At 00:35 we see why it makes sense that WTC building 7 fell straight down at free fall acceleration through the path of greatest resistance. Nothing to see here people. Go back to watching American Idol.
@lilgangstabowwow 1) In WTC rubble, chunks of concrete and metal fused together were found (aka "meteorite"). This shows conclusively that metal was melted. Conventional fires do not burn hot enough to melt steel.
2) Nano thermite found in the dust from WTC's; findings published in peer reviewed scientific journal (google scholar search: thermitic materials 9/11)
see how in just about all of these they blow EVERY floor out for whichever direction they want the building to fall and THEN it falls... that's not what happened on the WTC... the WTC was not a controlled explosion, conspiracy ppl get a life.
@rasonage because your first statement(that in every one of theses they blow EVERY floor out...)
is so stupid and wrong im going to assume evry thing else you say is wrong as well. if you cant say something factual about a 2 min video that you just watched, how reliable can you be about something that happened 8 years ago and you didnt even see?
@Slavestorms Lol I know right? These demolitions are exactly like 9/11. And an aluminum air plain with a poorly flamable fuel could not have made a 180 story building designed specifically to counter fires collapse at almost free fall speed. It's absurd that this could happen.
@sim2lew The plane went inside the side not threw the hole core structure. If the fuel did it the top of the building and a small amount below the explosion would have fell.
@NCC17O1Q The plane destroys pat of the side and enters the tower. Fire takes hold. Metal fatigues. Top falls THROUGH rest of building. Building collapses completely. END OF STORY. These demolitions were nothing like the WTC attacks, because they were controlled, and charges were places near the bottoms. Now please, be quiet.
@sim2lew As you said the demolitions in this video were caused by charges placed at the BOTTOM. An ALUMINUM plane with a type fuel that only generates fires at about 1500 DEGREES C at the TOP of the building wouldn't have brought the whole thing down. And the top didn't fall threw the building, the bottom gave out. Please explain.
@NCC17O1Q I saw the whole thing unfold. The plane has momentum, it has the energy to get into the building. it destroys some of the metal, so the rest is under more stress, so fire burning would be catastrophic. If you re-watch some videos from the collapse, you see the top of the building disappear into the cloud of smoke, and then the rest of the building falls below. Just because you say a plane wouldn't bring down a building, well, IT DID. Live with it.
@sim2lew The one side of the top building was the only part that was damaged. If anything were to happen the the building the opposite side the top would have given out and the top would have fell off side ways. And even that is unprobable I know this from the designer of the WTC. It would take about 3-4 planes to bring those buildings down the way they did. Understand? THE BUILDINGS WERE ENGINEERED WITH THE STRUCTUAL INTEGRITY TO HOLD UP. Except the fact your government doesn't care about you.
@NCC17O1Q Err, I'm not American. WTC was fatigued. The plane[s] took out many columns, so weight was put on different supports. The fire took hold, and then the metal got warm, so became more malleable, so started to change shape, losing strength. The top then fell inwards, and the 'pancake effect' took hold. Try looking at some cited websites explaining what happened. Now, please, understand that bringing down flat blocks is not terrorism.
@sim2lew I'm going to have to agree with you. While looking for a video for you to watch, I came into contact with a video I've never thought could be so persuasive. somebody debunking all these theories. The evidence is overwhelming and extremely convincing. I can't argue with it. My apologies if I wasted your time.
@sim2lew - The WTC was taken down on purpose. There's no way that one airplane at the top of such a huge, structurally sound building could take down a building, and so perfectly straight down. To have that happen twice? Then what about the WTC 7 building that wasn't even hit by anything, coming down perfectly straight. We don't know who did it, but that was planned.
@BayviewFinch Errm, no. Stop going on about that. So many people died, and all the sick, twisted idiots like you want to believe is that someone planned it. I HAVE NEWS FOR YOU, SOMEONE DID PLAN IT. THE TERRORISTS WHO FLEW INTO THE BUILDING PLANNED IT. THEY HIT IT IN THE RIGHT PLACE TO BRING IT DOWN. I now want to ask you why you want to worry about that so much. It happened in the past. The WTC did come down from the plane strikes, it's called the pancake effect. Gravity pulls things down.
