@Nawor666 So whites never even elected a minority even though for many years this country was 40 percent black (before southerners opened the floodgates to Europe) but its Blacks who are Brainwashed? Why the Hell would ANYONE vote for a republican post Bush? You whites will soon be a minority in America so it would behoove you to stop attacking minorities with these false accusations or move back to Europe.
@Nawor666 So whites never even elected a minority even though for many years this country was 40 percent black (before southerners opened the floodgates to Europe) but its Blacks who are Brainwashed? Why the Hell would ANYONE vote for a republican post Bush? You whites will soon be a minority in America so it would behoove you to stop attacking minorities with these false accusations or move back to Europe.
@JUDALATION post continued...If you were a Black man who worked his way through school and collage and then made a lot of money starting your own business yet vote exactly the same way as another Black man who didn't even show any interest in going to school and is on the public dime, then at least one of the two men is the fool. Personal interests should be different enough in the Black community for them to not be voting 95% one way, and racism arguments are not cover for it either
@CyberSpaceman81 What other Group were slaves just a century ago? What other group has as much poverty? You are ignoring the reality that Blacks wont vote for the conservatives who are very racist to this day! Why the hell would any black person vote republican? name 4 reasons that dont have any racist steriotypes attached... If you think its bad now just wait till minorities take over the south... this will be a democratic century, Your party is dead on arival chump!
@JUDALATION This country has had racism for countless groups. Even supposed "free" immigrant groups had to fight just to get slave labor paying jobs when signs Like "No Irish need Apply" were in vogue. They would come over fresh of the boat and have to fight for the union and the emancipation of people whose free Black brethren were even chosen over them for jobs. Yet the majority did fight for the union and worked to get in to posts of community status to gain more acceptance.
@JUDALATION The notion of "color" was a scapegoat used for Black enslavement, Nazis called Jews "Vermin" as a scapegoat, and African tribes took slaves of their neighbors even before the slave trade and used "Tribal" difference. The modern "Civil Rights" movement doesn't see racism and slavery as a universal human trait of using scapegoats, they have instead focused on the same identity politics of their enslaver and alienated other groups by viewing things from notions "White" guilt
@JUDALATION By Identifying by the same scapegoat as those who enslaved here, African Americans have created a culture that doesn't view the past slavery of other Ethnic european "White" poeple by european white slaveholders in Europe or Native Africans by native Africans in the same light as their enslavement here, they instead view their slavery as separate by a supposed REALITY of "color" and not as kindred HUMAN failing. That is where the notion of perpetual race guilt comes from
@JUDALATION You may try and say conservatives are racists, yet the mass of Liberals of identity politics don't identify their slavery hardships with the hardships and slavery of other people of differing skin color, and the advantage politics of Liberal Minorities is in contrast to groups like the Irish who were treated with racism who had no allowed podium then and had to work into accepted full assimilation. The tenor of minority politics is to keep apart and keep advantages.
@JUDALATION YOU are clearly a racist as EVERYTHING for you is about race. You sight not a shred of evidence. You really are a laughably unread logical fallacy spouting cognitive dissonant lying phony twerp. YOU are a left liberal. You're blocked too, so I won't see you unsourced race baiting junk. Toodle ooh.
@JUDALATION "racist! racist! racist!" The first card and only argument of the left liberal racist. Everyone, everything and anything is "racist!" Reason 1. The pro slavery Democrats created the KKK & enforced Jim Crow & Segregation up until the 60's with Democrats like Sen Byrd fillibustering to stop civil rights legislation. Reason 2. The bottom ten cities & states with the most black poverty have been Democrat governed for over 46 to over 100 years.
@JUDALATION REASON 3. Racist eugenicist Marxist drug addict, group sex fan & KKK speaker Margaret Sanger, was admired by Hitler who used her ideas. Sanger said that she wanted 2 "exterminate the negro race", She got close 2 that goal by creating Planned Parenthood. Always concentrated in black & ethnic minority areas. PP has killed over 13 million black babies since 1973, making millions of dollars. THAT'S RACISM. PP is a massive Obama supporter & BO loves PP. margaretsanger blogspot com
@JUDALATION Reason 4. Easily Utube found docos 'MAAFA21 Black Genocide', 'Racism In The Democrat Party' & 'Emancipation Revolation Revolution' or via errvideo com. & PJTV com's Alphonso Rachel, Sonja Schmidt, Bill Whittle, Andrew Klavan, Mr Hicks etc. Left Dems on photo parade at zombietime com, lookingattheleft com, ringospictures com, thepeoplescube com, commieblaster com, jihadwatch org, atlasshrug2000 typepad com, braitbart com, michelllemalkin com steynonlline com
@JUDALATION So I guess that the racist pro Segregation, pro Jim Crow creating & enforcing Dixie Democrats of George Wallace, Bull Connor, Orval Faubus & Grand Kleagle Democrat House Speaker Sen Byrd, were the uh, "liberals of their day" then. U don't appear 2 read, R clearly a natural born glib liar & more logical fallacy prone than..well, U R a left liberal. Carry on..Er, the Democrats created the KKK, Jim Crow AND Segregation. They mob attacked the first BLACK CONGRESSMEN out of Congress..
@JUDALATION You really are dense, Black people are the only group in this nation who votes as high as 95% for only one party You can pretend that that is because one parties is supposedly just an oh so "racist" party and Black people should vote 95% the other way. Yet even in the Black community their are people of lesser and greater means and difffering values.... to be continued in next post.
This years C-PAC told the Gay republicans to stay away, while opening their arms to The WHITE SUPREMICIST GROUPS! This is after they attacked blacks as brainwashed for voting for the first Black president at 90%, Never mind whites have done it at 100% in every previous election. Conservatism is a mental disorder, making them incapible of looking at facts. EVERY shooter that blows up an abortion clinic is conservative!
This rings so true, I have Liberals attacking me all the time when I voice an opinion that's anything but P.C. I'm supposed to tolerate them but they won't give me the same consideration. You can have an opinion only if it's liberal and P.C.
@TRUMPHMAN Same here, on Youtube I received the most hatred from leftist liberals and democrats. If you say something they do not agree with, you're automatically a moron, worthless etc. Often I get such remarks from people who can't even spell right. Clearly left wing ideologies tend to be intolerant and hateful.
I used to be a liberal a few years back, but never received such hatred from conservative libertarians. It always surprised me how cool they were, rarely had any problems with them.
Well I'm an independent and while I can say the left can blow things out of proportion at times and that it gets more attention due to media coverage, this video is kind of saying you hate them for hating you. Can any of you honestly say if you met a total stranger besides the fact that all you know about them is their a democrat you wouldn't automatically hold contempt for them at all?
@mallrat182 There are Democrats who aren't patently retarded.
In Congress, they're called "Blue Dogs" (not sure where they came up with that name). I was once a Democrat myself, but then I grew up and matured into a rational thinking adult. (Used to HAAAATE Newt Gingrich, now I enjoy what he has to say. I voted Clinton in my first Election in 96, as well as for Boxer and Feinstein (oops!!)).
lol I think liberals want everyone to be treated equally too. The diference is, liberals arent pretending that "races" are equal as is and believe there is still work to do in making social inequalities disappear.
It's true! They know without a shadow of a doubt that some races are sub-human and thus incapable of competing with others or taking control of their lives despite all the evidence to the contrary. Therein lies my problem with liberals.
A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that it does this task so well. It gives people what they want instead of what a particular group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. — Milton Friedman
Klavan is a moron. It is fanatics like this who spit out the propaganda which is so harmful to our nation. This guy is no patriot. He seems to hate the US.
This asshole seems to forget the everpresent accusastions of treason and terrorism he and the right-wing cast against Obama, Clinton and anyone on the left. He seems to forget their demonization of Muslims, Mexican, the poor and imigrants of all kinds.
@dtorfleming How does the right demonize mexicans? Illegal immigration is a problem for all countries, whether they are Mexican or not matter little. Illegals are threatened themselves, but also retaliate and often steal from people in the areas that they move through to get into the US, if you have never lived in Texas, California, New Mexico, or Arizona, than you cannot possibly understand the threat that many pose to the livelihood of American people.
"Where they are branding a facist for wanting more liberty, Where they are called racist for wanting to treat people equally" That is where he lost his argument since they do not want that nor treat people that way. Especially considering he used Ann Coulter and Horowitz as his idea of good republicans. He had a very valid point till then. The truth is there are people on both sides who are nuts.
@Rsthaliot The truth is fascists share the same big government idea as liberals, and if you treat people unequally it is racism, liberals want both bigger government and quotas and this and that for anyone that is not white. That is treating people differently not on their character alone, but on the color of their skin alone.
@RockoJoe90 I am neither a liberal nor conservative. Liberals are far more socialism then facist. As it stands the extremes on both sides are treating people unequally. The left for their hypocrisy of treating non-Christian and non-white people as inferior to other religions and races, and the right for their extensive attacks against homosexuals and Muslims. As I said below Ann Coulter and Horowitz are prime examples of bad people on the right. Obama and Eco-terrorists on the left
@Rsthaliot Fascists ARE socialists, that is an important thing to understand. Conservatives would be happy to allow every man and woman to make their own decision. However, liberals want to expand government to a point that people are limited in their freedoms.
Not all liberals consciously want this, but those that they are electing do indeed want this.
@RockoJoe90 "Conservatives would be happy to allow every man and woman to make their own decision. " If it fits within Judeo-Christian belief, otherwise no they absolutely do not. Socialism and Fascism differ very greatly but are both extreme ends of a spectrum. Conservative are expanding government as well so that is calling the kettle black, remember the patriot act.
