load.
Yes, nothing will really happen unless another force is involved to pulsate the magnet rotor. This, intelligently done - and that is the whole point - can be gravity, inertia, or a combination of both that together with the magetism create a vibratin that sustains in converting the space of time energy of nature into kinetic energy. The research question here is whether we can break the equivalence principle this way and thus achieve overuniy. As yet it is just theory and failing experiments.
So you are trying to tap the forces of space-time energy to work the gate? Clever stuff indeed, I must keep watch on your progress and I wish you success.
First, I didn't watch all of your videos, so please correct me if you addressed this. The "overunity" machines that I've seen built (including yours) all take advantage of, to some extent, the energy contained in the ordering of the domains of the magnets (the reason they're magnets), which is not unlimited (ALL magnets lose their magnetism). I encourage you to create a machine that harnesses earth's gravity and (small) magnetic field as energy, there is where the hope is.
Right you are, i agree, and that is what I am trying at the moment. My latest video prepares for this option: watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q about the "Finsrud GMD analyzed" where I have IPMM version 6.0 as a second try. My first try with gravity was IPMM 5.0
If you have to continuously do work on the system to keep it moving, then it is not pertual motion. All you are doing is replacing the energy lost from the system via the work done by non conservative forces by moving the "top" magnetic wheel...
So this an experiment, a study into free energy, I never said it was a working free energy device. I'm just trying to find a way with this type of drive. Okay?
that's what I thought. If you want to imply that I am naive for believing in EMPIRICALLY VERIFIED scientific principles, you better have a better argument prepared than a wooden wheel with magnets glued to it...
No what I want is for you to listen to what mankind has known since the 15th century. That perpetual motion is NOT POSSIBLE. I want for you (and all like you)to stop convincing people of inferior intellect that this garbage is science...
You don't give Finsrud the advantage of doubt, but I do. that is the difference between the two of us. I believe him, you don't. You preach scepticism, I preach confidence in an accomplished fact - even though it is an artistically meant fact that needs scientific conjecture. What keeps me going and speaking like this is Finsrud's precendent plus other theoretical/empirical support that vacuum energy can be converted and thus lead to perpetual motion. We differ in opinion, respect that please.
that "little extra" is actually your power source. this is what spins the whole thing that has exactly the same or LESS(due to the small friction) energy that you put in. THATS RIGHT THE LITTLE EXTRA IS ALL THE ENERGY THE DEVICE HAS
We have theories, but proof of conjecture or refutatio we have not. Therefore we keep experimenting until a definite answer is found. I'm not done because we have an example of a working gravitomagnetic device. Please see my Finsrud video. watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q
I say the little bit of extra is derived form the inertia that stored the magnetic reaction. It is the magnetic reacton force relative to the inertia or gravity that delivers the energy, at least that is the hypothesis of this experiment. Energy is never created, it is converted only. We try to convert the space energy that by the magnets is polarized into kinetic energy. The enrgy is free available i space, it only needs to be converted.That is it.
Dude you are just pedaling the wheel to spin with magnets. You can do the same thing with gears. This is not Overunity or perpetual motion nor free energy.
why dont you put springs on either side of the top thingy and then it should bounce back and forth with the right tension and then put coils and capture the electricity to power a light = you will have your pure mechanical energy indeffinately after the initial start and then over unity after that in the electrical sense ... then after that I would rip those crappy magnets out and put some real ones in and your in business
I am trying all kind of things to make it work, but the engagement of electricity is later on once the magnets deliver kinetic energy. See my latest design 7 & 6 watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q where i try to engage gravity in the design. It is a long process and takes a lot of study and skil, just to understand and manage this essentially quantum mechanical proces of making magnetism do work . If it works we have a scientific revolution. Theory is not the problem. So the question is: what is yours in this?
Well my theory is that you are deffinately on to something. I have seen one method that does work already but yours is very interesting. I have my own concepts that Im working on. For those that say over unity is impossible need to totally shut their retard mouths. We have been living with over unity for many decades now its called nuclear energy duhhhhhh. Achieving overunity in the home has already been done multiple times but the researchers usually dissapear :( Thankfully Japan is on this now
why dont you make the spinning thing produce power and then use a small ammount of that power to power the thing that provides the spinning which gives more power than you originally had =free energy
the end of the gears and see my point move the big one and the small one goes fast move the small one and the big one goes slow your using the same amount of energy ether way lets say the big one is 5 times as big as the small one you have to turn the small one around 5 times to make the big one turn once and you have to turn the big one 1 time and the small one goes around five times and also the variables that go with it the big one is 5 times as heavy therefore has 5 times a much resistance
The whole point of a magnet motor is that newtoniam physics don't apply. It is quantum mechanics when we have such a working motor. That motor is based upon the so-called Arahanov-Bohm effect: a closed magnetic loop challenges the space energy quantummechanically. So all that you say does not apply when we succeed in creating that loop and stressing the field sufficiently that the space energy with the quantummecanical effect is challenged. This is the holy grail we are looking for: QM-proof.
not free energy it just another way of turning strength to speed i bet there is a lot of resistance when you move the wheel on top and you dont have to move it much and the bottom one goes fairly fast but the one on the bottom has little resistance compared to the one on the top but you have to put more effort to move it as fast as before you can get the same effect with simple gears get a big gear and a small put both on a separate moving axes use a rubber band to put em together put handles on
So to extract work & energy from the disc a setup must be made to eg. drive an axle to a machine / or rotate a coil in a mag field to make electricity. Then as the disc does work it will slow down. If you measure the amount of work (energy) coming out it will be less than the energy you will have to put IN to keep the disc up to speed. The energy that is lost is frictional losses, so it will never be 'over-unity', and the energy OUT will never be 'free energy'
A spinning disc on its own is not doing work or giving out energy. Work and energy are only given OUT when the disc 'slows down'. The disc will speed up when work & energy are put IN to it. Even a disc spinning freely in space is not a PMM, there are always very small friction & other resistive effects sucking very small amounts of energy back out of it.
The fact that you have made the disc to spin means that you have put energy into it. The speed of the wheel is a measure of that energy content. Friction increases with speed so the faster it goes the more friction it has to overcome. Once it is up to a constant speed, your impulses that you are adding is only going to overcome that friction. If you take the disc into empty space, away from air friction, your disc would continue to spin a lot longer, without adding impulses at all.
