Nassim Haramein 2/45

[Starsandfunk]

Anyone who likes this will love the work of Kent Hovind. He also has a groundbreaking theory that the earth was just 'created' by God just 6,000 years ago!

Hovind has even more loyal followers than Haramein and due to the brilliance of his theory and colourful explanation he doesn't even need evidence to back it up. Of course those 'close minded' scientists try and disprove him with their dogmatic views on fossil records, geology, evolution, radiometric dating, planetry science, etc.

[Senorvecino]

@DemonReacher, that's an excellent example: matter + antimatter = 0. If we can think of the universe in terms of value rather than shape, we can think of the "Big Bang" as, perhaps, "+ 1", and "1" as comprising all content of the universe from the quantum level to the most massive sized object (including matter and antimatter, which are physical representations of energy). "2" would be the next in a series of universes (multiverse), which is ALSO a "0".

[justincgs]

His theory implies that the nucleus of a single atom of hydrogen has a mass of nearly a billion tons!!!

[LifeIsABigPuzzle]

I think what the teacher was trying to teach the kids was that 2D objects do not exist in our 3D universe except for on paper. 2D objects on paper are abstract and theoretical while 3D objects that we can feel and touch are real. So the cube on the paper was a theoretical 3D object but it did not exist in reality. But the teacher was just trying to explain it to the kids using a black board. Maybe the teacher should have had a real cube with him though.

[gr8vibes2]

He seems bright, emphasis on seems. There's some huge flaws.

1) How does zooming out and zooming in solve the riddle?

2) Dimension is just a word to describe something mathematical, there may or may not be anything more to it than that. To say there is is as narrow minded as to say there isn't.

[Senorvecino]

And at 8:00 minutes...he concludes with a logical thought, that what "exists" is, in fact, just that "dot". My approach has resulted in, not a "dot", but a ZERO...that mathematical figure that represents NOTHINGNESS. And from THAT ZERO, ALL THINGS EMANATE. Whether linearly (left and right, plus or minus) or directionally (up and down, and all points between) are other values. A -1 is not a subtraction, but a negative value (infinitely extending). Same as +1 is not an addition, but a positive...

[TheMushshroom]

@Senorvecino you are awesome :-)

[DemonReacher]

@Senorvecino I had a very similar revelation about nothingness as well. Another way to put the 1 - 1 = 0 is matter + antimatter = 0

[Senorvecino]

What he says at about 06:40 about going "above the bus" and "above the planet" etc., I have experienced as a mental exercise. In my "mind's eye" (that is, not REALLY, but only MENTALLY) I tend to hover above the Earth whenever I seek the answer to a question regarding, for example, something within the Earth, or upon it. Like, say...humanity as a whole, which gives answers to humanity as an individual "particle"...this exercise actually clears the mind and helps one think.

[RainyDaysProject]

whats with all the negativity on this page? all i can say is have an open mind. all his theories are becoming fact! i love this guy. he thinks out of the box

Nuff Said...

[steeltable218]

@RainyDaysProject Sorry, it's not 'nuff said'. Pointing out mistakes, criticism and engaging debate is not negative in any sense. Having an open mind does not mean blindly accepting any rubbish. His theories are not 'becoming fact' in any sense. Actually, his theories go blithely against established facts.

[TheArthen]

alot of resistance from science-minded pple here. healthy and awesome! they don't seem interested in adopting other mindsets though.......

[steeltable218]

@TheArthen Hey, if the other mindset is logically valid and based on sound evidence, call me Mr Adoption! Until then...

[TheArthen]

@steeltable218

u're exactly what i'm talkin abt ;)

[steeltable218]

@TheArthen Yes, I realised that. I'm wondering what the process of 'adopting other mindsets' entails. Is it believing something with good reason? Solid evidence, sound reasoned argument, common, testable experience? Or because it makes us feel good inside? Says 'yes' to what we already believe? Affirms us? Makes us feel as if we belong? How interested are we in adopting mindsets that challenge our beliefs? Are we courageous enough to accept facts we don't like? That's open-mindedness.

[TheArthen]

@steeltable218

yup yup! Thank you for your courage. Courage is extremely important. I mean look, Im for BOTH schools of thought. I see them as ONE. The problem with this world, is that we automatically push each other into just ONE corner, instead of A FEW corners. Ever noticed that? hahaha "Either this or that, hybrids fuck off please" kind of attitude!

