Added: 3 years ago
From: diagonaluk
Views: 238,723
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (295)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Keep pressing 4

  • Thumbs up if 0:51 was Sherlock Holmes 2 ! :) :)

  • Hope there was NEVER a time someone was in there =)

  • this is what happens when you piss off the land lord!!

  • see, this is what happens when u dont pay your rent!

  • don't ya just watching shit get demolished!

  • Comment removed

  • I've forgett to take my wallet from this building... Fuck...

  • They fall apart like lego, very cool :D

  • 00:40 is that wat i think it is... A NUCLEAR PLANT!!!!!!!

  • I've seen two other buildings fall just like this... New York, September 11th

  • damn it chuck norris! be careful!

  • 1:33

  • 1:31 disgusting (perverted people only knows)...:D

  • @FuJi1616

    Does this mean i'm a pervert?

    Fuck.

  • 0:12 chuck norris farts hardly

  • 0:06 they are happy because they demolished a building built with their own money

  • last chimney, smoke stack was best

  • 0:54 is just a perfect demolition

  • stupid commersials

  • 1:05 + bye bye city?? :O

  • Fucking AD at youtube!!!

  • humans waste so much shelter >.< why cant we turn those empty buildings into shelters for the homeless :D

    HOBOS FTW

  • what is this? Super Mario?

  • does 9/11 ring belling with these implosions?

  • @GayBoyRunning no, not really.

  • @1Gabrielsson1 Then i guess your intelligence can not compare the differents then?

  • @GayBoyRunning ah so you are a person that must insult people if they do not think the same as you do, very mature of you.

  • @1Gabrielsson1 No i guess you dont see what other that know the truth behind the lies.

  • At 1.30 is like me smoking after lunch :)

  • 0:29 i literally thought for 1 sec that the building actually bounced back...:O

  • hate it when u reverse the clips just make it understandable that u didnt have enough clips to show

  • 1:31 Wow !

  • @IAwzm ikr

  • If you watch this video backwards , it looks like vacuums rebuilding theirselves and suck the dust XD

  • Awsome demolitions, i wonder if any one left any key car or any pet in there :P do u imagine? "Hey dude, nice demolition, have you seen my cat?"

  • I dont see the twin towers ???

    

  • @zzzzguner that wasn't a fucking demolition you piece of shit

  • GODZILLA DID IT

  • Damn it's like watching the trailer of a Michael Bay movie.

  • Roach! clean this shit up!

  • @McSoccerplayer18 i think you mean Ramirez! clean this up! lol

  • @RazorX53, haha yea

  • 1:34 big bong

  • 1:30 - 1:39 reminds me of what happens when I see recent Lindsey Lohan pictures :/

  • 0:46 fail! 0:50 Double FAIL!

  • YES! we got a bonus :D (0:41)

  • Am I the only one who thought at 0:06 "okay....START RUNNING!"

  • 1:34 smoke ring xD

  • @GeNoCaYd more like mushroom cloud :D

  • Last one was sweet

  • THE HUMANITY... o.o

  • 1:31 , Mushrooms :)

  • Destroy the objective!

  • 0.22 please dont tell me that thoughs two structures were flats people lived in. what the hell were people thinking in the 60s to 70s?

  • OMFG im pretty sure the second one was in 1000 ways to die when the crackheads blew up;]

  • Oh my God! Spongebob is back in town!

  • brb wasting money

  • rixto hliaaaaaaaaa

  • 28...29...30! Ready or not here I come! Man, these buildings are good at hiding!

  • FUCK YEAH!!!!!!!!!!

  • I can find a job to the teorrists, They can make this job so good, exellent job instead of exploding good buildings

  • 1:02 quickest way to evict lazy unwanted tenants.

  • At 00:35 we see why it makes sense that WTC building 7 fell straight down at free fall acceleration through the path of greatest resistance. Nothing to see here people. Go back to watching American Idol.

  • @152czar you sir, are a douchebag.