Arguments of classical physics do not really apply when we are dealing with a overunity situation. But okay, overunity is not proven with this set-up, so this truth is with you as for now. Someday though someone will present a working magnet motor, then you may start all over reasoning and I will be done. Thanks for the feedback
We say 'free energy' in the sense of being free from another input than by nature. Oxymoron means a combination of contradictory terms. Indeed the energy is bound to a play of forces. Tuned to the restlessness of nature it is not an oxymoron. Tuned to personal input by hand or combustion it indeed is. Thus we try to overcome this oxymoron indeed in our endeavor to realize overunity or a self-runner with this ipmm drive.
I have been thinking about this for a while now, ever since I heard about the Newton engine, the is Joseph not Isaac. I will be making on of these for my own experimentation, thank you very much for sharing this with us.
place a sensor on the disk (for timing),run an arm from the sensor to to his controller and spring load the controller connected to the lower wheel (timing wheel). if i make it it wont b televised! sorry tubers
This idiot is actually smart. He is payed from governmet, to put a bad light on the free energy. IT IS OBVIOUS. You need to understand simbols. His work is a trial to make other scientists fools.
Are you with " This Idiot" referring to yourself? Are YOU CIA disinformation accusing others of it? Also very smart to create division this way... Conscious projection, we call it. And If you suffer from the conspiracy theory disease, then please check out with your psychiatrist for paranoia, this is the psychologist namely. The best remedy is to experiment yourself. Always be positive with people trying like me, even if it runs into refutations. That happens to be thw way of science....
Please study previous chats about this and my other videos carefully. I prove my sincere effors to get my hand out of the equation, It is the same problem as with the Hamel spinner. Overunity is proven if it is a serlfrunner. Starting up with one's hand is accepted. Don't judge too rashly. This is no easy matter, even though the principle seeems to be easy. And the word 'idiot' is inappropriate, not your honor of respect i think.
This was titled free energy, so I dont even need to watch the video. NO machines independent on their own power can create more energy than they consume.
What would happen if you secured a single wood spoke on the outside circumference of the spinning disk?
Then have it make contact with ONE of the flat wood popsicle sticks you are pumping by hand. BOTTOM stick contact.
The TOP of this popsicle stick spindle can be connected to a springback return spring to auto reset the lower portion of the spring to always center itself for the next rotor spoke hit.
Think about this, if we make the machine such that a small movement is needed to keep the motion; it is so small that ambient vibration can take over the job for us. Overunity.
Nice experiment, I think the whole idea with magnets can be improved in fact so far that only one first touch is needed to bring the whole process to a self-drive. Then, we can talk about free energy (whereas it is not free in the way that it comes from nothing, it is just converted from one energy source to another one)
the idea is a lot good but i think that the trigger device you are pushing and pulling to slip the magnetic field to let the wheel rotate absorbs as much energy as the flywheel makes
you are pushing magnets using magnets but a flywheel supported by a HDD ball bearing really doesnt need a lot of energy to turn and you can surely feel the force applied with your fingers to flip the trigger
Yes I'm working on this kind of improvements, also with better flywheels with HDD bearings, keep an eye on my page. At present I am testing a design with three hardrive plates. But there is nothing definitely different to show as yet. Its gettng more and more efficient until I break that barrier where we catch the Reaction Force from the vacuum. There is already an update and a feedbackdesign called the IPMM_MAN device for the proof of magnetic OU. Check also my page at the overunity forum.
I agree with small movements of the stater move the bigger mass with little effort. A bike I believe could be biult that the stater is hooked to a brack handle when squose a little the magnets on the sprocket would react like a motor.The man that biult the coral castle used this tech.Somebody with the shop and matierial should crank one out and Put the thing on you tube and change the the world.Just do it someone!Danka shane wonderful!
There is also a further development to follow under IPMM MAN device for the proof of magnetic overunity: a feedbackloop has been achieved with the cakra. No selfrunner yet though. It is not that easy this holy grail.
The answer is simple... There is no Over-Unity... it is powered by his hand. take that away and the device stops... simple right. And don't offer anecdotal proof like "this guy's got a patent and this guy made it work, but I can't duplicate it on video for some reason" Duh!
Overunity is not proven so much by a self runner as by experiments proving a reactive power exceeding your input that is inherent in the dynamics of the physical universe. With magnets you see such a power. I demonstrate a so-called SMOT overunity from that reactive power, but harnessing it in a self-runner with torque requires engineering and materials know-how to catch the vibrations. So that is to the engineer. I am just a researcher finding clarity about this. SMOT OU was proven by Sprain.
Anecdotal evidence is no evidence at all. Site a paper, reviewed by the scientific community. "I've got a rock that keeps lions away... had it since I was five years old and have never been attacked yet" Test it by going to Africa and you'll be proved wrong.
There is no proof of over-unity. Only claims of proof. Anything that ever claimed to violate conservation of energy, has either been thoroughly disproven... or has never been properly tested by independent review.
All of your explanations about where the energy comes from is VERY theoretical and makes for good bafflegab to convince people who don't know advanced physics. This stuff about gravitons, zero-point, ether energy, is all theorized by quantum mechanics over the last 60 years. No one has proven anything yet, let alone tapped into it.
That is not true, and you know it. There is ample proof of overunity energy in all kinds of experimental setups of many inventors. What you talk about is the paradigmatic conflict. You take sides therein. Others simply accept the conflict and wait until the new technology breaks through. Then people like you will be silent. But that can take 20 to 30 years more of research and development. That is how it goes with science. That is the normal routine, not?
For the record, John Hutchinson created what he believe to be a zero point batter, which is just a canister full of rocks, he's been using it for years and it hasn't run down yet. Although it might not be zero point, it is real, and it does produce energy without needing to be refilled. Theoretically, as long as the rocks in the canister exists in this plane, they will produce energy. Sounds like zero point, doesn't it?
Anecdotal evidence is no evidence at all. Site a paper, reviewed by the scientific community. "I've got a rock that keeps lions away... had it since I was five years old and have never been attacked yet" Test it by going to Africa and you'll be proved wrong.
There is no proof of over-unity. Only claims of proof. Anything that ever claimed to violate conservation of energy, has either been thoroughly disproven... or has never been properly tested by independent review.
I hope you are right, that would be the easiest form of mechanical feeback, another problem though is the jerking of the feedback in the stator arm, that is the mechanical back-EMF. The art of the thing is to utilize that properly engaging it in a vibration the spinning cakra can respond to. The snake has to bite its own tail... Probably that will be effective at a certain rpm dependingthe construction.
If you gear it up with different flywheels it can develop considerable torque with a slight input. That is the theory, for you the practice to prove, show me!
You can leave a gap in the middle.The silver bycyle ring is just for discipline. I made a chakra wit eight arms with a dollar-size gap in the middle to move the neo in. Works also.
ok i'll go buy the magnets i checked at the hardware store, $1.19 Canadian per magnet. i'm gonna check at a craft store. i also can't find the neo though
ok, but i need to know what you made some parts of it out of (a material list) eg. 66 snapper magnets, a neodemium magnet, a silver bicycle ring, an old hard drive, duct tape, a wind chime. what am i missing?