[steeltable218]

@TheArthen Yup, beliefs and reasons for belief are a moveable feast, and that's why the scientific method is vital as a compass. Emotional reasons for believing things abound in the world, in religion, art, literature, relationships etc and will never go away (a boring world if they did). But here, context is important. Haramein claims a scientific stance with proof, and delivers to his audience as such. And he has none. I agree that we're too ready to polarise people and their beliefs.

[TheMushshroom]

@steeltable218 "Haramein claims a scientific stance with proof, and delivers to his audience as such. And he has none." Watch "the double slit experiment". Contemplate it. What role does our imaginations/focus/awareness REALLY play in the reality precious Science is based on. Current idea of Science assumes there is already a set reality that we can't change and that we are separate from it. Nassim demonstrates the understanding we are at the very core and ONE with it. It's time to let go.

[steeltable218]

@TheArthen I agree brother, science is healthy and awesome! If a new mindset comes along that is rigorously provable, and agrees with observable fact, I'll be the first to consider it. But if the other mindset is based on a load of flaky bollocks (God, there's an image...), I don't think it's a very healthy area to move into. And I strongly advise you don't either.

[amcanmike]

smart man

[steeltable218]

Hang on, only 35% of viewers who watch video 1 bother going on to video 2. That's a huge bounce rate! I guess most people don't recognise visionary genius when they see it.

[tissetatten]

@steeltable218 mabe its beus he doesent get to the point, just rambles on with out facts, if he started with facts insted of things that "happend" to him, if you belive in it anyway..

[steeltable218]

@tissetatten But he does that for all 45 videos.

[CabreraPleyadiano]

Gracias por compartir esta informacion, este hombre es una amenaza para las instituciones oficiales, seguro por eso lo desaparecieron de Wikipedia.

[steeltable218]

The six planes in 3D modelling aren't real? And he thinks he's the only one who knows this? NO mathematician believes the 6 planes are literally real, they're just models, tools! And adding them up to make Non-Existence to the 4th makes him some kind of savant? My God, the delusion of this man...!

[MONSQUEEKY]

This is the Greatest and most logical Unified Field theory Ever!!!! It explains how this universe is really a contradictory information feedback loop between two opposite polarities that can't exist with out the other because they define eachother. Positivity=Negativity Existance=Nonexistance Internal=External Reality=Mind Truth=Lie Possibility=Imposibility PhysicalMatter=EmptySpace Consious=Unconcious Yin=Yang ect... and where these two polarities intersect is the 0-point (Self Awarenss)

[NassimHarameinVedas]

This is alternative science, there is mainstream science as well as secret government science far ahead of what we have in the public spheres of knowledge.

Believe what You want, it changes nothing. The Creation Is and Prime Creator Is.

What are You? Discover.

Just ask Yourself, who has a vested interest to deceive You and keep You perceiving a certain set of paradigms, perpetuating the collective zeitgeist?

∞Hare Krsna∞

[MONSQUEEKY]

@NassimHarameinVedas Too True. I totally agree. If This Science went mainstream it would have a DEVASTATING blow on O.P.E.C and all the major Energy giants in the world. As a matter of fact if you look at the Masonic Symbol you'll see that it has a striking resembalance to Nassim's dynamic system. The Compasss pointing upward= the Positive polarity The Square pointing downward= the Negative polarity and the "G" in the center= the Singularity (Self Awarness)

[steeltable218]

@MONSQUEEKY But this isn't science, because he uses context, sematics, connotation and denotation as he sees fit to fit with his ideas. In other words it can explain everything and nothing at the same time, and thence is worth nothing scientifically. And as it isn't science, it can never enter the scientific mainstream by definition.

[NassimHarameinVedas]

@MONSQUEEKY - Indeed. This entire "reality" of three dimensional time space aka material world aka holofractographic universe is a veil, an illusion what the ancient Vedas call "maya".

Now, we live on a 3D morontia evolutionary sphere. Everything is allowed, therefore many lessons are learned. Polarity aka Duality is everywhere here.

Light/Dark, male/female, positive/negative etc.

What these mainstream materialists don't comprehend is the vast esoteric societies of duality on this planet.

[steeltable218]

@NassimHarameinVedas What are these "vast esoteric societies of duality"?

[NassimHarameinVedas]

@MONSQUEEKY - The vast polarity in society, are the two forces of dark and light.

Service to self (evil) vs Service to others (good).