@sim2lew - We will not stop. That's what happens when there's a huge injustice like that. People are relentless. Even the architects of the WTC agree that it would be impossible for a crash like that to take down a tower. Just look at the scale of it. Sure, a jet is huge, but it's tiny compared to the whole building. Build a lego tower to scale and throw a little airplane at it with all your might. See what happens. Also, what about Air Traffic Control and the U.S. Air Force?
@sim2lew - I was watching the event unfold on CNN. That the air force weren't sent in is very suspicious. They just didn't notice that two jets were flying low over Manhattan, a huge population centre, at building level? And how do you explain Building 7? It wasn't even hit by a plane, yet it conveniently fell straight down, demolition-style, without harming any of the nearby buildings. LOL.
@BayviewFinch What did you want the air force to do? Also, note that there were airports nearby. No, ok, maybe it was the CIA or someone else, but you cannot doubt that whoever it was knew what they were doing. The plane hit 1/3 of the way down. Steel burns. the plane was full of fuel. The top of the building went through the rest. Whoever took down the WTC towers did so with a plane. I saw it on the news too, you know.
@sim2lew - So you're telling me that the world's most powerful military wasn't even able to spot 2 jets heading towards buildings in Manhattan and do something about it? You've normally got air traffic controllers who will notice the slightest infractions of air space. Military fighters are supposedly trained to respond in seconds. You see them scramble when a 2-seater Cessna flies into restricted airspace. It's very suspicious that there was no interception of the jets, at least the second.
@BayviewFinch There is something, that a top offical for first time in history took control of air-space and said it was ok for the planes to be there...Truth. Was in a documentary.
@sim2lew - There were 3 towers that went down. Only 2 were hit by planes. 3 buildings fell straight down. You really need to catch up on things. It's as if you haven't even watched the basics of basics, Farenheit 9/11. There's plenty more info. out there too. Just look. How does a relatively small plane take down a building? It doesn't. Explosives take down a building. Very carefully planned explosives, along with cutting support beams at very specific points in the building.
@BayviewFinch You seem to have forgotten that planes have fuel, fuel burns and surprisingly enough, so does steel. I'm not saying the government didn't plan it, I'm also not saying they did. What I am saying is that those planes took out the twin towers. They went in 1/3 of the way down from the top, they weakened the structure, then the top of the building fell down through the rest due to gravity. How the other buildings collapsed is a mystery, but the twin towers were brought down by planes.
@rasonage You're a sheep. It's scientifically absurd that an aluminum plane with a poorly flamable fuel could have collapsed two 180 story buildings specifically designed to counter fires and impact at a near free fall speed with 2 m wide steel core support beams with a melt temperature of at least 3500 degrees C (7032 F). Do your research. If an air plane brought a building down it would have fallen sideways, not collapsed in a perfect line at free fall speed.
@JetSetForLife Sometimes the soil under the building gets instable, so building becomes dangerous. There were cases when multi-million brand new buildings had to be destroyed.
@JetSetForLife Well yes, the buildings might have had structural problems like one sky scraper was sinking into the ground very very very slowly but they cought that and there was nothing else to do and they destroyed it. You sir, need to do your research
High rise demolitions pretty much look the same all over the world. Very few are brought down with such precision so the foundation walls remain intact. An incendiary mixture called 'thermite" or thermate is used to cut opposing angles across steel girders. Edward Louis Bernays (1891-1995) had said that by 2001, most people will not think for themselves. They will simply believe whatever they are told on television. No math, physics, documentary of photographic evidence will make any difference.
I can read that. But in a contracting universe (our universe is expanding and that's why time goes "forward") your shit comes up from the WC and enters your bowels and your food comes up from your stomach and onto the plate.
This sort of life will take a lot of getting use to when it happens.
But people in an contracting universe will be hard put to imagine otherwise. Why? They say, do people not enter the world coming out from the earth and grow younger until into the mother's womb?
Imagine in a universe when time goes backwards. The Twin Towers and Building 7 will rise again from the ashes. People will rise from the dead and live their lives until they are born into their mothers' womb. We will all talk backwards
Keep pressing 4
madtvll 2 days ago
Thumbs up if 0:51 was Sherlock Holmes 2 ! :) :)
indu111 2 weeks ago
Hope there was NEVER a time someone was in there =)
Eyeglompyou 4 weeks ago
this is what happens when you piss off the land lord!!
scarrel77 1 month ago
see, this is what happens when u dont pay your rent!
scarrel77 1 month ago
don't ya just watching shit get demolished!