  • imagine, that they destroy the "Burdsch Chalifa"- building in Dubai! xD

  • what is the name of the building at 00:54

  • haha the smoke stack was still doing its job even to its was being demolished

  • Holy crap dude, let them fall all the way before cutting to the next clip... X.X

  • gods playing himself a awesome game of jenga

  • shouldn't the trade towers be in this video? =/

  • I like the fail 0:22

  • I liked the bit where the building fell down

  • you made it really exciting & fun, love the reverse segments- awesome!

  • woah did anyone else notice the buildings rebuild itself at 0:27?

  • adds

  • Cool music.

  • SEPTEMBER 11 TWIN TOWERS DESTROYNG = DEMOLITION

  • @Izotopzx no

  • wooow 1:30

  • wooow

  • now clean this all up

  • I'm just wondering what the reason is for the gay music?

  • oh god the grey bar is back!

  • 1:30 Lookes great

  • terorist attack ooooohhhhh nnnnoooooooooooooo.fuck you all.

  • it looks as if they're made of cardboards when they fell

  • 0:55 that reminded me the dark knight

  • haha 0:30 FAIL

  • very nice video! =)

  • where's WTC?

  • I'd have to say this is one of my favorite gametypes on Modern Warfare 2

  • The tower at the end was smoking its last weed.

  • @XGnee Smoke rings and all.

  • there is no doubt that the smoke stack at the end was the coolest

  • 最後の煙突の、ナイス!

  • uh that was meh house why did u destroy it im gonna sue u

  • Puerto Rico still holds the world record for most demolitions at once.

  • omg! all those buildings fell down!

  • the last explosion is funny there comes a mushroom cloud out of the tower

  • looks to me like wtc 7

  • no building 7? phooey

  • see how in just about all of these they blow EVERY floor out for whichever direction they want the building to fall and THEN it falls... that's not what happened on the WTC... the WTC was not a controlled explosion, conspiracy ppl get a life.

  • @rasonage because your first statement(that in every one of theses they blow EVERY floor out...)

    is so stupid and wrong im going to assume evry thing else you say is wrong as well. if you cant say something factual about a 2 min video that you just watched, how reliable can you be about something that happened 8 years ago and you didnt even see?

  • American Behavioral Scientist vol. 53 No.6 Feb 2010

    Why people are too stupid to recognize 9/11 as a SCAD, State Crime Against Democracy, and the implications for these stupid people

  • @Slavestorms Lol I know right? These demolitions are exactly like 9/11. And an aluminum air plain with a poorly flamable fuel could not have made a 180 story building designed specifically to counter fires collapse at almost free fall speed. It's absurd that this could happen.

  • @NCC17O1Q This was nothing like 9/11, because these were controlled demolitions. Please stop saying things like that. 9/11 was a terrorist attack.

  • @sim2lew The plane went inside the side not threw the hole core structure. If the fuel did it the top of the building and a small amount below the explosion would have fell.

  • @NCC17O1Q The plane destroys pat of the side and enters the tower. Fire takes hold. Metal fatigues. Top falls THROUGH rest of building. Building collapses completely. END OF STORY. These demolitions were nothing like the WTC attacks, because they were controlled, and charges were places near the bottoms. Now please, be quiet.

  • @sim2lew As you said the demolitions in this video were caused by charges placed at the BOTTOM. An ALUMINUM plane with a type fuel that only generates fires at about 1500 DEGREES C at the TOP of the building wouldn't have brought the whole thing down. And the top didn't fall threw the building, the bottom gave out. Please explain.

  • @NCC17O1Q I saw the whole thing unfold. The plane has momentum, it has the energy to get into the building. it destroys some of the metal, so the rest is under more stress, so fire burning would be catastrophic. If you re-watch some videos from the collapse, you see the top of the building disappear into the cloud of smoke, and then the rest of the building falls below. Just because you say a plane wouldn't bring down a building, well, IT DID. Live with it.

  • @sim2lew The one side of the top building was the only part that was damaged. If anything were to happen the the building the opposite side the top would have given out and the top would have fell off side ways. And even that is unprobable I know this from the designer of the WTC. It would take about 3-4 planes to bring those buildings down the way they did. Understand? THE BUILDINGS WERE ENGINEERED WITH THE STRUCTUAL INTEGRITY TO HOLD UP. Except the fact your government doesn't care about you.

