The reason why the lyrics are different is due to the fact that the album/song hadn't been recorded yet. One Hot Minute came out a year after thisi performance. Even the title of the song on most if not all bootlegs was called She Said. Aeroplane was similar with some different lyrics and the title Music Is My Aeroplane. Pea was listed as I'm A Little Pea.
@98Waffles by the time they played this concert, one hot minute was still in production... so lyrics wasn't ready yet... typical from them to unveil songs after a long hiatus...
@JBoothy94 Ahahahah, I was a teenager in the 90s and I wanted so bad to be in the 70s, they weren't that funny the 90s, remember we didn't still have the web and information came mostly from TV. It was a hell, notice that the music that has still value today from those times is all pretty sad. Enjoy your youth my friend, smash your tv.
This song is The Chili's at their hardest, most psychadelic and certaintly their most progressive...and yet a lot of people out there who call themselves fans probably have never even heard it.
well frusciante has left again so im sure the door is open for a couple of number of OHM to come back into the set! hey navarro might even rejoin haha!
I disagree that ''one hot minute'' is their best album, in my opinion its bssm but i think its a shame for Frusciante not to play not even one track from this album.. after all, he decided to leave the band at 1992 so the band had to go on.. its like erasing 6 or something years of the group's history. and,ok, tracks like ''one hot minute',warped,one big mob or 'deep kick' are out of his style but i think for example he could easily play ''walkabouts' or other ''lighter'' tracks..
So John really refused to play songs from "One Hot Minute?" What a shame, many standout songs. "Coffee Shop..." the great thing about the band is that its inherent soul transcends its components (other than Flea/Kiedis).
no way man i didnt like ohm i consider it ther worst album but i consider myself to be a huge chili pepers fan iv red anthonys auto biography 5 times i can sing along to any song and i can play 8 songs by them on my strat so just so u know FUCK YOU KEEP UR OPINION OF ME NOT BEING A REAL CHILI PEPPER FAN TO UR OWN FUCKIN SELF
they jam better with john, those were pretty standard jams. Something about frusciante just makes the chili peppers the chili peppers, better chemistry. Something about dave in that band just wasnt right
i'll give it to navarro, he had huge shoes to fill during the time JF was gone and he stepped up great, he's an awesome player and jane's addiction rocks, however it was just different. Not a bad thing but it was just a different sound coming from dave. Rock on RHCP!!!
its so beautifully structured....ever song has got layers of guitar riffs and chords supported by the infinite abilities of flea on bass and without a doubt the best drumming ive heard by chad (listen to intro of walkabout
all the lyrics are from the fucken heart by anthony....singing about his tendency to submit to addicition, the death of river and kurt... melodies are fucken strong...there was no john to come up with the tearjerker melody
wow, gargantuan sock, u really have no life do u. who cares what they do play or not, jus enjoy it, dun needa be writing and responding on every single page. my god u needa get a girlfriend
me da escalofrios esta cancion.. me llega muy adentro, lo unico que le falto a esta version es que anthony gritara mas cuando canta.. tengo 16 años yo, y no se si soy realmente o no un fan.. pero me encantan tanto los viejos como los nuevos cds.. y todavia no tuve la posibilidad de verlos, soy de argentina, pero espero algun dia poder verlos. Sueño con estar en un recital como el de kawasaki en 1990, que recital por dios.. la limaban.
OHM is underrated..den again californication is the culmination of the public to give recognition to the repute of RHCP..it's like the time has come for RHCP to be Grammied
Pretty much the same feeling here dude, By the way & stadium arcadium contains some of the worst radio-friendly, nursery-rhyme nonsense committed to record..
Whatever it was, it was a disaster. Peppers are so mainstream now it makes me sick.
Is it a coincidence that the Peppers only went shit after John came back? He refused to play any OHM and much of the pre BSSM material. I can't help but think he had something to do with it.
Then again, it could all be down to money.
In any case, OHM was their last great album, and they seem to have lost the magic.
1. the Chili peppers unanimously don't like one hot minute not just john.
2. John doesn't play Mothers milk meterial that much as he doesn't like the guitar in it. (due much distortion) as for Red hot chili peppers to the upity lift mofo plan I do not know, possibly out of respect for Hillel.
1. In my eyes, that is a show of solidarity. If john doesn't want to play OHM, the rest of them aren't exactly going to say "we don't play that because john doesn't want to".
2. John is a good enough guitar player to alter the music on MM to suit him now. And in fairness, its not mainly because of John that they don't play the UMMPP and earlier stuff. They don't play it because the mainstream audience they've attracted with Californication, BTW and SA don't like it.
1. not nessecarily as to them One Hot Minute is a dark time in the peppers line up. half their members were on drugs (anthony kiedis being the biggest example)heavily.
2. they played catholic school girls rule live in 07.
They were all on drugs in the 80s! When Hillel died was that not a dark moment for the band? Yet the 80s and early 90s was when they were at their best. They don't play much of that either.
And please, playing SGR is not enough. What about True Men Don't Kill Coyotes? American Ghost Dance? No Chump Love Sucker? All those great early songs recieve little or no attention these days. And that's a crying shame. The earlier material and OHM needs to be played live frequently if the peppers are to retain their soul.
and what about guns n roses..? they kept tourin and didnt produce any records back then.. they still play on and on their earlier releases (Appetite for Destruction).. so what i know, the fans were impatient and wants new songs/materials.. new record (Use Your Illusion)to be released.. u see, its hard in music business as u want audience to be happy.. they have to change but not completely.. but whatever it is RHCP still has the energy and sell records by the millions.. enough said..
Look... an anverage live set list for the Peppers contains around 20 songs. Of those 20, they should easily be able to find a balance between '80s, '90s (INCLUDING OHM!!!) and '00s material. But they don't. They leave the vast majority of the '80s material out, and when they do play it, it only makes up a couple of the songs in the set list. Also OHM is left out completely.
This isn't about not making new material, it's about not playing older (better) material.
Man you haven't got a clue. "they don't play OHM songs because of John" - That's one of my biggest criticisms of him. John is a total prick, you don't leave out an entire album because one member doesn't like it.
...and where did I say that it makes you a better fan to like the old stuff more? Don't put words in my mouth because you're too cretinous to understand what I'm saying. The fact their music has evolved doesn't bother me - that's a natural progression. The fact that their music has become mainstream and commercialised is what bothers me. The whole point in the Peppers was that they did what they wanted no matter what, they were alternative and didn't conform to trends in music, they set them.
Now they have gone against that, their last three albums have been radio friendly trash. Everything they did before was superb. They are no longer the exciting 'out there' band they were before, they have become a dull, commercialised band who are a shell of their former selves.