That's it, you just summed it up, apart from the double sided sticky tape to fix them on the plate made of insulation board (compressed styrofoam), and an old tape spindle to fix the plate to the hardrive...
sorry, i always fragment my comments. what if you had two bars hanging but attached solidly to the axle of the mechanism, then have a sort of "cam", a little bump or appendage on top of one of the moons of the chakra, so at one half rotation, it bumps the first bar and creates the slight motion one way, carrying the chakra through to the next half-rotation, where the cam bumps the other bar and creates the other opposite slight motion needed to sustain the machine and create over-unity.
I admit it is inspiring, but I am not such a mechanic, I did this project as part of the research i did for writing an article/book. So please show me what you can, don't ask what I can, i do what I can, Pease do the same. I will make a google presentation of my free energy research soon.
Very interesting. This technology could be used on a bicycle. Even if the motor is not 100% efficient, since the bicycle wheel will be turning anyway, the faster the bicyclist peddles the more energy he could get from the motor. The motor would give a slight "kick" each time the bicyclist peddles.
hydroponic magnetic water treatment gos something like this ,stir water 20 1 way then reverse once repeat ,well its meant to stimulate plant growth ,worth a thought
The cakra spins backwards very easily indeed. There is a guy with a rubber band system: first cycles forward, then backward. Could a be useful someday, someway. Keep me posted.
The idea is to draw energy from the space around it. Will this wheel do the trick? That is the research question. It certainly takes good engineering better than I show here.
good on ya i know 3 parts of fuck all but all you people trying and steorn look at the stuff he is using that cost dollars if it can be done at least these people are taking all the no s away maybe 1 day there is a yes
I'm deeply impressed with the level of motivation and dedication that all you guys are putting into these ideas - incidently, you missed out Stan Meyer and Griggs from your overunity patent list. However, I have yet to see any truly convincing evidence of overunity. The strive to produce even more efficient machines should not be overlooked even getting close to 100% is a worthwhile cause, and of course it's great fun too - Keep it up chaps.
Check the website of Naudin. He did several replications and proved overunity. E,g, the MEG of Bearden proved right to be overunity. Bedini has a machine running on its own self charged battery for 15 years. Recently Prain patented an overunity device 6.2 volts out 3 volts in. There is ample proof and Griggs and Meyer we also know as sucesses.
Bedini, Bearden and Finsrud all delivered convincing proof. Bedini is widely replicated. Bearden is proven by Naudin and Finsrud is still running after all these years, but difficult to replicate. Consider what we try here a simplification of Finsrud's.
One of a zillion hand-powered devices which are not overunity. Everyone so far has failed to build the feedback circuit necessary for a self-runner with these magnet motors.
That doesn't mean we should stop trying. What I offer here is an improvement on the efficiency of driving a wheel. With this wheel one pulse per cycle suffices. And the faster the thing goes, the less energy for the pulse is needed. Others need more.
I am hoping that this device is something more special than a pendulum in a clock. Please reply anandaadhar if you don't quite understand what I mean.
That is what we are researching: is this magnetic interaction more that another mechanical transmission of the impuls? The OC MPMM design of the Steorn forum members (see my favorites) proves that such a thing can run and even speed up for at least three hours. The replication ise troublesome, but several have achieved this overunity effect already.
very nice, videos. Vrey informative. I eould ask that you explain magnetic overunity in more simple terms, also the 3 proofs i.e 1. electric, 2. electro mechanical etc.. can you explain these a little more?
Magnetic overunity is the work done by a magnet. Simply sticking up a weight e.g. The three proofs are all there, but the mechanical aspect was as yet difficult to reproduce. So that is what weare afetr: easily replicable proof of the containment of magnetic overunity.
The fly wheel is the basic concept for all engines you idiot! also, It takes dreamers to change the way we live and think outwith the box we all live in....it was dreamers who now allow us to fly in aeroplanes, cars, trains, build roads, bridges, etc.....it was fools like you in those days who said...."only birds can fly, humans never will!"
Sorry I meant to say. "The fly wheel is the basic testing portal fot all experimental engines"....didn't you learn that in school? unless you have a huge budget to spend on a hobby....I like this guy would use what works around me. Your getting a free valuable lesson here in 5 videos. Appreciate that you retard!
the conservation of energy' states that the total amount of energy in any isolated system remains constant but can't be recreated, although it may change forms!
Right you are with a closed system. The question is whether we have an open system able to catch the energy from the gravitons (ethermagnetic particles of space) polarized by the manets. We need the original Maxwell calculating for open systems.
I expect that starting it up requires the extra energy, but that sustaining the energy, the wheel takes it over since a faster spin requires less effort to maintain. The basic question remaining is: can we lead back the supposed overuity of the magnets back into the pulse-mechanism?
I had the same idea, use a cam and springs. Just make sure u get the right timing, and don't lose too much of the kinetic energy to the friction in such an add on mechanism.
Indeed that keeps you going. Are you really trying something as you suggest here? I'd like to see that! It is just a matter of controlling the living energy of the universe you know. We never create it, we just are to harness it. Please watch my latest video about the IPMM MAN device and the discussions at the overunity forum if you care.
where is the free energy this is human hand energy :)
lossofframe 5 months ago
@lossofframe Yeah man, how to make your hand the hand of God, that is the question....
anandaadhar 5 months ago
@anandaadhar move name "Free Energy Magnet Motor Pt-5" where is the free energy ...???
lossofframe 4 months ago
@lossofframe I am still engaged in the free energy research with this rotor disc. It is inconlusive as yet. No yes no no. I still believe a magnet motor like this might work engaging gravity and inertial oscillation as well in the circuit as Finsrud's PM suggests. Therefore read the title as 'free energy research magnet motor', it is evidently not a finished product or experiment.
anandaadhar 4 months ago
the "little bit of extra energ" that drives the "motor" comes from inertia.... If you can get it going fast enough to produce a strong electrical current... you might have something....F=ma is a simple idea...If the current being created can generate a higher output force than the input force used to get it going, you might have something....your going to need a good kick start lol
78526brian 1 year ago
I was doing experiments like this 20 years ago. You eventually figure out people these things require an energy source to make whatever is in line 1st SPIN. the guy here admits it from day1 of video. You cannot have a perpetual motion machine. They dont exist
shiznitbitslap 1 year ago
@shiznitbitslap No not on magnetism alone, nor on gravity alone, but combined with inertial oscillation maybe. that is my actual stand. There is a precedent for this. The point is that Finsrud claims and demonstrates he has made one. See my other vids.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
have you tried a linkage from the bottom wheel to the top, so it moves itself and keeps going?..