@Rsthaliot As a whole (remember that statement) conservatives are about little government, some examples of it being expanded by tiny increments does not prove the above statement false, but rather are the exceptions that prove rather than disprove. Socialism and fascism are not on opposite sides of the spectrum, fascism is just a slightly more extreme version of socialism. And yes, they do believe in equal opportunities for everybody AS A WHOLE, I'm not going to say that racists don't exist.
Conservatives are not about limited government. Please reference the accomplishments of Bush and Reagan.
And you are dead wrong: since fascism is a union of government and corporate interests it is the exact opposite of socialist which unifies government with the people. If might be helpful for you to study fascism further. It has an actual definition.
@dtorfleming EVERY fascist regime has been born out of a socialist party that has taken it to the extreme. They are not on opposite sides of the spectrum. Hitler (fascist dictator numero uno) was a socialist in all of his policies before ww2 started, and how is fascism between corporations and government? The definition is people putting the state before themselves, ie giving up personal freedoms for "common good."
Oh, and Bush was a social conservative and an economic liberal, as was Reagan.
Fascist numero uno was Mussolini who coined the term with his Italian Fascist Party. He declared the proletariat revolution a failure and suggested a new direction for Italy.
Hitler's brownshirts were waging political and street war against the socialist and communists in German throughout the late 20s and 30s.
The definition is one you made up, not one based upon history or factual information.
Benito Mussolini consolidated control over the Fascist movement in 1919 with the founding of the Fasci italiani di combattimento, whose opposition to socialism he declared: "We declare war against socialism, not because it is socialism, but because it has opposed nationalism".
Per Roger Griffin (Oxford Political Theorist): Fascism: an elite-led "armed party" which attemps to generate a populist movement through a liturgical style of politics and a programme of radical policies which promised to overcome a threat posed by international socialism, to end the degeneration affecting the nation under liberalism...
This sounds a bit like the right-wing lunatics in the US who scream about the dangers of socialism and liberalism, doesn't it?
@Rsthaliot "As I said below Ann Coulter and Horowitz are prime examples of bad people on the right." So Ann Coulter is a bad person because of?? Advocating violence against someone who thinks a different view point? Hoping that, let's say, Dick Cheney has a fatal heart attack? The only openly bad people seem to spew their hatred from the left, wanting Christians and Conservatives to die, Nazi's the list goes on and on, shall I continue? And those are examples of 'moderate' liberals.
@Drumboy5165 So Coulter is a good person? We will use your list. "Advocating violence against someone who thinks a different view point?" She has done this many times. "Hoping that, let's say, Dick Cheney has a fatal heart attack?" She has done this but with democrats "wanting Christians and Conservatives to die" She has called for the death of liberals , and Muslims. "Nazi's the list goes on and on" She draws the comparison to nazis constantly, and yes we definitely can go on.
All this right wing hatred might just cause that fat gas bag, vile asshole, piece of shit, rich, hyocritical worthless scumbag Michael Moore to explode.
You should have included the Daily Kos' comment on the grizzly deaths and desecreation of the private contractors in Iraq: "I feel nothing over the death of merceneries. [sic] They aren’t in Iraq because of orders, or because they are there trying to help the people make Iraq a better place. They are there to wage war for profit. Screw them."
The left thinks they can make us forget who they unabashedly were during Bushs's presidency. Let's not let them succeed.
I actually see more hatred and intolerance from the Liberal Left then from any other political party. It is sad that they live with such hatred for others but like any spoiled child, I just ignore them.
@JUDALATION One example, just watch MSNBC. Go spend some time (which I do) over at the Huffington Post or DailyKos. Projection.....hardly. Call it reality.
This guy is such an idiot. Ok, so suppose that someone calls a black man the "N" word. Is the black man supposed to just ignore it? If someone calls a gay man the "F" word, is that man supposed to make believe it didn't happen. Why do Ann Coulter and her ilk need body guards, because if you start spewing hatred just expect to have it hit you right back in the face. Klavan, you need psychiatric help badly. Yikes!
@NewWorldAhead Really? Please come out of your left-wing vacuum. Listen to someone besides Bill Maher. read something besides the NYT. Pay attention to the world around you. Far, far more hateful vile things are said by leftists about conservatives than the other way around. But hey! It's a lot easier to call someone stupid (like you just did) or racist (like you just did), or homophobic (like you just did) than to think or honestly examine your beliefs for anything related to truth.
@NewWorldAhead When you refer to the 'N' word, do you mean 'nigger?'
Anyway, it's the fashion now for niggers to call each other 'niggers.' So there is no need to be coy regarding that word. It's all out in the open now. Out of the closet, so to speak.
However, your basic point seems to be the same as Andrew's: if you disagree with the Left, expect violence.
@NewWorldAhead Anne Coulter and her ilk need body guards, b/c their opponents in the Left hate them for disagreement, not for spewing any kind of hate which frankly Lefties define hate as disagreement.
Prove concervotives want equality. I live in Oklahoma where the majority is concervotive and they believe they can tell the rest of us how to live our lives. Need proof? They banned same sex marriage wich is a violation of the 1st amendment as it is baced on religion, of the 9th amendment as it denys a one group of citozens a certin right while alowing the rest to retain the same right, and the 14th amendment as there is no justification for the law.
Nice try, attempting to equate Republican extremism to the work of the Democrats who have exposed them as extreme just by quoting them. Oh, sure, Barack Obama is a "fringe looney" of the Left. Give me a break. Anybody who pretends to believe that is definitely grasping at straws, with nothing else to cling to, since Republicans are looking like a bunch of incompetent hypocrites, and they have no one nearly qualified, knowledgeable, or intelligent enough to compete with Obama in 2012.
@Observer0026 Ah yes, "Republican extremism" like the fact that the segregationist Democrats created the KKK & Jim Crow etc after the Civil War to fight the ABOLITIONIST Republicans. Or that the Democrats had the full Grand Kleagle KKK man Sen Robert Byrd as their Democrat House Speaker for over 20 years or that the Democrats are supported by KKK speaker, mutual Hitler fan & negro hater Margaret Sangers Planned Parenthood. Got it.margaretsanger blogspot com zombietime com PJTV com breitbart com
@gmakepiece You are talking about the Lincon republicans, who were the liberals of the time... the north was always fighing for more rights for minorities... nice try, but truly a sad attempt of trying to make conservatives look like the good guys when they are actually the bad guys as always. Are you ashamed of the south and trying to ride the coat tails of liberals? Cant blaim you!
@JUDALATION Er, riiight. Utter logical fallacy balls. Hey, but you're a left infected liberal, so I "Cant blaim" you. You don't really read, do you, but you have clearly learned to Pavlov's Dog and parrot your Marxist Critical Theory and liberal cognitive dissonant fraud talking twit points. Good liberal mob conformist.
@gmakepiece You did not dispute my accusation... Liberals have always been the party of freedom for everyone, and conservatives are still the party of getting into peoples lives and denying their libery. YOU ARE THE REAL COMMUNIST! You dont know that Facism and Communism are radical conservative ideology.
@JUDALATION Ah, I see on ya profile & in your laughable unread logical fallacy sodden comments, that U enjoy fantasy made from whole cloth. Good left liberal. Thus not a shred of sourced evidence is provided. Now I'm a "COMMUNIST!" a"Fascist" AND a conservative. Riiight. Er, conservatism is the 4 principles of limited government, low tax, respect 4 The Constitution, respect 4 life & personal responsibility. "denying libery" via the state, coercion & mob shoutdown conformity IS left & liberal.
@JUDALATION U have shown U R an unread fraud, post logical fallacy responses 2 all the books U have never read & can never empirically refute, like these. Good left liberal mob liar. Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg. United In Hate, the left's romance with tyranny by Jamie Glazov. Shakedown Socialism by Oleg Atbashian. The Shadow Party by David Horowitz. Culture of Corruption by Michelle Malkin. Demonic, how the liberal mob is endangering America by Anne Coulter. After America by Mark Steyn
@JUDALATION REASON 5. Black Republican Congressman Lt Col Allen B West & Congressman Tim Scott, Latino Congressman Marco Rubio & 84 other diverse people were endorsed by The Tea Party & voted into Congress. Democrats expand welfare dependency 2 keep a permanent voter base as Democrats can NEVER win without black votes. Democrats R the supreme racists & always have been. I provided film, archived empirical sourced data..a Himalaya of facts. You provide only logical fallacy fraud. Good liberal.
i like this guys brilliant reasoning. i see 2 year olds reasoning in the same way, and i applaud them for that too. what a hero. i bet he even finished elementary school. look how smart he is.
@xdroon3 Excellent logical fallacy ad hominem cognitive dissonance. 5 stars. Thus U avoid focusing on a single point where Klavan is allegedly wrong THEN countering with your brilliant counter evidence. Good unread incurious passively indoctrinated left liberal. zombietime com, PJTV com, thepeoplescube com, lookingattheleft com, dissectleft blogspot com, jihadwatch org, breitbart com, iowahawk typepad com, steynonline com, commieblaster com, dissectleft blogspot com, margaretsanger blogspot com
@gmakepiece wow this traitor obviously disagrees with heroes like me and the bald fag. heroes like us completely disagree with you and we spit on you unpatriotic fucktards. but we didnt expect much more from inbred criminals like you.
@xdroon3 Excellent emotional UNREAD laughably ignorant logical fallacy. Klavan is a married heterosexual patriot conservative and is very very successful for very good reasons. Thus YOU are watching him and NO ONE is watching you. Oh, you'e jealous. Good leftard. Also the feeble epithet of "fag" aimed at Klavan is nonsensical as I do believe he's rather more secure in his sexuality than say er, you. Klavan is no tedious hater of people for their sexuality. You are a silly twit.
@gmakepiece o wow this retarded skippy dares to question the patriotism of me and this fellow hero faggot. just because you come from a retarded country of inbred criminals, doesnt give you the right to question our superior rationale. fucktard.