Now this time sit back and think a little before you post.
r u mad with radio-stations for playing their songs cause they think it's good music?
yeah, you're right. They should just give their albums to fans like you and not to radios, so their music doesn't become too popular. Or better, they shouldn't even take out new records. So they could just don't earn any more money and die from hunger :)
I think you still DON'T understand that their music has evolved
My God you are an idiot. It's not that they let their music be played on the radio! It's that they altered the style of their music to suit more people, therefore it's more about the money than it is about the music. That's what being commercialised is.
u r 18, right? then, r u going to tell me that you knew the peppers before releasing Californication? this Cd was released when you were f*cking 8 man, so I'm sure you knew them (and liked them) after they became the "commercialized" and "mainstream" band you hate so much now. then you discovered the old stuff, and now you hate all the fans that don't think their old stuff is better than the new one, s*cker
That is where you are hopelessly wrong. I heard the Peppers for the first time just after they released By The Way. I thought they were OK but would never have bought that album. Then someone played me their Greatest Hits album. You know what my favourite song was? Higher Ground, why? Because it had something special about it, it stood out. The first Peppers album I bought was Mother's Milk. And where did I say I hate the fans who prefer their new stuff? Still putting words in my mouth I see...
I'm sure that what a band like the Chili Peppers wants is not a wide public from all around the world like they have now. They sure would like people not to like their music. And would like YOU to be their only fan, a fan that won't like any development or experimentation in their music.
oh, in your channel you made a mistake: you put the Red Hot Chili Peppers in the music you like, aren't they too commercialized? I think u can't like a band if you hate three complete albums of them.
And I noted you like AC/DC. How could you understand the evolution in music, if you like a band that's been releasing the same album over and over?
And look at some of the other bands I like: Pearl Jam & REM. REM have evolved far far more than the Peppers yet have not become commercialised (only really mainstream album was Out of Time, and that is shit). Pearl Jam have evolved too, and have DELIBERATELY broken AWAY from the mainstream and are ANTI-COMMERCIALISATION.
I told you to think before you post, it's obvious you didn't.
please define commercialization and mainstream cause you've got a puzzle in your head, man, u don't even know what the f*ck you're talking about.
No offense, but I don't give a f*ck about what REM and pearl jam did to themselves.
I tell you, the object of a band is for more people to like their music, and the only way to do that is to sell your albums, give you're songs to the radios, take out singles, creating new music (different, ask AC/DC), if you think that's being commercial youre wrong
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Those two bands are fine examples of evolving without being commercialised. The Peppers evolved because they became commercialised. Being commercialised is when you are making albums to accommodate as many people's tastes as possible, to tap into the mainstream audience. You should be making music based on your tastes, not other people's. The Peppers were doing that until OHM. After that, they stopped being 'alternative' and now they are more about making money than music.
OHM is certainly not what people call mainstream. Some of those songs are definitely not radiofriendly and mainstream. Although you're absolutely right for Stadium Arcadium. Thats a bunch of commercial motives.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Yeah that's what I'm saying. OHM was their last album before they went mainstream - and their last great album. Calirfornication was where it started to go wrong.
Oh Then I agree with you, although they did go somewhat commercial for bssm, which is why Frusciante left. But SA is certainly the most mainstream album IMO
I haven't made any mistakes here my friend, you are yet to avoid making one. You say I am not a Peppers fan because I dislike three of their albums, do like their stuff from the 80s - their best stuff? Do you even have their albums from back then?
Do you have the 80s albums?? oh, sorry, then you're a great RHCP fan! nobody nows about them!
i think you WERE a Chili Peppers fan, you sure aren't now. You don't like how they've changed? then you're not a fan, YOU DON'T LIKE THE RED HOT CHILI PEPPERS, that's clear.
Yeah I have the 80s albums, and I like them very much too, they're different from the late albums, that doesn't make me hate the new albums.
So do you dislike thier style or do you dislike ethem becoming commercialised. You say you like BSSM but that was one of their biggest comercialised albums.
Who cares if their commercialised, listen to the music. Your just one of those people who hate music becuase its commercialised, its music. Im an RHCP fan who likes every single song they ever made. All of their stuff is amazing and different no matter how commercialised they get. I know this was 11 moths ago but I just hate people like you
I dislike both. The Peppers sold out and their music suffered. BSSM was a commercial success but musically, it was not a particularly commercial album, at least not in comparison to Stadium Arcadium for example.
SA is the Peppers' worst album by a country mile. It is a poorly arranged compilation of disposable pop rock songs calculated for commercial success, especially through the download market.
BSSM had soul mate. It's immediately apparent that the band cared deeply about the music it was making and were having a great time playing it.
On SA, the band sound more like the Jonas Brothers than the Chili Peppers. I thought at first that Californication and BTW were a musical experiment and creative expansion from the band, but SA was obviously all about one thing - milking teenagers of a generation that knows absolutely nothing about music.
Don't hate me out of ignorance, I'd hate to think you're yet another Peppers fanboy or John Frusciante obsessor.
But the "Im an RHCP fan who likes every single song they ever made. All of their stuff is amazing and different no matter how commercialised they get." bullshit brings serious doubts into my mind.
Sit down and try to realise what music is all about for a while, commercialisation is a bad thing as far as music is concerned.
S.A was not that bad of an album musically. It was a different style and in no way was it POP, it wasnt my favorite but musically it was really good. I am obssesed with John Frusciantes music, his solo stuff and his stuff with peppers. Listen to his solo stuff, youll be amazed. And guess what its not commercialised, he even made a free interenet album. Why cant I like all of their songs. I love the chilis. Commecialisation isnt a bad thing, its to get people to hear it. Listen to music for once.
SA is disposable, radio friendly pop rock. End of story.
I have heard several JF solo albums and used to own one (lost it somewhere). No his solo stuff is not commercial, he is playing the music for the sake of playing it, for his love of it. THAT is what music is all about, not making calculated, commercial albums for the masses. It's about self expression.
I don't just listen to music, I understand and affiliate with it.
yeh i know, i agree with you on everything but the genre, and yes i know i listenand understand music more than mainly anyone ever does, just cause somethin is commercialized doesnt mean you put soul into it.
You sure about that? Being commercialised means that the money you make from an album is worth more to you than the music on in. The Peppers are a classic example of a band selling out, and when you sell out, you are effectivey selling your soul.
Many bands have had commercial success without being commercialised. Those bands are usually amongst the most soulful - bands like REM, Pearl Jam and some classic rock bands like AC/DC and Led Zep..