Those in charge of the global market system, which mode of conduct are they in?

Mode of goodness? Mode of passion or ignorance? You tell me.

All the wealth of this world is in the hands of no more than 300 individuals.

Those in power do whatever it is necessary to stay in power. They control media, education, economy. Surely they don't wish to empower us all.

[NassimHarameinVedas]

@MONSQUEEKY - Ultimately, this is about individual empowerment. Cosmic Consciousness and beyond. The details of the science are more or less irrelevant and subject to individual semantics, opinions & perceptions.

This work is not unlike Nikolai Tesla's experiments. Both desired to develop technology and method to empower the individual and free them from the energy vampires aka the "elite".

This argument, however, is lost on mainstream indoctrinated people who don't own their perceptions.

[TheBobathon]

@NassimHarameinVedas Hey, did Haramein write the Vedas too? His own, more correct version? Wouldn't surprise me at all.

I'm sure Tesla would approve of your clichés about his ideas too. Please tell us about who Einstein really is too while you're at it, that would be novel.

I don't see what's spiritually beneficial about someone expressing their disdain of great swathes of human endeavour, as you are doing here.

I'm sure you think you're right, like all prejudiced people, but it's ugly as hell.

[NassimHarameinVedas]

@TheBobathon - Indeed. Nobody is right. In separateness, only You are right.

Thanks for sharing that fact.

[TheBobathon]

@NassimHarameinVedas dude, you so deep.

So you don't really have anything to say on the character of absolutely everyone in politics, education, science, economics, and everyone who doesn't subscribe to your particular version of New Age philosophy, and how they're all indoctrinated and manipulative and incapable of clear vision like yourself.

Good. Because that would be pretty sick.

[BenjiPars]

@NassimHarameinVedas

are u the same man in the video ?

cause Nassim is a Persian name / Iranian

[NassimHarameinVedas]

@NassimHarameinVedas - My name is Almir, as stated on my channel.

[TheMinusTen]

This guy makes me wanna punch babies.

[letmeseethat1]

With out going down the path that Nassim traveled its hard to see the validity in what hes teaching here. We just dismiss stuff that we think defies our reality. We're in a box. A filtering templet known as an ego. Once you step outside the box and see that reality is what you make it, this simple vortex theory makes more sense than anything else proposed, EVEN if its been realized before Nassim. Most of Teslas inventions were in the Vedas.... so? Don't be so quick to dismiss things.

[marcnpalmer]

The opening story is great! Almost as good as when Buckminster Fuller told it originally

.

[omiswheretheheartis]

@marcnpalmer

yes, but there have been many times when I have come to "realizations" that were completely unique to me, only to read, or see someone in an interview a year or so later, that had a very similar experience. Just like movies being released at the same time that seem to echo each other. Not saying he didn't rip it off..haha..maybe he did,.. but it is also quite possible that both could have had the same experience.

[SorryWereOutOfNames]

Intresting mind, only too bad for the video quality

[onefeather2]

i guess the people who DO NOT like Nassim believe that Lucy and the piltdown man are really real!! that shows one how science really is and the people who follow them. GREAT for Nassim..We need more like him, some people have believed a Lie for so long they don't know truth, the Lie becomes the truth.

[MONSQUEEKY]

@onefeather2 So True

[dedskin1]

i cant belive this guy...first he tells me that he does not know what is dimension,that he learned it at the age of 10, i thought like the guy was really stupid kid,then ,10 minutes later ,he knows about the fractals,galaxy all kind of things...look man i dont know english that good but i know that he is full of bulshiit...this part of his childhood is 10 minutes of pure lie,if u would like to hear how does a smart grown man lie i would not come up with a better example,period!

[Vejita12]

@dedskin1

Have you heard about Chopin or Picasso, they began to show their talent at a similar age.

Haramein's math, phisics and solution of field equation stand and are accepted by more and more phisisist around the world, last year he recieved the best paper award in the field of “Physics, Quantum Mechanics, Relativity, Field Theory, and Gravitation.” for that work.

He wasn't telling that he hadn't understood what a dimension is, he was mocking his teachers' explanation.

[TheBobathon]

@Vejita12 ok, so his teacher was wrong if he said that, so what? No mathematician would say anything like that, and it's nothing like how scientists view dimensions, or ever have. It's a straw man.