@xdroon3 Irrational, incoherent, highly emotional, crude, laughable, grossly immature, UNREAD, ironic racist and hate filled bigot, homosexual hating as an argument drivelling, wilfully ignorant and spouting logical fallacy cognitive dissonance by the dozen. You are a good indoctrinated left liberal.
@gmakepiece this aussie fag just gave a brilliant list of reasons why he would not be fit for the prestigious job of dogcatcher. but i would put "retarded" in there as well. what a masterpiece comment though, coming from a country of inbred criminals, im pleasantly surprised one of them has developed reading and writing capabilities. at retard level obviously, but im still happy to see it though. lol
” Racists believe that all individuals who share superficial physical characteristics are alike: as collectivists, racists think only in terms of groups. By encouraging Americans to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called “diversity” actually perpetuate racism. You don’t have freedom because you are a hyphenated American; you have freedom because you are an individual, and that should be protected.” — Ron Paul
Every word he says is gold. I hate to agree totally with someone, it makes me feel like less of a unique thinker but he tells it like it is flawlessly. It is so perfect because when people like Klavan speak it draws a clear line who the crazy people are. They are the ones who disagree with him.
@101Politricks I generally find Conservative "dirt throwing" takes the place of unveiling of hidden agendas (ACORN,) simple criticism, mere satire, and the occasional angry dude writing comments on Youtube videos. Liberal portrayal of Conservatives, however, falls apart with a good look at historical facts. (Hitler, a right-winger? He had a well laid out plan to gradually demolish all belief in the Judeo-Christian god. Kennedy, a pacifist? He was a hawk, with no plans to pull out of Vietnam.)
@SteamCenturion Yeah well Hitler was a facist, therefore he was right-wing. You cant however compare this to the Republicans or Tea Party. Still America does not need a new face, and a new slogan in politics, America needs a change of the system(my opinion)
@101Politricks HA! Laughable. Hitler was a Classical Republican, a Progressive leader, and a neo-Pagan. Fascism is by definition left wing, because it is classical republican, progressive, and neo-Pagan. Hitler gave Germany a new system. Before, it had a democratic republic, somewhat like ours. After his swift rise to power, he replaced it, like you would have us do, and in its place stood National Socialism, Liberalism distilled.
Conservativism isn't a new face, and its definitely not a slogan.
@SteamCenturion No, he wasnt left-wing. He hated the left, the first people who were inprisoned in his concentration camps were communists, socialists, and social democrats if they refused to join him. The Labour and Socialist International were a united left wing front in europe calling for joint action against Nazism and Hitler. The conservatives how ever joint Hitler no questions asked, because just like the reps hitler was pro-buisness. The reps in Gmany dont get over 5% today becz of it
@101Politricks You kid, right? Check your Nazi propaganda, they were against: Communists, Social Democrats, and... CAPITALISTS (yeah, somehow all three groups were in cahoots with the Jews and Freemasons). Hitler and the Nazis were against EVERYONE who wasnt them. They did promote "social programs" to get popularity and seized companies or controlled others (typically viewed as "leftist policies"). But in reality Nazism was on a path of its own, neither Liberal nor Conservative.
@101Politricks Hitler hated Communists and Socialists, as well as social welfare (survival of the fittest afterall, his genocidal tendencies and whatnot) But he hated Capitalists even more. He hated having to work with them on Germany's industry, and as the war continued he increasingly had the state take over various parts of German industry. Hitler wasnt pro-buisness, he was pro-economic growth, which he believed couldnt come from individual people creating buisnesses.
@101Politricks "The conservatives how ever joint Hitler no questions asked" - Many monarchist groups joined him, many nationalists groups joined him, but then again many workers joined him as well, fed up with socialist groups. But Conservatives? Nationalists and Monarchists mabye, but Capitalists and those in favor of Republic, NO! And most conservative groups were betrayed later. The monarchists were stabbed in the back for example. I'm sorry, your history is incorrect here.
For all the Libs/Lefties in adding to Mason Weaver's statement: We had and continue to have a REAL war on poverty that actually works: It's called capitalism. Capitalism leads to the creation of wealth and brings wealth to even the lowest echelons of society. Even they are brought up through increasing wages, and benefits and greater opportunity. That comes w/freedom. Freedom & capitalism eliminate poverty. Gov has been a proven failure at all. That's reality, not your fantasies.
@philip0460 Just vacuous insults. This is why I didn't bother watching your rants. You really just insult and provide no depth of thought. It's pathetic.
How about this for hot air: watch?v=iGdwsvj5k8Y
Yeah, those Lefties in WI were real peaceful! NOT!
@philip0460 ON the Great Society of LBJ more than $3 trillion was spent. Did that alleviate poverty? No. IN fact BEFORE it was implemented poverty was going down by 0.5% per year. Then afterwards it remained steady. Gov programs don't work. The pursuit of profits leads to the creation of wealth and that includes the creation of jobs. That eliminates poverty. As Adam Smith stated, the pursuit of the common good or public good rarely really does any good. Pursuit of profit does far more good.
@philip0460 Your use of the phrase "LOL" makes you sound juvenile, and it makes you look as if you think yourself incredibly witty. This makes you seem arrogant.
Of course, most of the Liberals I know are the types to live in those nice, fancy suburban neighborhoods that hire illegal aliens. I live in a somewhat run down neighborhood, where people do their own yardwork. Yet I have been slandered as a corporate elitist teabagger.
What about that form of racism that men like you direct at the blacks in the form of shade-ism. Oh that's right, it doesn't exist... and thankfully it doesn't exist because hypocrisy stinks in the nostrils of both G-d and men.
THIS GUY IN THIS VIDEO IS SO FULL OF SHIT IT HURTS. THERE IS WAY MUCH MORE RIGHT WING TEABAGGING HATRED OF PROGRESSIVES (i.e, Ann Coulter, Rush Limpballs, Hannity, Savage, Laura Ingraham... to name a few. And if you don't believe me just look at any video on YouTube with these idiots in it and you will see my point.
@philip0460 You mean like the hate that the Progressives preach toward their opponents such as lumping them w/ Jared Loughner or employing SIXHIRB against them w/o any justification(Sexist, Islamophobic, Xenophobic, Homophobic, Intolerant, Racist, Bigoted) and using other means to shut them up. Real haters = the Left.
Yeah, you're right.... the Fox Snooze poll and the Rush Limpball poll LOLOL. The rightest wing poll, the Rasmussen Poll, has already proven you are a bold faced liar. MOST Americans are AGAINST the war on collective bargaining rights of working class people. Read a damn newspaper dude.
@philip0460 I already responded. The collective bargaining is being limited, not eliminated. I actually am in favor of getting rid of public employee unions, b/c they enable public employees to work w/politicians toward taking whatever they want from the tax payer coffers. After all the "boss"(politicians) & unions are on the same side w/taxpayers on the other & unless tax payers raise Hell, they get screwed. Private employee unions don't have that prob as they are on opposite sides w/ the co.
@philip0460 Most polls favor Walker over Unions. I have been reading up on this including the Rasmussen poll.
The state of WI is broke. Other states are broke and municipalities w/$3 trillion in debt thanks mainly due to ridiculously enormous pensions of public employee unions screwing over tax payers. The tax payers INCLUDE private sector employees & small businesses mainly and they have decided that enough is enough. It's time to fight back against the public employee union bullies.
Again, you seem to be shooting yourself in the foot. First of all, the workers DID concede on lowering their salaries and benefits, but for some reason that's not enough. I would like to see the day, which will come if this idiot governor gets his way, where YOU the worker will also take a pay cut even in the private sector. You know why? Because once salaries are brought down, the private sector too will follow suit. So I hope you will enjoy working for $3.50 an hour w/o bennies
@philip0460 Did I say that workers didn't concede at all? No. You are putting words in my mouth. I referred to further pensions and future means of salary and benefits. This has nothing to do w/the private sector as that is a negotiation between worker & management & market forces anyway. The private sector won't follow suit if salaries in the public sector is brought down, b/c market forces work w/private sector salaries and benefits, which the public sector doesn't.
@philip0460 How many times did I say that workers made concessions? Go reread my posts. Apparently you need to review them. Next there won't be pay cuts in the private sector due to pay cuts in the public sector. Why? B/c there will be LESS taxes to pay & there is NO RELATION between the wage scale in the private sector via market forces vs the public sector of tax dollars. Wages & benefits improved w/o unions as the general rule as only 3% of workers were in unions in 1900.
Well, to put an end to this... the governor is losing the war of public opinion. It won't be long till he will have to concede to the workers. So keep licking the ass of the rich... maybe there's something in it for you, who knows. But all I know is I'm a part of the American middle class and the people that matter to me are the workers of this country. So keep licking the rich people's butts cause I guarantee you they will screw you sooner or later. Bye.
@philip0460 How is wealth created in a society? How are jobs created? Why was there no depression of the 1920's as there was of the 1930's? Why have businesses in droves fled from CA to nearby states and the Hollywood film industry moved to other states or to Canada?
How does a business function? How is it managed? How did former luxury items such as coffee, sugar, tea, paper, soap become cheap and common place? Where has gov ever made things cheaper and of better quality?
Wealth is created when the MIDDLE CLASS has the money to actually buy the goods and services. Take money away from the middle class, and the country goes down the tubes! It's fact dude. I'm done with you. Please stop your idiotic bullshit. I hope and pray you get a huge pay cut... oh, and please don't cry about it. Once the unions are cut out, the bar will be lowered and companies will cut YOUR salary and YOUR benefits. Get and damn education. DON'T REPLY TO THIS PLEASE.
@philip0460 Wrong. Wealth is created when products are created via profits. The Middle class buys when wages are paid to them as part of the costs that are covered to ensure such profits. Purchasing doesn't create wealth, but expends wealth. Selling creates wealth AFTER the products are produced. Purchasing doesn't cause the creation of products, but the profit motive does. & BTW, I repeatedly have responded to you about how cuts in wages in the public sector have NOTHING to do w/private sector.