I like Peral Jam, R.E.M and Led Zeppelin but I want to know how you know if a band dosent put their soul into music. Your not them, you just named bands with HUGE commercial success so how do you really know if a band is commercialised? Listen to the lyrics of By The Way, Californication, and some of the songs on BSSM: those lyrics are so deep and get to your soul. John is an amazing guitarist and flea is an amazing bassist, chad an awesome drummer. Together they make a musical masterpiece.
I love the Chilis, all of my favorite bands lyrics come from the heart. No band I like plays radio friendly pop rock. Your a hypocrite, bands you mentioned are ALWAYS on the radio. Who cares if they have commercial success. Listen to the Smashing Pumpkins, they had huge commercial success with Mellon Collie but all their stuff on that album is so deep and gets to you. Nirvana is an amazing band and they were so called "Commercialised". I listen to the music and ignore people like you.
Looks as if I'm not going to get through to you. You don't seem to understand the difference between commercial success and being commercialised.
But tell me this: why would a band like the Chili's streamline their sound, ignore the funky rhythms that defined them, stop playing older material (particularly from the less popular 80s albums) at live shows and produce slick pop rock tracks such as "Tell Me Baby"?
Dude I care about music, Im a musician myself. You know why they didnt play any funk becuase John Frusciante and Anthony Kiedis didnt want a thing to do with funk. Frusciante left the band and didnt make funk, you expect him to come back and make funk.tell me baby is a funk/alternative song, when they made the album they were listenting to funk. Look at the quote on your page and understand it . You dont care about music if you calssify it as commercialised or not. You care about the musicians
When I heard how weak SA was, I just had to figure out what had gone wrong.
Californication and BTW were not bad albums. Californication was inconsistent but had several very strong songs. BTW was more consistent as an album but only had a couple of standouts.
SA was an overwhealming dissappointment. For an album so long, you'd expect at least half the songs to be of a good standard, but it doesn't even manage this. Why? Over-commercialisation.
My fav. RHCP albums are BSSM, BTW, and Californication. We like alot of the sam music, Pearl Jam, Jane's Addiction, REM, Metallica, RHCP, Jack Irons, and Soundgarden. But you probally dont like some of the stuff I love and I probally dont like some of the stuff you love. Just becuase I like SA, dosent mean you like it. Im a musician myself and I write songs music is my life. I dont care if its commercialised becuase when I listen to it, play it and make it, Im in an alternate dimension.
What I meant by an alternate dimension is like being in a different world. You seem pretty cool, I just disagree with you about the commericilesed thing becuase you can take music to be whatever you want it to be, Im not saying your wrong what Im saying is I like music for what I hear when I listen to it not what other people tell me. Anyways you have some pretty cool videos on your channel, I couldnt find those Jack Irons songs anywhere, Im glad you put them up. His music is amazing
PJ and REM may get on the radio, but they have not gone out and streamlined their sound to make it more radio friendly.
REM have changed their sound dramatically over the years and have experimented many times with their sound, only on one album (Out of Time) did they ever sound like pop. And PJ are one of the most anti-commercial bands playing today. When grunge as a genre sold out and became mainstream, they changed their sound so they would not follow the same route.
PJ and REM may get on the radio, but they have not gone out and streamlined their sound to make it more radio friendly.
REM have changed their sound dramatically over the years and have experimented many times with their sound, only on one album (Out of Time) did they ever sound like pop. And PJ are one of the most anti-commercial bands playing today. When grunge as a genre sold out and became mainstream, they changed their sound so they would not follow the same route.
Look... an anverage live set list for the Peppers contains around 20 songs. Of those 20, they should easily be able to find a balance between '80s, '90s (INCLUDING OHM!!!) and '00s material. But they don't. They leave the vast majority of the '80s material out, and when they do play it, it only makes up a couple of the songs in the set list. Also OHM is left out completely.
This isn't about not making new material, it's about not playing older (better) material.
does it really matter that much? For them to be good they have to play older material to cater to hardcore fans? Metallica rarely plays stuff from their album ...and justice for all and are still considered a great band (st anger excluded). A band does not have to justify itself to older fans whom demand that they play material from albums that many newer fans may not like or may not know about.
It matters to me yes. You can't abandon your original audience. Metallica don't play much of Justice because it's too complex for live performances. But their earlier albums recieve a lot of play in their live performances. And although many hardcore Metallica fans hate their more recent material, at least metallica stick with metal, and play their thrash songs every show. The Peppers are no longer Alternative, they are mainstream - the opposite. And they rarely play their earlier material.
1. In my eyes, that is a show of solidarity. If john doesn't want to play OHM, the rest of them aren't exactly going to say "we don't play that because john doesn't want to".
2. John is a good enough guitar player to alter the music on MM to suit him now. And in fairness, its not mainly because of John that they don't play the UMMPP and earlier stuff. They don't play it because the mainstream audience they've attracted with Californication, BTW and SA don't like it.
which last 3 albums?? i agree OHM is challenging and Dave is a gd guitarist, but then again, only 1 song from OHM was in their GREATEST HITS album.. so what are u talkin about? BSSM sold more than 24 million copies worldwide and still counting.. and they even won Awards for songs in albums u stated as horrible.. i'm not tryin to be rude.. to each its own.. but i still get my facts rite..
The awards are meaningless here. BSSM was not a mainstream sounding album by any means. It was very popular though. Popular & minstream are not the same. Their latest albums were mainstream sounding, they lost their edge. OHM was a great album that was ALL ABOUT THE MUSIC and NOT ABOUT THE RATINGS. That is the way music should be made. Their last few albums were not made on the same principles.
The awards are meaningless here. BSSM was not a mainstream sounding album by any means. It was very popular though. Popular & minstream are not the same. Their latest albums were mainstream sounding, they lost their edge. OHM was a great album that was ALL ABOUT THE MUSIC and NOT ABOUT THE RATINGS. That is the way music should be made. Their last few albums were not made on the same principles.
i mean no disrespect.. they got a show to do.. audience changes.. then what makes u think MTV is still what it is now? i hear more nonsense playin on MTV now, then back then in the 80-90s..
That is my problem with them. They've changed to suit the tastes of a mainstream audience. And that is just plain weak. No band should do that. Peppers sold out man. That is not a good thing by any means.
That is my problem with them. They've changed to suit the tastes of a mainstream audience. And that is just plain weak. No band should do that. Peppers sold out man. That is not a good thing by any means.