100roberthenry 1 year ago
@100roberthenry yes, at present I am trying with a linkage with an axle directed upwards that gives feedback to a pendulum that moves the stator in combination with an inertial oscillator. There are many hurdles to take if this would be possible at all, and I haven't taken them all as yet.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar . indeed many hurdles...and it would take quite precise engineering too....thanks rob.
100roberthenry 1 year ago
store the energy from the big rotor and use a part off it to move the top rotor
Proxy2013 1 year ago
@Proxy2013 Yes I am doing that, but gravity needs to play a part, as well as inertial oscillation. No success as yet. As for now Finsrud could not be confirmed by my experiments.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar might it be able to use other forms of energy to use energy from the large rotor to power the top rotor? example... if u could generate electricity from the large rotor to turn a small engine that powers the top rotor. i dont know if it could generate enough electricity though. or if u could find a material that reacts to light, and have the top rotor made out of it, while having the large rotor powering a light that shines on the top rotor and makes it spin, just random thoughts...
blackgaymidgetjew 11 months ago
@blackgaymidgetjew First of all you need movement to have electricity to control the forces, but certain is that just magnetism will not be the original source of that movement leading to an electric current. Gravity alone will neither lead to such a result. What remains is the testing of the hypothesis that natural time delivers us a universe of gravitational fields and magnetic fields that apparently is in a state of perpetual motion. Tesla told us to hook up our machines to this wheel work.
anandaadhar 11 months ago
My research proves that almost all overunity devices draw their extra energy from the potential energy of the local gravitational field. And to describe them in full scientific detail, it is required to revise the Maxwells equations of Electromagnetism to no-linear equations, and Einstein's theory of gravitation. So for the academic world to account for them it is required 1-3 nobels...
DrKCostas 1 year ago
@DrKCostas yes i agree, gravity is the original overunity of it all. I keep trying until gravity works for me with this rotor.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
Congratulations!
DrKCostas 1 year ago
Until somebody finds a way to press the static force of magnetism into a dynamic search for its equilibrium revealing a new law: the conservation of movement law (for all of the universe is in consant flux)
anandaadhar 1 year ago
Isn't free energy. You have to control that one thing to keep it in motion. That takes energy since you have to move it. Our motions are not without energy! Even if you did setup a coil with that or something voltage would be minimal.
WWoodyW 2 years ago
The idea is that the magnetic reactionforce can be stored and distributed in a feedback loop. The drive for the stator pulse takes very little energy. If that energy is less than the energy we get from the magnetic reactionforce we're done. This is a theory. But as yet it has not been confirmed by this experiment. The theory can be wrong, the implementation can be wrong. I takes a lot of trials to prove an exception to the law of conservation. How to pick this magnetic lock?
anandaadhar 2 years ago
@WWoodyW
You know to create your gas, Nuclear, and any other type of fuel requires energy to gather and produce it. The point isn't to create perpetual motion devices but alternative means of energy without the cost of Fuel... Free in other words. If you simply build a power plant out of a system like that you could use a minimal amount of energy into starting it out and then never again needed as long as the system is running. And if more of these are built they can start other new systems.
Peacekeeper2403 1 year ago
@WWoodyW
It's kind of like a Jet Engine. Most of them can't start themselves on, they require another smaller engine that can start on its own to produce the motion for the main shaft of the Jet Engine before it can start compressing the air in the shaft to ignite the mixture and produce the rotation on its own. Whether the airplane is on Ground power or using the APU it still needs that external power to simply start it's own power plants. This could be the same when on no need for external.
Peacekeeper2403 1 year ago
As I said I believe the energy produced would be minimal. Nuclear power is still the way to go. Not wind, solar, or this.
WWoodyW 1 year ago
google proof of overunity there are a few math papers on it , its been 'prooven' for some time now , spend less time flamin more time learnin ? thats all the maker of the vid is doing and the people watching , not the flamers though they have learned all there is to know and made them into laws , taking the mystery outa liffe must be why there so bitter when something new comes along . the same people would have been supriesd when electricity was invented.
STiELzephyr 2 years ago 2
energy in = energy out
lmusho 2 years ago
Sad thing is that all you have is a fancy crank.
lennyhome 2 years ago
Maybe indeed the crank principle isn't the right one for a magnetic motor. We are used to thinking in terms of the combustion engine. But this crank system of alternating for a smooth run is not the drive of the machine. The explosion of gas in the combustion engine is. So what does this for the magnetic motor? Where does the kick come from that we would have to crank up? At present I study Howard Johnson to figure this out. watch?v=mAhe1nX0HLM
anandaadhar 2 years ago
The strength of the magnetic field on the axis of rotation of your wheel (the vertical axis in the video) is not uniform and you give energy to the wheel by wobbling around another magnet with your hands. There's nothing strange about it. It's just a a magnetic crank.
lennyhome 2 years ago
So it seems, but other experiments by Johnson and Hamel suggest that that magnetic crank can be pulsed by a certain spacing of the magnets in such a fashion that the collapsing fields in the spaces elicit a kick of space energy that can be harnessed for a motor. That is the effect we are looking for. We look into the parameters defining such an action. We look for a law of nature that as yet has escaped our scientific scrutiny. This disc is just one of the many possible magnetic setups for this.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Unfortunately the wheel is still moved by his hand. If the machine worked we would not be seeing this unfinished design, he would be rich. The only way to make a magnetic motor which uses no fuel is to find a substance which could screen the fields to stop magnetic attraction/repulsion.
bikemech121 2 years ago 2
There are more ways than the concept of shielding. Off center rotor action to name one. (google for E.B.M. Szabo)
anandaadhar 2 years ago
But surely pulling the field apart requires exactly the same force gained from attraction, off centre rotors do the same. If one was to find a way of making this work the machine would run to destruction if under no load.
bikemech121 2 years ago
Yes, nothing will really happen unless another force is involved to pulsate the magnet rotor. This, intelligently done - and that is the whole point - can be gravity, inertia, or a combination of both that together with the magetism create a vibratin that sustains in converting the space of time energy of nature into kinetic energy. The research question here is whether we can break the equivalence principle this way and thus achieve overuniy. As yet it is just theory and failing experiments.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
So you are trying to tap the forces of space-time energy to work the gate? Clever stuff indeed, I must keep watch on your progress and I wish you success.