Also look again at that 'award'. It's the 'best paper' in that field at a single small computer systems conference, as judged by some other people at that computer systems conference. His followers wave it about as if it's the Nobel Prize.

Where are these 'more and more physisist around the world'?

[Vejita12]

@TheBobathon

Nothing about that, its a story for the audience, how he got interested into phisics.

Yeah, I know that its a bullshit award, but bullshit or not bullshit award it was reviewed by who, gardners?

I'm probably more sceptical than you about his theories, especially those about pyramids, etc. but his approach is intriuging and not completely without merit.

And its been always about the approach and intuition, we can sort out the math later, like always. :)

[TheBobathon]

@Vejita12 Yes, you start with intuition, but then "whatever is inconsistent with the facts, no matter how fond of it we are, must be discarded or revised" (Sagan). If you sort out the math and it tells you that your intriguing theories contradict the real world, you got to know when to let go.

If you just want to draw in the crowds and draw in the cash, then of course you'll hold onto your intriguing theory and string people along. This is what he does, and it seems pretty sick to me.

[dedskin1]

@Vejita12 no,picasso? what is that,a kind of oil/cream :) if u cant see that he made up the story to explain some thing that is your problem,lack of intelligence ...i cant help u with that...u must learn to look be-twine the lines...story about his talent is fake ,only talent there is storytellin...he is damn good in it,i base that assumption on the fact that he managed to make u all to believe in it. didnt mean to offend anybody here . thank you

[05891460]

He's seems intent on convincing us that he was a childhood genius.

[AirFiveR]

I luev dis guy! Hey ticher, leafe dem kidz elone! He is right. Listen up people. This stuff sounds crazy but the truth is stranger than fiction.

[carolnikkiperry]

so far, his intuition that leads him to the fractal nature of the universe makes sense to me, but I am least agree when he said that the only thing that exists is the point and that all information is available at any point no matter what fractal level where you are.

Does he refer to the structure of the vacuum when he speaks about "'information"? because if it is so,that is a 3D structure that appears as an point at our scale and I don't see yet the continuous link between every point.

[carolnikkiperry]

because until now he doesn't really refute the non-existence of of our 3D space in wich we live. Rather he seems to enhance the fractal nature of the universe where everything is actually a point when our sight is directed to a global view far enough to reduce what we observe to apoint. but from the reverse view, due to the fractal nature of the universe, one could say that everything is infinite.

[carolnikkiperry]

so as far as I understand him to that moment there is always 3D. we can named each components of the 3D but they don't existe by themself, they exist as a whole entity.

[lego3366]

Nevermind, it's working now.

[lego3366]

I can't see anything past 6:00. I've tried refreshing the page, but it just refuses to play past that point.

[TheMikejk]

PapeModa.

Would you have any links to that information or confirmation that Haramein's research has been accepted by peer-reviewed sources please?

[BEERIOUS]

thrown out just like every ground breaking theory in history at first was. to me it means more that the science community ignores him. If they didn't they would have to admit thier careers mean nothing. every maintstream field of science has giant holes why would physics be any different?

[Karma01010]

This is the BIG LIE - that "every theory" was at first "thrown out".

The lie comes about because some people confuse "Asking For Evidence" with "Throwing Out" ! Not the same thing at all !

Yes, new theories are opposed and debated, that's how science works, ideas have to compete with each other, be subjected to testing, so that only the best ideas get thru the filter.

Science progresses because it is open to all, but it weeds out the bullshit from the good stuff by testing it.

[dedskin1]

@Karma01010 "Science progresses because it is open to all" how can u say taht,how old are u. Im 23. and i can give u 5 names in 5 minutes of man ,phd doctors witch were thrown out from university's becouse of their ideas. M8 , i dont know about progres of science but it is not open to all and that is a fact,cant belive what u have said,cant belive what he said,cant belive u ppl

" but it weeds out the bullshit from the good stuff by testing it." to this i will say 2 words ROYAL RIFE

[ParapaDrifter]

@Karma01010 -- "Science progresses because it is open to all, but it weeds out the bullshit from the good stuff by testing it."

In a perfect world, yes. But I have a hard time believing this world is as "perfect" or pious as you'd hope. Scientists are subject to the same kind of vices as anyone else. A PhD doesn't remove someone's faults, same goes for institutions...which can still succumb to groupthink.

Why does everyone talk about Science as a proper noun, it;s a tool not a religion.

