Added: 2 years ago
From: FYB2007
Views: 268,073
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (203)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i watched nadal first 'cause i save best for last

  • Does nadal let his arm fall more than federers?

  • @chickentorice Nadal was trying put more spin on the ball than Federer. If Federer had spin-production in mind, his body would be titled more downwards as well.

  • Need more examples, this is warmup, neat idea regardless

  • Is Federer warming up in this video?

  • its like comparing bagels to cream cheese. one without the other is disgusting.

  • @dinosmashify err.. no?

  • Fed's not doing a windshield wiper on this one whereas, nadal is.

  • roger is forehand, rafael is topspin. the video shows it all

  • Thumbs up if you played this video more than once!

  • Comment removed

  • Right off the top, I find the big difference is the preparation. Nadal has tremendous wrist lay back on the back swing, which looks kind of ugly. Federer has very little. More classic looking. Though both are very effective.

  • Nadal uses a much different technique to get topspin, coming from under the ball a lot more, Roger prefers his initial contact point to be flat, putting topspin on the follow through.

  • lol when you guys first watched this and couldnt decide which serve to watch, how many of ya'll picked roger? fed for life!!

  • Comment removed

  • nadal swing from lower thats why he need more wrist. you can say their technique is the same but their different grip change it a bit

  • Insane topspin vs Flatter Power. I'll take topspin

  • Their forehands utilize similar techniques. Most players don't straighten their arms at contact point with the ball, but Roger's and Nadal's forearms are rather straight. Compare their forehands to the likes of Djokovic's or Tsonga's. The latter's two's power is mainly derived from the rotation of their core muscles - thereby locking their wrists - , while the former two's power is primarily derived from their wrist pronation (inertial lag) and the transition of power from the body to the wrist.

  • @nickngyuheng I like the way you mention 'inertial lag'. I've never seen that aspect of 'reverse body action' described in that terminology. I used to do that when I was playing a lot (but in those days I wasn't using the perpendicular racquet preparation). It was called 'leaving the racquet behind'. I study Fed's strokes extensively, and he doesn't always use 'inertial lag'... only when there's time. He also has several 'looks' on his forehand... more than Nadal.

  • Nadal forehand is full off technical mistakes

  • @TheSweatdreams94 and what makes them mistakes? is it because his forehand is different from the forehand your coach teaches you?

  • @amsd1231 his wrist, all the professional coaches are telling that, but whatever it works ^^ One fundamental thing in a forehand is to keep the racquet's head over the wrist when bringing the racquet back ! With this you'll do less mistakes ! Roger's forehand is the "perfect" forehand whereas Nadal's is quite of a homemade lol

  • @TheSweatdreams94 I don't mean to be profound or anything, but is the perfect forehand perfect because there is a definite standard of perfection or is it because it achieves a certain end (in this case hitting a powerful consistent shot)? If it is the former case, then what makes this standard. Is it a hypothetical construct by the top coaches? Either way I am lead to think that it is the result that is important. Let me remind you standard of beauty is a whole other discussion.

  • @TheSweatdreams94 That's the modern game, it's based more on wicked spin and rotational forces; not just getting sideways and stepping in... although you see Djoker 'stepping in' more than most pros

  • federer is just the tennis god

  • Nadal's forehand is just beautiful

  • nadal drops his wrist too early when he hits a forehand. but its still a GREAT one

  • you can't compare the forehands of these two... they are completely different...

  • there guiding hand has the same motion

  • in many ways their forehands look similar....anyone agree?

  • @rockhardX No.

  • @rockhardX Yep. Look at Tommy Haas, too. Today's pros all hit similar forehands... different from guys like Connors (straight back, 'to-and-fro'), and Borg didn't use the 'inertial lag' in his loop. Some guys like Murray are usually kind of 'semi-traditional' though

  • @xelagnay10 they hit with equally the same amount of spin.

    that whole "rpm" shit doesnt matter.

    federer hits with a huge amount of topspin but drives the ball more into the court while nadal brushes more with the ball and moonballs a lot deeper into the court

  • lol LOOK AT THERE NONE RACKET HAND!!

  • i think roger's forehand more better than nadal.

  • @Nadhirah1995 It is, Roger has the best forehand in tennis

  • maaan Nadals forehand looks so awfull compared to his backhand or feds forehand :(

  • @affenkeks Are you sure? /watch?v=kupMonfoI44

  • what program do you use to edit the video?

  • Roger is the classic greatest ever. love Roger

  • @federerbestclass Omg shut up!!!!

  • @Sundin456 what?

  • @Sundin456 since you are Nadal's fan, it say, "shut up" to me? What is the purpose?

  • @Sundin456 Does it really bother you that much?

