this piece of shit scanner if we can call it that, it sucks balls, the color is off and im pretty much having to fix every picture that i scan with it...
you are just better of buying a scanner for digitizing your pictures, avoid this piece junk and just scan them....
this is retarded... why not just use a regular scanner? at first when i saw a picture of it i thought u could just stack your pictures in there and run it and it would sift through them scanning them. now THAT would be cool. who the hell wants to stand there putting each picture in a plastic frame and scan them? that would take FOREVER with the hundreds of pictures i have. you have to do way more than "just the push a button." sounds like regular scanning is more convenient
this looks like it'd take way longer than using a scanner... now what'd be cool is if you could load a stack of pictures in and it scan through them all like a copy machine would... without having to reload every time. i have hundreds of pics to input and this just doesn't seem like it's very time effective.
this is really awesome... but 99% of people today keep their pics on their Laptops, Desktops, Phones, Mp3 players , Digital Picture frames and on profiles....
This does exactly the same as a scanner except you have to slot the photos into frame things before putting them in the scanner...
Does that make it more difficult to scan old photos in. Plus what if you don't have the right sized frame thing for it. A lot of old photos are square or a different size than the ones we have today.
I agree why not just get a regular scanner it might not be 5 megapixels but I doubt that really matters unless you're a fanatic. Plus a scanner can fit anysize photo.
Well I can understand that but you can just edit them on the computer and re-scanning something never takes that long really. It just seems like this is a bigger, bulkier and less flexible (in what it can do) version of a scanner.
These type devices are VERY useful. Let's face it - paper photos are limited in their durability. Once you have it in digital, you'll ALWAYS have a beautiful photo (as long as you back up your saved file). It's good to see a device that does it well and does it fast.
this piece of shit scanner if we can call it that, it sucks balls, the color is off and im pretty much having to fix every picture that i scan with it...
you are just better of buying a scanner for digitizing your pictures, avoid this piece junk and just scan them....
taztwin2 1 year ago
this is retarded... why not just use a regular scanner? at first when i saw a picture of it i thought u could just stack your pictures in there and run it and it would sift through them scanning them. now THAT would be cool. who the hell wants to stand there putting each picture in a plastic frame and scan them? that would take FOREVER with the hundreds of pictures i have. you have to do way more than "just the push a button." sounds like regular scanning is more convenient
jo0mee 2 years ago
This device is a piece of junk.
It only works right with non-glossy photos.
The photos sometimes *fall into the device* so that you have to disassemble it to get them back.
The color is always off, usually shifted more toward blue or brown.
There is no support for 64-bit systems.
It has a very limited range of compatible image sizes.
I have not seen a single positive review from any consumer who owns this - only from paid reviewers.
AVOID this piece of garbage.
FreePlay 2 years ago
buy a flatbed you posers
sickboy932 2 years ago
this looks like it'd take way longer than using a scanner... now what'd be cool is if you could load a stack of pictures in and it scan through them all like a copy machine would... without having to reload every time. i have hundreds of pics to input and this just doesn't seem like it's very time effective.
amandapace7 2 years ago
dude... why did this video have a thumbnail from one of my videos at the time of this comment post?
PRODVDi 3 years ago
BAUER EXPLODED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TerraRyzer 3 years ago
it's cute =P
LETHLSS 3 years ago
wow, I wonder what 1800 dpi digital photos of dust look like. roflol
chimera15 3 years ago 2
cool never heard of somthing like this before
gbfgeneralbluefreak 3 years ago
this is really awesome... but 99% of people today keep their pics on their Laptops, Desktops, Phones, Mp3 players , Digital Picture frames and on profiles....
atlaschooty 3 years ago 3
Please someone correct me if I'm wrong...
This does exactly the same as a scanner except you have to slot the photos into frame things before putting them in the scanner...
Does that make it more difficult to scan old photos in. Plus what if you don't have the right sized frame thing for it. A lot of old photos are square or a different size than the ones we have today.
I can't see why anyone would want one....
parkourpeter112 3 years ago 8
I agree why not just get a regular scanner it might not be 5 megapixels but I doubt that really matters unless you're a fanatic. Plus a scanner can fit anysize photo.
silentkills123 3 years ago 4
It keeps them aligned so that when you scan them, they aren't at an angle so you won't have to re-scan.
guest2424 3 years ago
Oh I see.
Well I can understand that but you can just edit them on the computer and re-scanning something never takes that long really. It just seems like this is a bigger, bulkier and less flexible (in what it can do) version of a scanner.
PS: I'm not trying to argue with you lol :)
parkourpeter112 3 years ago 3
i agree
guest2424 3 years ago
These type devices are VERY useful. Let's face it - paper photos are limited in their durability. Once you have it in digital, you'll ALWAYS have a beautiful photo (as long as you back up your saved file). It's good to see a device that does it well and does it fast.
VideoGuyNC 3 years ago
cool
cjdirectblog123 3 years ago
kinda big tho but nice
brianchris4 3 years ago
true, but at least it can hopefully do the job.
GmanProductionz1337 3 years ago
whey not first
GmanProductionz1337 3 years ago
this is ment to be a windup to the retards who try to get first
GmanProductionz1337 3 years ago
o i c
XboxEliteMan 3 years ago