Sexyfatman21 1 month ago
Comment removed
atmoferebusandfucku 1 month ago
I've forgett to take my wallet from this building... Fuck...
dariusz34 2 months ago
They fall apart like lego, very cool :D
karlwhitfield13 2 months ago
00:40 is that wat i think it is... A NUCLEAR PLANT!!!!!!!
lyricsmyrics 2 months ago
I've seen two other buildings fall just like this... New York, September 11th
MBJB07 2 months ago
damn it chuck norris! be careful!
STEVETZAG 3 months ago
1:33
Kurky68 3 months ago
1:31 disgusting (perverted people only knows)...:D
FuJi1616 3 months ago 8
@FuJi1616
Does this mean i'm a pervert?
Fuck.
Turtan4 2 months ago
0:12 chuck norris farts hardly
TheSegabros 3 months ago
0:06 they are happy because they demolished a building built with their own money
Zip2461996 3 months ago
last chimney, smoke stack was best
MichiganFann 3 months ago
0:54 is just a perfect demolition
LisaJJMerry 3 months ago
stupid commersials
Are44441 3 months ago
1:05 + bye bye city?? :O
xasapak0s 4 months ago
Fucking AD at youtube!!!
PraKroo 4 months ago
humans waste so much shelter >.< why cant we turn those empty buildings into shelters for the homeless :D
HOBOS FTW
XMagicStar 4 months ago
what is this? Super Mario?
immakickyourass 4 months ago
does 9/11 ring belling with these implosions?
GayBoyRunning 4 months ago
@GayBoyRunning no, not really.
1Gabrielsson1 3 months ago
@1Gabrielsson1 Then i guess your intelligence can not compare the differents then?
GayBoyRunning 3 months ago
@GayBoyRunning ah so you are a person that must insult people if they do not think the same as you do, very mature of you.
1Gabrielsson1 3 months ago
@1Gabrielsson1 No i guess you dont see what other that know the truth behind the lies.
GayBoyRunning 3 months ago
At 1.30 is like me smoking after lunch :)
tronderbart99 4 months ago
0:29 i literally thought for 1 sec that the building actually bounced back...:O
M01Z4T1F 4 months ago
hate it when u reverse the clips just make it understandable that u didnt have enough clips to show
Givemesongs 4 months ago
1:31 Wow !
Gametictac 4 months ago 2
@IAwzm ikr
vanhecke0productions 4 months ago
If you watch this video backwards , it looks like vacuums rebuilding theirselves and suck the dust XD
AMD587 4 months ago
Awsome demolitions, i wonder if any one left any key car or any pet in there :P do u imagine? "Hey dude, nice demolition, have you seen my cat?"
choalejo 4 months ago
I dont see the twin towers ???
zzzzguner 4 months ago
@zzzzguner that wasn't a fucking demolition you piece of shit
auzzy4250 4 months ago
GODZILLA DID IT
jacksondarksonic 4 months ago
Damn it's like watching the trailer of a Michael Bay movie.
vickyr9909 5 months ago 19
Roach! clean this shit up!
McSoccerplayer18 5 months ago
@McSoccerplayer18 i think you mean Ramirez! clean this up! lol
RazorX53 4 months ago
@RazorX53, haha yea
McSoccerplayer18 4 months ago
1:34 big bong
ProRiko 5 months ago
1:30 - 1:39 reminds me of what happens when I see recent Lindsey Lohan pictures :/
goodygoody23 5 months ago
0:46 fail! 0:50 Double FAIL!
robi943 5 months ago
YES! we got a bonus :D (0:41)
pirre97 5 months ago
Am I the only one who thought at 0:06 "okay....START RUNNING!"
MontajBlaze 5 months ago
1:34 smoke ring xD
GeNoCaYd 6 months ago
@GeNoCaYd more like mushroom cloud :D
thabest007 5 months ago
Last one was sweet
cam0kool23 6 months ago
THE HUMANITY... o.o
Nicolettaax33 6 months ago
1:31 , Mushrooms :)
TheZupahMan 6 months ago
Destroy the objective!
duckguy4000 6 months ago
0.22 please dont tell me that thoughs two structures were flats people lived in. what the hell were people thinking in the 60s to 70s?
propjam2 6 months ago
OMFG im pretty sure the second one was in 1000 ways to die when the crackheads blew up;]
CrazyKayKay111 6 months ago
Oh my God! Spongebob is back in town!