Person A has 10 chips, Person B has 2 chips, and Person 3 and 1 chip. A car costs 4 chips. Who gets to buy the car? LOL What a moron. If you don't have money you don't buy. Why is that so hard to understand. During the Bush era he cut taxes enormously for the corporations... how many jobs were created? ZERO. Nobody had money to buy them... except the richer people
@philip0460 Actually unemployment plummetted to around 5% under Bush after taxes were lowerred. and that is despite the 2 wars. Unemployment really only increased AFTER Pelosi & the Dems took over in 2007. The same occurred under Reagan, Harding & Coolidge.
Entrepreneurs in fact have sought to make products cheaper, so they will work to get Person 3 & Person 2 to purchase more easily w/cheaper techniques. That happened w/sugar, coffee, paper, soap and other formerly luxury items.
Well, once Person 2 and Person 3 can make a living wage and purchase items they need instead of giving tax breaks to the ones who really don't need it, then we will get back on track. I hope the message from the people of Wisconsin echoes across this country. Well, of course, minus Texas and Oklahoma LOL
@philip0460 When the "rich" get their tax breaks, they can HIRE more people including Person 2 & 3 and provide them w/their wages for more spending power. Oh, & the "rich" can find ways of making products cheaper so that Person 2 & 3 can afford them more easily. That occurred w/former luxury items such as paper, sugar, coffee, tea & steel. BTW, please name me 1 item that gov made cheaper & of better quality?
Ok. Again playing devil's advocate. Ok we lowered taxes on the rich. Now we need to fund a war, fix roads, fund education, help the poor, etc.? Where do we get the money? Oh, I know! The middle class LOL
@philip0460 cont... Clarification. That is unemployment plummetted under Reagan, Coolidge & Harding after massive tax cuts on the highest brackets occurred. Increasing taxes on the "rich" really just causes them to seek tax shelters and loopholes as occurred in the 1930's, after WII and in later periods. Revenues plummetted and the economy sufferred from diminishing activity. That is what really occurs w/taxes.
Ok. Let me play devil's advocate. How do you propose to raise federal revenue? Let's just tax the middle class and remove taxes from the rich. Then the United States will be like a banana republic with VEEEEEEEEEEEEERY rich people and VEEEEEEEEEEEEERY poor people. Would that please you? What a damn fool! Laslty, aren't you in the middle class? What do you do for a living? I will bet you aren't a laborer, work in Walmart, or have a public sector job LOL.
@philip0460 Did I say just tax the MC & remove taxes from the rich? No. I said cutting taxes on the rich AND I'll add the MC as well. Lower taxes has consistently led to higher revenues. Go do your research on the Harding/Coolidge cuts, JFK cuts & Reagan cuts. You keep distorting what I stated and ignoring actual facts. You also didn't answer most of my ?s: Why was there no Depression of the 1920's unilke 1930's. 1921: Unemployment 11%, Inflation 20%. That was WORSE than 1930, 1980, & 2008.
You haven't answered my questions AT ALL!!!! Are you dense or slow or what? I asked you HOW DO YOU EXPECT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO ATTAIN REVENUE BY LOWERING TAXES ON THE RICH? WHERE DOES THE MONEY COME FROM? DOES IT TRICKLE UP TO THE FEDERAL GOV'T? lol
@philip0460 I have answered your ?. Lowering taxes INCREASES economic activity and that ironically leads to increase in revenue. That has worked consistently in the 1920s, 1960's, 1980's & early 2000s. Increase in economic activity produces an increase in revenue.
You really don't listen. It's pathetic. BTW, we had private education in most of out history & 56% of roads in Italy are private. State of IN has privatized its roads too. Help poor? Let non profit charities do that. Gov sux at it.
Are you avoiding my question on purpose or are you so afflicted with tunnel vision that you don't hear what you don't want to hear? How do we fund the FEDERAL government? Does the private sector send money to the federal government?
@philip0460 I ANSWERED YOU SEVERAL TIMES. Here it is: 1)Lowering taxes INCREASES revenue. 2)How? By increasing economic activity. That increase in economic activity INCREASES revenue to the fed gov & other govs. 3)Yes, that has worked consistently under Harding, Coolidge, LBJ(per JFK tax cuts), Reagan & Bush '43. Go read on Andrew Mellon from the Harding admin. Go read on the Laffer Curve from Arthur Laffer. The Laffer curve has consistently proven correct. cont...
@philip0460 Who pays for taxes on corporations? Not corporations. Answer: Corporations just pass on such taxes to consumers. Meaning consumers or the "middle class" or "working class" pays for the corporate taxes. That means increase in prices too. Increases in prices means less demand and less sales, which means less revenue for the government.
I referred to individual incomes anyway, not corporate taxes.
Unfortunately, ya lost me at HODUKEN... I'll try to watch it again.
RangeViperM249 2 days ago
Right on Andrew as allways!! There is an undeniable beauty in the spoken truth.
klamath1016 1 week ago
@klamath1016 Very punny.
CCPcakes 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Nawor666 So whites never even elected a minority even though for many years this country was 40 percent black (before southerners opened the floodgates to Europe) but its Blacks who are Brainwashed? Why the Hell would ANYONE vote for a republican post Bush? You whites will soon be a minority in America so it would behoove you to stop attacking minorities with these false accusations or move back to Europe.
JUDALATION 1 week ago
Comment removed
JUDALATION 1 week ago
Comment removed
JUDALATION 1 week ago
@Nawor666 So whites never even elected a minority even though for many years this country was 40 percent black (before southerners opened the floodgates to Europe) but its Blacks who are Brainwashed? Why the Hell would ANYONE vote for a republican post Bush? You whites will soon be a minority in America so it would behoove you to stop attacking minorities with these false accusations or move back to Europe.
JUDALATION 1 week ago
@JUDALATION post continued...If you were a Black man who worked his way through school and collage and then made a lot of money starting your own business yet vote exactly the same way as another Black man who didn't even show any interest in going to school and is on the public dime, then at least one of the two men is the fool. Personal interests should be different enough in the Black community for them to not be voting 95% one way, and racism arguments are not cover for it either
CyberSpaceman81 1 week ago
@CyberSpaceman81 What other Group were slaves just a century ago? What other group has as much poverty? You are ignoring the reality that Blacks wont vote for the conservatives who are very racist to this day! Why the hell would any black person vote republican? name 4 reasons that dont have any racist steriotypes attached... If you think its bad now just wait till minorities take over the south... this will be a democratic century, Your party is dead on arival chump!
JUDALATION 1 week ago
Comment removed
CyberSpaceman81 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JUDALATION This country has had racism for countless groups. Even supposed "free" immigrant groups had to fight just to get slave labor paying jobs when signs Like "No Irish need Apply" were in vogue. They would come over fresh of the boat and have to fight for the union and the emancipation of people whose free Black brethren were even chosen over them for jobs. Yet the majority did fight for the union and worked to get in to posts of community status to gain more acceptance.
CyberSpaceman81 1 week ago
@JUDALATION The notion of "color" was a scapegoat used for Black enslavement, Nazis called Jews "Vermin" as a scapegoat, and African tribes took slaves of their neighbors even before the slave trade and used "Tribal" difference. The modern "Civil Rights" movement doesn't see racism and slavery as a universal human trait of using scapegoats, they have instead focused on the same identity politics of their enslaver and alienated other groups by viewing things from notions "White" guilt
CyberSpaceman81 1 week ago
@JUDALATION By Identifying by the same scapegoat as those who enslaved here, African Americans have created a culture that doesn't view the past slavery of other Ethnic european "White" poeple by european white slaveholders in Europe or Native Africans by native Africans in the same light as their enslavement here, they instead view their slavery as separate by a supposed REALITY of "color" and not as kindred HUMAN failing. That is where the notion of perpetual race guilt comes from
CyberSpaceman81 1 week ago
@JUDALATION You may try and say conservatives are racists, yet the mass of Liberals of identity politics don't identify their slavery hardships with the hardships and slavery of other people of differing skin color, and the advantage politics of Liberal Minorities is in contrast to groups like the Irish who were treated with racism who had no allowed podium then and had to work into accepted full assimilation. The tenor of minority politics is to keep apart and keep advantages.
CyberSpaceman81 1 week ago
@JUDALATION YOU are clearly a racist as EVERYTHING for you is about race. You sight not a shred of evidence. You really are a laughably unread logical fallacy spouting cognitive dissonant lying phony twerp. YOU are a left liberal. You're blocked too, so I won't see you unsourced race baiting junk. Toodle ooh.
gmakepiece 1 week ago
@JUDALATION "racist! racist! racist!" The first card and only argument of the left liberal racist. Everyone, everything and anything is "racist!" Reason 1. The pro slavery Democrats created the KKK & enforced Jim Crow & Segregation up until the 60's with Democrats like Sen Byrd fillibustering to stop civil rights legislation. Reason 2. The bottom ten cities & states with the most black poverty have been Democrat governed for over 46 to over 100 years.
gmakepiece 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JUDALATION REASON 3. Racist eugenicist Marxist drug addict, group sex fan & KKK speaker Margaret Sanger, was admired by Hitler who used her ideas. Sanger said that she wanted 2 "exterminate the negro race", She got close 2 that goal by creating Planned Parenthood. Always concentrated in black & ethnic minority areas. PP has killed over 13 million black babies since 1973, making millions of dollars. THAT'S RACISM. PP is a massive Obama supporter & BO loves PP. margaretsanger blogspot com
gmakepiece 1 week ago
@JUDALATION Reason 4. Easily Utube found docos 'MAAFA21 Black Genocide', 'Racism In The Democrat Party' & 'Emancipation Revolation Revolution' or via errvideo com. & PJTV com's Alphonso Rachel, Sonja Schmidt, Bill Whittle, Andrew Klavan, Mr Hicks etc. Left Dems on photo parade at zombietime com, lookingattheleft com, ringospictures com, thepeoplescube com, commieblaster com, jihadwatch org, atlasshrug2000 typepad com, braitbart com, michelllemalkin com steynonlline com
gmakepiece 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JUDALATION So I guess that the racist pro Segregation, pro Jim Crow creating & enforcing Dixie Democrats of George Wallace, Bull Connor, Orval Faubus & Grand Kleagle Democrat House Speaker Sen Byrd, were the uh, "liberals of their day" then. U don't appear 2 read, R clearly a natural born glib liar & more logical fallacy prone than..well, U R a left liberal. Carry on..Er, the Democrats created the KKK, Jim Crow AND Segregation. They mob attacked the first BLACK CONGRESSMEN out of Congress..
gmakepiece 1 week ago
@JUDALATION You really are dense, Black people are the only group in this nation who votes as high as 95% for only one party You can pretend that that is because one parties is supposedly just an oh so "racist" party and Black people should vote 95% the other way. Yet even in the Black community their are people of lesser and greater means and difffering values.... to be continued in next post.