bikemech121 2 years ago
First, I didn't watch all of your videos, so please correct me if you addressed this. The "overunity" machines that I've seen built (including yours) all take advantage of, to some extent, the energy contained in the ordering of the domains of the magnets (the reason they're magnets), which is not unlimited (ALL magnets lose their magnetism). I encourage you to create a machine that harnesses earth's gravity and (small) magnetic field as energy, there is where the hope is.
weezilla 2 years ago
Right you are, i agree, and that is what I am trying at the moment. My latest video prepares for this option: watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q about the "Finsrud GMD analyzed" where I have IPMM version 6.0 as a second try. My first try with gravity was IPMM 5.0
anandaadhar 2 years ago
If you have to continuously do work on the system to keep it moving, then it is not pertual motion. All you are doing is replacing the energy lost from the system via the work done by non conservative forces by moving the "top" magnetic wheel...
thefullmonte03 2 years ago
So this an experiment, a study into free energy, I never said it was a working free energy device. I'm just trying to find a way with this type of drive. Okay?
anandaadhar 2 years ago
that's what I thought. If you want to imply that I am naive for believing in EMPIRICALLY VERIFIED scientific principles, you better have a better argument prepared than a wooden wheel with magnets glued to it...
thefullmonte03 2 years ago
You want to get the better of me I think.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
No what I want is for you to listen to what mankind has known since the 15th century. That perpetual motion is NOT POSSIBLE. I want for you (and all like you)to stop convincing people of inferior intellect that this garbage is science...
thefullmonte03 2 years ago
You don't give Finsrud the advantage of doubt, but I do. that is the difference between the two of us. I believe him, you don't. You preach scepticism, I preach confidence in an accomplished fact - even though it is an artistically meant fact that needs scientific conjecture. What keeps me going and speaking like this is Finsrud's precendent plus other theoretical/empirical support that vacuum energy can be converted and thus lead to perpetual motion. We differ in opinion, respect that please.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
that "little extra" is actually your power source. this is what spins the whole thing that has exactly the same or LESS(due to the small friction) energy that you put in. THATS RIGHT THE LITTLE EXTRA IS ALL THE ENERGY THE DEVICE HAS
xaris106 2 years ago
We have theories, but proof of conjecture or refutatio we have not. Therefore we keep experimenting until a definite answer is found. I'm not done because we have an example of a working gravitomagnetic device. Please see my Finsrud video. watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q
anandaadhar 2 years ago
it slows down FAST=> no free energy
blagkonijn 2 years ago
it can generate exactly the same energy with the little extra energy that you need.
0+1=1
1-1=0
so do not try create energy by contraries
Gr0nTh0s 2 years ago
I say the little bit of extra is derived form the inertia that stored the magnetic reaction. It is the magnetic reacton force relative to the inertia or gravity that delivers the energy, at least that is the hypothesis of this experiment. Energy is never created, it is converted only. We try to convert the space energy that by the magnets is polarized into kinetic energy. The enrgy is free available i space, it only needs to be converted.That is it.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
good luck my friend!!!
Gr0nTh0s 2 years ago
Ты что куриш??? Выдыхай мужик
ytizen 2 years ago
English please...
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Dude you are just pedaling the wheel to spin with magnets. You can do the same thing with gears. This is not Overunity or perpetual motion nor free energy.
timrocket2008 3 years ago
Yes, it is an experiment about it, please study my later video's.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
try an spring mecanism to acumulate part of the reaction and then deliver it back as a feedback syncronize whit the rotor( like a clock)
imaginacion2009 3 years ago
Yes, that spring mechanism turned out to be the gravity ruled pulsing of a pendulum. Please study my later vids.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
why dont you put springs on either side of the top thingy and then it should bounce back and forth with the right tension and then put coils and capture the electricity to power a light = you will have your pure mechanical energy indeffinately after the initial start and then over unity after that in the electrical sense ... then after that I would rip those crappy magnets out and put some real ones in and your in business
scrappykoala 3 years ago
I am trying all kind of things to make it work, but the engagement of electricity is later on once the magnets deliver kinetic energy. See my latest design 7 & 6 watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q where i try to engage gravity in the design. It is a long process and takes a lot of study and skil, just to understand and manage this essentially quantum mechanical proces of making magnetism do work . If it works we have a scientific revolution. Theory is not the problem. So the question is: what is yours in this?
anandaadhar 3 years ago
Well my theory is that you are deffinately on to something. I have seen one method that does work already but yours is very interesting. I have my own concepts that Im working on. For those that say over unity is impossible need to totally shut their retard mouths. We have been living with over unity for many decades now its called nuclear energy duhhhhhh. Achieving overunity in the home has already been done multiple times but the researchers usually dissapear :( Thankfully Japan is on this now
scrappykoala 3 years ago
This one is here to stay
anandaadhar 3 years ago
why dont you make the spinning thing produce power and then use a small ammount of that power to power the thing that provides the spinning which gives more power than you originally had =free energy
ehhblinkin 3 years ago
The point is that we want to deliver a purely mechanical proof. Bedini and Bearden delivered the electromagnetic and solid state proof.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
bla,bla,bla, no funciona.
schonherbent 3 years ago
It is indeed a bit more difficult. But there are examples of others. Please see watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q
anandaadhar 3 years ago
His 5 Videos are the epitaph of what`s floating all over the Internet currently. Well done!!!
AClarke2007 3 years ago
lots of talking what it could do, lots of talking about overunity and a lot of manual action.
where is the working model with feed back (self containing motion)?
gmankl 3 years ago
the end of the gears and see my point move the big one and the small one goes fast move the small one and the big one goes slow your using the same amount of energy ether way lets say the big one is 5 times as big as the small one you have to turn the small one around 5 times to make the big one turn once and you have to turn the big one 1 time and the small one goes around five times and also the variables that go with it the big one is 5 times as heavy therefore has 5 times a much resistance
hamanatar 3 years ago
The whole point of a magnet motor is that newtoniam physics don't apply. It is quantum mechanics when we have such a working motor. That motor is based upon the so-called Arahanov-Bohm effect: a closed magnetic loop challenges the space energy quantummechanically. So all that you say does not apply when we succeed in creating that loop and stressing the field sufficiently that the space energy with the quantummecanical effect is challenged. This is the holy grail we are looking for: QM-proof.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
Sorry, a misspelling, the name is Aharonov-bohm, see the wikipedia pages for that.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
not free energy it just another way of turning strength to speed i bet there is a lot of resistance when you move the wheel on top and you dont have to move it much and the bottom one goes fairly fast but the one on the bottom has little resistance compared to the one on the top but you have to put more effort to move it as fast as before you can get the same effect with simple gears get a big gear and a small put both on a separate moving axes use a rubber band to put em together put handles on
hamanatar 3 years ago
5 * awesome
HeManCRO 3 years ago
TOTELY WAiST OF TIME, TOTELY WAiST OF TIME,
utubbasterd 3 years ago
I am determined to waste standard time energy managment in favor of true time natural energy management. It that sense you are right.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
So to extract work & energy from the disc a setup must be made to eg. drive an axle to a machine / or rotate a coil in a mag field to make electricity. Then as the disc does work it will slow down. If you measure the amount of work (energy) coming out it will be less than the energy you will have to put IN to keep the disc up to speed. The energy that is lost is frictional losses, so it will never be 'over-unity', and the energy OUT will never be 'free energy'
BRAIDERMAN 3 years ago
A spinning disc on its own is not doing work or giving out energy. Work and energy are only given OUT when the disc 'slows down'. The disc will speed up when work & energy are put IN to it. Even a disc spinning freely in space is not a PMM, there are always very small friction & other resistive effects sucking very small amounts of energy back out of it.