Thecookienator1023 6 months ago
brb wasting money
DefensorsPacis 7 months ago
rixto hliaaaaaaaaa
xwmenos 7 months ago
28...29...30! Ready or not here I come! Man, these buildings are good at hiding!
megaomg1 9 months ago
FUCK YEAH!!!!!!!!!!
MASERKH 9 months ago
I can find a job to the teorrists, They can make this job so good, exellent job instead of exploding good buildings
TMBlackCat 9 months ago
1:02 quickest way to evict lazy unwanted tenants.
Secundinius 9 months ago
At 00:35 we see why it makes sense that WTC building 7 fell straight down at free fall acceleration through the path of greatest resistance. Nothing to see here people. Go back to watching American Idol.
152czar 9 months ago
@152czar you sir, are a douchebag.
lilgangstabowwow 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lilgangstabowwow 1) In WTC rubble, chunks of concrete and metal fused together were found (aka "meteorite"). This shows conclusively that metal was melted. Conventional fires do not burn hot enough to melt steel.
2) Nano thermite found in the dust from WTC's; findings published in peer reviewed scientific journal (google scholar search: thermitic materials 9/11)
3) Investigate 9/11! THUMBS UP if you agree!
152czar 9 months ago
imagine, that they destroy the "Burdsch Chalifa"- building in Dubai! xD
ljuskas 9 months ago
what is the name of the building at 00:54
Are44441 10 months ago
haha the smoke stack was still doing its job even to its was being demolished
pyrodownhiller 10 months ago
Holy crap dude, let them fall all the way before cutting to the next clip... X.X
pyr0static 11 months ago
gods playing himself a awesome game of jenga
Anguillaboy55 11 months ago
shouldn't the trade towers be in this video? =/
CobaltSpieder777 11 months ago
I like the fail 0:22
Tomtheprodigy 11 months ago
I liked the bit where the building fell down
jpalongo 1 year ago
you made it really exciting & fun, love the reverse segments- awesome!
leapingoutofwater 1 year ago
woah did anyone else notice the buildings rebuild itself at 0:27?
bwsSynik 1 year ago
adds
jimmyvbs 1 year ago
Cool music.
RandomStuff1O1 1 year ago
SEPTEMBER 11 TWIN TOWERS DESTROYNG = DEMOLITION
Izotopzx 1 year ago
@Izotopzx no
glitchbreaker 1 year ago
wooow 1:30
misikeh12 1 year ago
wooow
misikeh12 1 year ago
now clean this all up
Veksler96 1 year ago 34
I'm just wondering what the reason is for the gay music?
BayviewFinch 1 year ago
oh god the grey bar is back!
loginlover 1 year ago
1:30 Lookes great
oOHoodooManOo 1 year ago
terorist attack ooooohhhhh nnnnoooooooooooooo.fuck you all.
tegarac 1 year ago
it looks as if they're made of cardboards when they fell
pondypoo 1 year ago
0:55 that reminded me the dark knight
BubuSnow93 1 year ago
haha 0:30 FAIL
theschmidtjulian 1 year ago
very nice video! =)
Shpinatio 1 year ago
where's WTC?
DVAFP 1 year ago
I'd have to say this is one of my favorite gametypes on Modern Warfare 2
SaxaphoneTy 1 year ago
The tower at the end was smoking its last weed.
XGnee 1 year ago
@XGnee Smoke rings and all.
chuckles1125 1 year ago
there is no doubt that the smoke stack at the end was the coolest
warlordx25 1 year ago
最後の煙突の、ナイス!
PONTA0312 1 year ago
uh that was meh house why did u destroy it im gonna sue u
flame623 1 year ago
Puerto Rico still holds the world record for most demolitions at once.
MagikJoe77469 1 year ago
omg! all those buildings fell down!
megatron2000z 1 year ago
the last explosion is funny there comes a mushroom cloud out of the tower
miljaardetedju 1 year ago 2
looks to me like wtc 7
ryanwilliammac 1 year ago
no building 7? phooey
ADIM3N 1 year ago
see how in just about all of these they blow EVERY floor out for whichever direction they want the building to fall and THEN it falls... that's not what happened on the WTC... the WTC was not a controlled explosion, conspiracy ppl get a life.
rasonage 1 year ago
@rasonage because your first statement(that in every one of theses they blow EVERY floor out...)
is so stupid and wrong im going to assume evry thing else you say is wrong as well. if you cant say something factual about a 2 min video that you just watched, how reliable can you be about something that happened 8 years ago and you didnt even see?