CyberSpaceman81 1 week ago
Both sides have a hand in this hatred, so do not pretend utter innocence because that is just disingenuousness of the first water.
MrNeodarwinian 1 week ago
This years C-PAC told the Gay republicans to stay away, while opening their arms to The WHITE SUPREMICIST GROUPS! This is after they attacked blacks as brainwashed for voting for the first Black president at 90%, Never mind whites have done it at 100% in every previous election. Conservatism is a mental disorder, making them incapible of looking at facts. EVERY shooter that blows up an abortion clinic is conservative!
JUDALATION 2 weeks ago
SAME THING HERE IN ISRAEL......SADZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
BENREDARES 3 weeks ago
Thumb up if you were too busy watching the little videos to listen to Andrew talk.
MonfangHowlett 3 weeks ago
This rings so true, I have Liberals attacking me all the time when I voice an opinion that's anything but P.C. I'm supposed to tolerate them but they won't give me the same consideration. You can have an opinion only if it's liberal and P.C.
TRUMPHMAN 3 weeks ago 5
@TRUMPHMAN Left liberals only love a diversity of their own opinion.
gmakepiece 1 week ago
@TRUMPHMAN Same here, on Youtube I received the most hatred from leftist liberals and democrats. If you say something they do not agree with, you're automatically a moron, worthless etc. Often I get such remarks from people who can't even spell right. Clearly left wing ideologies tend to be intolerant and hateful.
I used to be a liberal a few years back, but never received such hatred from conservative libertarians. It always surprised me how cool they were, rarely had any problems with them.
TWSceptic 5 days ago 4
Well I'm an independent and while I can say the left can blow things out of proportion at times and that it gets more attention due to media coverage, this video is kind of saying you hate them for hating you. Can any of you honestly say if you met a total stranger besides the fact that all you know about them is their a democrat you wouldn't automatically hold contempt for them at all?
mallrat182 1 month ago
@mallrat182 There are Democrats who aren't patently retarded.
In Congress, they're called "Blue Dogs" (not sure where they came up with that name). I was once a Democrat myself, but then I grew up and matured into a rational thinking adult. (Used to HAAAATE Newt Gingrich, now I enjoy what he has to say. I voted Clinton in my first Election in 96, as well as for Boxer and Feinstein (oops!!)).
bayushizero 3 weeks ago
@bayushizero I won't hold it against you, I don't live in California. :p
gdbalck 3 weeks ago in playlist Andrew Klavan
@gdbalck I was once duped by the media into hating the Republicans. Yet I still loved certain Republicans, like Reagan.
If you're under 30 and a Republican, you're heartless. If you're over 30 and a Democrat, you're brain dead.
Very VERY fitting quote, there. Wish I knew who said it.
bayushizero 3 weeks ago
@bayushizero as people mature they become more conservative, that's not a coincidence
Zac6230 2 weeks ago
2:38 annoying orange is apparently a leftist.
nixthenamed 1 month ago 10
@nixthenamed So is the "Leave Britney alone" gal.
MelvinThe42 6 days ago
@MelvinThe42 He's a guy
stephjuhler999 1 day ago
Kitty!
1Co118 1 month ago
LOL its Ron PAul a righ winger thats the best candidate there is for the US
Abbadon380 1 month ago
lol I think liberals want everyone to be treated equally too. The diference is, liberals arent pretending that "races" are equal as is and believe there is still work to do in making social inequalities disappear.
YoungTon22 1 month ago
@YoungTon22
It's true! They know without a shadow of a doubt that some races are sub-human and thus incapable of competing with others or taking control of their lives despite all the evidence to the contrary. Therein lies my problem with liberals.
AUScorpion 1 month ago in playlist Andrew Klavan
@AUScorpion I meant social inequality not made up "racial" bullshit. There are many liberal "minorities" that arent in social programs.
YoungTon22 1 month ago
@AUScorpion Haha, I saw whatchu did there. ;)
A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that it does this task so well. It gives people what they want instead of what a particular group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. — Milton Friedman
Jordoom777 1 month ago
Klavan is a moron. It is fanatics like this who spit out the propaganda which is so harmful to our nation. This guy is no patriot. He seems to hate the US.
dtorfleming 1 month ago
@dtorfleming Really? His words are harmful? Good god. Grow a spine will you?!?
hooplablahblahblah 1 month ago 2
Wow. Klavan is a special kind of Moron.
This asshole seems to forget the everpresent accusastions of treason and terrorism he and the right-wing cast against Obama, Clinton and anyone on the left. He seems to forget their demonization of Muslims, Mexican, the poor and imigrants of all kinds.
I wonder why he forget this?
dtorfleming 1 month ago
@dtorfleming How does the right demonize mexicans? Illegal immigration is a problem for all countries, whether they are Mexican or not matter little. Illegals are threatened themselves, but also retaliate and often steal from people in the areas that they move through to get into the US, if you have never lived in Texas, California, New Mexico, or Arizona, than you cannot possibly understand the threat that many pose to the livelihood of American people.
RockoJoe90 1 month ago
1:21-1:31 hahahahah
cmiller8492 2 months ago
You know why they're attacked? CAUSE THEY'RE CUNTS. That's why.
Riceqween01 2 months ago
@Riceqween01 Left-wing hate at its finest everybody!!!
RockoJoe90 2 months ago
Did anyone else notice that we all got rick rolled at 1:45?
flippityflop 2 months ago
@flippityflop OMG!! Saw it!!!
Drumboy5165 1 month ago
"Where they are branding a facist for wanting more liberty, Where they are called racist for wanting to treat people equally" That is where he lost his argument since they do not want that nor treat people that way. Especially considering he used Ann Coulter and Horowitz as his idea of good republicans. He had a very valid point till then. The truth is there are people on both sides who are nuts.
Rsthaliot 2 months ago
@Rsthaliot The truth is fascists share the same big government idea as liberals, and if you treat people unequally it is racism, liberals want both bigger government and quotas and this and that for anyone that is not white. That is treating people differently not on their character alone, but on the color of their skin alone.
RockoJoe90 2 months ago
@RockoJoe90 I am neither a liberal nor conservative. Liberals are far more socialism then facist. As it stands the extremes on both sides are treating people unequally. The left for their hypocrisy of treating non-Christian and non-white people as inferior to other religions and races, and the right for their extensive attacks against homosexuals and Muslims. As I said below Ann Coulter and Horowitz are prime examples of bad people on the right. Obama and Eco-terrorists on the left
Rsthaliot 2 months ago
@Rsthaliot Socialist*
Rsthaliot 2 months ago
@Rsthaliot Fascists ARE socialists, that is an important thing to understand. Conservatives would be happy to allow every man and woman to make their own decision. However, liberals want to expand government to a point that people are limited in their freedoms.
Not all liberals consciously want this, but those that they are electing do indeed want this.
RockoJoe90 2 months ago
@RockoJoe90 "Conservatives would be happy to allow every man and woman to make their own decision. " If it fits within Judeo-Christian belief, otherwise no they absolutely do not. Socialism and Fascism differ very greatly but are both extreme ends of a spectrum. Conservative are expanding government as well so that is calling the kettle black, remember the patriot act.
Rsthaliot 2 months ago
@Rsthaliot As a whole (remember that statement) conservatives are about little government, some examples of it being expanded by tiny increments does not prove the above statement false, but rather are the exceptions that prove rather than disprove. Socialism and fascism are not on opposite sides of the spectrum, fascism is just a slightly more extreme version of socialism. And yes, they do believe in equal opportunities for everybody AS A WHOLE, I'm not going to say that racists don't exist.
RockoJoe90 2 months ago
@RockoJoe90
Conservatives are not about limited government. Please reference the accomplishments of Bush and Reagan.
And you are dead wrong: since fascism is a union of government and corporate interests it is the exact opposite of socialist which unifies government with the people. If might be helpful for you to study fascism further. It has an actual definition.
dtorfleming 1 month ago
@dtorfleming EVERY fascist regime has been born out of a socialist party that has taken it to the extreme. They are not on opposite sides of the spectrum. Hitler (fascist dictator numero uno) was a socialist in all of his policies before ww2 started, and how is fascism between corporations and government? The definition is people putting the state before themselves, ie giving up personal freedoms for "common good."
Oh, and Bush was a social conservative and an economic liberal, as was Reagan.
RockoJoe90 1 month ago
@RockoJoe90
Are you too busy to do your homework?
Fascist numero uno was Mussolini who coined the term with his Italian Fascist Party. He declared the proletariat revolution a failure and suggested a new direction for Italy.