BRAIDERMAN 3 years ago
The fact that you have made the disc to spin means that you have put energy into it. The speed of the wheel is a measure of that energy content. Friction increases with speed so the faster it goes the more friction it has to overcome. Once it is up to a constant speed, your impulses that you are adding is only going to overcome that friction. If you take the disc into empty space, away from air friction, your disc would continue to spin a lot longer, without adding impulses at all.
BRAIDERMAN 3 years ago
Arguments of classical physics do not really apply when we are dealing with a overunity situation. But okay, overunity is not proven with this set-up, so this truth is with you as for now. Someday though someone will present a working magnet motor, then you may start all over reasoning and I will be done. Thanks for the feedback
anandaadhar 3 years ago
9 minut i 59 sekund na jedno i to samo.
w 30 sekund by się gostek wypowiedział i pokazał o co chodzi.
Poznaniaczek 3 years ago
translation please
anandaadhar 3 years ago
:-) this man need a doctor.
everland1983 3 years ago
Here is the doctor, what can I do you? Does it hurt somewhere?
anandaadhar 3 years ago
"Free" energy is an oxymoron
ematt454 3 years ago
We say 'free energy' in the sense of being free from another input than by nature. Oxymoron means a combination of contradictory terms. Indeed the energy is bound to a play of forces. Tuned to the restlessness of nature it is not an oxymoron. Tuned to personal input by hand or combustion it indeed is. Thus we try to overcome this oxymoron indeed in our endeavor to realize overunity or a self-runner with this ipmm drive.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
I have been thinking about this for a while now, ever since I heard about the Newton engine, the is Joseph not Isaac. I will be making on of these for my own experimentation, thank you very much for sharing this with us.
BrutusCass 3 years ago
place a sensor on the disk (for timing),run an arm from the sensor to to his controller and spring load the controller connected to the lower wheel (timing wheel). if i make it it wont b televised! sorry tubers
universalmoor 3 years ago
Okay let me see, words is just words
anandaadhar 3 years ago
This idiot is actually smart. He is payed from governmet, to put a bad light on the free energy. IT IS OBVIOUS. You need to understand simbols. His work is a trial to make other scientists fools.
DAMCI1 3 years ago
Are you with " This Idiot" referring to yourself? Are YOU CIA disinformation accusing others of it? Also very smart to create division this way... Conscious projection, we call it. And If you suffer from the conspiracy theory disease, then please check out with your psychiatrist for paranoia, this is the psychologist namely. The best remedy is to experiment yourself. Always be positive with people trying like me, even if it runs into refutations. That happens to be thw way of science....
anandaadhar 3 years ago
He's touching the machine a lot, am I the only one or is this guy an idiot thinking this is free energy?
frankpwz 3 years ago
Please study previous chats about this and my other videos carefully. I prove my sincere effors to get my hand out of the equation, It is the same problem as with the Hamel spinner. Overunity is proven if it is a serlfrunner. Starting up with one's hand is accepted. Don't judge too rashly. This is no easy matter, even though the principle seeems to be easy. And the word 'idiot' is inappropriate, not your honor of respect i think.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
(cont), and what part of free energy do you think it's OK to add energy with your hands???
frankpwz 3 years ago
This was titled free energy, so I dont even need to watch the video. NO machines independent on their own power can create more energy than they consume.
frankpwz 3 years ago
your adding MASSIVE ammounts of energy from your hand
cars2024 3 years ago
Not anymore now, see the later vids.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
What would happen if you secured a single wood spoke on the outside circumference of the spinning disk?
Then have it make contact with ONE of the flat wood popsicle sticks you are pumping by hand. BOTTOM stick contact.
The TOP of this popsicle stick spindle can be connected to a springback return spring to auto reset the lower portion of the spring to always center itself for the next rotor spoke hit.
Presto. Instant overunity . No human contact.
64298 3 years ago
Think about this, if we make the machine such that a small movement is needed to keep the motion; it is so small that ambient vibration can take over the job for us. Overunity.
vietarc 3 years ago
Please see the latest update for the IPMM MAN device at my ananaadhar pages.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
You need to macro the movement that you are performing by your hand.
zecnobot 3 years ago
Nice experiment, I think the whole idea with magnets can be improved in fact so far that only one first touch is needed to bring the whole process to a self-drive. Then, we can talk about free energy (whereas it is not free in the way that it comes from nothing, it is just converted from one energy source to another one)
truth4usAll 3 years ago
I agree
anandaadhar 3 years ago
mhhhhhh
the idea is a lot good but i think that the trigger device you are pushing and pulling to slip the magnetic field to let the wheel rotate absorbs as much energy as the flywheel makes
you are pushing magnets using magnets but a flywheel supported by a HDD ball bearing really doesnt need a lot of energy to turn and you can surely feel the force applied with your fingers to flip the trigger
Terminchiator 3 years ago
Yes I'm working on this kind of improvements, also with better flywheels with HDD bearings, keep an eye on my page. At present I am testing a design with three hardrive plates. But there is nothing definitely different to show as yet. Its gettng more and more efficient until I break that barrier where we catch the Reaction Force from the vacuum. There is already an update and a feedbackdesign called the IPMM_MAN device for the proof of magnetic OU. Check also my page at the overunity forum.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
I agree with small movements of the stater move the bigger mass with little effort. A bike I believe could be biult that the stater is hooked to a brack handle when squose a little the magnets on the sprocket would react like a motor.The man that biult the coral castle used this tech.Somebody with the shop and matierial should crank one out and Put the thing on you tube and change the the world.Just do it someone!Danka shane wonderful!
uncleshorty 3 years ago
Check also the most recent post of the Magnet Motor drive Update (under my name)!
anandaadhar 3 years ago
There is also a further development to follow under IPMM MAN device for the proof of magnetic overunity: a feedbackloop has been achieved with the cakra. No selfrunner yet though. It is not that easy this holy grail.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
The answer is simple... There is no Over-Unity... it is powered by his hand. take that away and the device stops... simple right. And don't offer anecdotal proof like "this guy's got a patent and this guy made it work, but I can't duplicate it on video for some reason" Duh!