  • @NCC17O1Q Err, I'm not American. WTC was fatigued. The plane[s] took out many columns, so weight was put on different supports. The fire took hold, and then the metal got warm, so became more malleable, so started to change shape, losing strength. The top then fell inwards, and the 'pancake effect' took hold. Try looking at some cited websites explaining what happened. Now, please, understand that bringing down flat blocks is not terrorism.

  • @sim2lew I'm going to have to agree with you. While looking for a video for you to watch, I came into contact with a video I've never thought could be so persuasive. somebody debunking all these theories. The evidence is overwhelming and extremely convincing. I can't argue with it. My apologies if I wasted your time.

  • @NCC17O1Q Sorry if I'm wrong, but was that sarcastic?

  • @sim2lew No.

  • @sim2lew - The WTC was taken down on purpose. There's no way that one airplane at the top of such a huge, structurally sound building could take down a building, and so perfectly straight down. To have that happen twice? Then what about the WTC 7 building that wasn't even hit by anything, coming down perfectly straight. We don't know who did it, but that was planned.

  • @BayviewFinch Errm, no. Stop going on about that. So many people died, and all the sick, twisted idiots like you want to believe is that someone planned it. I HAVE NEWS FOR YOU, SOMEONE DID PLAN IT. THE TERRORISTS WHO FLEW INTO THE BUILDING PLANNED IT. THEY HIT IT IN THE RIGHT PLACE TO BRING IT DOWN. I now want to ask you why you want to worry about that so much. It happened in the past. The WTC did come down from the plane strikes, it's called the pancake effect. Gravity pulls things down.

  • @sim2lew - We will not stop. That's what happens when there's a huge injustice like that. People are relentless. Even the architects of the WTC agree that it would be impossible for a crash like that to take down a tower. Just look at the scale of it. Sure, a jet is huge, but it's tiny compared to the whole building. Build a lego tower to scale and throw a little airplane at it with all your might. See what happens. Also, what about Air Traffic Control and the U.S. Air Force?

  • @sim2lew - I was watching the event unfold on CNN. That the air force weren't sent in is very suspicious. They just didn't notice that two jets were flying low over Manhattan, a huge population centre, at building level? And how do you explain Building 7? It wasn't even hit by a plane, yet it conveniently fell straight down, demolition-style, without harming any of the nearby buildings. LOL.

  • @BayviewFinch What did you want the air force to do? Also, note that there were airports nearby. No, ok, maybe it was the CIA or someone else, but you cannot doubt that whoever it was knew what they were doing. The plane hit 1/3 of the way down. Steel burns. the plane was full of fuel. The top of the building went through the rest. Whoever took down the WTC towers did so with a plane. I saw it on the news too, you know.

  • @sim2lew - So you're telling me that the world's most powerful military wasn't even able to spot 2 jets heading towards buildings in Manhattan and do something about it? You've normally got air traffic controllers who will notice the slightest infractions of air space. Military fighters are supposedly trained to respond in seconds. You see them scramble when a 2-seater Cessna flies into restricted airspace. It's very suspicious that there was no interception of the jets, at least the second.

  • @BayviewFinch There is something, that a top offical for first time in history took control of air-space and said it was ok for the planes to be there...Truth. Was in a documentary.

  • @sim2lew - There were 3 towers that went down. Only 2 were hit by planes. 3 buildings fell straight down. You really need to catch up on things. It's as if you haven't even watched the basics of basics, Farenheit 9/11. There's plenty more info. out there too. Just look. How does a relatively small plane take down a building? It doesn't. Explosives take down a building. Very carefully planned explosives, along with cutting support beams at very specific points in the building.

  • @BayviewFinch You seem to have forgotten that planes have fuel, fuel burns and surprisingly enough, so does steel. I'm not saying the government didn't plan it, I'm also not saying they did. What I am saying is that those planes took out the twin towers. They went in 1/3 of the way down from the top, they weakened the structure, then the top of the building fell down through the rest due to gravity. How the other buildings collapsed is a mystery, but the twin towers were brought down by planes.