Hitler's brownshirts were waging political and street war against the socialist and communists in German throughout the late 20s and 30s.
The definition is one you made up, not one based upon history or factual information.
dtorfleming 1 month ago
@RockoJoe90
Since you can't bother to do reasearch:
Benito Mussolini consolidated control over the Fascist movement in 1919 with the founding of the Fasci italiani di combattimento, whose opposition to socialism he declared: "We declare war against socialism, not because it is socialism, but because it has opposed nationalism".
dtorfleming 1 month ago
@RockoJoe90
Per Roger Griffin (Oxford Political Theorist): Fascism: an elite-led "armed party" which attemps to generate a populist movement through a liturgical style of politics and a programme of radical policies which promised to overcome a threat posed by international socialism, to end the degeneration affecting the nation under liberalism...
This sounds a bit like the right-wing lunatics in the US who scream about the dangers of socialism and liberalism, doesn't it?
dtorfleming 1 month ago
@Rsthaliot "As I said below Ann Coulter and Horowitz are prime examples of bad people on the right." So Ann Coulter is a bad person because of?? Advocating violence against someone who thinks a different view point? Hoping that, let's say, Dick Cheney has a fatal heart attack? The only openly bad people seem to spew their hatred from the left, wanting Christians and Conservatives to die, Nazi's the list goes on and on, shall I continue? And those are examples of 'moderate' liberals.
Drumboy5165 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Drumboy5165 So Coulter is a good person? We will use your list. "Advocating violence against someone who thinks a different view point?" She has done this many times. "Hoping that, let's say, Dick Cheney has a fatal heart attack?" She has done this but with democrats "wanting Christians and Conservatives to die" She has called for the death of liberals , and Muslims. "Nazi's the list goes on and on" She draws the comparison to nazis constantly, and yes we definitely can go on.
Rsthaliot 1 month ago
Damn my ADD!! Too busy watching all the background T.V.'s to actually pay attention to what he's saying. lol, great video though.
1983madwolf 2 months ago in playlist Andrew Klavan - On the Culture
I agree, screw them.
UtherPendragan 3 months ago
lol 1:55 Random vid of bear wrestling man.
arivas713 3 months ago
All this right wing hatred might just cause that fat gas bag, vile asshole, piece of shit, rich, hyocritical worthless scumbag Michael Moore to explode.
ALTERED13TH 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ALTERED13TH We can only hope.
kacplaymyst 3 months ago
Mr. Klavin. You are brilliant! I'm honored to breath the same air as you.
webstercat 4 months ago
You should have included the Daily Kos' comment on the grizzly deaths and desecreation of the private contractors in Iraq: "I feel nothing over the death of merceneries. [sic] They aren’t in Iraq because of orders, or because they are there trying to help the people make Iraq a better place. They are there to wage war for profit. Screw them."
The left thinks they can make us forget who they unabashedly were during Bushs's presidency. Let's not let them succeed.
ArrogantAmerican333 5 months ago
TEDTALKS needs this man.
ralphmotorhead 5 months ago
That video was AMAZING!
ktoxic87 5 months ago
Right wing hatred has got to stop before democrats kill somebody!
willyohio 6 months ago
I actually see more hatred and intolerance from the Liberal Left then from any other political party. It is sad that they live with such hatred for others but like any spoiled child, I just ignore them.
clankster0000 6 months ago 22
@clankster0000 nice attack, can you provide one example? or are you just projecting...
JUDALATION 2 weeks ago
@JUDALATION One example, just watch MSNBC. Go spend some time (which I do) over at the Huffington Post or DailyKos. Projection.....hardly. Call it reality.
clankster0000 2 weeks ago
This guy is such an idiot. Ok, so suppose that someone calls a black man the "N" word. Is the black man supposed to just ignore it? If someone calls a gay man the "F" word, is that man supposed to make believe it didn't happen. Why do Ann Coulter and her ilk need body guards, because if you start spewing hatred just expect to have it hit you right back in the face. Klavan, you need psychiatric help badly. Yikes!
NewWorldAhead 7 months ago
@NewWorldAhead Really? Please come out of your left-wing vacuum. Listen to someone besides Bill Maher. read something besides the NYT. Pay attention to the world around you. Far, far more hateful vile things are said by leftists about conservatives than the other way around. But hey! It's a lot easier to call someone stupid (like you just did) or racist (like you just did), or homophobic (like you just did) than to think or honestly examine your beliefs for anything related to truth.
TheBruceGday 7 months ago
@NewWorldAhead When you refer to the 'N' word, do you mean 'nigger?'
Anyway, it's the fashion now for niggers to call each other 'niggers.' So there is no need to be coy regarding that word. It's all out in the open now. Out of the closet, so to speak.
However, your basic point seems to be the same as Andrew's: if you disagree with the Left, expect violence.
capturedpilot 6 months ago
@NewWorldAhead Anne Coulter and her ilk need body guards, b/c their opponents in the Left hate them for disagreement, not for spewing any kind of hate which frankly Lefties define hate as disagreement.
Aegius 5 months ago
"Clearly, this right wing hatred has got to stop, before democrats kill somebody."
That. Was. Hilarious.
Atreus21 7 months ago
I didn't know that Vampires laughed and brought palms to face at crosses.
rgzdev 7 months ago
Prove concervotives want equality. I live in Oklahoma where the majority is concervotive and they believe they can tell the rest of us how to live our lives. Need proof? They banned same sex marriage wich is a violation of the 1st amendment as it is baced on religion, of the 9th amendment as it denys a one group of citozens a certin right while alowing the rest to retain the same right, and the 14th amendment as there is no justification for the law.
jawj4291 7 months ago
Klaven rocks!
cisforcat 8 months ago
Bill Clinton was vile, but not a sexual predator!
ZiadKhaldun 8 months ago
THUMBS UP FOR THE ANNOYING ORANGE!
shonor6 8 months ago
Nice try, attempting to equate Republican extremism to the work of the Democrats who have exposed them as extreme just by quoting them. Oh, sure, Barack Obama is a "fringe looney" of the Left. Give me a break. Anybody who pretends to believe that is definitely grasping at straws, with nothing else to cling to, since Republicans are looking like a bunch of incompetent hypocrites, and they have no one nearly qualified, knowledgeable, or intelligent enough to compete with Obama in 2012.
Observer0026 8 months ago
@Observer0026 You're joking right?
astr0al3x 8 months ago
@Observer0026 Ah yes, "Republican extremism" like the fact that the segregationist Democrats created the KKK & Jim Crow etc after the Civil War to fight the ABOLITIONIST Republicans. Or that the Democrats had the full Grand Kleagle KKK man Sen Robert Byrd as their Democrat House Speaker for over 20 years or that the Democrats are supported by KKK speaker, mutual Hitler fan & negro hater Margaret Sangers Planned Parenthood. Got it.margaretsanger blogspot com zombietime com PJTV com breitbart com
gmakepiece 8 months ago
@gmakepiece
Observer0026 8 months ago
@gmakepiece You are talking about the Lincon republicans, who were the liberals of the time... the north was always fighing for more rights for minorities... nice try, but truly a sad attempt of trying to make conservatives look like the good guys when they are actually the bad guys as always. Are you ashamed of the south and trying to ride the coat tails of liberals? Cant blaim you!
JUDALATION 1 week ago
@JUDALATION Er, riiight. Utter logical fallacy balls. Hey, but you're a left infected liberal, so I "Cant blaim" you. You don't really read, do you, but you have clearly learned to Pavlov's Dog and parrot your Marxist Critical Theory and liberal cognitive dissonant fraud talking twit points. Good liberal mob conformist.
gmakepiece 1 week ago
@gmakepiece You did not dispute my accusation... Liberals have always been the party of freedom for everyone, and conservatives are still the party of getting into peoples lives and denying their libery. YOU ARE THE REAL COMMUNIST! You dont know that Facism and Communism are radical conservative ideology.
JUDALATION 1 week ago
@JUDALATION Ah, I see on ya profile & in your laughable unread logical fallacy sodden comments, that U enjoy fantasy made from whole cloth. Good left liberal. Thus not a shred of sourced evidence is provided. Now I'm a "COMMUNIST!" a"Fascist" AND a conservative. Riiight. Er, conservatism is the 4 principles of limited government, low tax, respect 4 The Constitution, respect 4 life & personal responsibility. "denying libery" via the state, coercion & mob shoutdown conformity IS left & liberal.
gmakepiece 1 week ago
Comment removed
gmakepiece 1 week ago
Comment removed
gmakepiece 1 week ago
@JUDALATION U have shown U R an unread fraud, post logical fallacy responses 2 all the books U have never read & can never empirically refute, like these. Good left liberal mob liar. Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg. United In Hate, the left's romance with tyranny by Jamie Glazov. Shakedown Socialism by Oleg Atbashian. The Shadow Party by David Horowitz. Culture of Corruption by Michelle Malkin. Demonic, how the liberal mob is endangering America by Anne Coulter. After America by Mark Steyn
gmakepiece 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JUDALATION REASON 5. Black Republican Congressman Lt Col Allen B West & Congressman Tim Scott, Latino Congressman Marco Rubio & 84 other diverse people were endorsed by The Tea Party & voted into Congress. Democrats expand welfare dependency 2 keep a permanent voter base as Democrats can NEVER win without black votes. Democrats R the supreme racists & always have been. I provided film, archived empirical sourced data..a Himalaya of facts. You provide only logical fallacy fraud. Good liberal.
gmakepiece 1 week ago
i like this guys brilliant reasoning. i see 2 year olds reasoning in the same way, and i applaud them for that too. what a hero. i bet he even finished elementary school. look how smart he is.
xdroon3 8 months ago
@xdroon3 Typical communist response of name calling. Where is your real argument that is backed with facts?