Joeviocoe 3 years ago
Overunity is not proven so much by a self runner as by experiments proving a reactive power exceeding your input that is inherent in the dynamics of the physical universe. With magnets you see such a power. I demonstrate a so-called SMOT overunity from that reactive power, but harnessing it in a self-runner with torque requires engineering and materials know-how to catch the vibrations. So that is to the engineer. I am just a researcher finding clarity about this. SMOT OU was proven by Sprain.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
Anecdotal evidence is no evidence at all. Site a paper, reviewed by the scientific community. "I've got a rock that keeps lions away... had it since I was five years old and have never been attacked yet" Test it by going to Africa and you'll be proved wrong.
There is no proof of over-unity. Only claims of proof. Anything that ever claimed to violate conservation of energy, has either been thoroughly disproven... or has never been properly tested by independent review.
Joeviocoe 3 years ago
Please check my new free Energy Lectures where I answer to much of your qualms. (more will follow)
anandaadhar 3 years ago
All of your explanations about where the energy comes from is VERY theoretical and makes for good bafflegab to convince people who don't know advanced physics. This stuff about gravitons, zero-point, ether energy, is all theorized by quantum mechanics over the last 60 years. No one has proven anything yet, let alone tapped into it.
Joeviocoe 3 years ago
That is not true, and you know it. There is ample proof of overunity energy in all kinds of experimental setups of many inventors. What you talk about is the paradigmatic conflict. You take sides therein. Others simply accept the conflict and wait until the new technology breaks through. Then people like you will be silent. But that can take 20 to 30 years more of research and development. That is how it goes with science. That is the normal routine, not?
anandaadhar 3 years ago
For the record, John Hutchinson created what he believe to be a zero point batter, which is just a canister full of rocks, he's been using it for years and it hasn't run down yet. Although it might not be zero point, it is real, and it does produce energy without needing to be refilled. Theoretically, as long as the rocks in the canister exists in this plane, they will produce energy. Sounds like zero point, doesn't it?
xombiedeth 3 years ago
Anecdotal evidence is no evidence at all. Site a paper, reviewed by the scientific community. "I've got a rock that keeps lions away... had it since I was five years old and have never been attacked yet" Test it by going to Africa and you'll be proved wrong.
There is no proof of over-unity. Only claims of proof. Anything that ever claimed to violate conservation of energy, has either been thoroughly disproven... or has never been properly tested by independent review.
Joeviocoe 3 years ago
all you need to do to make it self run is put a slight bump on the arm once counter-clockwise from the orange arm
CplWalker176 3 years ago
I hope you are right, that would be the easiest form of mechanical feeback, another problem though is the jerking of the feedback in the stator arm, that is the mechanical back-EMF. The art of the thing is to utilize that properly engaging it in a vibration the spinning cakra can respond to. The snake has to bite its own tail... Probably that will be effective at a certain rpm dependingthe construction.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
but id like to see how much friction it can stand up to when you try and get electricity out of that thing before it becomes useless
longjohncider 3 years ago
If you gear it up with different flywheels it can develop considerable torque with a slight input. That is the theory, for you the practice to prove, show me!
anandaadhar 3 years ago
what is the center of the chakra made out of? first 2 videos it's orange, then it's blue
CplWalker176 3 years ago
You can leave a gap in the middle.The silver bycyle ring is just for discipline. I made a chakra wit eight arms with a dollar-size gap in the middle to move the neo in. Works also.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
ok i'll go buy the magnets i checked at the hardware store, $1.19 Canadian per magnet. i'm gonna check at a craft store. i also can't find the neo though
CplWalker176 3 years ago
make sure the middle nob is non-magnetic, or it will hinder the stator field
anandaadhar 3 years ago
here is my video response, my progress so far...
CplWalker176 3 years ago
Looks okay, the size of the moons might overreach the rim though, first making the disc and later on the cakra-moons.
Also card board might be too weak, I tried that also and had to replace it with firmer but light board material. Keep me posted.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
right, but i need to know what the object in the center of the chakra is
CplWalker176 3 years ago
besides the bicycle ring there is the blue thing
CplWalker176 3 years ago
The blue or orange in the center is just color tape, just for reminding top and down of moons front and back. The neo's I ordered via the internet.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
i like yours it looks very colorful that makes it appealing to watch
CplWalker176 3 years ago
ok, but i need to know what you made some parts of it out of (a material list) eg. 66 snapper magnets, a neodemium magnet, a silver bicycle ring, an old hard drive, duct tape, a wind chime. what am i missing?
CplWalker176 3 years ago
That's it, you just summed it up, apart from the double sided sticky tape to fix them on the plate made of insulation board (compressed styrofoam), and an old tape spindle to fix the plate to the hardrive...
anandaadhar 3 years ago
got it. here im gonna post my progress as a reply... got the bearing finished.
dumbasspimpster 3 years ago
sorry, i always fragment my comments. what if you had two bars hanging but attached solidly to the axle of the mechanism, then have a sort of "cam", a little bump or appendage on top of one of the moons of the chakra, so at one half rotation, it bumps the first bar and creates the slight motion one way, carrying the chakra through to the next half-rotation, where the cam bumps the other bar and creates the other opposite slight motion needed to sustain the machine and create over-unity.
CplWalker176 3 years ago
I admit it is inspiring, but I am not such a mechanic, I did this project as part of the research i did for writing an article/book. So please show me what you can, don't ask what I can, i do what I can, Pease do the same. I will make a google presentation of my free energy research soon.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
that would give you the over-unity, which could be harnessed as electricity, no?
CplWalker176 3 years ago
couldn't that extra energy be produced by a servo electrically connected to a generator mounted on the chakra?
CplWalker176 3 years ago
Very interesting. This technology could be used on a bicycle. Even if the motor is not 100% efficient, since the bicycle wheel will be turning anyway, the faster the bicyclist peddles the more energy he could get from the motor. The motor would give a slight "kick" each time the bicyclist peddles.
jackjackjack55 3 years ago
jackjackjack you said the same thing for the magnavex project to the letter. whats up with that?