[hammergio20]

@ParapaDrifter; Religion's more of a tool than science. At the very least, science is based on observable and measurable evidence.If Nassim's theories are true, but won't get recognized because of others' biases; eventually, someone will postulate this same theory and it will eventually get confirmed. In the name of Deoxy-Rhibonucleic-Acid, Amen.

[ParapaDrifter]

@hammergio20 I'm sorry, is Nassim Haramein the only one advocating what he says? How about Marko Rodin....

I suppose I could just sum up your argument with just "eventually"

If true, eventually it will be confirmed... great one. "let us pray and hope" i suppose is what you are saying and that another dark age of superstiton doesn't envelop the world once more.

Fluoridation is safe <---- state superstition

There is no cancer cure <---- industry superstition

[hammergio20]

@ParapaDrifter Having support from others doesn't validate a theory. Yes, eventually, if it is valid. Of course his theory is ignored, it claims all we know is wrong! I agree with your last statement, let's hope we don't get enveloped in a dark world. As for Nassim's work getting peer reviewed I would also love to follow up on that.

[ikemkrueger]

@Karma01010 This approach is to slow these days. Scientist think in to small boundaries. They build their own "brain cage".

[indie3]

Most of Harameins theories fall into the category "not even wrong". Debunking them is like trying to nail custard to the wall.

I have no higher qualifications in physics, yet within a few minutes of watching Haramein I could see that he is a fraud. I understood the tricks he was playing, how he constructs straw man arguments, designed to appeal to the whacko demographic. It is when when I DON'T fully understand some new physics that I leave my opinion open, for example Garrett Lisi's work.

[TheMikejk]

indie3.

Obviously, the guy is trying to build up a presentation style with clever anecdotes in order to entertain his viewers in a long setting. This is exactly what Julius Sumner Miller did. I think you need more than a "few minutes" to pass judgement.

[indie3]

No, that is precisely my point, I don't need more than a few minutes to see that he is a fraud, it is blindingly obvious. Anybody with a basic scientific education can do the same. However, I did watch more of his stuff, just in case he came up with something worthwhile. He didn't. He got worse, talking crap about comets, pyramids, and crystals. Typical new age sewage. His "anecdotes" are designed specifically to please nutballs. He gives them exactly what they want to hear. That is his skill.

[elktricista]

I like Nassim shows!!!!

He is not a scientist (he don't even want to be)

Maybe he is like a Magician or illusionist that plays with (not always well understood) classical science theories, but his show can open the minds better than the current science education, obsolete

Go ahead, Nassim, forget 2012 end of the world, learn more about science, and please, be perfectionist, less esoterical, be concrete, you have the WAY to explain complex things, but dont get lost yourself!!!

[davidstrohmayer]

he is a scientist. he published some papers. some where been peer-reviewed, some are on the way.

but he is not a "normal" scientist ^^

[Xatazacxataamac]

He ain't a scientist he's more like a systemic! Couse thats the age were in, "From Science to Systemics" as Förster said!

[TheBobathon]

He published them himself. None have been peer reviewed. He's no scientist.

[TheMikejk]

Scientists are nothing much these days because they fear losing tenure. Most lack the courage to say what this man says.

[TheBobathon]

@TheMikejk They lack the stupidity to say it. :-)

Just because something is 'bold' doesn't make it true. Look for the reasons why what he says are NOT true. They're everywhere.

It doesn't ring true that hundreds of thousands of scientists have not all decided not to say anything about universe-shattering theories because their scared. Any one of them would be made for life if they could back up a theory like that with evidence. We're not in the 16th century any more.

[TheBobathon]

(sorry, that should say "scientists have all")

[TheMikejk]

The scientists definitely are scared. I went to university too and it was full of scared academics (scientists); scared witless of losing their positions. Refute that if you can. Of course you can't.

[TheMikejk]

By the way, it's not "their" scared; it's "they're" scared. You are obviously a poorly educated debunker.

[TheBobathon]

Apologies for the spelling error.

And I wouldn't want to refute the fact that you met some scientists who feared losing their positions. I'm sorry they put you off.

[TheMikejk]

TheBobathon:

All you've done is attack this guy without actually analysing his contentions. Ok if you don't like what he says you have the right to your opinion. But ad hominem attacks are not "scientific". Agreed? It seems to me that there is a trend for this kind of ad hominem debunking these days. Where is the "truth" in that?