OHM is amzing i remember winning a copy from a radio station was i was about 14,it was signed along with a signed band poster,in some competition but my brother stole my cd and sold it :( but i still own the poster :)
every album they make is different and u shouldnt compare em...every album has different style and spirit...personaly i dont like one hot minute as much as other albums...dave has different style thats not in the spirit of peppers i think
Keidis quoted by rolling stone on OHM in 1995:"Kiedis directs any and all detractors to the album itself: "If someone says, 'This isn't what I expected,' I would say, 'Hallelujah!' And if someone says, 'This isn't what they used to sound like,' I would say, 'Damn straight.' ........The songs we've written and the way we've played them are as exciting and hard-ass as anything we've ever played. It's just a different space. We're different people. We're growing."
has anyone noticed that while dave was playing in the pepps, flea's wild bass licks were somewhat restricted, it's as if dave's style blocked his creativity, john and flea make a good pair, but i have to admit that dave's style is freakin' awesome, unique.
yeah definetly but flea never got back to the way he was before one hot minute, calfiforniacation has little unique bass lines and by the way has even less, stadium arcadium tho does have some funky bass in it tho
theres a reason for that, his idea on bass has changed, he tries to make it more melodic, more fitting with the style of the album. He wanted his bass lines to be more funk and the notes to ring out, to add to the song.
yeah at first he was into punk/funk and making those funky bass lines that used like all the neck but as he moved on he got more experimental and making them melodic
I look at each album as an individual piece of music. I don't compare it with past albums. With that being said, I enjoyed OHM more than any other RHCP album. This is the first major performance of Warped, all the lyrics are different though. But the rhythm of Dave and Flea is psychedelic, beautiful, and intense at the same time.
ttwerner: one hot minute best album ever??? really??? not for my style and I think not for the really RHCP style. I like some songs from this album but not as much as from Blood Sugar or Californication
Love that outro and how mixed in Alittle 3days from James addiction nicely done!
myownruin187 2 months ago
For some reason, I never like live performances of this song.
NickODU2015 5 months ago
Anthony, too bad the rockstar didn't like wearing the light bulb, hey?
At least you guys didn't look like fuckwits on this song...
RickySwindle 8 months ago
The reason why the lyrics are different is due to the fact that the album/song hadn't been recorded yet. One Hot Minute came out a year after thisi performance. Even the title of the song on most if not all bootlegs was called She Said. Aeroplane was similar with some different lyrics and the title Music Is My Aeroplane. Pea was listed as I'm A Little Pea.
JEH78 10 months ago
Outro is amazing
thekeenanp 1 year ago
They better play this album live again. It's too damn good to forget. I wanna hear Kiedis sing this song again! It'd be really interesting
jwild611 1 year ago
Kiedis is singing the wrong lyrics
98Waffles 1 year ago
@98Waffles by the time they played this concert, one hot minute was still in production... so lyrics wasn't ready yet... typical from them to unveil songs after a long hiatus...
darkhun73r 1 year ago
no intro lyrics
k0stil 1 year ago
fuck my generation i wish i was a 90s teenager
JBoothy94 1 year ago 2
@JBoothy94 na man we got justin bieber
mrdpscow 1 year ago 5
@JBoothy94 Ahahahah, I was a teenager in the 90s and I wanted so bad to be in the 70s, they weren't that funny the 90s, remember we didn't still have the web and information came mostly from TV. It was a hell, notice that the music that has still value today from those times is all pretty sad. Enjoy your youth my friend, smash your tv.
mekanikdestruktiw 1 year ago
possbly 3rd best band at woodstock 94,
metalica and nine inch nails rule
royalnash 1 year ago
This song is The Chili's at their hardest, most psychadelic and certaintly their most progressive...and yet a lot of people out there who call themselves fans probably have never even heard it.
jwild611 2 years ago 6
always thought chads drumming on this track was wicked
zofodraziweht 2 years ago 2
the lyrics in this video are so fucking out there mind blowing gotta fucking love how anthony just went out there and improvised the entire song
3waystopcock 2 years ago 2
well frusciante has left again so im sure the door is open for a couple of number of OHM to come back into the set! hey navarro might even rejoin haha!
joshmacky 2 years ago 3
Yeah wouldn't that be cool to see Navarro make his triumphant return. OHM is fucking amazing too.
Jake623314 2 years ago 4
itd be very cool
darkpanzito 2 years ago
@joshmacky lol one of johns friends, josh klinghoffer joined rhcp when he left. i was hoping dave would rejoin but unfortunately he didn't.
nick20200 1 year ago
made me wonder wore people like saying is this a new song because one hot minute didn't came out until 1995.
Fatzombie1980 2 years ago
I disagree that ''one hot minute'' is their best album, in my opinion its bssm but i think its a shame for Frusciante not to play not even one track from this album.. after all, he decided to leave the band at 1992 so the band had to go on.. its like erasing 6 or something years of the group's history. and,ok, tracks like ''one hot minute',warped,one big mob or 'deep kick' are out of his style but i think for example he could easily play ''walkabouts' or other ''lighter'' tracks..
bcoolicious 2 years ago
frusciante is just jaleous of "one hot minute", this album is deep as he can't make it one like it.
caligula666666 2 years ago 5
frusciante is better than navarro easy to tell
colpetne 2 years ago
@caligula666666
actually they don`t play this album`s songs cuz also kiedis doesn`t like it.
John heard only "warped" and "my friends" on radio.
he didn`t listene to the album.
he said that it`s the same as watching a video where your girlfriend is fuckin with another guy
k0stil 1 year ago
I agree, I mean, it's be great to see them play "My Friends" again. Or "Transcending" that was an amazing song.
masterfulmuffin 2 years ago
So John really refused to play songs from "One Hot Minute?" What a shame, many standout songs. "Coffee Shop..." the great thing about the band is that its inherent soul transcends its components (other than Flea/Kiedis).
mikeadk 2 years ago
OHM: An unbelievable collaboration. Wish they would play something off this album live again. Frusciante must be a sensative dude.
pa5232 2 years ago 6
this is one of my favorite songs from the chili peppers
MasterofMetallica08 2 years ago 4
One hot minute is the best chili peppers album by far
Lepage900 2 years ago 20
Quote. Finally someone who got it.
CagliostroInHelvete 2 years ago 3
@Lepage900 bullshit
Jonidiboni 1 year ago
@Lepage900 mmmm no
raw2is2jose 1 year ago
@Lepage900 thats your opinion, millions disagree !
888comms 11 months ago 2
u guys arent real chili fans if u dislike ohm or think its one of their worst albums, just so u no..
3waystopcock 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
no way man i didnt like ohm i consider it ther worst album but i consider myself to be a huge chili pepers fan iv red anthonys auto biography 5 times i can sing along to any song and i can play 8 songs by them on my strat so just so u know FUCK YOU KEEP UR OPINION OF ME NOT BEING A REAL CHILI PEPPER FAN TO UR OWN FUCKIN SELF
thegreats12 2 years ago
my fucking battery was shot. to far to go back.
jimmynorton1001 2 years ago
they jam better with john, those were pretty standard jams. Something about frusciante just makes the chili peppers the chili peppers, better chemistry. Something about dave in that band just wasnt right
tristan9981 2 years ago
He was makeing it up as they were going along.