CplWalker176 3 years ago
See Bedini's SSD for that run. I try now without the coils and battery.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
try the base in water make the base float can it turn a paddle wheel
1adamtroye 3 years ago
Show me! Your idea....
anandaadhar 3 years ago
hydroponic magnetic water treatment gos something like this ,stir water 20 1 way then reverse once repeat ,well its meant to stimulate plant growth ,worth a thought
1adamtroye 3 years ago
The cakra spins backwards very easily indeed. There is a guy with a rubber band system: first cycles forward, then backward. Could a be useful someday, someway. Keep me posted.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
if power is needed to run 1 of these designs can it supply it own, once it is up and running, thats the big question.
again i know shit but the answer is there
the neg an pos of a mag try using water as a container
1adamtroye 3 years ago
The idea is to draw energy from the space around it. Will this wheel do the trick? That is the research question. It certainly takes good engineering better than I show here.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
good on ya i know 3 parts of fuck all but all you people trying and steorn look at the stuff he is using that cost dollars if it can be done at least these people are taking all the no s away maybe 1 day there is a yes
1adamtroye 3 years ago
yes
anandaadhar 3 years ago
I'm deeply impressed with the level of motivation and dedication that all you guys are putting into these ideas - incidently, you missed out Stan Meyer and Griggs from your overunity patent list. However, I have yet to see any truly convincing evidence of overunity. The strive to produce even more efficient machines should not be overlooked even getting close to 100% is a worthwhile cause, and of course it's great fun too - Keep it up chaps.
furzeham 4 years ago
Check the website of Naudin. He did several replications and proved overunity. E,g, the MEG of Bearden proved right to be overunity. Bedini has a machine running on its own self charged battery for 15 years. Recently Prain patented an overunity device 6.2 volts out 3 volts in. There is ample proof and Griggs and Meyer we also know as sucesses.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
Bedini, Bearden and Finsrud all delivered convincing proof. Bedini is widely replicated. Bearden is proven by Naudin and Finsrud is still running after all these years, but difficult to replicate. Consider what we try here a simplification of Finsrud's.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
the energy used for pulsing is higher than the energy (that could be) delivered by one revolution of the wheel.
of heb ik het fout? :)
crippled82 4 years ago
That is true for closed systems. The question is whether a magnet wheel can pick up energy from the outside...
anandaadhar 4 years ago
some ideas youtube dot com / watch?v=yVkKvgKYkjo
Shows a magnetic weel spin by gravity and exited by electric force 4 a coil
alex681219 4 years ago
Indeed interesting type of PMM. It is ossible indeed to make such a thing as displayed. How long did it run on end?
anandaadhar 4 years ago
One of a zillion hand-powered devices which are not overunity. Everyone so far has failed to build the feedback circuit necessary for a self-runner with these magnet motors.
shubus 4 years ago
That doesn't mean we should stop trying. What I offer here is an improvement on the efficiency of driving a wheel. With this wheel one pulse per cycle suffices. And the faster the thing goes, the less energy for the pulse is needed. Others need more.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
i dont say its overunity, but its a hella efficient mechanical energy to electricity turbine if done on a huger scale.
pimpmastahanh 4 years ago
We go for the full proof, but indeed it is assuredly an efficient thing already.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
I am hoping that this device is something more special than a pendulum in a clock. Please reply anandaadhar if you don't quite understand what I mean.
wasssup1990 4 years ago
That is what we are researching: is this magnetic interaction more that another mechanical transmission of the impuls? The OC MPMM design of the Steorn forum members (see my favorites) proves that such a thing can run and even speed up for at least three hours. The replication ise troublesome, but several have achieved this overunity effect already.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
very nice, videos. Vrey informative. I eould ask that you explain magnetic overunity in more simple terms, also the 3 proofs i.e 1. electric, 2. electro mechanical etc.. can you explain these a little more?
Thank you
iain9876 4 years ago
Magnetic overunity is the work done by a magnet. Simply sticking up a weight e.g. The three proofs are all there, but the mechanical aspect was as yet difficult to reproduce. So that is what weare afetr: easily replicable proof of the containment of magnetic overunity.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
the guy's a little dreamer - the little energy is actually only to sustain the turing of the flying weel - nothing new
phoebus1966 4 years ago
the guy studied a little and concluded that all there is to do is feedback the overunity. Wake up to what I say here.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
The fly wheel is the basic concept for all engines you idiot! also, It takes dreamers to change the way we live and think outwith the box we all live in....it was dreamers who now allow us to fly in aeroplanes, cars, trains, build roads, bridges, etc.....it was fools like you in those days who said...."only birds can fly, humans never will!"
iain9876 4 years ago
Sorry I meant to say. "The fly wheel is the basic testing portal fot all experimental engines"....didn't you learn that in school? unless you have a huge budget to spend on a hobby....I like this guy would use what works around me. Your getting a free valuable lesson here in 5 videos. Appreciate that you retard!
iain9876 4 years ago
experimental engines?...oops I meant energy...well ok there is the lightbulb too...oh well its one of the basic testing thingys anyways!
iain9876 4 years ago
Thanks for the support
anandaadhar 3 years ago
the conservation of energy' states that the total amount of energy in any isolated system remains constant but can't be recreated, although it may change forms!
dragonlover022 4 years ago
Right you are with a closed system. The question is whether we have an open system able to catch the energy from the gravitons (ethermagnetic particles of space) polarized by the manets. We need the original Maxwell calculating for open systems.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
manets=magnets
anandaadhar 4 years ago
You say "I add a little extra energy". That's the whole point that debunks every perpetual motion machine.
riparianlife97701 4 years ago
I expect that starting it up requires the extra energy, but that sustaining the energy, the wheel takes it over since a faster spin requires less effort to maintain. The basic question remaining is: can we lead back the supposed overuity of the magnets back into the pulse-mechanism?
anandaadhar 4 years ago
Anandaarhar,
Besides essentially stabilizing that arm you need to build a spring loaded cam not unlike a in a conventional engine. Turn the stator into a cam.
Good Luck,
Yozhik17 4 years ago
I had the same idea, use a cam and springs. Just make sure u get the right timing, and don't lose too much of the kinetic energy to the friction in such an add on mechanism.
MachineTen 4 years ago
MachineTen,
How did that idea work out?
Yozhik17 4 years ago
still plaling with the cam. But the spring that i have seems to have more potentinal energy than the repelling force of the magnets.
MachineTen 4 years ago
Indeed that keeps you going. Are you really trying something as you suggest here? I'd like to see that! It is just a matter of controlling the living energy of the universe you know. We never create it, we just are to harness it. Please watch my latest video about the IPMM MAN device and the discussions at the overunity forum if you care.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
It seem that with little movement the wheel turns. Make a giant one awsome!
uncleshorty 4 years ago
All in time, it is all in time....
anandaadhar 3 years ago