[TheBobathon]

It's not an "ad hominem" to point out that nobody anywhere in the scientific community takes any of his ideas seriously.

Also, I've analysed his ideas in some detail if you're interested - try "haramein fraud" in google.

I could go on about how a dot on a blackboard is supposed to be a *symbol* for a zero-dimensional conceptual entity, whereas the thing you see is made of three-dimensional chalk particles, or that nobody would claim that six 2D objects can make a 3D one, etc. if you like...

[TheMikejk]

TheBobathon.

I did google "haramein fraud" and got 20,000+ results. You will have to be more specific. To be fair, I will read your analysis if you can pinpoint the website more precisely. With thanks.

[TheBobathon]

Sorry - it's Nassim Haramein, fraud or sage.

[TheMikejk]

"I've presented my main points more thoroughly in a separate post here. [NB I haven't posted this yet, but I will before long]"

As soon as you post them, I resolve to read them in full. Thanks.

[davidstrohmayer]

i dont think so

[TheBobathon]

He can open minds... but he fills them with sparkly rubbish! A lot of people love sparkly rubbish.

Don't we value the truth any more? Truth that can be tested, investigated, thought through?

[dasgroover]

Plasma physics describes the electric nature of the universe and gives a perfect description of all the phenomenon the nuclear model cannot. The unique nature of plasma events is that they are scalar - the observable event in a laboratory is the very same observable event structure of any nebula or star. The nuclear model using gravity cannot account for the nature of these super structures other than to formulate 'hidden causative factors' such as mysterious dark matter - even black holes

[trashmail8]

No need to vote down plasma physics, google Novel Prize winner Hannes Alfvén.

[trashmail8]

I meant "Nobel Prize" of course, where's my coffee!?!

[zybyl]

for "ahead of the curve" read "completely round the bend"

[thecitywalls]

this guy is way ahead of the curve.

[indie3]

rongrite, infinite divisibility is an abstract mathematical concept, it simply doesn't apply to real objects, learn some quantum mechanics.

[rongrite]

A point shows position, but has no area.

...and it also happens to have infinite divisibility.

Thus infinite parts, thus infinite mass.

[indie3]

wex; NO ONE in legitimate science today thinks that atomic scale processes obey Classical laws. Where the fuck do you GET these lies from?? If every proton-sized volume became a proton the whole universe would be solid, light couldn't travel. The "vacuum energy" is not what you think it is.

Quantum Mechanics (proven to more accuracy than any theory ever) was developed precisely because at small scales particles do NOT behave Classically.

[indie3]

36squared --- Haramein's "approach" is to play numerological games by assuming that subatomic particles behave according to Classical macroscopic physics. They don't! We've moved past the model where electrons and nuclei are like little solar systems.

And if the "vacuum energy" of tiny regions of "empty space" hold enough equivalent mass to contain a proton, then every such volume of space should become a proton. Empty space would not exist. I await your pseudoscientific explanation.

[wexarexthexStorm]

Not true, he uses the same assumptions made by scientific super computing today (which plays a huge part in chem and phys today).

Every such space DOES become and IS a proton. Reread.

[dasgroover]

anybody read his award math paper?

any quotes anyone might recall?

[36squared]

I worked on "the origin of spin" for the last 2 months and found myself frustrated with the implications. I printed his "schwarzschild proton" about a week ago and just finished it. Amazing approach

[dasgroover]

yes, the scale is not according to SIZE but according to weight and frequency -

[zybyl]

Yes, Zionist, a lot of filler. Nassim sells sets of 4 DVDs for 84 dollars. See his website. He need$ LOT$ of Filler$.

[ZionistHunter2]

There's alot of filler in here...2nd 10 minute segment and nothing happening.

[Karma01010]

Skunk, the keppe motor is just one more "over unity" SCAM in a long history of previous scams from cranks like Bedini and Bearden and Steorn. Totally bogus. Totally shameless.

[theskunkmeister]

This dude is AWESOME!

@Karma01010

I am not implying anything about conspiracies, you are!

It is a fact that a Keppe motor is getting energy from zeropoint field.

Therefore it is evident that you are also trying to spread disinformation. And that in fact, you are "hiding" your provocative "anti" intentions. LOL

Secondly, You shouldn't call me a wacko!

I wish you stop responding is such 'retarded' manner, 'coz it only reflects your stupidity.

[Karma01010]

Like most anti-establishment wackos, theskunkmeister doesn't deal in verifiable facts, but hides behind retarded conspiracy theories.