ADIM3N 1 year ago 2
American Behavioral Scientist vol. 53 No.6 Feb 2010
Why people are too stupid to recognize 9/11 as a SCAD, State Crime Against Democracy, and the implications for these stupid people
Slavestorms 1 year ago
@Slavestorms Lol I know right? These demolitions are exactly like 9/11. And an aluminum air plain with a poorly flamable fuel could not have made a 180 story building designed specifically to counter fires collapse at almost free fall speed. It's absurd that this could happen.
NCC17O1Q 1 year ago
@NCC17O1Q This was nothing like 9/11, because these were controlled demolitions. Please stop saying things like that. 9/11 was a terrorist attack.
sim2lew 1 year ago
@sim2lew The plane went inside the side not threw the hole core structure. If the fuel did it the top of the building and a small amount below the explosion would have fell.
NCC17O1Q 1 year ago
@NCC17O1Q The plane destroys pat of the side and enters the tower. Fire takes hold. Metal fatigues. Top falls THROUGH rest of building. Building collapses completely. END OF STORY. These demolitions were nothing like the WTC attacks, because they were controlled, and charges were places near the bottoms. Now please, be quiet.
sim2lew 1 year ago
@sim2lew As you said the demolitions in this video were caused by charges placed at the BOTTOM. An ALUMINUM plane with a type fuel that only generates fires at about 1500 DEGREES C at the TOP of the building wouldn't have brought the whole thing down. And the top didn't fall threw the building, the bottom gave out. Please explain.
NCC17O1Q 1 year ago
@NCC17O1Q I saw the whole thing unfold. The plane has momentum, it has the energy to get into the building. it destroys some of the metal, so the rest is under more stress, so fire burning would be catastrophic. If you re-watch some videos from the collapse, you see the top of the building disappear into the cloud of smoke, and then the rest of the building falls below. Just because you say a plane wouldn't bring down a building, well, IT DID. Live with it.
sim2lew 1 year ago
@sim2lew The one side of the top building was the only part that was damaged. If anything were to happen the the building the opposite side the top would have given out and the top would have fell off side ways. And even that is unprobable I know this from the designer of the WTC. It would take about 3-4 planes to bring those buildings down the way they did. Understand? THE BUILDINGS WERE ENGINEERED WITH THE STRUCTUAL INTEGRITY TO HOLD UP. Except the fact your government doesn't care about you.
NCC17O1Q 1 year ago
@NCC17O1Q Err, I'm not American. WTC was fatigued. The plane[s] took out many columns, so weight was put on different supports. The fire took hold, and then the metal got warm, so became more malleable, so started to change shape, losing strength. The top then fell inwards, and the 'pancake effect' took hold. Try looking at some cited websites explaining what happened. Now, please, understand that bringing down flat blocks is not terrorism.
sim2lew 1 year ago
@sim2lew I'm going to have to agree with you. While looking for a video for you to watch, I came into contact with a video I've never thought could be so persuasive. somebody debunking all these theories. The evidence is overwhelming and extremely convincing. I can't argue with it. My apologies if I wasted your time.
NCC17O1Q 1 year ago
@NCC17O1Q Sorry if I'm wrong, but was that sarcastic?
sim2lew 1 year ago
@sim2lew No.
NCC17O1Q 1 year ago
@sim2lew - The WTC was taken down on purpose. There's no way that one airplane at the top of such a huge, structurally sound building could take down a building, and so perfectly straight down. To have that happen twice? Then what about the WTC 7 building that wasn't even hit by anything, coming down perfectly straight. We don't know who did it, but that was planned.