Dragdamar 8 months ago
@Dragdamar Typical neo-nazi response of name calling. Where is your real argument that is backed with facts?
xdroon3 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xdroon3 @xdroon3 Typical communist response of name calling. Where is your real argument that is backed with facts?
Dragdamar 8 months ago
@xdroon3 Excellent logical fallacy ad hominem cognitive dissonance. 5 stars. Thus U avoid focusing on a single point where Klavan is allegedly wrong THEN countering with your brilliant counter evidence. Good unread incurious passively indoctrinated left liberal. zombietime com, PJTV com, thepeoplescube com, lookingattheleft com, dissectleft blogspot com, jihadwatch org, breitbart com, iowahawk typepad com, steynonline com, commieblaster com, dissectleft blogspot com, margaretsanger blogspot com
gmakepiece 8 months ago
@gmakepiece wow this traitor obviously disagrees with heroes like me and the bald fag. heroes like us completely disagree with you and we spit on you unpatriotic fucktards. but we didnt expect much more from inbred criminals like you.
xdroon3 8 months ago
@xdroon3 Er, riiight. Sadly incoherent. You are addressing who exactly about what precisely? Carry on then.
gmakepiece 8 months ago
@xdroon3 Excellent emotional UNREAD laughably ignorant logical fallacy. Klavan is a married heterosexual patriot conservative and is very very successful for very good reasons. Thus YOU are watching him and NO ONE is watching you. Oh, you'e jealous. Good leftard. Also the feeble epithet of "fag" aimed at Klavan is nonsensical as I do believe he's rather more secure in his sexuality than say er, you. Klavan is no tedious hater of people for their sexuality. You are a silly twit.
gmakepiece 8 months ago
@gmakepiece o wow this retarded skippy dares to question the patriotism of me and this fellow hero faggot. just because you come from a retarded country of inbred criminals, doesnt give you the right to question our superior rationale. fucktard.
xdroon3 8 months ago
@xdroon3 Irrational, incoherent, highly emotional, crude, laughable, grossly immature, UNREAD, ironic racist and hate filled bigot, homosexual hating as an argument drivelling, wilfully ignorant and spouting logical fallacy cognitive dissonance by the dozen. You are a good indoctrinated left liberal.
gmakepiece 8 months ago
@gmakepiece this aussie fag just gave a brilliant list of reasons why he would not be fit for the prestigious job of dogcatcher. but i would put "retarded" in there as well. what a masterpiece comment though, coming from a country of inbred criminals, im pleasantly surprised one of them has developed reading and writing capabilities. at retard level obviously, but im still happy to see it though. lol
xdroon3 8 months ago
"Clearly this right-winged hatred has got to stop before democrats kill somebody!" LOL!!!! That is priceless!
HayleyMch 9 months ago 58
This has been flagged as spam show
” Racists believe that all individuals who share superficial physical characteristics are alike: as collectivists, racists think only in terms of groups. By encouraging Americans to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called “diversity” actually perpetuate racism. You don’t have freedom because you are a hyphenated American; you have freedom because you are an individual, and that should be protected.” — Ron Paul
vechorik 5 months ago
And I say, Screw em
ThatHaloGuy117 10 months ago
Every word he says is gold. I hate to agree totally with someone, it makes me feel like less of a unique thinker but he tells it like it is flawlessly. It is so perfect because when people like Klavan speak it draws a clear line who the crazy people are. They are the ones who disagree with him.
Astrochronic 10 months ago
haha The country is falling apart and you guys are arguing about what to call each other.
frogsoda 10 months ago
@frogsoda True that!!
Ron Paul 2012.. Keep your rights!!
ITDUBB5 10 months ago
Oh please, the Liberals and Conservatives throw equally dirt at each other.
101Politricks 11 months ago
@101Politricks I generally find Conservative "dirt throwing" takes the place of unveiling of hidden agendas (ACORN,) simple criticism, mere satire, and the occasional angry dude writing comments on Youtube videos. Liberal portrayal of Conservatives, however, falls apart with a good look at historical facts. (Hitler, a right-winger? He had a well laid out plan to gradually demolish all belief in the Judeo-Christian god. Kennedy, a pacifist? He was a hawk, with no plans to pull out of Vietnam.)
SteamCenturion 11 months ago
@SteamCenturion Yeah well Hitler was a facist, therefore he was right-wing. You cant however compare this to the Republicans or Tea Party. Still America does not need a new face, and a new slogan in politics, America needs a change of the system(my opinion)
101Politricks 11 months ago
@101Politricks HA! Laughable. Hitler was a Classical Republican, a Progressive leader, and a neo-Pagan. Fascism is by definition left wing, because it is classical republican, progressive, and neo-Pagan. Hitler gave Germany a new system. Before, it had a democratic republic, somewhat like ours. After his swift rise to power, he replaced it, like you would have us do, and in its place stood National Socialism, Liberalism distilled.
Conservativism isn't a new face, and its definitely not a slogan.
SteamCenturion 11 months ago
@SteamCenturion No, he wasnt left-wing. He hated the left, the first people who were inprisoned in his concentration camps were communists, socialists, and social democrats if they refused to join him. The Labour and Socialist International were a united left wing front in europe calling for joint action against Nazism and Hitler. The conservatives how ever joint Hitler no questions asked, because just like the reps hitler was pro-buisness. The reps in Gmany dont get over 5% today becz of it
101Politricks 11 months ago
@101Politricks
You are assuming that the left wing of Germany back then is nearly the same as the left wing of America today...
Because the issues of a different country in a different time would be the same as our issues of today??
Ever heard of Classical Liberalism? Classical Liberalism is very similar to Libertarian-Conservatism today.
Basically, German leftists of that time period != Contemporary American leftists.
hsew 9 months ago
@101Politricks You kid, right? Check your Nazi propaganda, they were against: Communists, Social Democrats, and... CAPITALISTS (yeah, somehow all three groups were in cahoots with the Jews and Freemasons). Hitler and the Nazis were against EVERYONE who wasnt them. They did promote "social programs" to get popularity and seized companies or controlled others (typically viewed as "leftist policies"). But in reality Nazism was on a path of its own, neither Liberal nor Conservative.
BeukendaalMason 9 months ago
@101Politricks Hitler hated Communists and Socialists, as well as social welfare (survival of the fittest afterall, his genocidal tendencies and whatnot) But he hated Capitalists even more. He hated having to work with them on Germany's industry, and as the war continued he increasingly had the state take over various parts of German industry. Hitler wasnt pro-buisness, he was pro-economic growth, which he believed couldnt come from individual people creating buisnesses.
GermanConquistador08 8 months ago
@101Politricks "The conservatives how ever joint Hitler no questions asked" - Many monarchist groups joined him, many nationalists groups joined him, but then again many workers joined him as well, fed up with socialist groups. But Conservatives? Nationalists and Monarchists mabye, but Capitalists and those in favor of Republic, NO! And most conservative groups were betrayed later. The monarchists were stabbed in the back for example. I'm sorry, your history is incorrect here.
GermanConquistador08 8 months ago
For all the Libs/Lefties in adding to Mason Weaver's statement: We had and continue to have a REAL war on poverty that actually works: It's called capitalism. Capitalism leads to the creation of wealth and brings wealth to even the lowest echelons of society. Even they are brought up through increasing wages, and benefits and greater opportunity. That comes w/freedom. Freedom & capitalism eliminate poverty. Gov has been a proven failure at all. That's reality, not your fantasies.
Aegius 11 months ago 3
@Aegius
Ok, you're so full of hot air... go back to your mansion and hire more illegal aliens to clean your house you corporate elitist teabagger LOL.
philip0460 11 months ago
@philip0460 Just vacuous insults. This is why I didn't bother watching your rants. You really just insult and provide no depth of thought. It's pathetic.
How about this for hot air: watch?v=iGdwsvj5k8Y
Yeah, those Lefties in WI were real peaceful! NOT!
Aegius 11 months ago
@philip0460 ON the Great Society of LBJ more than $3 trillion was spent. Did that alleviate poverty? No. IN fact BEFORE it was implemented poverty was going down by 0.5% per year. Then afterwards it remained steady. Gov programs don't work. The pursuit of profits leads to the creation of wealth and that includes the creation of jobs. That eliminates poverty. As Adam Smith stated, the pursuit of the common good or public good rarely really does any good. Pursuit of profit does far more good.
Aegius 11 months ago 16
@philip0460 Your use of the phrase "LOL" makes you sound juvenile, and it makes you look as if you think yourself incredibly witty. This makes you seem arrogant.
Of course, most of the Liberals I know are the types to live in those nice, fancy suburban neighborhoods that hire illegal aliens. I live in a somewhat run down neighborhood, where people do their own yardwork. Yet I have been slandered as a corporate elitist teabagger.
...LOL
SteamCenturion 11 months ago
klavin calling obama a left loony is somewhat hateful and incorrect. what has obama done that is leftist?
1samothrace77 11 months ago
hahahahahahahhaahha
thebamf100 11 months ago
13 communist democrats found this video
trexilll 11 months ago
What about that form of racism that men like you direct at the blacks in the form of shade-ism. Oh that's right, it doesn't exist... and thankfully it doesn't exist because hypocrisy stinks in the nostrils of both G-d and men.
knolram1 11 months ago
THIS GUY IN THIS VIDEO IS SO FULL OF SHIT IT HURTS. THERE IS WAY MUCH MORE RIGHT WING TEABAGGING HATRED OF PROGRESSIVES (i.e, Ann Coulter, Rush Limpballs, Hannity, Savage, Laura Ingraham... to name a few. And if you don't believe me just look at any video on YouTube with these idiots in it and you will see my point.
philip0460 1 year ago
@philip0460 You mean like the hate that the Progressives preach toward their opponents such as lumping them w/ Jared Loughner or employing SIXHIRB against them w/o any justification(Sexist, Islamophobic, Xenophobic, Homophobic, Intolerant, Racist, Bigoted) and using other means to shut them up. Real haters = the Left.