[theskunkmeister]

It is evident that Indie3 is spreading the wrong information, which is based on the inverse psychology that Norberto Keppe is explaining is his view of a New physics of dis-inverted metaphysics. You are a victim inversion.

[indie3]

Whether you "liked" mainstream science is beside the point, real science is often counter-intuitive and difficult to understand, but it is based on real evidence and rigorous proof (and it works! Mainstream science gave you the computer that you are now reading this on). Nassims nonsense has no supporting evidence whatsoever. His "physics" is overflowing with glaring errors.

[RayneMarina]

i never liked mainstream science, this guy makes more sense, he's a genius

[indie3]

myso2008; If you find this dude interesting, I hope you will buy his set of four DVDs. EIGHTY FIVE DOLLARS. (I regard it as a tax on gullibility).

All Haramein fans, please buy his DVDs, pay your Gullibility Tax.

P.S. If Einstein was alive today, can you imagine him selling DVDs to the lay public? No, he would do what he did, submit his work to the Physics community and have it accepted.

[myso2008]

good ideas this dude is interesting

[Karma01010]

mad as a box of frogs! out of his fucking tree! a complete fruit loop!

[Muralartist1]

FINALLY!!! I am soo excited this man has brought his works to us..He is a godsend! This is information that I have felt intuitively (not is such detail or complexity) for years!

[indie3]

Pure woo! Get an education, and you will be able to see this fruitcake for what he really is. Or dont get an education, and carry on being gullible.

[SubliminalAttraction]

This just gets better and better!

[FreeSoulz444]

he sounds like borat LOL but a very smart 1

[mattspurlock]

does anyone else think it's strange that the poster of this video series has the name isis?

[Hexal68]

good video but the quality is really bad for this one, closer to end though.

[miuchay]

XxDregonxX, Nassin didn't like your comentary about women.., sorry about that, try not to judge people so you wont be judge.

[Djole0]

what is wrong with this guy?

[zapproowsdower]

Yeah I think he's suffering from a bad case of english-not-being-his-first-la­nguage-itis - what a weirdo!

[NassimHarameinVedas]

Nassim Haramein is great! Recommended to all detectives of time and space and those seeking truth to acquire Nassim Harameins 4-DVD set "Crossing the Event Horizon"

We are quite literally the eyes and ears of the creator of the universe, prime creator, God, Allah and the original word KRSNA (meaning All Attractive).

We are spiritual beings in material bodies, our duty is to transcend from material to spiritual consciousness also known as Krsna Consciousness!

∞ HARE KRSNA ∞

[XxDregonxX]

It goes to show you that you don't listen to women. It's always about feelings, emotions, and etc, to them. "I don't feel infinite" She said. ::rolls eyes:: I'm glad Nassim Haramein didn't take her advice. Instead it made him want to prove his theory even more. Bravo, Nassim Haramein.

[rapsucks1776]

There's a guy named Felipe Sparx that seems to have stolen Haramein's ideas and seems to try to be passing them off as his own. He briefly mentions Wicock, Haramein, in passing, but seems to be totally ripping off wholesale, the fruits of Haramein's work. If you visit Felipe's vids, please feel free to call him out as the fraud he appears to be

[StopTheRobberydotcom]

I'm not sure that's the case.. After reading your post I checked out Fellipe and he says "I think the sun has a black hole in the centre". and then he goes onto describing that he heard it from nassim.

[rapsucks1776]

"existence," rather

[rapsucks1776]

Haramein made a slight flub. You don't get non-existance to the 4th, you get non-existance cubed, since 3d doesn't exist in the addition, so it can't be factored in. 0D, 1D, 2D = non-existance. 0d + 1D + 2D = non-extistance^3

[101folt]

X^4 is what? (X)(X)(X)(X)

4 of them, you count the first

4 ideas on dimensions gives you (non-existence^4)

each dimension's an X

[jsettica]

It's vary interesting how little we know about our existence, to say that he does not know what he is talking about. Only indicates how little or next to nothing you know. In this reality all information is valid just because you don't agree with it does not change that. For there are many more things that this reality holds the we can't even comprehend yet. It will just as valid as all other information that is going to come out. Are you going to be open enough to see it when the time comes.

[truthseek18]

Has this guy been refuted at all? The only criticism of him that I ever see is people calling him names, stating their personal bias against him, or saying without elaboration or citations, "anybody who knows anything about science knows to reject him," which all seem to be smear tactics and incapable of refuting the theories that he stated.