BayviewFinch 1 year ago
@BayviewFinch Errm, no. Stop going on about that. So many people died, and all the sick, twisted idiots like you want to believe is that someone planned it. I HAVE NEWS FOR YOU, SOMEONE DID PLAN IT. THE TERRORISTS WHO FLEW INTO THE BUILDING PLANNED IT. THEY HIT IT IN THE RIGHT PLACE TO BRING IT DOWN. I now want to ask you why you want to worry about that so much. It happened in the past. The WTC did come down from the plane strikes, it's called the pancake effect. Gravity pulls things down.
sim2lew 1 year ago
@sim2lew - We will not stop. That's what happens when there's a huge injustice like that. People are relentless. Even the architects of the WTC agree that it would be impossible for a crash like that to take down a tower. Just look at the scale of it. Sure, a jet is huge, but it's tiny compared to the whole building. Build a lego tower to scale and throw a little airplane at it with all your might. See what happens. Also, what about Air Traffic Control and the U.S. Air Force?
BayviewFinch 1 year ago
@sim2lew - I was watching the event unfold on CNN. That the air force weren't sent in is very suspicious. They just didn't notice that two jets were flying low over Manhattan, a huge population centre, at building level? And how do you explain Building 7? It wasn't even hit by a plane, yet it conveniently fell straight down, demolition-style, without harming any of the nearby buildings. LOL.
BayviewFinch 1 year ago
@BayviewFinch What did you want the air force to do? Also, note that there were airports nearby. No, ok, maybe it was the CIA or someone else, but you cannot doubt that whoever it was knew what they were doing. The plane hit 1/3 of the way down. Steel burns. the plane was full of fuel. The top of the building went through the rest. Whoever took down the WTC towers did so with a plane. I saw it on the news too, you know.
sim2lew 1 year ago
@sim2lew - So you're telling me that the world's most powerful military wasn't even able to spot 2 jets heading towards buildings in Manhattan and do something about it? You've normally got air traffic controllers who will notice the slightest infractions of air space. Military fighters are supposedly trained to respond in seconds. You see them scramble when a 2-seater Cessna flies into restricted airspace. It's very suspicious that there was no interception of the jets, at least the second.
BayviewFinch 1 year ago
@BayviewFinch There is something, that a top offical for first time in history took control of air-space and said it was ok for the planes to be there...Truth. Was in a documentary.
Tilyard123456 1 year ago
@sim2lew - There were 3 towers that went down. Only 2 were hit by planes. 3 buildings fell straight down. You really need to catch up on things. It's as if you haven't even watched the basics of basics, Farenheit 9/11. There's plenty more info. out there too. Just look. How does a relatively small plane take down a building? It doesn't. Explosives take down a building. Very carefully planned explosives, along with cutting support beams at very specific points in the building.
BayviewFinch 1 year ago
@BayviewFinch You seem to have forgotten that planes have fuel, fuel burns and surprisingly enough, so does steel. I'm not saying the government didn't plan it, I'm also not saying they did. What I am saying is that those planes took out the twin towers. They went in 1/3 of the way down from the top, they weakened the structure, then the top of the building fell down through the rest due to gravity. How the other buildings collapsed is a mystery, but the twin towers were brought down by planes.
sim2lew 1 year ago
@sim2lew - That "mystery" of the other building falling down is also part of the mystery of the two main towers falling down.
BayviewFinch 1 year ago
@BayviewFinch And of course there's no such thing as Debris.
sim2lew 1 year ago
@rasonage You're a sheep. It's scientifically absurd that an aluminum plane with a poorly flamable fuel could have collapsed two 180 story buildings specifically designed to counter fires and impact at a near free fall speed with 2 m wide steel core support beams with a melt temperature of at least 3500 degrees C (7032 F). Do your research. If an air plane brought a building down it would have fallen sideways, not collapsed in a perfect line at free fall speed.
NCC17O1Q 1 year ago
@NCC17O1Q Do you not understand? PLANE IS FULL OF FUEL. FUEL GOES EVERYWHERE. FUEL BURNS. STRUCTURE WEAKENS. TOP FALLS THROUGH REST OF BUILDING!
sim2lew 1 year ago
awesome...thanks for the post!
timbershell2 1 year ago
1:34 :))
otrovi1998 2 years ago 42
00:53 COOOOOL :O
gilzeinho 2 years ago
Did anyone else notice some of the buildings looked practically new?
JetSetForLife 2 years ago 90
Yeah i've always been thinking that too!!!!
jrao1000 2 years ago
I think they clean it Beforee
Thoughtt.. =P!
maux999 2 years ago
@JetSetForLife Sometimes the soil under the building gets instable, so building becomes dangerous. There were cases when multi-million brand new buildings had to be destroyed.