  • did nadal switch to eastern forehand? doesn't look like a western to me.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @Jubakaye but nadal is injured and thats a part of the game. u don't decide who the better player is by only comparing them when they are at their best. the reason federer is the GOAT is cause he plays well consistently without any injuries

  • @FeDXeGX That's ludicrous. If a person plays consistently and well, he can be better than another player of similar skill level even if he is hindered more by injuries.

  • Lets not forget that Roger and Rafa use 2 different grips on the forehand. Federer uses an Eastern grip while Nadal uses a full Western grip which is better for hitting lower balls and it generates more spin because of the more upward brushing motion imparted on the back of the ball. The Eastern grip allows you to hit harder and flatter.

    Agree anyone??

  • @nishjaxx not me. a westerm grip makes it easier to hit a high ball and harder to hit a low ball. not the other way around

  • @nishjaxx No.. Western grip is for high balls... that's why Fed hits underspin to western-style players... they can't get under a low ball. And also why clay-court Western-grip players did poorly at Wimbledon back in the day when the grass had low-skidding, sliced shots.

  • Same type of "windshield wiper forehand" is shown with these two as they pronate (turn their hand and arm over ) before, during and after contact. They both hit with the same straight arm technique rather than the double bend as well. Federer hits through the ball more and Rafa has a more vertical swing path but they are essentially two examples of the same technique.

  • OMG, i would kill to get nadal's forehand.

    dont get me wrong, federer's forehand is ultimate shiet too, but im a spin lover, so nadal's works for me. plus, i love his follow-through although overall, federer's is more beautiful

  • to think nadal's forehand is better than federer's you must have smoken weed, or be an idiot, or most likely both!

  • @odyssey20011 there's no "better forehand", both are equally solid but completely different

  • @odyssey20011 to think Federer's forehand is better than Nadal's, you must be on heroin, or be a hardcore fedophile/federast, or, most likely, both.

    That's the forehand Nadal used to defeat Federer 14 times. What else is there to say?

  • @natule7ka uuuum i dont know! maybe that federer used his forehand to win 16 slams and outragously dominate during 4 consecutive years?

  • windup and stroke are insanely different, yet these to players are the only ones on tour who finish their swing below shoulder-height.

    federer due to the insanely early strike zone, and rafa due to tue his grip and crazy top spin he puts on it.

    remarkable. 

  • @chrism216 no they aren't. a lot of players finish below shoulder height

  • it looks the same a bit but its not the same

  • federer is hitting the ball flately and the ball moves a bit faster,while nadal puts a lot of spin on it,he is striking the ball from low to high and that federer twists his wrist so that the racket is horizontal to the ball...that's the difference

  • why does nadal take his racket all the way behind his ass? it sems like his wrist would be broken

  • Rafa is best !

  • @r0baa federer's forehand is techincally, mechanically, and aesthetically much better than rafa's.

  • @cj397 no it is not..it is just technically,mechanically, and aesthetically much different

  • Do you have any video where it is synced as they swing rather than at contact?

  • left handers have an advantage simply because there are less left handed players around...

  • @konvictz0007 that's not why they have an advantage

    they have an advantage because a left handed persons cross court forehand goes to a right handed persons backhand, and a cross court forehand should be the most consistent shot, because cross court to cross court has the longest distance giving you the most area to get your forehand in.

  • @paulchae8 exactly and that gives them an advantage because theres less of them. lol u just backed up what i said.

    if left and right handers were 50:50 it would be different.

  • @paulchae8 not to mention that the net is lowest in the middle.

  • thay are the same close raquet face drive the end cap into the ball just do that and dont think about spin. loose wrist watch the ball into the strings.

  • Nadal's right arm doesn't move

  • i think nadals forehand is very cool

  • Nadals mind boggling spin is due to the fact that he's left handed, his arm and wrist techniuqe, and (not least of all) his raquet. Give him Federers flat beam 90 Wilson and his spin would not be so 'mind boggling'.

  • @royeeeee Left handedbess does not automatically increase spin ...

  • @KnightofZyryab in terms of rpms' of course being left handed has no advantage. in terms of left handed spin dynamics against right handers . . as the vast majority of pros' are. . Rafa, with his techniqe being a lefty gives him a huge advantage. Put it this way. A right handed Rafael Nadal means Roger Federer has a bigger trophy case.

  • @royeeeee Pure speculation.

  • i think the main difference is the grip their using

  • Actually Nadal has more spin in his Forehand than Federer's.

  • Mad Respect for these two dudes!

  • I have never seen a left hand forehand that produces a spin like Nadal's, fucking mind boggling.

  • how cool is this!!!

  • Yes i do play tennis and what you say, that's with every top - 10 player in the tour. C'mon following the ball have you ever seen a player look above when he hit the ball. I don't think that a lefty and a right handed can have the same technik

  • Why can they not? Left handers and right handers just hold the racket in a different hand, it's not going to change the technique.