[charronfamilyconnect]

This guy reminds me of Howie Mandel for some reason. I guess there is a resemblance between him and Howie. I wonder if this guy is a member of the chosen people O/T group as well??

[Databamse]

what a fucking moron. "The universe is a dot" how many years did he spend to find that out. HA HA HA HA. thats something i came about in the kinders garden when i was 4.

[AnonymusBeats]

smh...kinders garden

Let me guess, you didn't graduate "Highs Schools"

lol

[BinAlladin]

you sens to be fucking moron,what have you done in your life gay-boy?

[Anothercoilgun]

I do not want to scare any of you but.... I hope you know that we are born with infinite knowledge. Every possible outcome, time, location, and interaction you will ever account for is there from conception. All we are doing through life is narrowing down possibilities and knowledge. Knowledge is energy and energy cannot be created nor destroyed but transformed. Every thing you will know you already knew driven by your choices. Choice is transfer of energy. Choose wisely.

[Anothercoilgun]

THIEFT! Now that is something I clearly understand. I have been robbed by conventional thinking my whole life. Under long term tough circumstances I begin to slowly wake up and finally realized that wool was being pooled over my head.

Thank God I am not alone.

[xenorun]

Amazing amazing man. Great information here folks (:

5*

[hosnflos]

This dude is a crackbaby

[faszika]

dis dude rocks, good sense of humor

[rcacad]

Ok, fractial nature of the universe is cool BUT Einstein's relativity is just that. Nassim goes on and on about this but he is essentiall describing E's relativity theory but just in a more poetic way. Einst. even concluded himself about the "fractional parts of the whole" idea. Relativity was an extention further and doesnt just say ok, where infinantly part of a bigger whole but says there are other inter related forces like gravity that are porportionally "relative" the whole......big whoop.

[Deliveryboy09]

Eisntein's relativity equations are missing torque and coriolis effects, Nassim incorporated them into the equation.

[Lad22nd]

Perhaps the 3d cube with question mark is pandoras box.

[Lad22nd]

Constant social conditioning or MIND CONTROL is what causes people to be close minded and rejective to any true wisdom even if it's proven by science.

[SomeTallGy]

Brilliant mind, not the best public speaker.. but most brilliant minds aren't

[pekoe67]

So far this reminds me of the movie 'IDIOCRACY'. I'll contine watching but not a good first impression. What's counter- intuitive about a 'non- existant "point" ' or "line" or "plane"?

I grasp it, and I'm stupid as f&ck.

[herzmeister]

I would solve that "ancient dimension riddle" in another way. It's not true that things "pop" into existence in the 3rd dimension. It's just a relative point of view. For instance, a cube also doesn't exist if it has no extension into in the 4th dimension which we perceive as time, and so on...

We don't _really_ know yet how many dimensions there are (currently hey discuss 6, 10, 11 or 22), but we could say that things finally "exist" only if they extend into any dimension.

[herzmeister]

This goes for ourselves as well, so that's what we are striving for to find out, the reason why we exist, in our longing for completeness.

The whole fractal thing that Nassim then goes about is another quality then, imho. I feel it could be true, and that's independent then of how many dimensions there really are, as the underlying mathematics are independent from that. Maybe the number if dimension is endless after all, when would kinda mean fractals upon fractals (hard to imagine).

[irontoad30]

Awesome, looks like he's talking about similar ideas I've been reading about, like Bohm's gnosis and 'the holographic universe'... looking forward to watching the rest, thanks for putting these up!

[andrekingcomedian]

Really well explained and thought out conclusions are often railed against by society as being fundamentally incorrect simply because it flies in the face of social convention. Individuals ego prevents acceptance of being told the way they have thought, and they way they have taught others to think is possibly incorrect. Personally, at video 2 of 45, Im already convinced this guy is on to something and I look forward to watching the remaining 43 instalments

[cloud0123]

Right on.

So many thing have been hidden, or discarded because it flies in the face of the modern paradigms. Look at the archeology we have found. humans existing 9 million years ago!? Oh noez..get rid of i.

[ruelmeeks88]

go sit down and keep yourself still

[pukaman2000]

Yes, this is an improper development of 3D. You are taking much to long to get to a point.

[ruelmeeks88]

go sit down i keep yourself quit