Esthreel 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JetSetForLife keyword= looked
averagepatriot 1 year ago
@JetSetForLife
demolition includes destroying some buildings whom were newly built but had a major design fail ..
Nimitzkillers5 1 year ago
@JetSetForLife asbest and so on
MrUniQat 9 months ago
@JetSetForLife Well yes, the buildings might have had structural problems like one sky scraper was sinking into the ground very very very slowly but they cought that and there was nothing else to do and they destroyed it. You sir, need to do your research
benry200 7 months ago
@benry200 I don't need to because 1 year later someone like you will explain it to me. :)
JetSetForLife 7 months ago
@JetSetForLife like at 0:54, it had a banner on it advertising it's completion wtf?
roloug95 6 months ago
:23 Massive!
KnightHero22 2 years ago
High rise demolitions pretty much look the same all over the world. Very few are brought down with such precision so the foundation walls remain intact. An incendiary mixture called 'thermite" or thermate is used to cut opposing angles across steel girders. Edward Louis Bernays (1891-1995) had said that by 2001, most people will not think for themselves. They will simply believe whatever they are told on television. No math, physics, documentary of photographic evidence will make any difference.
abacab987 2 years ago
where are the airplanes?
0000romano 2 years ago
thank you for the patronih i should say ty
snapywrist 2 years ago
the last one was so epic it was awsome
greavesscoots 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Looks like WTC 7!
QuickSixx 2 years ago
the best one was 0:42
BYE BYE FACTORY :P
TheKittyPenguin 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
im glad when i see when thay destroy the power plants!it means mor windmales less smoke
StatueOfLibertyKid10 2 years ago
@statueoflibertykid10,
power plants do not use smoke, they use steam, which is completely harmless. check your facts.
Montymio 2 years ago
@Montymio ,
well i wish it was power plants
StatueOfLibertyKid10 2 years ago
the last one was awesome
SAMC1TY96 2 years ago 4
i feel like playing red faction guerrilla now :D
ary2000 2 years ago
for a moment in 0:32 i thought the building bounced back up :D:D:D
kosyo6 2 years ago
collapse of palace are my biggest fear
Shoryureppa 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
where's WTC?
MiLSeLrAhC 2 years ago
Final smoke stack was the best.
FuckinBastard1 2 years ago 66
cus its hard to let a building collapse in a way that you want! so thats why people clap!
borisjo13 2 years ago
Bu why the peoples claps the hands when bulding go down? Clap what?
lovepapu 2 years ago
lol theres a nuke coming out the chimney at 1:33
branchlinedisaster 2 years ago 5
What Explosives Do Thy Use?
koolkid986 2 years ago
they use c4
paulfrostvxr 2 years ago
nice jobe destroying that chemical plant!
hairyknuckles1000 2 years ago
на 1-30 труба классно села вообще
dalgat01 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Демонтаж домов? Хорошо снято.и сделано.
44BBC 2 years ago
Comment removed
xxXRoseCherryXxx 2 years ago
the process of destroying buildings
melikabangbang 2 years ago 2
oh my god u dont know what demolition means???!! are u like 4?
SAMC1TY96 2 years ago
Comment removed
xxXRoseCherryXxx 2 years ago
not everybody are born with english act or whatever
tine47 2 years ago
haha that was funny cool ending!
MrGymnast88 2 years ago
i lol'd when the last one made a puff-o-smoke
igotbored44 2 years ago
looks like a huge cigarett :D
paddpojken 2 years ago
69!
haoqh 2 years ago
I can read that. But in a contracting universe (our universe is expanding and that's why time goes "forward") your shit comes up from the WC and enters your bowels and your food comes up from your stomach and onto the plate.
This sort of life will take a lot of getting use to when it happens.
But people in an contracting universe will be hard put to imagine otherwise. Why? They say, do people not enter the world coming out from the earth and grow younger until into the mother's womb?
CommanderUTube 2 years ago
awesome!
superE1113z 2 years ago
I love the last one.
Princessdaisygirl12 2 years ago
What if demolishing workers accidentally blow up the wrong building. then oops sorry. they look similar.
undocumentedspot 2 years ago
Wow, these buildings went back up again.
Imagine in a universe when time goes backwards. The Twin Towers and Building 7 will rise again from the ashes. People will rise from the dead and live their lives until they are born into their mothers' womb. We will all talk backwards
CommanderUTube 2 years ago