GILakaGP3 2 years ago
damn great performance
Jimcaste 2 years ago
i'll give it to navarro, he had huge shoes to fill during the time JF was gone and he stepped up great, he's an awesome player and jane's addiction rocks, however it was just different. Not a bad thing but it was just a different sound coming from dave. Rock on RHCP!!!
mcdaniels142 2 years ago 3
I was at this show and didn't realize till now they played this song, it was before they released One Hot Minute, I love that CD.
phlighty 2 years ago 3
One Hot Minute is the best album ever.
beve12 3 years ago 7
incorrect
bensley56 2 years ago
Navarro deserves more respect is what i think. You guys seen his interview with dave mustaine?
rand1313 3 years ago 24
i cant stop listning to this albumand the bsides
its so beautifully structured....ever song has got layers of guitar riffs and chords supported by the infinite abilities of flea on bass and without a doubt the best drumming ive heard by chad (listen to intro of walkabout
all the lyrics are from the fucken heart by anthony....singing about his tendency to submit to addicition, the death of river and kurt... melodies are fucken strong...there was no john to come up with the tearjerker melody
dontbro 3 years ago 2
Why dont you all stop your debates (Debating over Youtube?!) and listen to the music.
Jelle528 3 years ago 3
i disagree but okay.
3waystopcock 3 years ago
omg this song is before they had the record thats why it sounds a bit wierd
vizcacha5 3 years ago 3
wow, gargantuan sock, u really have no life do u. who cares what they do play or not, jus enjoy it, dun needa be writing and responding on every single page. my god u needa get a girlfriend
unconditionallykool 3 years ago 3
me da escalofrios esta cancion.. me llega muy adentro, lo unico que le falto a esta version es que anthony gritara mas cuando canta.. tengo 16 años yo, y no se si soy realmente o no un fan.. pero me encantan tanto los viejos como los nuevos cds.. y todavia no tuve la posibilidad de verlos, soy de argentina, pero espero algun dia poder verlos. Sueño con estar en un recital como el de kawasaki en 1990, que recital por dios.. la limaban.
RED HOT CHILI PEPPERS!!!!!!!!
jujoman10 3 years ago 3
it's the Warped with the original lyrics, when it's name was She Said. I have red about it, it was a song of a love story, but they changed it.
MisunderstoodAsRebel 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dont take that wrong I m erally a chillifan,but anthony looks gay with that long hair!
sucker1991 3 years ago
OHM is underrated..den again californication is the culmination of the public to give recognition to the repute of RHCP..it's like the time has come for RHCP to be Grammied
periloushomous 3 years ago
one hot minute is awesome, it was really different and really good, techincally seems quite challenging also, i love it!
nikkidlinskux 3 years ago
a BOSS DD-3 or 2 Delay i think
EMPower08 4 years ago
is dave using a reverb pedal or a delay?
utyo 4 years ago
frusciante > navarro
ollie1504 4 years ago 2
lol true
hoodednood 4 years ago
I loved the peppers right up to this record (one hot minute) - after thats its been all downhill, well ok californication had it moments.
HaddaWayMcHammer 4 years ago 3
Yay! Someone finally speaks the truth...
Pretty much the same feeling here dude, By the way & stadium arcadium contains some of the worst radio-friendly, nursery-rhyme nonsense committed to record..
What happened..?
Destructopodx 4 years ago 2
Whatever it was, it was a disaster. Peppers are so mainstream now it makes me sick.
Is it a coincidence that the Peppers only went shit after John came back? He refused to play any OHM and much of the pre BSSM material. I can't help but think he had something to do with it.
Then again, it could all be down to money.
In any case, OHM was their last great album, and they seem to have lost the magic.
TheGargantuanSock 4 years ago
1. the Chili peppers unanimously don't like one hot minute not just john.
2. John doesn't play Mothers milk meterial that much as he doesn't like the guitar in it. (due much distortion) as for Red hot chili peppers to the upity lift mofo plan I do not know, possibly out of respect for Hillel.
Fureak 4 years ago
1. In my eyes, that is a show of solidarity. If john doesn't want to play OHM, the rest of them aren't exactly going to say "we don't play that because john doesn't want to".
2. John is a good enough guitar player to alter the music on MM to suit him now. And in fairness, its not mainly because of John that they don't play the UMMPP and earlier stuff. They don't play it because the mainstream audience they've attracted with Californication, BTW and SA don't like it.
Payno4 4 years ago
WTF???
TheGargantuanSock 4 years ago
1. not nessecarily as to them One Hot Minute is a dark time in the peppers line up. half their members were on drugs (anthony kiedis being the biggest example)heavily.
2. they played catholic school girls rule live in 07.
Fureak 4 years ago
They were all on drugs in the 80s! When Hillel died was that not a dark moment for the band? Yet the 80s and early 90s was when they were at their best. They don't play much of that either.
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
And please, playing SGR is not enough. What about True Men Don't Kill Coyotes? American Ghost Dance? No Chump Love Sucker? All those great early songs recieve little or no attention these days. And that's a crying shame. The earlier material and OHM needs to be played live frequently if the peppers are to retain their soul.
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
and what about guns n roses..? they kept tourin and didnt produce any records back then.. they still play on and on their earlier releases (Appetite for Destruction).. so what i know, the fans were impatient and wants new songs/materials.. new record (Use Your Illusion)to be released.. u see, its hard in music business as u want audience to be happy.. they have to change but not completely.. but whatever it is RHCP still has the energy and sell records by the millions.. enough said..
chixlil83 3 years ago
Look... an anverage live set list for the Peppers contains around 20 songs. Of those 20, they should easily be able to find a balance between '80s, '90s (INCLUDING OHM!!!) and '00s material. But they don't. They leave the vast majority of the '80s material out, and when they do play it, it only makes up a couple of the songs in the set list. Also OHM is left out completely.
This isn't about not making new material, it's about not playing older (better) material.
PayneQPR 3 years ago
oh shut up
they don't play OHM songs because of john.
you're not a better fan just cause you like their old stuff more than the new stuff
you should be able to understand the change in their music, the evolution
tomaspianovi 3 years ago
Man you haven't got a clue. "they don't play OHM songs because of John" - That's one of my biggest criticisms of him. John is a total prick, you don't leave out an entire album because one member doesn't like it.
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
...and where did I say that it makes you a better fan to like the old stuff more? Don't put words in my mouth because you're too cretinous to understand what I'm saying. The fact their music has evolved doesn't bother me - that's a natural progression. The fact that their music has become mainstream and commercialised is what bothers me. The whole point in the Peppers was that they did what they wanted no matter what, they were alternative and didn't conform to trends in music, they set them.