Aegius 1 year ago
@Aegius
Oh, yeah, and the American people really feel that way LOLOLOL
philip0460 1 year ago
@philip0460 Polls found most Americans favor Walker over the unions. Enough said.
Aegius 1 year ago
@Aegius
Yeah, you're right.... the Fox Snooze poll and the Rush Limpball poll LOLOL. The rightest wing poll, the Rasmussen Poll, has already proven you are a bold faced liar. MOST Americans are AGAINST the war on collective bargaining rights of working class people. Read a damn newspaper dude.
philip0460 1 year ago
@philip0460 I already responded. The collective bargaining is being limited, not eliminated. I actually am in favor of getting rid of public employee unions, b/c they enable public employees to work w/politicians toward taking whatever they want from the tax payer coffers. After all the "boss"(politicians) & unions are on the same side w/taxpayers on the other & unless tax payers raise Hell, they get screwed. Private employee unions don't have that prob as they are on opposite sides w/ the co.
Aegius 11 months ago
@philip0460 Most polls favor Walker over Unions. I have been reading up on this including the Rasmussen poll.
The state of WI is broke. Other states are broke and municipalities w/$3 trillion in debt thanks mainly due to ridiculously enormous pensions of public employee unions screwing over tax payers. The tax payers INCLUDE private sector employees & small businesses mainly and they have decided that enough is enough. It's time to fight back against the public employee union bullies.
Aegius 11 months ago
@Aegius
Again, you seem to be shooting yourself in the foot. First of all, the workers DID concede on lowering their salaries and benefits, but for some reason that's not enough. I would like to see the day, which will come if this idiot governor gets his way, where YOU the worker will also take a pay cut even in the private sector. You know why? Because once salaries are brought down, the private sector too will follow suit. So I hope you will enjoy working for $3.50 an hour w/o bennies
philip0460 11 months ago
@philip0460 Did I say that workers didn't concede at all? No. You are putting words in my mouth. I referred to further pensions and future means of salary and benefits. This has nothing to do w/the private sector as that is a negotiation between worker & management & market forces anyway. The private sector won't follow suit if salaries in the public sector is brought down, b/c market forces work w/private sector salaries and benefits, which the public sector doesn't.
Aegius 11 months ago
@philip0460 How many times did I say that workers made concessions? Go reread my posts. Apparently you need to review them. Next there won't be pay cuts in the private sector due to pay cuts in the public sector. Why? B/c there will be LESS taxes to pay & there is NO RELATION between the wage scale in the private sector via market forces vs the public sector of tax dollars. Wages & benefits improved w/o unions as the general rule as only 3% of workers were in unions in 1900.
Aegius 11 months ago
@Aegius
Well, to put an end to this... the governor is losing the war of public opinion. It won't be long till he will have to concede to the workers. So keep licking the ass of the rich... maybe there's something in it for you, who knows. But all I know is I'm a part of the American middle class and the people that matter to me are the workers of this country. So keep licking the rich people's butts cause I guarantee you they will screw you sooner or later. Bye.
philip0460 11 months ago
@philip0460 How is wealth created in a society? How are jobs created? Why was there no depression of the 1920's as there was of the 1930's? Why have businesses in droves fled from CA to nearby states and the Hollywood film industry moved to other states or to Canada?
How does a business function? How is it managed? How did former luxury items such as coffee, sugar, tea, paper, soap become cheap and common place? Where has gov ever made things cheaper and of better quality?
Aegius 11 months ago
@Aegius
Wealth is created when the MIDDLE CLASS has the money to actually buy the goods and services. Take money away from the middle class, and the country goes down the tubes! It's fact dude. I'm done with you. Please stop your idiotic bullshit. I hope and pray you get a huge pay cut... oh, and please don't cry about it. Once the unions are cut out, the bar will be lowered and companies will cut YOUR salary and YOUR benefits. Get and damn education. DON'T REPLY TO THIS PLEASE.
philip0460 11 months ago
@philip0460 Wrong. Wealth is created when products are created via profits. The Middle class buys when wages are paid to them as part of the costs that are covered to ensure such profits. Purchasing doesn't create wealth, but expends wealth. Selling creates wealth AFTER the products are produced. Purchasing doesn't cause the creation of products, but the profit motive does. & BTW, I repeatedly have responded to you about how cuts in wages in the public sector have NOTHING to do w/private sector.
Aegius 11 months ago
@Aegius
Person A has 10 chips, Person B has 2 chips, and Person 3 and 1 chip. A car costs 4 chips. Who gets to buy the car? LOL What a moron. If you don't have money you don't buy. Why is that so hard to understand. During the Bush era he cut taxes enormously for the corporations... how many jobs were created? ZERO. Nobody had money to buy them... except the richer people
philip0460 11 months ago
@philip0460 Actually unemployment plummetted to around 5% under Bush after taxes were lowerred. and that is despite the 2 wars. Unemployment really only increased AFTER Pelosi & the Dems took over in 2007. The same occurred under Reagan, Harding & Coolidge.
Entrepreneurs in fact have sought to make products cheaper, so they will work to get Person 3 & Person 2 to purchase more easily w/cheaper techniques. That happened w/sugar, coffee, paper, soap and other formerly luxury items.
Aegius 11 months ago
@Aegius
Well, once Person 2 and Person 3 can make a living wage and purchase items they need instead of giving tax breaks to the ones who really don't need it, then we will get back on track. I hope the message from the people of Wisconsin echoes across this country. Well, of course, minus Texas and Oklahoma LOL
philip0460 11 months ago
@philip0460 When the "rich" get their tax breaks, they can HIRE more people including Person 2 & 3 and provide them w/their wages for more spending power. Oh, & the "rich" can find ways of making products cheaper so that Person 2 & 3 can afford them more easily. That occurred w/former luxury items such as paper, sugar, coffee, tea & steel. BTW, please name me 1 item that gov made cheaper & of better quality?
Aegius 11 months ago
@Aegius
Ok. Again playing devil's advocate. Ok we lowered taxes on the rich. Now we need to fund a war, fix roads, fund education, help the poor, etc.? Where do we get the money? Oh, I know! The middle class LOL
philip0460 11 months ago
@philip0460 cont... Clarification. That is unemployment plummetted under Reagan, Coolidge & Harding after massive tax cuts on the highest brackets occurred. Increasing taxes on the "rich" really just causes them to seek tax shelters and loopholes as occurred in the 1930's, after WII and in later periods. Revenues plummetted and the economy sufferred from diminishing activity. That is what really occurs w/taxes.
Aegius 11 months ago
@Aegius
Ok. Let me play devil's advocate. How do you propose to raise federal revenue? Let's just tax the middle class and remove taxes from the rich. Then the United States will be like a banana republic with VEEEEEEEEEEEEERY rich people and VEEEEEEEEEEEEERY poor people. Would that please you? What a damn fool! Laslty, aren't you in the middle class? What do you do for a living? I will bet you aren't a laborer, work in Walmart, or have a public sector job LOL.
philip0460 11 months ago
@philip0460 Did I say just tax the MC & remove taxes from the rich? No. I said cutting taxes on the rich AND I'll add the MC as well. Lower taxes has consistently led to higher revenues. Go do your research on the Harding/Coolidge cuts, JFK cuts & Reagan cuts. You keep distorting what I stated and ignoring actual facts. You also didn't answer most of my ?s: Why was there no Depression of the 1920's unilke 1930's. 1921: Unemployment 11%, Inflation 20%. That was WORSE than 1930, 1980, & 2008.
Aegius 11 months ago
@Aegius
You haven't answered my questions AT ALL!!!! Are you dense or slow or what? I asked you HOW DO YOU EXPECT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO ATTAIN REVENUE BY LOWERING TAXES ON THE RICH? WHERE DOES THE MONEY COME FROM? DOES IT TRICKLE UP TO THE FEDERAL GOV'T? lol
philip0460 11 months ago
@philip0460 I have answered your ?. Lowering taxes INCREASES economic activity and that ironically leads to increase in revenue. That has worked consistently in the 1920s, 1960's, 1980's & early 2000s. Increase in economic activity produces an increase in revenue.
You really don't listen. It's pathetic. BTW, we had private education in most of out history & 56% of roads in Italy are private. State of IN has privatized its roads too. Help poor? Let non profit charities do that. Gov sux at it.
Aegius 11 months ago
@Aegius
Are you avoiding my question on purpose or are you so afflicted with tunnel vision that you don't hear what you don't want to hear? How do we fund the FEDERAL government? Does the private sector send money to the federal government?
philip0460 11 months ago
@philip0460 I ANSWERED YOU SEVERAL TIMES. Here it is: 1)Lowering taxes INCREASES revenue. 2)How? By increasing economic activity. That increase in economic activity INCREASES revenue to the fed gov & other govs. 3)Yes, that has worked consistently under Harding, Coolidge, LBJ(per JFK tax cuts), Reagan & Bush '43. Go read on Andrew Mellon from the Harding admin. Go read on the Laffer Curve from Arthur Laffer. The Laffer curve has consistently proven correct. cont...
Aegius 11 months ago
@Aegius
Ok. Lowering taxes on corporations to a normal person would indicate there would be less revenue to the federal government.
philip0460 11 months ago
@philip0460 Who pays for taxes on corporations? Not corporations. Answer: Corporations just pass on such taxes to consumers. Meaning consumers or the "middle class" or "working class" pays for the corporate taxes. That means increase in prices too. Increases in prices means less demand and less sales, which means less revenue for the government.
I referred to individual incomes anyway, not corporate taxes.
Aegius 11 months ago