  • @sim2lew - That "mystery" of the other building falling down is also part of the mystery of the two main towers falling down.

  • @BayviewFinch And of course there's no such thing as Debris.

  • @rasonage You're a sheep. It's scientifically absurd that an aluminum plane with a poorly flamable fuel could have collapsed two 180 story buildings specifically designed to counter fires and impact at a near free fall speed with 2 m wide steel core support beams with a melt temperature of at least 3500 degrees C (7032 F). Do your research. If an air plane brought a building down it would have fallen sideways, not collapsed in a perfect line at free fall speed.

  • @NCC17O1Q Do you not understand? PLANE IS FULL OF FUEL. FUEL GOES EVERYWHERE. FUEL BURNS. STRUCTURE WEAKENS. TOP FALLS THROUGH REST OF BUILDING!

  • awesome...thanks for the post!

  • 1:34 :))

  • 00:53 COOOOOL :O

  • Did anyone else notice some of the buildings looked practically new?

  • Yeah i've always been thinking that too!!!!

  • I think they clean it Beforee

    Thoughtt.. =P!

  • @JetSetForLife Sometimes the soil under the building gets instable, so building becomes dangerous. There were cases when multi-million brand new buildings had to be destroyed.

  • @JetSetForLife

    demolition includes destroying some buildings whom were newly built but had a major design fail ..

  • @JetSetForLife asbest and so on

  • @JetSetForLife Well yes, the buildings might have had structural problems like one sky scraper was sinking into the ground very very very slowly but they cought that and there was nothing else to do and they destroyed it. You sir, need to do your research

  • @benry200 I don't need to because 1 year later someone like you will explain it to me. :)

  • @JetSetForLife like at 0:54, it had a banner on it advertising it's completion wtf?

  • :23 Massive!

  • High rise demolitions pretty much look the same all over the world. Very few are brought down with such precision so the foundation walls remain intact. An incendiary mixture called 'thermite" or thermate is used to cut opposing angles across steel girders. Edward Louis Bernays (1891-1995) had said that by 2001, most people will not think for themselves. They will simply believe whatever they are told on television. No math, physics, documentary of photographic evidence will make any difference.

  • where are the airplanes?

  • thank you for the patronih i should say ty

  • the last one was so epic it was awsome

  • the best one was 0:42

    BYE BYE FACTORY :P

  • @statueoflibertykid10,

    power plants do not use smoke, they use steam, which is completely harmless. check your facts.

  • @Montymio ,

    well i wish it was power plants

  • the last one was awesome

  • i feel like playing red faction guerrilla now :D

  • for a moment in 0:32 i thought the building bounced back up :D:D:D

  • collapse of palace are my biggest fear

  • Final smoke stack was the best.

  • cus its hard to let a building collapse in a way that you want! so thats why people clap!

  • Bu why the peoples claps the hands when bulding go down? Clap what?

  • lol theres a nuke coming out the chimney at 1:33

  • What Explosives Do Thy Use?

  • they use c4

  • nice jobe destroying that chemical plant!

  • на 1-30 труба классно села вообще

  • the process of destroying buildings

  • oh my god u dont know what demolition means???!! are u like 4?

  • Comment removed

  • not everybody are born with english act or whatever

  • haha that was funny cool ending!

  • i lol'd when the last one made a puff-o-smoke

  • looks like a huge cigarett :D

  • 69!

  • I can read that. But in a contracting universe (our universe is expanding and that's why time goes "forward") your shit comes up from the WC and enters your bowels and your food comes up from your stomach and onto the plate.

    This sort of life will take a lot of getting use to when it happens.

    But people in an contracting universe will be hard put to imagine otherwise. Why? They say, do people not enter the world coming out from the earth and grow younger until into the mother's womb?

  • awesome!

  • I love the last one.

  • What if demolishing workers accidentally blow up the wrong building. then oops sorry. they look similar.

  • Wow, these buildings went back up again.

    Imagine in a universe when time goes backwards. The Twin Towers and Building 7 will rise again from the ashes. People will rise from the dead and live their lives until they are born into their mothers' womb. We will all talk backwards