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
Now they have gone against that, their last three albums have been radio friendly trash. Everything they did before was superb. They are no longer the exciting 'out there' band they were before, they have become a dull, commercialised band who are a shell of their former selves.
Now this time sit back and think a little before you post.
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
hey, r u mad with people for liking their music?
r u mad with radio-stations for playing their songs cause they think it's good music?
yeah, you're right. They should just give their albums to fans like you and not to radios, so their music doesn't become too popular. Or better, they shouldn't even take out new records. So they could just don't earn any more money and die from hunger :)
I think you still DON'T understand that their music has evolved
tomaspianovi 3 years ago
My God you are an idiot. It's not that they let their music be played on the radio! It's that they altered the style of their music to suit more people, therefore it's more about the money than it is about the music. That's what being commercialised is.
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
their music has evolved! and more people liked their new music, maybe because they didn't even knew the old stuff, and then discovered it!
tomaspianovi 3 years ago
u r 18, right? then, r u going to tell me that you knew the peppers before releasing Californication? this Cd was released when you were f*cking 8 man, so I'm sure you knew them (and liked them) after they became the "commercialized" and "mainstream" band you hate so much now. then you discovered the old stuff, and now you hate all the fans that don't think their old stuff is better than the new one, s*cker
tomaspianovi 3 years ago
That is where you are hopelessly wrong. I heard the Peppers for the first time just after they released By The Way. I thought they were OK but would never have bought that album. Then someone played me their Greatest Hits album. You know what my favourite song was? Higher Ground, why? Because it had something special about it, it stood out. The first Peppers album I bought was Mother's Milk. And where did I say I hate the fans who prefer their new stuff? Still putting words in my mouth I see...
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
I'm sure that what a band like the Chili Peppers wants is not a wide public from all around the world like they have now. They sure would like people not to like their music. And would like YOU to be their only fan, a fan that won't like any development or experimentation in their music.
(that was sarcasm, please understand)
tomaspianovi 3 years ago
oh, in your channel you made a mistake: you put the Red Hot Chili Peppers in the music you like, aren't they too commercialized? I think u can't like a band if you hate three complete albums of them.
And I noted you like AC/DC. How could you understand the evolution in music, if you like a band that's been releasing the same album over and over?
tomaspianovi 3 years ago
I'm not a fan of the recent Peppers, but am a huge fan of the older Peppers, which is what they are all about. So I am a huge Peppers fan.
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
"which is what they are all about"?
and I'm the one who's got think and then write?
tomaspianovi 3 years ago
And look at some of the other bands I like: Pearl Jam & REM. REM have evolved far far more than the Peppers yet have not become commercialised (only really mainstream album was Out of Time, and that is shit). Pearl Jam have evolved too, and have DELIBERATELY broken AWAY from the mainstream and are ANTI-COMMERCIALISATION.
I told you to think before you post, it's obvious you didn't.
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
please define commercialization and mainstream cause you've got a puzzle in your head, man, u don't even know what the f*ck you're talking about.
No offense, but I don't give a f*ck about what REM and pearl jam did to themselves.
I tell you, the object of a band is for more people to like their music, and the only way to do that is to sell your albums, give you're songs to the radios, take out singles, creating new music (different, ask AC/DC), if you think that's being commercial youre wrong
tomaspianovi 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Those two bands are fine examples of evolving without being commercialised. The Peppers evolved because they became commercialised. Being commercialised is when you are making albums to accommodate as many people's tastes as possible, to tap into the mainstream audience. You should be making music based on your tastes, not other people's. The Peppers were doing that until OHM. After that, they stopped being 'alternative' and now they are more about making money than music.
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
how can u tell that? how can u tell that their music changed just to fit more audience? can't their tastes have changed?
you should play music for almost 25 years to understand what their evolution has been
tomaspianovi 3 years ago 2
OHM is certainly not what people call mainstream. Some of those songs are definitely not radiofriendly and mainstream. Although you're absolutely right for Stadium Arcadium. Thats a bunch of commercial motives.
Hoodednood2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yeah that's what I'm saying. OHM was their last album before they went mainstream - and their last great album. Calirfornication was where it started to go wrong.
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
Oh Then I agree with you, although they did go somewhat commercial for bssm, which is why Frusciante left. But SA is certainly the most mainstream album IMO
Hoodednood2 3 years ago
mainstream =/= bad
yeti60 3 years ago
Yeah you're right... like Shallow Be Thy Game = reaaally anti-religion
yeti60 3 years ago 3
I haven't made any mistakes here my friend, you are yet to avoid making one. You say I am not a Peppers fan because I dislike three of their albums, do like their stuff from the 80s - their best stuff? Do you even have their albums from back then?
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
Do you have the 80s albums?? oh, sorry, then you're a great RHCP fan! nobody nows about them!
i think you WERE a Chili Peppers fan, you sure aren't now. You don't like how they've changed? then you're not a fan, YOU DON'T LIKE THE RED HOT CHILI PEPPERS, that's clear.
Yeah I have the 80s albums, and I like them very much too, they're different from the late albums, that doesn't make me hate the new albums.
tomaspianovi 3 years ago
But MUSICALLY speaking, do you really think tUMPP is better than SA or By the way? Then you don't f*cking know anything about harmony in music.
tomaspianovi 3 years ago
So do you dislike thier style or do you dislike ethem becoming commercialised. You say you like BSSM but that was one of their biggest comercialised albums.
Who cares if their commercialised, listen to the music. Your just one of those people who hate music becuase its commercialised, its music. Im an RHCP fan who likes every single song they ever made. All of their stuff is amazing and different no matter how commercialised they get. I know this was 11 moths ago but I just hate people like you
VaultMusic105 2 years ago
Christ I'd forgotten about all this...
I dislike both. The Peppers sold out and their music suffered. BSSM was a commercial success but musically, it was not a particularly commercial album, at least not in comparison to Stadium Arcadium for example.
SA is the Peppers' worst album by a country mile. It is a poorly arranged compilation of disposable pop rock songs calculated for commercial success, especially through the download market.
Peppers sold out, music got shit.
TheGargantuanSock 2 years ago
BSSM had soul mate. It's immediately apparent that the band cared deeply about the music it was making and were having a great time playing it.
On SA, the band sound more like the Jonas Brothers than the Chili Peppers. I thought at first that Californication and BTW were a musical experiment and creative expansion from the band, but SA was obviously all about one thing - milking teenagers of a generation that knows absolutely nothing about music.
Peppers stopped being the Peppers in 1999.
TheGargantuanSock 2 years ago
Don't hate me out of ignorance, I'd hate to think you're yet another Peppers fanboy or John Frusciante obsessor.