  • @WytzeDriessens lol why can't a lefty and righty have the same technique?

  • Roger is the best player ever period but a real cry baby

    when he doesnt get his way. Nadal is more of a sportsman, he is definitely less talented with less amount of variety in his game but his heart is what has made him beat Roger so many times even on hard courts and with no legs or energy left. Tennis needs them both unlike some of the bores.

  • @elreyki I agree with your post mostly except for Federer being a cry baby and Nadal being more sportsmanlike. Federer is not a cry baby just because he cried at the Australian Open, he has great respect for Nadal and he tried not to cry but he wanted the title so badly and he was sick of losing to Nadal but Federer always has something nice to say to any player and Nadal the same both are great players and great people for the sport of tennis.

  • Comment removed

  • Roger is the true class

  • Cool video, thanks for posting.

  • it's bullshit to compare a right handed and a left handed, it's a totaly different technic always

  • your bullshit

  • No... How? If you know so much tell me how. Its not a totally different technic always. Look at thier feet, look at their back swings,look a how there heads follow the ball into the racket and dont look at their shot until their shoulders have rotated. You really dont know anything. You think you know something, but you dont. Do you play tennis?

  • how can you compare a lefty and a right handed player, that's bullshit

  • i can. it's called vertical reflection. lol

    did you know? you have 1 arm on ur left side and another arm on ur right side, same with the legs.

  • Federer has a cleaner more sodil balaced forehand with more power than nadals but with a little less spin Nadals forehand has more spin but less power cause he uses more rist and has more of a low to high swing than federers which is more accross his body

  • Fed also keeps his head down for longer after he hits the ball, it gives him better balance in the follow through.

  • bram bam bam balan ban bam , brin bon bin balamban bum, bun bon ban biribing. But that's just my opinion.

  • Technique isn't all that matters considering Nadal has beaten Federer over twice as many times than he has won. I personally prefer Nadal's "unorthodox" and "ugly" forehand because it generates more topspin and uses more wrist movement, which comes natural to me.

  • Nadal leads 13-7. (7 x 2 is 14 mate.)

  • they have the stop sign lol right when they cock their wrists.

  • Nadal = nasty ugly forehand crazy spins

    Federer = pretty nice forehand semicrazy spins

  • @GtrEvo Your an idiot

  • i don't understand why pple say tt their technique is the same... its completely different

    Fed locks his risk and uses more of his forearm + his racket speed while Nadal uses alot of wrists which is quite unorthodox

  • maybe because in this very example Nadal does not pull the racket over his head, as he often does for his crazy topspins

  • @lzhaol

    you are so wrong about everything in your post lol

  • @lzhaol Same. Pay attention to the shoulder joint motion. Shoulder controls the whole arm motion because that is where the major muscles are. This is the most effortless way to control the arm movement. Pay NO attention to the elbow or the wrist - these joint positions are affected by their different grip and amount of spin.

    You will also find that these modern plays are all the same.

  • @lzhaol Federer does NOT lock his wrist... That would be horrible for a shot. Instead he lets it move in much the same way that Rafa and almost all pros use their wrists. They lay it back then let the racket come through. If you were to TOTALLY lock your wrist the shot would lose a lot of power and control.

  • @lzhaol The technique in this video is the same. It's called the "windshield wiper forehand." If you doubt me, ask the man who posted this video, who happens to be a tennis coach. Nadal usually hits reverse forehands during matches. That's the difference maker.

  • @lzhaol You couldn't be more wrong about federer's wrist. When you use an eastern and hit hard, if you don't use a TON of wrist you are going to have real consistency issues.

  • @lzhaol nobody uses wrist to hit forehand, it is his semi western grip that gibes a lot of spin

  • @lzhaol Totally agree. And besides. If you freeze it at 10 seconds, you can even see that the angle of their arm is different.

  • @lzhaol no one says that

  • @lzhaol

    Depending on where you learned to play tennis, not unorthodox at all.

  • Arms fully stretched when they make contact to the ball,

    preparation and way they grip are different but other than that,

    THEIR FOREHANDs are VERY SIMILAR

    oh one more that might be different would be the hitting point, Fed hits when the balls is at the highest and Nadal tends to wait a bit time to time

  • they are far more similar than what i would have thought

  • probably the END of the follow throughs are similar (aross the body), but other than that, they mechanics of their swings are completely different from each other.

  • their mechanism is completely the same!

  • Also the stretched arm at contact point and the back swing (just racquet head high while sholder turns back) are similar. The way Nadal drops and releases is more articulated and "loopy". He takes the elbow more back and down, then stretches the arm and releases with a 40/60 forewards/upwards follow through. Federer just stretches the arm and releases with a 50/50 fw/uw FT. Different grips: almost eastern Roger, almost western Rafael.