But the "Im an RHCP fan who likes every single song they ever made. All of their stuff is amazing and different no matter how commercialised they get." bullshit brings serious doubts into my mind.
Sit down and try to realise what music is all about for a while, commercialisation is a bad thing as far as music is concerned.
TheGargantuanSock 2 years ago
S.A was not that bad of an album musically. It was a different style and in no way was it POP, it wasnt my favorite but musically it was really good. I am obssesed with John Frusciantes music, his solo stuff and his stuff with peppers. Listen to his solo stuff, youll be amazed. And guess what its not commercialised, he even made a free interenet album. Why cant I like all of their songs. I love the chilis. Commecialisation isnt a bad thing, its to get people to hear it. Listen to music for once.
VaultMusic105 2 years ago
SA is disposable, radio friendly pop rock. End of story.
I have heard several JF solo albums and used to own one (lost it somewhere). No his solo stuff is not commercial, he is playing the music for the sake of playing it, for his love of it. THAT is what music is all about, not making calculated, commercial albums for the masses. It's about self expression.
I don't just listen to music, I understand and affiliate with it.
TheGargantuanSock 2 years ago
yeh i know, i agree with you on everything but the genre, and yes i know i listenand understand music more than mainly anyone ever does, just cause somethin is commercialized doesnt mean you put soul into it.
VaultMusic105 2 years ago
*doesnt mean you *don't* put soul into it sorry.
VaultMusic105 2 years ago
You sure about that? Being commercialised means that the money you make from an album is worth more to you than the music on in. The Peppers are a classic example of a band selling out, and when you sell out, you are effectivey selling your soul.
Many bands have had commercial success without being commercialised. Those bands are usually amongst the most soulful - bands like REM, Pearl Jam and some classic rock bands like AC/DC and Led Zep..
TheGargantuanSock 2 years ago
I like Peral Jam, R.E.M and Led Zeppelin but I want to know how you know if a band dosent put their soul into music. Your not them, you just named bands with HUGE commercial success so how do you really know if a band is commercialised? Listen to the lyrics of By The Way, Californication, and some of the songs on BSSM: those lyrics are so deep and get to your soul. John is an amazing guitarist and flea is an amazing bassist, chad an awesome drummer. Together they make a musical masterpiece.
VaultMusic105 2 years ago
I love the Chilis, all of my favorite bands lyrics come from the heart. No band I like plays radio friendly pop rock. Your a hypocrite, bands you mentioned are ALWAYS on the radio. Who cares if they have commercial success. Listen to the Smashing Pumpkins, they had huge commercial success with Mellon Collie but all their stuff on that album is so deep and gets to you. Nirvana is an amazing band and they were so called "Commercialised". I listen to the music and ignore people like you.
VaultMusic105 2 years ago
Looks as if I'm not going to get through to you. You don't seem to understand the difference between commercial success and being commercialised.
But tell me this: why would a band like the Chili's streamline their sound, ignore the funky rhythms that defined them, stop playing older material (particularly from the less popular 80s albums) at live shows and produce slick pop rock tracks such as "Tell Me Baby"?
TheGargantuanSock 2 years ago
Dude I care about music, Im a musician myself. You know why they didnt play any funk becuase John Frusciante and Anthony Kiedis didnt want a thing to do with funk. Frusciante left the band and didnt make funk, you expect him to come back and make funk.tell me baby is a funk/alternative song, when they made the album they were listenting to funk. Look at the quote on your page and understand it . You dont care about music if you calssify it as commercialised or not. You care about the musicians
VaultMusic105 2 years ago
I listen to the music first and foremost.
When I heard how weak SA was, I just had to figure out what had gone wrong.
Californication and BTW were not bad albums. Californication was inconsistent but had several very strong songs. BTW was more consistent as an album but only had a couple of standouts.
SA was an overwhealming dissappointment. For an album so long, you'd expect at least half the songs to be of a good standard, but it doesn't even manage this. Why? Over-commercialisation.
TheGargantuanSock 2 years ago
My fav. RHCP albums are BSSM, BTW, and Californication. We like alot of the sam music, Pearl Jam, Jane's Addiction, REM, Metallica, RHCP, Jack Irons, and Soundgarden. But you probally dont like some of the stuff I love and I probally dont like some of the stuff you love. Just becuase I like SA, dosent mean you like it. Im a musician myself and I write songs music is my life. I dont care if its commercialised becuase when I listen to it, play it and make it, Im in an alternate dimension.
VaultMusic105 2 years ago
What I meant by an alternate dimension is like being in a different world. You seem pretty cool, I just disagree with you about the commericilesed thing becuase you can take music to be whatever you want it to be, Im not saying your wrong what Im saying is I like music for what I hear when I listen to it not what other people tell me. Anyways you have some pretty cool videos on your channel, I couldnt find those Jack Irons songs anywhere, Im glad you put them up. His music is amazing
VaultMusic105 2 years ago
They changed their sound to one that would make more money, and appeal to the mass audience. The music suffered as a result.
That is not something that bands who really care about their music do.
If you really gave a shit about music, you'd agree with me. As it stands, you just look like a fanboy.
TheGargantuanSock 2 years ago
PJ and REM may get on the radio, but they have not gone out and streamlined their sound to make it more radio friendly.
REM have changed their sound dramatically over the years and have experimented many times with their sound, only on one album (Out of Time) did they ever sound like pop. And PJ are one of the most anti-commercial bands playing today. When grunge as a genre sold out and became mainstream, they changed their sound so they would not follow the same route.
I'm no hypocrite.
TheGargantuanSock 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PJ and REM may get on the radio, but they have not gone out and streamlined their sound to make it more radio friendly.
REM have changed their sound dramatically over the years and have experimented many times with their sound, only on one album (Out of Time) did they ever sound like pop. And PJ are one of the most anti-commercial bands playing today. When grunge as a genre sold out and became mainstream, they changed their sound so they would not follow the same route.
I'm no hypocrite
TheGargantuanSock 2 years ago
There's a difference between a successful album and a commercialised / mainstream album. BSSM was a successful album, SA was commercialised.
This isn't about morals, I couldn't give a shit about morals; it's about good music, and good music comes from the heart.
The sooner you understand that the better.
TheGargantuanSock 2 years ago
Look... an anverage live set list for the Peppers contains around 20 songs. Of those 20, they should easily be able to find a balance between '80s, '90s (INCLUDING OHM!!!) and '00s material. But they don't. They leave the vast majority of the '80s material out, and when they do play it, it only makes up a couple of the songs in the set list. Also OHM is left out completely.
This isn't about not making new material, it's about not playing older (better) material.