  • it's eastern u assholes god learn your tennis facts.

  • Two of the best forehands in the world right there!

  • roger doesn't hit with semi he uses eastern

  • federer uses eastern not semi u dumbass

  • ....Wow.... you should... study and research more "before" you leave a comment rofl.

  • definetly needs to do research it's almost impossible to hit an eastern grip unless your over the age of 50, those are the only people I've played that can hit with a straight eastern

  • I had to sign in just to laugh hahaha.. it is a known fact that Fed uses an Eastern grip.. "Footwork is identical" hahaha.. im going to fall over

  • if nadal has the same footwork as federer, why the fuck did he break his knees? think about it... federer is number 1 because his footwork is different then anyone elses. everyone is struggeling with his footwork on tour (I can tell that)

  • They have a similar footwork (on this video)

  • ROGER!!!!!

  • FEDDDD

  • their follow throughs end up in pretty much the same place now, i thought rafas used to be more over his left shoulder

  • yea rafa number 1!

  • go rafa

  • They both look awesome!

  • rogers technique will allow him to carry on playing tennis for a very long time. It alomst looks effortless whereas nadal will wear his body down in the future cos of his energy demanding technique

  • Federer changes his grip during his swing

  • Wow, they couldn't look more different. It's a wonder they can even play together!

  • Federer's grip looks almost like a continental here...

  • Roger;s Eastern forehand is soo beautiful. Look how relaxed and naturel it is... you can also see how much topspin Rafa puts on the ball... FYB videos are the shit!

  • Sooooo wrong.

  • .. Fuzzyyellowballs has a video where Fed's forehandgrip is explained.. watch it. it's eastern.

  • nope, roger uses eastern... you're making yourself look stupid

  • I think he tilts toward the semi-western a bit. He's defenitly somewhere in between both. Kind of an hybrid grip between semi-western and Eastern.

    So, it would defently not be so idiot for some to see it semi-western, nor Eastern.

  • look at fyb's video on Federer's forehand.... eastern man.

  • Comment removed

  • Watch FYB's vid on his grip-he uses both. It's funny though, people like you argue over this so much but it doesn't help you play better.

  • that's a really dumb statement when you don't know me or know how i play tennis.

  • I don't need to know how you play to tell you that you, sir, make yourself stupid by telling others "you're making yourself look stupid"

  • not really...

  • Well, Federer's grip allows you to play a stroke swing like he does. It is simply not suitable to use a semi-western to do this.

    IF this swing happens to be your natural pattern, it does make you better to play eastern.

  • Could you elaborate? How couldn't you "swing like him" with a semi?Thanks

  • Because you need a more open angle on your racket face to swing in a more linear pattern.

    The more close your face is, the better it is to swing vertically.

    Never said it was not possible, I said it's suitable. Simply means you have to alterate your swing path to fully benefit of your grip. Why? Because no matter how you swing your racket must square at impact. Most of time, the ball is struck with the face almost perpendicular to the ground.

  • Therefore, the more your face is closed because of your grip, the more it needs to opened by your swing.

    Federer uses an eastern and you clearly can see his swing path is more linear, you could say it's literally diagonal. It also allows him to fully stretch his arm.

    Roddick uses a semi I think and you clearly can see he is driving it almost perectly vertically with a bent elbow.

    Different grips needs different swing path to be used at their fullest advantages.

  • i agree with that last part. changing grips usually requires finding a matching swing. there are just so many factors that contribute to producing a stroke. backswing, strike zone,  wrist bend, etc.

    Plus there are many variations to any grip, you could say that there are 3-4 ways of holding a semiwestern grip, maybe more. it all comes down to adjusting to whats comfortable.

    It can be debated, but even Federer has quite an arsenal of different forehands.

  • i agree, sometimes i wonder if the grip you use even makes any real difference. just have to hit the ball on an angle to generate spin.

  • Just look at the angle of the racquet face at various stages and how wobbly Nadal's is and how stable Federer's is.

  • How can people think these are similar. They are remarkably different. Grip, wristiness, backswing, follow through. Look closer.

  • coz they dont know what their talking about. and prolly dont even know how to plkay tennis.

  • well said... GO FED JUST ONE MORE SLAM!

  • MORE THAN one!! A FEW MORE potentially. If he can get emotionally back together after Historic French Open win, Wimby 09 will be a shoe-in. Especially with Nadal not at 100%. Oh yes, more than one slam left in Roger!

  • What's funny about tennis is how you master your health; it is very rare you aren't the very cause of your injuries. Nadal plays very aggressivly and his motion is damaging his body.

    He's a very solid player, very fun to watch, but he will definitly not be a serious contendor to Federer's reccord, nor does he is in shape to slow Federer down now.

    He is a new player, Federer; he used to be using only the baseline, now he dominate differently. What a complete player.