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
does it really matter that much? For them to be good they have to play older material to cater to hardcore fans? Metallica rarely plays stuff from their album ...and justice for all and are still considered a great band (st anger excluded). A band does not have to justify itself to older fans whom demand that they play material from albums that many newer fans may not like or may not know about.
Fureak 3 years ago 2
It matters to me yes. You can't abandon your original audience. Metallica don't play much of Justice because it's too complex for live performances. But their earlier albums recieve a lot of play in their live performances. And although many hardcore Metallica fans hate their more recent material, at least metallica stick with metal, and play their thrash songs every show. The Peppers are no longer Alternative, they are mainstream - the opposite. And they rarely play their earlier material.
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
go check yourself
tomaspianovi 3 years ago
1. In my eyes, that is a show of solidarity. If john doesn't want to play OHM, the rest of them aren't exactly going to say "we don't play that because john doesn't want to".
2. John is a good enough guitar player to alter the music on MM to suit him now. And in fairness, its not mainly because of John that they don't play the UMMPP and earlier stuff. They don't play it because the mainstream audience they've attracted with Californication, BTW and SA don't like it.
TheGargantuanSock 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I agree with you.
Their last 3 albums are horrible. OHM was challenging, though it doesn't work on every song. It was their last good album.
Reint25 3 years ago
which last 3 albums?? i agree OHM is challenging and Dave is a gd guitarist, but then again, only 1 song from OHM was in their GREATEST HITS album.. so what are u talkin about? BSSM sold more than 24 million copies worldwide and still counting.. and they even won Awards for songs in albums u stated as horrible.. i'm not tryin to be rude.. to each its own.. but i still get my facts rite..
chixlil83 3 years ago
The awards are meaningless here. BSSM was not a mainstream sounding album by any means. It was very popular though. Popular & minstream are not the same. Their latest albums were mainstream sounding, they lost their edge. OHM was a great album that was ALL ABOUT THE MUSIC and NOT ABOUT THE RATINGS. That is the way music should be made. Their last few albums were not made on the same principles.
PayneQPR 3 years ago
The awards are meaningless here. BSSM was not a mainstream sounding album by any means. It was very popular though. Popular & minstream are not the same. Their latest albums were mainstream sounding, they lost their edge. OHM was a great album that was ALL ABOUT THE MUSIC and NOT ABOUT THE RATINGS. That is the way music should be made. Their last few albums were not made on the same principles.
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
i mean no disrespect.. they got a show to do.. audience changes.. then what makes u think MTV is still what it is now? i hear more nonsense playin on MTV now, then back then in the 80-90s..
chixlil83 3 years ago
That is my problem with them. They've changed to suit the tastes of a mainstream audience. And that is just plain weak. No band should do that. Peppers sold out man. That is not a good thing by any means.
PayneQPR 3 years ago
That is my problem with them. They've changed to suit the tastes of a mainstream audience. And that is just plain weak. No band should do that. Peppers sold out man. That is not a good thing by any means.
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
Sorry about the profile overlap there.
Hate when that happens.
TheGargantuanSock 3 years ago
ey sucker1991 you are a gay for post this comment SUCK MY... PENIS!!! SON OF BITCH
FROM ARGENTINA
RHCP_MAXI
videoclip4 3 years ago
OHM is amzing i remember winning a copy from a radio station was i was about 14,it was signed along with a signed band poster,in some competition but my brother stole my cd and sold it :( but i still own the poster :)
landshark25 4 years ago
haha fleas voice broke majorly
and if any1s wondering about the lightbulb thing its because they dresed him up with his head inside a huge lightbulb :P
Pendulum4444 4 years ago
i love 1.18-1.28
ManitouPL 4 years ago
every album they make is different and u shouldnt compare em...every album has different style and spirit...personaly i dont like one hot minute as much as other albums...dave has different style thats not in the spirit of peppers i think
aloljudi 4 years ago 3
Keidis quoted by rolling stone on OHM in 1995:"Kiedis directs any and all detractors to the album itself: "If someone says, 'This isn't what I expected,' I would say, 'Hallelujah!' And if someone says, 'This isn't what they used to sound like,' I would say, 'Damn straight.' ........The songs we've written and the way we've played them are as exciting and hard-ass as anything we've ever played. It's just a different space. We're different people. We're growing."
warpedoctave 4 years ago 2
has anyone noticed that while dave was playing in the pepps, flea's wild bass licks were somewhat restricted, it's as if dave's style blocked his creativity, john and flea make a good pair, but i have to admit that dave's style is freakin' awesome, unique.
chateauxDEbrat 4 years ago 2
yeah definetly but flea never got back to the way he was before one hot minute, calfiforniacation has little unique bass lines and by the way has even less, stadium arcadium tho does have some funky bass in it tho
socom2293 4 years ago
theres a reason for that, his idea on bass has changed, he tries to make it more melodic, more fitting with the style of the album. He wanted his bass lines to be more funk and the notes to ring out, to add to the song.
torentokakashi 4 years ago
u could say that
socom2293 4 years ago
yeah at first he was into punk/funk and making those funky bass lines that used like all the neck but as he moved on he got more experimental and making them melodic
Pendulum4444 4 years ago
i jsut cant get enough of the guitaring ...:O its orgasmic
wackojackman 4 years ago
I look at each album as an individual piece of music. I don't compare it with past albums. With that being said, I enjoyed OHM more than any other RHCP album. This is the first major performance of Warped, all the lyrics are different though. But the rhythm of Dave and Flea is psychedelic, beautiful, and intense at the same time.
paralleluniverse1988 4 years ago
dave navarro is great, but he fucked himself after leaving the peppers
turrazoo 4 years ago
He got fired, lol.
Smurfhat 4 years ago
ttwerner: one hot minute best album ever??? really??? not for my style and I think not for the really RHCP style. I like some songs from this album but not as much as from Blood Sugar or Californication
pupakos 4 years ago
love this song, it's so beautiful and psychodelic..
Fritzzz7 4 years ago 2
yeah...anthony don't know the lyrics....
thaedda 4 years ago
I've heard these different lyrics in a few bootleg recordings pre-1995. I think this is an "prototype" of Warped.
blinddog83 3 years ago
i also heard some bootlegs from 94..and he is singing there not the lyrics he is singing on the album...maybe a "prototype"...yes
thaedda 3 years ago
Dave Navarro rules!!! one hot minute best album ever!!
ttwerner 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
shut up
andrewbohner 4 years ago
woah whats wrong with having an opinion
ahhthelightx 4 years ago
I've certainly listened to OHM much more than the three albums that have followed.
sixtyeightspecial 4 years ago 3
awesome, great!!!
LaGulaDelNorte 4 years ago
dave looks odd with his hair short
cm524 4 years ago